The Care Center Of Dequincy

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 59.1 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.14 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.39 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.78 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.14 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-01-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical abuse for 2 (#3 and #8) of 2 (#3 and #8) sampled residents investigated for abuse. The facility failed to protect: 1. Resident #8 from physical abuse by Resident #3 2. Resident #3 from physical abuse by Resident #63 This deficient practice resulted in physical harm for Resident #8 on 11/17/2024 at 4:22 p.m. when Resident #3 hit him multiple times. On 11/17/2024 at 4:22 p.m. when Resident #3 hit him multiple times, Resident #8 sustained skin tears to his left forearm and left lower leg. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Abuse Prevention and Investigation revealed, in part, the following: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections .that prohibit and prevent abuse. Abuse is the willful infliction of injury .with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 (#41) out 1 resident investigated for ADLs. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Bathing a Resident, with a reported annual review date of November 2025 read in part: policy: residents will be assisted with bathing as needed. Resident baths will be scheduled per resident preference as possible or at least 3 times weekly. Review of Resident #41's clinical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but not limited to, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, anxiety disorder, unspecified, morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, bipolar disorder, unspecified and muscle weakness (generalized). Review of Resident #41's Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 12/18/2025 revealed a BIMS (Brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the provider failed to administer medications as ordered by the physician for 1 (#42) out of 5 residents investigated for medication regimen review.Findings: On 02/10/2026, a review of Resident #42's electronic medical record revealed he admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertensive heart disease. Review of Resident #42's medications orders revealed the following: Norvasc oral tabs (Tablet) 5 mg (milligram). Give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime related to hypertensive heart disease. Hold for B/P (Blood pressure) < (less than) 100/60. Metoprolol Tartrate 25 mg. Give 1 tab by mouth two times a day. Hold for B/P <100/60 or pulse <60. Review of Resident #42's electronic Medication Administration Record (EMAR) for January 2026 and February 2026 revealed his Norvasc 5 mg tablet scheduled for 2100 (9:00 p.m.) was not given and documented by S5LPN as a 4 which indicated vitals outside of parameters for administration on the following dates, with his blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to electronically transmit a completed Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quarterly Assessment to the CMS (Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services) system within 14 days after completion for 1 ( #56) out of 1 resident investigated for resident assessment submission activities. Findings:On 02/10/2026 a review of Resident #56's electronic Quarterly MDS assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/02/2026, revealed Section Z0500B - date assessment complete was 01/16/2026. On 02/10/2026 a review of the facility's CMS Submission Report from 02/05/2026 revealed in part: Resident #56.Assessment Date 01/02/2026. Record submitted late: the submission date is more than 14 days after Z0500B on this assessment.On 02/10/2026 at 4:15 p.m., an interview and record review was conducted with S1DON (Director of Nursing). She confirmed Resident #56's Quarterly MDS with ARD of 01/02/2026, was completed on 01/16/2026 and was not transmitted within the required timeframe of 14 days after completion.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-29 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program and interview, the facility failed to take actions aimed at performance improvement and after implementing those actions, measure its success and track performance. This was evidenced by lack of evidence of: 1. Measuring or tracking success of actions implemented; and 2. collection and analysis of data; This deficient practice had the potential to affect a census of 61 residents. Findings: On 01/29/2025, a review of the facility's undated policy titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program, with a review date of 01/2025, revealed the following in part: Each facility must develop, implement, and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data driven QAPI program that focuses on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life. 2. c. Develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies. On 01/29/2025 at 2:30 p.m., a review of the QAPI program and an interview was conducted with S2DON (Director of Nursing). There was no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure alleged violations of abuse were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made to the State Survey Agency for 2 (Resident #3, Resident #8 ) of 2 (Resident #3, Resident #8) residents reviewed for Abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention and Investigation revealed, in part, the following: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections .that prohibit and prevent abuse. Abuse is the willful infliction of injury .with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Physical abuse includes hitting, slapping, punching . The facility will report all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency .immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse. The Administrator…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to initiate an investigation of an alleged violation of abuse for 1 (Resident #8) of 2 (Resident #3, Resident #8) sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Abuse Prevention and Investigation revealed, in part, the following: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections .that prohibit and prevent abuse. Abuse is the willful infliction of injury .with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Physical abuse includes hitting, slapping, punching . An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse or reports of abuse occur. Investigations include identifying and interviewing all involved persons, determining if abuse occurred, determining the extent and cause of the abuse, and providing complete and thorough documentation of the investigation. Review of the facility's Incidents by Incident Type record for the last 120 days revealed,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. The facility failed to ensure schedule IV controlled medications were stored in a locked, permanently affixed compartment and/or a single unit package drug distribution system for 1 (Room A) of 1 medication storage room reviewed. Findings: On 01/27/2025, a review of the facility's policy titled, Medications - Controlled Substances with a last review date of 01/2025, read in part, It is the policy of this facility to promote safe, high quality patient care, compliant with state and federal regulations regarding monitoring the use or controlled substances. The facility will have safeguards in place in order to prevent loss, diversion or accidental exposer. The policy also indicated how controlled medications are to be stored: Patient-specific controlled substances (e.g. narcotic/epidural infusions, tablets, etc.) are stored under double lock until administered to the patient. On 01/27/2025 at 12:54 p.m., an observation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-29 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the recipes for pureed foods were followed by the S6DC (Dietary Cook) failing to follow the recipes when preparing pureed foods. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the six residents in the facility who received a pureed diet. Findings: On 01/28/2025, a review of the facility's policy titled, Use of Recipes with no revision date, read in part, .Policy: Recipes are to be used when preparing menu items. Procedure: #3) Cooks are expected to use and follow the recipes provided. On 01/27/2025 at 10:20 a.m., an observation was conducted of S6DC as she prepared pureed white beans with ham. S6DC placed an undetermined amount of white beans with ham using a large scoop with no marked measurements. S3DM (Dietary Manager) stopped S6DC from beginning the puree process and poured the white beans with ham back in the original large pot. S3DM then measured out 7 servings of white beans with ham using a 6oz (ounce) spoodle into the blender. S6DC then began the puree process adding 4 scoops of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident was treated with respect and dignity as evidenced by the facility failing to keep a resident's urine collection bag covered and private for 1 (Resident #113) out of 1 resident (#113) investigated for dignity. Findings: Review of Resident #113's electronic medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part, acute kidney failure and retention of urine. Review of Resident #113's most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed in part, Section H: Bladder and Bowel checked for indwelling catheter. Review of Resident #113's comprehensive care plan revealed in part, the resident has (foley) catheter with an intervention that read in part, catheter: the resident has 16 FR (French), 10 CC (cubic centimeter) foley. Position catheter bag and tubing below the level of the bladder and away from entrance room door. On 01/27/2025 at 9:30 a.m., an observation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the discharge status for 1 (Resident # 60) out of 31 sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #60's discharge transfer summary on 11/29/2024 revealed he was transferred to another nursing home. Review of Resident #60's Discharge MDS assessment, with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 11/29/2024 revealed: Section A .Discharge assessment, return not anticipated, planned A2105. Discharge Status. Code 04. Short-Term General Hospital. On 01/29/2025 at 12:21 p.m., an interview and record review was conducted with S4MDS. She confirmed Resident #60 was discharged from the facility on 11/29/2024 to another nursing home. She reviewed the Discharge MDS, and confirmed the discharge status indicated he was discharged to a short term general hospital, which was coded inaccurately.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$110,240 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $110,240 — penalty dated 2025-01-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RIGHTCARE HEALTH SERVICES — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $384K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA