Ayer Valley Rehab And Nursing
400 Groton Road, Ayer, MA 01432 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 123 certified beds · (978) 772-1704 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2023
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 5 actual-harm citations
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (78) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $63,034 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-05)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 38% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.8% | 16.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.5% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.0% | 1.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 42.5% | 15.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.5% | 3.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.4% | 15.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 22.9% | 19.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.3% | 94.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.0% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 34.1% | 21.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.9% | 21.4% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 51.8% | 77.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 31.5% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.7% | 11.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.09 | 1.88 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.61 | 1.50 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
55.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 113 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 28.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 42 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 55.5%CMS range 47.7–64.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.4%CMS range 6.7–12.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 28.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 23.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 28.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 93.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 96.8% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.2%CMS range 3.2–10.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.91 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 123 beds and averages 101.4 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.85 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.85 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
78 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 62 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to notify the Physician/Non Physician Practitioner (NPP: Nurse Practitioner) of changes in condition related to a pressure wound for one Resident (#60) out of a total sample of 26 residents, who was identified to be at risk for skin breakdown. Specifically, the facility staff failed to notify the Physician/NPP when: 1. The Resident developed a pressure injury (PI: localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence presenting as intact skin) on his/her left hip on 2/6/24. 2. The Resident's pressure injury deteriorated to a pressure ulcer (PU: open ulcer, the appearance of which occurs as a result of intense and/or prolonged pressure or pressure in combination with shear) on 2/19/24. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Skin Prevention, Assessment and Treatment, dated 5/2/22, indicated the following: -The purpose included to promote a systematic approach and monitoring process for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record and policy review, and interview, the facility failed to provide necessary pressure ulcer (PU: localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence) treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing for one Resident (#60), out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to: 1. Adequately assess Resident #60's change in skin condition when the Resident was identified to have a PU on his/her left hip. 2. Consult with the Physician/Non Physician Practitioner (NPP: Nurse Practitioner [NP]) when the Resident was identified to have a PU on his/her left hip, and obtain treatment orders from the Physician/NPP for Resident #60's left hip PU, to prevent further deterioration of the PU. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Skin Prevention, Assessment and Treatment, dated 5/2/22, indicated the following: -The purpose included to promote a systematic approach and monitoring process for the care of residents with existing wounds and for those who are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-09-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed, review of facility surveillance camera video footage, and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for care, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was free from abuse from a staff member. Review of the surveillance camera video footage from 08/24/23 during the evening shift, showed Resident #1 pick up a cup containing yellow-tinted liquid off a medication cart, put it up to his/her mouth, Nurse #1 quickly goes over to him/her, grabs the cup of liquid from Resident #1's hand and throws the liquid into Resident #1's face, and Nurse #1 also engaged in a verbal altercation with him/her, the incident was witnessed by another staff member who stepped into intervened. Resident #1 was visibly upset after the incident, was crying, and was cleaned up and comforted by staff. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy titled, Abuse Prohibition, dated as revised 10/24/22, indicated the following: -the Centers (Facilities) prohibit abuse, mistreatment, neglect, misappropriation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-06-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff notified the physician of: (1) A change in the treatment plan, specifically a missed hemodialysis (procedure used to remove waste and fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working) visit, for one Resident (#205) out of one applicable sampled resident, and (2) A change in condition, specifically a new pressure ulcer, for one Resident (#88) out of three applicable sampled residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #205 was admitted to the facility in June 2022 with the following diagnoses: acute on chronic congestive heart failure (heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), acute pulmonary edema (excess fluid in the lungs), acute kidney failure (kidneys lose the ability to remove waste), and dependence on renal (kidney) dialysis. Review of a physician's progress note, dated 6/14/22, indicated the Resident requested to see the physician due to increased edema (swelling) over the legs and face, and also some shortness of breath. The assessment plan included documentation to continue with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-06-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services for two Residents (#88 and #69) out of a total sample of 23 residents, by failing to obtain and implement physician's orders and provide appropriate assessment of existing wounds. Findings include: Review of the facility policy for Skin Integrity Management, revised 6/1/21, indicated the following: -Perform skin inspection on admission/re-admission and weekly. Document on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) or in the electronic health record (EHR). -Implement special wound care treatment/techniques as ordered -Notify physician to obtain orders -Perform wound observations and measurements upon initial identification of altered skin integrity, weekly and with anticipated decline of wound. 1. Resident #88 was admitted to the facility in May, 2022. For Resident #88 a wound, observed upon readmission from the hospital, on his/her heel progressed from a Stage II pressure injury (sore that has broken through the top layer of skin and part of the layer below, and may appear…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2022-06-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided dialysis services; specifically, failed to (1) provide transportation to a dialysis treatment appointment, (2) obtain post dialysis weight from dialysis center, (3) monitor hemodialysis catheter site, and (4) obtain physician's order for dialysis treatments for one Resident (#205) out of one applicable sampled resident. Findings include: Resident #205 was admitted to the facility in June 2022 with the following diagnoses: acute on chronic congestive heart failure (heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), acute pulmonary edema (excess fluid in the lungs), acute kidney failure (kidneys lose the ability to remove waste), and dependence on renal (kidney) dialysis. 1. Review of a physician's progress note, dated 6/14/22, indicated the Resident requested to see the physician due to increased edema (swelling) over the legs and face, and also some shortness of breath. The assessment/plan included to continue with hemodialysis three days a week. Further review indicated the Resident had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-06-25 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespreadHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, records reviewed, and interviews, the facility which is licensed for a total of 123 beds, and admits residents with psychosocial care needs associated with, but are not limited to, mental illness, substance use disorder and behavioral issues, failed to ensure that they employed a full-time qualified Social Worker (SW), from 5/28/26 after terminating their SW, up to and including the dates of survey, to adequately meet and provide the necessary and appropriate services for each residents individual psychosocial care needs. therefore, placing their current resident census of 99 residents, at risk for unmet psychosocial care needs due to the lack of having a qualified SW in place, as required.Findings include:Review of the Facility Policy Titled Social Services-Behavioral Health Services- Including Substance Abuse, dated as revised 02/05/25, indicated all residents receive the necessary behavioral health care and services, including substance abuse services, to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychological well-being, in accordance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Resident #12 was admitted to the facility in May 2022 with diagnoses including Dementia and COPD. Review of Resident #12's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated: -the Resident was moderately cognitively impaired as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 out of 15. -the Resident had received oxygen therapy. Review of the Resident's comprehensive medical record indicated: -No Physician's orders for oxygen administration or oxygen and respiratory equipment maintenance. -Physician's orders to keep the head of the bed elevated at 30 degrees as needed for shortness of breath. -a Care Plan indicating that the Resident was at risk for respiratory complications related to COPD. -a Care Plan intervention to observe the Resident's respiratory status and assess for changes. -a discontinue date of 2/19/25 for oxygen at 2 L (liters) via nasal cannula documented on the February 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR ) -a Nurse's Progress Note dated 2/19/25 indicating the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-13 · tag F0712 — patternEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide Physician visits at the required frequency for five Residents (#10, #28, #45, #51 and #68) for an applicable sample of six residents, out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide alternating routine 60-day visits between the Physician and the Nurse Practitioner (NP) for Resident's #10, # 28, #45, #51 and #68, as required. Findings include: 1. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility in September 2022 with diagnoses including Dementia. Review of Resident #10's clinical record indicated that the Resident was seen by a Physician on 6/30/24. Further review of the clinical record indicated that Resident #10 was not seen again by the Physician until 10/20/24 (112 days after the previous Physician visit). 2. Resident #28 was admitted to the facility in March 2024 with diagnoses including Dementia. Review of Resident #28's clinical record indicated that the Resident was seen by a Physician on 4/20/24. Further review of the clinical record indicated that Resident #28 was not seen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-13 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that recommendations made by the Consultant Pharmacist during a monthly Medication Regimen Review (MRR) were reviewed by the Physician as required for two Residents (#9 and #11), out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #11, act upon the Consultant Pharmacist recommendation dated 11/27/23, to monitor serum Dilantin levels routinely every six months, putting the Resident at risk for elevated serum Dilantin levels and resulting in hospitalization to manage Dilantin toxicity. 2. For Resident #9, act upon the Consultant Pharmacist recommendations dated 10/16/24 and 12/15/24, to update the Physician's order for Breztri (combination inhaler consisting of inhaled steroid, anticholinergic and long acting beta adrenergic agonist medications) to instruct the Resident to rinse mouth after use to prevent the development of oral thrush (Candida Albicans) from inhaled steroid use. Findings include: Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the Physician of a change in condition for one Resident (#114) for a sample of three closed resident records reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to notify Resident #114's Physician of the Resident's change in condition when the Resident died in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's Change in Condition Policy, dated [DATE] and revised [DATE], indicated the following: >Full assessment by nursing staff includes but is not limited to: -Full vitals (temperature, respirations, blood pressure and oxygen saturation level). -Level of consciousness. -Respiratory status . >Notify Physician of change and give assessment information. -Receive orders, if any. -If not during normal business hours for provider, place call to provider to update on resident's condition . if there is a significant change. -If unable to reach provider, contact Medical Director or Medical Director Associate. Review of the facility's Death of a Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to resolve a grievance timely for one Resident (#66), out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, for Resident #66, the facility failed to ensure that a reported grievance by the Resident, the Resident's Representative (RR), and the Nurse Practitioner (NP), regarding two missing hearing aids was documented and the grievance process initiated to resolve the concern within a reasonable timeframe. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Resident and Family Concerns and Grievances, revised 10/5/24, indicated: -Residents or their family members, guardian, or representative may voice a grievance to the facility staff in person, by telephone, or via written communication. -The facility shall provide a grievance report form to facilitate the voicing of a grievance if requested by a resident or family members. -The facility will follow up with the resident or their family members, guardian, or representative within 72 hours of the filing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#27) out of a total sample of 23 residents, who required a vascular access device (device that provides access to the veins for the delivery of medications or fluids). Specifically, the facility failed to obtain Physician orders for the care and maintenance of Resident #27's midline catheter (a flexible tube inserted through a peripheral vein above the elbow that ends just below the axilla [armpit]) and monitor for catheter related complications. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Infusion Therapy Clinical and Pharmacy Services Policies and Procedures for Long-Term Care last revised November 2022, indicated the following: -for midline catheters flush before and after medication administration with a 10 ml (milliliter) barrel syringe with preservative free 0.9% sodium chloride. -change the catheter dressing at least every seven days and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive Trauma Informed Care Plan for one Resident (#2), out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, for Resident #2, the facility failed to complete an assessment and ensure that a comprehensive Trauma Informed Care Plan was developed relative to the Resident's history of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Findings include: Review of the facility policy for Trauma Centered Care last revised 11/5/24 indicated: -the initial (admission) intake, assessment, and documentation process includes questions designed to sensitively and respectfully explore prior (including early childhood) and current trauma-related experiences. -the screening and assessment process is sufficiently thorough and focused on trauma-related issues to allow for determination of a diagnosis associated with trauma, such as PTSD. -the facility routinely assists residents to develop a plan that is designed to prevent and manage a crisis. All staff directly involved in the residents' treatment is informed about the resident plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that three Licensed Nurses (Nurse #3, ADON [Assistant Director of Nurses] and SDC [Staff Development Coordinator]) out of three Nurses, had the specific competencies and skills sets necessary to provide respiratory care and services that were consistent with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#66), out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, for Resident #66, the facility failed to ensure that Nurse #3, the ADON and the SDC had the knowledge, competency and skills necessary to: -order and provide an inline adaptor for the Resident's Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP - type of non-invasive device that administers a predetermined level of pressure through a mask worn over the nose and/or mouth to keep the airways open) machine to connect oxygen as ordered for CPAP therapy -obtain and implement appropriate CPAP pressure settings as required when the settings were not ordered, resulting in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete a performance review at least once every 12 months for one Certified Nurses Aide (CNA) #2 out of a sample of five CNAs reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that a performance review was completed as required, for CNA #2 when CNA #2 had been employed at the facility for greater than 12 months. Findings include: Review of the facility's Performance Appraisal Policy, dated 11/1/15 and revised 11/5/24, indicated the following: -It is the facility policy that employees receive annual performance appraisals. -Annual reviews assist supervisors in appraising employees of progress and potential as well as areas that need to be strengthened. -Department Directors should review the evaluation with the employee and confirm performance goals for the next year. -Performance evaluations are to be reviewed by the Human Resource Director and . filed in the employee's personnel file. Review of the facility's list of CNAs employed at the facility for greater than one year as of 3/7/25, indicated that CNA #2 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 62 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#104) out of a total sample of 23 residents, was free from a significant medication error when an anticoagulation medication was not administered and monitoring laboratory testing of the medication was not completed as ordered by the Physician. Specifically, for Resident #104, the facility failed to ensure that Warfarin Sodium (a blood thinner or anticoagulant medication used to prevent blood clots and reduce risk of heart attack and stroke) was administered to the Resident as ordered and that Prothrombin Time/International Normalized Ratio Lab work (PT/INR - blood test that measures how quickly the blood clots, helping to assess the function of blood clotting factors and monitor the effectiveness of blood thinning medications like Warfarin Sodium) laboratory test was drawn as ordered by the Physician, increasing the risk for heart complications and formation of blood clots. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Administering Medication, initiated 11/1/15 and revised 3/19/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food and drink at a safe and appetizing temperature to residents on the North One Unit and for two Residents (#77 and #76) residing on the South Two Unit. Specifically, facility failed to: -Provide residents on the North One Unit with hot food, at a safe an appetizing temperature, when the food was meant to be hot. -Provide Resident #77 and Resident #76 with hot food and cold drinks at safe and appetizing temperatures, when the food was meant to be hot, and the drinks were meant to be cold. Findings include: Review of the facility's Food Quality and Palatability Policy, dated May 2014 and revised September 2017, indicated the following: -Food will be prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance. -Food will be palatable, attractive, and served at a safe and appetizing temperature. Review of the facility's Meal Distribution Policy, dated May 2014 and revised September 2017, indicated: -Meals are transported to the dining locations in a manner that ensures proper temperature…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was designed to meet the individual needs of one Resident (#10) out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #10 was provided with the Physician's prescribed diet consistency of Nectar/Mildly thickened liquids (diet in which a thickening agent is added to thin liquids making them safer for a resident to swallow) when the Resident was at risk for aspiration and was offered thin consistency liquids with a breakfast meal. Findings include: Review of the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI), last updated July 2019, indicated: - nectar-thick liquids, also known as mildly thick, are easily pourable, flows from a spoon more slowly than water, and have a consistency similar to fruit nectar or thick cream soup. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility in March 2023 with diagnoses including Dementia and Dysphagia, oropharyngeal Phase. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that specialized rehabilitation services were provided to one Resident (#51) out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, for Resident #51, the facility failed to ensure that a speech and language therapy evaluation was completed timely, when it was identified that the Resident had an unintended weight loss. Findings include: Resident #51 was admitted to the facility in March 2018 with diagnoses including Dementia. Review of the facility policy titled Rehabilitation Services in Skilled Nursing Facility, dated 1/31/25 indicated: -rehabilitation services, including physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech-language therapy, will be delivered by licensed and qualified staff in accordance with best practices, resident-centered care and regulatory guidelines. -rehabilitation services will be provided based on the established care plan. -regular communication will occur between the rehabilitation team, nursing staff and attending…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records relative to the application of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP - type of non-invasive device that administers a predetermined level of pressure through a mask worn over the nose and/or mouth to keep the airways open) for one Resident (#66) out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility staff documented that CPAP therapy was being applied to Resident #66 at hours of sleep when the Resident was not being provided the CPAP treatment nightly as ordered. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Charting and Documentation, revised 11/5/24, indicated: -To maintain a medical record to serve as a legal document that details the services provided to the resident, an any changes in the resident's medical or mental condition, through charting and documentation. -An electronic treatment administration record shall be maintained which records resident care procedures and/or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adhere to infection control standards of practice for two Residents (#44 and #75) out of a total sample of 23 residents, increasing the risk of contamination and the spread of infection to other residents within the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #44, ensure that staff appropriately followed Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP's: the use of protective gowns and gloves during high contact care activities that may provide opportunity for transmission of medication resistant organisms through staff hands and/or clothing), while providing high contact care for an indwelling urinary catheter. 2. For Resident #75, ensure that Nurse #3 used the appropriate PPE during medication administration procedure via the Resident's gastrostomy tube (g-tube -tube inserted through the abdominal wall into the stomach). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Policy and Procedure Enhanced Barrier Precautions, initiated 3/27/24 and revised 10/28/24, indicated the following: -It is this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to offer pneumococcal immunizations in accordance with Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance to one Resident (#28) of five applicable residents, out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to offer an up-to-date Pneumococcal Vaccine to Resident #28 when Resident #28's pneumococcal immunization was not up to date, and administration of the Pneumococcal Vaccine was not documented as clinically contraindicated for the Resident. Findings include: Review of the facility's Pneumococcal Vaccination Policy, dated 11/1/15 and revised 10/28/24, indicated the following: -It is the policy of this facility to reduce the overall incidence of pneumococcal pneumonia by immunizing high-risk persons in accordance with CDC guidance. -All admitted residents will be offered the pneumococcal vaccine in line with CDC recommendations . -Prior to administering the pneumococcal vaccine, each resident or the resident's legal representative shall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to offer updated COVID-19 immunizations for three Residents (#45, #51, and #10) of five applicable residents, out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide evidence that the 2024-2025 COVID-19 immunization was offered to Residents #45, #51, and #10 when the Residents were not up to date with their COVID-19 immunizations and the immunizations were not documented as contraindicated for the Residents increasing the Residents' risk for acquiring COVID-19 associated illness. Findings include: Review of the facility's COVID-19 Vaccination Policy, dated 10/16/23 and revised 10/28/24, indicated the following: -It is the policy of this facility to have an infection control program that addresses a need to reduce the overall incidence of COVID-19 by offering to immunize all . residents. -All residents . are to be offered the COVID-19 vaccine unless the immunization is medically contraindicated, or the resident has already been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for three of three sampled residents (Resident #1, #2, and #3), the facility failed to ensure nursing notified the Physician, per facility policy, when all three of these residents sustained a weight loss of greater than 5 pounds, and their physicians were not made aware. Findings include: Review of the Facility's policy, titled Weight Assessment and Interventions, revised 11/19/24, indicated the following: -Any weight change of 5 pounds or more will be retaken for confirmation. If the weight is verified, nursing will notify the Provider [Physician or designee]. 1) Resident #3 was admitted to the facility in February 2024, diagnoses included hypertension and chronic edema (swelling) of both lower legs. Review of Resident #3's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the month of December 2024 indicated his/her physician's order for weight was as follows: -Obtain weight via hoyer lift (mechanical lift used for transfers) every Monday, Wednesday, Friday and notify the Physician [of weight changes] greater than 3 pounds (lbs.) in three days…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #3), the Facility failed to ensure nursing services provided met professional standards of quality related to obtaining a Physician's Order, when on 12/30/24, a nurse wrote a verbal order to decrease the frequency of Resident #3's weight monitoring without speaking to and obtaining an Order from the Physician/Provider, as required. Findings include: Standard Reference: Standard of Practice Reference: Pursuant to Massachusetts General Law (M.G.L), chapter 112, individuals are given the designation of registered nurse and practical nurse which includes the responsibility to provide nursing care. Pursuant to the Code of Massachusetts Regulation (CMR) 244, Rules and Regulations 3.02 and 3.04 define the responsibilities and functions of a registered nurse and practical nurse respectively. The regulations stipulate that both the registered nurse and practical nurse bear full responsibility for systematically assessing health status and recording the related health data. They also stipulate that both the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviewed and interviews, for three of three sampled residents (Resident #1, #2 and #3), who were assessed by nursing to be at risk for altered nutritional status which included the potential for weight loss, the Facility failed to ensure 1) Resident #3 was assessed and monitored by a Registered Dietician in the presence of an on-going significant weight loss and 2) Resident #1 and Resident #2 were adequately assessed and monitored by a Registered Dietician, and nutritional interventions were put in place in a timely manner, following previously identified significant weight loss, in an effort to help them maintain acceptable parameters of nutrition to prevent unplanned/undesired weight loss. Findings Include: The Facility Policy titled Weight Assessment and Interventions, dated as revised 11/19/24, indicated: -It is the policy of this facility to prevent significant unplanned or unavoidable weight loss for our residents. -The nursing staff will measure resident weights on admission. Weights will be monitored monthly unless otherwise directed. -Any weight change of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-05 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and records reviewed, for one of three nursing units (North 2), the Facility failed to ensure they provided and maintained a sufficient number of Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) so that 1) that each resident's individual care needs were provided in a timely manner and as needed, and 2) so that each resident received their meal while food items were still palatable. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 02/26/24, indicated the Facility was licensed for 123 beds and there were 41 beds on the North 2 Unit. The Assessment indicated the Facility required the following for Full Time Employees (FTE): -Certified Nurse Aides (CNA)- 29 -Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)- 19 -Registered Nurse (RN)- 8 Review of the Nursing Staff List indicated the Facility employed 11 FTE CNAs (18 less than the Facility Assessment indicated) and four FTE RNs (4 less than the Facility Assessment indicated). During an interview on 06/05/24 at 2:26 P.M., the Schedule Coordinator said the staffing goals on the secured North 2 Unit were as follows: -7:00 A.M. through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-05 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, the Facility failed to ensure they implemented their Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan of action to monitor, assess, and document the data related to staffing to identify if improvements were made. Findings include: Review of the Facility's policy, Quality Assurance Plan, with a revision date of 11/05/19, indicated the Facility would develop, implement and maintain an ongoing program designed to monitor and evaluate the quality of resident care, pursue methods to improve quality care, and to resolve identified problems. Review of the Statement of Deficiencies, dated 03/05/24, indicated the Department of Public Health cited the Facility for F725 during the survey completed on 03/05/24, and the Facility's Plan of Correction, with an alleged compliance date of 03/25/24, indicated the following: -The Director of Nurses (DON) educated staff that meal tray service must be performed upon receipt of the meal carts from the kitchen to ensure food remained at the appropriate temperature. -The DON would audit staff to resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and records reviewed, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #3) who's comprehensive care plan indicated he/she required the use of a Hoyer lift (mechanical mobility aid that supports a person's body weight to allow movement from one surface to another) with assistance of two staff members for all transfers, the Facility failed to ensure staff consistently implemented and followed interventions in his/her care plan, when on 06/05/24, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #3 transferred Resident #3 from his/her bed into the wheelchair with a Hoyer lift, without another staff member present to provide assistance. Findings include: Review of the Facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plan, with a revision date of 06/25/20, indicated an individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs is developed for each resident. Resident #3 was admitted to the Facility in January 2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-05 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's Licensed Nurse staff schedule and interviews, the facility failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. Specifically, facility staff failed to provide at least eight consecutive hours of RN services in the facility over one 24-hour period, when no nurse staffing waivers were in place. Findings include: Review of the as worked Nursing Staff Schedule provided by the facility, dated 2/19/24, included no evidence an RN worked at the facility on 2/19/24. During an interview on 2/27/24 at 8:52 A.M., the Administrator said the facility had no nurse staffing waivers in place. During an interview on 2/28/24 at 10:39 A.M., the Regional Nurse said an RN was scheduled to work the evening (3:00 P.M. through 11:00 P.M.) shift on 2/19/24, but he/she called out ill. The Regional Nurse said if this happens and there is no other RN scheduled, facility staff were supposed to alert the Director of Nurses (DON) so that another RN's services could be obtained. The Regional Nurse said this did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to implement an infection control and prevention program to provide a sanitary environment and help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases. Specifically, the facility failed to implement a water management program to minimize the risk of Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens. Findings Include: Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) QSO-17-30 memo titled, Requirement to Reduce Legionella Risk in Healthcare Facility Water Systems to Prevent Cases and Outbreaks of Legionnaire's Disease (LD), last revised 7/6/18, indicated the following Facility Requirements to Prevent Legionella Infections: -Facilities must develop and adhere to policies and procedures that inhibit microbial growth in building water systems that reduce the risk of growth and spread of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens in water. -This policy memorandum applies to Hospitals, Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs) and Long-Term Care (LTC). -Specifies testing protocols and acceptable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-05 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure timely completion as required of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments for 14 Residents (#93, #15, #56, #70, #73, #32, #55, #5, #47, #35, #94, #67, #7, and #64) out of 14 applicable residents, out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to ensure that the components of the Quarterly and Annual MDS Assessments were completed within the required timeframes. Findings include: Review of the CMS Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 1.18.11 Manual dated October 2023, included the following: -Assessment Reference Date (ARD) refers to the specific endpoint for the observation (or look-back) periods in the MDS assessment process. -The facility is required to set the ARD on the MDS Item Set or in the facility software within the required timeframe of the assessment type being completed. -The Quarterly MDS Assessment completion date must be no later than 14 days after the ARD. -The Annual MDS assessment completion date must be no later than 14 days after the ARD. 1. Resident #93 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Resident #47 was admitted to the facility in December 2017 with a diagnosis of Dementia. Review of Resident #47's Health Care Proxy (HCP) Invocation Form, dated 12/21/17, indicated the Resident's HCP was invoked on 12/21/17 due to Dementia. Review of Resident #47's clinical record indicated Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 1/25/24, had been completed. Further review of the clinical record indicated no evidence that Resident #47's care plan was reviewed and revised to the extent practicable, with participation of the Resident's HCP after the MDS Assessment was completed. 4. Resident #54 was admitted to the facility in April 2019 with a diagnosis of Dementia. Review of Resident #54's HCP Invocation Form, dated 4/30/19, indicated the Resident's HCP was invoked on 4/30/19 due to Dementia. Review of Resident #54's clinical record indicated an MDS Assessment, dated 11/23/23, had been completed. Further review of the clinical record indicated no evidence that Resident #54's care plan was reviewed and revised…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an environment that is free of accidents and hazards for one Resident (#59) out of a total sample of 26 residents, for one of two elevators used by residents, staff, and visitors and one Unit kitchenette. Specifically, the facility staff failed to: 1. Ensure that a damaged baseboard heating element in an elevator used by residents, staff, and visitors was maintained in safe working condition. 2. For Resident #59, ensure potentially hazardous smoking materials were stored in a secured area. 3. Ensure that instructions for re-heating resident foods in the kitchenette microwave and a thermometer for checking food and beverage temperatures were available to decrease the risk of accidental burns. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 2/27/24 at 12:06 P.M., the surveyor observed a baseboard heater in the elevator which connected the main lobby area to the second floor of the facility. The heater cover was observed to be scuffed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-05 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to coordinate and carry out resident care required on the North Two Unit. Specifically, the facility staff failed to ensure that: 1. Sufficient staffing levels to conduct the Unit breakfast meal pass timely for three consecutive days during the survey period and assist one Resident (#24) with his/her breakfast meal in a timely manner. 2. Sufficient staffing levels to provide showers for two Residents (#36 and #86) who required assistance to shower and the appropriate number of Certified Nurses Aides (CNA) to work the evening shift and provide the required care and services to the Residents Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 2/26/24, indicated the facility must have sufficient nursing staff . to provide nursing . services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by: -Resident assessments and individual plans of care; and, -considering the number, acuity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food and drink that was palatable, at a safe and appetizing temperature to residents on the North Two Unit. Specifically, facility staff failed to provide residents on the North Two Unit with hot food, that required to be served hot, and cold drinks that were required to be served cold. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Food Preparation, dated September 2017, indicated: -All foods would be held at appropriate temperatures greater than 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) . for hot holding, and less than 41 degrees F for cold food holding. -When pureed, ground, or diced foods drop into the danger zone (below 125 degrees F), the mechanically altered food must be re-heated to 165 degrees F for 15 seconds if holding for hot service. On 2/29/24, between 8:07 A.M. and 9:06 A.M., the surveyor observed the following on the North Two Unit: -The first breakfast cart was delivered to the Unit at 8:07 A.M. -The first resident breakfast tray was served in the Dining Room at 8:11 A.M. (4 minutes later)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-05 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee meets at least quarterly and as needed to coordinate and evaluate activities under the QAPI program, such as identifying issues with respect to which quality assessment and assurance activities, including performance improvement projects required under the QAPI program are necessary. Specifically, the facility failed to provide evidence that three out of four quarterly meetings QAPI had been conducted as required. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Quality Assurance Responsibilities, dated 11/5/19, indicated the QAPI committee was to meet at a minimum quarterly. Review of the QAPI binder provided to the surveyor indicated a quarterly QAPI meeting was held on 12/18/23. Further review of the QAPI binder showed no evidence that any other quarterly (March 2023, June 2023 and September 2023) QAPI meetings were held in 2023. During an interview on 3/5/24 at 3:18 PM, the Administrator said the QAPI committee should meet at least quarterly. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to respect the rights and ensure the dignified treatment of one Resident (#89) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to: -knock and obtain permission before opening the door to Resident #89's room when the Resident was receiving personal care, resulting in the Resident being exposed to individuals in the hallway. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Rights, dated 11/5/19, indicated the facility's policy was to respect the rights of residents and maintain residents' dignity. Resident #89 was admitted to the facility in September 2022, with diagnoses including Dementia (group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life) and Cognitive (related to thinking, reasoning, remembering, and using language) Communication Deficit. On 2/28/24 at 9:01 A.M., two surveyors observed Resident #89 positioned in bed in his/her room. The Resident's body was observed to be covered with his/her bed sheets. At this time, the surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify seven Residents (#89, #75, #28, #46, #41, #80, and #81) out of a total sample of 26 residents, and/or their Representatives and the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, in writing, of the Residents' transfer from the facility. Specifically, the facility staff failed to provide a written Notice of Transfer or Discharge to the seven Residents and/or Resident Representatives and notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of the Residents' transfers from the facility to the hospital. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Transfer and Discharge, dated 10/16/23, indicated: -The facility would maintain a transfer and discharge process that complied with regulatory requirements and maintained the resident's quality of life. -Before the facility transferred or discharged a resident, the facility would notify the resident and the resident's representative of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, policy and record review, the facility failed to re-submit a Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR- is a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care. PASRR requires that: 1) all applicants to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility be evaluated for serious mental disorder and/or intellectual disability (ID), 2) be offered the most appropriate setting for their needs [in the community, a nursing facility, or acute care setting], and 3) receive the services they need in those settings) when it was identified that one Resident (#77) out of a total sample of 26 residents, had a serious mental illness (SMI). Findings include: Review of the facility Policy titled Social Services Coordination with PASRR Program, last revised 2/2/24, indicated the following: -All individuals with a mental disorder or intellectual disability who apply for admission to this facility will be screened in accordance with the State's Medicaid rules for screening. -Any resident who exhibits newly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a discharge plan for one Resident (#304) out of a sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to develop a discharge plan who required assistance with applying for housing programs and alternative options for discharge. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Social Services Post-Discharge Plan, revised 11/5/19, indicated: -When the facility anticipates a resident's discharge to a private residence or to another nursing facility, a post-discharge plan will be developed which will assist the resident to adjust to his or her new living environment. -The post discharge plan will be developed by the care plan team with the assistance of the Resident . -The medical record must be documented as to the reason why a discharge plan was not developed. -At a minimum, the post discharge plan will include: a) A description of the resident's .preference for care b) A description of how the resident .will access and pay for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that activities of daily living (ADL's- activities related to personal care which include bathing, dressing, grooming and eating) were provided for one Resident (#2), who was dependent on staff for care, out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that personal care relative to grooming needs was provided for Resident #2. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), initiated 1/23/24, indicated: -Residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. -Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADL's independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with hygiene (bathing, grooming, and oral care) . -A resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, policy and record review, the facility failed to implement weight monitoring to maintain the nutritional status for one Resident (#28) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, For Resident #28, the facility staff failed to obtain weekly weights as ordered by a Physician for a Resident identified at nutritional risk resulting in a significant weight loss (7.6%) in 90 days. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Weigh Assessment and Interventions, last revised 1/19/22, indicated: -The threshold criteria for significant unplanned and undesired weight loss/gain will be based on the following criteria: .a. 1 month - 5% weight loss is significant; greater than 5% is severe b. 3 months - 7.5% weight loss is significant; greater than 7.5% is severe c. 6 months - 10% weight loss is significant; greater than 10% is severe -The nursing staff will measure resident weights on admission, and then weekly for four weeks. If no weight concerns are noted at this point, weights will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, policy and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who are trauma survivors receive culturally-competent and trauma-informed care for one Resident (#304) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to identify Resident #304's past history of trauma and/or triggers which may cause re-traumatization. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Trauma-Centered Care, revised 11/5/19, indicated the following: A. Early screening and Comprehensive Assessment of Trauma: The initial (upon admission) intake, assessment and documentation process includes questions designed to sensitively and respectfully explore prior .and current trauma related experiences. B. Consumer-Driven Care and Services: Residents will receive information about their rights and program. opportunities, education about the impact of trauma, and exploration of options to ensure that they participate fully in making informed decisions about every aspect of their care.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that two Licensed Nurses (Nurse #2 and Unit Manager [UM] #2) out of three Licensed Nurses reviewed possessed the specific competencies and skills necessary to care for the needs of one Resident (#60). Specifically, the facility staff failed to ensure that Nurse #2 and UM #2 were assessed for competency relative to the care of PUs when Resident #60 developed a PU and required PU care from both Licensed Nurses. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Skin Prevention, Assessment and Treatment, dated 5/2/22, indicated the following: -Nursing staff should keep the attending Physician aware of the progress of all ulcers, especially those in higher risk residents . -The Physician should be notified and consulted if an ulcer does not show signs of healing after 14 days of the same treatment. Review of the Nursing Facility Assessment, dated 2/26/24, indicated: -The facility must have . nursing staff with the appropriate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record and policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that recommendations made by the Consultant Pharmacist during a monthly Medication Regime Review (MRR) were reviewed by the Physician and responded to as required, for one Resident (#25) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, for Resident #25, the facility staff failed to respond to the Pharmacist Consultant's request to monitor for signs and symptoms of bleeding for a Resident receiving anticoagulant (medication used to thin out the blood) therapy. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Regime Review, initiated 11/1/15 and revised 11/5/19, indicated: -During the review, the Consultant Pharmacist will evaluate for actual or potential signs and symptoms that could indicate medication-related adverse consequences. -Any irregularities will be communicated to the Physician utilizing a written recommendation and report for consideration. -Copies of the medication regime review and written recommendations will be maintained as part of the permanent medical record.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor for side effects and adverse reactions to medications for one Resident (#25) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, for Resident #25, the facility staff failed to monitor for side effects and adverse reactions related to the use of an anticoagulant (medication used to thin out the blood) medication. Findings include: Review of the Facility policy titled Anticoagulant Therapy, initiated 11/1/15 and revised 5/5/20, indicated: -Residents receiving anticoagulation therapy require regular monitoring and will have anticoagulation PT/INR (PT: prothrombin time - measures the time it takes blood plasma [liquid portion of blood] to clot/ INR: international normalised ratio - tells how long it takes the blood to clot) tracking information placed on the Medication Administration Record (MAR). -All anticoagulation therapy requires close monitoring and it is critical that the resident is continually assessed for adverse drug reactions (ADR) such as bruising, bleeding gums, rectal bleeding (melena), bloody urine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to schedule a follow-up dental appointment for one Resident (#77) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, for Resident #77, the facility staff failed to re-schedule a dental appointment to have teeth extracted after the Resident was assessed by the Dental Consultant, extractions were recommended, and medical approval for the procedure was obtained. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Dental Services, initiated 10/15/23, indicated the following: -The facility will assist residents in obtaining routine .dental care. -If necessary or requested the facility will assist the resident in making appointments and arrange for transportation to and from the dental services location. -The facility will provide or obtain from an outside resource, dental services to meet the needs of each resident. Resident #77 was admitted to the facility in March 2022 with diagnosis of Dementia (a group of conditions characterized by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-29 · tag F0557 — widespreadHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, records reviewed, and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) and one non-sampled resident (Non-Sampled Resident (NS-RT) #11, the facility failed to treat the residents with dignity and respect and provide them assistance with grooming and meals and provide consistent meal service. Additionally, for three of three resident care areas (North 1 Unit, North 2 Unit, and South 2 Unit), the facility failed to provide residents with adequate supplies for personal care use. Findings include: The Facility Policy, titled Resident Rights, dated 11/05/19, indicated the Facility would respect the rights of the residents by providing care with an approach aimed at maintaining dignity. 1) Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in February 2021, diagnoses included hypertension, presence of cardiac pacemaker, dementia, depression, anxiety, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and low back pain. Review of Resident #1's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Care Plan, dated as revised on 11/13/23, indicated he/she required extensive assistance to dependence on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-29 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, records reviewed, and interviews, for three of three nursing units (North 1 Unit, North 2 Unit, and South 2 Unit), the Facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to ensure they maintained a sufficient number of Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) on the units so that all residents received the necessary care and services to meet their individual care needs. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Assessment, dated 12/10/23, indicated the Facility was licensed for 123 beds, and the Facility would try to staff at a ratio of 45% direct care nursing for first shift, 35% for second shift, and 20% for third shift. Review of the Daily Census, dated 12/26/23, indicated there were three Resident Units in the Facility. The Resident Units and their Resident Census were: - North 1, which had 41 available beds, and the census was 35. - North 2, which had 41 available beds, and the census was 38. - South 2, which had 41 available beds, and the census was 41. Review of the Facility's Detailed Census Report, dated 12/01/23 through 12/28/23 indicated the Facility's total…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — widespreadSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for three of three sampled residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3), the Facility failed to ensure they maintained complete and accurate medical records including but not limited to medication administration, refusal of care, and documentation of care provided by Certified Nurse Aides to residents. Findings include: The Facility's Policy, titled, Charting and Documentation, dated 11/05/19, indicated each resident would have an active medical record that contained accurately documented information, and that they would be accurate and complete. The Facility's Policy, titled Certified Nursing Assistant Documentation, dated 11/05/19, indicated Certified Nursing Assistants would document Resident care on point of care. 1) Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in February 2021, diagnoses included hypertension, presence of cardiac pacemaker, dementia, depression, anxiety, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and low back pain. Review of Resident #1's current Order Summary Report indicated he/she had physicians orders for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, records reviewed and interviews, the Facility failed to ensure it provided a sanitary environment in an effort to prevent contamination and transmission of infections. Findings include: The Facility's Policy, titled Laundry, dated 03/24/23, indicated both soiled and clean linens would be stored and handled in such a manner as to prevent contamination of environment and persons. The Facility's Policy, titled Infection Prevention and Control, dated 09/01/21, indicated an infection control program would be established and maintained to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, and the infection prevention and control program was a Facility wide effort involving all disciplines and individuals. During an initial tour of the Facility on 12/27/23 at 8:37 A.M., with the Housekeeping Supervisor, Maintenance Director, and Administrator, in the basement level of the Facility where laundry, housekeeping, and central supply were located, the Surveyor made the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, records reviewed, and interviews, for one of three resident care units (North 2 Unit), the facility failed to ensure the call system button was accessible and within reach for Residents to call for assistance, per facility policy. Findings include: The Facility Policy, titled Resident Call Bells, dated 11/05/20, indicated the Facility would be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance, the communication system would be checked regularly to ensure it could be reached by the resident, when leaving the room staff would ensure that the communication system was left within reach of the resident regardless of the resident's ability to use it. During a tour on 12/27/23 from 8:01 A.M. to 8:32 A.M., on the North 2 Unit, the Surveyor observed the following: - room [ROOM NUMBER]-B, the call bell was on the floor, out of reach of the resident, who was in bed. - room [ROOM NUMBER]-A, the call bell was clipped to the wall, out of reach of the resident, who was in bed. - room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for two of three sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #3) and 11 non-sampled residents (Non-Sampled Residents (NS-RT) #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, and #14), the Facility failed to ensure that individualized plans of care were developed and identified interventions that were consistently implemented by staff that met each residents' individualized care needs. Findings include: The Facility Policy, titled Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 6/25/23, indicated that an individualized comprehensive care plan that included measurable objectives and timetables to meet the residents' medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs would be developed for each resident. The Facility Policy, titled Using the Care Plan, dated 11/06/19, indicated the Care Plan would be used in developing the resident's daily care routines and would be available to staff who had the responsibility for providing care to the resident. 1) Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in February 2021, diagnoses included dementia, depression, anxiety, dysphagia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, records reviewed, and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who required extensive physical assistance to total dependence on staff to meet his/her care needs, and for Non-Sampled Resident (NS-RT) #5, who also required physical assistance from staff with care, the Facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care was consistently provided by staff. Findings include: During an interview on 12/27/23 at 12:00 P.M., the Regional Nurse Manager said the Facility did not have a specific policy for Activities of Daily Living. 1) Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in February 2021, diagnoses included dementia, depression, anxiety, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and low back pain. Review of Resident #1's ADL Care Plan, dated as revised on 08/08/23, indicated he/she required extensive assistance and at times was dependent on staff for bathing, grooming, and dressing. Review of the Shower Schedule for the South 2 Unit, undated, indicated Resident #1's showers were scheduled on Mondays on the 3:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. shift and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-29 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, records reviewed, and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #3), who was cognitively impaired and wandered, the Facility failed to ensure they implemented a meaningful and engaging activity to support Resident #3's physical, mental, and psychosocial well being. Findings include: The Facility Policy, tilted Activities Programs, dated revised 11/05/19. indicated the Facility has an ongoing program of activities that is designed to meet the needs of each resident. The Policy indicated an adequate space and equipment are provided to ensure that needed services identified in the resident's plan of care are met. Resident #3 was admitted to the Facility September 2022, diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, dementia, Anxiety Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, depression, dysphagia, hypertension, muscle weakness, cognitive communication, and difficulty with walking. Review of Resident #3's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Care Plan, dated last reviewed on 12/14/23, indicated he/she would benefit from accommodations for cognitive limitations by using…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), the Facility failed to ensure nursing care met professional standards or practice, when on 12/25/23, Nurse #1 failed to administer medications in a timely manner, failed to notify his/her physician of the late medication administration, and failed to document that the medication was administered later than the scheduled time. Findings include: The Facility Policy, titled Administering Medication, dated 03/19/20, indicated medications would be administered within one hour of the prescribed times, and if a medication was withheld, refused, or given other than at the scheduled time, the nurse administering the medication would chart in the Electronic Medical Record (eMAR) and sign off for that particular medication and document a rationale. Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in February 2021, diagnoses included hypertension, presence of cardiac pacemaker, dementia, depression, anxiety, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and low back pain. Review of Resident #1's current Order Summary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed, interviews, and observations, the Facility failed to ensure that meals prepared for and delivered to each resident, were served at an appropriate temperature. Findings include: Review of the Meal Schedule, indicated the North 2 Unit breakfast carts are delivered on North 2 at 7:59 A.M. and 8:08 A.M. During an interview on 12/27/23 at 8:10 A.M., Non Sampled Resident (NS-RT) #16 said for lunch and dinner he/she requests peanut butter sandwiches daily, because the Facility serves the same food all the time, said the food that is meant to be hot is cold, and said the food was awful. NS-RT #16 said the Facility cannot go wrong with peanut butter sandwiches. During an interview on 12/29/23 at 9:22 A.M., The Facility's [NAME] said the North 2 Unit breakfast cart should be delivered to the unit between 8:00 A.M. to 8:10 A.M. During an observation on 12/29/23 at 8:17 A.M., on the North 2 Unit, the Surveyor observed staff passing out breakfast trays to residents and that it took staff one hour and 12 minutes to pass out all of the breakfast trays to residents.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had severe cognitive impairment, the Facility failed to ensure staff implemented and followed their Abuse Policy when on 08/24/23 at 10:50 P.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 witnessed Nurse #1 throw a cup of liquid (later identified as juice and Risperidone) into Resident #1's face, and did not notify Nursing Supervisor #1 until after she told the story to the 11:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M. Nurse, who instructed her to do so. Nurse #1 continued to work on Resident #1's unit until 12:11 A.M. on 08/25/23, placing other residents at risk for potential abuse, and Resident #1 at risk for the potential of continued abuse. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy titled, Abuse Prohibition, dated as revised 10/24/22, indicated the following: -anyone that witnesses an incident of suspected abuse, neglect, involuntary seclusion, injuries of unknown origin or misappropriation of patient property is to the the abuser to stop…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed, review of surveillance camera video footage, and interviews. for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), the Facility failed ensure medications were stored properly, when on 08/24/23 during the 3:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. (evening) shift, Nurse #1 (who was seated at the nurses' station) left a cup of liquid containing an antipsychotic medication on her unattended medication cart and Resident #1 attempted to drink it. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy titled, LTC Facility's Pharmacy Services and Procedures Manual, dated 08/07/23, indicated that the Facility should ensure that all medications and biologicals, including treatments items, are securely stored in a locked cabinet/cart or locked medication room that is inaccessible by residents and visitors. Review of the Facility's Policy titled, NSG305 Medication: Administration: General, dated as revised, 06/01/21, indicated the following: -maintain security of care and keys at all times, and -if medication is refused by patient, discard medication and attempt to administer again at a later…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-06-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review the facility staff failed to maintain infection control standards to prevent the further spread of COVID-19 in the facility by ensuring all visitors and employees were screened for signs and symptoms of COVID-19 and exposure to others with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. The facility also failed to ensure staff assessed residents for signs and symptoms of COVID-19 on every shift as required during an outbreak on two out of two applicable units. Findings include: Review of the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (DPH) guidance, Caring for Long-Term Residents during the COVID-19 Response, dated, 1/25/22 indicated the following: -Long-term care facilities must screen all individuals entering the facility, including healthcare personnel (HCP) and visitors, for symptoms. -In accordance with previously issued guidance, every facility must establish a process to ensure everyone arriving at the facility is assessed for symptoms of COVID-19 (cough, shortness of breath, or sore throat, myalgia, chills, or new onset loss of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility staff failed to: (1) Follow Physician's orders for weekly skin checks, use of seat belts, and dressing changes, (2) Develop care plans for dementia and behavioral symptoms, and (3) To implement care plans.and dressing changes for seven residents (#13, #31, #35, #61, #84, #88, and #96) out of a total sample of 23 residents, Findings include: 1. Resident #88 was admitted to the facility in May 2022. Review of the Resident's care plan for skin risk indicated an intervention for weekly skin checks, initiated on 5/13/22, to be done by a licensed nurse, as well as an intervention to observe skin condition daily with care, also initiated on 5/13/22. Review of the Resident's electronic health record did not indicate that any weekly skin check had been done by a licensed nurse since the Resident's date of admission in May 2022. During an interview on 6/15/22 at 3:38 P.M., the Corporate Clinical Nurse said that no weekly skin checks could be located in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-16 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide sufficient nurse staffing for two out of three days (7:00 A.M. - 3:00 P.M.) shifts, during the survey period, on the South Two Unit. Specifically, the facility provided one nurse for the care of 41 residents which resulted in late medication administration to residents on the Unit. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 5/26/22, included that the nurse staffing ratio was to be one nurse to every 20 residents on the day shift, and based on acuity. Review of the facility's Daily Census Report, dated 6/13/22, indicated that there were 41 residents on the South Two Unit. Review of the facility's Daily Staffing Sheet, dated 6/14/22, indicated that only one nurse worked the day shift on the South Two Unit. Review of the facility's Daily Census Report, dated 6/14/22, indicated that there were 41 residents on the South Two Unit. During an observation and interview on 6/14/22 at 4:45 P.M., Nurse #6 said that she was the only nurse that worked the day shift, that she was responsible for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-16 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to offer a pneumococcal immunization to two Residents (#55 and #93) and the influenza (flu) immunization (during the October 1, 2021 to March 30, 2022 flu season) for one Resident (#93) in a sample of five residents, when there was no documentation that indicated the vaccines were medically contraindicated or administered before admission to the facility. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Pneumococcal Vaccination- Prevnar 13 (PCV 13) or Pneumovax (PPSV 23), revised 9/2/20, included but was not limited to the following: -centers will provide the opportunity to receive the pneumococcal vaccine to all patients; -with attending physician order/ authorization for all patients; -with patient/resident representative consent. -upon admission, obtain the pneumococcal vaccination history of all patients -document pneumococcal vaccination history . Review of a facility policy titled, Influenza Immunization Program, revised 11/15/21, included but was not limited to the following: A licensed nurse will provide the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-06-16 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — patternPerform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility staff failed to: 1) perform COVID-19 outbreak testing for three Residents (#18, #55 and #93) at the required frequency, between 5/3/22 and 6/8/22, during an outbreak on the North One Unit. 2) perform contact tracing and subsequent outbreak testing of healthcare personnel (HCP) and residents on the South Two Unit after a resident tested positive for COVID-19 on 5/28/22. 3) perform required weekly surveillance testing on one out of three sampled staff members. Findings include: Review of the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website, updated 2/2/22, included the following guidance for Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Spread in Nursing Homes, New Infection in Healthcare Personnel or Residents: -When performing an outbreak response to a known case, facilities should always defer to the recommendations of the jurisdiction's public health authority. Review of the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (DPH)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility staff failed to obtain a physician's order for the treatment of an open wound for one Resident (#69) out of 23 sampled residents. Findings include: Resident #69 was admitted to the facility in January 2022. On 6/14/22 at 8:33 A.M., the surveyor observed the Resident dressed and seated in a wheelchair in his/her room. The Resident had slipper socks on. The Resident said that he/she had open areas on the top of his/her left foot and that his/her feet were sometimes painful. The Resident said he/she never had problems with their feet prior to admission to the facility. Review of a wound consult, dated 6/10/22, indicated there was a new lymphedema (swelling caused by a blockage in the lymphatic system) ulcer on the left dorsal (top) foot, 2.0 centimeters (cm) x 4.5 cm x 0.1 cm, small amount of serous (clear) drainage. Further review indicated the plan was as follows: -Wound dressing-Xeroform (a sterile, non-adhering protective dressing consisting of absorbent, fine-mesh gauze impregnated with a petrolatum blend) and dry…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained free of accident hazards, specifically related to storage of smoking materials, for one Resident (#34) out of four applicable sampled residents. Findings include: Resident #34 was admitted to the facility in April 2022. Review of the facility's Resident Smoking Policy, dated 12/14/17, indicated the smoking supplies (including, but not limited to, tobacco, matches, lighters etc.) would be labeled with the patient's name, and maintained by staff, stored in a suitable cabinet kept at the nurses's station. If the patient was cognitively and physically able to secure smoking materials, the Center may allow him/her to maintain his/her own tobacco or electronic cigarettes. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/17/22, indicated the Resident was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. During an interview on 6/14/22 at 9:00 A.M., Resident #34 said the smoke breaks were at 10:00 A.M., 2:00 P.M. and 6:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-16 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#88) was assessed for risk of entrapment from bed rails, failed to ensure the risks and benefits of bed rails were reviewed with the resident or resident representative prior to the use of bed rails, and failed to obtain informed consent for the use of bed rails, out of a total sample of 23 residents. Findings include: Review of the policy for Bed Rails, revised 3/1/22, indicated the following: -The Bed Rail Evaluation will be completed before admission, quarterly, change in bed or mattress, and with a significant change in status. -Prior to use of a bed rail, the resident will be evaluated for the use of bed rails. -Review the risk and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative -Obtain informed consent from the resident or resident representative -Update care plan Resident #88 was admitted to the facility in May, 2022. On 6/14/22 at 9:37 A.M. the surveyor observed Resident #88 in bed. Bilateral, raised, quarter side rails were observed on the resident's bed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-16 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide individualized meaningful approaches relative to behavioral health care for one Resident (#13) out of 23 total sampled residents when the Resident demonstrated verbal behavioral symptoms during the survey period. Findings include: Resident #13 was admitted to the facility in March 2022 with the following diagnoses: post-traumatic stress disorder, unspecified psychosis, depression, and unspecified mood disorder. Review of the Recreation Comprehensive Assessment, dated 3/23/22, included that Resident #13 had moderate to high ability/endurance and that he/she exhibited or was at risk for limited and/or meaningful engagement due to cognitive loss. Review of the Quarterly Recreation Progress Note and Care Plan Evaluation, dated 6/11/22, indicated that Resident #13 had high ability/endurance and included the following preferences and interventions: - snacks between meals - listening to country music - watching/listening to the television - going outside when the weather was good; enjoys sitting,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record relative to the application of thrombo-embolic deterrent (TED; compression stockings used to reduce the risk for blood clots) stockings for one Resident (#35) out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, facility staff recorded that TED stockings were applied to Resident #35's lower extremities on two out of three days during the survey period, but the Resident did not have the stockings on. Resident #35 was admitted to the facility in July 2021 with the following diagnosis: venous insufficiency (improper functioning of the vein valves in the leg, causing swelling and skin changes). Review of the June 2022 Physician Orders included an order, initiated 4/5/22, for TEDs to both lower extremities to be applied in the morning and removed at bedtime daily. On 6/14/22 at 8:58 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #35 seated in his/her room. He/she was not wearing TED stockings. On 6/14/22 at 1:30 P.M., the surveyor observed Resident #35 seated in his/her room. He/she was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-16 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolatedHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of facility audits and reports, the facility failed to develop a Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan in a good faith effort to address the deficient practice relative to administration of the pneumococcal vaccination which had been identified on previous Department of Public Health surveys. Findings include: Review of the facility survey history indicated the facility had been issued citations for the deficient practice relative to the administration of the pneumococcal vaccination for surveys ending on 6/20/22 and 7/28/22. Review of the 7/2022 QAPI reports indicated the facility was aware of the previous citations for pneumococcal vaccines and had conducted education. There was no clear plan in place to systematically address concerns the facility had identified related to the administration of the pneumococcal vaccination. On 8/18/22 at 2:15 the survey team interviewed the Regional Nurse, the Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) and the Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON). The SDC said she knew the pneumococcal vaccines were a problem…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-16 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to a offer one Resident (#91) a Covid-19 booster when eligible, out of a total of five sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the policy titled, Covid-19 Vaccine, revised 11/15/21, included but was not limited to the following: Centers will provide the opportunity to receive Covid-19 vaccinations for all dose (this includes dose 1, dose 2, additional dose, booster, and any future doses) to all patients; -with attending physician order/ authorization for all patients; -with patient/resident representative consent. -upon admission, document patient Covid-19 vaccination status -on admission, document Covid-19 vaccination history. Review of clinical record indicated the resident had completed his/her primary vaccine series in May 2021. There was no documentation to indicate that Resident #91 had been offered, or given information, regarding the Covid-19 boosters. During an interview on 7/28/22 at 1:35 P.M., Director of Nursing (DON), said that she ran a facility report this morning to identify Covid-19 vaccine compliance.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-03-13 · tag F0843 — widespreadHave an agreement with at least one or more hospitals certified by Medicare or Medicaid to make sure residents can be moved quickly to the hospital when they need medical care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to have in effect a written transfer agreement with one or more hospitals approved for participation under the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that a written transfer agreement was updated when the Local Area Hospital listed on the facility transfer agreement was closed 8/31/24, increasing the risk for residents of the facility not to be admitted timely and appropriately to a hospital when transfer was determined by the attending Physician to be medically appropriate. Findings include: Review of the facility's Transfer and Affiliation Agreement indicated the facility, and [Local Area Hospital #1] had entered into the Agreement on 1/11/24. Review of the mass.gov website indicated the [Local Area Hospital #1] had been closed since 8/31/24. During an interview on 3/12/25 at 4:00 P.M., the Administrator said that he was aware [Local Area Hospital #1] was closed. The Administrator said that he thought the facility had written transfer agreements in place with two other hospitals and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-03-05 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Notice of Bed-Hold Policy at the time of transfer to a hospital or shortly thereafter for four Residents (#89, #75, #28, and #46) and/or their Representatives, out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to provide Resident's #89, #75, #28, and #46 and/or their Representatives with written notification relative to Bed-Holds when the Residents were transferred from the facility to the hospital and were expected to return to the facility. Findings include: 1. Resident #89 was admitted to the facility in September 2022 with diagnoses including Cognitive (related to thinking, reasoning, remembering, and using language) Communication Deficit and Dementia (group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life). Review of a Physician's order dated 11/8/23, indicated: Health Care Proxy (HCP) invoked (put into effect). Review of Resident #89's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-12-29 · tag F0837 — widespreadEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and license review, the facility failed to ensure the Administrator was licensed in Massachusetts, as required. Findings include: In an email to the Surveyor, dated 01/02/24, the Regional Nurse Manager said the Facility did not have a policy regarding administrative management. During an interview on 12/27/23 at 7:46 A.M., the Administrator said that on 12/22/23 the Facility's previous administrator unexpectedly left the position, and the company asked her to fill in as interim Administrator. The Administrator said her first day as the Administrator at the Facility was 12/27/23, said she was not licensed as a Nursing Home Administrator in Massachusetts, and had not yet applied for reciprocity. The Administrator said she was licensed as an administrator in New York. The Administrator said there was no Massachusetts licensed administrator assigned to oversee the Facility since the previous administrator left on 12/22/23.
- No harm found · C2023-12-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, records reviewed, and interviews, the Facility failed to ensure it provided a safe, functional, and sanitary environment, in the basement level of the Facility where laundry services and central supply was located, there was an ongoing problem with waste water and sewage drainage. Findings include: The Facility Policy, titled Laundry, dated 03/24/23, indicated the Facility would meet or exceed the safety and sanitation requirements set forth by State and Federal Regulations regarding the laundering of soiled linens, and soiled linens would be stored and handled in such a manner as to prevent contamination of environment and persons. The Facility's Policy, titled Infection Prevention and Control, dated 09/01/21, indicated an infection control program would be established and maintained to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, and the infection prevention and control program was a Facility wide effort involving all disciplines and individuals. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-12-29 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, records reviewed, and interviews, the Facility failed to ensure they maintained an effective pest control program, when from October 2023 to the end of December 2023, the basement level of the Facility, where laundry services and central supplies was located, there was an infestation of small gnat-like flying insects. Findings include: The Facility's Policy, titled Pest Control, dated 11/19/19, indicated the Facility would manage unwanted pests, and would maintain routine pest control services. During an initial tour on 12/27/23 at 8:37 A.M., with the Housekeeping Manager, Maintenance Director, and Administrator, of the basement level of the Facility where laundry, housekeeping, and central supply were located, the Surveyor observed numerous small gnat-like flying insects throughout the basement. Review of the Pest Control Service Inspection Reports, dated 10/31/23, 11/28/23, and 12/28/23, indicated there was no documentation to support that the pest control company serviced the basement level of the Facility. During an interview on 12/27/23 while on tour at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$63,034 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $53,264 — penalty dated 2024-03-05
- $9,770 — penalty dated 2023-09-27
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to STERN CONSULTANTS — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRIEDMAN, SHANA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 12% | since 10/16/2023 |
| BEATTY, BRITTANY | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/16/2023 |
| FRIEDMAN, BENJAMIN | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/16/2023 |
| COM FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 10% | since 10/16/2023 |
| MILLMAN, CHAIM | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/16/2023 |
| NEWHOUSE, ERIC | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/16/2023 |
| ERBLICH, AVRAHAM | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/16/2023 |
| NILSSON, CLAES | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/16/2023 |
| SHEPS, BORUCH | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/16/2023 |
| ETN FAMILY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/16/2023 |
| STERN THERAPY CONSULTANTS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/06/2025 |
| TLCO HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/16/2023 |
| CAMBRIDGE, JOSHUA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/16/2023 |
| PLEW, ANDREA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/16/2023 |
| AYER VALLEY PROPCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/16/2023 |
| E NEWHOUSE FAMILY TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/16/2023 |
| T NEWHOUSE FAMILY TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/16/2023 |
| TLM FAMILY TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/16/2023 |
| STERN, BEZALEL | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/16/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 43 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 38% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225421. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.