No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Twin Lakes Extended Care

310 Eads Avenue, Paris, IL 61944 · For profit - Corporation · 56 certified beds · (217) 465-5395 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Dec 2023Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$71,455 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2023
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (29) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $71,455 in federal fines (most recent 2023-12-14)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
476 Buckeye St · (812) 232-2683 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
719 E Court St · (217) 465-4114 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
302 W Jasper St · (217) 465-6032 · Call to confirm hours
Park
515 E Wood St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
707 E Wood St · (217) 463-9802

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.2%13.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight19.2%6.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms18.8%54.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.8%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.1%14.3%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.0%18.3%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%91.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.0%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control12.3%20.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table1.1%21.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine77.4%63.1%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.9%26.1%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit21.7%13.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.892.021.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.222.221.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 31 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

39.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.21U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.04hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF39.9%CMS range 27.4–54.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.2%CMS range 5.6–15.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay10.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.111.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.52
RN hours/ resident / day
0.65
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.54
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.71
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.36
RN hoursweekends
41.0%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 56 beds and averages 39.6 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.89 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-06-25)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2023-05-18)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from sexual abuse by another resident by failing to supervise a resident (R1) with known sexual behaviors from making non-consensual sexual contact with another resident (R2) and failed to protect other vulnerable residents (R4, R5), from inappropriate sexual behaviors by another resident (R1). These failures affect four (R1, R2, R4, R5) of eight residents reviewed for abuse in the sample list of eight residents. These failures resulted in (R1) having unrestricted access to (R2) resulting in (R2) being sexually abused by (R1). Based on V17's (R2's Power of Attorney) statement that R2 would have been angry, upset, sad and would have fought back if R2 did not have Dementia it can be determined that R2 would have experienced psychosocial harm (e.g., embarrassment, humiliation, anxiety) because of the sexual abuse. These failures also resulted in R4 experiencing psychosocial harm as evidenced by V18 (R4's Power of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was properly supervised during a transfer with a mechanical lift. This failure resulted in a fall for one resident (R1) of three reviewed for accidents, causing an acute break to both sides of the nasal bones as well as a break in the nasal septum and a laceration to the nose. Findings Include:The facility's Policy and Procedure for Use of a Mechanical Lift, dated November 1, 2025, and revised September 2, 2025, states the purpose of using a mechanical lift is to assist in lifting residents who are too heavy to lift manually, to promote comfort, and to maintain proper body alignment while residents are being moved. The procedure includes ensuring the resident is placed comfortably in the chair by grasping the top of the sling with one hand and pulling back on the sling while lowering the resident into the chair. Staff may also gently push on the resident's knees while lowering the resident into the chair to ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one resident (R1) of three residents reviewed for accidents in a sample list of three was not entrapped in the mechanism of a recliner chair prior to lowering the footrest. This failure caused (R1) to sustain a 12 Centimeter laceration requiring 13 sutures to close. Findings include: R1's Diagnoses list printed 9/25/23 includes the following diagnoses: Age-Related Osteoporosis, Hypertension, Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease, Anxiety Disorder, Chronic Atrial Fibrillation, Repeated Falls, and Dementia. R1's Brief interview of Mental Status dated 6/29/23 documents R1 scored 3/15 on her Brief Interview of Mental Status indicating R1 is severely cognitively impaired. R1's Progress Note dated 8/25/2023 at 10:13PM documents CNA (V3, Certified Nurse's Aide) getting (R1) ready to transfer and was putting recliner down. (R1's) legs were in between recliner and where it closes, (V3) didn't notice (R1's) legs were hanging off due to blanket covering (R1's) legs. Resident stated 'Oww' and (V3) noted legs were hanging off sideways…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to protect a resident's right to dignity for two of two residents (R1, R11) by another resident (R5) reviewed for dignity in the total resident sample list of 27. Findings Include: The State of Illinois Ombudsman Program, Resident Rights in Long Term Care Facilities dated 11/2018 documents that all residents have a right to dignity and respect and the facility must care for residents in a manner that promotes their quality of life. The facility must provide services to keep each resident's mental health at the highest practical level. On 6/24/24 at 1:20 PM R11 stated R5 is very loud and constantly talking and he makes derogatory and prejudice comments as well as false comments. R11 states this makes him uncomfortable, bothers him a lot and also bothers others in the room. R11 stated he will often forgo activities or community outings if R5 is going because he doesn't want to be subjected to the negativity. R11 stated he has not complained…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement interventions in response to signs and symptoms of shortness of breath for a resident and ensure respiratory tubing is maintained in a sanitary manner for a resident receiving oxygen therapy. These failures affect one (R183) of three resident's reviewed for respiratory care from a total sample list of 27 residents. Findings include: The Facility provided Respiratory Assessment Policy dated 8/2003 documents that respiratory assessments and interventions are to be documented in the resident's medical record. R183's undated diagnoses sheet documents diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Chronic Respiratory Failure. R183's care plan dated 6/19/2024 documents to monitor R183 for signs and symptoms of respiratory distress and to report to the physician changes in respiratory condition including respirations, pulse oximetry, tachycardia, restlessness, diaphoresis, headaches, lethargy, confusion, atelectasis, hemoptysis, cough, pleuritic pain, accessory muscle usage and skin color.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to document psychotropic medication assessments, identify and track targeted behaviors, and attempt non-pharmacological behavioral interventions for two (R15, R20) of five residents reviewed for psychotropic medication in a sample list of 27 residents. Findings Include: The facility's policy Psychotropic Medication Policy revised 11/28/17 states Residents who receive antipsychotic drugs shall receive gradual dose reduction and behavioral interventions, unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue these drugs. Any resident receiving psychotropic medications will be reviewed at minimum of every quarter by the interdisciplinary team. 1. R15's Care Plan revised 6/25/24 includes the following diagnoses: Major Depression and Mild Dementia with Anxiety. R15's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for June 2024 includes the following active physician's orders for Psychotropic Medication: Sertraline HCL (antidepressant) Give 75 milligrams by mouth one time a day. Aripiprazole (antipsychotic) 20 milligrams by mouth in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to dispose of expired schedule two narcotics for one (R6) of three residents reviewed for medications from a total sample list of 27 residents. Findings Include: The facility provided Procurement and Storage of Medications Policy dated [DATE] documents that all discontinued/expired non-controlled medications are to be removed from the active medication storage area, and the quantity should be noted on the medication sheet. All medications should then be returned to pharmacy or destroyed per facility policy as soon as practical. All controlled substances are to be destroyed according to the facility policy and procedure. R6 's undated physician order sheet documents an order for Morphine 20 milligrams per milliliter per 30 milliliter bottle, administer .25 milliliters, sublingually as needed, every four hours as needed for pain. On [DATE] at 9:30AM, two bottles of Morphine Sulphate were in cart two's narcotic box. One bottle had 13 cubic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-12-14 · tag F0836 — widespread
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to employ a full time licensed Administrator. This failure has the potential to affect all 33 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's census sheet provided by V1 Administrator in Training documents there are 33 residents residing in the facility. On 11/30/23 from 9:45 AM to 3:30 PM and on 12/11/23 from 9:00 AM to 3:00 PM, there was not a licensed Administrator in the facility. On 12/12/23 at 10:05 AM, V25 Corporate Licensed Nursing Home Administrator stated she is the Administrator for the facility since V1 is an Administrator in Training. V25 stated she is present in the facility 16 hours a week.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-14 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow its Abuse Prohibition Policy by failing to determine the risk of abuse for six of eight residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R7, and R8) reviewed for abuse on the sample list of eight. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prevention Program with a Revision date of 11/28/2016 documents, Resident Assessment. As part of the resident social history assessment, staff will identify residents with increased vulnerability for abuse or who have needs and behaviors that might lead to conflict. Through the care planning process, staff will identify any problems, goals, and approaches, which would reduce the chances of mistreatment, neglect, and abuse of these residents. On 12/11/23, R1, R2, R3, R4, R7, and R8's medical records nor care plan contained their risk for abuse. On 12/12/23 at 2:30 PM, V6 Care Plan Coordinator stated prior to 12/12/23 the residents' risk for abuse was not determined and was not added to the care plans. On 12/12/23 at 3:00 PM, V1 Administrator in Training stated the facility's Abuse Prevention policy does…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify a resident's power of attorney of a change in dosage of an antipsychotic medication and a change in behavior for one of eight residents (R1) reviewed for change in resident condition in a sample of eight. Findings include: R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from a behavioral management facility. R1 was on a regimen of antipsychotic medication Zyprexa 5mg BID (twice a day) for inappropriate behaviors. R1 was seen by the Psychiatrist on 9/11/23. The Psychiatrist decreased R1's Zyprexa from 5mg BID to 2.5 mg BID. The following Facility Notes document behaviors R1 demonstrated after R1's Zyprexa dosage was decreased: 10/5/23- R1 attempted to enter R4's room several times on 10/5/23 at 11:10 PM when R4 yelled at R1 to get out of her room. 10/6/23-R1 followed R4 into different rooms and the dining room even after R4 told R1, R4 did not want R1 to follow R4 or be around R4. 10/6/23--R1 was witnessed playing with R4's hair when R4 screamed not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report allegations of resident to resident abuse to the Administrator for three (R1, R4, and R5) of eight residents reviewed for abuse in the sample list of eight. Findings include: 1. R1's Behavior Note dated 10/6/2023 on 4:27 PM, written by V5 LPN documents, (R1) playing with (R4's) hair and (R4) screamed not wanting to be bothered. R1's Alert Note dated 10/7/2023 at 12:24 PM, written by V5 LPN documents, (R1) went into (R4's) room around 10:40 PM, woke (R4) up by trying to touch (R4), (R4) yelled no and for him to get out. CNA (Certified Nurse's Aide) removed him from the room and asked him to stop, that's a lady's room and to go back to his own room. R1's Behavior Note dated 10/7/2023 at 12:25 PM, written by V5 LPN documents, (R1) keeps following (R4) around after meals, scaring (R4) and (R4) is yelling out loud. We have asked him to leave (R4) alone, removed him from the area, removed (R4) from the area, he still wheels himself to where (R4) is located. On 12/11/23 at 3:00 PM, V1 Administrator stated the staff should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement/update interventions following an accident/fall for two residents (R1, R3) of three residents reviewed for care plans in a sample list of three residents. Findings include: The facility's policy Fall Prevention revised 11/10/18 states Immediately after any resident fall the unit nurse will assess the resident and provide any care and treatment needed for the resident. A fall huddle will be conducted with staff on duty to help identify circumstances of the event and appropriate interventions. The unit nurse will place documentation of the circumstances of the fall in the nurse's notes or on an AIMS for wellness form along with any new interventions deemed to be appropriate at the time. 1. R1's Progress Note dated 8/25/2023 at 10:13PM documents CNA (V3, Certified Nurse's Aide) getting (R1) ready to transfer and was putting recliner down. (R1's) legs were in between recliner and where it closes, (V3) didn't notice (R1's) legs were hanging off due to blanket covering (R1's) legs. Resident stated 'Oww' and (V3) noted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from resident to resident physical abuse. This failure affected four of four residents (R1, R2, R11, R15) reviewed for staff mistreatment in the sample of 16. Findings Include: The facility's Abuse Prevention Program dated 11/28/16 documents the facility affirms the rights of the residents to be free from abuse. The policy defines physical abuse as hitting, slapping, punching, and kicking. 1. R1's Medical Diagnoses dated August 2023 documents R1 is diagnosed with Dementia. R1's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R1 is severely cognitively impaired. R1's Psychosocial Evaluation dated 7/5/23 documents R1 is disruptive, disorientated, experiences difficulty with impulse control, is delusional, gets agitated, angry, aggressive, shows physical aggression, is physically abusive, and verbally abusive. R1's Care Plan dated 3/15/23 documents R1 has a behavior problem when other residents are near the table she eats at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 16 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately report an allegation of resident to resident physical abuse to V1 Administrator. This failure affected four of four residents (R1, R2, R11, R15) reviewed for staff mistreatment in the sample of 16. Findings Include: The facility's Abuse Prevention Program dated 11/28/16 documents the facility affirms the rights of the residents to be free from abuse. The policy defines physical abuse as hitting, slapping, punching, and kicking. The policy documents employees are required to immediately report any potential or alleged abuse to their supervisor and administrator. 1. R1's Medical Diagnoses dated August 2023 documents R1 is diagnosed with Dementia. R1's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R1 is severely cognitively impaired. R1's Psychosocial Evaluation dated 7/5/23 documents R1 is disruptive, disorientated, experiences difficulty with impulse control, is delusional, gets agitated, angry, aggressive, shows physical aggression, is physically…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain proper sanitation of serving utensils. This failure has the potential to affect all 36 residents residing in facility. Findings include: Daily Census Report dated 5/15/23 documents 36 residents residing in facility. On 5/15/23 at 7:30 AM Observed the commercial coffee pot dripping brown liquid from the front of the spigot. The Coffee pot was sitting on the kitchen counter directly above an open utensil drawer. Coffee was dripping from the coffee pot directly into the utensil drawer onto the serving utensils. Multiple serving spoons in the drawer of various sizes were covered with small brown dry spots. The bottom of the drawer was splattered with dried brown spots. On 5/15/23 at 7:35 AM V6 Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) stated That coffee pot has been dripping into the utensil drawer ever since they (supplier) moved it to the counter. It used to sit somewhere else so we (staff) could put something under it to catch the drips. Now it just drips all day into the utensil drawers. We (staff) use those…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0912 — widespread
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide bedrooms that measure at least 80 square feet per resident bed for 28 resident rooms 2,4-11, and 14-32. Findings include: Historical room documentation and actual onsite measurements on 5/16/23 at 11:10 AM with V14 Maintenance Director, determine rooms 2, 4 through 11, and 14 through 32 are undersized, providing only 77.3 square feet per resident bed. The most recent Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Certification and Transmittal undated, documents 56 of the facility's 62 beds are certified Title 18 (Medicare) and/or Title 19 (Medicaid). Rooms 2, and 4 through 11 are double occupancy and dually certified for Medicare and Medicaid, while rooms 14 through 32 are double occupancy and certified for Medicaid. The facility's Daily Roster dated 5/14/23, documents 36 of these 56 certified beds are occupied by residents residing in the facility. On 5/16/23 at 11:20 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated, the rooms that we have waivers for not being the correct size are in the Annual Long Term Care Survey…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for four of 12 residents (R15, R16, R21, R33) reviewed for care plans in the sample list of 22. Findings include: The facility's Comprehensive Care Planning policy with a revised date of 11/1/17 documents, It is the policy of (the facility) to comprehensively assess and periodically reassess each Resident admitted to this facility. The results of this Resident assessment shall serve as the basis for determining each Resident's strengths, needs, goals, life history and preferences to develop a person centered comprehensive plan of care for each Resident that will describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintaining the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Components of the CPC (Comprehensive Care Plan) may include: e. Care Plan - Plan of care describing a need/problem and indicating approaches/interventions to be instituted to assist the Resident in maintaining/receiving care in relation to the need/problem. 1.) R15's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete wound treatments for one of four residents (R5) reviewed for wound care in the sample list of 22 residents. Findings include: R5's Medication Administration Record dated 5/1/23 through 5/31/23 documents diagnoses including Age Related Physical Debility, Cerebral Palsy, Functional Urinary Incontinence and Mental Disorder. R5's Nurse's Note dated 4/25/23 at 9:40 AM by V16 Wound Nurse documents R5 has MASD (Moisture Associated Skin Damage) to the buttocks and R5 was seen by the Wound Physician. R5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R5 had MASD. R5's Wound Assessment and Plan dated 4/4/23 by V22 Wound Nurse Practitioner, documents Wound Type as MASD and a treatment order to cleanse area, pat dry well, Zinc Barrier Cream 20% or greater, apply every shift and as needed and every half day cleanse wound with normal saline or sterile water, apply to wound bed, cover with dry clean dressing and as instructed, (disinfectant/antiseptic). R5's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to transcribe physician orders and complete wound treatments and pressure risk assessments for one of four residents (R33) reviewed for wound care in a sample list of 22 residents. Findings include: R33's undated Face Sheet documents an admission date of 3/17/23 with medical diagnoses of Displaced Bimalleolar Fracture of Right Lower Leg, Atrial Fibrillation and Congestive Heart Failure. R33's Pressure Ulcer Risk assessment dated [DATE] documents R33 as high risk for skin breakdown. R33's Medical Record does not document any further Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessments after R33's Stage 2 Right Inner Ankle Pressure Ulcer was identified on 4/25/23. R33's Skin Only Evaluation dated 4/26/23 documents a Right Inner Ankle Stage 2 Pressure Ulcer measuring 3.0 centimeters (cm) long by 2.0 cm wide by 0.1 cm deep. This same evaluation documents R33's Stage 2 Right Inner Ankle Pressure Ulcer was first noted at the Physician office after cast removal. R33's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-05-17 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required eight hours of Registered Nurse staffing coverage per 24-hour period for three of fifteen days reviewed for staffing. This failure has the potential to affect all 33 residents in the facility. Findings include: The facility Nurse Schedule (May 2022) documents the facility did not have any Registered Nurse working anytime on 5/1/2022, 5/8/2022, and 5/15/2022. The same schedule documents no Registered Nurse is scheduled to work in the facility on 5/22/2022 and 5/29/2022. On 5/15/2022 at 10:58AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) reported the facility did not have any Registered Nurse working any hours on the above days. V2 reported the facility only has one part-time Registered Nurse. The facility Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report (5/16/2022) documents 33 residents reside in the facility.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to notify the physician of low blood sugar and that insulin was not administered for one (R28) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in the sample list of 20. Findings include: R28's May 2022 Physician's Orders document an order to obtain R28's blood sugar before meals and bedtime and notify the physician for blood sugars of 70 or below; and an order dated 11/15/21 to administer Novolog (insulin) 45 units subcutaneous three times daily with meals. There is no order for parameters to hold R28's Novolog. R28's May 2022 Medication Administration Record documents R28's blood sugar at 11:00 AM was 57 on 5/5, 51 on 5/9, 50 on 5/10, 53 on 5/14, 44 on 5/15, and 56 on 5/16, and R28's Novolog was not administered on the dates listed. There is no documentation in R28's medical record that R28's physician was notified of R28's blood sugars and that Novolog was not administered on the dates listed. On 05/16/22 at 11:48 AM V13 Licensed Practical Nurse administered R28's noon medications. V13 did not administer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-17 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — pattern
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to conduct periodic safety inspections of side rails in use for six residents (R20, R11, R184, R19, R22, and R28) of seven residents reviewed for side rails in a sample of 20 residents. Findings Include: Physician's Order Sheets for R20, R11, R184, R19, R22, and R28 dated 5/1/22 through 5/31/22 include physician's orders for half side rails to enable residents to assist with bed mobility. On 5/17/22 at 11:00AM R22 was not in her bed, but the half side rails were up and in place to both sides of the bed. The rails were attached loosely to the bed by only the adjustment handle in the center of the rails. The rail could be turned in a complete circle by gentle pressure to either end of the rail. On 5/17/22 at 10:45AM V6, Maintenance Director stated, do spot checks on the side rails, but I can't find the check list for every bed that has rails. On 5/17/22 at 11:00AM V3, Administrator in training stated, We don't have any documentation to support the periodic audits for side rails. There were no side rail safety audits…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a care plan for anticoagulant use for one (R11) of 20 residents reviewed for care plans in the sample list of 20. Findings include: R11's May 2022 Physician's Orders documents an order for Eliquis (anticoagulant) 2.5 milligrams by mouth twice daily. R11's Care Plan with a revision date of 4/19/22 does not document R11's use of an anticoagulant or interventions for monitoring for complications associated with anticoagulant use. On 5/17/22 at 2:48 PM V5 Care Plan coordinator stated R11's care plan does not include a problem area or interventions for anticoagulant use.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to administer a nutritional supplement and accurately assess for significant weight loss for two (R32, R22) of four residents reviewed for nutrition in the sample list of 20. 1. R22's May 2022 Physician's Orders document R28's diet includes a frozen nutritional supplement with lunch and supper. R22's 2021 Weight Log documents R22 weighed 193.5 lbs (pounds) in August, 188 lbs in November and 193 lbs in December. R22's 2022 Weight Log documents R22 weighed 188 lbs in January, 165.7 lbs in February (an 11.8% loss in 1 month, and 14.37% loss in 6 months), and 166.2 lbs in March (13.89% loss in 3 months). R22's March and May 2022 Medication Administration Records document R22 weighed 163.4 lbs on 3/22, and 169.2 lbs on 5/10. R22's Dietary Notes document the following: On 2/16/22 R22 had an 11.06 % weight loss (21 lbs) in 3 months, and 13.59% loss (26.5 lbs) in 6 months. On 3/10/22 R22 had significant weight loss of 13.89% in 3 months and 13.93% in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-17 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record the facility failed to safely install side rails for two residents (R18, R22) of seven residents reviewed for side rails in a sample list of 20 residents. Findings Include: 1. R18's Bed Rail assessment dated [DATE] documents R18 uses side rails to promote independence in turning from side to side. R18's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R18 is moderately cognitively impaired and requires an extensive assist of staff to complete bed mobility and transfer. On 5/16/22 at 10:30AM R18 was in bed. Half side rails were up and in place to both sides of the bed. R18 was lying on her left side. Her mattress had slipped to the left side leaving a six inch gap between the edge of the mattress and the side rail. The springs on the bed were exposed in this gap. On 5/17/22 at 10:45AM V6, Maintenance Director stated I measure the distance from the side rails to the edge of the mattress when the mattress in centered in the bed. I never thought of it slipping and not being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to identify specific behaviors and targeted nonpharmacological interventions to warrant the use of psychotropic medications and failed to complete psychotropic medication assessments for one of five residents (R29) reviewed for unnecessary medications in the sample list of 20. Findings include: R29's Diagnosis List documents R29's diagnosis include Dementia, Depression, Anxiety and Psychotic Disorder. R29's May 2022 Physician's Orders document an order for Trazodone (antidepressant) 50 milligrams (mg) by mouth daily, an order for Lorazepam (antianxiety) 1 mg by mouth three times daily, and an order dated 2/24/22 for Seroquel (antipsychotic) 100 mg by mouth daily. R29's February 2022 Behavior Tracking documents R29 takes Ativan (Lorazepam), Trazodone, and Zoloft (antidepressant), and R29's targeted behavior is episodes of tearfulness. This form does not document behavior tracking for R29's obsessive compulsive behaviors or what nonpharmacological interventions to use in response to the behaviors. R29's Nursing Notes document…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-06-25 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet of floor space per resident bed in 28 of 56 resident rooms at the facility, 28 of these rooms were occupied by residents. This failure affects all 31 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Historical room documentation and actual onsite measurements on 6/25/24 at 12:00PM with V13 Maintenance Director, determined rooms 2, 4 through 11, and 14 through 32 are undersized; providing either 73.11 square feet per resident bed in rooms 9-11, 14-24; and 75.65 square feet in rooms 2, 4-8, 25-32. The most recent Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Certification and Transmittal undated, documents 56 of the facility's 62 beds are certified Title 18 (Medicare) and/or Title 19 (Medicaid). Rooms 2, and 4 through 11 are double occupancy and dually certified for Medicare and Medicaid, while rooms 14 through 32 are double occupancy and certified for Medicaid. The facility's Daily Roster dated 6/23/24, documents 31 of these 56 certified beds are occupied by residents residing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
  • No harm found · C2023-05-18 · tag F0576 — widespread
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to deliver mail to residents on Saturdays. This failure has the potential to affect all 36 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 5/16/23 at 10:12 AM, during the Resident Council Meeting with the residents, residents (R1, R4, R5, R12, R20, R27, R28, R33, R139) present at the meeting, stated we do not get mail on Saturdays. On 5/16/23 at 11:04 AM, V1 Administrator stated the residents don't get mail on Saturdays but the mail is delivered to the facility on Saturdays. V1 stated V1 and V3, Business Office Manager, (BOM) and office people are not here on Saturdays. V1 stated there is no one here on Saturdays to deliver the mail to the residents. V1 stated a manager is on duty on Saturdays but usually from 8:00 AM to 12PM and the mail comes after that time. The facility's Illinois Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, Residents' Rights for People in Long Term Care Facilities, undated, documents your facility must deliver your mail promptly. The Daily Census Report dated 5/15/23 documents 36 residents residing in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-05-17 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post required nursing staffing information. This failure has the potential to affect all 33 residents in the facility. Findings include: On 5/17/2022 at 11:02AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) reported the required nurse staffing information was posted for view in the North Hall. On 5/17/2022 at 11:02AM, Daily Nursing Staffing sheets (4/27/2022-5/17/2022) were located at standing eye level in a plastic sheet protector hanging from a hook on the wall in North Hall, an area not readily accessible to all residents and visitors. All of the sheets were reversed, with the blank side of the sheets facing outward to the viewer, and no indication anywhere of the reversed sheets containing the required nurse staffing information. None of the staffing sheets contained a resident census number. V2 reported the facility staffing information has always been hung on the wall as above. The facility Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report (5/16/2022) documents 33 residents reside in the facility.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$71,455 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $71,455 — penalty dated 2023-12-14
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-01-06 for 4 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to STERN CONSULTANTS — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ETN FAMILY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/22/2025
THE ESTATE OF PETER SCHORROrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
STERN, BEZALELIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2024
COM FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST12%since 12/01/2024
MILLMAN, CHAIMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
NEWHOUSE, ERICIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
TLCO HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2024
DEAN, GENETTIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
ERBLICH, AVRAHAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
FRIEDMAN, BENJAMINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
SHEPS, BORUCHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
ZAMAN, ASADIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
NEWHOUSE, TEMIIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-9.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$676K
Related-party expense19% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 9%Other / private 25%

This home reported $676K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$287per resident / day
operating cost
$8,728per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$261per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145466. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-06-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next