Lakeview Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 85.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 122 beds and averages 95.4 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.62 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.18 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.51 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.88 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.20 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-04-15 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — pattern
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to have a system in place to provide individualized behavioral health services, which met the individualized needs of a resident by preventing and treating their mental health disorder(s) for 1 (#17) of 7 residents reviewed for behavioral health in the sample Findings: Review of the facility's undated Provision of Quality Care Policy, as of 04/15/2026 at 3:45 p.m., revealed, in part, the following: Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. Each resident will be provided care and services to attain or maintain his/her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. 3. Qualified persons will provide the care and treatment in accordance with the resident's choices. 6. The facility will employ on a full-time, part-time, or consultant basis those professionals necessary to carry out the provisions of the residents' care plans. Review of the facility's undated Behavioral Health Services Policy, as of 04/15/2026 at 3:45…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to ensure: 1. Food was labeled and / or dated with a preparation date; and 2. Left over food was discarded in a timely manner.This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 91 residents who received nourishment from the facility's kitchen.Findings: Review of the undated facility policy titled Storage: Freezer revealed the following, in part:3. Label and date all items Review of the undated facility policy titled Storage: Refrigerator revealed the following, in part:6. If raw foods must be kept in the same refrigerator keep cooked foods above raw foods. If cooked foods are kept below raw foods, they can become contaminated by drips and spills. Then, if they are not to be cooked again before serving, they may be hazardous.7. Keep refrigerated foods wrapped or covered in sanitary containers. On 04/14/2026 at 2:24 p.m., an interview was conducted with S4DM. S4DM confirmed 91 residents…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff notified the provider when staff heard Resident #89 state she did not want to live anymore for 1 (#89) of 3 residents reviewed for Dementia Care.Findings:Review of Resident #89's Clinical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Unspecified Dementia, Mood Disturbance, Anxiety, and Schizoaffective Disorder.Review of Resident #89's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 03/03/2026 revealed the resident had a BIMS of 12, indicating the resident was moderate cognitively impaired.Review of Resident #89's Nursing Notes, dated 02/23/2026 at 5:53 a.m., revealed the following: Resident #89 was heard in her room stating I just want to die already. S16LPN asked Resident #89 why she felt that way and Resident #89 stated because people are talking about her. S16LPN asked what people and Resident #89 pointed to the empty bed in her room. S16LPN assured her no one was in the room with her. Resident #89…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to respect the resident's right to personal privacy for 2 (#8 and #63) of the 25 residents reviewed for privacy in the initial pool. The facility failed to ensure Residents #8 and #63 had privacy curtains around their beds.Findings: Resident #8Review of Resident #8's Clinical Record revealed an admission date of 07/03/2025. Review of Resident #8's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 03/26/2026 revealed that the resident had a BIMS of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #63Review of Resident # 63's Clinical Record revealed an admission date of 04/28/2025. Review of Resident #63's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 02/02/2026 revealed that the resident had a BIMS of 14, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Review of facility Census revealed Resident #8 and Resident #63 were roommates. On 04/13/2026 at 9:01 a.m., an observation was conducted of Resident #8 sitting in her room next to the window. Further observation revealed there was no privacy curtain attached to the track on the ceiling.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with a newly identified psychiatric diagnosis was referred for a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II evaluation as required for 1 (#51) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for PASRR. Review of the facility's undated Policy titled Resident Assessment- Coordination with PASRR Program revealed the following, in part: Policy: The facility coordinates assessments with preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR) program under Medicaid to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition receives care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. All applicants to this facility will be screened for serious mental disorders or intellectual disabilities and related conditions in accordance with the State's Medicaid rules for screening. U9. Any resident who exhibits a newly evident or possible…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's comprehensive person-centered care plan was implemented by failing to administer enteral feeding as ordered for 1 (#53) of 2 (#53 and #71) residents reviewed with enteral feeding. Findings: Review of Resident #53's Clinical Record revealed he admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses, which included Neurocognitive Disorder with Lewy Bodies, Gastrostomy Status, and Dysphagia. Review of Resident #53's Significant Change MDS with an ARD of 01/08/2025 revealed a BIMS interview was not conducted related to the resident was rarely/never understood. Review of Resident #53's current Care Plan revealed the following, in part: Problem: At risk for malnutrition related to PEG tube feedings; NPO (nothing by mouth) status. Goal: The resident will maintain weight through review date Interventions: 01/03/2025 - Diet changed to PEG tube feedings. Resident is now NPO. Review of Resident #53's Physician Orders dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received services as outlined in the comprehensive care plan which met professional standards of quality for 1 (#53) of 2 (#53 and #71) residents reviewed with enteral feeding. The facility failed to ensure S6RN: 1. Verified Resident #53's physician orders prior to enteral feeding administration; and 2. Accurately documented administration of Resident #53's enteral feeding. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Enteral Tube Feeding via Gravity revealed the following, in part: Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide nourishment to the resident who is unable to obtain nourishment orally. Preparation: 1. Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. 2. Review the resident's care plan and provide for any special needs of the resident. General Guidelines: 3. Check the enteral nutrition label against the order before administration. Review of the facility's undated policy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received enteral feedings as ordered to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 1 (#53) of 4 (#37, #53, #65, and #71) residents reviewed for nutrition and/or enteral feeding. Findings: Review of Resident #53's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses, which included Neurocognitive Disorder with Lewy Bodies, Gastrostomy Status, and Dysphagia. Further review of the Clinical Record revealed Resident #53's ideal body weight was 166 pounds. Review of Resident #53's Significant Change MDS with an ARD of 01/08/2025 revealed a BIMS interview was not conducted related to resident was rarely/never understood. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #53 had lost 5% or more in the last month or 10% or more in the last six months of body weight and was not on a physician-prescribed weight loss regimen. Resident #53 received 51% or more of nutrition through tube…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Medication rooms were free of expired supplements for 1 (MR3) of 2 (MR2 and MR3) medication rooms reviewed; 2. Medication carts were free of expired supplements for 1 (MC3) of 2 (MC1 and MC3) medication carts reviewed; 3. Medication carts were free of loose pills for 1 (MC1) of 2 (MC1 and MC3) medication carts reviewed; and 4. Insulin pens were labeled with an opened date on 1 (MC1) of 2 (MC1 and MC3) medication carts reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all of the 97 residents residing in the facility. Findings: Review of the undated facility policy titled Medications - Storage revealed the following, in part: The facility shall store drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 2. The nursing staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to ensure: 1. food was dated after opening; 2. food was properly sealed and stored; and 3. staff with facial hair wore a beard restraint. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 97 residents who received nourishment from the facility's kitchen. Findings: Review of the undated facility policy titled Storage: Dry Food revealed the following, in part: Procedure: 2. Keep all containers tightly closed from insects, rodents, and dust. Dry foods can be contaminated, even if they do not need refrigeration. Review of the undated facility policy titled Storage: Freezer revealed the following, in part: 2. Keep all frozen foods tightly wrapped or packaged to prevent freezer burn. 3. Label and date all items Review of the undated facility policy titled Storage: Refrigerator revealed the following, in part: 5. Store raw items separately if possible. 6. If raw foods must be kept in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RIGHTCARE HEALTH SERVICES — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA