No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Northwoods Rehab And Nursing Center At Moravia

7 Keeler Avenue, Moravia, NY 13118 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 40 certified beds · (315) 497-0440 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (315) 497-0440 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited Nov 2025
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (20) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (64%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
66 Central St · (315) 497-1497 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
130 Main St · (315) 497-9600 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1 Cayuga St · (315) 497-1911 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.9%14.1%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight11.0%5.8%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.8%1.3%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms13.8%19.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.6%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.9%12.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.8%13.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.4%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.5%6.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.4%19.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.4%13.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.0%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.3%20.6%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.0%9.6%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.191.701.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.981.361.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 27 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.31U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.6%CMS range 35.3–65.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.1%CMS range 5.9–15.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.101.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.37
RN hours/ resident / day
1.06
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.14
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.58
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.24
RN hoursweekends
64.2%
Total nursing turnover
85.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 40 beds and averages 35.3 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.70 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-11-18)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-13)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2025-11-18 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 9/22/2025-9/25/2025, the facility did not ensure there were services of a Registered Nurse for at least eight consecutive hours, seven days a week. Specifically, the facility did not provide eight (8) consecutive hours of Registered Nurse coverage on 9/6/2025, 9/14/2025, 9/15/2025-9/18/2025, and 9/21/2025 as required, and did not have a waiver. Findings include:The Facility Assessment, revised 4/22/2025, documented the number of licensed beds was 40, and the average daily census was 35. The facility resources needed to provide competent resident support and care daily and during emergencies was: 1 Director of Nursing, 1 Assistant Director of Nursing, 1 Infection Preventionist, 2 Registered Nurses, 7 Licensed Practical Nurses, and 15 Certified Nursing Assistants. Additionally, federal law required nursing homes had sufficient staff to meet the needs of residents and included services of a Registered Nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. During an entrance conference interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 9/22/2025-9/25/2025, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for two (2) of two (2) medication carts (Sides 1 and 2 medication carts), one (1) of one (1) medication room, and one (1) of one (1) treatment cart reviewed. Specifically, the Side 1 medication cart contained medications that were not dated when opened, and expired medications; the Side 1 and Side 2 medication carts and treatment cart were unlocked and unattended; and the medication room refrigerator was unclean and had a large buildup of ice on the back. Findings include:The facility policy Storage, Labeling of Over-the-Counter Medication, Destruction and Disposal of Medication, revised 9/3/2025, documented medications and biologicals were stored safely and securely. Medications should be labeled accordingly and missing, incomplete, improper, or incorrect containers shall be returned to the dispensing pharmacy for proper labeling before storing.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (IQIES 676829) surveys conducted 9/22/2025-9/25/2025, the facility did not ensure allegations of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment were thoroughly investigated for two (2) of four (4) residents (Residents #32 and #45) reviewed. Specifically, the facility did not complete a thorough investigation after neglect related to medication errors and did not report the incidents to the New York State Department of Health as required.Findings include: The facility policy Accident and Incident Investigation, revised 4/3/2024, documented the reporting of incidents, accidents and abuse to state and federal agencies needed to follow agency guidelines. A completed incident and accident report included the date, time and location of the accident/event or abuse allegation occurred, nature of illness or injury, circumstances surrounding the occurrence, names of witnesses and the account of the occurrence, the effected person's account of the occurrence, date and time of physician/responsible party…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0680 — isolated
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 9/22/2025-9/25/2025, the facility did not ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified person responsible for directing the development, implementation, supervision and ongoing evaluation of the activities program. Specifically, Director of Activities #9 was not qualified to direct the provision of activities to the residents. Findings include:The facility's Director of Activities Job Description undated documented the Director of Activities is responsible for planning, organizing, staffing, directing, coordinating, reporting, budgeting, and physical management of the activities department's employees and equipment to implement an on-going diversified program of activities to meet the individual resident's needs. The Director of Activities reports directly to the Administrator. Qualifications for the job include high school education or equivalent with additional training (B.A. or B.S. in Recreational Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Education or Social Service Preferred) in related areas.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 9/22/2025-9/25/2025, the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #5) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #5 had wound treatment order changes that were not implemented, did not have weekly wound follow-up as recommended, and the wounds to the right foot were not included in the comprehensive care plan. Findings include: The facility policy Skin Prevention, Assessment and Treatment, revised 5/2/2022, documented any skin impairments were assessed and documented weekly in the medical record by the wound nurse, or designee. The goal of wound treatments was to promote healing. Residents with wounds were reviewed during weekly Risk Management Committee meetings for progress and interventions and care plans were revised as appropriate. Resident #5 had diagnoses including methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection (a type of bacteria resistant to many antibiotics), Stage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 9/22/2025-9/25/2025, the facility did not ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one (1) of one (1) Resident (Resident #31) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #31 had significant weight loss and did not receive their planned nutritional supplement or a comparable substitution.Findings include:The facility policy Weight Assessment and Interventions, revised 12/30/2024, documented the dietitian assessed resident nutrition, food preferences, food allergies, frequency of meals and cultural/religious preferences on the initial and annual assessment. Nursing staff measured resident weights on admission and then weekly for four weeks. If no weight concerns, weights were measured monthly. Recommendations from the provider and/or dietitian were followed. Interventions for undesirable weight loss focused first on food (extra food, snacks, calorie-dense food). The facility policy Nutritional Snacks and Supplements, revised 12/30/2024, documented members of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews during the recertification survey and abbreviated (NY00361275) surveys the facility did not ensure residents were free of significant medications errors for two (2) of two (2) residents (Residents #32 and #45) reviewed. Specifically, Registered Nurse #16 falsely documented administering clonazepam (antianxiety medication) to Resident #32 and failed to administer multiple doses of an intravenous antibiotic to Resident #45.Findings include: The facility policy Medication Error Management, revised 5/2019, documented it is the responsibility of every employee to report any known, suspected or potential medication error. Each medication error or potential error identified will be investigated by nursing administration and current processes will be assessed for areas of improvement. 1) Resident #32 had diagnoses including generalized anxiety disorder, dementia with behavioral disturbance, and major depressive disorder. The 4/22/2024 Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident had severely impaired cognition, behavioral symptoms directed toward…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 6/10/2024 through 6/13/2024, the facility did not ensure the development and implementation of a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for 3 of 12 residents (Residents # 6, #9 and # 13) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #6 was not care planned for contractures; and Resident # 9 and Resident #13 were not cared planned for anticoagulant (drug used to prevent blood clots from forming or traveling to vital organs) therapy. Findings Include: The facility policy Comprehensive Care Plan, revised 6/25/2020 documented the facility's care planning/interdisciplinary team, in coordination with the resident, his/her family or representative (sponsor), develops and maintains a comprehensive care plan for each resident that identifies the highest level of functioning the resident may be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00312820) surveys conducted 6/10/2024-6/13/2024, the facility did not ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #22) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #22 was not assisted with shaving unwanted facial hair. Findings include: The facility policy Activities of Daily Living initiated 1/23/2024 documented residents would be provided with care and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living. Residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living independently would receive services and appropriate support with elimination, dining, mobility, and hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care). If care or services was refused, the refusal and information would be documented in the resident's clinical record. Resident #22 had diagnoses including alcohol dependence with alcohol- induced…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted from 6/10/2024-6/13/2/24, the facility did not maintain drugs and biologicals labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional standards, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 1 of 2 medication carts (Side 2) reviewed. Specifically, Side 2 medication cart had three medicated eye drops that were opened and not dated. Findings include: The undated facility policy, Medication Storage, documented that medications would be stored in a manner that maintained the integrity of the product, ensured the safety of the residents and was in accordance with Department of Health guidelines. During an observation on 6/11/2024 at 11:35 AM with Licensed Practical Nurse #12, Side 2 medication cart contained the following medications opened and undated: - erythromycin Ophthalmic Ointment 5 milligrams/gram (antibacterial) - Polyvinyl Alcohol Ophthalmic Solution 1.4% (lubricant) - Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic solution 0.25% for glaucoma (eye…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 10 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00312820) surveys conducted 6/10/2024 - 6/13/2024, the facility did not ensure each resident received food and drink that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 of 1 meal test trays reviewed (6/11/2024 lunch meal). Specifically, the lunch tray included foods that were not palatable or served at safe and appetizing temperatures. Findings include: The facility Policy and Procedure Food Temperatures policy, revised 6/27/2022, documented food stored hot would be kept at 135 degrees Fahrenheit or above. Food in refrigerators would be kept at 41 degrees Fahrenheit or below. Food would be served at palatable temperatures within those guidelines. Temperatures of food items would be checked prior to service to the residents and as frequently as necessary when being stored hot for service. During an interview on 6/10/2024 at 10:03 AM, Resident #3 stated the food served to residents did not have an appetizing taste. Hot foods served were not hot enough and the food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review during the recertification survey conducted 6/10/2024 -6/13/2024, the facility did not ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 main kitchen. Specifically, the floors under the dish machine and the walk-in cooler were unclean with food debris and there was brown liquid spilled on the walk-in cooler floor. Findings include: The 5/14/2024 dietary checklist documented daily tasks to be completed every shift included sweeping the floor, and evening tasks included sweeping and mopping the floor and walk-in cooler. A quarterly deep cleaning schedule documented areas deep cleaned for June 2024 were the dishwasher area, walk-in refrigerator, and stove hood. During an observation on 6/10/2024 at 9:44 AM in the main kitchen, the floors under the dish machine were unclean with food debris. The floors in the walk-in cooler were unclean with food debris and they had a brown liquid spilled on them. Mouse traps were observed on the dry food storage shelves.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-25 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted 5/23-5/25/22, the facility failed to assess residents for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation, review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative and obtain informed consent for 4 of 12 residents (Residents #4, 9, 24 and 35) reviewed. Specifically, - for Residents 4, 9, 24, and 35 there was no documentation bed rail assessments were completed, no documentation the risks/benefits of bed rails was explained to the resident/representative prior to their implementation, no physician orders for bed rails, and the care instructions and comprehensive care plans (CCP) did not document a plan for bed rail use. - Residents #4 and 35 did not have consent for bed rail use provided by their designated representative. Findings include: The facility policy Emergency Procedure, Seizure Management, revised 8/2018 documented: - During a seizure to remove loose items from around the resident. - If the resident had a seizure in bed to take measures to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00282267 and NY00292425) conducted 5/23/22-5/25/22, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #2). Specifically, Resident #2 was not assisted with shaving as frequently as they preferred. Findings include: The undated facility policy Activities of Daily Living, Supporting, documented residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living independently would receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Resident #2 had diagnoses including congestive heart failure, depression, and diabetes. The 5/13/22 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment documented the resident had moderately impaired cognition, required extensive assistance for bed mobility and personal hygiene, was totally dependent for transfers and locomotion, and did not reject care. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 5/23/22-5/25/22, the facility failed to ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #35) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #35 had a significant weight loss and a recommendation by the registered dietitian (RD) to increase a nutritional supplement was not implemented. Findings include: The facility policy Weight Assessment and Interventions, revised 1/19/22, documented the policy of the facility was to prevent significant unplanned or unavoidable weight loss for the residents. Recommendations from the provider or dietitian would be followed. Liquid nutritional supplements, per facility formulary, may be considered if resident caloric intake remains inadequate to stabilize or increase weight. Resident #35 had diagnoses including dementia, anemia, and hypertension. The 4/30/22 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment documented the resident had severe cognitive impairment, required supervision with setup help for eating, weighed 119 pounds…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview during the recertification survey conducted 5/23/22-5/25/22, the facility failed to ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food and drink that is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 of 1 meal test trays reviewed (5/25/22 lunch meal). Specifically, the lunch tray included foods that were not palatable or served at safe and appetizing temperatures. Findings include: The facility policy Food Temperatures revised 11/5/21 documented food stored hot will be kept at 135 Fahrenheit (F) or above. Food in refrigerators would be kept at 41 F or below. Temperatures of food items will be checked prior to service to the residents and as frequently as necessary when being stored hot for service. During an interview on 5/23/22 at 12:58 PM Resident #33 stated the facility served a lot of noodles and eggs. They had family bring them food from the outside frequently due to the poor quality of the food. Barbecued chicken was usually boiled chicken with barbecue sauce on the side. Peanut butter and jelly sandwiches…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review during the recertification survey conducted 5/23/22-5/25/22, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 main kitchen. Specifically, the floors under the dishwasher and the walk-in cooler in the main kitchen were unclean and black with food debris; the exhaust hood over the stove was dust laden and unclean with grease build up; and there was a bag of frozen raw chicken stored above fully cooked rib and sausage patties. Findings include: The facility policy Sanitation revised 11/5/19 documented all kitchens, kitchen areas, and dining areas should be kept clean, free from litter and rubbish. The Food Services Manager would be responsible for scheduling staff for cleaning of kitchen and dining areas. Food service staff would be trained to maintain cleanliness throughout their work areas during all tasks, and to clean after each task before proceeding to the next assignment. The facility policy Food Temperatures revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-25 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review during the recertification survey conducted 5/23/22-5/25/22, the facility failed to conduct regular inspections of all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment for 1 of 10 resident beds (Resident #24). Specifically, when Resident #24's bed rails were checked for possible zones of entrapment using the Bionex bed entrapment device, the rails failed for zones 1 (within the bedrail) and 2 (top of compressed mattress to bottom of bedrail, between bedrail and supports). Findings include: The facility policy, Bed and Mattress Safety dated 11/5/19 documents mattress fit would not create gaps between bed rails and other parts of the bed that may create a risk of entrapment and/or injury. Bed/side rails would be used as an enabler to assist with and promote independence with bed mobility. In an effort to prevent deaths/injuries form entrapment associated with hospital bed side rails, the Director of Nursing Service, or designee, would work with the Safety Director,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-06-13 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 6/10/2024-6/13/2024, the facility did not post the following required information on a daily basis: the current resident census and the total number and the actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift, in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors for 4 of 4 days reviewed. Specifically, the facility did not post the resident census and nurse staffing information daily, as required. Findings include: The facility did not have a policy on posting daily nurse staffing. The daily resident census and nurse staffing information was not observed in an area that was readily accessible to residents and visitors: - On 6/10/2024 at 9:30 AM. - On 6/11/2024 at 8:05 AM. - On 6/12/2024 at 9:29 AM. - On 6/13/2024 at 8:00 AM. During an interview on 6/13/2024 at 8:34 AM, Nurse Staff Scheduler/Charge Nurse #9 stated they were responsible for the nursing staff schedule. They were not aware daily staffing and census had to be posted in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2022-05-25 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted 5/23-5/25/22, the facility failed to inform each resident and/or their designated representatives of changes to services covered by Medicare and potential financial liability for services provided during a non-covered stay for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #15 and 36) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #15 and 36 had facility-initiated discharges from Medicare Part A services when benefit days were not exhausted, remained in the facility, and were not provided with the SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility) ABN (Advanced Beneficiary Notice), Form CMS (Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services)-10055 as required. Findings include: The facility policy Notice of Non-Coverage dated 7/1/21 documented it was the policy of the facility to give notice of non-coverage to beneficiaries according to federal guidelines. When the facility believed the resident's stay would not be paid for under Medicare, the facility gave notice 48 hours prior to ending services to the resident/Power of Attorney (POA) explaining why and when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to STERN CONSULTANTS — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.8-1.8 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
SHEPS, BORUCHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2019
STROM, ROCHELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2019

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-20.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$360K
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 75%Medicare 10%Other / private 14%

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $360K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$309per resident / day
operating cost
$9,388per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$256per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New York
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,110/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335077. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next