Carmel Health & Living Community

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 93 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 59 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 188 beds and averages 138.9 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 49 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.01 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.84 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received supervision during incontinence care to prevent the resident from being rolled off the bed onto the floor for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident B) This deficient practice resulted in Resident B being hospitalized with an eight-millimeter frontal subdural hematoma.Findings include:During an interview, on 11/12/25 at 2:31 p.m., a family member of Resident B indicated she received a telephone call, on 10/1/25 at 6:00 a.m., Resident B had rolled out of bed when an aide was in the room. Typically, there were two staff members with her when care was provided due to Resident B's weight. She did not know where the other person was at the time of the fall. The resident was admitted to the hospital with a traumatic brain injury and bleeding on the brain.The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 11/13/25 at 11:50 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction which affected the left non-dominant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-09-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from a significant medication error for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for medication errors. (Resident 7) This deficient practice resulted in Resident 7 being hospitalized for toxic metabolic encephalopathy due to a high dose of medication and her end stage renal disease.Findings include:During an interview, on 9/24/25 at 11:52 a.m., Resident 7 indicated she went to the hospital after receiving medication which caused her to see things that were not there. She did not remember a lot about the occurrence, but her daughter became very concerned and insisted she be sent to the hospital.The clinical record for Resident 7 was reviewed on 9/23/25 at 1:17 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease, dependent on renal dialysis, toxic encephalopathy, zoster without complications, and adverse effect of drug medication.A care plan, dated 9/9/22, indicated Resident 7 received hemodialysis due to end stage renal disease.A nursing progress note, dated 7/4/25 at 11:56 a.m.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure narcotic reconciliation was documented as completed, medications were available without interruptions in administration, and to ensure accurate administration documentation and destruction by obtaining two nurse's signatures for 3 of 3 medication carts (500 Unit, 700-1 Unit, 800 Unit) and 2 of 2 residents (Resident 138 and 55) reviewed for pharmacy services.Findings include:1. A facility narcotic reconciliation document, for the 500 Unit, was missing signatures to indicate the narcotic reconciliation was completed on 9/10/25 for the on-coming night shift, on 9/13/25 for the on-coming night shift, on 9/15/25 for the on-coming and off-going evening shift, and on 9/17/25 for the on-coming night shift. During an interview, on 9/23/25 at 8:27 a.m., LPN 6 indicated the nurses were to sign on/off on the narcotic count sheet every shift. 2. A facility narcotic reconciliation document, for the 700-1 Unit, was missing signatures to indicate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were dated when opened, were stored in the original pharmacy packaging, and a medication administration record matched the pharmacy label for a narcotic pain medication for 3 of 5 medication carts (500 Unit, 300 Unit and 700 Unit), 1 of 3 medication storage refrigerators (300 Unit), and 1 of 1 resident (Resident 55) reviewed for drug labeling and storage.Findings include:1. During an observation, on 9/23/25 at 8:17 a.m., with LPN 5 in attendance, the 500 Unit medication cart was found to have the following: a. One 30 milliliter (ml) bottle of morphine with approximately 15 ml left was found without an open date. b. Two 30 ml bottles of morphine with approximately 16 ml left in both bottles were found without an open date. One bottle had a damaged label. 2. During an observation, on 9/23/25 at 11:23 a.m., with LPN 7 in attendance, the 300 Unit medication cart was found to have the following: a. In the drawer of the cart was a clear plastic pouch with the name and room number of Resident 3…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team (IDT) determined self-administration of medications was clinically appropriate and notation of the determinations were documented in the resident's medical record and care plan for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for self-administration of nebulizer treatments. (Resident 113)Findings include:During an observation and interview, on 9/19/25 at 9:54 a.m., Resident 113 was observed to be in her room. She had a nebulizer machine with fluid in the nebulizer medicine cup. Resident 113 indicated the nebulizer was set up for her and she forgot to do it. The clinical record for Resident 113 was reviewed on 9/19/25 at 10:04 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pneumonia, and generalized anxiety disorder.A physician's order, dated 7/8/25, indicated to administer 3 milliliters of albuterol sulfate 2.5mg/3mL (0.083 %) solution via inhalation upon rising between 7:00 a.m. and before bedtime between 6:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m.The resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure blood pressure medications were held according to the physician's orders for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident 13 and 96)Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident 13 was reviewed on 9/22/25 at 3:09 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypotension (low blood pressure), repeated falls, weakness, unsteadiness on feet, hypertensive heart disease without heart failure, and essential primary hypertension. A physician's order, dated 6/3/25, indicated to administer midodrine (a medication used to raise blood pressure) 5 milligrams (mg) every 8 hours with special instructions to hold the medication for a systolic blood pressure greater than 140. A Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated August 2025, indicated the midodrine was administered with systolic blood pressure greater than 140 on the following dates and times:On 8/3/25 at 8:00 a.m., with a systolic blood pressure of 152.On 8/17/25 at 4:00 p.m., with a systolic blood pressure of 142. On 8/27/25 at 4:00 p.m.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen and nebulizer tubing lines were dated and a physician order was in place for the use of oxygen for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 12, 113 and 138)Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 9/18/25 at 10:21 a.m., Resident 12 was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula. The oxygen line did not have a date to show when it was last changed. The resident had a nebulizer machine on a gray plastic dresser. The nebulizer was not in use, and the mask was observed to be stored next to the machine and not in a storage bag. The clinical record for Resident 12 was reviewed on 9/24/25 at 3:23 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cough, and age-related debility. A physician's order, dated 9/15/23, indicated to change and date the oxygen tubing, humified bottle, and the nebulizer tubing every week on Sunday and as needed. During an interview, on 9/18/25 at 10:28 a.m., QMA 4 indicated the oxygen line, and the nebulizer line…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an active physician's order for hemodialysis and monitoring before and after dialysis was obtained for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis. (Resident 7)Findings include:During an observation, on 9/19/25 at 9:39 a.m., Resident 7 was not in her room, and a staff member indicated the resident had gone to dialysis.During an observation, on 9/22/25 at 9:10 a.m., Resident 7 was not in her room, and a staff member indicated the resident had gone to dialysis.During an observation and interview, on 9/24/25 at 11:52 a.m., Resident 7 was in her room and had just finished eating her lunch after returning from dialysis. She indicated she had been receiving dialysis for a few years.The clinical record for Resident 7 was reviewed on 9/23/25 at 1:17 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease (ESRD), chronic kidney disease stage 3, and dependence on renal dialysis.A care plan, dated 9/9/22, indicated Resident 7 received hemodialysis due to end stage renal disease.A physician's order,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the diagnosis used supported the adequate indications for use of the medication for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 3 and 11)Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident 3 was reviewed on 9/22/25 at 11:18 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, constipation, anxiety disorder, and pain. A physician's order, dated 8/19/25, indicated to administer sennosides-docusate sodium (a medication used for constipation) tablet twice a day for unsteadiness on feet. A pharmacy Medication regimen review, dated 8/26/25, indicated Resident 3's medications were reviewed by the pharmacist with no recommendations. During an interview, on 9/24/25 at 10:21 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) reviewed Resident 3's medication orders and indicated the medication sennosides-docusate sodium did not have the correct supporting diagnosis. During an interview, on 9/24/25 at 10:36 a.m., Clinical Support Nurse 2 indicated the pharmacy reviewed medications, allergies, diagnoses, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a staff member followed the policy and procedure when administering narcotics for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services. (Resident F and G) Finding includes: A document, titled Indiana State Department of Health Survey Report System, dated 12/18/24 at 9:01 a.m., indicated Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 5 reported to the facility a concern with RN 1. RN 1 was potentially taking residents' narcotic medications due to her signing the narcotic medications out in the count book but not documenting the administration of those narcotic in the residents' medical records. An investigation was initiated, and all the residents' narcotic medications were accounted for, and no discrepancies were found. RN 1 was terminated due to failure to follow facility policy and procedure. The following residents' medical records were reviewed, and their Electronic Medication Administration Record (EMAR) did not have the narcotic medication documented for the dates and times the narcotic count sheet indicated the medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed physician's orders to hold medications, administer as needed (prn) medications according to the parameters, obtain daily weights, and failed to communicate with a urologist and a hospice provider for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Residents G, H, F, 33 and 105) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident G was reviewed on 10/30/24 at 11:05 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus, essential primary hypertension, anxiety disorder, recurrent major depressive disorder, and moderate vascular dementia with psychotic disturbance. A care plan, dated 7/14/22 and edited 9/9/24, indicated the resident had the potential for hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, and diabetic complications. The interventions included, but were not limited to, administer accuchecks and any insulin coverage per physician's order. A physician's order, dated 6/8/23, indicated to give 8 units of Humalog U-100…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-04 · tag F0576 — isolated
  Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure mail was delivered unopened for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for resident rights. (Resident 135) Finding includes: During a resident council interview, on 10/30/24 at 1:05 p.m., Resident 135 indicated an item of her mail from Medicaid had been opened by the facility prior to being delivered. She indicated she had not given permission and did not want anyone from the facility to open her mail. The clinical record for Resident 135 was reviewed on 10/30/24 at 3:08 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral palsy, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic viral hepatitis, atherosclerotic heart disease, and noninfective gastroenteritis and colitis. Resident 135 signed a Permission & Acknowledgment form, on 9/30/24 at 7:20 p.m. She selected NO to I authorize community personnel and/or volunteers to open the resident's mail and read it to the resident at times the resident is unable to do so and NO to If the resident applies for Medicaid, I authorize the designated community personnel to open the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,015 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,015 — penalty dated 2025-11-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARDON & ASSOCIATES — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 72 rows in the source record cover these 45 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

25 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $5.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 28% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN