Our Lady Of Prompt Succor Nursing Facility

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 122 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 73.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 67 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 35% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 110.4 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.24 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.450 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.37 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.86 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.30 to 0.09 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-02-25 · tag F0732 — pattern
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure staffing information that was posted daily was accurate and current. The facility's census was 112.Findings:On 02/23/2026 at 8:20 a.m., an observation of the daily posted staffing information revealed a date of 02/20/2026. On 02/23/2026 at 1:39 p.m., a second observation of the daily posted staffing information remained unchanged with a date of 02/20/2026.On 02/23/2026 at 4:15 p.m., a third observation of the daily posted staffing information remained unchanged with a date of 02/20/2026. An interview was conducted at this time with S2HR. S2HR stated she posts the staffing information from the day prior and not the current date. S2HR also affirmed that no staffing information was posted for the weekend dates.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, policy review, personnel file review, and interviews, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance of his or her quality of life for 1 (#44) out of a finalized sample of 38 residents. Findings: A review of the facility's policy, Resident Rights, with a last review date of 08/20/2025, revealed in part: 5. Respect and dignity. The resident has a right to be treated with respect and dignity. A review of the facility's policy, Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity, with a last review date of 08/20/2025, revealed in part: Compliance Guidelines: 10. Speak respectfully to residents; avoid discussions about residents that may be overheard. A review of Resident's [NAME] of Rights Acknowledgment signed by Resident #44's representative on 02/12/2026, revealed in part: 9.The right to be treated courteously, fairly, and with the fullest measure of dignity. A review of Residents Rights In-Service on 07/23/2025,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that an injury of unknown origin was reported immediately, but not later than two (2) hours to State Survey Agency after discovering or learning of the injury for 1 (#10) of 5 residents (#5, #8 #10, #74, #98) investigated for accidents. Findings:Review of the facility's policy with a review date of 08/20/25 titled Abuse Prevention and Investigation, read in part; IV. Identification of Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation. B. Possible indicators of abuse include, but are not limited to. 3. Physical injury of a resident, of unknown source.; VII. Reporting/ Response. 1. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency. within specified timeframes: a. Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or results in serious bodily injury. Serious Bodily Injury means an injury. requiring medical intervention. Review of Resident #10's electronic medical records…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that an injury of unknown origin was reported immediately, but not later than two (2) hours to State Survey Agency after discovering or learning of the injury for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Residents #1, #2, #3) sampled residents. The deficient practice had the potential to affect a total census of 126 residents. Findings:Resident #6Review of Resident #6's completed Level I PASARR form, dated 11/16/2024, revealed it was completed prior to the resident's admission to the nursing home. Section III Mental Illness section revealed a question that read, Do you suspect the applicant has, or has the applicant ever been diagnosed as having a mental illness? The response checked was no, indicating the resident did not have a mental illness.Review of Resident #6's nursing home admission record revealed she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered plan of care and follow physician's orders for 2 (Resident #3 and Resident #74) out of 38 sampled residents as evidenced by failing to: 1. implement the comprehensive plan of care for keeping the resident's call light in reach and bed in the lowest position for Resident #3, and2. implement the comprehensive plan and physician's order for two person assistance when transferring Resident #74. Findings:Resident #3 Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses including, but not limited to: dementia with psychotic disturbance, atrial fibrillation, long term (current) use of anticoagulants and repeated falls. Review of Resident #3's February 2026 physician's orders revealed an order dated 10/24/2025, ensure bed is in lowest position. Review of Resident #3's care plan revealed the resident was at risk for falls r/t (related to) decreased mobility, poor safety…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an accurately documented medical record in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices as evidenced by failing to accurately document the use of a CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) machine in the resident's EHR (Electronic Health Record) for 1 (#16) out of a census of 112 residents.Findings:Record review revealed Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, and not limited to: sleep apnea, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and stage 3 chronic kidney disease.Record review of Resident #16's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed her BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score was 11, meaning the resident had moderate problems with thinking and memory.On 02/23/2026 at 9:30 a.m., an observation and interview with Resident #16 revealed she had a CPAP machine on her night stand. Resident #16 stated she had been refusing to use it…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, by failing to ensure:1. Staff wore appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing incontinence care to a resident on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for Resident #39; and 2. Resident #63's urinary catheter drainage bag avoided contact with the floor.Findings:Resident #39 Record review of the facility's policy last reviewed 08/20/2025, titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions read in part, It is the policy of the facility to implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO). EBP refers to the use of gown and gloves for use during high-contact resident activities for residents known to be colonized or infected with a MDRO. Implementing of EBP-a. Gowns and gloves will be available immediately near the residents room.High Contact residents care activities: d. providing hygiene, f.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that medications were stored and labeled properly in accordance with current accepted professional principles by: 1. having loose medications at the bottom of a drawer in the medication cart; and 2. staff failing to conduct and record daily temperature on the medication refrigerator in the medication storage room. Findings: Review of the facility's policy, with no revision date, titled Medications-Storage read, The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in safe, secure, and orderly manner .Policy Interpretation and Implementation .2. The nursing staff shall be responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. 1. On 01/07/2025 at 01:40 p.m., an observation was conducted of the medication cart on Hall A nurse's station with S2LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse). One peach and one white colored pill was observed on the bottom of the first large drawer in the medicine cart. During the observation, S2LPN confirmed that loose pills should not be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safely as evidenced by the nursing staff failing to conduct and record daily temperatures for the resident snack/supplement refrigerator in the medication storage room. Findings: Review of the facility's policy with no revision date titled Refrigerators & Snack/Supplements Handling read in part, .Food kept on the nursing units must be maintained as indicated below: a. Refrigerator temperatures must be checked and recorded daily, maintaining temperature between 32-40 degrees Fahrenheit . On 01/08/2025 at 11:15 a.m., an observation was conducted with S3LPN of the medication room on the Hall B nurse's station. Review of the resident's snack/supplement refrigerator temperature logs for November 2024 through December 2024 revealed missing temperatures on the following dates: 11/01/2024, 11/02/2024, 11/03/2024, 11/12/2024, 11/13/2024, 11/14/2024, 11/16/2024,11/17/2024, 11/18/2024, 11/20/2024, 11/21/2024, 11/22/2024, 11/23/2024, 11/25/2024,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observations, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with respect and dignity and cared for in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her own quality of life by failing to apply a privacy cover to an indwelling catheter urinary drainage bag for 1 (#37) of 32 sampled residents. Findings: Review of Resident #37's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/25/2019, with diagnoses that included in part .Dementia with Agitation, Alzheimer's Disease, Disorder of Kidney and Ureter, Acute Kidney Failure, and Encounter for Fitting and Adjustment of Urinary Device . Review of Resident #37's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 11/23/2024 revealed a BIMS score of 99, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Resident #37 required extensive assistance with two person physical assistance for bed mobility and toilet use. Resident #37 used an indwelling urinary catheter for urine elimination. Review of Resident #37's current clinical physician's orders revealed an order date…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RIGHTCARE HEALTH SERVICES — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA