Addison Pointe Health & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 342 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 71.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 140 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 92.5 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.79 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.76 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.91 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-03-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident, dependent on staff for transferring from the chair to bed, had received adequate assistance and supervision to prevent accidents related to staff not following the manufacture's manual regarding keeping the legs of the lift at their maximum opened position before lifting a resident during a mechanical lift transfer for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident 21) This deficient practice resulted in the resident falling and receiving a fracture to her left upper arm. The deficient practice was corrected on 10/16/24, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. The facility identified the concern, completed a house wide sweep of the Hoyer lifts (a mechanical lift) and Hoyer slings, an inservice was held related to transfer techniques, two person staff assist while using the Hoyer lift, and leg of the base in their widest opened position, and return demonstration by staff was observed, and audits related to the use of the Hoyer lift were completed. Finding includes:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure bruises were assessed and monitored for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for non-pressure related skin conditions, blood pressure medications were administered within parameters for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for medications with parameters, and an assessment was documented prior to and after an outpatient procedure for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. (Residents 77, 48, 42, and 11)Findings include:1. The record for Resident 77 was reviewed on 5/4/26 at 1:34 p.m. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, stroke, dementia, fracture of right talus (ankle), major depressive disorder, and osteoarthritis of right and left knees. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/7/26, indicated the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making. The resident had an impairment in range of motion to one side of his lower extremities and needed partial to moderate assist with transfers. An Outpatient Discharge Instruction sheet, dated 4/10/26, indicated the resident had a post medial branch…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored appropriately related to nystatin powder, insulin pens were not used past the expiration date, and over the counter medications were labeled correctly for 2 of 2 residents observed with medications in their rooms and for 2 of 4 medication carts observed. (Residents 42 and 9, the 100 hall and 400 hall medication carts)Findings include:1. During a random observation on [DATE] at 9:30 a.m., Resident 42 was observed in bed. At that time, there was a small plastic medication cup filled to the top of white powder on her dresser. During an interview at that time, the resident indicated the nurse had brought some Nystatin powder for her rash under her breasts and left it there so she could apply it herself. The record for Resident 42 was reviewed on [DATE] at 1:21 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, type 2 diabetes, heart failure, high blood pressure, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a resident's dignity related to checking a resident's blood sugar and announcing the result in a common area for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dignity. (Resident 97)Finding includes:During an observation on 5/1/26 at 11:21 a.m., RN 1 was preparing to check Resident 97's blood sugar. The resident was sitting in her wheelchair in the day room along with two other residents and a visitor. RN 1 approached the resident, and told her she was going to check her blood sugar. She stuck the resident's finger, checked her blood sugar, and announced the result loudly. RN 1 did not ask the resident permission to check her blood sugar in the common area with others present. During an interview on 5/1/26 at 11:43 a.m., Unit Manager 1 indicated the resident was alert and oriented, and new to the facility. They were working on a care plan that indicated the resident was ok with having her blood sugar checked in common areas. When informed that RN 1 did not ask the resident's permission and that she announced the results loudly with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) received the care and assistance needed related to trimming their fingernails for 2 of 7 residents reviewed for ADLs. (Residents 7 and 57)Findings include: 1. On 4/29/26 at 10:37 a.m., and again on 5/4/26 at 1:10 p.m., Resident 7 was observed lying in bed. The resident's fingernails were long, thick, and yellowed. The resident indicated she would like someone to cut her fingernails but had been told they could not cut them because she had a fungus in them. Record review for Resident 7 was completed on 5/4/26 at 9:47 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke, hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and depression. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/10/26, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident had an impairment on one side of her upper extremities for a functional limitation in range of motion. The resident required substantial maximal assistance for personal hygiene.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide activities designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for activities. (Resident 22)Finding includes:During random observations at the following dates and times, Resident 22 was observed lying in bed, the room quiet without television, music, or other stimulation: 4/29/26 at 11:31 a.m., 4/30/26 at 10:16 a.m. and 3:16 p.m., 5/1/26 at 10:13 a.m. and 2:53 p.m., 5/4/26 at 9:51 a.m., and 5/6/26 at 11:20 a.m. On 5/1/26 at 2:15 p.m., an activities event with live music was observed in the main dining room. Resident 22 remained in his quiet room, awake in bed.The record for Resident 22 was reviewed on 5/4/26 at 10:14 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's Disease and cerebrovascular disease.The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/10/26, indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent in ADLs and transfers.An Activities Care Plan, revised 4/27/26,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide oxygen at the correct flow rate and with protective padding as ordered for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 22)Finding includes:During random observations on 4/30/2026 at 10:16 a.m. and 2:07 p.m., and 5/4/2026 at 9:50 a.m., Resident 22 was resting in bed. Oxygen was in use via a nasal cannula (small, soft prongs that go into the nostrils) at 3.5 lpm (liters per minute). There was no padding in place on the cannula tubing. The record for Resident 22 was reviewed on 5/4/26 at 10:14 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's Disease, pneumonia, chronic respiratory failure, and dependence on supplemental oxygen. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/10/26, indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent for activities of daily living (ADLs). A Physician's Order, dated 3/24/2026, indicated oxygen at 4 lpm per nasal cannula, continuously. A Physician's Order, dated 3/26/2026, indicated padding to oxygen tubing, ensure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to promote antibiotic stewardship by ensuring the appropriate use of antibiotic therapy and a system of monitoring to improve resident outcomes and reduce antibiotic resistance related to a practitioner prescribing antibiotics for not true infections based on the McGeer Criteria (standardized definitions used for urinary tract infection (UTI) surveillance in long-term care, requiring both specific symptoms and microbiologic evidence) for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for urinary tract infections. (Residents 42 & 5)Findings include:1. During an interview on 4/30/26 at 9:50 a.m., Resident 42 indicated she has had frequent Urinary Tract Infections (UTI's) and as soon as the antibiotic was completed, the symptoms start again. During an interview on 5/6/26 at 9:30 a.m., the resident indicated she had seen an Urologist and had a procedure, however, she got sick with COVID and has not had the follow up appointment. She still would like to see this physician. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary manner and in good repair related to lack of monitoring of freezer, refrigerator, and dishwasher temperatures and food not labeled and dated, for 1 of 1 kitchen. This had the potential to affect 86 of 87 residents who resided in the facility and received food from the kitchen. Findings include: During the Initial Kitchen Sanitation Tour on 3/17/25 at 8:47 a.m., with the Kitchen Manager, the following was observed: 1. There was no thermometer in the walk-in freezer. 2. There was no thermometer in the reach-in cooler. 3. The dishwasher temperature log was already filled out for breakfast, lunch and dinner time temperature checks for 3/17/25. 4. There was an unlabeled and undated tray of pre-filled cups of juice in the walk-in refrigerator. 5. The following items were found undated in the walk-in freezer: a bag of cookies, a bag of bread, a package of unidentified meat, a container of ice cream, a bag of ground sausage, and an open box of tropical freezes. 6. The following…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement a resident's care plan related to positioning for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for limited range of motion (ROM). (Resident 33) Finding includes: During an observation on 3/17/25 at 10:00 a.m., Resident 33 was observed resting in bed. He had limited movement of his left arm and his left hand appeared contracted (unable to open). At that time, the resident indicated he could only open his left hand if he used his right hand to open it since he had had a stroke. There were no rails or bars present on the bed. During the following observations on 3/18/25 at 9:54 a.m., 3/19/25 at 10:37 a.m. and 3/20/25 at 11:00 a.m., the resident was lying in bed and there were no rails or bars present on his bed. The resident's record was reviewed on 3/20/25 at 10:06 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, disorders of the brain, vascular dementia, and chronic heart failure. The 2/24/25 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADLs) were completed for dependent residents, related to turning and repositioning for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for ADLs. (Resident 33) Finding includes: During an observation on 3/17/25 at 10:00 a.m., Resident 33 was observed resting in bed, lying on his back. He had limited movement of his left arm and his left hand appeared contracted (unable to open). During the following observations on 3/18/25 at 9:54 a.m. and 2:14 p.m., 3/19/25 at 10:37 a.m., and 3/20/25 at 9:35 a.m. and 11:00 a.m., the resident was lying in bed on his back. The resident's record was reviewed on 3/20/25 at 10:06 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, disorders of the brain, vascular dementia, and chronic heart failure. The 2/24/25 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment, and was dependent in ADLs (activities of daily living) and transfers. A review of a Care Plan, revised on 9/4/24, indicated the resident had hemiplegia (paralysis…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TLC MANAGEMENT — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 26% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN