No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Avalon Care Center - Honolulu, LLC

1930 Kamehameha IV Rd, Honolulu, HI 96819 · For profit - Corporation · 108 certified beds · (808) 847-4834 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (808) 847-4834 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Mar 2023Resident-funds citation (F0568)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2023
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1736 Kino St
Pharmacy
2229 N. School St., Suite 101
Grocery
2215 N School St · (808) 841-8788 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1911 Kamehameha IV Rd · (808) 768-8962 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.3%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.0%4.9%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.7%1.0%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.7%2.4%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%1.2%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.3%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.9%1.9%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened21.4%20.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication2.0%9.1%18.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.6%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.8%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control9.1%17.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table0.8%11.9%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.6%84.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.6%19.4%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.2%10.3%12.0%typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

72.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 248 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

72.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
69.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.53U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.28hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 69.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 107 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 44% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF72.7%CMS range 66.2–77.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.4%CMS range 8.6–14.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge69.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge68.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge62.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting95.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.0%CMS range 2.8–8.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.921.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.84
RN hours/ resident / day
0.27
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.51
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.62
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.38
RN hoursweekends
40.0%
Total nursing turnover
43.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 108 beds and averages 99.1 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.62 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.84 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.51 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.80 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 2.03 to 1.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

18
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-03)
18
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-05)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

55 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 45 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement the person-centered care plan for one of three residents (Resident (R)1) sampled for accidents. R1 did not receive the six-time-a-week active range of motion (AROM) exercises as noted in the care plan. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents requiring ROM exercises to maintain their strength and mobility.Findings Include:Cross reference to F688R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of but not limited to weakness, pain, and history of falling.05/21/26 at 10:00 AM, observed R1 sitting on her rollator in the activities room not participating in the balloon toss activity. When R1 was asked why she was not participating in the activity, R1 shook her head and motioned that she could not lift her arms. 05/21/26 at 10:30 AM, record review of R1's electronic health record (EHR) noted that she was a fall risk but also had mobility issues related to her weakness. Review of the care plan, which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement the active range of motion (AROM) exercises for one of three resident (Resident (R)1) sampled for accidents. R1 did not receive the six-time-a-week AROM exercises as noted in the care plan. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents requiring ROM exercises to maintain their strength and mobility.Findings Include:R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of but not limited to weakness, pain, and history of falling.05/21/26 at 10:00 AM, observed R1 sitting on her rollator in the activities room not participating in the balloon toss activity. When R1 was asked why she was not participating in the activity, R1 shook her head and motioned that she could not lift her arms. 05/21/26 at 10:30 AM, record review of R1's electronic health record (EHR) noted that she was a fall risk but also had mobility issues related to her weakness. Review of the care plan, which was initiated on 02/20/26 detailed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate protective and preventive measures for communicable diseases and infections were implemented. This is evidenced by the facility failing to ensure staff followed transmission-based precautions (additional measures used to help stop infection transmission when a patient/resident has been found to be infected or colonized with certain infectious agents) by wearing the proper personal protective equipment (PPE), followed standard precautions (the basic level of practices used to prevent the spread of infection) by performing hand hygiene, and had PPE and PPE disposal receptacles readily available both inside and/or outside the rooms. These deficient practices have the potential to affect all residents in the facility, as well as all healthcare personnel, and visitors at the facility. Findings include: 1) On 03/31/25 at 10:28 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 48 was observed coming out of R78's room wearing only a surgical mask. R78 is in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to accommodate the needs of six of six sampled residents (Residents (R) 19, R54, R338, R36, R136 and R39) by not ensuring that call devices were placed within residents' reach and positioned so the residents could activate them. As a result of this deficient practice the residents were placed at risk of not having their emergent needs met in a timely manner and prevented them from achieving independent functioning with regards to calling for help. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents in the facility who can activate a call light. Findings include: 1) R19 is an [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of R19's electronic health record (EHR) noted diagnoses of, but not limited to, legal blindness and Parkinson's with dementia. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/15/25 noted that R19 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff were available to provide restorative services for one of three residents (Resident (R) 29) sampled for limited range of motion (ROM). As a result, R29 did not receive consistent restorative nurse aide treatment and services to maintain and/or prevent a decline in ROM. This deficient practice puts 30 residents in the RNA program at risk for a decline in ROM. Findings include: Cross reference to F688, Increase/Prevent Decrease in ROM/Mobility. The facility failed to provide consistent application of splint and ROM exercises for R29. On 04/03/25 at 08:31 AM, observed R29 eating breakfast with assistance from Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 75, in bed her left arm was folded with fisted hand on chest and no splint. Inquired with CNA75 if R29 has a splint for her hand and knee, CNA75 reported R29 should be wearing her splint daily but the facility did not have an RNA today. CNA75 proceeded to explain that she could put the splint on. Inquired with R29 in her native language, Korean, if the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure personal information was protected for one of one randomly sampled resident (Resident (R) 88). The Electronic Health Record (EHR) was left open. As a result of this deficient practice, residents are at risk of their health information not remaining private. Findings include: On 04/02/25 at 07:40 AM, observed station one's medication cart in the hallway. The EHR on the cart was left open and R88's list of medications was visible and was not protected. On 04/02/25 at 07:45 AM, interviewed Registered Nurse (RN) 81 on what their policy is for the EHR, RN81 replied, I'm sorry, I forgot to close it. It should be locked every time we walk away.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for one of 21 residents sampled (Resident (R) 77) for accuracy of assessment. R77's admission comprehensive assessment did not include oxygen (O2) therapy as a respiratory treatment R77 was receiving at the facility. As a result, R77's O2 therapy was not care planned, O2 physician orders were not reviewed, and her O2 tubing was overlooked. Findings include: Cross reference to F695, Respiratory Care. The facility failed to ensure R77's respiratory care was consistent with professional standards. R77's O2 tubing was not labeled with the date it was last replaced and the physician orders did not include parameters and delivery method. Cross reference to F656, Development of the Care Plan. The facility failed to ensure R77's comprehensive care plan included O2 therapy. Review of R77's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/04/25 under Section O. Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs, O2 was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to furnish a copy of the baseline care plan (BCP) for one of two residents (Resident (R) 385) sampled for care plan meetings. The facility not providing the BCP to the residents does not keep them informed of the initial plan for delivery of care and services residents are to receive. Findings include: On 04/01/25 at 12:10 PM, interview with R385 completed. R385 stated doing ok and has plans to go home on Monday. R385 has been at facility for about a week with right leg injury and has been getting physical therapy and occupational therapy and stated it has been manageable. When asked if the facility discussed with him his plan of care, he responded no. He also stated he did not receive a copy of his care plan. On 04/01/25 at 01:00 PM, record review of R385's electronic health record (EHR) did not show that he was given a copy of his baseline care plan (BCP). On 04/02/25 at 10:00 AM, interview with Director of Nursing (DON) completed. DON stated that the care plan discussion was done at the welcome meeting with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record reviews and interviews the facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan for one of two residents (Resident (R) 77) sampled for respiratory, one of two residents (R390) sampled for dialysis, and one of one resident (R387) sampled for catheter care. As a result of this deficient practice, staff did not have the information necessary to adequately care for R77's oxygen (O2) therapy, R390's dialysis needs and post-treatment, and R387's catheter care. Findings include: 1) Cross tag to F695, Respiratory Care. The facility failed to ensure R77's respiratory care was provided consistent with professional standards. R77's O2 tubing was not labeled with the date it was last replaced and the physician orders did not include parameters and delivery method. On 04/02/25 at 02:06 PM, an interview and concurrent record review with MDS Director (MDSD) 67 was done. MDSD67 confirmed R77's comprehensive care plan did not include O2 therapy. MDSD67 reported if a resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to update Resident (R) 136's care plan to include a new intervention to treat resident's moisture-associated skin damage (MASD) with an antifungal once identified, for one of four residents sampled for skin conditions (non-pressure). The deficient practice put R136 at risk for worsening of fungal infection with MASD to her sacrum and buttocks which could lead to a pressure injury and pain. Findings include: Cross reference to F684, Quality of Care - Despite identifying R136 had a fungal infection and MASD to her sacrum and buttocks, that had worsened since admission, the facility failed to acquire a physician order for antifungal to treat the area and update R136's care plan.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 45 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to care plan and implement residents' individual activity preferences and accommodate special needs for two of two residents (Resident (R) 19 and R338) sampled for activities. This deficient practice has the potential of not supporting the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of residents and not creating a meaningful life for residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1) R338 is an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/17/25 noted that R338 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated that R338 had intact cognitive function. On 04/01/25 at 09:45 AM, R338 stated that no one comes to her room to offer activities and feels bored. She also stated that she cries when she is bored and proceeded to cry. A facility notice posted in the main elevator stated, Group Activities and Dining has been cancelled due…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide resident centered needed care and services for two of six residents (Resident (R) 77 and R136), R77 who was one of one sampled for constipation/diarrhea and R136 who was one of four residents sampled for skin conditions (non-pressure). The facility did not follow the physician ordered bowel regimen for R77. This deficient practice put R77 at potential risk for discomfort and fecal impaction. The facility failed to treat R136's Moisture-associated skin damage (MASD) with fungal infection to her sacrum and to her bilateral buttocks from 03/29/25 until 04/03/25 which the facility identified as worsening. This put R136 at risk for harm from possibly developing a pressure injury and pain. Findings include: 1) R77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of, not limited to, constipation. Review of R77's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/04/25, assessed R77's Brief Interview of Mental Status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident (R) 29) sampled for limited range of motion (ROM) received the appropriate treatment, equipment, and services to maintain and/or prevent a decline in ROM, as evidenced by inconsistent application of splint and ROM exercises. This puts R29 at risk of a decline in ROM and further contractures. Findings include: Cross reference to F725, Sufficient Nursing Staff. The facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff were available to ensure restorative nursing assistance was provided. R29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side (weakness or paralysis on left side of the body) and neuralgia and neuritis (nerve inflammation or damage). R29's room was under Transmission Based Precautions (TBP), Droplet Precautions, due to her roommate with positive COVID-19 from 05/25/25 to 04/05/25.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide an environment free of accident hazard for one of two sampled resident (Resident (R) 25) observed for accidents. R25 was observed pushed in her wheelchair with her leg rests not in place putting the resident at risk for an accident that could result in harm. Findings include: On 03/31/25 at 10:43 AM, R25 was observed pushed in her wheelchair by Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) 5 and Occupational Therapy Assistant (OTA) 7 from the end of the hall to the hallway where her room is located. R25 was seen pushed without her leg rests on her wheelchair and observed holding her feet up. Surveyor stopped staff and asked PTA5 and OTA7 where resident's leg rests were for her wheelchair. PTA5 stated they were crunched for time and leg rests are in her room. PTA5 and OTA7 proceeded to R25's room. On 03/31/25 at 10:46 AM, interviewed Physical Therapist (PT) 1 who was in the hallway outside of R25's room. Inquired of PT1 what rehab staff are to do with the foot rests for residents who are receiving PT services. PT1 explained there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided consistent with professional standards for two of two (Resident (R) 77 and R10) sampled for respiratory. R77's comprehensive assessment did not include oxygen (O2) therapy, it was not included in her care plan, her nebulizer and O2 tubing was not labeled with the date it was last replaced and the physician O2 orders did not include parameters and delivery method. R10's O2 tubing was not labeled with the date it was last replaced. This deficient practice put R77 and R10 at risk for respiratory complications. Findings include: 1) Cross reference to F641, Accuracy of Assessments. The facility failed to ensure R77's comprehensive assessment reflected she had O2 therapy. Cross reference to F656, Development of the Care Plan. The facility failed to ensure R77's comprehensive care plan included O2 therapy. R77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of, not limited to, cough, allergic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that one of two residents (Resident (R) 390) sampled for dialysis, was provided with professional standards of practice. The facility failed to remove R390's pressure dressing after two hours from the completion of R390's Hemodialysis (HD) treatment. This deficient practice puts residents on dialysis at risk for access clotting and complications. Findings include: Cross reference to F656, Development of Comprehensive Care Plans. On 04/02/25 at 09:00 AM, observed R390 with right upper arm fistula pressure dressing still on from yesterday's HD treatment. R390 stated that staff will take it off when they have time and do not really check for the thrill and bruit (a thrill is a palpable sensation felt over the fistula and bruit is a swooshing sound heard with a stethoscope which indicates good blood flow and fistula function). R390 stated he will usually be the one that takes it off. R390 stated he came back from dialysis yesterday at 04:30 PM. On 04/02/25 at 9:30 AM, record review of R390's care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement a thorough process in narcotic log documentation and reconciliation for two of four medication carts observed. This deficient practice hinders the process necessary to promptly identify loss or potential diversion of the controlled medications used to meet the needs of the residents. In addition, the facility failed to implement a process that assures the accurate and timely disposition of discontinued and/or expired medications. This deficient practice hinders the promotion of safe administration practices that decrease the risk for medication errors. These deficient practices have the potential to affect all residents in the facility who take medications. Findings include: 1) On 04/02/25 at 09:33 AM, an inspection of medication cart 1C was done with Registered Nurse (RN) 56. Observed a blister pack card of Oxycodone (a narcotic) IR 5 milligrams (mg) with 22 pills remaining for Resident (R) 236. Review of the Controlled Drug…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to document the rationale for not making any changes to the pharmacist's recommendations during a monthly medication regimen review (MRR) for one of five residents (Resident (R) 285) sampled for unnecessary medications. This puts R285 at risk for complications due to medications administered. Findings include: Review of R285's Interim Medication Regimen Review dated 03/13/25, the pharmacist documented the following action required and high-risk medication monitoring recommendations; Aspirin EC .Do not crush, On Antiplatelet: Aspirin, Clopidogrel .Monitor for s/s [signs and symptoms] of bleeding bruising; monitor for thromboembolism. On Diabetic agent: Degludec, R Insulin .Monitor for s/s of hypoglycemia; monitor for s/s hyperglycemia and On Opioid agent: Oxycodone .Monitor for constipation; monitor for s/s delirium/ over sedation/ change in mental status and reduced respirations. The facility documented they accepted the recommendation for do not crush aspirin and signed the MRR on 03/13/25. Review of R285's physician orders,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%, as evidenced by two medication errors observed out of 28 opportunities for errors, for an error rate of 7%. Safe and timely medication administration practices are essential for the health and well-being of the residents. As a result of this deficient practice, Resident (R) 56 was placed at risk of negative outcomes due to medication errors. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents in the facility taking medications administered by staff. Findings include: On 04/01/25 at 08:30 AM, began observing Registered Nurse (RN)14 as he prepared and administered medications to a resident in room [ROOM NUMBER]. RN14 was observed completing medication preparation, entering room [ROOM NUMBER], and returning to the medication cart without entering any other rooms. RN14 was also not observed with a blood pressure monitor. On 04/01/25 at 08:40 AM began observation of RN14 preparing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure all medications used in the facility were stored in accordance with professional standards for one of four medication carts observed. Proper storage of medications is necessary to promote safe administration practices and decrease the risk for medication errors. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents in the facility who take medications. Findings Include: On 04/01/25 at 08:22 AM, observed an unlocked medication cart left outside of a resident's room with no staff in sight. At this time the Infection Prevention Registered Nurse (RN) 94 was seen near by and inquired of RN94 if the medication cart is to be locked by the nurse before leaving it and she confirmed it is supposed to be locked. At 08:23 AM, RN85 returned to the medication cart. Inquired of RN85 if she was educated to lock her medication cart before she passes medication and she confirmed she had and acknowledged the medication cart was supposed to be locked before leaving it.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate protective and preventive measures for communicable diseases and infections. This is evidenced by the facility failing to ensure staff followed transmission-based precautions (TBP) by wearing the proper personal protective equipment (PPE), as well as follow standard precautions by performing hand hygiene in between glove changes. These deficient practices have the potential to affect all residents in the facility, as well as all healthcare personnel, and visitors at the facility. Findings include: 1) On 04/02/24 at 08:20 AM, an interview was done with the Infection Preventionist (IP) in her office. IP reported that Resident (R) 18 had shingles and was currently on Droplet and Contact Precautions. IP confirmed that the expectation was that staff entering R18's room would don an N-95 respirator, a face shield, a gown, and gloves. On 04/02/24 at 12:17 PM, observed two Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs), CNA42 and CNA84, assisting R18 back into bed from her wheelchair. Noted that CNA42 did not have a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to assure three of six residents sampled (Resident (R) 147, R67 and R48) who had surrogate forms filled out also included the physician's documentation stating R147, R67 and R48 did not have capacity to make their own healthcare decisions, as according to State Law. The deficient practice could affect other residents in the facility who do not have advanced healthcare directives and who have surrogate forms filled out incompletely. Findings include: 1) On 04/03/24, record review of R147's electronic health record (EHR) found no copy of her advanced healthcare directive. On 04/03/24 at 02:51 PM, interviewed Social Services Assistant (SSA) 6. Inquired if R147 had an advanced healthcare directive (AHCD). SSA6 stated R147's son stated he is R147's Power of Attorney (POA) but has not submitted the AHCD. SSA6 stated they have asked R147's son a couple of times for a copy of the AHCD and he has not provided a copy. SSA6 stated they had son fill out the form to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-05 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to provide, four of four sampled residents (Resident (R) 40, R48, R58, and R246) or their representatives, written notification of transfer/discharge as soon as practical or at least 30 days before residents are transferred or discharged Findings include: 1) On 04/02/24, Record Review (RR) of R246's Electronic Health Record (EHR) found he is a [AGE] year old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include, but are not limited to, history of falling, presence of right artificial knee joint, other chronic pain, low back pain unspecified, difficulty in walking, not elsewhere classified, muscle weakness, unspecified diastolic (congestive) heart failure and need for assistance with personal care. During the RR found facility notified resident on 07/06/23 of upcoming discharge to home planned for 07/25/23 and resident had refused to sign the form. On 04/04/24 at 1:28 PM, requested copy of notification that was sent to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-05 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure written notification of the facility's bed hold policy was provided to three residents of four sampled (Residents (R) 40, R48, R58) and their representative. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents at the facility who are discharged to an acute care hospital. Findings Include: 1) R40 was transferred and admitted to the hospital on [DATE] for sepsis (blood infection). A review of the R40's Electronic Health Record (EHR) was conducted. The EHR did not contain documentation, that a written notification regarding the facility's bed hold policy was provided to R40's representative. Interview was conducted with the Administrator on 04/04/24 at 02:00 PM. During the interview, the Administrator failed to provide documentation that the facility's bed hold policy was provided to R40's representative. A review of the facility policy titled, Admission, Transfer and discharge: Notice of Bed Hold Policy Before/Upon Transfer, with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent and manage pain adequately for 3 of 3 residents sampled for pain (Residents (R) 197, R146, and R13). Specifically, the facility failed to effectively evaluate pain on admission so that an effective, resident-centered care plan could be developed. As a result of this deficient practice, these residents were prevented from attaining or maintaining their highest practicable level of well-being. Findings include: 1) Resident (R) 197 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility for short-term rehabilitation on 04/01/24 following a loss of consciousness, and a fall at home. R197's current diagnoses include, but are not limited to, diabetes, chronic kidney disease with heart failure, leukemia, chronic pain, low back pain, and pain in both hips. As a result of her pain, R197 has current physician orders for routine acetaminophen 1000 milligrams (mg) every 8 hours, and as needed oxycodone (a powerful opioid) 5mg-7.5mg every 6 hours…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to promote care for residents in a manner that maintains and enhances each residents' dignity for three of 22 sampled residents (Resident (R) 32, R47, and R40). Staff members referred to R47 and R32 as feeders; and a staff member stood over R40 and used her personal phone while providing assistance during meals. Findings include: 1) On 04/02/24 at 12:05 PM, during lunch observation at the Waikiki Dining Room, observed six residents in the dining room and five family members. At 12:07 PM, Director of Nursing (DON) was standing next to the tray cart and directed a staff member to serve one of the food trays last because it was for a feeder. R47 was observed to be sitting right next to the tray cart when DON made the statement. R47 was observed to need assistance with her meals and was served her tray last. 2) On 04/02/24 at 01:51 PM, interview with Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) 42 was done. Observed R32 choking while eating, inquired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0568 — isolated
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and facility document review, the facility failed to provide quarterly statements and provide statements upon request to one of one residents sampled (Resident (R) 45). Findings Include: R45 is a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Interview was conducted with R45 on 04/02/24 at 11:05 AM. R45 stated that her personal funds are managed by the facility. When asked how often the facility provides account statements, R45 stated that she had never received a statement since she had been admitted . Additionally, R45 stated that she had requested a statement a while ago and had not received one thus far. R45 did not know the balance on her account. Interview and attempted record review was conducted with facility Business Office Manager (BOM) on 04/03/24 at 03:34 PM. BOM stated that she does not keep a recorded log or a tracking system to ensure that the residents are provided their account statements quarterly. BOM's current process is printing out the statements and placing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to assure the vent and ceiling outside of residents rooms were kept clean. This deficient practice could affect all residents in the facility if their environment is not kept sanitary, putting them at risk for exposure to increased risk of infection. Findings Include: On 4/02/24 at 12:34 PM, while standing in the hallway outside of a resident's room looked up and saw the ceiling and vent had black residue of an unknown source. The black residue was on the edge of the vent that meets the ceiling and spread across the ceiling spreading to both walls outside of the resident's rooms. On 04/03/24 at 11:38 AM, approached facility staff, Heavy Cleaner (HC) 1, in the hallway under the vent with black residue and inquired why the vent had black residue. HC1 stated It's from the AC, I think it's mold. HC1 stated he tried to vacuum it but vacuuming did not clean off the blackened areas. Requested to speak with his supervisor. HC1 left at 11:52 AM and returned at 11:55 AM with cleaning solution in a spray bottle and said I will try…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the Discharge Assessment for Resident (R) 94 accurately reflected the resident's discharge status. Findings include: Record review done on 04/04/24 at 01:42 PM noted Resident (R) 94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to home on [DATE]. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) Discharge Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/06/24 noted R94 was incorrectly documented as discharged to Short-Term General Hospital (acute hospitals, IPPS [inpatient prospective payment system]). On 04/04/24 at 02:07 PM, an interview was done with MDS Director (MDSD) 13 in his office. MDSD13 confirmed that R94's Discharge Assessment had been incorrectly documented and transmitted. MDSD13 stated that R94 had been discharged home with home health services.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered Comprehensive Care Plan (CP) for one of 22 residents (Resident (R) 25) sampled. As a result of this deficient practice, staff did not have the information necessary to adequately care for R25 contractures, ensuring the resident meets his highest potential of physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: Cross Reference to F688, Increase/Precent Decrease in ROM/Mobility. The facility failed to provide the proper care and treatment for the contracture in R25's left hand as ordered. Review of R25's nursing restorative monthly review dated 05/31/23 documented Resident completed OT [Occupational Therapy] services with recommendation .Left hand wound require rolled up towel under fingers. Will update care plan. Review of R25's CP found rolled gauze or towel to left hand every shift as ordered was not in the CP. On 04/05/24 at 09:33 AM interview with Director of Nursing (DON) was done. Concurrent review of R25's CP found treatment to left hand to prevent contractures…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's person-centered comprehensive Care Plan (CP) was reviewed and revised for one resident (Resident (R) 48) sampled. As a result of this deficient practice, R48 was at risk of a decline in his quality of life, not attaining his highest practicable well-being, and the potential for serious harm and/or death due to complications with his new diagnosis of diabetes. Findings include: R48 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominate side, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, vascular dementia, moderate, without behavioral disturbance, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. On 04/02/24 at 02:16 PM interview with Family Member (FM) 11 was done. FM11 reported R48 developed diabetes while living at the facility and did not have diabetes prior to admission.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to effectively assess, identify, and manage, constipation for 1 of 1 resident (Resident (R) 197) sampled. As a result of this deficient practice, R197 experienced no bowel movements for more than five days and abdominal pain/discomfort causing her distress. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility at risk of constipation. Findings include: R197 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility from an acute care hospital for short-term rehabilitation on 04/01/24, following a loss of consciousness, and a fall at home. R197's current diagnoses include, but are not limited to, diabetes, chronic kidney disease with heart failure, leukemia, chronic pain, low back pain, and pain in both hips. As a result of her pain, R197 had physician orders for routine acetaminophen 1000 milligrams (mg) every 8 hours, and as needed oxycodone (a powerful opioid) 5mg-7.5mg every 6 hours for moderate to severe pain. One of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decrease in range of motion for one of two residents (Resident (R) 25) sampled. R25 was not provided proper care and treatment for contracture to his left hand as ordered. Findings include: R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dysphagia, anemia, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, and contracture to right and left hand. Review of R25's Electronic Health Record (EHR) found under physician's order to place rolled gauze or towel to left hand every shift, ordered on 11/18/20 and revised on 10/17/21. During observations on 04/02/24 at 09:46 AM, 12:29 PM, 12:35 PM, 12:46 PM, on 04/03/24 at 08:57 AM, 02:26 PM, on 04/04/24 at 08:13 AM, 10:19 AM, 12:39 PM, and on 04/05/24 at 08:58 AM, observed R25 in bed, both hands contracture with no rolled-up gauze or towel to left hand. On 04/04/24 at 10:34 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents to one of seven sampled residents (Resident (R) 40). This failed practice has the potential to negatively affect residents who require staff assistance with feeding. Findings Include: R40 is an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R40's medical diagnoses include but not limited to, hemiplegia (one sided paralysis), hemiparesis (one sided weakness) affecting the right side following cerebral infarction (reduced blood supply to the brain), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Concurrent observation and interview were conducted on 04/03/24 at 08:01 AM with Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) 40 in R40's room. CNA 40 was observed standing up near the head of R40's bed, looking down at her personal phone. When CNA40 looked up from her phone, State Agency (SA) asked CNA40 how R40 was doing with his breakfast. CNA40 stated that she feels it might be too dry for him,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff competency in narcotic log documentation and reconciliation. This deficient practice hinders the process necessary to promptly identify loss or potential diversion of controlled medications. Findings include: On 04/04/24 at 08:45 AM, an inspection and reconciliation of the narcotic log on medication cart 2C was done with Registered Nurse 37. Noted blister pack for Resident (R) 3's Tramadol 50 milligrams (mg) had thirty-nine (39) tablets remaining while the narcotic log reflected a balance of forty (40) tablets remaining. At this moment, RN37 took the narcotic log from Surveyor and signed out one tablet of Tramadol for R3. When asked why he was only signing the Tramadol out at that moment (wrote signed out at 08:47 AM), RN37 stated he had just given it and got back to the cart. Surveyor pointed out that he did not just get back to the cart after administering the medication to R3, because Surveyor had just observed him…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all medications used in the facility were labeled in accordance with professional standards. Proper labeling of medications is necessary to promote safe administration practices and decrease the risk for medication errors. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents in the facility taking medications. Findings include: On 04/04/24 at 08:27 AM, upon inspection of medication cart 2B with Registered Nurse (RN) 61, noted an albuterol inhaler pulled from the emergency kit (e-kit), with no name, and no date, despite it being clearly opened and used. RN61 confirmed that it had been used, as it would not have been pulled from the e-kit unless it was needed for immediate use but could not explain why it was not properly labeled. On 04/04/24 at 08:39 AM, an interview was done with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) 2 near medication cart 2B. ADON2 confirmed that the inhaler and the box that it was in should be labeled with a minimum of a resident name and the date it was opened. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's (Resident (R) 25) medical record was accurately documented. Findings include: Cross Reference to F688, Increase/Precent Decrease in ROM/Mobility. The facility failed to provide the proper care and treatment for the contracture in R25's left hand as ordered. Review of R25's Electronic Health Record (EHR) found under physician's order to place rolled gauze or towel to left hand every shift, ordered on 11/18/20 and revised on 10/17/21. During observations on 04/02/24 at 09:46 AM, 12:29 PM, 12:35 PM, 12:46 PM, on 04/03/24 at 08:57 AM, 02:26 PM, on 04/04/24 at 08:13 AM, 10:19 AM, 12:39 PM, and on 04/05/24 at 08:58 AM, observed R25 in bed, both hands contracture with no rolled-up gauze or towel to left hand. Review of R25's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) in April, during the survey period, documented, administered, Place ROLLED GAUZE or TOWEL to LEFT HAND, on all shifts, day, evening, and night from 04/02/24 to 04/04/24. On 04/04/24 at 12:39 PM an interview with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain resident (R)148's bed cord control, that raises and lowers the bed, in safe operating condition. The bed cord was frayed in multiple places putting the resident and staff at risk for electrocution. The deficient practice could affect all residents with a bed control. Findings Include: On 04/02/24 at 12:32 PM, observed R148's bed control was placed in her dresser drawer at the bedside. Noticed the cord for the bed control was frayed in multiple places. R148 stated she was tired and was going to sleep because she had a rough night so was not able to answer any questions about the bed control. On 04/05/24 at 09:58 AM, met with Unit Manager Registered Nurse (UMRN) 87 who confirmed the bed control cord was frayed, not safe and she would have maintenance fix this.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-17 · tag F0623 — widespread
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify in writing the transfer and discharge to hospital as indicated in regulation for two of two residents (Resident (R)14 and R20) sampled. Findings include: 1. On 03/16/23 at 02:20 PM, conducted Record Review (RR) of Resident (R)14's Electronic Health Record (EHR). A Social Services note dated 03/07/23. Social Services Manager (SSM) documented resident emergency contact was informed via telephone of R14's discharged because the resident was transferred to an acute hospital. There was no documentation that a written notice was provided to R14's emergency contact. 2. On 03/17/23 at 09:26 AM, conducted a concurrent RR and interview with facility administrator. She confirmed that the facility notifies residents, family, or representatives telephonically rather than providing written notifications of discharge. 2) Review of the EHR documented R20 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] for sepsis and elevated troponin level. Further review did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-17 · tag F0625 — widespread
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review (RR), the facility failed to provide written notice of bed-hold policy as indicated in regulation for 2 of 2 Residents (R)14 and R20 sampled. Findings include: (Cross-Reference to F623 - Notice Requirements Before Transfer/ Discharge) 1) On 03/16/23 at 02:20 PM, conducted a RR of R14's Electronic Health Record (EHR). A Social Services note documented resident representative was verbally informed via telephone of the facility's bed-hold policy when resident was transported to an acute hospital. There was no documentation that a written notice was provided to the resident and/or resident's representative. On 03/17/23 at 09:26 AM, conducted a concurrent RR and interview with Administrator. The Administrator confirmed that residents and/or their representatives are notified via telephone regarding the facility's bed-hold policy, but currently the facility does not have a process for providing written notification of bed-hold policy the resident and/or their representatives. 2)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. As a result of this deficient practice, residents are at risk of exposure and contracting communicable disease(s) that has the potential to result in harm. Findings include: 1) On 03/14/23 at 12:23 PM, observations were done of Certified Nurse Aide (CNA)26 as she passed lunch trays in Station 1. Observed CNA26 deliver three (3) trays to room [ROOM NUMBER] (which had all residents in the room marked as on TBP) with no hand hygiene or gloves worn/changed in between trays/residents. Then observed CNA26 deliver one (1) tray to room [ROOM NUMBER], and three (3) trays to room [ROOM NUMBER]. No hand hygiene or gloves were observed between trays/residents as CNA26 returned to the tray cart to grab and deliver each tray one by one. On 03/14/23 at 12:28 PM, an interview was done with CNA26 after delivering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity for seven (Resident (R) R38, R37, R67, R5, R76, R82, and R51) residents sampled. Staff member stood over R37, R38, and R51 while providing assistance during meals; staff members were speaking another language while providing care to R5 and outside of residents' rooms; after R76 followed up for a requested item with nursing staff, a nursing staff member stuck her tongue at R76 and a nursing staff offered R76 drinking water from a communal bathroom sink; and while a nursing staff member was providing assistance to R82, the nursing staff member did not communicate to her in a way that promoted a dignified existence. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy and procedure number 557 RESIDENT RIGHTS Respect and Dignity documents The resident has a right to be treated with respect and dignity. 1) On 03/14/23 at 12:46 PM, conducted an observation of R38 in the resident's room during lunch.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-17 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interview the facility failed to update the nurse staffing data daily. Findings include: On 03/16/23 at 08:59 AM observed the facility's nurse staff data posting dated 03/15/23, the day before. On 03/16/23 at 09:06 AM concurrent observation and interview with Wound Care Nurse (WCN), WCN confirmed the nurse staff data posted was dated the posting from yesterday, 03/15/23 and was not updated. On 03/17/23 at 09:01 AM observed the facility's nurse staff data posting dated 03/16/23, the day before. On 03/17/23 at 09:06 AM interview with Director of Nursing was done. DON stated the nurse staff data should be posted every morning by the scheduler, and if the scheduler is late then night shift or managers should be instructed to update the posting. DON stated, there should be a new schedule up right now.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all medications used in the facility were securely stored in locked compartments, and failed to ensure all medications used in the facility were labeled in accordance with professional standards. Proper security and labeling of medications is necessary to promote safe administration practices, decrease the risk for medication errors, and decrease the risk for the diversion of resident medications. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents in the facility who take medications. Findings include: 1) On 03/16/23 at 07:23 AM, observed Nursing Staff (NS)2 walk away from medication cart (med cart) 1A, leaving it unlocked. State Agency (SA) reminded her to lock it before walking to the other end of the hall to med cart 1B. At 07:23 AM, observed NS2 walk away from med cart 1B, leaving it unlocked outside room [ROOM NUMBER]. SA again reminded her to secure her med cart before walking away. NS2 acknowledged that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-17 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review (RR), the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition. This deficient practice has the potential to result in harm to residents on supplemental oxygen therapy. Findings include: (Cross-Reference to F842 Resident Records) On 03/14/23 at 02:51 PM, observed Resident (R)16's oxygen (O2) concentrator. Oxygen tubing and concentrator bottle were clean and labled 03/11/23 but outside cover of concentrator was visibly soiled with brown, sticky stain and gray dust on external filter casing. On subsequent observation on 03/15/23, oxygen concentrator was still not cleaned. On 03/16/23 at 10:54 AM, conducted concurrent observation and interview with maintenance director (MAD). MAD stated that an outside contractor is responsible for repair and maintenance of all O2 concentrators and stated that he would provide maintenance record for R16's O2 concentrator. On inspection with MAD, external cover had brown, sticky stain, filter casing and external filter were covered with gray,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review (RR), the facility failed to ensure the right to formulate an Advance Directive and/or ensure follow-up discussions regarding Advance Directives for four of six residents (Resident (R)50, R56, R5, and R76) sampled. As a result of this deficient practice, these residents were placed at risk of not having their wishes honored for future health care decisions, should they become incapacitated. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility. Findings include: 1) On 03/14/23 at 11:49 AM, a review of Resident (R)50's electronic health record (EHR) noted no advance health care directive (AD) found, and no documentation that it had been discussed. What was documented was a Durable Power-of-Attorney (DPOA) for finances, but none for health care. A review of the SS [Social Services] Quarterly & Annual Evaluation, completed on 02/11/22 noted the following: Advanced Directives? . Yes . Description: Names a DPOA. AD documentation requested from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to assure a resident has the right to a sanitary and comfortable homelike environment for two of five residents (Resident (R) 76 and R67) sampled. R76 was not comfortable leaving a communal bathroom to go back to her bed due to staff putting unsanitary items on the walkway floor and the sound level in the room while R67 is resting. Findings include: 1) Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) defined homelike environment and sanitary in the State Operating Manual (SOM) Appendix PP, A homelike environment is one that de-emphasizes the institutional character of the setting, to the extent possible .A determination of homelike should include the resident's opinion of the living environment . and Sanitary includes, but is not limited to, preventing the spread of disease-causing organisms by keeping resident care equipment clean and properly stored. Resident care equipment includes, but is not limited to, equipment used in the completion of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents are free from abuse or deprived of services by staff, for three of four residents (Resident (R) 82, R11 and R76) sampled. The facility failed to respond to R82's call light timely; a nursing staff member turned off R11's call light multiple times without providing assistance; and a nursing staff member did not help R76 when she requested assistance. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy and procedure FREEDOM FROM ABUSE, NEGLECT and EXPLOITATION defines abuse as The willful .deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of foods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial; well-being . Willful is defined as The individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. The policy further documents the types of abuse including deprivation of goods and services, Staff with the knowledge and ability to provide foods or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered Comprehensive Care Plan (CP) for three of five residents ((R)50, R8, and R77) sampled. As a result of this deficient practice, these residents were at risk of a decline in their quality of life, not attaining their highest practicable well-being, and the potential for serious harm and/or death due to adverse effects of an anticoagulant medication. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility. Findings include: 1) Cross-reference to F676 Activities of Daily Living (ADLs)/Maintain Abilities. The facility failed to provide the proper care and treatment to maintain the ADLs for Resident (R)50, including a care plan for scabies and social isolation due to having scabies. As a result, R50 experienced a decline in her ADL function. 2) Cross-reference to F676 Activities of Daily Living (ADLs)/Maintain Abilities. The facility failed to provide the proper care and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's person-centered comprehensive Care Plan (CP) was reviewed and revised for one Resident ((R)50) sampled. As a result of this deficient practice, staff did not have the information necessary to adequately care for R50 ensuring the resident meets the highest potential of physical and psychosocial well-being. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility. Findings include: Cross-reference to F676 Activities of Daily Living (ADLs)/Maintain Abilities. The facility failed to provide the proper care and treatment to maintain the ADLs for Resident (R)50, including revising her activities and ADL care plans after identifying, isolating, and treating her for scabies. As a result, R50 experienced a decline in her ADL function. In addition, despite a functional decline being recently identified and referred to a Physical Therapist (PT), no revisions in R50's ADL CP had been done as a result.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-17 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide the proper care and treatment to maintain the activities of daily living (ADLs) for Resident (R)50. In addition, the facility failed to provide the proper care and treatment, including assistive devices, to improve the communication abilities of R8. As a result, R50 experienced a decline in her ADL function and R8 was placed at an increased risk of not having her needs met. Both residents were placed at risk of experiencing a decline in their physical well-being, psychosocial well-being, and quality of life. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents at the facility placed on isolation in their rooms and/or with communication needs. Findings include: 1) Resident (R)50 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] following a stroke. On 03/14/23 at 12:08 PM, an observation was done of a Physical Therapist (PT) in R50's room conducting an evaluation of her. During an interview with R50 on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free of accident hazards for one of two residents sampled (Resident (R) 27). As a result of this deficient practice, the resident is at risk for potential harm. Findings include: R27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R27's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/12/23 documents R27's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score at a 15, indicating the resident is cognitively intact. On 03/16/23 at 08:27 AM an interview with R27 was done. R27 stated he had a recent fall in the shower. R27 reported he sat on a previously known uneven and shaky shower chair when the shower chair broke, and he fell in the shower. R27 stated Certified Nurse Aide (CNA)31 witnessed the fall and was assisting him with showering. Review of R27's nursing note documents on 03/11/23, Today is resident's shower schedule. Co-RNs [Registered Nurses] heard a loud noise. The shower room was checked and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-17 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff demonstrated competency skills for one resident (Resident (R)76). Staff did not competently apply a pain medication patch as ordered by the physician. As a result of this deficient practice, R76 is at risk of the potential for harm related to unrelieved pain. Findings include: R76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for short-term rehabilitation. Review of R76's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/19/23 documents R76's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score at a 15, cognitively intact. On 03/14/23 at 10:25 AM during an interview with R76 and her roommate in their room, R76 was called by nursing staff members to come outside of the room, R76 was observed to have two long vertical incisions down both her knees with no bandage wrapped around them during the interview. R76 was then observed to be in front of the room door facing the hallway receiving care by nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was palatable, attractive, and at an appetizing temperature for two residents (Resident (R)51 and R54). As a result of this deficient practice, residents are at risk for the potential of negative psychosocial and/or a decline in weight. Findings include: On 03/14/23 at 12:34 PM, conducted an observation of R51's and R54's lunch and concurrent interviews with both residents. R51 looked at her food and inquired with this surveyor if her lunched looked good enough to eat? This surveyor inquired with the resident if she thought it looked good to eat? R51 stated that the food does not look good and it makes her not want to eat it. R51 reported that her food often comes cold because they (R51 and R54) are one of the last rooms to receive their food. R51 stated that the food often does not look appetizing. R54 confirmed with R51 in that the food often does not look appetizing and the hot food is not always hot. R54 stated that she likes to have butter in her oatmeal, however, she when she received the oatmeal it was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and record review (RR), the facility failed to accurately document medical equipment maintenance and cleaning records for one resident (Resident (R)16) sampled. As a result of this deficent practice, the resident is at risk for the potential for exposure to dust and allergens that could adversely affect the resident. Findings include: (Cross-Reference to F908 Maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition) On 03/16/23 at 10:54 AM, conducted concurrent observation and interview with maintenance director (MAD). Observed cover and filter of Resident (R)16's oxygen (O2) concentrator (Serial#08BF020637) visibly soiled. Conducted a RR on 03/16/23 at 15:33 PM of R16's treatment record showed nursing staff documented cleaning oxygen tubing, concentrator bottle, and filter on 03/11/23. On 03/17/23 at 11:20 PM, RR of service records documented inspection and service of other facility O2 concentrators but no documented service for the O2 concentrator assigned to R16.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVALON HEALTH CARE — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.9+0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.2+0.8 vs chain
The other 15 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
AVALON OF HAWAII LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/20/2004
AVALON CARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/26/2003
DANGERFIELD, DAVIDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/05/2007
KIRTON, BYRONIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/27/2024
KIRTON, HYRUMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/11/2026
KIRTON, SPENCERIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/27/2024
WOLTIL, ROBERTIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/23/2012
BORISEVICH, MARIAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/08/2024
HASH, ALANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/15/2017
SMITH, NICOLEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
AVALON HEALTH CARE INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2004
AVALON HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2004
BEN, BERNADETTEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/18/2016
BLANCHETTE, PATRICIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/17/2019
KAALEKAHI, KAIULANIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/20/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$22.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+13.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.1M
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 44%Medicare 15%Other / private 41%

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$537per resident / day
operating cost
$16,316per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$622per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in HI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Hawaii Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Hawaii
$15,473/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,395/mo
Nursing home (private)
$12,096/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 125020. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next