Arbor Trace Health & Living Community

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 196 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 72.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 150 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 101 beds and averages 96.9 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.30 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.51 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician notification of a 3-pound (lb.) weight gain over a 24-hour period for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for edema (Resident 9) and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis (Resident 50). The facility failed to ensure ACE wraps were applied as ordered for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident 11) The facility failed to administer creams to a skin impairment without compounding medicated creams for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for skin impairments (Resident 33). The facility failed to verify a urinalysis was reordered after the results of a probable contamination, ensure vancomycin was given as ordered, and had no verification of catheter care being provided for eight days after return from a hospitalization for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for urinary tract infection (Resident 58). Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 9 was reviewed on 5/13/24 at 1:37 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were clinically appropriate to self-administer medications for 3 of 3 residents randomly observed with medications at the bedside. (Resident 2, 9, and 22) Findings include: 1. An observation conducted of Resident 2's room, on 5/8/24 at 3:18 p.m., of a labeled bottle that contained benzocaine. Resident 2 indicated she utilized the benzocaine for her sore gums. An observation conducted of Resident 2's room, on 5/10/24 at 10:48 a.m., of a labeled bottle that contained benzocaine. There was also a bottle of nasal spray. Resident 2 indicated she took the nasal spray at night. Her jaw had been hurting for a while and the benzocaine did help. The clinical record for Resident 2 was reviewed on 5/10/24 at 12:17 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, herpes viral encephalitis, altered mental status, and mild cognitive impairment. There were no self-administration assessments for Resident 2's utilization of benzocaine and/or the nasal spray on 5/8/24. A progress note, dated 5/9/24 at 5:08…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a resident's preference for bathing frequency for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for choices. (Resident 24) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 24 was reviewed on 5/8/24 at 12:04 p.m. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to: dementia, mood disorder, psychotic disorder with delusions, and anxiety. She resided on a secured unit of the facility. The ADL (activities of daily living) care plan, last reviewed/revised 4/23/24, indicated Resident 24 was unable to independently perform late loss ADLs related to weakness and debility. The 10/19/22 care plan, last reviewed/revised 4/23/24, indicated Resident 24 was cognitively impaired and unable to voice preferences regarding ADLs (activities of daily living.) The goal was for her to have her needs met. An approach, with a start date of 10/19/22 and end date of 6/1/24, read, Resident unable to state bathing preference. To be offered shower, per facility shower schedule. Staff to observe for any indication that resident may prefer to have shower done at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and observation, the facility failed to promote a clean and homelike environment for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident 37) and 2 of 5 units reviewed for a clean and homelike environment. Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 37 was reviewed on 5/14/2024 at 1:22 p.m. The medical diagnosis included dementia with behaviors. An annual minimum data set assessment, dated 1/28/2024, indicated that Resident was cognitively intact. An interview and observation on 5/8/2024 at 11:45 a.m. indicated that the baseboard strip from the door to the kitchenette cabinets was missing. Resident 37 stated that it had been missing for a while. An observation on 5/8/2024 at 12:03 p.m. indicated that along the handrails on the 300 hall, debris was noted to include general debris in the inside corners of the handrails, paper wrappers from straws, a dead insect, and a paper clip. An observation on 5/9/2024 at 10:45 a.m. indicated a thumb tack inside the handrails on the 200 hall. An observation and interview on 5/10/2024 at 2:00 p.m. indicated the general debris in the 300…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of a resident's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis. (Resident 50) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 50 was reviewed on 5/13/24 at 10:22 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. A dialysis care plan, dated 2/14/24, indicated Resident 50 received hemodialysis due to end stage renal disease. A physician order, dated 3/13/24, indicated Resident 50 received dialysis. A Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/16/24, indicated no dialysis being marked. An interview conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 5/14/24 at 4:24 p.m., indicated the MDS Coordinator conducted the significant change MDS assessment due to Resident 50 starting dialysis. She was unsure why it was not marked on the MDS assessment.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop care plans for diabetic medications, antiplatelet medication, medication used to aid in sleep, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) medication for Resident 53, failed to implement a care planned intervention of care in pairs for Resident 53, and failed to develop a care plan for Resident 89's impaired communication. This deficient practice affected 2 of 24 residents reviewed for care planning. Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 53 was reviewed on 5/14/2024 at 1:20 p.m. The medical diagnoses included diabetes, congestive heart failure, insomnia, GERD, and restless leg syndrome. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 3/5/2024, indicated that Resident 53 was cognitively intact. A care plan, dated 12/14/2023, indicated that Resident 53 was to be a care in pairs for all care provided. An interview with Resident 53 on 5/14/2024 at 11:00 a.m. indicated that since yesterday when she raised a concern with her care that they have been utilizing care in pairs with her. She stated prior to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a transfer with utilization of a gait belt and the utilization of a Hoyer (mechanical lift) lift for 2 of 2 randomly observed residents (Resident 36 and Resident 71) and ensure fall interventions were in place for 2 of 7 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident 36 and Resident 62). Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 62 was reviewed on 5/8/24 at 12:20 p.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia. An interview was conducted with Family Member 21 on 5/8/24 at 2:24 p.m. He indicated Resident 62 fell about a month ago and fractured his pelvis. He was in his room around 2:00 p.m. and tried to get up and walk. The staff had told him many times to use his walker or wheel chair. The 4/18/24 post fall assessment indicated Resident 62 had an unwitnessed fall on 4/18/24 at 2:00 p.m. He was found in a supine position, outside of the bathroom door. Prior to the fall he was sitting in his wheel chair. The 4/18/24, 2:29 p.m. nurse's note read, Resident found on floor unable to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were followed-up with timely for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 22) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 22 was reviewed on 5/13/24 at 2:17 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, bradycardia, nasal congestion, and depressive episodes. A physician order, dated 7/13/23, was noted for Zoloft (antidepressant medication) 50 milligrams daily. A physician order, dated 2/14/24, was noted for Flonase nasal spray; 1 puff in each nostril daily as needed. The order was discontinued on 5/12/24. A pharmacy review, dated 11/16/23, indicated a gradual dose reduction (GDR) request for Resident 22's Zoloft. It was marked as agree for the Zoloft to be decreased from 50 milligrams to 25 milligrams. This recommendation was not implemented due to Resident 22 still receiving Zoloft 50 milligrams daily upon record review. A pharmacy review, dated 3/4/24, indicated the Flonase nasal spray to be scheduled for daily use. It was marked as agree to schedule…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained during incontinence care (Resident 3), ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) was donned prior to incontinence care for a resident on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) (Resident 3), and ensure hand hygiene in between residents during medication administration (Resident 68). Findings include: 1. An observation conducted of incontinence care for Resident 3 was conducted on 5/10/24 at 2:00 p.m. with Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 2 and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3. CNA 3 proceeded to remove Resident 3's incontinence brief due to soilage. CNA 3 performed perineal care by utilizing disposable wipes. CNA 3 proceeded to wipe from front to back of the perineum but utilized the same soiled wipe to wipe Resident 3 twice. CNA 3 placed the soiled wipes within the soiled brief and discarded such. CNA 3 took a tube a cream and applied the cream to Resident 3's coccyx area with the same gloves that were soiled from performing incontinence care. Both CNA 3 and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pneumococcal immunizations were offered and/or administered for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. (Resident 36 and Resident 11) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 36 was reviewed on 5/14/24 at 10:15 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease, cerebral infarction, and malnutrition. An immunization record, dated 12/1/21, was provided by the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) on 5/14/24 at 4:15 p.m. The document indicated the following immunizations administered: Pneumovax-23 (PPSV23) administered on 11/10/1997, & Prevnar-13 (PCV13) administered on 7/11/2017. An immunization consent form, dated 9/29/22, indicated consent was given for the influenza vaccine but not to the pneumococcal vaccine. Under the refusal column there was no indication of refusal for the pneumococcal vaccine. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/28/24, indicated the pneumococcal vaccine was not up…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARDON & ASSOCIATES — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 69 rows in the source record cover these 42 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

22 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $5.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 39% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN