Colonial Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 57.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 64 beds and averages 61.0 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.71 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-05-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was in place for a cognitively impaired resident who was identified as being at high risk for elopement, exhibited exit seeking behaviors, and voiced a desire to leave the facility did not exit the building for 1 (#156) of 11 (#2, #3, #23,#24, #25, #38, #44, #47, #48, #156 and #157) residents at risk for elopement. Findings: This deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy situation for Resident #156 on 05/16/2025 at 8:15 a.m., when Resident #156, who had a BIMS of 4, was cognitively impaired, and exhibited exit seeking behaviors went out of a bathroom window. Resident #156 then walked to a nearby neighborhood approximately 0.5 miles away. At approximately 10:30 a.m., the local police department notified the facility that Resident #156 was in custody after being arrested for theft of a motor vehicle. On 05/16/2025 at 1:00 p.m., Resident #156 returned to the facility. The facility implemented corrective…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2025-11-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from staff to resident physical abuse, for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents investigated for abuse. Resident #1, a cognitive resident, experienced psychosocial harm as a result of the physical abuse by staff. This deficient practice resulted in psychosocial harm to Resident #1 on 10/11/2025 at 1:15 p.m., when Resident #1 reported to S2 CNA that S3 CNA entered his room without invitation and intentionally poured water on him in an attempt to stop him from masturbating. Resident #1, who had a BIMS score of 15 (cognitively intact), was tearful and fearful following the physical abuse from S3 CNA. The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed prior to the State Agency's investigation, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance citation. Findings:Review of the undated facility policy titled Abuse Prevention and Investigation revealed in part.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident's personal funds were available during non-business hours for 1 (Resident #23) of 34 sampled residents. Total facility census was 63.Findings:Review of a facility policy titled Availability of Resident Funds-After Business Office Hours, read in part.Policy: It is the practice of this facility to provide residents reasonable access to their personal funds after business office hours. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines:2. During non-business office hours (e.g .nights, weekends, and holidays), the Business Office Manager, or designee, provides the Charge Nurse on duty at the time the business office closes a residents' fund petty cash box. 5. Staff members receive training on this policy in order to direct residents to the Charge Nurse when requests for personal funds are made during non-business office hours. Interview on 05/26/2026 at 1:20 p.m. with Resident #23 revealed when she asked for her money it usually took two days to receive it. Resident #23 revealed in the evenings and weekends, no staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman in writing of resident transfer/discharge for 1 (Resident #65) of 1 resident reviewed for transfer/discharge. The total sample size was 63.Findings:Review of Resident #65's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/16/2026 and a discharge date of 03/02/2026. Resident #65 had diagnosis of Emphysema, Heart Failure, Nutritional Anemia, Cocaine Use, Essential Hypertension, and Unspecified Viral Hepatitis CReview of the facility's March Emergency Transfer Log revealed a list of only hospitalization transfers and Resident #65's discharge was not listed.In an interview on 05/28/2026 at 3:40 p.m., S5 SSD revealed all discharges were reported to the Ombudsman monthly on the 15th for the previous month. She stated she sends the log via email to [NAME], Ombudsman. She confirmed Resident #65 was not on March Emergency Transfer Log, but should have been. In an interview on 05/28/2026 at 3:48 p.m., S1 Adm confirmed Resident #65 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected the Residents' status for 3 (#6, #17, and #57) of 34 sampled residents by failing:1. to ensure the Significant Change MDS assessments were correct for Resident #6 and Resident #17; and2. to ensure Resident #57's 03/23/2026 Quarterly MDS contained accurate diagnoses.Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, MDS – Conducting and Accurate Resident Assessment revealed the following, in part: Policy: The purpose of this policy is to assure that all residents receive an accurate assessment of relevant care areas. Resident #6 Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/24/2024 and diagnoses that included, but are not limited to, Other Psychoactive Substance Abuse With Psychoactive Substance-Induced Psychotic Disorder with Delusions; Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Hyperglycemia; Abnormal Weight Loss; Anorexia; and Personal History of Traumatic Brain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record reviews, and investigations, the facility failed to ensure the development and implementation of the residents' person-centered plan of care for 3 (#23, #51, and #52) of 34 sampled residents by failing to:1. to develop and implement a care plan for Resident #23's dialysis needs;2. to develop and implement a care plan for Resident #51's ADL needs; and3. to monitor effectiveness of diabetic medications on Resident #52.Findings: Resident #23 Review of Resident #23's medical record revealed an admit date of 07/10/2024 with diagnoses that included in part.Human Immunodeficiency Virus, End Stage Renal Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Hypertensive Heart Disease with Heart Failure, and Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Review of Resident #23's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 04/06/2026 revealed a BIMS score of 13 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS revealed Resident #23 was dependent with toileting, bathing, dressing and personal hygiene; and required substantial/maximal assistance with eating and oral hygiene. The MDS revealed Resident had End Stage Renal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen to prevent the likelihood of foodborne illnesses and failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice had the potential to effect all 63 residents who resided in the facility. The facility failed to ensure:1. Expired Food items in the pantry were not available for use;2. Staff are wearing beard restraints to prevent hair from contacting food Findings: Review of an undated facility policy titled, Date Marking for Food Safety revealed in part.Policy: The facility adheres to a date marking system to ensure the safety of ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food. 5. The discard day or date may not exceed the manufacturer's use-by date, or four days, whichever is earliest. The date of opening or preparation counts as day 1. Review of a facility policy dated January 2025 titled, Infection Control-Preventing Foodborne Illness-Employee Hygiene and Sanitary Practices revealed in part…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility staff failed to use standard precautions by performing hand hygiene during medication administration for 4(Resident #9, Resident #11, Resident #38, Resident #47) of 4 residents observed.Review of policy Hand Hygiene Table dated January 2025 revealed, hand hygiene should be used between resident contacts- either antimicrobial Soap and Water or Alcohol Based Hand Rub.Observation of medication administration on 05/27/2026 with S7 LPN revealed that she did not perform hand hygiene by not washing or sanitizing her hands between medication administrations of the 4 observed residents.Interview on 05/27/2026 at 08:20 AM with S7 LPN confirmed, Absolutely, I should have used sanitizer between administrations of medication between residents.Interview on 05/27/2026 at 08:30 AM with S2 DON confirmed, that the nurse should have sanitized hands between residents.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported immediately to the administrator of the facility for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure staff reported an allegation of staff-to-resident abuse to facility Administrator. Findings:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included in part. Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, Diabetes, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Vascular Disease affecting Left Non-Dominant Side, Vascular Dementia, Epilepsy, and Unspecified Other Behavioral Disturbance. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 08/20/2025, revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated cognition was intact. The MDS revealed Resident #1 was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of Resident #1's Care Plan, with a review date of 01/08/2025, revealed in part.On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's person centered plan of care was reviewed and revised to include approaches/ interventions to address the resident's self pleasuring behavior for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 sampled resident's care plans reviewed. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included in part. Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, Diabetes, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Vascular Disease affecting Left Non-Dominant Side, Vascular Dementia, Epilepsy, and Unspecified Other Behavioral Disturbance.An interview on 11/20/2025 at 1:35 p.m., with S2CNA revealed Resident #1 masturbates in his room frequently. S2CNA stated staff were aware of his sexual behaviors and have been instructed to close the door or pull the privacy curtain if Resident #1 engages in self-pleasure.A telephone interview on 11/20/2025 at 2:58 p.m., with S3CNA revealed on 10/11/2025 at approximately 1:00-1:15…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #25 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and monitor interventions to maintain proper hydration and nutrition for 2 (Resident #25 and Resident #8) of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility failed to: 1. Implement and monitor hydration consistent with Resident #25's assessed needs; and 2. Notify the Registered Dietician of Resident #8's change in nutritional needs. Findings: Review of an undated facility policy on 05/29/2025 at 7:12 p.m. titled, Intake and Output, Monitoring Fluids revealed the following in part .4. For residents with a physician's order for fluid encouragement, fluids will be encouraged as per the resident's care plan. 6. The following residents require measurement and documentation of intake and output. A. Residents with a physician's order for intake and output measurement. Review of an undated facility policy on 05/29/2025 at 7:12 p.m. titled, Hydration Program revealed the following in part .to provide all residents with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The deficient practice had the potential to effect all of the residents who received meals from the kitchen. There were 55 residents who resided in the facility. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Food items in pantry were stored in a sealed container; 2. Opened food items in refrigerator and freezer were labeled with an open date and stored in a sealed container; and 3. Snacks considered potentially hazardous food were stored appropriately. Findings: A review of the facility's undated policy titled, Storage: Freezer revealed in part . Keep all frozen foods tightly wrapped or packaged to prevent freezer burn . Label and date all items. A review of the facility's undated policy titled, Storage: Refrigerator revealed in part . Keep refrigerated foods wrapped or covered and in sanitary containers. A review of the facility's undated policy titled, Storage: Dry Food revealed in part .Keep all containers tightly closed from insects, rodents, and dust. Dry…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$21,752 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $9,110 — penalty dated 2025-11-24
• $12,642 — penalty dated 2025-05-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RIGHTCARE HEALTH SERVICES — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $998K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA