University Heights Health And Living Community

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 130 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 45.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 75 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 176 beds and averages 125.0 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 51 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.52 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-05-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure follow-up for physician orders and instructions for care were obtained for a new positioning device (splint) following an off-site medical appointment for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for splints. (Resident 98) Findings includes: On 5/6/26 at 1:20 p.m., Resident 98 was observed sitting in a rocking chair in the activity room. Resident 98 was observed wearing a black positioning device (splint) on her left wrist. During an interview at that time, Resident 98 indicated she had worn the splint for a month or so. On 5/6/26 at 1:02 p.m., Resident 98's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnosis included, but was not limited to, a fractured carpal bone (small bone located in the left wrist). The fracture occurred on 2/20/26 as a result of a fall. The admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 2/19/26, indicated Resident 98 was severely cognitively impaired. A progress note, dated 2/20/26 at 6:01 p.m., indicated Resident 98 had sustained a fall while in the nursing facility and as a result fractured her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan for a resident's refusal of care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for skin breakdown. (Resident 100) Finding includes: During an observation on 6/2/25 at 11:00 a.m., Resident 100 was observed resting in bed and both feet were observed to be covered with non-skid socks. Resident 100 was not observed wearing Prevalon heel protection boots (specific boots designed with a cushioned bottom that floats the heel off the surface of the mattress helping to reduce pressure). No Prevalon heel protection boots were visible in the area. During an observation on 6/3/25 at 10:10 a.m., Resident 100 was observed resting in bed and both feet were observed to be covered with non-skin socks. Resident 100 was not observed wearing Prevalon heel protection boots. No Prevalon heel protection boots were visible in the area. During an observation on 6/5/25 at 9:35 a.m., Resident 100 was observed resting in bed and both feet were observed to be covered with non-skin socks. Resident 100 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the clinical record documentation was accurate for a resident at risk for skin breakdown who was prescribed heel protection for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for skin breakdown. (Resident 100) Finding includes: During an observation on 6/2/25 at 11:00 a.m., Resident 100 was observed resting in bed and both feet were observed to be covered with non-skid socks. Resident 100 was not observed wearing Prevalon heel protection boots (specific boots designed with a cushioned bottom that floats the heel off the surface of the mattress helping to reduce pressure). No Prevalon heel protection boots were visible in the area. During an observation on 6/3/25 at 10:10 a.m., Resident 100 was observed resting in bed and both feet were observed to be covered with non-skin socks. Resident 100 was not observed wearing Prevalon heel protection boots. No Prevalon heel protection boots were visible in the area. During an observation on 6/5/25 at 9:35 a.m., Resident 100 was observed resting in bed and both feet were observed to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure controlled medications were reconciled accurately for 4 of 8 medication carts. (200 Hall Medication Cart, 100 Hall Medication Cart, 400 Hall Medication Cart, 700/800 Hall Medication Cart) Findings include: 1. On 11/7/24 at 12:44 p.m., during the controlled medication reconciliation for the 200 hall medication cart, the Nurse's Narcotic Sign In/Out Sheet, dated 11/1/24 until 11/7/24 at 12:44 p.m., was reviewed. The document had a grid with lines that were numbered to correspond with each day of the month. There were spaces running across the grid for the nurse to write the number of controlled medication packets inside the cart at the beginning of the shift, the number of medication packets added or removed during that shift, and spaces for each nurse to sign once the medication packets and count sheets were reconciled. At that time, Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 1 indicated the document was for the nurses to keep track of how many packets of controlled medications were inside the medication cart. QMA…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) was used during a dressing change for a resident with an open wound on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for 1 of 1 residents observed for wound care. (Resident B) Findings include: On 11/7/24 at 8:39 a.m., Resident B's wound to the left heel was observed during wound care. The wound was approximately 5 centimeters (cm) by 5 cm, beefy red wound base with a scant amount of pink drainage and did not have any odor. The wound care was provided by RN 1 with the assistance from the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON and RN 1 applied alcohol based hand sanitizer to their hands and applied clean gloves but did not put on any other PPE. During an interview on 11/7/24 at 9:24 a.m., the DON indicated Resident B was on EBP and she and RN 1 should have put on a gown before providing wound care to Resident B. During an interview on 11/7/24 at 9:30 a.m., RN 1 indicated she was not sure if Resident B was on EBP. If Resident B was on EBP a physician's order would have been entered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-27 · tag F0554 — pattern
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure self-medication administration assessments were completed for 4 of 4 residents observed with medications at bedside. (Resident 53, Resident 1, Resident 105, Resident 39) Findings Include: 1. On 8/20/24 at 10:32 a.m., observed Resident 53 was sitting up in bed; no staff were observed to be in the room or in hallway. Resident 53 had an overbed table with the following observed to be sitting on top of the table; one clear plastic medication cup containing two small white tablets and one and a half large tablets. On 8/21/24 at 8:33 a.m., Resident 53 was observed sitting up in bed eating. A small plastic medication cup was observed sitting on the overbed table containing three small white tablets, two large white tablets broken in half, one orange tablet, and one peach colored tablet. On 8/21/24 at 8:40 a.m., Resident 53's clinical record was reviewed. The clinical record lacked a self-medication administration assessment. On 8/22/24 at 1:18 p.m., the Director of Nursing indicated that there was not a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0559 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice to a resident prior to getting a new roommate. (Resident 25) Findings include: On 8/22/24 at 8:45 a.m., Resident 25 was observed in her wheelchair in the hall way. The resident was moving around in her chair and fidgeting with her hands. She indicated she was very nervous. She indicated the facility had recently given her a new roommate. The new roommate was receiving hospice services and was actively dying. The resident indicated she was unaware that she was going to get a new roommate and was surprised. The new roommate passed away after seven days. I had to sit and watch her die for seven days. Resident 25 indicated she was not informed about getting new roommate until the day before the new roommate was admitted and that was only because they were making sure the room was clean. The resident did not receive a written notice about a new roommate. On 8/23/24 at 9:33 a.m., the clinical record of Resident 25 was reviewed. The diagnosis included, but was not limited to, depression. The clinical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was referred to the State-designated authority contractor for a Level II Screening (PASARR) for a new mental illness diagnosis evaluation for 1 of 1 residents reviewed. (Resident 53) Findings include: On 8/23/24 at 11:00 a.m., Resident 53's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnosis included, but was not limited to, bipolar disorder. On 12/9/21 Resident 53 received a new diagnosis of bipolar disorder. Resident 53 was not referred for a new Level II screening. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/3/24, indicated Resident 53 was cognitively intact. During an interview on 8/23/24 at 11:42 a.m., Social Service Director 3 indicated a PASARR Level II should have been done for Resident 53. On 8/23/24 at 1:21 p.m., the Director of Nursing Services (DON) indicated the facility followed the Indiana Guidelines for PASARR Level II assessments, which indicated a Level II PASARR evaluation is performed to identify the specialized needs of individuals with mental illness and intellectual…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide ADL's (Activities of Daily Living) for a dependent resident for 1 of 2 residents reviewed. A resident with facial hair was not assisted with shaving. (Resident 62) Findings include: During an observation on 8/22/24 at 9:14 a.m., Resident 62 was observed in bed with multiple one half inch gray hairs protruding from her chin. During an observation on 8/26/24 at 10:22 a.m., Resident 62 was observed in bed with multiple one half inch gray hairs protruding from her chin. During an observation on 8/27/24 at 9:00 a.m., Resident 62 was observed with multiple one half inch gray hairs protruding from her chin. During an interview at that time, Resident 62 indicated the staff had not offered to assist with the removal of the facial hair. She indicated she was not aware the hair was so long on her chin. During an interview on 8/27/24 at 9:05 a.m., the Director of Nursing indicated the facial hair for residents should have been removed during the residents shower days. On 8/27/24 at 9:34 a.m., Resident 62's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident diagnosed with edema and congestive heart failure received services and treatments for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for lower extremity edema. The facility failed to ensure daily weights, monitoring for side effects of edema, and that daily compression stockings were in place. (Resident 39) Findings include: During an observation on 8/20/24 at 12:15 p.m., Resident 39 was in her room sitting in her wheelchair eating lunch. Resident 39's uncovered left lower leg and foot were observed to be swollen. During an interview at that time, Resident 39 indicated the prescribed water pill (diuretic) did not work as well as it used to work which caused the lower leg and foot to swell. The resident indicated she did not wear compression stockings. During an observation on 8/21/24 at 8:30 a.m., Resident 39 was in her room sitting in her wheelchair eating breakfast. Resident 39's uncovered left lower leg and foot were observed to be swollen. During an observation on 8/23/24 at 11:39 a.m., Resident 39 was in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARDON & ASSOCIATES — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 74 rows in the source record cover these 43 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

23 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $7.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 39% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN