Albany Health Care & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 66 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 68.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 102 beds and averages 79.4 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.81 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.66 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.04 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-08-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error when QMA1 administered the wrong medications to Resident B and Resident C. This deficient practice resulted in Resident B being sent to the hospital where she was diagnosed with accidental drug ingestion and received treatment for lack of adequate oxygen to the body tissues (acute hypoxia), low blood pressure (hypotension), and slow heart rate (bradycardia). Findings include: Review of a 8/14/23 facility-reported incident to the Indiana Department of Health indicated Residents B and C had been administered each other's medications on 8/12/23. Resident B required transfer to the hospital for treatment. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 8/16/2023 at 10:00 a.m. Diagnoses included, hypertension, presence of cardiac pacemaker, cognitive communication deficit, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and dementia. The resident was allergic to morphine. The resident's photograph had not been added to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide grooming assistance for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. (Resident 16) Findings include:During an observation, on 2/16/26 at 10:33 a.m., Resident 16 sat in a wheelchair in the dining room. He was unshaven. During an observation, on 2/17/26 at 10:11 a.m., Resident 16 sat in a wheelchair in his room. He was unshaven. During an observation, on 2/18/26 at 10:55 a.m., the resident sat in a wheelchair in the dining room. He was unshaven. Resident 16's clinical record was reviewed on 2/18/26 at 3:48 p.m. Diagnoses included altered mental status, dementia, other lack of coordination, other reduced mobility, and need for assistance with personal care. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/19/26, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. He required substantial/maximal staff assistance with personal hygiene. A current care plan, created 12/17/24, indicated the resident needed assistance with his activities of daily living (ADLs) related to activity…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow physician's wound treatment orders to promote healing of an arterial ulcer for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for skin conditions. (Resident 2)Finding includes:During an observation on 2/16/26 at 3:38 p.m., Resident 2 was in bed with a dressing on the right foot. The dressing included an orange bordered gauze, rolled gauze, and a net stocking.Resident 2's clinical record was reviewed on 2/20/26 at 1:50 p.m. Diagnoses included heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and reduced mobility.A wound treatment order, dated 12/23/25, included the following: Cleanse the pressure injury to the right dorsum foot with povidone iodine (antiseptic for wound), air dry, apply skin preparation, and place a foam dressing on day shift every day for wound healing. This order was discontinued on 2/18/26.A current wound treatment order, dated 2/12/26, included the following: Apply horseshoe pad to the right medial foot, paint area with povidone iodine (antiseptic for wound), and apply Alginate (wound dressing) between toes.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received appropriate catheter maintenance and services to prevent potential urinary tract infections for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for indwelling catheters. (Resident 16) Finding includes: During an observation, on 2/16/26 at 3:34 p.m., Resident 16 sat in his wheelchair in his room. His urinary catheter tubing, with cloudy, yellow urine, came from the resident's waistband and went down under the resident's wheelchair into a privacy bag. The catheter tubing under the wheelchair hung within the diameter of a pencil eraser from the floor. During an observation, on 2/17/26 at 10:11 a.m., the resident sat in his wheelchair in his room. His urinary catheter tubing was coiled on his lap. During an observation, on 2/18/26 at 11:51 a.m., the resident sat in his wheelchair in the dining room. His urinary catheter tubing hung down and rested on the floor, then went into a privacy bag. During an observation, on 2/18/26 at 12:07 p.m., the resident propelled himself in his wheelchair out of the dining…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide meal assistance to maintain nutritional status for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Residents 21) Finding includes:During a dining observation, on 2/18/26 at 12:04 p.m., Resident 21's meal assistance was provided by her visitor who sat on the right side of Resident 21and offered the resident several bites. The resident accepted one bite. The visitor switched seats and moved to a chair located on Resident 21's left side. After moving to Resident 21's left side, the resident consistently accepted every bite of food offered for the rest of the observation. Resident 21 drank fluids from a cup with a straw.During a continuous dining observation, on 2/19/26 at 8:20 a.m., a staff member sat on the right side of Resident 21. Resident 21's neck was bent forward, and her head was hanging downwards. The staff member offered two additional bites, which the resident did not accept. The staff member indicated Resident 21 did not eat well for breakfast and walked over to a kiosk and started charting. At…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were dated when opened and medication was discarded when expired for 1 of 3 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. (100 hall) Finding includes:During a medication storage observation of the 100 hall medication cart, accompanied by QMA 10 on 2/18/26 at 3:11p.m., the following was observed: Six bottles of eye drops were open and undated. Two metered dose inhalers were open and undated. One bottle of Robitussin DM (cough medicine) was open, undated, and had an expiration date of 9/2024. One bottle of Black Seed herbal supplement was open and undated. Nine bottles of Miralax (laxative) were open and undated. Two bottles of liquid Docusate Sodium were open and undated. One bottle of cough medication liquid was open and undated. One bottle of Lactulose (laxative) was open and undated. Five bottles of Milk of Magnesia (laxative) were open and undated. One bottle of saline nasal spray was open and undated. Two bottles of Flonase (steroid) nasal spray was open and undated. During an interview at the time…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to utilize proper hand hygiene and avoid touching food with bare hands during meal tray distribution for 4 of 9 opportunities during room meal tray deliveries on the 200 hall. Findings include:During an observation on 2/16/26 at 12:11 p.m., CNA 8 entered room [ROOM NUMBER]-D with a meal tray. She rearranged a book and cup on the overbed table prior to setting up the meal tray. Hand hygiene was not performed. CNA 8 then removed the dinner roll bare handed and set the dinner roll on top of the wrap it came in. On 2/16/26 at 12:19 p.m., CNA 8 entered room [ROOM NUMBER]-W with a meal tray. She took the dinner roll out of a plastic bag with her bare hands and placed it in front of the resident. During an interview on 2/16/26 at 3:03 p.m., CNA 8 indicated she probably should have washed her hands before touching residents' food. She used hand sanitizer after handing out lunch trays to avoid cross contamination. Hand hygiene was utilized for infection…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure implementation of care plan interventions to prevent falls for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls (Resident C). Finding includes: During an observation, on 1/14/26 at 11:28 a.m., Resident C sat in her wheelchair at a table in the dining room as CNA 3 assisted her with eating. The resident wore nonskid socks and a brace on her right foot/leg. Resident C's clinical record was reviewed on 1/14/26 at 2:39 p.m. Diagnoses included age related physical disability, syncope (fainting) and collapse, difficulty walking, and vascular dementia. The current orders included melatonin 10 mg daily at bedtime for insomnia (4/10/25), metoprolol tartrate 25 mg twice a day for hypertension - hold for systolic blood pressure less than 100 or heart rate less than 60 (7/9/25), and silent pressure alarm to bed (6/2/25). A modification of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/10/25, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. She used a walker and a wheelchair for mobility. She required…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from sexual abuse by another resident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Residents B and C) when a cognitively impaired male resident (Resident B) with a history of sexually charged behavior was observed in the lounge with his hand underneath the cognitively impaired female (Resident C) resident's shirt fondling her breast. Findings include:During an observation on 12/15/25 at 10:09 a.m., Resident B was seated in a recliner in the North Lounge with his feet elevated and his eyes closed. During an observation on 12/15/25 at 10:46 a.m., Resident C was seated in a Broda chair (high-backed wheelchair) in the hallway near the entrance to the North Lounge by the 300 Unit Nurses' station. She was awake, tracked with her eyes, but was unable to respond verbally when spoken to. Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 12/15/25 at 1:35 p.m. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side, unspecified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to immediately report an allegation of sexual abuse to the Administrator for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident C) Finding includes:A facility reported incident submitted to Indiana Department of Health (IDOH), dated 11/17/25 at 6:01 p.m. and submitted on 11/18/25, indicated staff were removing residents from the dining room following evening meal and placing them in the North Lounge. Staff assisted a resident to bed and returned to the North Lounge and found Resident B touching Resident C's breast. Review of the facility investigation file included a handwritten statement of the Administrator that indicated the Administrator and DON were notified of the incident between Resident B and Resident C on 11/17/25 at 8:25 p.m. During a telephone interview on 12/15/25 at 12:28 p.m., CNA 3 indicated she found Resident B in the North Lounge with his hand inside the front of Resident C's gown fondling her breast. The residents were separated then CNA 4 reported everything to RN 5. CNA 3 was talking to RN 6 later in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a cognitively impaired resident was free from staff-to-resident abuse as a result of physical retaliation to a combative resident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident B) This deficient practice had the potential to affect 19 of 77 residents in the facility who resided on the 300 Unit. The deficient practice was corrected on 6/27/25, prior to the start of survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. Finding includes: Review of a facility reported incident, dated 6/22/25 at 4:27 p.m., indicated the following: Description added On 6/22/25 the facility was notified Resident B reported to her daughter that she had bruising to bilateral hands due to a staff member holding onto her arms last night. CNA 3 was the staff member involved. Type of Injury included dark purple bruises to bilateral wrists and the left hand. The resident denied pain to the areas. Immediate Action Taken included notifications to the physician, family, DON, and the Administrator. The staff member involved was suspended pending an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TLC MANAGEMENT — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 28% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN