Copper Trace Health & Living Community

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 252 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 45.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 135 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 104 beds and averages 99.3 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.75 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an orthopedic surgeon was notified when the frequency of a resident's narcotic pain medication was changed, when the resident's condition failed to improve, and when the resident had continued complaints of pain following a right hip surgery for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for notification. (Resident B) This deficient practice resulted in Resident B experiencing continued pain for two weeks related to a dislocated hip after a hemiarthroplasty (a surgical procedure which replaces only one half of a joint-the ball while leaving the socket) of the right hip. Findings include:During a telephone interview, on 3/16/26 at 11:39 p.m., Resident B's family member 8 indicated the resident was in severe pain every time she was moved by staff from the day she was admitted to the facility, to the day she had her follow-up appointment with the orthopedic surgeon. Resident B yelled out Ouch, Ouch, Ouch whenever the staff moved her. The facility staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments were completed according to the policy and weights were obtained and documented in the clinical record for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident 42 and 6)Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident 42 was reviewed on 12/15/25 at 11:29 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and dementia.A physician's order, dated 5/10/25, indicated to administer olanzapine (an atypical antipsychotic medication) 10 milligrams (mg) one time a day.A care plan, dated 5/6/25, indicated to complete a routine AIMS observation.An Abnormal Involuntary Movement (AIMS) assessment (used to detect, track, and measure the severity of involuntary movements in patients on antipsychotic medications) was completed on 5/9/25.An AIMS assessment was completed on 12/16/25.There was a greater than 6-month lapse between completing the AIMS assessments.During an interview, on 12/16/25 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure consents were obtained and the ability to safely use an enabler bar for bed mobility and transfers assessments were completed for 2 of 7 residents reviewed for accident hazards. (Resident 115 and 11)Findings include:1. During an observation, on 12/11/25 at 12:03 p.m., Resident 115 was in bed and had bilateral grab bars. During an observation, on 12/12/25 at 2:02 p.m., Resident 115 was in bed and had bilateral grab bars. During an observation, on 12/15/25 at 10:04 a.m., Resident 115 was in bed and had bilateral grab bars. During an observation, on 12/16/25 at 10:32 a.m., Resident 115 was in bed and had bilateral grab bars. The clinical record for Resident 115 was reviewed on 12/12/25 at 2:31 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, difficulty in walking, insomnia, memory deficit following cerebrovascular disease, mild dementia with mood disturbance, speech and language deficits following cerebrovascular disease, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication was available and administered as ordered by the physician for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. (Resident 116)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 116 was reviewed on 12/16/25 at 10:57 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease, difficulty walking, unsteadiness on feet, orthostatic hypotension, and memory deficit. A physician's order, dated 12/6/25, indicated to administer two (2) Rytary (an extended-release medication used to treat symptoms of Parkinson's disease) 61.25-245 milligram (mg) capsules three (3) times a day.A prescription order report sent to the pharmacy indicated the new electronic prescription order was sent successfully on 12/6/25 at 5:40 p.m.A physician's history and physical, dated 12/10/25, indicated the resident was admitted for rehabilitation and care after a fall related to the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia. The plan was to continue the home dosing of Rytary 61.25-245 mg three (3) times a day. A current…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled and dated and insulin was removed and discarded after 28 days in 2 of 4 medications carts reviewed for medication storage. (Ambassador Cart 1 and Heritage Cart 1)Findings include:1. During an observation, on [DATE] at 10:14 a.m., with LPN 2, the Heritage medication cart 1 had the following:a. One (1) Novolog insulin pen which was opened and not dated. There were 200 of 250 units left in the insulin pen.b. One (1) Basaglar insulin pen which was opened and dated [DATE].c. A bubble pack of Tramadol 50 milligrams (a controlled substance pain relieving medication) was found to have open packaging at the number two dose. During an interview, on [DATE] at 10:14 a.m., LPN 2 indicated the Novolog insulin should have had an open date. The Basaglar insulin pen was only good for 30 days. The Norco pill should have been removed and discarded. 2. During an observation, on [DATE] at 8:42 a.m., with LPN 3, the Ambassador…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-28 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was discharged to a location which met the resident's needs and provided the support and resources needed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge. (Resident B)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 10/27/25 at 10:05 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, risk for malnutrition, dementia with psychotic and mood disturbance, memory deficit, speech and language deficits, dysphagia, pain, anxiety disorder, hypertension, difficulty walking, and age-related macular degeneration.A speech therapy note, dated 9/4/25 at 9:43 a.m., indicated Resident B was severely cognitively impaired and required a mechanically ground diet.A physician's history and physical note, dated 9/4/25 at 3:22 p.m., indicated Resident B reported a 10-15-pound weight loss in one (1) month and currently weighed 78 pounds. Resident B had impaired cognition/dementia at the hospital, anxiety, constipation, insomnia, and macular…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-28 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure specific discharge instructions related to the resident's current cognitive status and memory deficit, medication administration, and food preparation needs were provided to the home health provider for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge. (Resident B)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 10/27/25 at 10:05 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, risk for malnutrition, dementia with psychotic and mood disturbance, memory deficit, speech and language deficits, dysphagia, pain, anxiety disorder, hypertension, difficulty walking, and age-related macular degeneration.A physician's order, dated 10/1/25, indicated Resident B could discharge home, on 10/3/25, with current medications and home health.A speech therapy Discharge summary, dated [DATE], indicated the recommendations were for Resident B to have supervision and assistance with medication management to ensure she was taking appropriate dosages and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was transferred with a gait belt to prevent a fall according to the policy and procedure for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident B) The deficient practice was corrected on 1/16/25, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. Findings include: A document titled Indiana State Department of Health Survey Report System, indicated CNA 2 was assisting Resident B to transfer, the resident lost her balance, and the CNA assisted the resident to the floor. The resident complained of pain to her left lower extremity and X-rays were obtained at the facility. The X-ray results indicated Resident B had a left femoral neck fracture. The party responsible for the resident decided to keep her at the facility and not to proceed with surgical intervention. She remained in hospice services. Additional education was provided to CNA 2 on the use of a gait belt and safe transfers. The record for Resident B was reviewed on 2/10/25 at 11:03 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a blood pressure medication was held according to the physician's ordered hold parameter, to give an ordered antibiotic prior to a dental visit, and to treat an elevated blood sugar with the physician's ordered sliding scale for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident 256, 4 and 52) Finding includes: 1. The clinical record for Resident 256 was reviewed on 1/2/25 at 10:29 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anemia, essential primary hypertension, and memory deficit following other cerebrovascular disease. A physician's order, dated 12/27/24, indicated to give lisinopril (a medication to lower blood pressure) 10 milligrams (mg) tablet once a day, with special instructions to hold the medication for a systolic blood pressure less than 140. A Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 12/27/24 through 1/7/25, indicated lisinopril 10 mg was not held according to the physician's order on the following dates: a. On 12/28/24, with a systolic blood pressure of 132. b. On 12/31/24, with a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure catheter urine output was accurately recorded and to document the removal of a urinary catheter with post-removal bladder scan measurements for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary catheters. (Resident 258 and 259) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 258 was reviewed on 1/3/25 at 11:36 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, aphasia following cerebral infarction, memory deficit, stage 3 chronic kidney disease, depression, hypotension, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, chronic myeloid leukemia, type 1 diabetes mellitus, and Alzheimer's disease. A physician's order, with a start date of 12/23/24, indicated to empty the Foley catheter every shift and to document the output. A current care plan, with a start date of 12/23/24, indicated to accurately document outputs on the flowsheet every shift. A Treatment Administration Record (TAR), dated 12/23/24 through 1/3/24, indicated to empty the Foley catheter every shift and document the output. On 12/23/24, the night shift had no output…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen equipment was turned on and the physician's orders were followed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 66) Finding includes: During an observation, on 1/2/25 at 11:21 a.m., Resident 66 was sitting in her recliner wearing oxygen tubing. The resident was having a hard time breathing and was not getting supplemental oxygen. The oxygen concentrator (a device used to provide supplemental oxygen therapy) was not turned on. During an observation, on 1/2/25 at 11:23 a.m., LPN 3 entered the room and checked the oxygen concentrator. The nurse turned on the concentrator and left the room to get the vitals machine to check the resident oxygen saturation. The nurse attached the pulse oximeter to the resident's finger and the resident's saturation was 82%. During an observation, on 1/2/25 at 12:51 p.m., Resident 66's door was closed, and a high-pitched whistling noise was heard coming from the resident's room. The oxygen concentrator had a red light on the top of the machine, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARDON & ASSOCIATES — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 73 rows in the source record cover these 43 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

23 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $5.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 33% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN