Avalon Care Center Federal Way, L.L.C.
135 South 336th Street, Federal Way, WA 98003 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (253) 835-7453 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.0% | 14.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.8% | 5.5% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 1.0% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 17.7% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.7% | 2.6% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.6% | 17.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 7.3% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.9% | 93.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.3% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 14.4% | 22.5% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.9% | 15.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.3% | 1.3% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 86.6% | 82.0% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.6% | 19.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.7% | 13.4% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.21 | 1.33 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.31 | 1.52 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
58.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 222 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 75.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 126 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 58% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 38% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 58.5%CMS range 52.2–64.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.3%CMS range 6.2–13.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 75.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 76.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 67.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.9%CMS range 4.6–10.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.00 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 109.5 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.28 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.90 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.454 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.50 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.00 to 0.65 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
48 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice for 5 (Residents 11, 82, 69, 13, & 7) of 25 residents reviewed. The nursing staff's failure to clarify and/or follow Physician Orders (PO) and follow medication parameters placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, risk for medication errors, delayed treatment, and potential negative outcomes. Findings included .<Facility Policy>Review of the facility's 12/01/2007 General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration policy, showed prior to administration of medication the facility staff would take all measures required each time a medication was administered; the correct medication, correct dose and correct rate was provided. The policy showed staff would verify the medication name and dose were correct when compared to the medication order on the Medication Administration Record (MAR). <Clarifying physician orders> <Resident 11> According to the 09/11/2025 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 11 had diagnoses including brain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 Percent (%). Failure to properly administer 6 of 32 medications for 3 of 4 residents (Resident 8, 119, & 120) observed during medication pass resulted in a medication error rate of 18.75%. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving the correct dose or receiving less than the intended therapeutic effects of physician ordered medication.Findings included .<Facility Policy>Review of the facility's General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration policy revised on 11/15/2024 showed staff would verify the medication name and dose for accuracy on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) prior to administering medications. <Resident 8> <Vitamin D3 (a supplement)> Observation of medication pass on 11/19/2025 at 8:26 AM showed Staff G (Registered Nurse) administer one 5,000-unit capsule of Vitamin D3 to Resident 8. Record review of Resident 8's physician's orders showed a 09/24/2025 order for Vitamin D3 with directions to administer one 50,000-unit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases. The facility failed to follow precautions signs for 3 of 4 residents (Residents 52, 78, & 7) for Transmission-Based Precautions (TBP) and 2 of 2 residents (Residents 67 & 12) for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) as posted outside resident's rooms and failed to follow hand hygiene (HH) practice for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 8 & 12) during medication administration. These failures to wear PPE (Personal Protective Equipment - gown, gloves and goggles) as instructed on the signs outside resident's rooms and poor hand hygiene practice placed residents at risk for facility acquired or healthcare-associated infections and related complications. Findings included . <Facility Policy>According to a facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP), revised 06/08/2022, the IPCP would maintain a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a mental health screening required prior to nursing home admission) evaluation was incorporated into the Care Plan (CP) for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 13) reviewed for PASRR. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving the necessary mental health services and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .<Resident 13>According to a 08/29/2025 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool), Resident 13 had multiple medically complex diagnoses and was currently considered by the state Level II PASRR process to have a Serious Mental Illness (SMI). This MDS showed Resident 13 received antipsychotic and antidepressant medications during the assessment period.Review of an updated 06/05/2025 Level 1 PASRR showed staff identified Resident 13 had an SMI and required a Level II evaluation. On 07/21/2025 the Level II evaluation was completed with recommendations provided to the facility for Resident 13's plan of care.Review of Resident 13's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update and/or revise Care Plans (CP) as needed for 3 of 25 sample residents (Residents 91, 2 & 69) whose CPs were reviewed. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, inappropriate care, and other negative health outcomes.Findings included . <Resident 91> According to the 11/01/2025 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS – an assessment tool), Resident 91 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medically complex conditions including recent abdominal surgery. The MDS showed Resident 91 was able to transfer and walk 10 feet with supervision or touching assistance, did not use a wheelchair, did not use bed rails, and required a pressure-reducing device for their chair. Review of a 10/29/2025 physical mobility Care Plan (CP) showed Resident 91 required supervision or touching assistance by staff to walk and bilateral mobility bars (bed rails on both sides of bed) to increase mobility were initiated on 11/09/2025. Review of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' ability to communicate was maintained for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 13 & 69) when reviewed for communication. This failure placed the residents at risk of inability to communicate needs, social isolation, feelings of worthlessness, and diminished quality of life.Findings included .<Facility Policy>Review of an 11/2017 facility, Resident Rights policy showed health information and services would be provided in ways that were easy for the resident and/or representative to understand. The facility would offer language assistance services to residents who had limited English proficiency, provide qualified sign language interpreters, or auxiliary (additional support) aids if hearing was impaired.<Resident 13>According to an 08/29/2025 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 13's preferred language was Spanish and the resident needed or wanted an interpreter to communicate with a doctor or health care staff.Review of a revised 09/11/2025 communication Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL), related to cleanliness and grooming for 3 (Residents 70, 17 & 52) of 5 sample residents and 1 supplemental (Resident 69) resident reviewed for ADLs. Facility failure to provide residents who were dependent on staff for assistance with bathing, nail care, and shaving, placed the residents at risk for poor hygiene, long facial hair, embarrassment and diminished quality of life.Findings included .<Facility Policy>According to the facility's 11/2017 Quality of Life- Activities of Daily Living policy, if a resident was unable to carry out ADL's they would receive the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene.<Resident 70> According to the 10/17/2025 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 70 had diabetes, muscular dysfunction and weakness. The assessment showed Resident 70 had no behavior of refusing care during the assessment period and had no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure activity programs met the needs of each resident for 2 of 3 residents (Resident 15 & 69) reviewed for activities. The failure to provide meaningful activities left residents at risk of boredom and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .<Facility Policy>According to the facility's 11/2017 Quality of Life Activities policy, the facility would implement an ongoing activities program to support resident in their choice of activities. The programs would be based on the comprehensive assessment, care plan and the preferences of each resident to support their physical, mental, psychosocial well-being and independence. <Resident 15> According to the 10/08/2025 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 15 had a mood disorder, respiratory failure and weakness. The MDS showed it was very important for Resident 15 to do their favorite activities that included books, newspapers and participation in religious services. The MDS showed it was important to keep up with the news, to listen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide restorative/functional maintenance services for 2 of 4 residents (Residents 5 & 70) reviewed for limited Range of Motion (ROM) and mobility to ensure the residents maintained and/or improved their highest level of functioning. This failure placed residents at risk of further decline in ROM, loss of function, and/or permanent immobility.Findings included .<Facility Policy>According to a revised June 2018 facility Quality of Care Restorative Nursing Programs policy, the facility would assist residents to obtain and maintain their highest practicable functional levels to prevent unnecessary declines and to provide an active and healthy living environment.<Resident 5>According to a10/9/2025 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool), Resident 5 had slight memory impairment, muscle weakness, and functional limitation in ROM to both legs.Review of a revised 10/09/2023 limited physical mobility Care Plan (CP) showed staff were to provide gentle range of motion daily as tolerated. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess the gastrostomy tube (surgically placed tube through the abdominal wall into the stomach to provide nutrition) placement prior to initiating an enteral feeding (feeding through a tube), provide formula timely as scheduled, and failed to follow the physician orders for 1 of 1 residents (Resident 13) reviewed for tube feeding management. This failure placed residents at risk for alteration in nutrition, dehydration, and decreased quality of life.Findings included .<Facility Policy>Review of a 06/2018 facility, Tube Feeding Management/Restore Eating Skills policy showed staff were instructed to collaborate with the dietician for the appropriate method of formula (liquid nutrition) infusion using gravity flow or an infusion pump (device to deliver formula). The policy instructed collaboration of the dietician and nursing staff to validate the administration of formula and water and ensure the rate and volume of infusion followed the physician orders. This policy instructed staff to verify the potency and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 38 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement pharmacy recommendations for 2 of 6 residents (Residents 8 & 69) reviewed for pharmacy recommendations. These failures placed residents at risk of medication errors and adverse health outcomes.Findings included .<Facility Policy>Record review of the facility's November 2017 Pharmacy Services Medication Regimen Review policy showed a pharmacist conducted medication regimen reviews at least monthly to prevent, identify, report and resolve medication-related problems, medication errors, or other irregularities. The facility was to act upon reported irregularities in order to minimize adverse consequences that might be associated with medications.<Resident 8> According to a 09/26/2025 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 8 had recent major orthopedic surgery and required active care during their admission to the facility related to the surgery. Observations during medication pass on 11/19/2025 at 8:26 AM showed Staff G (Registered Nurse) administered one 5,000-unit capsule of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper storage and labeling of medications in 1 of 2 medication storage rooms (West Station Medication Room) and 1 of 3 medication carts (West Two Medication Cart) reviewed for medication storage. This failure placed residents at risk for medication errors or receiving expired medications.Findings included .<Facility Policy>According to the facility's November 2017 Pharmacy Services Labeling and Storage of Drugs and Biologicals policy, all medications would be labeled with an expiration date. The policy showed multi-dose vials would be dated with an open date and discarded within 28 days after opening, unless the manufacturer specified a shorter or longer date for that opened vial. <West Station Medication Room>Observation on 11/18/2025 at 9:17 AM of the [NAME] Station medication storage room showed a bottle of medication used to treat itching with an expiration date of 10/25/2025, and nine bags of IV (intravenous - injected directly into a patient's bloodstream) medications with an expiration date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-05 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess and obtain consent prior to implementing bed rails for 2 (Residents 1 & 2) of 3 sample residents reviewed for bed rails. The failure to assess and obtain consent prior to implementing bed rails resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a cut to their eyebrow and placed Resident 2 at risk for injury. These failures placed all residents at risk for injury and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Resident 1> According to the 10/30/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 1 had diagnoses including an acute condition affecting their brain function that could cause confusion, memory loss, and personality changes. The MDS showed Resident 1 had severe memory impairment. The MDS showed Resident 1 had severely impaired vision and did not use bed rails during the assessment period. The 10/31/24 discharge MDS showed the resident was discharged from the facility and not available for observation or interview. Review of Resident 1's evaluation and documentation tabs in their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-07-24 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP), to promote appropriate use of Antibiotics (ABO), reduce the risk of unnecessary ABO use, and decrease the development of an ABO resistance for 6 of 6 sample residents (Resident 204, 80, 77, 64, 47, & 3) reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk for potential adverse outcomes associated with the inappropriate and/or unnecessary use of ABO's. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to a facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control ABO Stewardship, revised 03/2019, the program would validate that antibiotics were prescribed for the correct indication, the correct dose, the correct route and the correct duration. The policy showed the program would implement a data gathering system and analyze the collected data to ensure unnecessary ABO prescribing did not take place. The policy showed the facility would monitor the use of ABO's using the McGeer's (a set of signs and symptoms that verify active infection) and Loeb's (tool used to assess…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-24 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a system by which residents received required written notices at the time of transfer/discharge, or as soon as practicable for 7 of 7 residents (Residents 94, 31, 1, 20, 26, 23, & 59) reviewed for hospitalizations. Failure to ensure written notification to the resident and/or the resident's representative of the reasons for the discharge in writing and in a language and manner they understood, placed residents at risk for a discharge that was not in alignment with the resident's stated goals for care and preferences. Findings included . <Facility Policy> A facility policy titled, Admission, Transfer, and Discharge - Notice Requirements Before Transfer/Discharge, dated 07/2018, showed a notice of transfer must be provided to the resident/representative when an emergency transfer to an acute care facility is ordered. <Resident 94> Review of Resident 94's 05/10/2024 Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) showed the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY <Resident 6> According to the 06/07/2024 Quarterly MDS Resident 6 was independent with lying to sitting on side of bed, sit to stand, chair-to-bed/bed-to-chair transfer, toilet transfer, and walked ten feet. This MDS showed Resident 6 had intact cognition. During an interview on 07/16/2024 at 9:07 AM Resident 6 stated they transferred from their bed to their wheelchair or walker and back to their bed independently. Review of Resident 6's Potential for Alteration in Activities of Daily Living CP on 07/18/2024 at 8:46 AM showed the CP had contradicting information. One intervention stated the resident required supervision or partial assistance of one staff for transferring. Another intervention stated Resident 6 was able to transfer on their own. Review of Resident 6's bedside Kardex on 07/18/2024 at 9:00 AM showed Resident 6 required substantial to maximal assistance by one staff to turn and reposition in bed, was independent with bed mobility, was able to transfer on their own, and required supervision or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide restorative/rehabilitative treatment/services for 7 of 8 residents (Residents 47, 20, 40, 41, 61, 32, & 59) reviewed for limited Range of Motion (ROM) and mobility to ensure the residents maintained and/or improved their highest level of functioning. This failure placed residents at risk of further decline in ROM, loss of function, and/or permanent immobility. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to a facility policy titled, Quality of Care Restorative Nursing Programs, revised 06/2018, showed Restorative Nursing Programs (RNP) would be developed and/or formalized by a supervising nurse. <Resident 47> According to a 05/31/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool), Resident 47 had functional limitation in ROM to both arms and both legs. The assessment showed Resident 47 did not have any memory impairment. The MDS showed Resident 47 had medically complex conditions which included, but were not limited to,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared, stored, and served under sanitary conditions. Facility staff failed to: consistently perform hand hygiene when preparing resident meal trays; label food items and discard expired food items from unit refrigerators; keep the kitchen dishwasher machine free from grime and debris build up; and maintain accurate documentation for the dishwasher temperature and chlorine chemical logs. These failures contributed to an unsanitary kitchen environment, placed residents at risk for food borne illness, and/or contaminated food. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility's Food and Nutrition Services - Food Safety policy dated 07/2018, showed facility staff would use good hygienic practices when handling food. This policy showed facility staff would follow manufacturer's guidelines based on the type of dishwasher used to sanitize dishware and chemical solutions would be checked for concentration levels at least once per shift. Review of the facility's Food's Brought by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases. The facility failed to ensure staff: consistently performed Hand Hygiene (HH) before and after resident care/contact; apply/remove Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in accordance with the Transmission Based Precaution (TBP- implement precautions based on the means of transmission in order to prevent or control infection) signs posted outside of resident rooms; and implement interventions to prevent Legionnaires disease (a serious severe respiratory infection caused by inhalation of bacteria growing in the water system) within the facility. The facility was unable to provide documentation of completed McGeer's or Loeb's infection surveillance criteria forms for each resident with an infection who received, or was currently on, an antibiotic. These failures placed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-24 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform residents or their assigned representatives in advance of the risks and benefits associated with psychotropic medication therapy (medications capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior), and obtain resident consent prior to implementing the proposed treatments/therapies for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 61 & 34) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The failure of facility staff to obtain consent for psychotropic medications prior to administration detracted from the residents' and/or their representative's ability to exercise their right to make an informed decision about proposed treatments, and prevented the residents and their representative from exercising their right to decline the treatments/therapies. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The facility's revised 10/04/2022 Psychotropic Medication policy showed residents who used psychotropic drugs would be educated on the risks and benefits of psychotropic drug use. <Resident 61> According to the 05/20/2024 admission 5 Day Minimum Data Set (MDS - an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the appropriate Advanced Directives (AD) in place for 2 (Residents 61 & 6) of 7 residents reviewed for ADs. The facility failed to provide information indicating residents were informed, educated, and offered assistance to formulate an AD (Resident 61 and 6), and to obtain guardianship for Resident 61. These failures placed residents at risk of losing their right to have their stated preferences/decisions honored regarding medical treatment and end-of-life care. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The 11/2017 Advanced Directives facility policy showed the resident and/or the resident's representative would be provided with written information regarding the resident's right to refuse or accept assistance with formulating an AD, and this information would be provided in a manner the resident could understand. Nursing staff would document the resident's decision about formulating an AD in the resident's record. Information about…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-24 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to initiate a grievance for 2 (Resident 1 & 47) of 2 resident's reviewed for grievances. The facility's failure to initiate, log, investigate verbalized concerns, and inform the resident of their findings and the actions taken, precluded the facility from identifying grievance trends and placed the resident at risk of feeling frustrated, unimportant, and with a decreased self-worth and quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to facility policy titled, Resident Rights - Grievances, dated 08/2018, the facility would help residents/representatives file grievances and would investigate and take appropriate actions to address resident grievances. The policy showed grievances could be submitted in writing or orally. The policy showed the administrator has designated the Social Services representative in the facility as the Grievance Officer (GO). The policy showed the GO had the responsibility to oversee the grievance process, receive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-24 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document they communicated necessary resident information to the receiving health care institution or provider for 2 of 7 residents (Resident 1 & 31) reviewed for hospitalizations. Failure to ensure necessary resident information was communicated to the hospital placed residents at risk for decreased quality of care, inadequate care/treatment, and decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to a facility policy titled, Admission, Transfer, & Discharge - Facility initiated Transfers, or Discharges, dated 11/2017, showed when the facility initiates a transfer or discharge of a resident, the facility would document in the resident's record appropriate information was communicated to the receiving health care institution or provider. The policy showed information would be provided to the receiving provider and will include the following: a. Contact information of the practitioner responsible for the care of the resident b.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system that ensured residents who were transferred to the hospital or went on therapeutic leave were provided a written notice of bed hold that specified the duration of the bed hold policy upon transfer or attempted to contact the resident and/or the resident representative within 24 hours from an emergency transfer for 2 (Resident 59 & 23) of 7 sampled residents reviewed for hospital transfers. This failure placed the residents at risk for lack of knowledge regarding their right to hold their bed while hospitalized . Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the Admission, Transfer, and Discharge - Notice of Bed Hold Policy Before/Upon Transfer facility policy revised 11/2018, the facility would provide information regarding the resident's right to hold their bed at the time of transfer or within 24 hours of the transfer if the transfer was emergent. <Resident 59> According to the 05/29/2024 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-24 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) was completed within 14 days from the date of determination for 1 (Resident 68) of 1 resident reviewed for significant changes in status. The failure to identify the need for a SCSA when Resident 68 had a decline in condition and was started on hospice services placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to the Resident Assessment Instrument manual (a document directing staff when assessments of resident status is required) a .SCSA is required to be performed when a terminally ill resident enrolls in a hospice program (Medicare Hospice or other structured hospice) and remains in the nursing home. <Resident 68> Review of Resident 68's 04/05/2024 Hospice Certification and Plan of Care showed Resident 68 admitted to hospice services on 04/05/2024 for a diagnosis of protein - calorie malnutrition and the inability to absorb nutrients from food. This certification showed Resident 68 was terminally ill…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-24 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) assessments were completed accurately for 1 (Resident 61) of 5 residents reviewed for PASRR screening. The failure to ensure PASRR screening was complete and accurate left residents at risk for inappropriate placement and/or not receiving timely and necessary services to meet their mental health care needs. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's revised 08/2018 Resident Assessment - PASRR for Mental Disorder (MD) and Intellectual disability policy, all residents must have a PASRR screening prior to admission, and the facility would keep a copy of the screening in the resident's record. The policy showed the facility's Social Services department was responsible for ongoing maintenance of accurate PASRR screenings and PASRR screening should be updated as needed to reflect changes both positive and negative to a resident's mental health status. This policy showed if a PASRR level I was positive, with any MD or a related condition, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice for 4 (Residents 66, 32, 59, & 67) of 20 residents reviewed. The nursing staff's failure to follow and/or clarify Physician Orders (POs), and notify the provider of resident refusals of treatment, placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, and potential negative outcomes. Findings included . <Clarifying Physician Orders> <Resident 66> According to the 05/08/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 66 received nutrition through a feeding tube (a tube surgically placed in the stomach used to administer artificial nutrition). Review of Resident 66's order summary on 07/23/2024 at 12:45 PM showed Resident 66 had a 02/29/2024 diet order of NPO (nothing by mouth). Review of Resident 66's March 2024 through July 2024 Medication Administration Records (MARs) on 07/23/2024 at 12:45 PM showed Resident 66 had a 03/10/2024 PO for an anti nausea medication, a 03/26/2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident 61) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for communication, including language and speech, were provided a functional system to address their communication needs. Failure to identify and provide services which enhanced and or ensured effective communication, placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, social isolation, and a diminished sense of well-being. Findings included . <Resident 61> According to the 05/20/2024 admission 5 Day Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool), Resident 61 admitted to the facility on [DATE], had impaired memory, was never able to understand others, and had unclear speech. The assessment showed Resident 61 had no behavior or rejection of care during the assessment period. Observations on 07/16/2024 at 9:40 AM, and 07/17/2024 at 11:59 AM showed Resident 61 was lying in their bed in their room. During an interview on 07/17/2024 at 11:59 AM, Resident 61 mumbled and was unable to make themselves…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL), related to cleanliness and grooming for 2 (Residents 61 & 62) of 20 sample residents reviewed for ADLs. Facility failure to provide residents who were dependent on staff for assistance with shaving (Resident 61), and nail care (Resident 62), placed the residents at risk for poor hygiene, long facial hair, embarrassment and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's 11/2017 Quality of Life- Activities of Daily Living policy, the facility would provide ADLs in accordance with resident's comprehensive assessment, Care Plan (CP), and resident preferences to ensure a resident's ADL abilities do not diminish unless decline in function was unavoidable. <Shaving> <Resident 61> According to the 05/20/2024 admission 5 Day Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 61 admitted to the facility on [DATE], had impaired memory, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 20 residents (Residents 41, 67, & 59) reviewed, received the necessary care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice, and the comprehensive person-centered care plan. The facility failed to complete weekly skin checks and provide the treatment for 2 of 4 residents (Residents 41 & 67) reviewed for non-pressure ulcers and failed to accurately set air mattress setting according to resident's weight for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 59) reviewed for air mattress setting. These failures placed residents at risk for decline in medical status, unmet care needs, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's revised 08/2018 Quality of Care policy, the facility would ensure care plans included resident care needs and described the services and care required; ensure residents with non-pressure-related skin ulcers/wounds were assessed by a clinician, including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident 41) of 5 residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers (PU's) received the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, and prevent new ulcers from developing. Failure of the facility to consistently complete weekly skin assessment, assess skin integrity to identify PUs timely, and implement interventions to include updating the Care Plan (CP), placed Resident 41 at risk to develop new PU, and diminished quality of life. <Facility Policy> According to the facility's 08/2018 Quality of Care- Skin Integrity policy, the facility would assess residents upon admission and thereafter, to identify if the resident had existing PU's or was at risk for developing PUs. A resident at risk for developing PUs would have individualized interventions implemented to prevent new PUs from developing. The policy showed the resident's CP would reflect the treatment strategies for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment was free of accident hazards for 1 of 8 (Resident 68) sample residents reviewed for accident hazards. The failure to assess devices such as wedges placed Resident 68 at risk for accidents, injury, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's Quality of Care - Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices policy dated 07/2018, the facility would provide an environment that was free from accident hazards. This policy showed risks and benefits of assistive devices that could pose an entrapment risk would be considered prior to implementing the device. <Resident 68> According to the 06/20/2024 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 68 had severely impaired thought processes. The MDS showed Resident 68 had a progressive memory loss disorder and was receiving end-of-life services. This assessment showed Resident 68 admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to obtain consent for Bed Rails (BR) for 3 (Residents 1, 297, & 20) of 3 residents reviewed for BR's. Facility failure to attempt alternatives before implementing BR's, assess residents for safe use of BR's, or obtain informed consent for the use of BR's placed all residents at risk for harm or injury and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to a facility policy titled, Resident Rights Planning and Implementing Care, dated 11/2017, the residents had the right to be informed of their treatment and care. The policy stated staff would inform residents in advance of the treatment risks and benefits, options, and alternatives. According to a facility policy titled, Quality of Care - Bed Rails, the facility would attempt alternative measures prior to utilizing BR's and if it was determined the alternative measures were not effective, the facility would assess the resident for risks of entrapment. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed pharmacist's monthly Medication Regimen Reviews (MRRs) were added to resident records and that recommendations were reviewed and carried out in a timely manner for 3 of 5 residents (Residents 32, 67, & 34) whose medication regimens were reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk for delays in necessary medication changes, at risk for adverse side effects, and negative outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's Pharmacy Services - [MRR] policy dated 11/2017, the facility would develop a system by which medication irregularities would be acted on in order to minimize adverse consequences to the resident. This policy showed the pharmacist would conduct monthly MRRs. Any irregularities would be provided in a separate report and reviewed by the physician, medical director, and director of nursing. The irregularities would be responded to in a timely manner dependant on the nature of the concern. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 (Residents 24 & 32) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, were free from unnecessary psychotropic (medication that affected behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) medications. This failure left residents at risk for unnecessary medications, adverse side effects, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility's Pharmacy Services - Psychoactive Medication policy revised 10/04/2022, showed the facility implemented Gradual Dose Reductions (GDRs) unless contraindicated, prior to initiating, or instead of continuing a psychotropic medication. The policy showed supportive documentation included but was not limited to consideration of other factors addressed prior to initiating a psychotropic medication or in conjunctions with GDRs. <Resident 24> According to the 07/01/2024 Medicare 5 Day Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 24 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent (%). Failure of 1 of 5 nurses (Staff N - Licensed Practical Nurse) to properly administer 2 of 25 medications for 1 (Resident 203) of 8 residents observed during medication pass resulted in a medication error rate of 8%. This failure placed residents at risk for adverse side effects and/or not receiving prescribed medications as ordered. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility's General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration policy revised 01/01/2013 showed the facility staff administering the medication should ensure the resident's consumption of the medication. <Staff N> Observation on 07/18/2024 at 9:02 AM showed Staff N preparing to administer morning medications to Resident 203. Staff N brought Resident 203 their morning medications. As Resident 203 took their medications, 2 medication tablets dropped in the resident's lap. Staff N did not notice and started to leave the resident's room. At that time, the surveyor stopped…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were secured for 3 (Resident 90, 23, & 52) of 21 sample residents observed with medications in their rooms. These failures placed residents at risk for receiving the wrong medications, contaminated medications, and non-assessed, self-administration of medications by residents. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's Storage and Expiration of Medications, Biologicals, Syringes, and Needles policy revised 10/31/2016, the facility would store bedside medications or biologicals in a locked compartment within the resident's room. This policy showed the facility would not provide bedside medications or biologicals without a Physician's Order (PO). <Resident 52> Observation on 07/18//2024 at 8:38 AM showed Resident 52 in bed. The facility's contracted wound team entered Resident 52's room to provide a treatment to Resident 52's skin. Resident 52's windowsill contained several skin treatments and ointments including a tube of antibiotic ointment, wound cleansing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-04-28 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 out of 1 walk-in freezers was maintained in satisfactory working condition. The freezer temperature logs indicated the temperature was elevated for a month prior to the start of the survey and there was a leak in a pipe resulting in substantial ice buildup in the freezer. Although service visits were made a couple of weeks prior to the survey, the freezer continued to be out of temperature range and with significant ice buildup, without additional follow-up being implemented. This failure placed residents at risk for spoiled food. Findings included . Review of the 07/20/2023 Food and Nutrition Services Food Safety policy revealed, Food items would be stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety .Frozen foods would be maintained at a temperature to keep the food frozen solid. In an initial kitchen inspection with Staff V (Dietary Manager) on 04/25/2023 at 9:12 AM, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-28 · tag F0569 — patternNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure funds were reimbursed to the state Office of Financial Recovery (OFR), within 30 days of resident discharge or death, for 2 (Residents 161 & 162) of 4 discharged residents reviewed. This failure caused delay in reconciling resident accounts within 30 days as required. Findings included . <Resident 161> Record review showed Resident 161 was discharged on 01/17/2023. Review of trust fund records showed the resident had a balance of $60.41, which was not transferred to the OFR until 12/12/2022, 11 months after discharge. <Resident 162> Record review showed Resident 162 was discharged on 05/22/2022. Review of trust fund records showed the resident had a balance of $431.52, which was not transferred to the OFR until 10/31/2022, five months after discharge. In an interview on 04/27/2023 at 2:48 PM, Staff P (Business Office Coordinator) stated trust funds should be dispersed to the OFR within 30 days of a resident's discharge. Staff P confirmed the funds for Resident 161 and 162 should have, but were not dispersed within 30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-28 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer/discharge to the State Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 110 & 109) reviewed for discharge. The failure to have an established system of discharge notification to the LTCO placed all discharged residents at risk for lack of information about discharge, access to an advocate who could inform them of their options and rights, and risk for a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 110> A [DATE] progress note showed Resident 110 had a resident-initiated discharge from the facility to a private home. A [DATE] release form showed Resident 110 left the facility against medical advice. <Resident 109> A [DATE] progress note showed Resident 109 was deceased . A [DATE] release form showed Resident 109 was discharged and transferred to a funeral home. In an interview on [DATE] at 8:21 AM, Collateral Contact (CC) from the LTCO stated there was no notification of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-28 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the bed-hold notice (a document detailing the duration, cost, and conditions of return, when holding a bed while the resident was at the hospital) for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 57 & 62) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed residents at risk for being uninformed and unable to exercise the right to hold their bed while in the hospital. Findings included . The 11/2018 Facility Policy for Notice of Bed Hold showed residents were notified of the bed hold policy at the time of transfer or within 24 hours if the transfer was an emergency. The policy showed the bed hold notification was provided regardless of payment source, and included the reserve bed payment policy, and information related to the resident's ability to return to the facility. <Resident 57> Review of Resident 57's January 2023, February 2023 and April 2023 progress notes showed Resident 57 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE], 01/26/2023, 02/24/2023, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-28 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food served to residents was palatable, attractive and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 8 of 34 sampled residents (Resident 23, 39, 37, 20, 54, 40, 65, & 35) and 22 residents who attended the food committee. The failure to obtain and act on feedback from residents regarding food and failure to ensure food temperatures were maintained during transport from the kitchen to the resident placed residents at risk for decreased intake, weight loss, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . The 07/2018 facility policy Food and Nutrition Services Food and Drink showed the facility will prepare food and drink in methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance. Food and drink will be palatable, attractive and at a safe, appetizing temperature. On 04/25/2023 at 9:00 AM, Resident 23 stated the eggs were always lukewarm and burnt on the bottom. Resident 23 stated they had previously talked with a manager about the cold burnt eggs, and the manager wrote down the complaint and said they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-28 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for all new and exiting staff as identified in the Facility Assessment. The failure to ensure new staff received orientation and were evaluated for skill sets within their scope of practice, evaluate staff skills annually, and provide annual training on abuse/neglect, mandated reporting, resident rights, communication, person-centered care, dementia care, and behavioral health, for 9 of 10 (Staff J, K, L, M, N, BB, G, Z, and I) staff placed residents at risk for unmet needs, inadequate quality of care and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the undated Facility Assessment (FA) showed the facility evaluated the resident care needs and identified staff training requirements to provide person-centered care and services the facility residents required. The FA showed staff would receive orientation upon hire and receive annual education on the topics of abuse/neglect, resident rights, dementia, mental health and behaviors, hospice care, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-28 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notices (SNF-ABN) and/or a Notice to Medicare Provider Non-Coverage (NOMNC) for 2 of 3 residents (Resident 102 & 262) reviewed for SNF ABN and NOMNC notification. The failure to provide residents information regarding changes in their Medicare services, including potential financial liability and appeal rights, deterred residents from exercising their right to decide on continuation of skilled services and costs associated, as required by the Medicare Program. Findings included . The 09/20/2022 Resident Rights of Medicaid/Medicare Coverage Liability facility policy showed the facility will issue a NOMNC to the resident or representative at least two days before the end of a Medicare covered Part A stay or when all therapy services were ending. The policy showed a SNF-ABN will be issued to inform the resident or representative of potential liability for non-covered services if the resident decided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: ensure 1 (Resident 82) of 1 residents reviewed for positioning was positioned correctly in their wheelchair; ensure care was coordinated with hospice services for 1 (Resident 78) of 1 residents reviewed for hospice services. Facility failure to ensure correct positioning left Resident 82 at risk for discomfort, and negative health outcomes. The facility's failure to coordinate care with hospice left Resident 78 at risk for receiving unnecessary care. Findings included . <Resident 82> In an interview on 04/28/2023 at 11:22 AM, Staff A (Administrator) stated there was no facility policy addressing wheelchair positioning. Staff A stated the facility used the [NAME] (Nursing) Manual which contained a section titled Measure it: Proper Wheelchair Fit is Key to Ensuring Function while Protecting Skin Integrity dated December 2014. This section showed, Users remain seated in wheelchairs during a variety of functional activities. For these…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents with urinary catheters received appropriate treatment and services for 2 of 4 (Residents 37 & 75) residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters. The failure to obtain and follow physician orders for catheter care placed residents at risk for infection and diminished quality of life. Findings included . The 04/2021 facility policy for Urinary Catheterization, showed a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter will have a rationale for use, monitor for changes, a care plan with interventions, and physician orders for changing catheters and drainage bags. <Resident 37> The 01/24/2023 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) showed Resident 37 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of diabetes, pressure ulcers and a urinary tract infection. Resident 37 was assessed as cognitively intact, able to make daily decisions and had an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of a 01/17/2023 Physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a system of records for accurate reconciliation of narcotic drugs for 1 of 3 medication carts. The failure to accurately count and verify the inventory of controlled substances - narcotic drugs through reconciliation at shift change, placed residents at risk for potential financial loss, not receiving narcotic pain medication, and possible drug diversion. Findings included . Review of the 01/01/2023 facility policy Inventory Control of Controlled Substances showed the facility would ensure the incoming and outgoing nurses counted all controlled substances and other medications with a risk of abuse or diversion at the change of each shift or at least once daily, and document the results. In an observation and interview on 04/28/2023 at 11:35 AM, Staff S (Licensed Practical Nurse) was at the [NAME] Medication Cart when a random narcotic reconciliation was completed. The narcotic ledger book showed page 91 had two doses of oxycodone remaining on the card. There was no card of oxycodone for page 91 for Resident 3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify and monitor resident-specific behaviors for the use of Antipsychotic (AP) medication and document the rationale for the use of an as needed (PRN) AP medication. The facility failed to implement non-pharmacological interventions for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 361) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet behavior needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . The 10/04/2022 facility policy Psychoactive Medications showed prior to initiating psychotropic medications (medication affecting mental function), the facility would identify rationale for use and implement non-pharmacological interventions. The policy showed PRN psychotropic medication use was limited and only used when the medication was required. The 04/17/2023 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) showed Resident 361 had diagnoses of depression, dementia with behaviors and a nervous system disorder. Resident 361 was assessed with severe cognitive impairment for daily decision making…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AVALON HEALTH CARE — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 3.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
The other 15 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVALON CARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 08/01/2004 |
| DANGERFIELD, DAVID | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 04/05/2007 |
| KIRTON, BYRON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 08/27/2024 |
| KIRTON, HYRUM | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/29/2022 |
| KIRTON, SPENCER | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 08/27/2024 |
| WOLTIL, ROBERT | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 05/23/2012 |
| BORISEVICH, MARIA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/08/2024 |
| HASH, ALAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/15/2017 |
| SMITH, NICOLE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2023 |
| AVALON HEALTH CARE INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/14/2025 |
| AVALON HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/09/2025 |
| AHMAD, ATIQUE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/26/2025 |
| STOA, INGA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/10/2025 |
| WACHOWSKI, SAMANTHA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/29/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $843K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505510. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.