Westwood Manor Nursing Home, INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 30 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 71.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 132 beds and averages 93.2 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 39 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.59 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen to prevent the likelihood of foodborne illnesses and failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 90 residents that received meals prepared in the kitchen. Findings: Review of an undated facility policy on 07/30/2025 at 8:20 a.m. titled, Storage: Freezer revealed the following part.2. Keep all frozen foods tightly wrapped or packaged to prevent freezer burn. 3. Label and date all items. Review of an undated facility policy on 07/30/2025 at 8:20 a.m. titled, Storage: Refrigerator revealed the following in part.7. Keep refrigerated food wrapped or covered and in sanitary containers. Observation on 07/28/2025 at 8:55 a.m. of the facility kitchen accompanied by S11 Dietary Manager revealed the following: Walk-In Refrigerator: 1. One opened, unsealed, and undated cardboard box of breakfast sausage patties (over 25 individual sausage patties).2. One opened, unsealed, and undated cardboard box of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received reasonable needs for 1 (Resident #32) of 1 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #32 received a Geriatric chair as requested.Findings:Review of the Facility's undated policy titled Accommodation of Needs read in part.Policy: The facility will treat each resident with respect and dignity and will evaluate and make reasonable accommodations for the individual needs and preferences of a resident, except when the health and safety of the individual or other residents would be endangered. 4. Based on individual needs and preferences, the facility will assist the resident in maintaining and/or achieving independent functioning, dignity, and well-being to the extent possible. Review of Resident #32's medical records revealed an admit date of 04/02/2024 with diagnoses that included: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Unspecified Osteoarthritis, Morbid Obesity, Muscle Spasms of Back, Chronic Pain Syndrome, and Restless Leg Syndrome. Review of Resident #32's Quarterly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to transmit an admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment within 14 days of completion for 1 (Resident #33) of 1 sampled residents with a MDS record over 120 days old. Findings:Review of the Facility's undated policy titled: MDS 3.0 Completion read in part Policy: Residents are assessed, using a comprehensive assessment process, in order to identify care needs and to develop an interdisciplinary care plan. 2. admission Assessment- completed 14 days of admission counting the day of admission as day #1. The admission assessment must be accepted with a transition time line of 14 days. Review of Resident #33's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/03/2025. Review of Resident #33's MDS on 07/29/2025 revealed the admission MDS with ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 07/09/2025 was open and had not been transmitted. An interview on 07/29/2025 at 2:10 p.m. with S10 LPN confirmed that Resident #33's admission MDS with ARD of 07/09/2025 should have been signed as completed and transmitted by 07/22/2025, but had not been.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's comprehensive care plan was revised after each assessment for 1 (Resident #22) of 30 sampled residents. Review of Resident #22's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/26/2018 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease, Epilepsy, Gastrostomy, and Quadriplegia. Review of Resident #22's Discharge with Return Anticipated MDS with ARD of 07/15/2025 revealed a BIMS Score was not conducted. Resident #22 did not receive Oxygen. Review of Resident #22's previous physician's orders revealed Oxygen at 2-4L NC PRN SOB and O2 sat below 95% RA as needed was discontinued on 01/29/2025.Review of Resident #22's care plan revealed the following interventions: Oxygen settings: O2 via NC at 2-4L PRN SOB or O2 less than 95% on RA; and Oxygen: Administer as ordered.Interview was conducted with S10 MDS and S13 MDS on 07/30/2025 at 1:35 p.m. S10 MDS revealed Resident #22 did not have an order for Oxygen, but was care-planned for Oxygen. S13 MDS confirmed Resident #22's care plan was not revised after each…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the Facility failed to ensure that a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene by failing to provide nail care for 1 (#5) out of 30 sampled residents. Findings:Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed an admit date of 05/01/2025 with a re-entry date of 06/20/2025 with diagnoses which included: Disruption of Dehiscence of Closure of Internal Operation (Surgical) Wound of Abdominal Wall Muscle or Fascia, Chronic Respiratory Failure, Partial Intestinal Obstruction, Severe Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, and Hypertensive Heart Disease without Heart Failure. Review of Resident #5's admission MDS with an ARD of 05/01/2025 revealed Resident #5 had a BIMs score of 6, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #5's Care Plan dated 05/02/2025 revealed in part. ADL assistance needed: Moderate assist needed with toileting, personal hygiene, and staff x 1 with transfers. Observation on 07/28/2025 at 10:30 a.m. revealed Resident #5's fingernails were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were not available for administration to residents in 1 (Room A) of 1 medication room checked for safe and secure storage.Observation of Room A on 07/29/2025 at 10:00 a.m. accompanied by S14 LPN revealed Room A was used to store medications and supplements to be provided to residents. Observation revealed 2 unopened bottles of Ocuvite Adult 50+ Soft Gels with an expiration date of 06/2025, and 3 DiabetiSource AC Complete Nutrition 250mL supplements with an expiration date of 05/23/2025. An interview was conducted at this time with S14 LPN who confirmed expired medications and supplements were in Room A, but should not have been.Interview with S3 ADON on 07/29/2025 at 10:45 a.m. confirmed expired medications and supplements should not have been in Room A, available for administration to residents, but were.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received and the facility provided liquids consistent with resident needs for 1 (Resident #52) resident investigated for hydration. The sample size was 30 residents.Review of Resident #52's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/16/2020 with diagnoses including, in part.Dementia, Mild Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, and Aphasia. Review of Resident #52's Quarterly MDS with ARD of 06/06/2025 revealed a BIMS Score of 99. Resident #52 required substantial/maximal assistance with eating and did not have a swallowing disorder. Review of Resident #52's active physician's orders revealed the following: 09/03/2024: 360mL fluid of choice po TID with med pass; and 09/03/2024: Give 360mL fluid of choice po BID at snack times. Review of Resident #52's care plan revealed the following: 12/01/2021: 360mL fluid of choice po TID with med pass; and 12/07/2021: Give 360mL fluid of choice po BID at snack times. Review of Resident #52's 07/2025 MAR revealed the following: 360mL fluid of choice po TID with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse were disposed of properly. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 95 residents who resided in the facility.Findings: Review of an undated facility policy on 07/30/2025 at 8:20 a.m. titled, Trash revealed the following part.All garbage and trash will be placed in a dumpster in a convenient area near the facility. The lid to the dumpster is to be kept closed at all times. Observation on 07/28/2025 at 9:36 a.m. of the facility dumpsters accompanied by S11 Dietary Manager and S12 Maintenance Supervisor revealed 3 facility dumpsters. Observed dumpster #1 with the top lid opened, dumpster #2 with the side lid open, and dumpster #2 with 1 full, large black garbage bag placed directly on the ground in front of the dumpster. Observed multiple pieces of debris/trash on the ground in the surrounding dumpster area such as straws, plastic lids, silver spoons, napkins, and other paper products. S12 Maintenance Supervisor revealed the facility occasionally has raccoons in the dumpster area and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a cognitively impaired resident was treated with respect and dignity, and cared for in a manner that promoted enhancement of his or her own quality of life for 1 (#96) of 2 (#45, #96) Residents reviewed for dignity in a total sample of 29. The facility failed to ensure Resident #96 was dressed appropriately. Findings: Review of Resident #96's EHR (Electronic Health Record) revealed an admit date of 01/10/2024 with diagnoses including in part . Hypertensive Heart Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 2, Gastrostomy Status, Parkinson's Disease, Adult Failure to Thrive, Major Depressive Disorder, Unspecified Severe Protein- Calorie Malnutrition, Anxiety Disorder, and Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Unspecified Cerebrovascular Disease. Review of Resident #96's Quarterly MDS with ARD of 04/17/2024 revealed Resident #96 was non-interviewable with a BIMS of 99 (unable to assess mental status). Resident #96 was dependent on staff for oral hygiene, toileting, showering/bathing, dressing upper and lower…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the Resident's right to formulate an advanced directive was properly reflected in the Resident's medical record for 1 (#96) of 2 (#96, #352) Residents reviewed for advance directives. The total sample size was 29. The facility failed to ensure all medical records regarding code status consistently reflected the Resident's wishes to be a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate). Findings: Review of Resident #96's EHR (Electronic Health Record) revealed an admit date of [DATE] with diagnoses including in part . Hypertensive Heart Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 2, Gastrostomy Status, Parkinson's Disease, Adult Failure to Thrive, Major Depressive Disorder, Unspecified Severe Protein- Calorie Malnutrition, Anxiety Disorder, and Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Unspecified Cerebrovascular Disease. Further review of Resident #96's EHR- Bed board revealed a code status of CPR. Review of Resident #96's Quarterly MDS with ARD of [DATE] revealed Resident #96 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RIGHTCARE HEALTH SERVICES — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $658K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA