Creekside Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 113 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 48 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 109.6 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.01 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.46 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.31 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.29 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident with adequate assistance of two staff members for bed mobility during perineal care resulting in a fall from bed, and ensure a transfer from the wheelchair to the toilet was performed in accordance with the plan of care for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents and 1 of 5 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 60 falling and sustaining a fracture of the left upper arm. (Resident 1, Resident 60, and Resident B) Findings include: 1a. The clinical record for Resident 60 was reviewed on 1/9/25 at 9:55 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, bone density disorder, abnormalities of gait and mobility, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, and stroke with hemiplegia (paralysis one side of body) affecting left non-dominant side. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/7/24, indicated Resident 60 was cognitively intact. The resident had impairment on upper and lower of one side of the body. The resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to correctly document a resident's anti-psychiatric medication use on the annual Minimum Data Set assessment for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for use of accuracy of assessments. (Resident D) Findings include:The clinical record of Resident D was reviewed on 3-26-26 at 12:25 p.m. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to delusional disorder (serious psychotic disorder characterized by the presence of one or more fixed, false beliefs that persist for at least one month) and anxiety. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a tool to track, review, and report the high-risk medications a nursing home resident received), dated 2-6-26, indicated under the medication section, the resident had not received any anti-psychotic medications. A review of Resident D's physician orders, revised on 9/5/25, indicated the resident was prescribed, by the physician, risperidone .025 milligrams twice daily (an anti-psychotic medication) for a diagnosis of delusional disorder. The medication administration records (MAR) for January and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' dignity was maintained and respected by not using cell phones while assisting with eating (Resident ZZ), and staff turning off the call lights and not returning to the residents' room to provide the services that had been requested (Residents' C, D, E, F, G, H, J, K, L, M, N, P, Q, R, S, T, and V) for 18 of 109 residents reviewed for dignity. Findings include: 1.The Resident Council Minutes binder was provided by the Activities Director on 2/5/26 at 11:00 a.m. The council minutes, dated November 20, 2025, indicated staff were turning off the call lights and not providing the service requested. A resident council meeting was conducted on 2/5/26 at 1:36 p.m. The resident attendees were Residents' C, D, E, F, G, H, J, K, L, M, N, P, Q, R, S and T. During the meeting, they indicated call light response was a problem. It had been brought up in previous resident council meetings and had not been addressed. The staff would come into the room, turn the call light off and indicate they would let…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely address a resident's skin condition; to ensure a resident's fall interventions were implemented; to obtain a resident's heart rate and medication hold perimeters were followed; address a resident's ear wax buildup; to ensure weights were obtained and the provider was notified of out of parameter weights for 5 of 10 residents reviewed for Quality of Care. (Residents BB, 86, 3, E, and V) Findings include: 1 The clinical record for Resident BB was reviewed on 2/5/26 at 2:52 p.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, quadriplegia (loss of sensation and function of all four limbs and torso). A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, completed 11/10/25, indicated he was cognitively intact, frequently incontinent of urine, and dependent for toilet hygiene. He had no moisture associated skin damage (MASD). A shower sheet, dated 12/2/25, indicated Resident BB had a bed bath. There were no skin areas of concern marked on the shower sheet. A shower sheet, dated 12/9/25, indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff donned Personal Protective Equipment(PPE) prior to entering a room of a resident in contact isolation precautions and prior to performing tracheostomy care for a resident in enhanced barrier precautions, to ensure hand hygiene was performed after doffing (removing) gloves, and to ensure a resident's catheter bag was correctly positioned for 1 resident randomly observed for contact isolation, 1 of 1 resident reviewed for tracheostomy and 2 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary catheter care (Resident 22, Resident 1,and Resident 80).Findings include:1 The clinical record for Resident 22 was reviewed on 2/9/26 at 3:21 p.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, hypertension (high blood pressure). On 2/9/26 at 3:21 p.m., Resident 22's room was observed to have a sign posted on the door frame that indicated she was in Contact Isolation Precautions. An isolation cart was located outside of her door and contained disposable gowns and gloves. Registered Dietician (RD) 4 did not have an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
  Provide appropriate foot care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided with heel protective boots, as ordered, and ensure timely follow-up with podiatry services for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for foot care. (Resident V) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident V was reviewed on 2/6/26 at 12:00 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral palsy (neurological disorder that permanently affects body movement), seizure disorder (recurrent, unprovoked seizures), and aphasia (impaired ability to speak, write, and understand language). An interview was conducted with Family Member 4 on 2/6/26 at 12:01 p.m. The family member indicated there was an ongoing issue at the facility with them not trimming Resident V's toenails.The ADL care plan, with a revision date of 8/26/25, indicated Resident V required total staff assistance with his activities of daily living. The current physician's order, dated 3/24/20, indicated the resident was to always have Prevalon boots (a heel protection boot for pressure relief) on every…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident's palm protector, per his functional maintenance program, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for limited range of motion. (Resident V) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident V was reviewed on 2/6/26 at 12:00 p.m. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to: contractures (a permanent or long-term tightening, shortening, and hardening of muscles, tendons, ligaments, or skin, causing joint deformity and reduced, painful range of motion). An observation of Resident V was made in his room on 2/5/26 at 3:00 p.m. He was sitting in his wheelchair in his room and his left hand was contracted. The resident had no splint, carrot, or pal protector in place. There were no physician's orders for a splint, carrot, or palm protector for the resident's left hand. The ADL care plan, revised 8/26/25, indicated the resident needed total assistance with his activities of daily living. The interventions were for staff to encourage him to wear his left-hand palm protector for up to 4 to 8…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely implement provision of a resident's nutritional supplements for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 25) Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 25 was reviewed on 2/6/26 at 12:30 p.m. Her diagnosis included, but was not limited to, dementia (mental decline). An interview was conducted with Family Member 2 on 2/6/26 at 12:38 p.m. The family member indicated Resident 25 hadn't been eating very well lately and had lost weight. The weights in the vitals section of the electronic health record indicated the resident had the following weights on the following dates: -On 1/12/26, the resident weighed 145.8 pounds-On 1/22/26, the resident weighed 149.8 pounds-On 1/26/26, the resident weighed 150 pounds-On 2/01/26, the resident weighed 142.8 pounds-On 2/02/26, the resident weighed 142.4 pounds The nutrition care plan, revised on 1/13/26, indicated the resident's intervention was for her to receive her diet, as ordered. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with dignity and respect for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for dignity. (Resident B)Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 8/21/25 at 12:10 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, depression and pain in the right knee. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, completed 8/5/25, indicated he was moderately cognitively impaired and had severe signs and symptoms of depression.A Psychological Progress Note, dated 8/12/25, indicated he was oriented to person, place, and had mild impairment in thought process. On 8/21/25 at 12:40 p.m., Resident B was observed in his room. He was sitting in his wheelchair by his bed, and the room door was closed. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 2 opened the door without knocking. CNA 2 asked Resident B if he was okay and if he had his call light. Resident B responded that he was fine. CNA 2 exited the room, closing the door behind her. Resident B indicated the staff come into his room often without knocking and it…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely notify a resident's representative of a medication change for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for changes of condition. (Resident C) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 5/27/25 at 10:55 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia and rheumatoid arthritis. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, completed 4/9/25, indicated Resident C was cognitively intact. A progress note, dated 1/15/25, indicated nursing staff had reported increased confusion and lethargy since taking Baclofen (a muscle relaxant) 10 milligrams (mg). Due to the resident's fatigue, there was a concern for the use of multiple medications at the same time, and several medications were discontinued, including Baclofen. A progress note, dated 5/6/25, indicated Resident C was experiencing chronic muscle spasms and was taking Tizanidine (medication used to treat muscle spasms) to manage her pain. The resident continued to experience muscle spasms and pain despite the use of the medication. Due to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document the reason for transferring a resident to a local hospital and ensured communication to the receiving health facility for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge rights. (Resident B) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 5/27/25 at 10:30 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, multiple sclerosis and hypertension. A care plan, last revised on 4/15/25, indicated Resident B's plan was to discharge home with her spouse. The goal was for her to be discharged home. The interventions included, but were not limited to, arrange for and set up community resources and to educate her on her clinical condition and medications as needed. A Medicare Part A Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, completed 5/5/25, indicated Resident B's Medicare Part A payment coverage ended on 5/5/25. A physician's order, dated 5/5/25, indicated Resident B was to be evaluated and treated by hospice services. A physician's order, dated 5/5/25, indicated she was not to be resuscitated (DNR). A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TLC MANAGEMENT — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN