St Frances Nsg & Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 53.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 75.1 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.02 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.20 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.78 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.55 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.21 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.23 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #2, who had been assessed to be at high risk for elopement, received adequate supervision to prevent the resident from eloping from the facility, for 1 (#2) of 4 (#1, #2, #3, and #4) residents reviewed for elopement. Findings: This deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy situation on 10/26/2024 at 1:55 a.m., when Resident #2, who was moderately impaired cognitively, had a history of exit seeking behaviors, had been identified as a high elopement risk, and wore a wanderguard bracelet, exited the facility through the front door without staff knowledge. The alarm sounded and S6 LPN walked outside to investigate why the alarm had sounded; however, S6 LPN did not alert facility staff to immediately perform a census check on all residents in the facility when no resident was observed outside the building. Facility staff became knowledgeable of Resident #2's elopement when a family member notified the facility at 2:13…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-11-06 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview on record review, the facility failed to administer its resources effectively to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, for 1 (#2) of 4 (#1, #2, #3, and #4) residents reviewed for elopement. The Administration failed to have an effective system in place to respond when Resident #2, who was assessed to be at risk for elopement, eloped from the facility on 10/26/2024 at 1:55 a.m. The likelihood continued for the remaining 3 residents (#1, #3 and #4), who were assessed as being at risk for elopement. This deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy situation on 10/26/2024 at 1:55 a.m., when Resident #2, who was moderately impaired cognitively, had a history of exit seeking behaviors, had been identified as a high elopement risk, and wore a wanderguard bracelet, exited the facility through the front door without staff knowledge. The alarm sounded and S6 LPN walked outside to investigate why the alarm had sounded; however,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure their grievance policy and procedure was followed for 1 (Resident #20) of 1 resident reviewed for missing personal property. The facility failed to initiate a grievance for Resident #20 regarding the reported missing money. Total sample size was 47. Findings:Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Grievances/Complaints read in part.1. Any resident, his or her representative (sponsor), family member, or appointed advocate may file a grievance or complaint to the facility other entity that hears grievances concerning treatment, medical care, behavior of other residents, staff members, theft of property, and other concerns regarding their LTC facility stay without fear of threat or reprisal in any form.4. Upon receipt of a grievance and/or complaint, the grievance official will ensure prompt investigation and resolution of the allegations. Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/10/2025, with diagnoses that included, in part.Type 2 Diabetes with Hyperglycemia, Hypertensive Heart…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who are unable to carry out ADLS (Activities of Daily Living) received the necessary services to maintain grooming for 1 (Resident #64) of 3 residents reviewed for ADL care. The total sample size was 47.Review of facility undated policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) revealed in part. A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene.Review of Resident #64's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/26/1986, with diagnoses that included, in part. Unspecified Vision Loss, Unspecified Intellectual Disabilities, and Communication Deficit.Review of Resident #64's Significant Change MDS with ARD 04/10/2026 revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 4, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Resident #64 required substantial/maximal assistance with showering/bathing and all personal hygiene/grooming.On 05/04/2026 at 10:18 a.m., observation revealed Resident #64…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the planned menus were followed to meet the nutritional needs of the residents that required mechanically altered diets. The facility failed to provide bread or bread substitute for 2 (#68 and #69) of 2 residents who received mechanically altered diets. Findings:Resident #68Review of Resident #68's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 03/25/2026 revealed Resident #68 had a BIMS score of 99, indicating an assessment could not be completed. Resident #68 required a mechanically altered diet. Resident #69Review of Resident #69's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 03/19/2026 revealed Resident had a BIMS score of 9, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #69 required a mechanically altered diet. On 05/04/2026 at 11:10 a.m., observation of two lunch trays for Resident #68 and #69, who were prescribed mechanical soft diets revealed the following:1. Resident #68, who was prescribed a mechanical soft diet, did not receive cornbread or a substitute for bread with her lunch meal. 2. Resident #69, who was prescribed a mechanical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to ensure open food items stored in the pantry and refrigerator were properly sealed and labeled with an open date. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 44 residents who received meals served from the kitchen. Findings:Review of an undated policy titled Storage: Dry Food read in part.Dry food storage pertains to those foods not likely to support bacterial growth in their normal state.Procedure:2. Keep all containers tightly closed from insects, rodents, and dust. Dry foods can become contaminated, even if they don't need refrigeration. An observation on 05/04/2026 at 9:18 a.m. of the facility pantry and refrigerator revealed the following:1. One package of vanilla wafers was observed open to air.2. One gallon of mayonnaise was observed opened without a date indicating when the item was opened.3. Two plastic cereal containers were labeled with an open date of 04/14/2025.4. One plastic cereal container was labeled with an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and an interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medical record was accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices. The facility failed to ensure activities of daily living tasks performed for Resident #2 were accurately documented in the resident's medical record. Findings:Review of an undated policy titled Documentation read in part.The purpose of charting and documentation is to provide:1. A complete account of the resident's care, treatment, response to the care, signs, symptoms, etc. for the continuity of care, treatment decisions, and to support services provided for payment. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an initial admit date of 05/06/2024 and a re-entry date of 03/27/2025, with diagnoses that included in part:., Displaced Intertrochanteric Fracture of the Right Femur, Type 2 Diabetes, Severe Protein Calorie Malnutrition, Dementia, Viral Hepatitis C, and Cirrhosis of the Liver. Review of Resident #2's MDS with an ARD of 02/02/2026 revealed Resident #2 had a BIMS score of 6, indicating…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-30 · tag F0576 — widespread
  Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received mail on Saturdays. This has the potential to affect all 73 residents residing in the facility. Findings: Review of an undated facility policy on 04/29/2025 at 11:45 a.m. titled, Resident Right to Privacy in Communication revealed the following in part .The facility will honor the resident's right to privacy in written communication including the right to: 1.Send and promptly receive mail that is unopened. 1. The social service designee, or another designated staff member, will ensure each resident receives any mail addressed to that particular resident promptly. On 04/28/2025 at 1:30 p.m., the Resident Council Meeting was conducted and revealed the residents did not receive mail on Saturdays. In an interview on 04/29/2025 at 10:09 a.m., S11 [NAME] Clerk stated her duty as [NAME] Clerk on Saturdays included gathering the facility mail from the mail box located outside the facility. S11 [NAME] Clerk stated she would then lock the facility mail in the medication room companied by the nurse on duty.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for 1 (#29) of 3 (#1, #23, and #29) Residents observed during medication administration, by failing to administer Spironolactone (antihypertensive) medication as ordered. Review of the facility's undated policy titled Medications- Administering on 04/30/2025 at 11:31 a.m. read in part . Medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. The individual administering the medication must check the label 3 times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication. Observation on 04/29/2025 at 7:54 a.m. revealed S12 LPN performed medication administration for Resident #29. Observation revealed S12 LPN placed 9.5 tablets into medication cup for administration. S12 LPN confirmed count of 9.5 tablets, and then administered the medications to Resident #29.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure that each resident was treated with respect and dignity in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 (Resident # 22) of 4 (Resident #9, Resident #22, Resident #43, and Resident #225) sampled Residents reviewed for dignity in a total sample size of 25. The facility failed to ensure S7 CNA did not stand while feeding Resident #22 during meal service. Findings: Review of Resident # 22's Clinical Record revealed an admit date of 10/19/2023 with diagnoses that included: Fracture of Unspecified part of the Neck of Left Femur, Subsequent Encounter for Closed Fracture with Routine Healing; Dementia; Anxiety; Protein Calorie Malnutrition; Vitamin deficiency; Hyperlipidemia; Depression; Psychotic Disorder with Delusions d/t know Psychological Condition; Delusions; Alzheimer's disease. Review of Resident # 22's Care Plan with a revision date of 04/17/2025 revealed a potential for Malnutrition with interventions that included in part . Resident to be fed meals per…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an allegation of physical abuse was reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made to the State Survey Agency for 1 (#74) of 25 Sampled Residents. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy on 04/30/2025 at 11:31 a.m. titled Abuse Prevention and Investigation read in part . Abuse means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish, which can include staff to resident abuse and certain resident to resident altercations. Abuse also includes the deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish. It includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and mental abuse including…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan consistent with the resident rights that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 (Resident #9) resident of 25 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #9's care plan for Psychotropic drugs: Risperdal, Buspirone, and Trazodone was developed and/or initiated. Findings: Review of a facility's undated policy on 04/30/2025 at 1:18 p.m. titled, Care Plan-Comprehensive revealed the following in part . 11. The comprehensive care plan will include measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's needs as identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. The objectives will be utilized to monitor the resident's progress. Alternative interventions will be documented, as needed. Review of a facility's undated policy on 04/30/2025 at 1:18 p.m. titled, Care Plans-Preliminary revealed the following in part .A preliminary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$30,702 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $15,351 — penalty dated 2024-11-06
• $15,351 — penalty dated 2024-11-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RIGHTCARE HEALTH SERVICES — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $510K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA