Cherry Hill for Nursing and Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 42 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 37.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 127 beds and averages 111.7 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.15 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.77 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.24 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-01-15 · tag F0847 — pattern
  Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure arbitration agreements were signed by the resident or appropriate responsible party, and in a manner which was explained and understood by the resident or responsible party for four residents (R23, R35, R90, and R104) of reviewed for arbitration agreements. Findings include: On 1/13/26 at 10:38 AM, an entrance conference was completed with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) indicating the facility offers arbitration agreements. At that time, a request for the residents who entered into an agreement was requested. A review of the list noted 77 residents who had entered into arbitration agreements. R23A review of the arbitration agreement list revealed R23 had entered into an arbitration agreement. Further review revealed a signing date of 7/25/25 by someone other than the resident. A request for guardianship documentation was requested on 1/15/26 at 10:26am however, this was not received by end of survey. A review of R23's medical record revealed the resident was their own responsible party but had a significant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the cleanliness of the 200-hallway shower room for one (R105) and failed to maintain linen in good repair for one (R111) of three residents reviewed for the environment. Findings include: On 01/13/2026 at 11:04 AM, R105 was interviewed in their room and reported they did not want to use the 200-hallway shower room because they felt it had mold present that was visible along the lower rear wall seam between the wall and floor. On 01/14/2026 at 1:15 PM, observation of the 200-hallway shower room revealed: 1. A black substance along the seam of the back wall and the floor where there was a gap of approximately two-three inches in the tile leaving an area that was only grout. The black substance was easily wiped onto a napkin. 2. Two areas of broken tile on wall corners leaving exposed drywall approximately four to six inches wide. 3. A clump of brown substance that appeared to be feces and a large clump of hair. On 01/15/2026 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a low air loss mattress (LAL) was powered on for one resident (R59) of three reviewed for wound management. Findings include:On 01/13/2026 at 10:37 AM and 11:35 AM, R59 was observed to be in a LAL specialty bed. The bed had side bolsters and R59 was sunk low in the bed between the bolsters. An observation of the power unit for the bed revealed no active lights or display screen to indicate the mattress was powered on. R59 had a green wedge behind their torso and faced toward the right side of the bed. At 4:01 PM, the power unit for the mattress remained not powered on. The base of the mattress was firm and R59 reported they felt like they were laying on the frame and was adjusted their position slightly. R59 further noted they did not get out of bed often. On 01/14/2026 at 8:47 AM, R59 was observed to be in bed, sitting up and eating breakfast. The power unit for the bed had no lights or active display screen and was not powered on.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to float (positioning the heels to prevent sustained contact between the heels and the bed) a resident's heels per physician order for one (R19) of three resident's reviewed for pressure ulcer prevention. Findings include: Review of the medical record for R19 revealed they were admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Type-Two Diabetes Mellitus and Chronic Kidney Disease. Review of R19's Minimum Data Set (MDS) information indicated a history of facility-acquired pressure ulcers and the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8/15 indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Review of R19's current physician orders confirmed an active order stating Skin prep to bilateral heels, float heels while in bed. On 01/13/2026 at 1:47 PM, R19 was observed in bed. Their feet were laying directly on the mattress without any support to float the heels or any float boots in place. R19 was queried as to whether they knew if their…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to address the behavioral health needs of one resident (R23) of one reviewed for behavioral health resulting in an assault of another resident. Findings include: On 1/13/26 at 11:44 AM, R23 was observed lying in bed and asked about a recent incident involving their previous roommate and stated, [they] thought I was [their] whipping boy and I hit [them] with a weight. R23 did not provide any additional information regarding the incident.A review of R23's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on 7/23/25 with diagnoses which included Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis, and Hypertension. Further review revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required one-person assist with activities of daily living (ADL's).A review of the following progress notes revealed the following: 10/8/2025 08:30 (8:30am) Behavior Note: Patient has been observed being confused and aggressive. Patient was redirected several times because [they were] trying to climb out of bed and walk…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow pharmacy recommendations for one resident (R77) of five reviewed for Medication Regimen Reviews (MRRs). Findings include: A review of R77's monthly MRR's noted the following dates the resident had irregularities reported by the pharmacist: 5/19/25, 6/24/25, and 7/21/25. A review of the irregularities report for 5/19/25 indicated the following, Please ensure lab results for the following labs are completed and scanned into [electronic medical record] as ordered 4/14/25, as results could not be located in this resident's chart at the time of review, CMP and CBC (comprehensive metabolic panel and complete blood count), Fasting lipid panel (measures the amount of certain fat molecules in the blood), HgbA1c level (measures the amount of glucose in the blood). A review of the irregularities report dated for 6/24/25 indicated the following, Please ensure lab results for the following labs are completed and scanned into [electronic medical record] as ordered 4/21/25, as results could not be located in this resident's chart…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store medication not at the bedside for one resident (R50) of one resident reviewed for storage of drugs and biologicals.Findings include: On 1/13/26 at 9:30 AM, R50 was observed laying in their bed watching television. Their bed was cluttered with papers other items. A bag of cough drops, an over-the-counter inhaler, and two prescription inhalers were observed at the bedside. When asked about the medications at bedside R50 stated the nurse gave them to them.On 1/14/26 at 10:30 AM, R50 was observed sitting up on the side of their bed going through the clutter. Three inhalers were observed at the bedside.Record review on 1/15/26 revealed R50 was admitted into the facility on 2/25/23 with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD); anxiety disorder and acute cough. R50's most recent Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment revealed a score of 15/15 indicating intact cognition. Further review identified no active physician orders for R50 to self-medicate.01/15/2026 at 1:46 PM, an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0551 — isolated
  Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to MI00153028 and MI00153168. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to acknowledge and ensure the Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) was allowed to exercise the residents' rights for one resident (R901) out of three residents reviewed for resident rights exercised by their representative. Findings include: On 6/3/25 at 02:30 PM, an interview with DPOA A revealed they were told, when presenting to facility staff the DPOA paperwork, it was not valid because signatures on the papers were not notarized. Review of the document revealed a DPOA document containing two witness signatures, the resident signature, and the DPOA signature as prepared by a law firm, dated 3/30/21. DPOA A was advised by facility staff to provide the DPOA paperwork to the Social Worker the next business day. DPOA A further revealed they told the staff member, the current document had been in effect since 2021 (the signature date). On 6/3/25, a review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation refers to Intake MI00153374. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal and physical abuse by staff (Certified Nursing Assistant - CNA I) for one (R903) of three resident's reviewed for abuse. Findings include: A review of the Intake MI00153374 revealed: On 05/24/25 at about 4:00 PM, R903 approached the nurses' station with a packet of sweetener and requested assistance to open it. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E assisted R903 to open the packet. CNA K, CNA L, and CNA I were seated at the nurse station. R903 threw the open packet of sweetener over the nurses station towards CNA I. CNA I started to swear at R903. R903 was observed to stand up and R903 and CNA I then grabbed each other by the wrists over the nurses' station. Staff were then reported to have separated R903 and CNA I. On 6/04/25 at 11:30 PM and during the survey, R903 was observed to be walking round and round the halls talking appropriately with staff and other…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00153028. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for bladder incontinence with interventions to address resistance to toileting for one (R901) of two residents reviewed for care plans. Findings include: A review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R901 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following relevant diagnoses: Vascular Dementia, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, and a Cognitive Communication Deficit. A Brief Interview for Mental Status was conducted resulting in a score of 4/15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. R901 was dependent for activities of daily living, was incontinent of urine and R901 requires prompting and assistance for toileting. On 6/3/25 at approximately 2:56 PM, R901 was interviewed in their room with their Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) A. DPOA discussed R901's sometimes resistance to toileting and R901 is sometimes willing to walk to the bathroom with assistance. DPOA…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LME FAMILY HOLDINGS — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 91% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $615K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI