Paoli Health And Living Community

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 101 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 79 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 109 beds and averages 81.1 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.49 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-01-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from sexual abuse by staff for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse allegations. (Resident C) This deficient practice resulted in an alert and oriented female resident alleging staff to resident sexual abuse on 12/28/24 when Resident C indicated that Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 13 lifted her gown during care and licked or sucked on her breast a week prior. CNA 13 indicated to a police detective on 12/21/24 that, she asked me to do it, so I done it, to shut her up. This Immediate Jeopardy began on 12/18/24 at approximately 4:00 P.M. when Resident C alleged that CNA 13 had lifted her gown and placed his mouth on her breasts. Resident C was tearful during staff interviews and indicated that she did not want the staff member to place his mouth on her breasts. On 12/21/24 local law enforcement placed CNA 13 under arrest after admitting the allegation. CNA 13 indicated to the police detective that he was assisting Resident C and she was flirting with him so he did it for like two…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-01-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from accidents for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for the use of a mechanical lift. A resident was in the process of transferring in a mechanical lift while the lift pad was wrapped under the resident's legs rather than through the resident's legs. The resident did not possess the required stability to transfer safely with the lift pad wrapped under her legs. The resident slid feet first out of the lift pad which resulted in multiple lower extremity fractures and a laceration to the back of her head. The resident was transferred to a local Emergency Department (ED) where she expired. (Resident D) This Immediate Jeopardy began on [DATE] at approximately 7:50 A.M., when Resident D fell 3.5 to 4 feet from a mechanical lift while being transferred by Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 6 and CNA 7. Resident D's fall resulted in a left femur fracture, left tibial fracture, right femur fracture, right ankle fracture, and a 3-centimeter (cm)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, sanitary, and homelike environment in 3 of 4 resident halls observed. Resident rooms contained used towels/washcloths on the floors, resident bed pans were stored uncovered in shared restrooms, resident toothbrushes were stored uncovered and unlabeled in shared restrooms, and odors were present 2 of 2 days during the survey. (100 hall, 200 hall, 300 hall, room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER])Findings include:1. During a review of the facility grievance log on 1/14/26 at 11:00 A.M., a grievance was filed on 12/18/25 that dirty laundry was left in a resident's room. 2. On 1/14/26 at 11:15, Hall 300 contained a urine odor. On 1/15/26 at 2:16 P.M., Hall 300 contained a urine odor. 3. During an observation on 1/14/26 at 2:30 P.M., the shared restroom in room [ROOM NUMBER] contained two resident toothbrushes, uncovered and unlabeled. On 1/14/26 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services. A resident received an incorrect dose of an ordered medication for three days for a total of four doses due to incorrectly transcribed physician's order. (Resident B)Finding includes:During review on 1/14/26 at 11:00 A.M., a facility reported incident, dated 1/2/26, indicated Resident B had admitted to the facility following a hospitalization and with an order for the medication metoprolol 25 milligrams (mg), give 1/2 tablet twice a day. During transcription from the hospital discharge orders to the facility medication administration record, the order was entered as metoprolol 25 mg one tablet twice a day. As a result, the resident received three doses of the metoprolol 25 mg tablet. During therapy, the resident became weak and short of breath. The hospital did keep the resident for observation. Record review on 1/14/26 at 2:00 P.M., Resident B's diagnoses included but were not limited to heart disease,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained during 3 of 4 observations of resident care. Staff failed to change gloves when completing a dirty task and prior to starting a clean task, failed to perform hand hygiene between glove uses, and failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions for a resident per the physician's order. (Resident C, Resident D, Resident F)Findings include:1. During an observation on 1/15/26 at 1:23 A.M., CNA 2 and CNA 4 provided incontinence care for Resident C. CNA 2 and CNA 4 removed a wet brief and provided perineal care while wearing gloves. CNA 4 then applied a new brief wearing the same gloves, then opened the top drawer of a bedside table and retrieved a tube of cream and applied the resident's peri-area. CNA 4 placed the tube back in the drawer, removed gloves, pulled new gloves from a pants pocket and put on new gloves without performing hand hygiene. CNA 2 and CNA 4 then pulled the resident up in bed and adjusted the resident's pillow before removing gloves and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-11 · tag F0623 — pattern
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a notice of transfer or discharge was given to residents or resident representatives for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalizations, and the ombudsman was not notified for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The transfer discharge form was not completed. There was no documentation of a resident, representative, and the ombudsman receiving a notice of transfer or discharge at the time of hospitalization. (Resident 15, Resident 56, Resident 48, Resident 41, Resident 231) Findings include: 1. On 4/9/25 at 9:03 A.M., Resident 15's clinical record was reviewed and indicated they were admitted from the facility to the hospital on 8/9/24 and returned back to the facility from the hospital on 8/13/24. Resident 15's clinical record lacked documentation of ombudsman notification for Resident 15's transfer. 2. On 4/8/25 at 1:29 P.M., Resident 231's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke (cerebral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-11 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurate for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, 1 of 2 residents reviewed for skin conditions, and 1 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents. Residents were taking an anticoagulant, antiplatelet, and anticonvulsant medications and a resident had falls that were not listed on the MDS assessments. (Resident 231, Resident 57, Resident 15, Resident 56) Findings include: 1. On 4/8/25 at 1:29 P.M., Resident 231's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke (cerebral infarction), hypertension (HTN), and congestive heart failure (CHF). The most recent Annual MDS assessment, dated 3/27/25, indicated Resident 231 was cognitively intact and did not take an antiplatelet or anticoagulant medication. Current Physician's Orders included, but were not limited to, the following medications: Aspirin (antiplatelet) 81 milligram (mg) tablet, give one tablet orally…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on residents that are complete and accurate for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for self administration of medications, and 2 of 4 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Two residents who self-administered medication did not have assessments documented. Ancillary services were not documented accurately for two residents. (Resident 10, Resident 66, Resident 44, Resident 64) Findings include: 1. On 4/8/25 at 10:54 A.M., Resident 10's clinical records were reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, Type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 10 was cognitively intact, was independent with eating and bed mobility, needed set up or clean up assistance with toilet use, and needed supervision with transfers. Physician's Orders included, but were not limited to, the following: Humalog KwikPen Insulin (insulin lispro) insulin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity concerns and one random observation. Staff leaned over a resident to provide care and remove a fitted sheet, a resident's hair was disheveled, food was observed on a resident's face, blood ran down a resident's neck and staff failed to wipe it off, a resident had a gauze dressing on her forehead that was not covered, water was observed on the bedside table of a (nothing by mouth) NPO resident, and staff indicated they would provide water with a mouth sponge to a resident and failed to provide it. (Resident 57, Resident 44, Resident 64) Findings include: 1. On 4/7/25 at 1:10 P.M., Resident 57's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but was not limited to, anemia, hypertension, and anxiety disorder. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/6/25, indicated Resident 57 was cognitively intact and had a skin tear. During an observation on 4/6/25 at 10:44 A.M., Resident 57 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a bed hold policy was given to residents or resident representatives for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The bed hold form was not completed. There was no documentation of a resident or representative receiving a bed hold at the time of hospitalization. (Resident 15, Resident 41) Findings include: 1. On 4/9/25 at 9:03 A.M., Resident 15's clinical record was reviewed and indicated they were admitted from the facility to the hospital on 8/9/24 and returned back to the facility from the hospital on 8/13/24. Resident 15's clinical record lacked documentation of a bed hold policy given to the resident or a representative at the time of the transfer. 2. On 4/8/25 at 10:03 A.M., Resident 41's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, malignant neoplasm of external lower lip and dysphasia. A progress note, dated 11/6/25 at 3:48 P.M., indicated Resident 41 was scheduled to leave the facility the following…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents requiring assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) received adequate assistance with bathing, nail care and oral care for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for ADL care. (Resident 44, Resident 64, Resident 14) Findings include: 1. During an interview on Monday 4/7/25 at 10:44 A.M., Resident 14 indicated she was supposed to get a bath on Monday and Thursday but didn't always get them. She indicated she couldn't remember the last bath she got but knew she didn't get one last Thursday. She indicated the aides would tell her they were too busy. On 4/8/25 at 10:32 A.M., Resident 14 was observed lying in bed. She indicated she did not get a bath the previous day (Monday). She indicated an aide had asked her if she would like a washcloth to wash her face and hands, but no one else had asked her that. On Thursday 4/10/25 at 11:00 A.M., Resident 14 was observed lying in bed. She indicated she had the same dress on since she had went to her doctor's appointment a week ago yesterday. She indicated she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided to a resident with an open skin area for 1 of 3 residents reviewed with skin conditions. Assessments including measurements and description of the area were not completed for an open skin area. (Resident 60) Finding includes: On 4/7/25 at 2:05 P.M., Resident 60's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus and depression. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/9/25, indicated cognition status could not be assessed, the resident required partial to moderate assistance (helper does less than half the effort) with toileting, bathing, and transfers, and no skin concerns were identified. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: Observe (to right hip/buttock) dressing to open area every shift for soil or dislodgement. Observe for signs and symptoms of pain or infection, dated 4/4/25. Observe (right upper thigh/buttock) every shift. Observe for signs and symptoms of pain or infection, dated 3/4/25.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$28,138 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $14,069 — penalty dated 2025-01-24
• $14,069 — penalty dated 2025-01-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARDON & ASSOCIATES — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 66 rows in the source record cover these 38 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

22 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $5.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 44% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN