Oak Hill Health & Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 768 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 81.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 211 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.83 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 109 beds and averages 104.0 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.44 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.60 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.70 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatment and care was provided to all facility residents for physician prescribed medications for 2 of 4 residents, Resident #1 and #4, reviewed for medication administration.Findings include:Review of Resident #1's admission data revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with medical diagnoses to include a history of urinary (tract) infections and chronic kidney disease.Review of Resident #1's physician orders documented, Bactrim DS [double strength] oral tablet 800-160 mg [milligrams]. Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for UTI [urinary tract infection] for 14 days. Start date 12/17/2025 at 1700 [5:00 PM]; D/C [discontinue] date 12/19/2025 at 0645 [6:45 AM].Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented dated 12/17/2025 at 1700 Bactrim was administered as ordered by the physician. Dated 12/18/2025 at 0600 (6:00 AM) the entry was blank. Dated 12/18/2025 at 1700 and 12/19/2025 at 0600 was documented with a 9 - Other/See…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document unavailable medications and notification to physicians of missed doses of ordered medications for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #4) of 4 residents reviewed for medication administration.Findings include:Review of Resident #1's admission data revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with medical diagnoses to include a history of urinary (tract) infections and chronic kidney disease.Review of Resident #1's physician orders documented, Bactrim DS [double strength] oral tablet 800-160 mg [milligrams]. Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for UTI [urinary tract infection] for 14 days. Start date 12/17/2025 at 1700 [5:00 PM]; D/C [discontinue] date 12/19/2025 at 0645 [6:45 AM].Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented dated 12/17/2025 at 1700 Bactrim was administered as ordered by the physician. Dated 12/18/2025 at 0600 (6:00 AM) the entry was blank. Dated 12/18/2025 at 1700 and 12/19/2025 at 0600 was documented with a 9 -…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-02 · tag F0645 — pattern
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASRR) were accurately completed for 7 of 7 residents, Residents #9, #15, #23, #28, #31, #44, #59, reviewed for mood and behavior.Findings include:1) Review of Resident #44 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) dated 7/27/2024 did not document serious mental illness or intellectual disability.Review of Resident #44's admission record resident was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including but not limited to anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder and psychosis. Review of Resident #44's physician order dated 7/29/2024 read, Xanax Oral Tablet 0.25 mg [milligram] give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for anxiety.Review of resident #44's physician order dated 12/10/2024 read, Zoloft Oral Tablet 50 mg give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for depression. Review of Resident #44's psychiatry subsequent note dated 6/3/2025 read, Chief Complaint: Depression, anxiety, insomnia and Parkinson's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatment and care was provided for intravenous (IV) dressing changes for 2 of 4 residents, Residents #195 and #444, reviewed for IV catheters and infusions, and failed to ensure medication management for 1 of 6 residents, Resident #55, reviewed for medications.Findings include:1) During an observation on 06/29/25 at 10:17 AM Resident #195 had a double lumen PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) line inserted in his left upper arm. The dressing covering the insertion site was dated 6/17/2025. Review of Resident #195's physician order dated 5/23/2025 read, Change catheter site dressing every week and prn [as needed] with a transparent dressing every shift every Tue [Tuesday] for IV therapy.During an interview on 7/1/2025 at 1:11PM Staff E, Licensed Practical Nurse stated, IV dressing changes should be done every week or as needed. I don't know what happened I thought I had changed the dressing.During an interview won 7/2/2025 at 9:45 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, Central line dressing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were securely stored when unattended and failed to date and label intravenous (IV) medication infusion bags and tubing. Findings include: 1) During an observation on 6/29/2025 at 11:32 AM Resident #499 was lying in bed. Next to the bed was an intravenous (IV) pole. Hanging on the pole was a Zosyn IV infusion bag. The infusion bag and the tubing were not dated or timed. re was no date or time on the IV infusion bag or tubing. (photographic evidence obtained)2) During an observation on 6/30/2025 at 10:19 AM of Resident #27's room there was CeraVe eczema relief cream on top of the bedside table. (Photographic evidence obtained) 3) During an observation on 7/1/2025 at 8:22 AM Resident #195's IV medication was hanging from an IV pole. The infusion bag and the IV tubing was not labeled with the date and time. Observed on top of Resident #195 bedside table was a Germa Ubre Plus topical analgesic ointment (is a medicated ointment used to relieve minor aches and pains in muscle and joints). During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure foods and drinks were served at a safe and appetizing temperature.Findings include: During an interview on 6/29/25 at 10:03 AM Resident #493 stated, My food is always cold.During an interview on 6/29/25 at 10:20 AM Resident #495 stated, My food is sometimes cold. During an interview on 6/29/25 at 10:32 AM Resident #498 stated, The food is lukewarm.During an observation on 7/1/25 beginning at 7:00 AM, a test tray investigation on the 100 hallway was conducted related to resident complaints. At 7:19 AM the last tray/test tray was plated and placed on an enclosed meal delivery cart. At 7:20 AM the meal delivery cart exited the kitchen and headed towards the 100 hallway. At 7:35 AM the test tray/last tray was removed from the insulated meal delivery cart. The CDM (Certified Dietary Manager) tested the temperature of the scrambled eggs with a finding of 101 degrees Fahrenheit, the link sausages with a finding of 120 degrees Fahrenheit, and a glass of orange juice with a finding of 48 degrees Fahrenheit.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in accordance with professional standards in the kitchen walk-in cooler and walk-in freezer and in the second floor nourishment freezer. Findings include:During the initial observation of the kitchen on 6/30/25 beginning at 9:07 AM in the walk-in freezer, there was a clear plastic bag of tater tots sitting on a shelf. The bag was not labeled or dated. In the walk-in cooler, were two trays of uncovered slices of pie on a rolling cart.During an interview on 6/29/25 at 9:08 AM Staff G, Head [NAME] stated, It [plastic bag of tater tots] should be labeled and dated. The dessert [pie] should be covered. During the interview on 7/2/25 at 12:37PM the Dietary Manager states, Food should be labeled and dated and the desserts [pie] should have been covered.During observation on 6/29/25 at 9:40 AM of the nourishment refrigerator/freezer located on the second floor inside the life enrichment room, there was an ice bucket in the freezer with an ice scooper laying on the ice.During an interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurately documented medical records for 1 of 4 residents, Resident #195, reviewed for central catheters and 2 of 6 residents, Resident #5 and #13, reviewed for medication management.Findings include:1) During an observation on 06/29/25 at 10:17 AM Resident #195 was sitting in wheelchair. Resident #195 was observed to have a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line double lumen inserted in the left upper arm. The site was covered with a dressing that was dated 6/17/2025.Review of Resident #195’s physician order dated 5/23/2025 read, Change catheter site dressing every week and prn [as needed] with transparent dressing every shift every Tue [Tuesday] for IV [intravenous] therapy.Review of Resident #195’s Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for the month of June 2025, documented the PICC line dressing change was completed on 6/24/2025.During an interview on 7/1/2025 at 1:11 PM Staff E, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated, IV dressing changes should be done every week or as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the possible spread of infection when not following infection control standards to wear appropriate personal protective equipment for 3 of 5 residents, Resident #195, #444, and #499, reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions, and failed to store respiratory equipment when not in use for 1 of 2 residents, Resident #5, reviewed for respiratory services. Findings include: 1) During an observation on 7/1/2025 at 8:22 AM Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) entered Resident #195’s room. Outside on the door frame to Resident #195’s room there was an enhanced barrier sign posted. Staff C entered the room and performed hand hygiene. Staff C donned gloves but did not put on a gown. Resident #195’s IV (intravenous) pump was peeping. Staff C turned the pump off. Staff C walked outside of the room with the gloves on, returned to the medication cart, and grabbed a curos disinfecting cap [a single-use cap designed to disinfect and protect IV access points]. Staff C entered the room, removed her gloves, did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were kept secured in the facility in 2 of 4 residents rooms observed, Resident #2 and Resident #4 (Photographic evidence obtained). Findings include: During an observation on 6/28/2024 at 9:30 AM, there were Systane eyedrops on Resident #2's bedside table within resident's reach, and Equate Baby Powder and Equate Arthricream Rub on the shelf inside the resident's room. During an interview on 6/28/2024 at 9:30 AM, Resident #2 stated, I use the eyedrops at least twice a day sometimes 4 times a day. I only use the baby powder and the cream if I need it. Review of Resident #2's physician orders revealed no orders for self-administration of medications. During an observation on 6/28/2024 at 9:55 AM, there was a bottle of Systane eyedrops on the bedside table by the bed within reach in Resident #4's room. During an interview on 6/28/2024 at 9:55 AM, Resident #4 stated, I use the eye drops whenever my eyes get blurry and I used them yesterday. Review of Resident #4's physician orders revealed no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TLC MANAGEMENT — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL