Bridgewater Park Health & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 687 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 79.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 160 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.62 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 116.4 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.41 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.60 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2026-03-05 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff hired in the position of Dietary Manager had obtained the required qualifications to serve as Dietary Manager of the facility.Findings include: During an interview on 3/2/2026 beginning at 9:22 AM, Staff A, Dietary Manager, stated he was employed by the facility as the Dietary Manager. Review of personnel records for Staff A, Dietary Manager, revealed the Dietary Manager had high school education and had worked as the facility Dietary Manager since September 2025. Staff A's records did not show documentation indicating Staff A had completed a course of study in food safety and management by no later than October 1, 2023.During interview on 3/3/2026 beginning at 12:13 PM, Staff A, Dietary Manager, stated that he was not qualified as a Certified Dietary Manager. He stated that he had no other certifications or credentials related to kitchen management. He confirmed that he had obtained a high school diploma and had worked as a Dietary Manager in another state.During an interview on 3/3/2026 at 1:50 PM, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurate for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for behavioral health (Resident #131).Findings include:Review of Resident #131's admission record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include major depressive disorder (onset date of 2/20/2026).Review of Resident #131's admission MDS dated [DATE] did not show depression documented as a diagnosis under Section I. Active Diagnoses.Review of Resident #131's physician order dated 2/20/2026 read, Bupropion HCl [Hydrochloride] ER [Extended Release] Tablet Extended Release 24-hour 300 mg [milligram], Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for depression.Review of Resident #131's physician order dated 2/21/2026 read, Sertraline HCl 100 mg Tablet, Give 2 tablet by mouth one time a day for depression.Review of Resident #131's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for February 2026 for administration of Bupropion showed the medication was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to coordinate Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for the residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder for 3 of 7 residents reviewed for PASRR (Residents #7, #10, and #131).Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #7's admission record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include delusional disorders (onset date of 7/24/2025); unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance (onset date of 5/16/2025); and mild cognitive impairment of uncertain or unknown etiology (onset date of 5/16/2025). Review of Resident #7's Level I PASRR dated 5/16/2025 showed no diagnosis of mental illness or suspected mental illness documented under section I. PASRR Screen Decision-Making. Further review of the PASRR read, Section IV: PASRR Screen Completion. Individual may be admitted to a Nursing Facility (check one of the following: [checked box] No diagnosis or suspicion of Serious Mental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff dated the wound dressing for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for skin integrity (Resident #15), failed to ensure physician-ordered weights were obtained for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for medication management (Resident #15), and failed to ensure staff followed physician-ordered parameters for administering blood glucose medications for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for medication management (Resident #66).Findings include:1) During an observation on 3/2/2026 at 9:14 AM, Resident #15's left shin wound was covered with a bandage. There was no date on the dressing.Review of Resident #15's physician order dated 2/3/2026 read, Cleanse left lower shin skin tear with NS [normal saline], place one single layer xeroform, cover with dry dressing one time a day for skin tear.During an observation on 3/4/2026 at 11:12 AM, Resident #15's left shin wound was covered with a bandage. There was no date on the dressing.During an interview on 3/4/2026 at 12:15 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) confirmed that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor weights for residents who were at nutritional risk for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for weight loss (Residents #63 and #88).Findings include:1) Review of Resident #63's physician order dated 2/16/2026 read, Obtain Weight Daily x [times] 3 Days every day shift for 3 Days.Review of Resident #63's physician order dated 2/19/2026 read, Obtain weight daily x 3 days every day shift for 3 Days.Review of Resident #63's physician order dated 2/25/2026 read, Daily weights x 7 days in the morning for weight monitoring for 7 days.Review of Resident #63's Treatment Administration Record for February 2026 for obtaining weights showed no entry on 2/15/2026, code 12 (not applicable) on 2/16/2026, NA (not applicable) on 2/17/2026, and code 12 on 2/19/2026, and 2/20/2026. Review of Resident #63's Weight Summary showed weights documented as 111.4 pounds on 2/14/2026, 104.4 pounds on 2/24/2026, and 105.4 pounds on 3/3/2025. There were no other weights documented for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received oxygen as ordered by physician for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy (Resident #106).Findings include:During an observation on 3/2/2026 at 9:34 AM, Resident #106 was sitting in her wheelchair in her room. No oxygen was being administered. There was a portable oxygen concentrator in the room against the wall near the door.During an interview on 3/2/2026 at 9:34 AM, Resident #106 stated, The concentrator is not mine. It was in the room when I first arrived.During an observation on 3/2/2026 at 2:37 PM, Resident #106 was participating in therapy, with no oxygen being administered at the time of observation.During an observation on 3/3/2026 at 8:24 AM, Resident #106 was sitting up in bed. No oxygen was being administered and there was no portable oxygen concentrator in the resident's room.During an observation on 3/3/2026 at 2:13 PM, Resident #106 was in bed. There was no oxygen being administered and no oxygen concentrator in the resident's room.During an interview on 3/3/2026…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication order had limit in duration and was clinically appropriate for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #10).Findings include:Review of Resident #10's admission record showed the resident was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include generalized anxiety disorder, and mild single episode major depressive disorder.Review of Resident #10's physician order dated 2/23/2026 read, Alprazolam Oral Tablet 0.25 mg [milligram] (Alprazolam), Give 1 tablet by mouth every 24 hours as needed for anxiety. The order reflected a start date of 2/23/2026 with an indefinite end date.Review of Resident #10's Medication Administration Record for February 2026 and March 2026 for administration of Alprazolam showed the resident was administered the medication on 2/23/2026 at 1:41 PM, 2/28/2026 at 12:53 PM, and 3/3/2026 at 2:11 AM.During an interview on 3/3/2026 at 1:07…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored and labeled in accordance with accepted professional principles in 2 of 4 units.Findings include: 1) During an observation on 3/2/2026 at 10:14 AM, Resident #134 was not in his room. There was an intravenous infusion pole in the room with an infusion bag of Daptomycin connected to the intravenous tubing that was not labeled with time and date (Photographic evidence obtained). During an observation on 3/2/2026 at 10:45 AM, Staff D, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), confirmed the intravenous infusion bag nor the intravenous tubing were labeled with time and date. Review of Resident #134's physician order dated 2/26/2026 read, Daptomycin Intravenous Solution Reconstituted 500 MG [milligram] (Daptomycin), Use 1000 mg intravenously one time a day for MRSA [Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus] (wound in back) until 3/16/2026 23:59 [11:59 PM]. During an interview on 3/2/2026 at 10:45 AM, Staff D, LPN, stated, The tubing needs to be dated. I do not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received medications as ordered by physician for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident #2. Findings include: Review of Resident #2's admission record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses including muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #2's physician order dated 7/11/2024 read, Milk of Magnesia [MOM] Suspension 400 MG [milligram]/5 ML [milliliter], Give 30 ml by mouth every 12 hours as needed for constipation daily if no BM [Bowel Movement] for 2 days. Review of Resident #2's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for July 2024 showed no entries documented on 7/11/2024 through 7/18/2024 for administration of Milk of Magnesia with the start date of 7/11/2024 and discontinuation date of 7/18/2024. Review of Resident #2's physician order dated 7/11/2024 read, Bisacodyl Suppository 10 mg (Bisacodyl), Insert 1 suppository rectally every 24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of the minimum data set for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for skin conditions, Resident #106. Findings include: During an observation on 9/3/2024 at 9:05 AM, Resident #106 was lying in bed, with tubular stretch net bandage with dressing on her right lower leg. During an interview on 9/3/2024 at 9:05 AM, Resident #106 stated, I came to the facility with wounds. I have one on my bottom and on my right leg. Review of Resident #106's physician order dated 8/12/2024 read, Cleanse wound to Right lower ext [extremity] with NS [Normal Saline], apply calcium alginate, medi honey and foam dressing daily, every day shift for wound. Review of Resident #106's physician order dated 8/12/2024 read, Cleanse buttock with NSS [Normal Saline Solution] apply medi honey and cover with foam dressing every day shift for buttock wound. Review of Resident #106's Minimum Data Set (MDS) titled admission Medicare 5 day dated 8/15/2024 showed no skin condition documented under Section M- Skin Conditions. During an interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TLC MANAGEMENT — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL