Hoosier Health & Living Community

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 71 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 97 beds and averages 91.5 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.23 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.24 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.38 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-08-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food safely related to unlabeled and outdated foods, and failed to ensure proper sanitization of dishware related to dishwasher rinse temperatures and monitoring logs for 3 of 3 kitchen observations. This deficient practice had the potential to effect 85 of 85 residents that resided in the facility.Findings include:1. During the initial tour of the kitchen on 08/07/25 at 10:51 A.M., the following items were observed in the refrigerators: - a gallon sized plastic bag contained an open package of unsliced turkey. There was no label to indicate when the turkey was opened,- a small metal pan with several cooked slices of bacon laying on top of a thin layer of solid bacon grease. The pan was covered with plastic wrap and dated 07/27, and - two large, undated metal pans of bread pudding, covered with plastic wrap. During an interview, on 08/07/25 at 10:55 A.M., the Kitchen Manager (KM) indicated they sliced the turkey meat and used it for sandwiches; it should have been labeled when it was opened. The bacon…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately related to falls for 2 of 19 resident records reviewed. (Residents 8 and 83) Findings included:Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately related to falls for 2 of 19 resident records reviewed. (Residents 8 and 83) During an observation and interview, on 08/11/2025 at 9:42 A.M., Resident 8 was sitting in a chair in her room. The resident's walker was sitting nearby. She was alert and oriented and indicated she had recently fallen near the outside entrance to the facility while getting into a family member's vehicle to go to a doctor's appointment. She twisted her ankle when she fell. During an interview, on 08/11/2025 at 1:58 P.M., the Social Services Director (SSD) indicated the resident had fallen while getting into a family members vehicle who was taking the resident to an appointment. The family…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to administer As Needed (PRN) medications related to blood pressure values; and identify and address a resident's skin impairment for 2 of 19 residents reviewed for Quality of Care. (Residents 3 and 7)Findings include:1.The clinical record for Resident 3 was reviewed on 08/11/2025 at 2:22 P.M. An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/03/25, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension, diabetes, bipolar disorder, depression, stroke, and dementia. The physician's orders included, but were not limited to, the following: - - With a start date of 04/26/25 and a discontinued date of 07/31/25, the resident's blood pressure was to be assessed, twice a day. Staff were to assessed the resident's blood pressure upon rising, 6:00 A.M. to 10:00 A.M., and Before Bedtime, 7:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. If the resident's Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), the top number, was equal to or greater than 160, staff were to administer a PRN…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's wound was identified prior to the resident developing an unstageable pressure ulcer for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident 4) Findings include:The Clinical record for Resident 4 was reviewed on 08/11/25 at 11:19 A.M. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/28/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, coronary artery disease, diabetes, hypertension, and stage 3 chronic kidney disease. The resident required staff assistance for all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) except for eating. A mechanical lift was used for transfers. The resident had a specialty mattress for his bed and cushion for his chair. A Wound Management note, dated 07/29/25 at 10:42 A.M., indicated the resident had an Unstageable (a type of wound where the depth of tissue damage cannot be determined due to the presence of slough [dead tissue] or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide physician prescribed medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. (Resident 3)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 3 was reviewed on 08/11/2025 at 2:22 P.M. An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/03/25, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension, bipolar disorder, depression, stroke, and dementia. The resident's current physician's orders included, but were not limited to, dapagliflozin propanediol (Farxiga) tablet, 10 milligrams by mouth, once daily upon rising, with a start date of 05/20/25. The medication was documented as Not Administered on the following dates: - 05/27/25, Waiting on delivery from pharmacy,- 05/28/25, Waiting on delivery from pharmacy,- 05/30/25, Waiting on delivery from pharmacy,- 05/31/25, Drug/Item Unavailable,- 06/01/25, Drug/Item Unavailable,- 06/02/25, Drug/Item Unavailable,- 06/06/25, Drug/Item Unavailable, and- 06/10/25, Drug/Item Unavailable. During…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
  Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain a uranalysis and start treatment in a timely manner for 1 of 19 residents reviewed for laboratory services. (Resident 81)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 81 was reviewed on 08/12/2025 at 10:36 A.M. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/19/25, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The residents' diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension, non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety, depression, major depressive disorder, anxiety, and vascular dementia.A Progress Note, dated 06/25/25 at 9:05 P.M., indicated the nurses had received a call from the resident's physician's office. They had received the resident's urine dipstick results. They wanted a sample sent to the laboratory (lab) for a urinalysis (UA) culture and sensitivity (C&S). The nurse completed the paperwork and was waiting for the sample to send it to the lab.A Progress Note, dated 06/26/25 at 8:38 A.M., indicated the resident had hematuria and increased frequency of bladder incontinence with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's record accurately reflected current nursing measures or interventions for 1 of 18 residents reviewed. (Resident 68)Findings include:On 08/08/25 at 11:34 A.M., Resident 68 was observed in her room in her bed. The left side of the bed was against the wall. The bed was in a low position with a mat in place on the floor on the right side of the bed.On 08/11/25 at 3:25 P.M., the resident was observed in her room in bed. The bed was in a low position with a floor mat on the right side of the resident's bed. On 08/13/25 at 1:36 P.M., the resident was observed in her room in bed. The bed was in a low position with a floor mat on the right side of the resident's bed. During an interview, on 08/13/25 at 1:38 P.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 3 indicated she was familiar with the resident. The resident had the floor mat because she had fallen. Once she fell, they put her bed in the lowest position and placed the mat on the floor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide safe water temperatures for 10 of 18 resident rooms observed. (Rooms 114, 141, 142, 143, 310, 324, 325, 329, 330, and 343) Findings include: 1. During an interview and observation in Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] on 10/24/24 at 12:20 P.M., The resident indicated the water in his bathroom got hot. You couldn't keep your hand under it for very long. The water in the resident's bathroom sink was felt and found to be hot. The water stream was too hot to keep a hand under the water flow without discomfort. The water temperature was tested with a probe thermometer and was found to be 126.5 degrees Fahrenheit. The resident indicated he had not been burned by the water. On 10/24/24 at 12:49 P.M., the water in the Resident Room next door to room [ROOM NUMBER] (room [ROOM NUMBER]) was checked with a probe thermometer and the water temperature was found to be 126.9 degrees Fahrenheit. The following water temperatures were observed on 10/24/24,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident that self-administered medications was appropriately assessed for self-administration for 1 of 17 residents reviewed for self administration of medications. (Resident 18) Findings include: During and observation on 10/28/24 at 10:23 A.M., Resident 18 was sitting in his recliner in his room. His over the bed table was in front of him and he was finishing his breakfast. On the left side of the table sat a bottle of severe cold and cough syrup. During an observation on 10/28/24 at 1:06 P.M., Resident 18 was sitting in his recliner in his room. His over the bed table was in front of him. On the left side of table was a bottle of severe cold and cough syrup. During an observation and interview on 10/29/24 at 9:35 A.M., Resident 18 was sitting in his recliner in his room. His over the bed table was in front of him. There was a bottle of severe cold and cough syrup sitting on the table. The resident indicated he only took the medication when he had something caught in his throat. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain oxygen therapy equipment in a clean and safe manner and assess a resident during breathing treatments for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. (Resident 69) Findings include: During an observation and interview on 10/24/24 at 1:07 P.M., Resident 69 had a breathing treatment nebulizer machine sitting on her nightstand. The face mask was attached to the side of the machine and open to air. The face mask and the attached tubing were not dated as to when the equipment was put into use. No plastic bag or other breathing treatment equipment was visible in the general vicinity. The resident indicated they received breathing treatments for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). During an observation on 10/28/24 at 10:17 A.M., the breathing treatment nebulizer machine was sitting on the resident's nightstand. The face mask was attached to the side of the machine and open to air. The face mask and the attached tubing were not dated as to when the equipment was put into use. No plastic bag or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARDON & ASSOCIATES — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 82 rows in the source record cover these 40 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

16 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN