Garden Village
206 South Tenth Avenue, Yakima, WA 98902 · Non profit - Corporation · 101 certified beds · (509) 453-4854 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (64) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $74,671 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-29)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (70%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.0% | 14.2% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.1% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 1.0% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 9.5% | 17.7% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.0% | 2.6% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.3% | 17.2% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.7% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 74.7% | 93.8% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.1% | 4.3% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.8% | 22.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 48.0% | 15.1% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.7% | 1.3% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 40.4% | 82.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 12.5% | 19.9% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 24.7% | 13.4% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 63.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.2%CMS range 7.1–17.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 63.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 43.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 36.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.60 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 101 beds and averages 87.6 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.14 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.83 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.78 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
64 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 50 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received assessments and supervision for 2 of 5 residents (Resident 84 and 143) reviewed for elopement/missing person, implement risk assessments and supervision for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 73) reviewed for hot liquids, and implement safety interventions for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 12) reviewed for smoking to prevent accidents and hazards. This failed practice placed residents at risk for accidents, injuries, and the potential risk of fire. The lack of a system to ensure the elopement process was followed timely, resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) when Resident 84 went missing from the facility between the hours of 11:30 PM on [DATE] and 2:00 AM on [DATE], and was later located at 8:11 AM on [DATE] deceased in the community. Additionally, Resident 73 experienced harm when they were served hot coffee without a lid and suffered a second-degree burn (involves the first two layers of skin, may present as deep…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess for change in conditions related to skin and constipation, follow hospice and physician orders, and obtain and report labs for 7 of 8 residents (Residents 83, 79, 12, 5, 4, 30, and 68) reviewed for quality of care. These failures placed all residents at risk for delay of treatment, unmet care needs, and negative health outcomes. Resident 83 experienced harm when they obtained a facility acquired pressure injury (PI, localized damage to the skin and underlying soft tissue, usually occurring over a bony prominence or related to medical devices). Additionally, Resident 79 experienced harm when they continued to have seizures when they did not receive medications indicated for seizures in a timely manner. Findings included . Review of a policy titled Skin Integrity dated 08/2018, showed staff would monitor the resident's skin and be alert to potential changes. The policy showed the changes would be reported and treatment interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-10-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from significant medication errors for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 54) reviewed for hospitalization. Resident 54 experienced harm when they received an antipsychotic medication (a class of drugs used to treat symptoms of psychosis and other mental health disorders) that caused acute toxic encephalopathy (indicates brain dysfunction caused by toxic exposure in the absence of primary structural brain disease) and increased sleepiness that resulted in a four-day hospitalization. Findings included . Review of Lippincott's Guide to Preventing Medication Errors dated 11/15/2002, showed the five rights of nursing drug administration are the right patient, the right drug, the right dose, the right route, and the right time. <Resident 54> Review of the medical record showed the resident admitted with diagnoses to include dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning that interferes with daily life and activities). The 08/07/2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to effectively implement and evaluate line-of-site supervision to prevent abuse or mistreatment for 4 of 7 residents (Resident 2, 3, 4, and 5) reviewed for sexual abuse. The failure to consistently implement supervision interventions to potentially prevent four sexual abuse incidents in a seven-day period resulted in Resident 4 experiencing psychological harm when the sexual abuse triggered post-traumatic stress suicide ideation, and Resident 5 experiencing psychological harm when applying the reasonable person approach. Additionally, this deficient practice placed all residents at risk for sexual and psychological abuse and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's state reporting log showed four resident-to-resident altercations, dated 09/24/2023, 09/25/2023, 09/28/2023, and 09/30/2023, involving Resident 1 as an Alleged Perpetrator (AP) and Residents 2, 3, 4, and 5 as Alleged Victims (AV). <Resident 1> Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from verbal and physical abuse for 1 of 8 residents (Resident 2) reviewed for abuse investigations. This failure placed residents at risk for further abuse, injury, and diminished quality of life. Findings included.Record review of the facility's policy titled, Freedom from Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation revised on 09/13/2022, showed the facility would keep residents free from abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property.Resident 1A record review showed Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including stroke (when the blood supply to part of the brain is interrupted or reduced, preventing brain tissue from getting oxygen and nutrients), anxiety disorder (the mind and body's reaction to stressful, dangerous, or unfamiliar situations) and depression. The resident was discharged on 05/26/2026.Review of a 04/26/2026 comprehensive assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assisted with activities of daily living (ADLs) for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 2) reviewed for ADLs. Failure to provide assistance with bathing to residents who were dependent on staff for provision of such care, placed the residents at risk for poor hygiene, embarrassment, impaired skin integrity, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included.Record review of the facility's policy titled, Quality of Life, dated 11/2017, showed the facility would provide the necessary assistance to provide good personal hygiene that included bathing to resident's dependent on staff for their ADLs. If residents refuse assistance with their ADLs, staff were to document the refusal in the resident's medical record. Resident 2 Record review showed Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure (a progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles), respiratory failure and recent cervical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, 1) proper temperatures were consistently monitored accurately and legible for 3 of 4 months reviewed for meals temperatures and 2) equipment surfaces were cleaned and sanitized for 1 of 1 kitchen. This failed practice placed residents at risk for food borne illness.Findings included.Review of the 07/2018 policy titled, Food and Nutrition Services Food Safety, showed the facility would monitor foods for bacterial growth by checking the times and temperatures of foods to ensure safety. During a concurrent interview and record review on 09/02/2025 at 9:22 AM, Staff Y, Dining Services Director, stated they expected food temperatures to be obtained when food was taken out of the oven, right before it was served out, and at the end of serve out to monitor how well the food held heat in the warmers. Staff Y stated the food logs were not completed fully or accurately. A review of the kitchen's food temperature logs showed: In June 2025, 11 out of 93 meal temperatures were not accurately completed with an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, sanitary (the conditions that affect hygiene and health) and comfortable homelike environment regarding, A) the cleanliness of resident room Packaged Terminal Air conditioners (PTAC, a through-the-wall system that provides independent heating and cooling to a localized area) units for 3 of 7 resident rooms (301, 302 and 304), reviewed for environment cleanliness, B) soiled shower room ventilation and holes in wall tiles for 1 of 3 shower rooms (300's hallway) reviewed for environment, and C) a gouge (a hole or indentation) in a resident room flooring for 1 of 3 resident rooms (Resident 12) reviewed for a safe environment. This failure placed residents at an increased risk of injury and dissatisfaction with their living environment. Findings included. Review of the facility's policy's titled, Resident Rights Safe, Clean and Comfortable Environment, dated July 2018, showed the facility would provide housekeeping and maintenance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure components of their infection prevention/control program, to prevent the development and transmission of infections with, A) the facility's water management program Legionella (a bacteria that can cause a severe respiratory disease) testing protocols, and identification of control measures (actions or steps taken) to reduce the potential growth/spread of pathogens (bacteria, virus or other microorganisms that can cause diseases) were developed/implemented for 1 of 1 water management program (WMP) reviewed for infection control, B) hand hygiene and glove change when completing resident cares for 3 of 10 staff (Staff AA, BB, K) reviewed for infection control, and C) the cleaning/disinfecting of the facility's environmental surfaces and isolation precautions room (preventative measures used to reduce the transmission of infectious bacteria and organisms in the healthcare setting) with an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from interference/coercion (the use of expressed or implied pressure to compel someone to act against their will) in a manner that promoted and/or supported the resident's individual choice in respect to their quality of life, without fear of reprisal, regarding the residents choice to smoke a cigarette for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 4) reviewed for the resident rights. This failed practice placed the resident at risk of increased confusion and/or frustration with facility staff regarding their individual choice to smoke and unmet care needs.Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled, Physical Environment Smoke Free Facility, revised February 2025, showed the facility was designated as a smoke-free building and a smoke-free campus that would extend to the perimeters of the facility's property. The policy showed that residents smoking paraphernalia (items like cigarettes, electronic cigarette,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to protect the personal privacy for 2 of 4 residents (Residents 34, 72) observed for incontinent brief change and blood glucose checks (a blood test that measures the level of glucose (sugar) in the blood, the test can involve a finger prick, a nurse collects a drop of blood, the test involves a test strip and glucometer (glucose meter) with results in seconds). This failure placed the residents at risk for loss of the right to personal privacy. Findings included . Record review of the facility policy, Resident Rights Privacy and Confidentiality, dated 07/2018 showed each resident had the right to privacy during personal care and medical treatments. Resident 34 Review of a comprehensive assessment, dated 05/22/2025, showed Resident 34 had severe cognitive impairment, dementia (a loss of mental ability severe enough to interfere with normal activities of daily living) and an anxiety disorder (the mind and body's reaction to stressful,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor person-centered behaviors and obtain informed consent when they received psychotropic medications (medications capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 9 and 27) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failed practice placed residents at an increased risk of receiving medications they did not want or they no longer needed and inadequate dosing of medications. Finding included . Resident 9 Review of Resident 9's medical records showed they admitted on [DATE] with multiple mental health diagnoses to include violent behaviors, hallucinations (false perception of objects or events involving your senses that seem real, but they are not), depression (a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest in activities that were once enjoyable), and anxiety (a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease, typically about an imminent event or something with an uncertain outcome). The 06/10/2025 comprehensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow up on written notices of bed holds, (holding or reserving a resident's bed while the resident was absent from the facility) with resident and/or resident representatives (RR), given at the time of hospital transfers for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 27 and 82) reviewed for the discharge process. This failure placed the residents at risk for lack of knowledge regarding their right to hold their bed, any monetary charges associated with the bed hold while in the hospital and disallowed the resident and/or their representative an opportunity to fully understand the rationale/resident rights associated with the discharge. Finding included .Review of the facility's policy titled, Notice of Bed Hold Policy Before/Upon Transfer, revised November 2018, showed the facility would provide written information to the resident or RR on the bed hold policy, the reserve bed payment policy, policies regarding bed hold duration periods and information related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the safety and supervision of 1 of 3 residents (Resident 61) reviewed for accident risks. The facility's failure to implement their missing resident protocol when Resident 61 did not return from an outing with family at their indicated time put the resident's health and safety at risk. Findings included.Review of an undated facility policy titled, Actions for Suspected Resident Elopement/Missing Resident, showed when a resident had signed out and not returned to the facility at the indicated time, they were considered a missing resident. The protocol required the charge nurse to immediately make several telephone calls to locate the missing resident as follows: 1) Call the resident's contact phone number provided by the responsible person at sign out, 2) Call the Administrator and Director of Nursing Services (DNS) if unable to make direct verbal contact with the resident, 3) Call 911 (emergency services) and request a well-check at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 50 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently implement interventions for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 9) reviewed for nutrition. This failure placed the resident at risk for continued significant weight loss and the loss of nutritional satisfaction. Findings included.Resident 9 Review of Resident 9's medical records showed they admitted with diagnoses to include dementia (a loss of thinking, remembering, and reasoning skills), malnutrition (inadequate intake of protein and/or energy over prolonged periods of time resulting in loss of fat stores and/or muscle wasting) and most recently, neck and tonsil cancer (06/06/2025, a disease in which some of the body's cells grow uncontrollably and spread to other parts of the body). The 06/10/2025 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 9's cognition was moderately impaired, was independent for eating, complained of difficulty or pain with swallowing, and had no issues with weight loss. Additional review of Resident 9's medical records showed the resident had received weekly chemotherapy (a drug…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 residents (Resident 9) were free of unnecessary drugs due to lack of monitoring and care planning of high-risk cancer (a disease in which some of the body's cells grow uncontrollably and spread to other parts of the body) medication. This failed practice placed the resident at risk of adverse side effects and unmet care/personal needs.Findings included.Review of Lippincott Nursing Procedures 8th edition, dated 2019, titled Chemotherapeutic [a drug that kills cancer cells] Drug Administration, Special considerations, showed for 48 hours after receiving a chemotherapy drug, the resident's feces and urine would be contaminated and required special handling for washing clothes and linens and feces and urine, and hand washing would be completed often. The guidelines showed healthcare workers who were pregnant, were trying to become pregnant, or breast-feeding should not be exposed to chemotherapy drugs. The guidelines showed adverse side effects (ASE) were unique to the medication being administered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program ensuring that flies (an insect that can develop/breed in various environments, rapidly reproduce and known for spreading diseases) were not entering/gathering in hallways and resident rooms for 1 of 4 Hallways (Hall 3 [H3, 300's rooms]) reviewed for environment. This failure placed the resident at risk of infection, infestation (the state of being overrun by pests) and unmet care needs. Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled, Physical Environment Safe, Functional, Sanitary Environment, dated July 2018, showed the facility would maintain an effective pest control program (measures to eliminate and contain common household pest like roaches, ants and flies) to control pests and rodents.Resident 12 Review of the medical record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including kidney complications, history of a stroke with dysarthria (speech disorder that occurs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0851 — isolatedElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, was electronically submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), for 1 of 3 quarters (3rd quarter of 2024), reviewed for Payroll Based Journal (PBJ, mandatory reporting of staffing information based on payroll data) submission. This failure caused the CMS to have inaccurate data related to nursing home staffing levels and had the potential to impact resident care and services. Findings included . Review of the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports (CASPER) Payroll-Based Journal Staffing Data Report showed the facility failed to report data for the period of July 1, 2024, through September 30, 2024, as required. During an interview on 04/16/2025 at 1:42 PM, Staff C, Business Office Manager, stated that they were responsible for reporting the PBJ data in 2024. The 3rd quarter report was the last one they transmitted, and now corporate accounting were responsible. During a telephone interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician and resident representative for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 2) reviewed for falls. This failure placed the resident at risk for a delay in medical treatment and of not having a resident representative involved in health care decision making. Findings included . Record review of the facility's policy titled, Notification of Changes of Condition, dated 07/2018, showed that the facility would inform the resident representative and the resident's physician changes in condition or accidents resulting in injury. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Accident Hazards Supervision Devices, dated 07/2018, showed that when a resident experienced a fall, the facility would assess for injuries, provide necessary treatment, address risk factors and revise the resident's care plan as needed. <Resident 2> Record review showed Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include cerebral vascular accident (stroke,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was revised for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for care plan revisions after a significant change. This failure placed the residents at risk for injury and unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of a policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, dated 11/2017, showed the care plan was comprehensive, person-centered, and would drive the type of care and services a resident would receive. The care plan would describe the resident's medical, nursing, physical, mental and psychosocial needs and preferences, and how the facility would assist in meeting those needs. The Minimum Data Set [(MDS) a federally mandated assessment tool that helps nursing homes evaluate the health and functional capabilities of their residents] would be used to assess the resident's clinical condition, cognitive and functional status, and use of services in developing the comprehensive care plan. The care planning process…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-29 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there were sufficient numbers of nursing staff to provide care and services for 17 of 17 residents (Residents 293, 245, 79, 2, 11, 1,19, 49, 71, 5, 83, 18, 51, 84, 3, 244 and 54). These failures placed residents at risk of not having their needs met and potential negative outcomes to their physical and mental health. Findings included . < F 636 Resident Comprehensive Assessments and Timing> The facility failed to ensure resident admission Minimum Data Sets (MDS, a required assessment and care planning tool) were completed within the required timeframes. <Resident 293> Record review of Resident 293's medical record showed an admission MDS had an admission Assessment Reference Date (ARD, refers to the specific endpoint for the observation [or look-back] periods in the MDS assessment process) of 09/29/2024. Review of the MDS completion date showed it was not completed until 10/22/2024 (27 days after the admission and 13 days late). <Resident 245> Record review of Resident 245's medical record showed an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to identify and properly discard foods after the expiration date for 1 of 1 dry food storage rooms and 1 of 1 walk in refrigerators reviewed for kitchen and food safety. This failure placed the residents at risk for food borne illness (fever, chills, stomach cramps, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting caused by the ingestion of contaminated food and/or beverages). Findings included . Review of the facility's 07/2018 policy titled Food and Nutrition Services, Food Safety showed dry foods will be rotated and refrigerated foods will be labeled, dated and discarded on the expiration date. An observation on the initial kitchen tour with Staff R, Dietary Manager, on 10/15/2024 at 8:20 AM, showed the refrigerator and dry storage room contained the following expired foods: -Two-pound bag organic greens, unopened, expired on 10/07/2024 -Three-pound box of Spring mix salad blend, unopened/unsealed, expired on 10/03/2024 -Two-pound bag Greens Fresh Onions, unopened, expired on 10/13/2024 -Two boxes of green mountain coffee…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-29 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a written notice to the resident and/or their representative of the discharge for 5 of 5 residents (Residents 5, 54, 67, 18, and 51) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet discharge needs. Findings included . <Resident 5> Review of the medical record showed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include left breast cellulitis (a bacterial skin infection that causes swelling, pain, warmth and redness) and a skin infection to their pannus (excess skin and fat hanging down from the abdomen). The 08/07/2024 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 5's cognition was intact. Review of nursing progress notes showed the resident was sent to the hospital on [DATE] due to increased redness, pain, and swelling to their breasts. Resident 5 readmitted back to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 5's discharge documents showed no notice of transfer had been given to the resident or the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-29 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY <Resident 67> Review of Resident 67's medical record showed they admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include dementia (a loss of mental ability severe enough to interfere with normal activities of daily living), anxiety (the mind and body's reaction to stressful, dangerous, or unfamiliar situations), and liver cirrhosis (severe scarring of the liver). The 06/30/24 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 67 was independent for activities of daily living and had severe impaired cognition. Record review showed Resident 67 had a change of condition on 10/03/2024 and was transported to the hospital emergency department followed by a six day stay at the hospital. Record review showed no bed hold information communicated to the resident or their representative at the time of the transfer to the hospital on [DATE]. During an interview on10/24/2024 at 11:40 AM, Staff J stated they recalled sending Resident 67 to the hospital on [DATE]; however, they did not provide the bed hold notice to the resident or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-29 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a required assessment and care planning tool) assessments within the regulatory timeframes for 6 of 6 residents (Residents 2, 11, 1, 19, 49 and 71) reviewed for timeliness of assessments. The failure to ensure resident assessments were completed timely placed the residents at risk for delayed care planning, unidentified care needs and services, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of the 10/2023 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI, a manual that directs staff on requirements for completion of MDS's) showed the quarterly Assessment Reference Date (ARD, refers to the specific endpoint for the observation (or look-back) periods in the MDS assessment process) should be completed no later than 92 calendar days from the previous quarterly MDS. <Resident 2> Record review of Resident 2's medical record showed Resident 2's quarterly MDS with an ARD of 09/06/2024 and showed it was completed on 10/11/2024 (35 days late). <Resident 11> Record review of Resident 11's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure that dependent residents received assistance with dressing, personal hygiene, and shower/bathing for 4 of 5 residents (Resident 5, 83, 18, and 51). This failure placed the residents at increased risk for skin breakdown and unmet care needs. Findings included . <Resident 5> Review of the medical record showed the resident admitted with diagnoses to include diabetes (a chronic condition the occurs when the body has high levels of sugar in the blood) and kidney failure. The 08/09/2024 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 5's cognition was intact and required substantial to maximum assistance for hygiene and bathing. During an interview on 10/15/2024 at 10:40 AM, Resident 5 stated they were frustrated because they would like to have a shower more than twice a week but would like to at least get the two a week they were scheduled for. Resident 5 stated their shower days were on Wednesdays…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to serve meals that were at a safe temperature and appetizing for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 3 and 1) reviewed for food quality. This failed practice placed the residents at risk for decreased nutritional intake and food borne illness. Findings included . Review of the undated policy titled, Record of Food Temperatures, showed that food was to be served in such a manner that temperatures were safe and acceptable to residents. The hot foods would be held at a minimum of 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F- a unit of measure) and cold foods would be held at a maximum of 41 degrees F. Further review showed that no food will be served that does not meet the food code standard temperatures. <Resident Council> During a resident council meeting on 10/16/2024 at 10:02 AM Residents 51, 71, 8, 7 and 28 were in attendance 3 of the 5 residents reported the following concerns: Resident 51 stated they had not had a hot meal in years., Resident 71 stated the food was cold and the breakfast was the worst and always cold. Resident 8 stated the food was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff compliance with current infection control guidelines and standards of practice by staff not following the guidance for a sign that was posted on the transmission based precaution (TBP) rooms for donning (putting on) personal protective equipment (PPE); and not adhering to fit testing (to ensure a proper fit) guidelines for an N-95 respirator (a respiratory protective device designed to achieve a very close facial fit and very efficient filtration of airborne particles) for 3 of 5 staff (Staff AA, T, and K). During a COVID- 19 (an infectious disease-causing respiratory illness with symptoms including cough, fever, new or worsening malaise, headache, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, loss of taste or smell, and in severe cases, difficulty breathing, that could result in severe impairment or death) outbreak. These failures placed residents at an increased risk for exposure to cross contamination (harmful spread of illness)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident, Resident Representative (RR), or payee were notified when their personal funds account reached a balance that was below $200 of the Social Security Income (SSI, a monthly Social Security benefit for people with low incomes, limited resources and who are blind, disabled or 65 or older) resource limit of $2000, for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 64) reviewed for personal funds. This failed practice placed the resident at risk of losing their Medicaid (a federal system of health insurance for those requiring financial assistance) or SSI eligibility. Findings included . Review of a policy titled Heritage Grove Trust Procedures dated 10/29/2024, showed the facility must inform the resident or the Resident's Representative (RR) when their trust balance was within $200.00 of the social security limit of $2000.00 and a copy of notification would be put in the resident's financial file. The policy also showed the Social Services Director (SSD) would be notified. <Resident 64> Review of the resident's medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Resident's Representative (RR) was fully informed of a change of condition for 2 of 4 residents (Resident 68 and 79) reviewed for nutrition. The facility failed to inform the RR of severe weight loss. This failure denied the RR the right to be involved and make decisions regarding the care and treatment of the resident. Findings included . <Resident 68> Record review showed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include dementia (a loss of mental ability severe enough to interfere with normal activities of daily living), anxiety disorder (the mind and body's reaction to stressful, dangerous, or unfamiliar situations) and failure to thrive (a progressive functional deterioration of a physical and cognitive nature). Review of the 08/23/2024 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a required assessment and care planning tool) showed that the resident had a weight of 149 pounds (lbs, a unit of weight measurement), had no weight loss,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the personal privacy for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 245) observed for incontinent care and 1 of 1 resident (Resident 293) observed after a fall. This failure placed the residents at risk for loss of the right to personal privacy. Findings included Record review of the facility's policy titled, Privacy and Confidentiality, dated 07/2018, showed that each resident had the right to privacy during personal care. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Respect and Dignity, dated 09/20/2022, showed that the residents had the right to be treated with respect and dignity. <Resident 245> Record review showed Resident 245 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include stroke (when the blood supply to part of the brain is interrupted or reduced, preventing brain tissue from getting oxygen and nutrients), depression, and pain. Review of the incomplete comprehensive admission assessment showed that on 10/04/2024 the resident had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to report an incident involving a missing resident in a timely manner to local law enforcement (LLE) and the State Agency (SA) as required for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 143) reviewed for missing persons. This failure disallowed an opportunity for LLE to assist in the search of Resident 143 and placed the residents at risk for harm related to unrecognized and uninvestigated abuse and/or neglect. Findings included . A review of the Nursing Home Guidelines or The Purple Book, dated October 2015 showed that facilities were required to report a missing resident to Law Enforcement and the State Agency Hotline in a timely manner. <Resident 143> Review of the medical record showed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including stroke (occurs when blood flow to the brain is cut off, which can damage and kill brain cells), frontal lobe deficit (causes personality changes, difficulty concentrating or planning, impulsivity), and psychoactive substance abuse (the use of illegal/legal drugs or alcohol for purposes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of staff-to-resident abuse, for one of five sampled residents (Resident 4), reviewed for abuse. The failure to complete a thorough investigation placed the resident at risk for potential abuse and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . Review of the facility policy dated 11/2017, titled, Freedom from Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation showed when the facility had identified abuse, the facility should take appropriate steps to remediate the noncompliance and protect residents from additional abuse immediately. The policy discussed the need for taking steps to prevent further potential abuse, report the allegation to appropriate authorities within required timeframes, and conduct a thorough investigation of the allegation. <Resident 4> Review of the medical record showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia (a loss of mental ability severe enough to interfere with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident admission Minimum Data Sets (MDS, a required assessment and care planning tool) were completed within the required timeframes for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 293 and 245) reviewed for admission assessments. Failure to complete admission within the required timeframes placed residents at risk for a delay in identification of care needs and/or unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI, a manual that directs staff on requirements for completion of MDS's) showed the admission Assessment Reference Date (ARD, refers to the specific endpoint for the observation (or look-back) periods in the MDS assessment process) should be completed no later than the 14th calendar day of the resident's admission (admission date + 13 calendar days). <Resident 293> Record review showed Resident 293 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include respiratory failure, bipolar disorder (a mood disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a significant change assessment had been completed for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 79) reviewed for hospice and end of life care. This failed practice placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs due to their imminent decline in health. Findings included . Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument Manual (RAI, a manual directing staff on how to accurately assess the status of residents), dated 10/2023, showed a significant change assessment was required when a resident was placed on hospice for a terminal prognosis, with a life expectancy of six months or less. <Resident 79> Review of the resident's medical record showed the resident admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include malnutrition (an imbalance between the nutrients your body needs to function and the nutrients it gets), delusions (fixed, false conviction in something that is not real or shared by other people), and hallucinations (an experience in which you see, hear, feel, or smell something that does not exist). The 07/15/2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement comprehensive resident centered care plans for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 73 and 18) reviewed for care planning in the areas of accident prevention and edema (extra fluid in the body caused by conditions such as heart failure, liver disease, and kidney disease). This failed practice put residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included . <Accident Prevention> <Resident 73> Record review showed Resident 73 was admitted with diagnoses to include dementia (a loss of mental ability severe enough to interfere with normal activities of daily living), and depression. Review of the 08/14/2024 comprehensive assessment showed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and was independent with meals. Record review of a 11/06/2023 nursing admission assessment showed Resident 73 was identified at a safety risk when drinking hot beverages and required lids on their coffee cups. Record review of Resident 73's care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer (PU, localized damage to the skin and underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence. The injury can present as intact skin or an open ulcer and may be painful) for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 293) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This failure placed the resident at risk for worsening of the wound, increased discomfort and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Record review of the facility's policy titled, Skin Integrity, dated 08/2018, showed that the facility would provide care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers, promote healing and prevent new ulcers from developing. Pressure ulcers would be staged according to professional standards of practice. Review of The National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) April 2016, showed Pressure Ulcer Stages as follows: • Stage 1- Intact skin with a localized area of non- blanchable erythema…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 51), reviewed for restorative nursing and limited range of motion [(ROM) the extent the joint can move within the expected (normal) range of values]. This failure placed the residents at risk for a decrease in mobility, developing/worsening of contractures (a permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and surrounding tissues that causes the joints to shorten and stiffen), and unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of a policy titled, Restorative Nursing programs, revised 06/2018, showed the goal of the Restorative Program was to assist residents in obtaining and maintaining their highest practicable functional levels, prevent unnecessary declines, and provide an active and healthy living environment. <Resident 51> Review of the medical record showed Resident 51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include quadriplegia (complete…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently monitor or implement interventions per Registered Dietician (RD) recommendations for 2 of 4 residents (Residents 79 and 83) reviewed for nutrition. This failure placed the residents at risk for continued significant weight loss and the loss of nutritional satisfaction. Findings included . <Resident 79> Review of the resident's medical record showed they were admitted with diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder (a mental health disorder with symptoms of delusions [fixed, false conviction in something that is not real or shared by other people] and hallucinations [an experience in which you see, hear, feel, or smell something that does not exist]) and malnutrition (an imbalance between the nutrients your body needs to function and the nutrients it gets). Review of the 07/15/2024 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 79's cognition was severely impaired and required set-up assistance for eating. During an observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dialysis services met professional standards of care for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 193) reviewed for dialysis (the kidneys no longer function and require a process to remove waste and excess fluids from the blood stream). This failure placed residents receiving dialysis at risk for unmet care needs and medical complications. Findings included . The facility's policy titled Quality of Care Dialysis, dated 05/2019, showed the facility would provide residents who require dialysis care and services consistent with professional standards of practice. The facility and the dialysis center would collaborate to assure that the resident's needs related to dialysis treatments were being met. There would be ongoing communication and collaboration between the nursing home and dialysis staff for the development and implementation of the dialysis care plan. <Resident 193> Review of Resident 193's medical record showed the resident was admitted to the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and discarded when expired on one of two medication carts (Halls 1 and 2) and one of two medication rooms (Main Nurse's station), reviewed for medication storage. This failure placed the residents at risk for receiving compromised or ineffective medication. Findings included . <Main Nurse's Station> A concurrent observation and interview on 10/22/2024 at 3:46 PM, showed as follows: • two glucagon (a medication that controls sugar in the blood) shots that expired on 08/20/2024 and 06/05/2024, and one unlabeled glucagon shot. • 50 Needles Size 18 gauge (refers to the thickness of the needle and the size of the hole that the medication passes through) expired 08/31/2024. • Resident 16's Valproic Acid (a brand of medication used for seizures) one full bottle, and one opened bottle with 200 milliliters (ml, a unit of measure) that expired on 06/22/2024 Medication refrigerator: • 12 hemorrhoidal suppositories (a medication used…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident's medical record was complete and accurately documented their Physician Orders for Self-Sustaining Treatment (POLST, a form that communicates a person's wishes for health care treatments during a medical emergency) for 2 of 3 residents (Resident 67, 73) reviewed for advanced directives. This failure put residents at risk for staff not knowing if they want cardiopulmonary resuscitation, (CPR, an emergency, lifesaving procedure) or do not resuscitate, (DNR, an order that a person had decided not to have CPR if their breathing and heart stopped.) Findings included . Record review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Records - Identifiable Information, 07/2018, showed that the facility would maintain a complete and accurate medical record in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices. <Resident 67> Medical record review showed Resident 67 was admitted with diagnoses to include chronic obstructive pulmonary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from verbal and physical abuse for 1 of 6 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for abuse. This failure placed the resident at risk for further abuse, injury, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Record review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated 09/20/2023, showed that the facility will provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by prohibition and prevention of abuse. <Resident 1> Review of the medical record showed Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including dementia (a loss of mental ability severe enough to interfere with normal activities of daily living), anxiety (the mind and body's reaction to stressful, dangerous, or unfamiliar situations) and depression. Review of the 03/01/2024 comprehensive assessment showed that the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance from staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0851 — isolatedElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate direct care staffing information was submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), for 1 of 1 quarter (3rd Quarter, 2023), reviewed for Payroll Based Journal (PBJ - mandatory reporting of staffing information based on payroll data) submission. This failure had the potential to impact resident care and services for all residents. Findings included . Review of the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports (CASPER) Payroll-Based Journal Staffing Data Report showed the facility reported 27,934 direct care hours for the period of July 2023, August 2023, and September 2023. Review of the facility's daily staffing assignments for July 2023, August 2023, and September 2023 and employee payroll data validated that the additional 115.71 direct care hours had not been included in the original PBJ submission for the third quarter in 2023. During an interview on 03/19/2024 at 10:40 AM, Staff B, Business Office Manager (BOM), stated that they were able to determine that 115.71…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement effective interventions to protect a resident from physical abuse for 1 of 6 residents (Resident 2) reviewed for resident-to-resident incidents. This failed practice placed all residents in the secured unit of the facility at risk for abuse and/or further abuse, and unmet psychosocial needs. Findings included . <Resident 1> Review of Resident 1's medical record showed the resident admitted to the secured unit of the facility on 09/14/2023 with diagnoses to include Huntington's Disease (a condition that leads to progressive degeneration of nerve cells in the brain that affects movement, cognitive functions, and emotions), and has difficulty speaking, The comprehensive assessment dated [DATE], showed Resident 1's decision making skills were moderately impaired, they had verbal behavior symptoms that were directed towards others that did not impact themselves or others. The assessment further showed the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a process to ensure culturally competent, trauma-informed care related to assessing for a history of traumatic life events or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD, a mental health condition that develops following a traumatic event characterized by intrusive thoughts about the incident, recurrent distress/anxiety, flashback and avoidance of similar situations) and identifying triggers in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 residents (Residents 1) reviewed for trauma informed care. This failure placed the residents at risk for unidentified triggers, re-traumatization, and unmet care needs. Findings included . <Resident 1> Review of Resident 1's medical record, showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia (A group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life), depression, and anxiety (a group of mental health conditions that cause…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food services regarding, 1) Potentially Hazardous Food (PHF, food that requires time/temperature controlled to limit the growth of bacteria) and dry goods that did not have the proper labels and dates for food safety tracking for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed, 2) Staff implementation of standard hygienic practices with not wearing hair nets or performing proper hand washing/glove changing during food preparation for 1 of 1 meal tray serve out, and 3) sanitation of food preparation areas that were not adequately disinfected to prevent cross contamination (harmful spread of diseases) for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed. These failures placed residents at an increased risk for food borne illnesses and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the Washington State Retail Food Code [PHONE NUMBER]6(1)(2)(a,b)(3)(4), dated March 1, 2022 showed ready-to-eat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure implementation of infection prevention and control precautions in the following areas : 1) COVID-19 (an infectious disease causing respiratory illness with symptoms including cough, fever, new or worsening malaise, headache, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, loss of that or smell, and in severe cases difficulty breathing that could result in severe impairment or death) testing of residents, for three 3 of 6 residents (Resident 89, 11, and 13) reviewed for COVID-19 testing; 2) fit testing of N95 (a National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health [NIOSH] approved respirator that has straps around the back of the head to create a tight seal that filters varying levels of particles in the air) respiratory masks for 62 of 147 staff reviewed for N95 mask fit testing; and 3) hand hygiene during COVID-19 testing and meal service for residents. These failures placed the residents at an increased risk for exposure to cross…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure a clean, comfortable living environment for 8 of 8 sampled residents (Resident 23, 78, 83, 68, 34, 86, 60 and 67), including 2 of 2 resident rooms and 2 of 3 hallways reviewed for homelike environment. The failure to 1) ensure the ambient temperature in the secure unit was safe and comfortable, 2) replaced or repaired window trim, and 3) ensure the facility was free from worn carpet and urine odors, placed the residents at risk for injury, compromised dignity, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Ambient air temperature> <Resident 23> Review of the medical record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure and dementia with agitation (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning). The 07/03/2023 comprehensive assessment showed the resident required extensive assistance of two staff members for ADLs. The assessment also showed the resident had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-31 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address concerns that were voiced during resident council meetings, for 6 of 6 months (Febuary 2023 through July 2023) of resident council minutes reviewed. Additionally, Resident 1's representative stated they had not had any response from the facility concerning a greivance for Resident 1. Failure to timely address and implement interventions to address identified concerns, resulted in the Resident Council process being ineffective in improving resident quality of life. Findings included . Review of facility's undated 'Resident Council Meeting' policy showed the liaison (Activity Staff) shall be responsible for providing assistance with facilitating successful group meetings .and act upon concerns and recommendations of the Council, make attempts to accommodate recommendations to the extent practicable, and communicate its decisions to the Council. Additionally, a Resident Representative for (Resident 1) did not recieve a follow up response for a greivance filed on 08/10/2023. This failure placed the residents,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-31 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement abuse prohibition policies and procedures related to 1) screening for 3 of 10 staff (Staff I, J, and K) for background checks, 2) providing thorough and complete training at orientation and before the new staff member had contact with residents for 10 of 15 staff (Staff G, F, Z, BB, EE, KK, LL, MM, NN and TT ), and 3) prevention and protection after a resident to resident altercation for 1 of 6 residents (Resident 89), when the lack of monitoring and implementation of appropriate interventions lead to an alleged perpetrator having access to the victim. These failures placed all residents at risk for potential and/or further abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, and exploitation. Findings included . Review of the facility policies titled Policy and Procedures of Investigating and Reporting Abuse and Allegations of Abuse, dated 03/2014, Abuse/Neglect - Reporting/Response, dated 07/13/2011, and Abuse/Neglect - Identification,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-31 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff had documented competencies (a series of knowledge, abilities, skills, experiences and behaviors, which leads to effective performance of staff regarding resident cares), and skill sets including the demonstration of competency in skills to provide care and services for each resident in accordance with professional standards and individualized resident care needs for 14 of 15 nursing staff (Staff G, F, H, Q, V, Z, BB, EE, KK, LL, MM, NN, TT, and DDD) reviewed for staff competencies. This deficient practice placed all residents at risk of unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of facility's assessment tool dated 04/28/2023 showed the facility evaluated their resident population care needs and identified that staffing training with education and competencies were a necessary requirement in providing the level and type of support/care needed for their residents. Additionally, the facility assessment showed that urinary catheters (a tube that drains urine from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to serve meals that were at a safe temperature and appetizing for 7 of 10 residents (Residents 9, 21, 36, 40, 44, 64 and 68) reviewed for food quality. This failed practice placed all residents at risk for decreased nutritional intake and food borne illness. Findings included . Review of the facility policy and procedure titled, Food Temps, Dated 11/20/2017, showed that food is to be served in such a manner to be attractive and temperatures are safe and acceptable to residents. The policy further stated that they are to deliver food carts to their proper destination immediately. And that Hot foods will be held at a minimum of 140 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and Cold foods will be held at a maximum of 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F). During a resident council meeting on 08/24/2023 at 10:18 AM the following concerns were voiced during the meeting: Resident 21 stated that all they did was wait for meals. Breakfast was not until 9:00 AM. They further stated the food was cold sometimes, I tell them they don't do anything…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-31 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure implementation and maintenance of an effective training program for new or existing staff, prior to staff independently providing services to residents and annually, related to: 1) mandatory effective communications for 7 of 15 staff (Staff Z, BB, KK, LL, MM, NN, and TT), 2) activities that constitute abuse/neglect, procedures for reporting incidents of abuse/neglect and dementia management regarding abuse prevention for 10 of 15 staff (Staff F, G, Z, BB, EE, KK, LL, MM, NN, TT) and, 3) mandatory Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI), for 10 of 15 staff (Staff F, G, Z, BB, EE, KK, LL, MM, NN, TT) reviewed for training requirements. This failure placed residents at increased risk for unidentified abuse/neglect, and inadequate care from unqualified staff. Findings included . Review of facility's assessment tool, dated 04/28/2023, showed the facility evaluated the resident care needs and identified staff training requirements necessary to provide the level and type of support/care needed for their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-31 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documented evidence of the required annual 12-hours of in-service training for 5 of 10 staff (Staff Q, Z, KK, LL, and NN), reviewed for Nursing Assistance (NA) continuing competencies training. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk of being cared for by inadequately trained staff, and unmet care needs. Findings included . <Staff Q> Review of the staff personnel records showed Staff Q, NA, was hired on 08/23/2022. Review of the facility's training records showed Staff Q did not completed the required 12 hours of trainings and/or in-services within the last year. <Staff Z> Review of the staff personnel records showed Staff Z, NA was hired on 12/23/2019. Review of the facility's training records showed Staff Z did not completed the required 12 hours of trainings and/or in-services within the last year. <Staff KK> Review of the staff personnel records showed Staff KK, NA was hired on 12/08/2020. Review of the facility's training records showed Staff KK did not completed the required 12 hours of trainings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience while staff were conversating with each other and not engaged with the residents during mealtime and referred to the residents as feeders for 8 of 8 residents (Residents 3, 19, 80, 41, 43, 79, 36 and 84), reviewed for dining. This failure placed residents at risk to feel diminished and embarrassed. Findings included . Review of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidance §483.10(a)-(b)(1)&(2) in Appendix PP, last revised on 02/03/2023 . for treating residents with dignity and respect while dining, showed staff were to avoid conversing with each other while providing assistance with meals. Staff were to address residents with their name or pronoun of choice and avoid the use of labels such as feeders. Staff were also to refrain from practices that were demeaning to residents. <Resident 3> Review of the resident's 06/09/2023 comprehensive assessment showed they required extensive assistance with one-person physical assistance while eating. The assessment also…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide properly fitted mobility equipment for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 80), reviewed for accommodation of needs for comfort and positioning. This failure placed the resident at risk diminished comfort and dignity. Findings included . <Resident 80> Review of the medical record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including encephalopathy (a brain disease that can cause difficulty in thinking, muscle twitching, weakness, and impulsive behavior) and cachexia (extreme weight loss and muscle loss). The 06/12/2023 comprehensive assessment showed the resident required extensive assistance of one to two staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) and required a wheelchair for mobility. The assessment also showed the resident had a severe impaired cognition. Review of the 05/18/2023 physician orders, showed the resident may have a tilt-in-space wheelchair for comfort. Review of the 03/08/2023 Physical Therapy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical and verbal abuse by another resident and prevent actual and potential further abuse for 1 of 6 residents (Resident 89), reviewed for allegations of abuse. The facility allowed the alleged perpetrator to continue to share a room with the alleged victim after an incident of abuse. This failure placed the resident at risk for further abuse and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's Abuse policy revised date 12/02/2014, showed that abuse was any action that caused injury, intimidation, or punishment to a person including physical, verbal, emotional or mental abuse. <Resident 62> Review of the medical record showed the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including respiratory failure, depression, and agitation. The 08/23/2023 comprehensive assessment showed the resident required limited assistance of one to two staff for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice regarding multiple non-pressure skin wounds that were not consistently assessed, monitored, and/or had wound care treatment completed for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 244) reviewed for non-pressure related skin issues. These failures placed residents at an increased risk for unmet care needs, untreated skin impairments, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Skin Assessment, unknown date, showed that a full body skin assessment would be conducted by a licensed nurse .upon admission/re-admission, daily for three days, and weekly thereafter . and that the assessment was one approach to skin injury prevention and management. Additionally, the documentation of the skin assessment would include the type of wound, observation of skin conditions, description of the wound (measurements, color, type…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 64), reviewed for pressure ulcers. The failure to thoroughly assess, consistently monitor, and/or ensure consistent and timely provision of ordered skin care and treatments placed residents at risk for deterioration in skin condition and decreased quality of life. Findings included . The National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) November 2016, Pressure Ulcer Definition and Stages: A Pressure Ulcer is localized damage to the skin and underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device. The pressure ulcer can present as intact skin or an open ulcer and may be painful. This occurs as result of intense and/or prolonged pressure or pressure in combination with shear (a combination of downward pressure and friction). A Stage 2 Pressure Ulcer:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who had an indwelling urinary catheter (IUC, a tube placed in the bladder which drains urine out into a collection bag) received care and services to prevent urinary tract infections (a condition were bacteria enter through the urinary meatus [a passage or opening leading to the interior of the body] and infect the kidneys or bladder) for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 244), reviewed for urinary catheter care. This placed the residents at risk of developing medical complications, secondary to an infection in the bladder. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Care & emptying of catheter and bag, dated 05/19/2011, showed that during the catheter care process, staff were to perform perineal care (cleaning of the private area, including genitals and rectal areas of the body), then proceed to clean the location where the urethral meatus and the IUC tube meet, cleaning down the tube, away from the residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure pneumococcal vaccines (a vaccine that protects against pneumococcal infections that can lead to serious infections like pneumonia and blood infections) were administered to 5 of 9 residents (Resident 82, 62, 245, 86, and 64) reviewed for immunizations and infection control. This failed practice placed the residents at risk for illness, spread of a communicable disease, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccines, revised on 06/09/2023, showed pneumococcal vaccines would be made available for residents. All residents would receive information related to the risks and benefits of the immunization. The resident record would reflect the provision of education and the administration or refusal of the immunization. The consent or declination would be documented in the resident's medical record. <Resident 82> Review of the medical record showed the resident was admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-09-09 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the nursing staff posting was posted daily and/or reflected the actual nursing staff hours worked during 3 of 3 days of the survey period. This failed practice prevented residents, family members, and visitors from knowing the facility's actual number of available nursing staff. Findings included .During an observation on 09/05/2025 at 10:30 AM, there were no nursing staff postings within the facility available for the residents/resident representatives, staff or visitors to view the actual staff available to provide resident care. During an observation on 09/08/2025 at 1:36 PM, the facility had no nursing staff postings viewable for residents, family or visitors to show actual available staff to provide resident care. The nursing staff posting was found within a binder along with the nursing staff assignments for the day. The nursing staff posting did not reflect any staffing changes. During an observation on 09/09/2025 at 2:38 PM, a nursing staff posting was hanging up in the nursing station, not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-09-09 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment (a required document describing resident population, acuity, and needs to determine staff and other resources necessary to completely care for residents) was updated to include and consider specific staffing needs for each resident unit/each shift and plans to maximize direct care staff recruitment and retention. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included . A review of the Facility Assessment, dated August 2025 did not show documentation of residents' acuity or specific staffing needs (resources) for each resident unit in the facility and staffing needs for each shift. It showed they did not have documentation on how the facility would develop and maintain plan to maximize recruitment and retention of direct care staff. In an interview and record review on 09/04/2025 at 1:40 PM, Staff A, Administrator, stated they reviewed the Facility Assessment annually and as needed, and that they expected it to be completed as required. Staff A stated the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$74,671 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $52,507 — penalty dated 2024-10-29
- $22,164 — penalty dated 2023-08-31
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-12-31 for 29 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AVALON HEALTH CARE — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
The other 15 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YAKIMA VALLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 09/01/2025 |
| MULTICARE HEALTH SYSTEM | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 07/01/2010 |
| OWENS, MAXWELL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| SIEDENSTRANG, LYNN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/01/2023 |
| STENGEL, LAURA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 09/01/2025 |
| HASH, ALAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/12/2025 |
| AVALON CARE CENTER - YAKIMA LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2024 |
| AVALON HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/12/2025 |
| BORISEVICH, MARIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/12/2025 |
| CASTANEDA AVILA, MIGUEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/07/2025 |
| SMITH, NICOLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/12/2025 |
| WATSON, BROOKS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2025 |
| WILSON, HELEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/07/2025 |
| YAKIMA ASSOCIATES LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/14/1996 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $6K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505010. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.