Deridder Retirement & Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 60.2 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.45 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.17 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.17 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from sexual abuse by another resident for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to protect Resident #1 from being sexually abused by Resident #2. This deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy situation on 11/22/2024 at 7:50 a.m., when Resident #2, who was cognitively intact, and had a history of inappropriate sexual behaviors entered the room of a cognitively impaired resident (Resident #1), and was found with his mouth on her mouth and his hand in her brief. The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed prior to the State Agency's Investigation, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy on 12/04/2024 titled Abuse Prevention and Investigation revealed in part .Residents have the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2024-08-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate assistance to prevent accidents for 1 Resident (Resident #43) of 2 (Resident #12 and Resident #43) sampled residents, a total sample of 21. This deficient practice resulted in an actual harm for Resident #43 on 04/28/2024 at 9:15 p.m., when S5 CNA failed to use 2 person assistance, when she transferred Resident #43 from the wheelchair to the bed. S5 CNA dropped Resident #43 onto the floor during transfer. On 04/29/2024 at 8:00 a.m., Resident #43 complained of pain to the left elbow. On 04/29/2024, X-rays were obtained, and Resident #43 was diagnosed with an Impacted Humeral Head Fracture, Acute with Osteopenia. Findings: Review of the facility's policy and procedure dated, and titled Safe Resident Handling/Transfers read in part . Policy: It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents are handled and transferred safely to prevent or minimize risks for injury, and provide and promote a safe, secure and comfortable experience for the resident, while keeping…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen to prevent the likelihood of foodborne illnesses and failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice had the potential to effect all 58 residents who consumed food from the kitchen. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Expired food items were discarded and not available for usage:2. Food items were properly stored, labeled, and dated;3. Dishware were properly clean and sanitized in accordance with food safety;4. Dietary staff worn hair/facial hair restraints while in the kitchen; and 5. Food temperatures were checked before meal services.Findings:Review of an undated facility policy on 12/15/2025 at 12:39 p.m. titled, References revealed the following in part .Sink: Solution 200PPM.Review of an undated facility policy on 12/16/2025 at 8:48 a.m. titled, Storage: Dry Food revealed the following in part .3. Discard any expired foods. Review of an undated facility policy on 12/16/2025 at 8:48 a.m. titled, Sanitation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an infection prevention and control program was maintained to provide a safe and sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Enhanced Barrier Precaution procedures were followed for Resident #54 and Resident #44. 2. Staff decontaminated reusable medical equipment between uses on different residents. Review of an undated facility policy on 12/16/2025 at 8:48 a.m. titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions revealed the following in part .It is the policy of this facility to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO). 2. Enhanced Barrier Precautions- Nursing staff will place residents with any applicable conditions or devices on EBP. An order may be obtained. Applicable conditions and devices: i. Wounds and/or indwelling medical devices (central lines, hemodialysis, catheters, urinary catheter etc.) even if the resident is not known…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a Quarterly MDS assessment as required for 1 (Resident #4) of 28 sampled residents.Findings: Review of Resident #4's EMR revealed an admission date of 08/19/2019 with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Major Depressive Disorder, and Diabetes Mellitus, Type II. Review of Resident #28's MDS record revealed a Quarterly MDS with ARD of 11/01/2025 was exported on 12/15/2025. An interview on 12/17/2025 at 12:20 p.m. with S12 LPN confirmed Resident #4's Quarterly MDS with ARD of 11/01/2025 should have been submitted by 11/15/2025, but was not.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards for 1 (Resident #53) of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered at the prescribed flow rate.Findings: Review of Resident #53's EMR revealed an admission date of 11/17/2022 with diagnoses including Asthma and COPD.Review of Resident #53's physician's orders revealed the following, in part.O2 (Oxygen) at 2 LPM via NC PRN O2 sat <92% dated 02/15/2023.Observation of Resident #53 on 12/15/2025 at 10:30 a.m. revealed O2 at 4 LPM via NC.Observation of Resident #53 on 12/16/2025 at 9:54 a.m. revealed O2 at 4 LPM via NC.Observation of Resident #53 on 12/16/2025 at 11:38 a.m. accompanied by S5 LPN revealed O2 at 4 LPM via NC. Interview with S5 LPN during the observation confirmed Resident #53's O2 should have been administered at 2 LPM, but was not.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate below 5%. The facility had a 7.41% medication error rate with 2 medication errors out of 27 opportunities. The facility failed to ensure:1. The correct topical medication was applied, in the correct site, and at the correct time for Resident #67; and2. Failure to ensure IV Vancomycin was infused at the correct infusion rate for Resident #44. Findings Observation of medication administration with S5LPN on 12/16/2025 at 9:16 a.m. revealed Desonide 0.05% Cream was applied to Resident #67's Right AKA stump. Review of Resident #67's physician's orders revealed the following, in part. Desonide 0.05% Cream - apply to face topically at bedtime, dated 12/04/2025; and Lidocaine External Cream 5% - apply to right stump area topically one time a day, dated 12/04/2025. Interview with S5LPN on 12/16/2025 at 11:17 a.m. confirmed she applied the wrong medication (Desonide Cream), to the wrong body site (Right stump), at the wrong time (AM), but should not have. Resident #44Review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with current accepted professional principles by failing to ensure:1. Unattended treatment cart (Cart C) was locked appropriately;2. Expired medications were not available for use; and3. Drawers containing emergency medications were locked when not in use. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 63 residents who currently resided in the facility. Findings: Review of an undated facility policy on 12/16/2025 at 8:48 a.m. titled, Medications-Storage revealed the following in part .The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. 7. Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes) containing drugs and biologicals shall be locked when not in use, and trays or carts used to transport such items shall not be left unattended if open or otherwise potentially…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0801 — isolated
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to employ staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services by failing to ensure the dietary manager met the minimum qualifications of a certified dietary manager. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 58 residents who consumed food from the kitchen. Findings:Review of an undated facility policy on 12/16/2025 at 3:36 p.m. titled, Food Service Manager revealed the following in part .Education: Dietary Manager certification is required. Qualifications: 1. Must be either a Dietary Assistant, Certified Dietary Manager, or Registered Dietitian. In an interview on 12/16/2025 at 2:19 p.m., S4 DM revealed she was hired in 08/2025 and has not worked in a nursing home setting before. S4 DM stated she has not obtained any certifications since she has been hired as the Dietary Manager, including the Serve Safe Certification. S4 DM revealed she has received guidance from the Registered Dietician and a Chef, who were both facility contracted individuals and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse were disposed of properly. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 63 residents who resided in the facility. Findings:Review of an undated facility policy on 12/16/2025 at 8:48 a.m. titled, Trash revealed the following in part .1. All waste must be place in sealed containers. All garbage and trash will be place in a dumpster in a convenient area near the facility. The lid to the dumpster is to be kept closed at all times. Observation on 12/15/2025 at 9:38 a.m. of the facility dumpsters accompanied by S1 Administrator revealed two facility dumpsters (Dumpster A and Dumpster B). Observation of Dumpster A revealed an opened side lid to the dumpster. S1 Administrator stated he expects all staff to close the dumpster doors/lids when they were finished taking the trash out. S1 Administrator confirmed Dumpster A had an opened side lid and it should have been closed at all times when not in use, but was not.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status by failing to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Behaviors for 1 (#2) of 3 (#1, #2 and #3) sampled residents. The facility failed to accurately capture Resident #2's inappropriate behavior against Resident #3 during the lookback period. Findings: Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admit date of 09/02/2020, with diagnoses that included: Malignant Neoplasm of upper left lung, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Paranoid Schizophrenia, Major Depressive Disorder, Hypertensive Heart Disease, Other Anxiety Disorders, and Other Sexual Disorders. Review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 08/26/2024 revealed a BIMS score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Resident #2 required staff physical assistance with transfers, locomotion on/off unit, toileting, dressing, and personal hygiene. Review of Resident #2's Discharge MDS with an ARD of 09/09/2024 revealed there were no physical behaviors exhibited that were directed towards others…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Residents who are unable to carry out ADLS (Activities of Daily Living) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 3 (#17, #32 and #52) of 3 (#17, #32 and #52) Residents reviewed for ADL's. The facility failed to ensure a Resident's (#17, #32 and #52) received nail care. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Nail Care revealed the following: The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for provision of care to a resident's nails for good grooming and health . 1. Routine cleaning and inspection of nails will be provided during ADL care on an ongoing basis . Resident #32 Record review revealed Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnosis that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Hypertensive Heart Disease with Heart Failure, Chronic Pain due to Trauma and Muscle Weakness. Review of the admission MDS with ARD of 07/31/2024…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$24,119 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $14,641 — penalty dated 2024-12-06
• $9,478 — penalty dated 2024-08-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RIGHTCARE HEALTH SERVICES — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $785K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA