San Luis Care Center
709 N Street, Newman, CA 95360 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 71 certified beds · (209) 862-2862 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2024
- it has 4 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $46,118 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-30)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.1% | 10.2% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.4% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.7% | 1.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.5% | 1.6% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 14.5% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 27.9% | 13.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.3% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.0% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 20.3% | 10.2% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.6% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.5% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 18.1% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.8% | 11.2% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.59 | 2.25 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.83 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
56.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 73 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 48.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 56.6%CMS range 44.3–70.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.7%CMS range 7.2–15.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 48.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 31.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 39.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 94.1% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.7%CMS range 5.3–14.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.00 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 71 beds and averages 64.7 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.85 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.56 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.53 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.99 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
42 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-09-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility nursing staff failed to use the proper turning technique and ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), received adequate supervision and assistance during pericare (cleaning a patient's genital and anal areas) to prevent falls when Resident 1 who was deemed fully dependent for toileting hygiene, experienced a fall on 9/7/25. The certified nursing assistant did not ensure implementation of effective intervention as the use of a draw sheet (sheet placed underneath a patient to assist with repositioning and transferring in a healthcare setting) or proper technique and positioning without draw sheet for Resident 1 in accordance with facility competency, training consistent with Resident 1's care's need. This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining an avoidable fall during pericare leading to a scalp laceration (cut or tear in the scalp, the outer layer of the head), traumatic brain injury (TBI - an injury to the brain caused by an external force) with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-01-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safety and protection for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) was free from abuse and neglect when Resident 1 had a known history of sexual behaviors that was care planned and interventions were not implemented for Resident 1. On 12/30/23, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 noticed Resident 1 in the dining room unsupervised, CNA 2 neglected to implement care planned intervention leaving Resident 1 unattended. Resident 1 touched Resident 2 ' s breast in front of her husband during a visit. This failure resulted in the lack of supervision of Resident 1 in the dining room with a female resident present and resulted in the violation of Resident 2 ' s dignity, which could have resulted in humiliation, and psychosocial harm for a reasonable person. Resident 2 had severe cognitive impairment (trouble remembering, learning new things, concentrating, or making decisions) and she did not like it when her breast was touched.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a resident-centered comprehensive care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 with known inappropriate sexual behaviors was left unattended on 12/30/23 in the dining room. On 12/30/23, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 noticed Resident 1 in the dining room unsupervised, CNA 2 did not implement care planned intervention to not leave Resident 1 alone with female peers. CNA 2 left Resident 1 unattended, Resident 1 touched Resident 2 ' s breast. This failure resulted in the lack of supervision of Resident 1 in the dining room with a female resident present and resulted in the violation of Resident 2 ' s dignity, which could have resulted in humiliation, and psychosocial harm for a reasonable person. Resident 2 had severe cognitive impairment (trouble remembering, learning new things, concentrating, or making decisions) and she did not like it when her breast was touched. Findings: During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2019-05-28 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a fall risk care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 352) when: Resident 352's fall risk was determined to be high risk for falls on 4/5/19 and care plan interventions were not developed to keep her safe, free from falls and fall related injuries. This failure resulted in Resident 352's fall, a laceration to the bridge of her nose, a hematoma [a solid swelling of clotted blood within the tissues], discoloration to the left side of her head, pain and a left hip fracture which required surgical repair for the hip fracture and a nine-day hospitalization. Findings: During an interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3, on 5/23/19, at 8:25 a.m., LVN 3 stated Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3 notified him of Resident 352's fall on 4/9/19 at 10:45 p.m., during the night. LVN 3 stated he went to Resident 352's room and found her on the floor facing down without wearing a gown and without socks [hospital gown wrapped…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food and ice were stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when:1. [NAME] substances were found inside the bin in one of one ice machines located in the facility's kitchen.2. Food Service Worker (FSW) 4 was observed utilizing the kitchen sanitation bucket to sanitize food carts that did not contain the recommended concentration levels of quaternary ammonium (a group of chemicals used for killing bacteria, fungi, and viruses) for sanitization (to reduce the number of disease-causing pathogens).3. Expired items were found in the residents' food refrigerator in the facility's break room and there was no thermometer in the residents' food in the freezer in the facility's break room.These failures had the potential to cause the growth of microorganisms (organisms that are too small to be seen with the naked eye) and spread foodborne illness (disease or period of sickness caused by food contamination) to the 66 residents that were served meals…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals (define) were locked and labeled in accordance with current accepted professional standards of practice and facility procedures for one of five sampled residents (Resident 48) and two of three medication carts when: 1. [NAME] wing medication cart contained Resident 48's inhaler medication (pressurized canister that delivers a precise, pre-measured puff of medication directly into the lungs) Budesonide-Formoterol Fumarate Aerosol (treatment for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD-chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing]) was found to not have an open date and beyond use date (BUD- the last date you can safely use a medication).This failure had the potential for Resident 48's medication to be administered past the discard date which could result in loss of effectiveness of the medication leading to poor management of Resident 48's condition.2. Registered Nurse (RN) 1 left her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-06 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two Food Service Workers (FSW 2 and FSW 3) were competent to safely and effectively carry out the functions of food and nutrition services when:1. FSW 2 did not follow recipes during meal preparation of Turkey Sandwiches on 3/3/2026 and Chicken Enchiladas on 3/4/2026 and was not aware of what the use by date should be after mighty shakes (nutritional supplement) was thawed in the kitchen fridge on 3/1/26.2. FSW 3 was not aware of appropriate temperature for the dishwashing machine.These failures had the potential to result in residents' diet orders and facility menus not being followed which can affect residents' nutritional and medical status and to increase the growth of microorganisms and spread foodborne illness (disease or period of sickness caused by food contamination) to the 66 residents that were served meals from the kitchen.Findings:1.a. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/3/26 at 3:04 p.m. with FSW 2 in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food maintained its nutritional value when the cooked asparagus prepared for the lunch meal on 3/05/26 was not palatable and lacked flavor.This failure had the potential to result in residents having a decrease in oral intake which could lead to weight loss. The facility census was 66.Findings:During an interview on 3/3/26 at 10:57 a.m. with Resident 62, Resident 62 stated the facility needed to upgrade their food choices. Resident 62 stated the food served did not taste like it should.During an interview on 3/3/26 at 11:23 a.m. with Resident 31, Resident 31 complained of the facility's food having no flavor.During a review of the lunch meal on 3/5/26, indicated Marinated pork loin, parslied potatoes, and red pepper asparagus was to be served for the following diets: Regular, Consistent Carbohydrate Diet (CCD), Heart Healthy (Cardiac), soft and bite sized diets. During a concurrent lunch meal test tray observation and interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-06 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and review of facility documents, the facility failed to ensure the puree vegetables were in proper form when there were stringy pieces of asparagus throughout the food mixture on the lunch meal test tray on Thursday, March 5, 2026. Failure to properly process the puree food can result in choking for the five residents (Residents 6, 22, 50, 55, 69) on a puree diet at the facility.Findings:During an observation of the lunch meal test tray for a puree and regular diet in the presence of the Dietary Manager (DM) on 3/5/26 at 12:46 p.m. on the 100 East wing hallway, once all the trays were passed to the residents. The puree and regular food items were tasted by the surveyors and the DM as well as the DM took temperatures of the foods at this time. The puree asparagus had multiple strings and thin pieces throughout the portion on the plate. During a concurrent interview with the DM, DM acknowledged the strings in the puree asparagus and stated they should not be there. During an interview with the Food Service Worker (FSW) 1 on 3/5/26 at 12:59 p.m., FSW 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain infection prevention and control program for a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment for three of 12 sampled residents (Residents' 46, 47, and 79) when:1.Handheld nebulizer (HHN) masks (a medical device accessory that covers the nose and mouth, allowing patients to inhale aerosolized medication directly into the lungs) for Resident 46 and Resident 47 were not labeled with the date it was first used and was observed placed directly on top of each resident's bedside table.These failures had the potential for Resident 46 and Resident 47 to be exposed to cross contamination (unintentional transfer of harmful germs or allergens from one surface or object to another) when the nebulizer masks were used by the residents.2. Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) did not wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE-specialized clothing, equipment, and supplies worn by healthcare staff to protect residents and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-06 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure essential equipment was maintained in safe operating condition when: one of two kitchen ovens were not working and unable to be used. This failure to have an operational oven could result in the food taking longer to cook resulting in delayed meal times, inconsistent food quality, and inefficient workflows. The facility census was 66. Findings:1. During an observation on 3/4/26 at 10:06 a.m., Food Service Worker (FSW) 2 was preparing three hotel pans of chicken enchiladas with red sauce and one quarter hotel pan with chicken enchiladas with green sauce. All pans were placed in one of the kitchen ovens. During an interview on 3/4/26 at 11:42 a.m. with FSW 2, FSW 2 stated only one oven was working and the nonworking oven has not worked for about five months. FSW 2 stated she was told it could not be fixed and now they just had to try to time things and just use the one oven. During an interview on 3/5/26 at 9:30 a.m. with the Maintenance Director (MD), the MD stated the oven pilot had went out last week…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a comfortable environment for four of 31 sampled residents (Residents 14, 41, 51, and 80), when vertical blinds had missing slats, horizontal blinds were broken, and resident room walls had scratches and missing paint. These failures created an environment that was not homelike and had the potential to decrease the residents mood and potentially lead to depression.Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/5/26 at 3:27 p.m. with Resident 41 in her room, Resident 41 was lying in bed on her back with the sun streaming on her face. Resident 41 stated, . the sun shines off the cars in the parking lot and right into my face from the hole in the blinds, it causes me to get a headache. The blinds have been broken since I was admitted .During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/5/26 at 3:28 p.m. with Resident 80's family member in her room, Resident 80's family member stated, In my home I would not have so many…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with dignity and respect in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for one of three sampled residents (Resident 79), when Resident 79's urinary catheter (tube inserted into the bladder through the urethra [urine tube], to drain urine freely into a connected bag) bag was not placed in a dignity bag (a bag the catheter drainage bag is placed into, to cover the resident's urine from view).This failure resulted in Resident 79's urinary catheter bag to be uncovered in full view for others to see and having the potential for Resident 79 to feel his privacy and dignity were not respected.Findings:During a review of Resident 79's admission Record (AR), dated 03/6/26, the AR indicated, Resident 79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included Acute kidney failure (kidney suddenly stop cleaning the blood), obstructive and reflux uropathy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician informed consent (the process in which residents are given information of the possible risk and benefits of psychoactive medications (change brain function, altering perception, mood, consciousness, and behavior) for the use of psychotropic medications (medication capable of affecting mind, emotions and behavior) was obtained for one of six sampled residents (Resident 32), when Resident 32 was administered lorazepam (medication used to treat anxiety (excessive, persistent fear or worry that interferes with daily life)) on 3/1/26 and 3/2/26 and informed consent was not obtained prior to medication administration.This failure resulted in Resident 32 to be administered psychotropic medication and not be fully informed of the risks and benefits and did not have the knowledge to make an informed decision which placed Resident 32 at potential risk for negative side effects. During a concurrent observation and interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a new Preadmission screening and Resident Review (PASARR- a federal requirement to ensure resident with mental disorder or intellectual disorder or intellectual disabilities are not inappropriately placed in a nursing home) level 1 screening for one of six sampled residents (Resident 6) when Resident 6's PASARR level 1 dated 9/9/24 completed prior to admission to the facility did not include diagnosis of psychosis (a severe mental condition in which thought, emotions are so affected that contact is lost with reality) and depression (a serious, persistent mood disorder) and use of psychotropic medication (drugs that affect the mind, emotions, and behavior).This failure had the potential for Resident 6 to not receive the appropriate services related to her diagnoses and medication used. Findings: During a concurrent observation, and interview, on 3/3/26 at 12:05 p.m. in the dining room with Resident 6, Resident 6 was observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive, person-centered care plan (a plan that provides direction for individualized care of the resident) was developed and implemented to meet the identified needs for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 41), when Resident 41 did not have a care plan for their arm sling (a supportive device-usually a fabric pouch with a strap-used to hold an injured arm, wrist, or shoulder still against the body). This failure placed Resident 41 at risk for delayed healing by not identifying and monitoring for compliance with the arm sling. Findings: During a review of Resident 41's admission Record (AR-a document containing pertinent resident profile information), dated 3/6/26, the AR indicated Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included fracture (define) of the right femur (long bone of the leg), fracture of the right patella (knee cap), fracture of the humerus (long bone of the arm), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards of quality of care for three out of six sampled residents (Residents' 11, 48, and 65) when:1.Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3 signed the electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR- legal record of drug administration to a patient at a facility by a health care professional) prior to administering Resident 11 and Resident 65's received their medications. These failures resulted in inaccurate charting and placed Resident 11 and Resident 65 at risk to not receive the medications ordered.2.Registered Nurse (RN) 1 did not shake the inhaler (handheld, pressurized device that delivers a specific, measured dose of medication) before he gave it to Resident 48 to self administer.This failure had the potential to result in Resident 48 not receiving the accurate dose of medication which could lead to Resident 48 not experiencing relief of his condition.Findings: 1. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services which ensured the administration of medications to meet residents needs were met for one of 10 sampled residents (Resident 31), when Resident 31's buspirone (medication used to treat anxiety (feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness, often accompanied by physical symptoms)) medication was not available during medication pass on 3/5/26.This failure had the potential for Resident 31's anxiety behavior to increase which could result in serious medical conditions such as worsening of anxiety, panic episodes, insomnia, irritability, dizziness, headache, and nausea. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/3/26 at 11:23 a.m. during initial tour in Resident 31's room, Resident 31 was lying in bed, watching television and talking with another resident in bed next to Resident 31's bed. Resident 31 was appropriately dressed and stated his only concern was the food. Resident 31 stated he felt safe in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0801 — isolatedEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and review of facility documents, the facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manager (DM) received frequently scheduled consultation from the Registered Dietitian (RD). Failure to have the RD provide frequent oversight and consultation with the DM of food and nutrition services can result in a lack of the RD identifying system issues regarding menus and recipes not being followed, food not in the proper form, and lack of competent staff and ensuring development of a prompt action plan to resolve the issues for the health and safety of the 66 residents admitted to the facility. Cross Reference F802, F803, F804, F805.Findings:During a series of observations and interviews that identified multiple failures to deliver food and nutrition services safely and effectively on 3/3/26 through 3/5/26 indicated the facility RD lacked familiarity with the food and nutrition service operation in relation to:a. During an observation on 3/3/26 at 12:01 p.m.of the lunch meal service, in the meal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and review of facility documents, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed for a renal diet for one sampled resident (Resident 15) during the lunch meal service on Tuesday, March 3, 2026. This failure had the potential to result in the resident exceeding the micronutrients in the physician's prescribed therapeutic diet order which may compromise the nutritional and medical status of the resident.During an observation of the lunch meal service on 3/3/26 at 12:01 p.m., in the meal cart, a concurrent review of Resident 15's lunch meal ticket showed a renal, consistent carbohydrate diet, regular texture and thin liquids with a scoop plate as the adaptive equipment. During a further review of Resident 15's meal ticket at the same time, indicated three ounces of pot roast, 1/2 cup white rice, 1/2 cup mixed vegetables. It was observed on Resident 15's lunch tray there was a scoop plate with three ounces of pot roast, 1/2 cup of mashed potatoes, and 1/2 cup mixed vegetables. During an observation with concurrent interview with the Food Service…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-08 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide two of three residents (Resident (R)47 and R62) or their responsible party, reviewed for hospital transfers out of a total sample of 36 residents a written bed hold when R47 and R62 was transferred to the hospital. This failure had the potential to cause confusion or distress regarding return to the same room after hospitalization. Findings include: Review of facility's policy titled Admission, Transfer and Discharge Notice of Bed Hold Policy Before/Upon Transfer revision date 11/2018 indicated, .The facility will provide written information to the resident or resident representative specifying the duration of the state bed-hold policy, if any, during which time the resident is permitted to return and resume residence in the facility.This information will be provided to the resident and the resident representative before a transfer or therapeutic leave and at the time of transfer of a resident for hospitalization or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide three of three residents (Resident (R)41, R47 and R62) reviewed for hospital transfers out of a total sample of 36 residents' notification to the ombudsman when R41, R47 and R62 transferred to the hospital. This failure placed the resident and their representative at risk of having incomplete information, misunderstanding the reason of transfer/discharge, and the discharge appeal process. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Admission, Transfer and Discharge Notice Requirements Before Transfer/Discharge dated 07/2018, read in part .10. Notifications to the Office of the State LTC [Long Term Care] Ombudsman will occur before or as close as possible to the actual time of a facility-initiated transfer/discharge. 1.Review of R41's undated Face sheet located in the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R41's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plan to include refusals for weekly weights for one resident (Resident (R)41) out of a sample of 36 residents. Refer to F692. Findings include: Review of R41's admission Record from the electronic medical record (EMR) Profile tab showed a facility admission date of 10/11/21 with medical diagnoses that included Hydronephrosis with Renal and Ureteral Calculous Obstruction, Dysphagia, Anemia and Muscle Weakness. Review of R41's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/18/24, located in the resident's EMR under the MDS tab indicated the facility assessed R41 to have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 12 out of 15, indicating R41 was cognitively alert. Review of R41's Care Plan, located in the resident's EMR section titled Care Plans, revealed the resident had a care plan with revision date of 08/01/24. The care plan identified the resident had focus for R41 was at risk for altered nutrition/hydration status and/or weight fluctuations.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and a review of the facility policies, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident (R)25) in a total sample of 30, received a range of motion care and treatment. Specifically, the facility failed to provide restorative aide care per R25's care planned intervention to prevent further contractures of her right hand. Findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Restorative Nursing Program, undated revealed, .The Restorative Nursing Program (RNP) is designed to assist the facility team help residents to achieve and maintain their highest functional level . the RNP has two general purposes (a). the program may be used to help residents restore function . (b). to assist residents to maintain function or prevent, to the extent possible, or minimize functional declines .RNPs do not require a physician order .RNP activities may be provided by designated RNAs (Restorative Nursing Assistants, Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) .If the resident or representative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of five residents (Resident (R) 41) reviewed for nutrition had weekly weights obtained after a significant weight loss. This failure had the potential for residents to lose a significant amount of weight without interventions which could have adverse health effects. Findings include: Review of R41's admission Record from the electronic medical record (EMR) Profile tab showed a facility admission date of 10/11/21 with medical diagnoses that included Hydronephrosis with Renal and Ureteral Calculous Obstruction, Dysphagia, Anemia and Muscle Weakness. Review of the NSG Skin and Nutrition Review, located under the Evaluations tab of the EMR, dated 05/31/24stated the reason for the review was significant/grad weight loss/gain. Comments section stated R41 weight history: 05/22/24: 136 lbs (-5#/-3.7% x 1 week, not sig), 5/10/24:145 lbs and 4/27/24: 148 lbs (-17#/-11.5% x 1 mon, sig) Significant weight loss noted in the past 1 month likely related to poor intake secondary to food consistency. PO…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and review of the facility policies., the facility failed to ensure staff followed enhanced barrier precautions and standard nursing precautions while providing wound care for one of one resident (Resident (R)19) out of a sample size of 30. Specifically, facility staff failed to follow personal protective equipment (PPE) guidelines properly and did not use a clean barrier surface for wound care supplies when providing bilateral wound care to R19. This facility failure had the potential to cause further infection to the resident's wounds. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Control Enhanced Barrier Precautions, not dated, revealed, Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention used to reduce transmission of multi drug-resistant organisms . EBP is an extension of standard precautions utilized for resident . Review of the facility undated policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, revealed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity for four of six sampled residents (Resident 1, 2, 3 and 5) when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 disrespectfully responded to Resident 1, 2, 3 and 5. This failure resulted in Resident 1, 2, 3 and 5 feeling disrespected. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/24/24 at 2:48 p.m. with the Social Services (SS), Resident 1's Grievance Form (GF) dated 4/11/24 was reviewed. The GF indicated, .[Resident 1] complain that CNA [1] is rude, calls me girlie and not with respect. Resident request to go to bed right after dinner and CNA stated I have to care for other people you are not the only one . The SS stated CNA 1 was re-educated on customer service. During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/24/24 at 2:50 p.m. with the SS, Resident 2's Grievance Form (GF) dated 5/15/24 was reviewed. The GF indicated, .[Resident reported that CNA [1] made a comment during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality, for one of four sampled residents (Resident 4), when Resident 4 had a fractured (break or crack) left fifth finger (pinky) on 5/19/24 and a splint (immobilizer) was not placed until 5/20/24. This failure placed Resident 4 at risk for further damage to his fractured left fifth finger. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/24/24 at 2:35 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2, Resident 4's Interdisciplinary Notes (IDT) dated 5/21/24 was reviewed. The IDT indicated, .On 5/19/2024, during routine nail care, the C N A [Certified Nursing Assistant] noted that resident's left 5th digit [finger] is swollen with blackish discoloration. Charge Nurse assessed the affected site right away . Notified MD and ordered X-ray [picture of bone] to be done on the left fingers. Result came with findings . Fracture .left fifth middle NP [Nurse Practitioner] on call was notified on 5/19/2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a resident-centered comprehensive care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 with known behavior of physical aggression was left unsupervised on 4/23/24. This failure resulted in Resident 1 punching Resident 2. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (document containing resident demographic information and medical diagnosis) undated, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnosis included Alzheimer ' s (affects memory, thinking and behavior), major depression and anxiety. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/6/24 at 10:00 a.m. with Resident 1, in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 was lying on his bed. Resident 1 did not recall the altercation on 4/23/24. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool used to identify resident cognitive and physical function) Assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 did not have duloxetine (medication for depression) available for three days and licensed nurses did not follow up with pharmacy to check the order status. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk to experience anxiety, irritability, difficulty in sleeping, and possibly nightmares. Findings: During on observation on [DATE] at 5:33 p.m. in Resident 1 ' s room, Resident 1 was seated in her wheelchair. Resident 1 stated she has not received duloxetine for three days because the facility ran out of her medication. Resident 1 stated the medication was working well and since she stopped taking the medication, she experienced nightmares. During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (FS, a document with demographic, personal and medical information) undated, the FS indicated Resident 1 had diagnoses which included anxiety and major depression.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-04 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure grooming needs were met for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) and Licensed Nurses (LNs) failed to provide Resident 1 with fingernail care to keep nails groomed as indicated in the facility's policy titled, Quality of Life Activities of Daily Living. This failure resulted in Resident 1's care needs unmet and placed Resident 1 at risk for developing injury and/or infections. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/24/23, at 9:49 a.m., with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, in Resident 1's room, Resident 1's fingernails on her left hand were long and untrimmed. CNA 1 stated Resident 1's fingernails should be trimmed and filed. CNA 1 stated Resident 1 was unable to trim her nails independently and it was the CNA's and Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN's) responsibility to trim Resident 1's nails. CNA 1 stated Resident 1's nails should have been trimmed to prevent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-05-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. An undated opened whole milk 2 percent (% - a unit of measurement) gallon was placed in a plastic container containing ice and ready for use in the food preparation counter. 2. An undated with no use by date bag of hamburger patties were stored and ready for use in freezer 2 of the kitchen. 3. Two undated and open plastic bags of white bread, one bottle of ground spice pimiento, and one bottle of salt were stored and ready for use in the condiments shelves in the kitchen. These failures to ensure effective dietetic service operations placed residents that received meals from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness and the growth of microorganisms. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 5/22/19, at 8:15 a.m., in the kitchen, an undated gallon of opened whole milk 2 percent was placed in a plastic container with ice and ready for use on the food preparation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-05-28 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have an effective Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI- a program that enables the facility to evaluate and improve the quality of resident care and services through data collection, staff input, and other information) program when: 1. Four out of five staff which included: Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 6, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 5, CNA 6 and LVN 2 were unable to identify the purpose of the QAPI program or the current facility QAPI projects. These failures resulted in an ineffective QAPI program necessary to improve quality of care provided to residents and ensure adequate staff knowledge of the facility QAPI program and QAPI project improvements plans. Findings: 1. During an interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 6 on 5/28/19, at 5:23 p.m., LVN 6 stated she did not know what QAPI was and could not state what QAPI project the facility was currently working on. During an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity and in an environment that prootes and enhances the quality of life for two of three sampled residents (Resident 17 and Resident 15) when: 1.Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 stopped assisting Resident 17 during lunch and Resident 17 waited to be fed while watching other residents to be fed. This failure violated Resident 17's right to a dignified existence and had the potential to result in Resident 17 to experienced weight loss. 2. Resident 15's upper body parts and brief were exposed while resting in bed. This failure violated Resident 15 right to be treated with respect and dignity. Findings: 1. During an observation on 5/22/19 at 12:26 p.m in the dining room, Resident 17 sat in her wheelchair and there were two other residents in the dining table who was getting assistance with their meals. CNA 1 stopped assisting Resident 17 and CNA 1 stood up and left Resident 17 in the dining…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations for one of 51 sampled residents (Resident 353) when Resident 353's call light was not within reach and hung on the wall outlet. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 51's needs to go unmet. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 353, on 5/22/19, at 10:30 a.m., in Resident's 353 room., Resident 353 laid in bed with her call light clipped on the wall outlet and was not within her reach. Resident 353 stated she did not know where her call light was and could not find the call light from her position in bed. Resident 353 stated she would have to yell for help if she needed help from staff. During a concurrent observation and interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, on 5/22/19, at 10:35 a.m., CNA 1 stated Resident 353's call light hung on the wall outlet and was not within Resident 353's reach. CNA 1 stated, [Residents'] call light should always be within reach to prevent accidents or falls and to meet [residents'] needs.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-28 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect the privacy of personal information for one of three sampled residents (Resident 51) when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 left the protected health information (PHI) exposed to public view. This failure resulted in the potential for unauthorized access to personal information and violated Resident 51's rights to confidentiality. Findings: During an observation on 5/22/19 at 8:14 a.m. in the facility's west wing hallway, the computer on the medication cart was left open and unattended by LVN 1. The computer screen displayed Resident 51's name, photo, date of birth , vital signs (reflect essential body functions, including your heart rate, breathing rate, temperature, and blood pressure), room number, allergies, physician orders and medications visible to everyone who passed by the medication cart. During an interview with LVN 1 on 5/22/19 at 2:40 p.m., LVN 1 stated the computer screen displayed Resident 51's name, photo, date of birth , vital signs, room number, allergies, physician orders and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with professional standard of practice for one of three sampled residents (Resident 39) when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 5 did not follow the facility's medication administration policy and procedures and administered an incorrect dosage of ascorbic acid (vitamin c) to Resident 39. This failure resulted in Resident 39 not receiving the appropriate dosage of ascorbic acid as prescribed by the Medical Director (MD). Findings: During a medication administration observation on 5/22/19, at 8:50 a.m., in the facility's east wing hallway, LVN 5 administered one tablet of 250 milligrams (mg- a unit of dry measurement) ascorbic acid to Resident 39. During a concurrent interview and record review with LVN 5, on 5/22/19, at 2:30 p.m., LVN 5 reviewed Resident 39's physician's order dated 5/15/18 which indicated, .Ascorbic Acid tablet Give 500 mg by mouth two times a day related to Nutritional Deficiency . LVN checked the ascorbic acid bottle which indicated, .ascorbic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three sampled residents (Resident 30 and Resident 51) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, comprehensive person centered care and the residents' choices to enable residents to maintain their highest practicable level when: 1. For Resident 30, the facility failed to assess, document and inform the Medical Doctor (MD) when Resident 30's Carvedilol (tablet 3.125 mg [milligrams - unit of measurement] a medication to treat high blood pressure) medication was not given 13 times in January 2019, 14 times in February 2019, 16 times in March 2019, 11 times in April 2019 and seven times in May 2019 for low blood pressure. 2. For Resident 51, the facility failed to assess, document and inform the MD when Resident 51's Carvedilol 6.25 mg and Lotensin (a medication to treat high blood pressure) 5 mg was not given four times in April 2019 and 16 times in May 2019 for low blood pressure. These…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 7 followed the facility policy and procedure titled, Medication Administration for two of two sampled residents (Residents 26 and 21) when LVN 7 administered physician ordered medications two hours before medications were due for administration for Resident 26 and Resident 21. These failures resulted in Resident 26 and Resident 21's sleep interruption and caused Resident 26 and Resident 21 to feel tired and frustrated. Findings: During an interview with LVN 7, on 12/7/18, at 1p.m., LVN 7 stated she began her 6 a.m. medication administration pass at 3 a.m., LVN 7 stated the facility policy and procedure titled, Medication Administration, dated, 8/20/18 indicated medications may be administered one hour before or one hour after the scheduled medication administration time. LVN 7 stated she was aware of the standard of practice of administering medications one hour before or one hour after the scheduled administration time. LVN 7 stated passing medications two hours earlier than the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure titled, Medication Storage Guidance when the medication refrigerator temperature which stored drugs and biologicals was not monitored and documented on 5/21/19 on the morning shift temperature log. This failure had the potential for drugs and biologicals stored inside the medication refrigerator to decreased its effectiveness. Findings: During an observation on 5/22/19, at 9:49 a.m., in the medication room, the medication room refrigerator temperature was not documented for 5/21/19 morning shift. The medication refrigerator contained three vials of pneumovax vaccine (fights bacteria against pneumonia, blood infections, and bacterial meningitis-infection in the brain) one Engerix vaccine (immunization against infection caused by Hepatitis B-liver infection), three Tuberculin test (a tool for screening tuberculosis), three insulin aspart vials (a rapid acting insulin used to lower blood sugar level), two vials of regular insulin (a short acting insulin used to lower blood sugar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurately documented in accordance with the facility policy and procedure and accepted professional standards of practice for one of one sampled residents (Resident 30) when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4 did not document the accurate diagnosis for Resident 30's laboratory (lab) orders. This failure resulted in an inaccurate medical record for Resident 30. Findings: During a review of the clinical record for Resident 30, the face sheet (a document containing resident profile information) undated, indicated, Resident 30 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hypothyroidism (a disorder where the thyroid gland does not produce sufficient thyroid hormone and can cause sensitivity to cold and hot temperatures) and polyneuropathy (damage to multiple nerves outside of the brain and central nervous system. During a concurrent interview and record review with the Facility Nurse Consultant (FNC) on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective infection control program for 1of 2 sampled residents (Resident 47) when Resident 47's urinal was unlabeled, undated, had yellow, sticky substance on the handle and hung on the side of the garbage can. These failures had the potential to place the Residents 47 at risk for cross contamination and exposure to infectious organisms. Findings: During an observation on 5/22/19, at 10:30 a.m., in Resident 47's room, Resident 47 sat on the seat of his wheelchair. Resident 47's urinal was unlabeled, undated, had a yellow, sticky substance on the handle and hung at the side of the garbage can. Resident 47's urinal contained 50 milliliters (ml- a unit of measurement) of yellow liquid. During a concurrent observation and interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, on 5/22/19, at 10:45 a.m. in Resident 47's room, LVN 1 stated Resident 47's urinal was unlabeled, undated, had urine on the handle of the urinal and should not be hanging at the side of the garbage can. LVN 1 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$46,118 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $46,118 — penalty dated 2024-01-30
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AVALON HEALTH CARE — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
The other 15 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVALON OF CALIFORNIA LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 09/09/2003 |
| AVALON CARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 09/09/2003 |
| AVALON HEALTH CARE INC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2003 |
| DANGERFIELD, DAVID | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 04/05/2007 |
| KIRTON, BYRON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 08/27/2024 |
| KIRTON, HYRUM | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/29/2022 |
| KIRTON, SPENCER | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 08/27/2024 |
| WOLTIL, ROBERT | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 05/23/2012 |
| BORISEVICH, MARIA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/08/2024 |
| HASH, ALAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/15/2017 |
| SMITH, NICOLE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2023 |
| AVALON HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2003 |
| DELOITTE TAX LLP | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2020 |
| EIDE BAILLY LLP | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2021 |
| HHC HOLDCO LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/04/2025 |
| OMNICARE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2023 |
| RELIANT PRO REHAB LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2019 |
| KAUR, RAJBIR | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/13/2022 |
| SADJE, ROSE-ANN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/05/2024 |
| VEERAPPA, NANDEESH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 45 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $370K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055839. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.