Terrace At Solarbron The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 138 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 72 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 91 beds and averages 77.3 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.70 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-10-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a sit to stand lift was used according to facility policy for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for falls. This deficient practice led to a fall with a fracture requiring hospitalization and surgical repair. (Resident M) Finding includes: During a confidential interview on 10/24/23 at 11:13 A.M., it was indicated that a CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) dropped Resident M while using a sit to stand lift resulting in a broken ankle. On 10/25/23 at 10:19 A.M., Resident M's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, unspecified fracture of shaft of right femur. The most recent quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 9/25/23, indicated Resident M had moderate cognitive impairment, had no falls since the prior assessment, and required assistance of 2 staff for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, and bathing. The quarterly MDS Assessment completed prior to the resident's fall, dated 1/17/23, indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, had no falls since the prior…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-03 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications for 6 of 6 residents reviewed for as needed (PRN) antianxiety medications. Residents' PRN antianxiety medication orders did not indicate a specific duration of use. (Resident 7, Resident G, Resident 2, Resident 81, Resident 6, and Resident B)Finding includes:1.On 2/26/26 at 11:16 A.M., Resident 7's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anxiety disorder. The most current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 12/23/25, indicated Resident 7 was cognitively intact and received an antianxiety medication during the 7-day lookback period. A current anxiety disorder care plan, dated 11/13/25, indicated Resident 7 required the use of an antianxiety medication. Physician orders included, but were not limited to:lorazepam (an antianxiety medication) 0.5 milligrams (mg) - Give one tablet by mouth twice a day as needed for anxiety, dated 6/10/25. The order was listed as open ended and did not include a stop date. The December 2025,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement care plans for 3 of 6 residents reviewed for falls and 3 of 6 residents reviewed for medication administration. A care plan was not developed for residents' who received anticonvulsants, antidepressants and antianxiety medications, and care plan interventions were not implemented to prevent falls. (Resident 9, Resident 30, Resident B, Resident 40, and Resident 81)Findings include: 1. On 2/24/26 at 11:30 A.M., Resident 9 was observed lying in bed without a call don't fall sign in the room. On 2/25/26 at 1:29 P.M., Resident 9's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, depression, dysphagia, and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. The current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 1/20/26, indicated Resident 9 was cognitively intact. Resident 9 took an antidepressant and anticonvulsant during the 7-day lookback period and had no history of falls until 1/9/26. Current physician orders included but were not limited to:Gabapentin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored properly for 3 of 3 medication carts observed and 1 of 2 medication storage rooms observed. Medication carts contained loose medications, and a medication storage room refrigerator door was not closed. (100 Hall, 300 Hall, Memory Care Unit)Findings include:1. During an observation of the 300 Hall medication cart on 3/3/26 at 11:50 A.M., the third drawer down contained one loose tablet, the fourth drawer down contained one loose tablet, and the sixth drawer down contained one loose capsule. During an interview on 3/3/26 at 11:55 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 6 indicated being uncertain what the tablet from the third drawer was. The tablet from fourth drawer appeared to be allopurinol 100 milligrams (mg), and capsule from the sixth drawer appeared to be carbamazepine 200 mg. LPN 6 indicated it was the responsibility of the nurse on the cart to ensure the cart remained organized and that the night shift nurse typically cleaned the cart.2. During an observation of the Memory…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure code status was clearly indicated for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for advanced directives. (Resident 30, Resident 46) Findings include: 1. On [DATE] at 1:30 P.M., Resident 46's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, vomiting, unspecified, lack of coordination, and abnormalities of gait and mobility.The current 5-day scheduled Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 46 was cognitively intact and required setup assistance for eating and partial to moderate assistance of staff (staff does less than half the effort) for transferring. The code status on the resident profile dashboard listed Resident 46 as a full code. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to:Code Status: Do Not Resituate (DNR), dated [DATE]. The clinical record lacked a signed Advance Directive document for DNR.The current preferences care plan indicated that the resident had requested a DNR code status,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments were completed accurately for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. An anticonvulsant medication was not marked as received. (Resident 40)Finding includes: On 2/25/26 at 9:37 A.M., Resident 40's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, bipolar disease.The most current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 11/17/25, indicated Resident 40 had severe cognitive impairment and did not receive an anticonvulsant during the 7-day lookback period (11/11/25 - 11/17/25).Physician orders included, but were not limited to:oxcarbazepine (an anticonvulsant medication) 150 milligrams (mg) - Give 150 mg tablet with 600 mg tablet to equal 750 mg twice a day upon rising and before bedtime for bipolar disorder, dated 12/8/25oxcarbazepine 600 mg - Give 600 mg tablet with 150 mg tablet to equal 750 mg twice a day upon rising and before bedtime for bipolar disorder, dated 12/8/25Discontinued physician orders included, but were not limited…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised following changes in residents' conditions for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for wounds, 1 of 1 residents reviewed for behaviors, and 1 of 6 residents reviewed for falls. Care plans were not revised following deterioration of a wound, physically aggressive behavior events, and falls. (Resident C, Resident G, and Resident B)Findings include: 1. A record review on 2/24/26 at 10:30 A.M., indicated Resident C's diagnoses included, but were not limited to paraplegia, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, and unspecified dementia. Resident C's most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 7/24/25, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility with one unhealed Stage II pressure ulcer, was at risk for developing pressure ulcers, had moderate cognitive impairment, and was dependent on staff for mobility, including rolling right to left in bed. Resident C's physician orders included, but were not limited to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide care to prevent a urinary tract infection and follow physician orders to treat a urinary tract infection (UTI) for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for active urinary tract infections. Staff did not perform proper hand hygiene while providing incontinence care to a resident with a current UTI and staff did not administer antibiotics as ordered for the active UTI. (Resident B) Finding includes: On 2/25/26 at 1:54 P.M., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 12/3/25, indicated Resident B was severely cognitively impaired, required set-up assistance from staff for eating, toileting, and transfers, and required supervision assistance from staff for bathing. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: Macrobid (an antibiotic medication) capsule 100 mg (milligrams) one capsule twice a day for five days; Start date 2/27/26 The care plan included, but was not limited to: (Resident)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's Nasal Jejunal (NJ) feeding tubing was monitored for correct placement for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for a feeding tube. (Resident 96)Finding includes:On 2/26/26 at 8:15 A.M., Resident 96 was observed lying on her right side with the NJ tube noted lying flat alongside the resident with the pink marker of the tube hanging out of left nares one inch. The nasal [NAME] endings were knotted underneath the distal part of the marker. On 2/25/26 at 2:28 P.M., Resident 96's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dysphagia following other cerebrovascular disease, Gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, and borderline personality disorder. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment was still being processed. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to:Glucerna 1.5 Pump Rate: 50 milliliters per hour (mL / hr)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an attempt for management of pain was provided for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls resulting in fracture. (Resident B) Finding includes: On 2/25/26 at 1:54 P.M., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, urinary tract infection and fracture of left femur. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 12/3/25, indicated Resident B was severely cognitively impaired, required set-up assistance from staff for eating, toileting, and transfers, and required supervision assistance from staff for bathing. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: hydrocodone-acetaminophen (a narcotic pain medication) tablet 5-325 mg (milligrams) one tablet every six hours as needed for pain; Start date 2/23/26 acetaminophen (pain medication) capsule 325 mg two tablets by mouth every four hours as needed; Start date 2/23/26 Resident pain observation reveals: M=Pain level is manageable this shift, P=Pain level is not manageable this shift. pain rating per…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff monitored for side effects of high-risk medications for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Anticonvulsant and antidepressant medication side effects were not monitored. (Resident 40 and Resident 9)Findings include: 1. On 2/25/26 at 9:37 A.M., Resident 40's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, bipolar disorder. The most current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 11/17/25, indicated Resident 40 had severe cognitive impairment and did not receive an anticonvulsant during the 7-day lookback period (11/11/25 - 11/17/25). Physician orders included, but were not limited to:oxcarbazepine (an anticonvulsant medication) 150 milligrams (mg) - Give 150 mg tablet with 600 mg tablet to equal 750 mg twice a day upon rising and before bedtime for bipolar disorder, dated 12/8/25 oxcarbazepine 600 mg - Give 600 mg tablet with 150 mg tablet to equal 750 mg twice a day upon rising and before bedtime for bipolar disorder, dated 12/8/25 The clinical record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARDON & ASSOCIATES — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 39 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 26% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN