Morristown Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 129 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 56.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 60 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 108.8 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.75 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-01-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately notify a resident's physician of an x-ray result timely which indicated, the resident had sustained an elbow fracture from a fall that occurred days prior resulting in delayed treatment and a significant change in the resident's condition for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident 56) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 56 was reviewed on 1/20/23 at 11:57 a.m. Resident 56's diagnoses included, but not limited to, irritable bowel syndrome, congestive heart failure, weakness, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A nursing note dated 10/8/2022 at 5:18 p.m. indicated, she had received a phone call from Resident 56's roommate indicating, Resident 56 had gotten up out of bed, walked herself to the bathroom, slipped and fell. Upon arriving at the resident's room, Resident 56 was sitting on her bottom and when asked if she hit her head, she stated no. Resident 56 had a laceration noted to bilateral elbows and she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-01-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were present while a resident with a history of losing his balance and falling was toileting, resulting in the resident falling and obtaining a clavicle (collar bone) fracture; review a resident's fall during a collective Interdisciplinary Team meeting; and evaluate a resident's reported fall, per policy, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls, 1 of 1 resident reviewed for notification of change, and 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pain. (Residents L, 42, and 76) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 42 was reviewed on 1/18/23 at 12:30 p.m. The diagnosis for the resident included, but was not limited to, left and right above the knee amputation. The 12/4/22 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment for Resident 42 indicated he was cognitively intact. The functional status the resident was needing for toileting and transfers were extensive assistance of 2 staff persons. The fall care plan for Resident 42 dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have the interdisciplinary team (IDT) determine and document whether self-administration of medications was clinically appropriate for 1 of 8 residents observed during medication administrations. (Resident 52) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 52 was reviewed on 5/21/25 at 9:00 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/26/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A physician's order, dated 1/7/25, indicated the resident was to receive 400 milligrams (mg) of magnesium oxide twice a day. A physician's order, dated 11/5/21, indicated the resident was to receive 240 mg of diltiazem (blood pressure medication) once a day. A physician's order, dated 4/13/22, indicated the resident was to receive a calcium supplement once a day. A physician's order, dated 9/13/24, indicated the resident was to receive carboxymethylcellulose sodium eye drops once a day. A physician's order, dated 5/6/25, indicated the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was within reach for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for environment. (Resident 11) Findings include: On 5/20/25 11:18 a.m., an observation of Resident 11's room revealed as the resident sat in her wheelchair, her call light was not within reach as it laid across her bed. During an observation of Resident 11 in her room on 5/21/25 10:37 a.m., the resident's call light was between the wall and the resident's bed, not within reach, as she sat in her wheelchair. During an interview on 5/21/25 10:39 a.m., the Social Services Director (SSD) indicated Resident 11's call light should be within her reach. On 5/22/25 at 3:44 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated the facility did not have a policy specific to the use of call lights. 3.1-3(v)(1)

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely update a care plan with new interventions for behavior management for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dementia care (Resident 69). Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 69 was reviewed on 5/21/25 at 10:36 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with mood disturbance and paranoid mood disorder. A care plan, with a start date of 9/6/24 and last revised 5/6/25, indicated she had physically abusive behavioral symptoms and violent behaviors such as grabbing another resident's shirt and arm, and hitting staff during care. The goal was for her not to be physically abusive to other residents, visitors, and/or staff. The interventions, which were initiated on 9/6/24, included but were not limited to, administering medications as ordered by the physicians, avoid over-stimulation, convey an attitude of acceptance towards her, and divert her behavior by offering an activity. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, completed 3/10/25, indicated she was moderately cognitively impaired and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor the use of a non-invasive ventilator (NIV) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 11) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 11 was reviewed on 5/21/25 11:10 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and hypoxemia (low levels of oxygen in the blood). A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, completed 2/11/25, indicated Resident 11 was cognitively intact. A care plan, initiated on 11/18/2020, indicated Resident 11 had a diagnosis of sleep apnea and was at risk for respiratory difficulties or distress. The goal was for the resident to have no related complications through the next review related to sleep apnea diagnosis. Interventions included, but were not limited to, apply the NIV machine as ordered and to list settings, monitor oxygen saturation levels and apply oxygen as ordered, and contact physician as needed. A physician's order, dated 4/14/25, indicated the NIV to be applied at bedtime and instructed the use of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control was maintained by utilizing hand hygiene during medication administrations for 3 of 8 residents observed during medication administrations. (Resident 50, Resident 52, and Resident 85) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 50 was reviewed on 5/21/25 at 8:40 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, vascular dementia. An observation was conducted of a medication administration for Resident 50 with Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 2 on 5/21/25 at 8:40 a.m. QMA 2 was observed preparing the resident's medications at the medication cart. She had pulled all pill medications from the drawers and utilized scissors to cut the storage packaging of the pill medications. She then dropped the pill medications in a medication cup. During that time, she had donned gloves to touch a pill medication. After doffing her gloves, she crushed the pill medications; grabbed a spoon from a plastic storage bag and mixed the pill medications in pudding. She then administered the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper medication administration procedures were followed by preparing medications for more that one resident at a time during medication administration for 2 of 2 medications carts reviewed for the prepping of medications for multiple residents. (Facility) Findings include: An observation of the Pine and Juniper units medication carts was conducted on 4/18/24 at 7 p.m. The following was observed: 1. The Pine unit's medication cart was reviewed with QMA (Qualified Medication Assistant) 2. QMA 2 unlocked the medication cart and in the top drawer there two medication cups with medications in them. QMA 2 indicated, one of the medication cups contained medications for Resident Q but when she went to administer the resident her medications she was not available to take her medications. QMA 2 also indicated, the other medication cup with medications inside it were for Resident R. When asked how many residents at a time can they prepare medications ahead of time for she indicated, none. QMA 2 then identified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure controlled medications stored in the facility's locked medication storage drawer in the medication refrigerator inside the main medication room were labeled with an opened date and a label which at a minimum includes the medication name (generic and/or brand), prescribed dose, strength, the expiration date when applicable, the resident's name, and route of administration for 2 of 4 resident's medications reviewed for medication storage. (Resident C and P) Findings include: A medication storage observation of the facility's main nursing station medication room was conducted on 4/18/24 at 7:23 p.m. with DON (Director of Nursing). With the medication room was a medication refrigerator which contained a locked metal box which held controlled medications. Inside the locked controlled medication drawer the following was observed: 1. An opened box containing a multi-dose bottle of lorazepam (anti-anxiety medication) which had also been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident D) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident D was reviewed on 3/22/24 at 10:40 a.m. Resident D's diagnoses included, but not limited to, dementia and mood (affective) disorder (marked disruption in emotions; extreme highs/severe lows). An interview with Resident D conducted on 3/22/24 at 10:40 a.m. indicated she was going to be discharged from the facility on April 1, 2024. When asked why she was going to be discharged , she indicated she had been abusive to another resident. An interview with SSD (Social Services Director) conducted on 3/26/24 at 3:55 p.m. indicated Resident D was being discharged to another facility once her granddaughter had chosen one that is closer to her. When asked if Resident D's discharge was related to abuse, SSD indicated yes and Resident D had body slammed another resident to the floor then tried to deny that she knew anything about how the other resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely report a reportable incident for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident 94 and Resident E) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 94 was reviewed on 3/25/24 at 10:30 a.m. The diagnoses for the resident included, but were not limited to, dementia with psychotic disturbance and hallucinations. The resident was admitted on [DATE]. The 2/9/24 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment for Resident 94 indicated she was severely impaired. 2. The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 3/22/24 at 3:11 p.m. The diagnoses for the resident included, but were not limited to, dementia with psychotic disturbance and hallucinations. The 1/8/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment for Resident E indicated he was severely impaired. A reportable incident that was reported to the Indiana Department of Health was provided by the Clinical Specialist on 3/25/24 at 9:00 a.m. It indicated .Incident date: 2/27/24 Incident Time:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a reportable incident for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident E and Resident 94) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 94 was reviewed on 3/25/24 at 10:30 a.m. The diagnoses for the resident included, but were not limited to, dementia with psychotic disturbance and hallucinations. The resident was admitted on [DATE]. The 2/9/24 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment for Resident 94 indicated she was severely impaired. 2. The clinical record for Resident E was reviewed on 3/22/24 at 3:11 p.m. The diagnoses for the resident included, but were not limited to, dementia with psychotic disturbance and hallucinations. The 1/8/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment for Resident E indicated he was severely impaired. A reportable incident that was reported to the Indiana Department of Health was provided by the Clinical Specialist on 3/25/24 at 9:00 a.m. It indicated .Incident date: 2/27/24 Incident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARDON & ASSOCIATES — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 72 rows in the source record cover these 42 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

22 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $5.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 35% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN