No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Andover Manor Rehab And Nursing

89 Morton Street, Andover, MA 01810 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 174 certified beds · (978) 475-0944 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (978) 475-0944 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jan 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • about 25% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
63 Park St · (978) 474-1700 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
68 Main St · (978) 470-0542 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Sandwich0.9 mi
40 Railroad St · (978) 749-6664 · Call to confirm hours
Park
The Park0.4 mi
Chestnut St · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.3%16.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.6%5.1%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.5%1.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms15.1%15.5%6.5%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.3%3.4%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.2%15.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.1%19.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.7%94.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.6%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.3%21.2%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table28.5%21.4%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine80.6%77.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.6%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.7%11.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.461.881.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.581.501.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 78 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

54.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
26.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.10U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 26.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 6% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF54.6%CMS range 42.3–66.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 7.1–13.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge26.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge33.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge30.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.8%CMS range 3.5–13.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.821.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.56
RN hours/ resident / day
0.88
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.35
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.80
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.34
RN hoursweekends
47.0%
Total nursing turnover
61.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 174 beds and averages 125.3 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 49 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.80 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.35 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.36 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.97 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-15)
20
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-09)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

51 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure it provided an environment free of potential safety hazards on one of one Dementia Special Care Units (DSCU). Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that a closet containing cleaning chemicals was kept locked and was not accessible to residents with dementia and wandering behaviors. Findings include:On 1/13/26 at 8:19 A.M., the surveyor observed the housekeeper on the A2 unit open the door marked closet to obtain some supplies, then walked away. The door was unlocked when the housekeeper accessed it. On 1/13/26 at 8:20 A.M., the surveyor was able to gain access to the unlocked closet. Housekeeping chemicals were observed in the closet. At this time there were three residents wandering and ambulating past the closet, up and down the hallway. On 1/13/26 at 8:21 A.M., the surveyor observed the housekeeper go back into the closet, which remained unlocked, for more supplies, then closed the door, leaving the closet unlocked. On 1/15/26 at 7:28 A.M., the surveyor observed a housekeeper on the A2 unit open the closet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a dignified environment for one Resident (#77) out of a total of 32 sampled Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff did not store personal items in Resident #77's room. Resident# 77 was admitted to the facility in May 2025 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) 12/8/25 indicated Resident #77 is severely cognitively impaired evidenced by a score of 8 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam. Resident #77 was unable to participate in the interview process. On 1/13/26 at 8:23 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #77 asleep in his/her bed. Resident #77 did not have a roommate, but a tote bag with two fleece shirts draped on top of it was observed on the unoccupied bed's night table. On 1/14/26 at 7:39 A.M., and on 1/15/26 at 7:23 A.M., the tote bag and fleece shirts were observed on the top shelf of the closet in Resident #77's room. On 1/15/26 at 8:45 A.M., the Assistant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure it followed its grievance process for one Resident (Resident #17) out of 32 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to document, investigate and provide a resolution to lost dentures. Findings include:Review of the facility policy Resident and Family Concerns and Grievances, dated as revised 10/5/25, indicated:- The facility Compliance and Ethics Officer or a designated staff will document and keep a log of all grievances expressed either orally and/or in writing on the day that it is received or as soon as possible after the event or events that precipitated the grievance. Management or supervisory staff will commence a formal investigation of the grievance as soon as practicable and advise the resident of the outcome of the investigation.Resident #17 was admitted to the facility in July 2021 with diagnoses that included heart disease and diabetes.Review of Resident #17's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/2/25, indicated he/she did not have broken or loosely fitting full or partial dentures,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for one Resident (#38) out of a total sample of 32 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive plan of care for a pacemaker. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive care Plan, dated as revised 10/25/25, indicated that an individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs is developed for each resident. Review of the facility policy titled Pacemaker Function and Testing, dated as revised 10/25/25, indicated results of testing should be documented in the medical record. Resident #38 was admitted to the facility in October 2021 with diagnoses including presence of a pacemaker, atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 10/8/25, indicated that Resident #38 is cognitively intact, scoring a 13 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for dependent residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide assistance with showers for two Residents (#64 and #12) out of a total sample of 32 Residents.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting, dated as revised 12/5/25, indicated but was not limited to the following: 1. Residents will be provided with care treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADL). Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the service is necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal oral hygiene. 2. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADL's independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care and services consistent with professional standards of practice, and in accordance with physician's orders were provided for three Residents (#40, #72 and #15) out of a total sample of 32 residents. Specifically:1. For Resident #40 the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing and humidification bottle was changed and dated.2. For Resident #72, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing and humidification bottle was changed and dated.3.For Resident #15, the facility failed to ensure nebulizer equipment and tubing was changed/dated and b) failed to ensure the oxygen concentrator filter was cleaned.Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration and Storage dated revised 10/25/25 indicated that the humidifier bottle is to be labeled with the date of application and changed weekly if refillable. If it is disposable . it is to be changed at least weekly . Further review indicated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure medications and biologicals were labeled in one out of four medication carts.2. Ensure medications were stored securely for one Resident #38 out of a total sample of 32 residents. Findings include:1. On 1/15/26 at 8:25 A.M., the surveyor observed the following in the medication cart on the A3 unit:One Anoro Ellipta inhaler (used to treat asthma) open and not labeled with a date. Review of the pharmacy label indicated the inhaler was dispensed 11/5/25. Review of the manufacturer's directions indicated the inhaler is to be discarded 6 weeks after opening. One Anoro Ellipta inhaler dated as opened on 11/16/25 inside a box dated as opened 10/31/25. Review of the pharmacy label indicated the inhaler was dispensed 10/30/25. Review of the manufacturer's directions indicated the inhaler is to be discarded 6 weeks after opening. During an interview on 1/15/26 at 8:25 A.M., Nurse #3 said that the inhalers should be labeled accurately. 2. Review of the facility policy titled Administering Medication, dated as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide dental services to one resident (Resident #17) of 32 sampled residents. Specifically, the Dentist recommended replacement dentures, and the facility did not review or implement the recommendation. Findings include: Resident #17 was admitted to the facility in July 2021 with diagnoses that included heart disease and diabetes.Review of Resident #17's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated he/she did not have broken or loosely fitting full or partial dentures, or mouth or facial pain, discomfort or difficulty with chewing. Resident #17 scored a 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam, indicating intact cognition.Review of Resident #17's dental care plan dated 3/31/25 indicated the Resident has altered oral/dental health related to lost upper denture and missing/cavity on bottom teeth. Care plan interventions did not indicate replacement of the lost dentures.Review of Resident #17's Dentist note dated 9/5/25 indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide one Resident (#25) with a therapeutic diet as ordered by the physician out of a total sample of 32 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #25 received a Dysphagia Advanced, textured diet as prescribed by the physician.Findings includeReview of the facility policy titled Diet/Fluid/Supplement, dated as revised 4/12/25, indicated but was not limited to:According to the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics in Massachusetts Long-Term Care regulations, Physicians shall write a diet order in the medical record for each resident, indicating whether the resident is to have a general (regular) or a therapeutic diet. A therapeutic diet is defined as a diet order by the physician as part of a treatment for a disease or clinical condition, to eliminate or decrease certain substances in the diet (e.g., sodium) or to increase certain substances in the diet (e.g., via supplements) or to provide food in a form that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and records reviewed, the facility failed to ensure for one Resident (#12), out of a total sample of 32 residents, a physical therapy evaluation was completed timely.Findings include:Resident #12 was admitted to the facility in July 2025 with diagnoses including pain in the left hip, muscle spasm, arthropathy (joint disorder), osteonecrosis left femur (bone disorder), primary osteoarthritis (joint disease) right shoulder, primary osteoarthritis left shoulder, major depressive disorder, osteoporosis (deterioration of bone tissues), anemia (low oxygen carrying blood cells), limitation of activities due to disability and epilepsy.Review of Resident #12's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of a possible 15, which indicated Resident #12 had no cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated Resident #12 was dependent on staff for all functional tasks. Section GG of this MDS indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 41 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to accurately document in the medical record for two Residents (#40 and #72) out of a total sample of 32 residents. Specifically for Residents #40 and #72 the facility failed to accurately document that oxygen (O2) tubing and humidification bottles were changed as ordered. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Charting and Documentation dated revised 10/25/25 indicated that each resident will have an active medical record that contains accurately documented information, systematically organized and readily accessible to authorized persons.1. Resident #40 was admitted to the facility in November 2025 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer and heart failure.Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated that Resident #40 was severely cognitively impaired and scored a 3 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam. Further review indicated that Resident #40 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, on the A2 -unit, a housekeeper failed to implement proper hand hygiene and stored her personal beverage on the housekeeping cart. Findings include:Review of facility policy titled Hand Washing, dated as revised October 25, 2025, indicated the following:-Hand washing is an integral part of an effective infection control program. Its purpose is to reduce the risk of blood borne illness and prevent cross contamination.-Hands should be washed before resident care, after resident care, after breaks, after using the restroom, after smoking or eating, after blowing nose, after disposing of trash, after handling dirty dishes, after picking anything up from the floor, and at any other time deemed necessary. Review of facility policy titled Personal Protective Equipment, dated as revised October 25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#12), out of a total sample of 32 residents had a bed that was in operating condition. Specifically, Resident #12 was unable to raise the head of the bed to sit at an upright position.Findings include:Resident #12 was admitted to the facility in July 2025 and has diagnoses that include but not limited to asthma, PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder), depression, iron deficiency anemia (low red blood cells), pain in left hip, muscle spasm, arthropathy, osteonecrosis, left femur, primary osteoarthritis, right shoulder, primary osteoarthritis left shoulder, major depressive disorder, osteoporosis, anemia (low oxygen carrying blood cells), limitation of activities due to disability and epilepsy.Review of Resident #12's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of a possible 15, which indicated Resident #12 had no cognitive impairment. The MDS also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience for several residents on one resident care unit (The dementia care unit), out of three resident units. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy and procedure, titled Dining Room Rounds, dated as revised November 5, 2024, indicated the following: Our facility audits the food services department regularly to ensure that resident needs are being met and that dining is a safe and pleasant experience for residents. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 2. The auditor will assess: d. If residents at each table are served together, f. If adequate staff are available to assist with passing trays, meal set-up, and feeding. During an observation during the breakfast meal service on the dementia care unit the following was observed: On 1/6/25 at 8:38 A.M., table one's first resident received their meal at 8:38 A.M., the next resident did not receive their tray until 8:51 A.M., thirteen minutes later. On 1/6/25 at 8:40 A.M., table three's first resident received their meal at 8:40 A.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement person-centered care plans for five Residents (#6, #16, #25, #210 and #23) out of a sample of 29 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #6, the facility failed to implement his/her compression socks. 2. For Resident #16, the facility failed implement offloading his/her heels as per the plan of care. 3. For Resident #25, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive pacemaker care plan. 4. For Resident #210, the facility failed to develop personalized behavior care plans. 5. For Resident #23, facility failed to develop a personalized history of substance abuse care plan. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled 'Comprehensive Care Plan' with a revision date of October 2024 indicated the following: -An individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs is developed for each resident. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for 3 Residents (#19, #69 and #106) out of a total of 29 sampled residents. Specifically: 1. For Resident #19 the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for the use of an air mattress, 2. For Resident #69 the facility failed to discontinue a treatment for a healed right ankle, and 3. For Resident #106 the facility failed to ensure an antibiotic used to treat an infection was administered timely for one of two closed records reviewed. Findings include: Resident #19 was admitted to the facility in March 2024 with diagnoses including traumatic subdural hemorrhage, diabetes, and dysphagia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/16/24, indicated that Resident #19 was severely cognitively impaired as evidenced by staff assessment of Brief Interview for Mental Status. The MDS further indicated that Resident #19 had a pressure relieving device to his/her bed. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Advance Directives (written documents that instructs health care providers of the decisions for specific medical treatment if a person was unable to speak or lacked the capacity to make decisions for themselves) were consistently documented in the medical record for one Resident (#94), out of a total sample of 29 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Advanced Directives, dated 11/5/24, indicated The Advanced Directive shall be reviewed and updated upon resident request, with the comprehensive care plan, and with significant changes in resident. The Facility will implement the instructions outlined in the Advanced Directive. Resident #94 was admitted to the facility in February 2024 with diagnoses that included dementia, adult failure to thrive, and anxiety. Review of Resident #94's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated he/she scored a zero out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain privacy and confidentiality of personal and medical records on one out of three resident units. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled 'Patient Confidentiality' revised November 2024 indicated the following: -Patient confidentiality is keeping information about a patient's healthcare private. -Protect all records-keep all resident information covered. Don't leave it where unauthorized people can see it. On 1/6/25 at 8:02 A.M., the surveyor observed Nurse #10 at the medication cart. Nurse #10 walked away from the medication cart down the hall, left the computer screen unlocked revealing residents' medical and private information. Nurse #10 returned to the medication cart, did not lock the computer screen, walked away from the medication cart again, and walked down the hall. On 1/7/25 at 12:50 P.M., the surveyor observed Nurse # 11 at the medication cart. Nurse #11 walked away from the medication cart to the medication room leaving the computer screen unlocked revealing residents'…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to prevent a resident-to-resident altercation between two Residents (#56 and #23) out of a sample to 29 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to prevent Resident #23 from pinching Resident #56's left cheek. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled 'Resident Right to Freedom from Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation' with a revision date of October 2024 indicated the following: -The Facility's residents have the right to be free from abuse as defined in this policy. This policy applies to any and all owners, directors, officers, clinical staff, employees, independent contractors, consultants, and others currently or potentially working for the facility. -The Facility shall review altercations from resident to resident as a potential situation of abuse. -Staff shall monitor for any behaviors that may provoke a reaction by residents or others, which include but are not limited to, physically aggressive behavior, such as hitting, kicking,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the state agency within the mandated timeframes for two Residents (56 and #23) out of a sample of 29 residents after a resident to resident altercation. Specifically, the facility failed to file a report to the state agency after Resident #23 pinched Resident #56. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled 'Resident Right to Freedom from Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation' with a revision date of October 2024 indicated the following: -The Facility's residents have the right to be free from abuse as defined in this policy. This policy applies to any and all owners, directors, officers, clinical staff, employees, independent contractors, consultants, and others currently or potentially working for the facility. -The Facility shall review altercations from resident to resident as a potential situation of abuse. -Staff shall monitor for any behaviors that may provoke a reaction by residents or others, which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to identify and complete a Significant Change in Status (SCSA) Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) timely for one Resident (#19), out of a total sample of 29 residents, when the Resident was admitted to hospice services. Findings include: Review of the MDS 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, dated October 2024, indicated: - A Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) is required to be performed when a resident enrolls in a hospice program. A Significant Change in Status MDS is considered timely when the RN Assessment Coordinator signs the MDS as complete by the 14th calendar day after the assessment reference date (ARD). The ARD must be no later than 14 days after the Resident has enrolled on hospice service. Resident #19 was admitted to the facility in March 2024 with diagnoses that include traumatic subdural hemorrhage, diabetes, dysphagia requiring tube feedings. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set Assessment, (MDS) assessment, dated 12/16/24 indicated that the Resident could not participate in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure for one Resident (#66), out of a total sample of 29 residents, that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) was accurate. Specifically, the MDS failed to accurately assess Resident #66's limited range of motion in his/her left upper extremity. Findings include: Resident #66 was admitted to the facility in October 2022 and has diagnoses that include Alzheimer's disease, muscle weakness and multiple sclerosis. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated the staff assessment for mental status indicated Resident #66 as having severely impaired cognition. Further, the MDS indicated Resident #66 is dependent on staff for all daily care activities and did not have functional limitation in ROM in his/her extremities. On 1/6/25 at 8:07 A.M., Resident #66 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in the dining room. Resident #66 was repetitively vocalizing, and did not respond to the surveyors greeting. Resident #66 left arm was pulled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care for one Resident (#91) out of a total sample of 29 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan including resident specific interventions for a Resident who requires psychotropic medications. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plan, last revised 10/24, indicated the following: Policy Statement: Individual comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs is developed for each resident. Resident #91 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 and has diagnoses that include anxiety disorder, adjustment disorder, and dementia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/16/24, indicated that on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam Resident #91 scored a 3 out of a possible 15, indicating severely impaired cognition.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team for two Residents (#19 and #52) out of a total sample of 29 residents. Specifically: 1. For Resident #19, the facility failed ensure the entire comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by an interdisciplinary team following the completion of a comprehensive assessment for a significant change in status after Resident #19 was admitted to hospice services and 2. For Resident #52 the facility failed to review and update the care plan for the discontinuation of hospice care services. Specifically, Resident #52 was discharged from hospice care services on 4/27/24 and a hospice care plan remained in place for over eight months and after two quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments dated 8/8/24, and 11/7/24. Findings include: Resident #19 was admitted to the facility in March 2024 with diagnoses including traumatic subdural hemorrhage, diabetes, and dysphagia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure for one Resident (#107), out of 2 closed records that the interdisciplinary team participated in the discharge planning process. Review of the facility's Policy and Procedure dated as initiated November 1, 2015, indicated the following: Policy Interpretation and Implementation, 1. When the facility anticipates a resident's discharge to a private residence or to another nursing facility (i.e., skilled, intermediate care ICF, etc.) a post-discharge plan will be developed which will assist the resident to adjust to his or her new living environment. 2. The post-discharge plan will be developed by the care plan team with the assistance of the resident or his or her family. 4. As a minimum, the post discharge plan will include: a. A description of the resident's and family's preference for care; b. A description of how the residents and family will access and pay for such services; c. A description of how the care should be coordinated if continuing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), for two Residents (#94 and #26) out of a total sample of 29 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide assistance with meals as per the plan of care for Resident #94 and for Resident #26. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), dated 1/23/24, indicated Resident who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: a. Hygiene; d. Dining (meals and snacks). 1. Resident #94 was admitted to the facility in February 2024 with diagnoses that included dementia, adult failure to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to adhere to professional standards of care for the prevention of pressure ulcers for 1 Resident (#69), out of a total sample of 29 residents. Specifically, for Resident #69, who was assessed as being high risk for developing pressure ulcers, and has a history of pressure wounds, the facility failed to ensure the air mattress was functioning and set in accordance with the medical plan of care. Resident #69 was admitted to the facility in August 2021 and has diagnoses that include but are not limited to unspecified dementia, adult failure to thrive, bipolar disorder and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #69 scored a zero out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam, indicating he/she as having severe cognitive impairment. Further, the MDS indicated Resident #69 is dependent on staff for all aspects of care, is at risk for developing pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure for one Resident (#26), out of a total sample of 29 residents, that the Resident admitted with an indwelling catheter was assessed for removal of the catheter as soon as possible unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates continued catheter use is necessary. Findings include: According to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI): (A manual used to for the guidance for the Minimum Data Set assessment, which is required by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid recipients in skilled nursing facilities) -Indwelling catheters should not be used unless there is valid medical justification. Assessment should include consideration of the risk and benefits of an indwelling catheter, the anticipated duration of use, and consideration of complications resulting from the use of an indwelling catheter. Complications can include an increased risk of urinary tract infection, blockage of the catheter with associated bypassing of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that one Unit (A3) out of three units observed, had sufficient staff to meet the needs of the residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff were available to assist residents during the breakfast meal. Findings include: On 1/6/24 beginning at 9:00 A.M., the following observations were made during the breakfast meal at the A-3 resident care unit. Florida room: Staff including the maintenance director assisted with passing trays. There were 12 residents present for the breakfast meal and 2 staff present in the dining room. The 2 staff present were each seated with a resident assisting them to eat. Four other residents had not started eating and their breakfast was left on the table near them. At 9:10 A.M., one resident received his/her breakfast meal and after it was set up the resident used a fork, moved it around the plate and at no time ate the meal, and at no time did staff prompt or assist the resident to eat his/her meal until nearly 9:50 A.M. At 9:13 A.M., another resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, policy reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable mental, and psychosocial well-being for one Resident (#70) out of a total sample of 29 residents. Specifically, for Resident #70, the facility failed to ensure a psychiatric consult was completed. Resident #70 was admitted to the facility in September 2024 with diagnoses that included dementia with behaviors, restlessness and agitation, delirium, and insomnia. Review of Resident #70's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated he/she scored a 5 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating severe cognitive impairments. Further review of the MDS indicated the Resident is receiving antidepressant and antianxiety medications. Review of Resident #70's physician order, dated 9/7/24, indicated Counseling and Psychology Services PRN (as needed). Review of Resident #70's physician progress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a meals that were palatable and served at an appetizing temperature. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy and procedure, titled Dining Room Rounds, dated as revised November 5, 2024, indicated the following: Our facility audits the food services department regularly to ensure that resident needs are being met and that dining is a safe and pleasant experience for residents. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 2. The auditor will assess: b. Food temperatures on delivery and at end of service; e. Palatable presentation of food; During an observation of the breakfast meal on the A 3 unit, on 1/6/25 at 9:10 A.M., twelve residents were present in the Florida room. At 9:10 A.M., one of the first residents received his/her breakfast meal, the last resident was served his/her breakfast meal at 9:43 A.M., Forty-three minutes following the first breakfast meal delivered. During an interview on 1/7/25 at 11:26 A.M., Certified Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolated
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide or offer adequate snacks between meals. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Nutritional Snacks and Supplements, revised 12/24, indicated the following: Policy: Nutritional supplements are available and will be provided for all appropriate residents by the nursing staff. -Bedtime snacks will be offered daily. During the resident group meeting on 1/7/25 at 11:00 A.M., 5 out of 10 residents who are unable to independently obtain snacks from the kitchenette said they are not offered snacks after dinner and were not aware there were snacks available to them. During an observation on 1/8/25 at approximately 4:00 P.M., the kitchenettes on all units had a variety of snacks available for resident consumption. During an interview on 1/8/25 at 4:23 P.M., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #9 said snacks are given upon request from the residents. CNA #9 was asked if snacks are offered in the evening. She said we provide snacks to the residents that ask for them. During an interview on 1/9/25 at 8:11 A.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the nursing staff documented accurately in the medical record for two Residents (#2 and #19) out of a total sample of 29 Residents. Specifically, for Resident #2 and Resident #19 the facility failed to ensure nursing staff accurately documented which arm a blood pressure was taken. Findings include: 1. Resident #2 admitted to the facility in October 2021 with diagnoses that included chronic heart failure, chronic respiratory failure, diabetes, and hypertension. Review of Resident #2's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated he/she scored a 10 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating the Resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS further indicated that the Resident was receiving a diuretic (a medication that can be used to lower blood pressure). Review of Resident #2's physician order, dated 9/9/21, indicated no blood pressure on left arm (every shift for left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, for 3 Residents (#77, #85, #63), out of a total sample of 25 residents, the facility failed to develop care plans and obtain a physician's order. Specifically: 1. For Resident #77, the facility failed to develop a care plan for the use of psychotropic medication. 2. For Resident #85, the facility failed to develop a care plan for wandering behavior or to obtain a physician's order for the use of an electronic wander bracelet. 3. For Resident #50, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for weekly weights. 4. For Resident #63, the facility failed to develop a care plan for suicidal ideation. Findings include: 1. Resident #63 was admitted in April 2023 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/4/23, indicated Resident #63 scored a 3 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), signifying severely impaired cognition. Review of the active physician orders indicated Resident #63 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-17 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — pattern
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide behavioral health services, for one Resident (#23), out of a sample of 25 residents, and 7 residents out of the facility census of 109 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to offer and provide substance abuse services for residents with a history of substance abuse. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled 'Behavioral Health Services-Including Substance Abuse' dated November 2023 indicated the following: - It is this facility's policy that all residents receive the necessary behavioral health care and services, including substance abuse services, to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, psychosocial wellbeing, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. - Specialized services to provide appropriate person centered and individualized treatment for substance abuse disorders must be made available. Resident #23 was admitted to the facility in February 2023 with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than 5% when two out of three nurses observed made 12 errors out of 26 opportunities resulting in a medication error rate of 46.15 %. Those errors impacted three Residents (#266, #43 and #264), out of six residents observed. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medication, dated as revised March 2020, indicated the following: - Medications shall be administered in physician's written/verbal orders upon verification of the right medication, dose, route, time, and positive verification of the resident's identity when no contraindications are identified, and the medication is labeled according to accepted standards. - Medications should be administered within one (1) hour of the prescribed times. - Should a drug be withheld, refused, or given other than at the scheduled time, the individual administering the medication shall chart in the Electronic Medical Record (eMAR) and sign off for that particular drug and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly labeled in 2 of 4 medication carts and failed to ensure medications were properly labeled in 3 of 3 medication storage rooms. Review of the facility policy titled Storage, Labeling of OTC Medication, Destruction & Disposal of Medication dated and last revised November 2021 indicated but is not limited to: - To ensure that medications and biologicals are stored in safe, secure storage and safe handling. - No discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated medications should be available for use in the facility. All such medications are destroyed per policy. - Expired medications are to be removed from areas, medication carts prior to or at the time of expiration. - Drug containers having soiled, illegible, worn, makeshift, incomplete, damaged, or missing labels will be returned to the pharmacy for proper labeling before storing. - Medications requiring refrigeration should be stored in the refrigerator located in the drug room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview for one Resident (#51) of 25 sampled residents, the facility failed to provide a dignified existence. Specifically, for Resident #51, who was dependent on staff for care, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living care in privacy. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident Rights, dated as revised November 5, 2019, indicated the following: -It is the policy of this facility to respect the rights of the resident by providing comprehensive care with an approach aimed at maintaining dignity while respecting the core rights of patients and residents as outlined by the State Department of Public Health Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) and the Joint Commission of Healthcare Organization (JCAHO). Recognizing that society is dynamic and the rights of residents are continually evolving; we will strive to improve the quality of our care through a multi-disciplinary approach recognizing that each resident is an individual with unique needs.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-17 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to 1. obtain a psychotropic consent for two Residents (#63 and #98) and 2. update the psychotropic consents for one Resident (#75), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Findings include: 1a. Resident #63 was admitted in April 2023 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/4/23, indicated Resident #63 scored a 3 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), signifying severe cognitive impairment. Review of the active physician orders indicated Resident #63 is prescribed escitalopram oxalate (a psychotropic medication used to treat depression), 5 milligrams, one time a day. Review of the psychotropic consents failed to indicate there was a consent signed for escitalopram oxalate. During an interview on 1/17/24 at 8:03 A.M., the Director of Nursing said she could not locate the consent form but expected one to be signed in the chart. 1b. Resident #98 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and facility policy review the facility failed to initiate a grievance for 1 Resident (#66) out of a total sample of 25 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to initiate a grievance after Resident #66 had voiced a concern to the Psychologist regarding an allegedly consistently rude staff member. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Resident and Family Concerns and Grievances, revised 10/5/23, indicated, but was not limited to, the following: -The facility is committed to providing its residents with exceptional care and services. To ensure the continued provision of such exceptional care and services the facility and all owners, directors, officers, clinical staff, employees, independent contractors, consultants, and others working for the facility, have an established grievance process to address resident and family member concerns or dissatisfaction about the facility provision of care and services. -Filing of grievances: a. Residents or their family members, guardian, or representative may voice a grievance to the facility staff in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview for 1 Resident (#75) out of a total sample of 25 residents, the facility failed to follow a physician order to obtain a valproic acid level. Findings include: Resident #75 was admitted in March 2022 with diagnoses including dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/8/23, indicated Resident #75 scored a 3 out of a possible 15 points on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of the active physician orders for Resident #75 indicated Valproic acid level February and August, initiated on 5/17/2023. Review of the labs for Resident #75 failed to indicate that a valproic acid level was obtained in the month of August 2023. During an interview on 1/17/24 at 8:04 A.M., the Director of Nursing said she did not have proof that the valproic acid lab was ever obtained in August as ordered.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview for one Resident (#29) out of a total sample of 25 residents, the facility failed to provide the needed assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure assistance as needed was provided for eating and ambulation for Resident #29. Findings include: Resident #29 was admitted to the facility in July 2023 and has diagnoses that include dementia with agitation. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/11/23, indicated Resident #29 scored a 0 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS further indicated Resident #29 required staff set-up for eating and ambulated with supervision or touching assistance. Review of the most recent Monthly Summary Assessment, dated 1/2/24, indicated Resident #29 required assistance with mobility. Review of the current Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care plan indicated Resident #29 required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview for one Resident (#71) out of 25 sampled residents, the facility failed to assess and treat skin wounds. Specifically, the facility failed to assess wounds located on the toes of both feet. Finding include: Review of the policy titled Skin Prevention, Assessment and Treatment dated as revised 5/2/22, indicated: - CNAs should observe skin integrity during the daily provision of routine care and report any impairments to the charge nurse for appropriate follow-up. Treatment guidelines included: - Any skin impairments, including pressure ulcers, non-pressure ulcer wounds, surgical wounds, skin tears, abrasions, etc., should be assessed and documented weekly by the Wound Nurse, or designee, in the medical record. Interventions included: - Inspect skin daily for reddened areas or breakdown. - Upon identification of the development of a wound, the wound assessments/treatments will be documented in the medical record and start the Weekly Wound Log. Resident #71 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and observation for 1 Resident (#103) out of a total sample of 25 residents, the facility failed to implement an intervention to maintain nutritional status. Specifically, the facility failed to honor Resident #103's food preferences, and he/she experienced significant weight loss. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Weights Assessment & Interventions, dated as revised 1/19/22, indicated, but was not limited to, the following: -The threshold for significant unplanned and undesired weight loss/gain will be based on the following criteria (where percentage of body weight loss = [usual weight - actual weight] / [usual weight] x 100): a. 1 month - 5% weight loss is significant; greater than 5% is severe. b. 3 months - 7.5% weight loss is significant; greater than 7.5% I severe. c. 6 months - 10% weight loss is significant; greater than 10% is severe. -The Dietician (sic.) will assess resident nutrition, food preferences, food allergies, frequency of meals and cultural/religious preference on the initial and annual assessment.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement pharmacy recommendations for one Resident (#109) out of a sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to discontinue unused as needed medication in the physician's orders after the physician agreed with the recommendations from the pharmacist. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled 'Medication Monitoring and Management' with a revision date of January 2018 indicated the following: - If a medication seems unnecessary or harmful to the resident, either the Director of Nursing or consultant pharmacist may request the prescriber evaluate the continued need for the medication and/or consider reducing the dosage of medication. If the prescriber deems the medication necessary, a documented clinical rationale for the benefit of, or necessity for, the medication is documented in the resident's active record. Resident #109 was admitted to the facility in June 2023 with diagnoses including dementia. A review of the most…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement a 14 day stop date for an as needed (PRN) psychotropic drug for 1 Resident (#98) out of a total sample of 25 residents. Findings include: Review of the Center for Medicaid and Medicare (CMS) regulation for psychotropic medication use indicated the following: - §483.45(e)(4) PRN orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days. Except as provided in §483.45(e)(5), if the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believes that it is appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days, he or she should document their rationale in the resident's medical record and indicate the duration for the PRN order. Resident #98 was admitted in 10/2023 with diagnoses including depression and dementia. Review of the minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/6/23, indicated Resident #98 scored a 5 out of a possible 15 points on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) exam, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of the physician's orders indicated that on 11/29/23, an order for Lorazepam (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, policy review, and record review, for three Residents (#226, #43, and #264), out of a total sample of 25 residents, the facility failed to ensure they were free of significant medication errors. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medication, dated as revised March 2020, indicated the following: - Medications shall be administered in physician's written/verbal orders upon verification of the right medication, dose, route, time, and positive verification of the resident's identity when no contraindications are identified, and the medication is labeled according to accepted standards. - Medications should be administered within one (1) hour of the prescribed times. - Should a drug be withheld, refused, or given other than at the scheduled time, the individual administering the medication shall chart in the Electronic Medical Record (eMAR) and sign off for that particular drug and document a rationale. 1. Resident #266 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with diagnoses including diabetes, and Alzheimer's dementia. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview for one Resident (#29) out of a total sample of 25 residents, the facility failed to provide a therapeutic diet. Specifically, the facility failed to follow the physician's order for a regular, mechanical soft diet, that was chopped, advanced and bite size, for 6 of 6 meals observed resulting in an increased risk for swallowing complications. Findings include: The facility policy titled Therapeutic Diets, dated as revised 11/11/22, indicated: -A therapeutic diet must be prescribed by the resident's attending physician. The physician's diet order should match the terminology used by food services. -The food services manager will establish and use a tray identification system to ensure that each resident receives his or her diet as ordered. Resident #29 was admitted to the facility in July 2023 and had diagnoses which included dementia with agitation. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/11/23, indicated Resident #29 scored a 0 out…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled Employee Personnel Records (Certified Nurse Aide #1), the Facility failed to implement their policy and ensure that they or the Staffing Agency they contracted with, conducted a Massachusetts Nurse Aide Registry background check before hire, in accordance with the Facility Policy and the Staffing Agency Agreement. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy and Procedure titled Abuse Prohibition, dated 10/24/22, indicated the Facility will screen potential employees for a history of abuse, neglect, or mistreating residents to include checking with appropriate registries. Review of the Staffing Agency's contract, titled Managed Service Provider Agreement, dated 03/02/14, indicated the Agency would make available current copies of pre-assignment screenings. The Agreement indicated their Pre-Assignment Credentialing and Screening included to conduct background investigations that include conducting abuse registry searches. During the onsite investigation, the Facility, in communication with their Staffing Agency,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-01-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — widespread
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview for one Resident (#71) of 25 sampled residents, the facility failed to notify the physician of a significant change in status. Specifically, the facility failed to notify the physician that Resident #71 sustained skin wounds to the first and second toes on both feet resulting in a lack of medical examination. Finding include: Review of the facility policy titled Change in Condition Procedure dated as revised 9/21/23, indicated: The following guidelines will be utilized as appropriate to each situation and change in condition: 1. Full assessment by nursing staff including but not limited to: - Full vitals - Level of consciousness - Respiratory status - Abdomen - Functional status - Pain - Glucometer test if diabetic 2. Notify the MD of change and give assessment information. Receive orders, if any. Resident #71 was admitted to the facility in October 2020, and had diagnoses which included diabetes, dementia, epilepsy, and falls. Review of Resident #71's Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-01-17 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to inform 3 out of 3 Residents, or their representatives, of potential liability for payment for non-covered services including estimated cost of services. Findings include: The Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF/ABN) is a form which provides information to residents and/or their representatives so they can decide if they wish to continue receiving the skilled services they are receiving at the facility that may not be paid for by Medicare and assume financial responsibility. A record review of three Residents who had been taken off their Medicare Part A benefit indicated the facility failed to provide information to 3 out 3 Residents regarding potential liability on the SNF/ABN form. During an interview on 1/17/24 at approximately 10:00 A.M., the Director of Nursing said she is responsible for completing the ABN notices and has not provided financial liability on the form because these Residents were on Medicaid. The Director of Nursing said she was unaware that an estimate of financial liability needed to be provided to each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to STERN CONSULTANTS — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.2+0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FRIEDMAN, SHANAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST12%since 10/16/2023
BEATTY, BRITTANYIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/16/2023
FRIEDMAN, BENJAMINIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/16/2023
COM FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF10%since 10/16/2023
MILLMAN, CHAIMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/16/2023
NEWHOUSE, ERICIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/16/2023
ERBLICH, AVRAHAMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/16/2023
HERNANDEZ, AMANDAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/16/2023
SHEPS, BORUCHIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/16/2023
ETN FAMILY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/16/2023
TLCO HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/16/2023
GAUTHIER, SUSANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/16/2023
PLEW, ANDREAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/16/2023
ANDOVER MANOR PROPCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/16/2023
E NEWHOUSE FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/16/2023
T NEWHOUSE FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/16/2023
TLM FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/16/2023
STERN, BEZALELIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/16/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 40 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-9.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.4M
Related-party expense25% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 84%Medicare 5%Other / private 12%

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$367per resident / day
operating cost
$11,150per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$334per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Massachusetts
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,817/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225294. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next