Mansfield Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 44 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 82.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 60.5 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 40 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.07 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.16 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.66 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.30 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.15 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to immediately notify 1 (#2) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sample resident's physician and/or the DON (Director of Nursing) of the significant change in a resident's physical condition. The facility failed to notify the physician and/or the DON when resident #2 had a change in condition including severe shortness of breath and an oxygen saturation level of 60%.Findings:Review of the facility's Physician Notification policy (undated) revealed in part:Policy Interpretation and Implementation. In general, the Charge Nurse will notify the resident's attending physician:Immediately, if the resident's condition is deemed an emergency. In addition, emergency services personnel may be contacted at the discretion of the licensed nurse on duty.If staff is unable to contact the resident's physician, the medical director will be notified. If the Medical Director is the resident's physician or if staff is unable to contact the Medical Director, the Administrator and/or the DON (Director of Nursing) will be notified.Call the doctor, immediate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to accommodate the needs of 1(#8) of 20 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure the resident was reassessed for the use assist rails.Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed Resident #8 was admitted [DATE], with a readmission date of 07/28/2025. Resident #8's diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left-non dominate side and lack of coordination. Review of Resident #8's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 06/08/2025 revealed Resident #8 had a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 13/15, indicating intact cognition. Resident #8 had limited range of motion for both upper and lower extremities on one side. An observation on 08/11/2025 at 9:47 a.m. Resident #8's resting in bed, which did not have assist rails.During an interview on 08/11/2025 at 9:47 a.m. Resident #8 reported while she was away at the hospital, the facility removed her bed rails. Resident #8 reported…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-13 · tag F0628 — pattern
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to: provide to the resident and/or the resident's responsible party (RP) written notice which specified the reason for transfer, effective date, location and statement of the resident's appeal rights, and duration of the bed hold policy for 1 (#74) of 2 (#74, #76) residents reviewed for transfer/discharge, and notify the State's Long Term Care Ombudsman of discharges in writing for 2 (#74, #76) of 2 (#74, #76) residents reviewed for discharge requirements. Findings: Review of the facility's Bed Hold Prior to Transfer undated policy revealed in part: Policy:Prior to transferring a resident to the hospital or the resident goes on therapeutic leave, the facility will provide written information to the resident and/or the resident representative regarding bed hold.Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines:Notice before Transfer1. The following information will be given to the resident and/or resident representative.a. The duration of the state bed-hold,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were practiced to provide a safe, sanitary environment and help prevent the development and transmission of infection for 3 (#10, #13, #79) of 3 (#10, #13, #79) sampled residents requiring EBP (enhanced barrier precautions). The facility failed to:1. Post clear signage outside Resident #10, #13 and #79's room indicating the type of precautions, required personal protective equipment and high contact resident care activities that require the use of gown and gloves,2. Have gowns, gloves and alcohol-based hand rub available outside the room for Resident #10, #13 and #79 and 3. Obtain an order for EBP for Resident #79. Findings:Review of Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy dated January 2025, revealed in part: Enhanced barrier precautions refer to the use of gown and gloves for use during high-contact resident care activities for residents known to be colonized or infected with a multidrug-resistant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided consistent with professional standards of practice and followed facility's policies for 2 (# 60, #77) of 2 (#60, #77) residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure: 1.) Oxygen cannula and tubing was changed per facility policy (Resident #60), 2.) Respiratory mask was stored per facility policy (Resident #77), and 3.) An oxygen in use sign was placed on the outside of the resident's room entrance door per facility policy (Resident #77). Findings:Review of the facility's Respiratory Equipment-Infection Control Guidelines policy procedures dated June 2024 revealed, in part: Oxygen Concentrators: 1. Oxygen cannula or mask and tubing should be dated when put in use and changed at least weekly or whenever contamination is suspected. Medication Nebulizers/Continuous Aerosol Machines/CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) /BIPAP (Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure): 3. Equipment,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews the facility failed to ensure the Controlled Drug Record was maintained and reconciled for 1 (Cart A) of 1 (Cart A) medication cart reviewed. Review of the facility's Medications - Controlled Substances Policy (undated) revealed in part:1. General Protocols:a. Controlled substances are stored in a separate compartment of an automated dispensing system or other locked storage unit with access limited to approved personnel. d. All controlled substances (Schedule II, III, IV, and V) are accounted for in one of the following ways:ii. All controlled substances obtained from a non-automated medication cart or cabinet are recorded on the designated usage form. Written documentation must be clearly legible with all applicable information provided.iii. All specially compounded or non-stock Schedule II controlled substances dispensed from the pharmacy for a specific patient are recorded on the Controlled Drug Record supplied with the medication or other designated form…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from abuse of misappropriation of property and exploitation by staff for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents. S2 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) transferred money from Resident #1's bank account via [NAME] (bank to bank transfer) to her personal bank account. The facility implemented corrective actions which were completed prior to the State Agency's investigation entry on 03/17/2025, thus it was determined to be a Past Noncompliance Citation. Findings: Review of Facility's Abuse Prevention and Investigation (undated) Policy and Procedures revealed: Residents have the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse, neglect, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, and misappropriation of property, exploitation, and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. Residents will not be subjected to abuse by anyone. Policy Interpretation and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-14 · tag F0577 — pattern
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interview the facility failed to ensure the most recent survey results were posted in a place readily accessible to the residents, family members or anyone to review. Findings: Observation on 08/12/2024 at 10:00 a.m. failed to reveal the most recent survey results were posted in a place that was readily accessible for review. Observation on 08/12/2024 at 10:00 a.m. with S1 Administrator revealed the most recent survey results were not posted in a place that was readily available for review. During an interview on 08/12/2024 at 11:45 a.m. S1 Administrator confirmed the most recent survey results should have been posted for residents, family and anyone to review. .

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-14 · tag F0700 — pattern
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the correct use and the maintenance of bed rails by ensuring residents were assessed for the risk of entrapment from bed rails, obtaining a written order from the physician for bed rails and an informed consent from resident or resident representative prior to installation for 4 (#8, #10, #13, #37) out of 7 (#5, #8, #10, #13, #34, #37, #39) residents reviewed for accidents. Findings: Resident #8 Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed an admit date of 09/27/2023 with the following diagnoses, including but not limited to functional quadriplegia and history of falling. Review of Resident #8's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 9 indicating moderately impaired cognition and a functional status requiring total dependence with two person for bed mobility and transfer. Review of Resident #8's medical record on 08/13/2024 at 11:00 a.m. failed to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free of unnecessary medications for 2 (#13, #39) out of 5 (#13, #14, #37, #39, #60) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to monitor Resident #13 for side effects while receiving an antidepressant and Resident #39 for side effects while receiving antidepressant and antianxiety medications. Findings: Resident #13 Review of Resident #13's medical records revealed an admit date of 06/29/2023 with the following diagnoses, including but not limited to unspecified lack of coordination, abnormalities of gait and mobility, cognitive communication deficit, other specified depressive episodes and muscle weakness (generalized). Review of Resident #13's comprehensive care plan revealed at risk for adverse reactions and or side effects related to daily use of antidepressant medication - assess for adverse side effects/document and report, and monitor for extrapyramidal symptoms and document. Review of Resident #13's physician's orders revealed an order dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RIGHTCARE HEALTH SERVICES — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $755K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA