Harbour Manor Health & Living Community

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 117 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 66 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 129 beds and averages 115.6 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.30 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.74 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-01-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from staff-to-resident abuse perpetrated by RN 2 when the nurse held the hands of a cognitively impaired resident and administered medications while the resident was screaming for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident B) Using the reasonable person concept, this abuse could result in Resident B feeling dehumanized and anxious related to their hands being physically restrained and being forced to take oral medications. Findings include: Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 1/2/25 at 9:13 a.m. Diagnoses included encephalopathy, anemia, hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, dysphagia, stage 4 chronic kidney disease, pain, and memory deficit. The most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/29/24, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. An 11/30/24 at 8:20 p.m. progress note authored by RN 2 indicated, while attempting to administer medications to Resident B, the resident became combative. The note indicated RN 2 sat on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-19 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a process to ensure the identity and competency of agency staff. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 122 of 122 residents in the facility. Findings include:During a confidential interview, on 5/18/26 at 11:43 a.m., it was indicated they were advised of a situation where CNA 8 was discovered to be working in more than one facility on the same date at the same time. They were able to contact both facilities and were provided with photographic evidence of CNA 8 and another employee, CNA 9, in different locations during this time frame. During an internal investigation, it was discovered that CNA 8 and CNA 9 had shared a staffing agency account and a banking account.A facility reported incident, provided by the Administrator on 5/18/26 at 11:45 a.m., indicated the following: On 5/8/26, a corporate payroll accounting discovered CNA 8 had worked the 2:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m. shift on 5/3/26 at one facility through an agency contract while also working the 6:00 a.m. - 10:00 p.m. shift on 5/3/26…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-19 · tag F0732 — isolated
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post current and accurate nursing staff information daily for residents, resident representatives, and/or visitors. Findings include:During an observation, on 5/18/26 at 9:00 a.m., the facility nurse staffing, dated 5/15/26 was posted on the wall across from the receptionist desk in the front lobby. The nursing staff posting, dated 5/15/26, included the following:Census: 116 Number of Registered Nurses (RN): Day shift hours: 24.00, Evening shift hours: 12.00, and Night shift hours: 16.00.Number of Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN): Day shift hours: 48.00, Evening shift hours: 36.00, and Night shift hours: 24.00. Number of Qualified Medication Aides (QMA): Day shift hours: 8.00, Evening shift hours: 16.00, and Night shift hours: 0.00.Number of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA): Day shift hours: 80.00, Evening shift hours: 64.00, and Night shift hours: 48.00.During an observation, on 5/18/26 at 9:34 a.m., the facility nurse staffing posting was updated. The updated staff post was dated 5/18/26 and included the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store drugs and biologicals in a safe and secure manner for 18 of 18 residents' treatments stored in the Rehab Hall treatment cart. Findings include:During a walk-through observation, on 5/18/26 at 9:45 a.m., the medication treatment cart on the Rehab unit was unlocked and unattended.During a continuous observation on 5/18/26 from 9:45 a.m. to 9:51 a.m., the medication treatment cart remained unlocked. During this time frame, the following were observed near the unlocked and unattended medication treatment cart: a housekeeping staff member, a laundry staff member and a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA).During a medication storage observation of the Rehab treatment cart, accompanied by LPN 5, on 5/18/26 at 9:51 a.m., following medications were observed:Two (2) tubes of zinc oxide (to protect skin) ointment,Four (4) tubes of 1% diclofenac sodium (to treat joint pain) gel,Two (2) tubes of nystatin (an antifungal) 100,000 units cream,One tube of 2% miconazole (an antifungal) cream,One bottle of 0.05% fluocinonide…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the safety of a cognitively impaired resident from potential harm by not providing supervision at an outside appointment for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed to accidents. (Resident B) Findings include:Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 2/12/26 at 11:00 a.m. Diagnoses included fracture of unspecified part of neck of right femur post-surgical repair, symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions following other cerebrovascular disease, repeated falls, hypertension, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, osteoporosis, and chronic pain. Review of the most current admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 1/6/26, indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, used a wheelchair for mobility, was frequently incontinent of bladder, occasionally incontinent of bowel and was impaired on one side in the lower extremities.Review of the hospital discharge orders, dated 12/31/25, indicated a follow up appointment with the orthopedic surgeon on 1/12/26.Review of the clinical record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure controlled substance inventory was accurately documented on individual narcotic record sheets per facility policy to mitigate risk for drug diversion for 6 of 6 residents reviewed during a medication storage observation. (Residents J, K, L, M, N, and O)Findings include:During an observation of the [NAME] 1 medication cart, accompanied by LPN 10 and LPN 11, on 2/12/26 at 1:49 p.m., LPN 11 indicated she did not document the removal of the controlled medications she administered that morning on the individual controlled medication inventory record sheets. Review of the individual narcotic sheets indicated the documentation had not been completed. LPN 11 indicated the [NAME] 1 medication cart contained medications for 18 residents, six of which received controlled medications from the cart. LPN 11 indicated she administered Resident J's pregabalin (anticonvulsant) 50 mg and hydrocodone acetaminophen (opioid pain medication) 5-325 mg the morning of 2/12/26.An observation during the interview indicated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a notice of transfer/discharge and a bed hold policy notification to the resident or resident representative for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. (Residents 5 and 15) Findings include:1. Resident 5's clinical record was reviewed on 12/4/24 at 9:27 a.m. Diagnoses included dysphagia following other cerebrovascular disease with a risk for malnutrition, iron deficiency anemia, other vitamin B12 deficiencies, and abdominal distention.A 8/27/25, annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact.A 4/22/25 progress note indicated Resident 5 had experienced multiple episodes of coffee ground-like emesis (vomit) and requested to be sent out to the emergency room.A 4/22/25, Resident Transfer Form observation note indicated the resident was transferred to the hospital for nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. The observation note was unsigned.A 4/22/25, discharge MDS indicated the resident discharged with a return anticipated.The clinical record lacked documentation that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow professional nursing standards for PICC (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter) line dressing changes to mitigate the risk for infection for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for IV (Intravenous) medications. (Resident 71)During an observation and interview on 12/3/25 at 10:21 a.m., Resident 71 was fully dressed seated upright in a specialty bed. There was an IV pole to the right side of the bed. Resident 71 indicated they had a PICC line and were getting IV antibiotics for a MRSA (methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus bacteria) infection. The staff provided the antibiotic medication on second shift around 7:00 p.m. every day. The PICC line was located on the right upper arm. The clear dressing covering the PICC line insertion site was dated 11/24/25.Resident 71's clinical record was reviewed on 12/4/25 at 11:54 a.m. Diagnoses included unspecified local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, fusion of spine cervical region and thoracic regions, and weakness.Current orders included the following:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required oxygen received services to ensure clean supplies and humidification to reduce side effects for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for oxygen. (Resident 110)Findings include:During an observation and interview on 12/1/25 at 3:30 p.m., Resident 110 was fully dressed and seated in the recliner beside the bed. He was wearing a nasal cannula. The oxygen tubing was undated. He indicated his oxygen was ordered at 3 liters per minute. On 12/2/25 at 10:36 a.m., Resident 110 was fully dressed and seated in the recliner beside the bed. He was wearing a nasal cannula. He indicated he could not recall the last time staff checked on his oxygen level or changed his tubing. He wears oxygen constantly. The oxygen concentrator was set to 5 liters per minute, and the water humidification bottle was empty. The sides and bottom of the water bottle were covered with a white discoloration resembling coarse salt. The oxygen tubing was undated.On 12/3/25 at 10:30 a.m., Resident 110 was fully dressed and seated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-02 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy when a staff member (CNA 1) failed to intervene when witnessing the abuse of a cognitively impaired resident (Resident B) by a staff member (RN 2) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: A facility reportable indicated on 11/30/24, CNA 1 reported that RN 2 displayed poor customer service with Resident B. RN 2 was suspended pending investigation and immediately left the facility. Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 1/2/25 at 9:13 a.m. Diagnoses included encephalopathy, anemia, hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, dysphagia, stage 4 chronic kidney disease, pain, and memory deficit. The most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/29/24, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. An 11/30/24 at 8:20 p.m. progress note authored by RN 2 indicated, while attempting to administer medications to Resident B, the resident became combative. RN 2 sat on the resident's bed, held the resident's hands, and put the medication in the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow a care plan intervention of providing care with staff pairs to protect the resident from anxiety related to allegations of inappropriate care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident C) Findings include: During an interview on 1/2/25 at 9:35 a.m., Resident C indicated, on 12/26/24 during the night shift, CNA 3 touched him inappropriately during incontinence care. The resident reported the incident to other facility staff. Resident C's clinical record was reviewed on 1/2/25 at 9:39 a.m. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, pain, abdominal aortic aneurysm-without rupture, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy and hyperosmolarity, depressive disorder, and dysphagia following cerebral infarction. Review of the most current quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/5/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A current CNA Assignment Sheet, care plan dated 4/28/23, indicated an intervention for care in pairs, initiated 11/7/23 due to resident behaviors as evidenced by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARDON & ASSOCIATES — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 71 rows in the source record cover these 42 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

22 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $4.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN