Robinson Rehab And Nursing

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 89 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 57.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 67 beds and averages 62.5 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to provide supervision and implement effective interventions to prevent falls for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for falls in the sample of 12. This failure resulted in R1 sustaining a fall that caused a fracture of left knee and large hematoma of scalp and a right parietal subarachnoid hemorrhage. This past non-compliance occurred on from [DATE] to [DATE].Findings Include:R1's face sheet documents an original admission date of [DATE]. R1 has diagnoses in her electronic health record including, but not limited to dementia, dorsalgia, history of falling, abnormalities of gait and mobility, unsteadiness on feet, muscle weakness, and difficulty in walking.R1's non-medication related physician orders include but are not limited to order dated [DATE] for monitoring and prevention of adverse effects of opioid medications including, but not limited to falls, disorientation, dizziness, vertigo, and lightheadedness.R1's most recent minimum data set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to respond to residents' requests for assistance in a timely manner to promote dignity and respect for 1 (R1) of 4 residents reviewed for call light response in the sample of 4. This failure resulted in R1 having to urinate on herself, causing her feelings of discomfort, anxiety, humiliation, and embarrassment.Findings Include: R1's admission Record documented an admission date of 4/27/25 and included diagnoses of morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, spinal stenosis, need for assistance with personal care, presence of right artificial hip joint, pain in right hip, presence of artificial knee joint, bilateral, essential tremor, anxiety, and muscle weakness. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating R1 is cognitively intact. This MDS also documents under Functional Abilities and Goals, R1 is dependent for toileting hygiene, shower/bathe self, upper body…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement progressive person centered interventions for fall prevention for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for falls in the sample of 3. This failure resulted in R1 experiencing 4 falls between 2/20/24 and 3/3/24 which required emergency room evaluation and/or treatment for injuries that included skin tears to right arm, a right orbital fracture, head lacerations, and baseball size hematoma to the head. Findings Include: R1's admission Record documented an initial admission date to the facility as 9/22/23. R1 is documented on this same record as being [AGE] years old with diagnoses including but not limited to: Unspecified Dementia, unspecified severity, with agitation; Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; Major Depressive Disorder; Insomnia; Muscle Weakness; and Cognitive Communication Deficit. V9 (Physician) is documented as being R1's Primary Care Physician. R1 was observed as being alert to person only during this survey. Review of R1's Progress…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide increased staff supervision in order to protect a resident from resident-to-resident abuse for one (R2) of three residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of three. This failure resulted in R1 threatening, hitting and throwing water on R2, and with R2, upon staff directives, curtailing his normal activities to try to avoid R1.Findings include:R2's admission Record documented an admission Date of 12/14/25 and listed Diagnoses including Diabetes Type 2 and Depression. A Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented that R2 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of a 12, indicating R2 had moderately impaired cognition.R2's Care Plan dated 5/24/26 documented a problem area, I prefer to help with small chores. I helped my mother and sister for several years. I like to help to give myself a purpose, with a corresponding intervention, I understand that I am only to assist my mom (who is a resident) by pushing her wheelchair and not other…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report resident-to-resident physical abuse to local law enforcement for one resident (R2) of three residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of three. Findings include:An IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) Long Term Care Serious Injury Incident and Communicable Disease Report dated 5/24/26 documented, Incident date: 5/24/26 at 7:00pm. Location: Common/Dining area. Detailed incident summary: (R1) and (R2) were in the dining/common area of the facility. (R1) was in his wheelchair and (R2) attempted to 'move' him a little. (R1) swung at (R2) and struck (R2) open handed on the jaw. Staff witnessed the incident and immediately de escalated and separated the two residents. Nursing staff completed an injury assessment on both individuals, there were no visible or serious injuries or trauma noted. No further incident occurred. Immediate interventions and safety actions: 1. Individuals were immediately separated. 2. Staff remained with both residents to ensure de escalation. 3. Residents had increased monitoring to ensure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify and thoroughly investigate allegations of resident-to-resident abuse and failed to ensure residents were not at risk for further abuse for one resident (R2) of three residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of three. Findings include:R2's admission Record documented an admission Date of 12/14/25 and listed Diagnoses including Diabetes Type 2 and Depression. A Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented that R2 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of a 12, indication R2 had moderately impaired cognition. R2's Care Plan dated 5/24/26 documented a problem area, I prefer to help with small chores. I helped my mother and sister for several years. I like to help to give myself a purpose, with a corresponding intervention, I understand that I am only to assist my mom (who is a resident) by pushing her wheelchair and not other residents in this facility, and problem area, I currently have an alteration to my ability to care for self…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-11-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the dish machine and 3 compartment sink were effectively sanitizing the dishes and stationary equipment. This has the potential to affect all 59 residents residing in the facility.The Findings Include: During the initial tour of the kitchen on 11/18/25 at 9:45am, V4 (Cook) measured the sanitizer levels of dish machine with a quaternary sanitizer test strip. The strip measured 0 part per million (ppm). V4 then retrieved chlorine test strips and tested the dish machine again with a 0 ppm reading. A bucket of sanitizer was then tested with the quaternary test strip and a 0 ppm reading was obtained. A dishwasher Temperature Log and Temp/Chemical Sanitizing Machine dated November 2025 was provided and was filled out through the current day 11/18/2025. The log documented that the sanitizer level for the dish machine should be 50 ppm chlorine. This log documented that the sanitizer level was checked for the breakfast shift and V4 (Cook) stated that she was the employee to fill out the log for the breakfast…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow policy and procedure for infection control practices for 4 of 16 residents (R13, R54, R57, and R59) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 35. The Findings Include:1. R54's admission Record documented an Initial admission Date of 11/12/2024. R54's admission Record documents the following diagnoses: Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, polyosteoarthritis, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, pain in right knee, major depressive disorder, hypotension, and acute kidney failure. R54's Order Summary Report dated 11/20/2025 documented an order for suprapubic catheter change monthly on the 7th - urologist to change. The order summary goes on to document an order for infection precautions - enhanced barrier - staff will wear gown and gloves when in direct resident contact.R57's admission Record documented an Initial admission Date of 10/23/2025. R57's admission Record documents the following diagnoses: unspecified fracture of third lumbar vertebra,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-09-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff were scheduled/available to provide timely care to meet residents' needs. This failure has the potential to affect all 60 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include:1. R1's admission Record documented an admission date of 4/27/25 and included diagnoses of morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, spinal stenosis, need for assistance with personal care, presence of right artificial hip joint, pain in right hip, presence of artificial knee joint, bilateral, essential tremor, anxiety, and muscle weakness. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating R1 is cognitively intact. This MDS also documented under Functional Goals and Abilities R1 is dependent for toileting hygiene, shower/bathe self, upper body dressing, and putting on/taking off footwear.R1's current Care Plan included a focus area of I currently have an alteration to my…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain air conditioning equipment and provide comfortable temperatures for 21 of 21 residents (R1-R21) reviewed for environment in the sample of 21. Findings Include: On 06/27/2025 at 11:30 A.M. while entering the building fans were observed in resident rooms, and lights were off in the dining room. On 06/27/2025 at 11:56 A.M. V1 (Administrator) stated that there was a recent problem with the air, but it was fixed yesterday 06/26/2025. On 06/27/2025 at 1:12 P.M. V3 (Agency Registered Nurse) stated that it is cooler in the facility. V3 stated that it was hot in the building but not unbearable. V3 stated there were fans in the hallway blowing air. V3 stated she is not aware of any residents that had heat related issues. On 06/27/2025 at 1:20 P.M. R3 stated that it has been miserable with the temperatures in the building. R3 stated she has two fans and is uncomfortable, but she was sure that everyone else is too. R3 stated that she did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-16 · tag F0638 — pattern
  Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure quarterly assessments were completed within the required time frames for nine (R13, R16, R25, R27, R47, R48, R49, R52 and R54) of nine residents reviewed for quarterly assessments in a sample of 35. The Findings Include: R13's Face Sheet documented an admission date of 1/13/23. R13's most recent completed and submitted quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Section A documented an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/27/24. The next quarterly MDS Section A was initiated with an ARD of 7/28/24 but had not been completed or submitted as of the date of this review on 08/16/24. This indicates more than 92 days between completion of assessments and shows R13's quarterly assessment had not been completed/submitted within 14 days after the ARD of 7/28/24. R16's Face Sheet documented an admission date of 10/12/22. R16's most recent completed and submitted quarterly MDS Section A documented an ARD of 4/16/24. The next quarterly MDS Section A was initiated with an ARD of 7/5/24 but had not been completed or submitted as of the date…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure comprehensive assessments were completed in accordance with required time frames for two (R12, R44) of two residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments and timing in the sample of 35. The Findings Include: R12's Face Sheet documented an admission date of 7/29/22. R12's previous Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment documented an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/4/23. R12's most recent completed and submitted Quarterly MDS assessment, Section A documented an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/7/24. R12's current Comprehensive MDS assessment Section A documented it had been initiated with an ARD of 7/2/24 but documents no completion date as of the date of this review on 08/16/24. This indicates more than 92 days between quarterly completion of assessments, more than 366 days between completion of comprehensive assessments, and shows R12's comprehensive assessment had not been completed/submitted within 14 days after the ARD of 7/2/24. R44's Face Sheet documented an admission date of 8/30/22. R44's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
  Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide therapeutic diets as ordered for 1 (R47) of 2 residents reviewed for dietary supplements in the sample of 35. Findings Include: R47's Face Sheet documented an admission date of 11/13/23 and included the following diagnoses of unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase. R47's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. This same MDS documents under section I Active Diagnoses, a diagnosis of I5600 Malnutrition (protein, calorie) risk of malnutrition. R47's Physician Order Summary dated 5/13/2024 documented high protein pudding. On 8/13/2024 at 12:05 PM, R47 was sitting with V9 (Speech Language Pathologist/SLP) being served a regular mechanical diet of ground pulled pork with gravy, creamed corn, baked beans-no bacon, soft chopped fruit, and cornbread/margarine. R47's meal tray did not include high protein…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,015 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,015 — penalty dated 2025-09-03

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to STERN CONSULTANTS — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 41 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL