No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Liberty Center For Rehabilitation And Nursing

7310 Stenton Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19150 · For profit - Corporation · 94 certified beds · (215) 242-2727 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (215) 242-2727 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jun 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$8,827 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $8,827 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-18)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
345 E Mount Airy Ave · (215) 242-5000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rite Aid0.2 mi
8235 Stenton Ave · (215) 247-8535 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Acme0.5 mi
7700 Crittenden St · (215) 248-6490 · Call to confirm hours
Park
800 E Mermaid Ln · (215) 836-7600 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
8501 Stenton Ave · (215) 247-9487

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.7%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.0%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms35.3%10.8%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.3%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened1.7%17.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.8%20.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.6%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.8%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.9%17.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.3%68.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.0%22.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit4.4%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.861.621.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.581.181.80better

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 71 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

54.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
45.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 45.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 48 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF54.0%CMS range 43.5–67.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.8%CMS range 6.5–15.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge45.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge45.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge47.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.6%CMS range 3.9–10.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.001.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.41
RN hours/ resident / day
0.60
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.85
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.86
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.21
RN hoursweekends
45.2%
Total nursing turnover
30.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 94 beds and averages 89.7 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.86 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.85 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.02 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-14)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2025-06-05)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility documentation, and interviews with staff, it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate supervision consistent with the resident's needs, and professional standards of practice for an ambulatory resident diagnosed with dementia, with a history of wandering, and at risk for elopement. When not properly supervised, the resident eloped from the facility, and was found wandering the streets, for one of nine residents reviewed at risk for elopement (Resident R1). The deficiency was identified as Immediate Jeopardy past non-compliance. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Standard and Guidelines: Elopement and Wandering revised on, November 2023, stated the facility will identify residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and strive to prevent harm while maintaining the least restrictive environment for residents. Care plans will include strategies and interventions to maintain the resident's safety. Review of Resident R1's clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, review of facility policy, and review of facility documentation it was determined that the facility did not ensure that a complete and thorough investigation related to abuse allegation was completed for one of twenty residents reviewed. (Resident R83)Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Program, review date March 2017, revealed as the Policy Statement Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual or physical abuse, and physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's symptoms. The policy continues, stating (administration will): 6. Identify and assess all possible incidents of abuse; 7. Investigate and report any allegations of abuse within timeframes as required by federal requirement; 8. Protect residents during abuse investigations; 9. Establish and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility policy and interview with staff, it was determined facility did not implement and maintain an effective infection prevention control program related to water management program and enhanced barrier precautions on one of four units observed. (Unit C)Findings include: Review of facility policy 'Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) Policy and Procedure,' effective date April 1, 2024, indicates that EBP are indicated for residents with any of the following: wounds or indwelling medical devices, regardless of MDRO (Multi Drug Resistant Organism) colonization status, infection or colonization with an MDRO when contact precautions do not otherwise apply. Further review of policy indicates that effective implementation of EBP requires staff training on the proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE) and the availability of PPE and hand hygiene supplies at the point of care. eview of facility policy 'Legionella Water Management Program,' revised July 2017, indicates that the purpose of water management program is to identify areas in the water…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, and interviews with staff it was determined that the facility did not ensure a clean, comfortable, homelike environment for two of four nursing units reviewed. (C-Wing and D-Wing)Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Quality of Life-Homelike Environment revised May 2017 states, Policy Statement- Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment and encouraged to use their personal belongings to the extent possible. Further review of the policy states, 2. The facility staff and management shall maximize, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. These characteristics include: a. Clean, sanitary, and orderly environment. Review of facility policy 'Quality of Life - Homelike Environment,' revised May 2017, states that the facility staff and management shall maximize, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility documentation, and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility to implement its abuse policy related to investigation and protection of residents, and to immediately protect a resident involved in resident to resident sexual abuse for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R83).Findings include:Review of facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Program, review date March 2017, revealed as the Policy Statement Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual or physical abuse, and physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's symptoms. Review of Resident R83's clinical record revealed that the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Major Depressive Disorder (severe, often recurring mood disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility policy and interview with staff, it was determined that facility did not ensure to develop and implement a resident centered care plan for one of 20 residents reviewed related to psychosocial health. (Resident R21)Findings include: Review of facility policy 'Comprehensive Person - Centered Care Plans,' revised December 2016, indicates that the comprehensive, person -centered care plan will describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable , physical mental, and psychosocial well-being and describe any specialized services to be provided as a result of Preadmission Screening and Resident review (PASARR) recommendations. Review of Resident R21's clinical record revealed medical history of schizophrenia (mental disease characterized by loss of reality contact), and cerebral infarction (stroke). Review of Resident R21's 'psychotropic medications review,' completed on March 10, 2026, revealed Resident R21 received the following medications for Schizophrenia: Risperdal 0.5 milligrams (mg),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews with staff, and review of facility documentation it was determined that the facility did not ensure to update and implement a comprehensive centered care plan related to behaviors for one of twenty residents reviewed. (Resident R46)Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered last revised December 2016 states, Policy Statement- A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Further review of the facility policy states, g. Incorporate identified problem areas; h. Incorporate risk factors associated with identified problems. Review of facility documentation revealed Resident R46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnosis: Type Two Diabetes (a chronic condition where your body either resists the effects of insulin or doesn't produce enough to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of clinical records and review of facility policy, it was determined that facility did not ensure to provide activities of daily living (ADL's) assistance for two of 20 residents reviewed (Residents R34, R41)Findings include: Review of facility policy 'Activities of Daily Living Support,' revised March 2018, indicates that residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.Further review of policy revealed that appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADL's independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with:Hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care)Elimination (toileting) Review of Resident R34's clinical record revealed medical history of need for assistance with personal care, schizophrenia (mental disease characterized by loss of reality contact), lack of coordination, muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview with resident, review of clinical records, review of facility policy and facility provided documentation, it was determined that facility did not ensure to provide adequate supervision to prevent an accident for two residents and one employee (Resident R7, R46, and Employee E19)Findings include: Review of facility policy 'Abuse Prevention Program,' revised December 2016, indicates that as part of the resident abuse prevention, the administration will develop and implement policies and procedures to aid our facility in preventing abuse, neglect or mistreatment of our residents. Review of facility policy 'Behavioral Assessment, Intervention and Monitoring,' revised December 2016, indicates that the interdisciplinary team will evaluate behavioral symptoms in residents to determine the degree of severity, distress and potential safety risk to the resident, and develop a plan of care accordingly. Further review of policy indicated that safety strategies will be implemented immediately if necessary to protect the resident and others from harm. Review of Resident R7's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of resident clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility did not ensure a resident received appropriate behavioral health management to maintain the highest practicable well-being for one of twenty residents reviewed (Resident R46).Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, Behavioral Assessment, Interventions and Monitoring last revised December 2016 states, Policy Interpretation and Implementation- General Guidelines 1. Behavior is the response of an individual to a wide variety of factors. These factors may include medical, physical, functional, psychosocial, emotional, psychiatric, or environmental causes. Further review of the policy states, Assessment.3. The nursing staff will identify, document, and inform the physician about specific details regarding changes in an individual's mental status, behavior, and cognition, including: a. Onset, duration, intensity and frequency of behavioral symptoms. 4. New onset…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, facility did not ensure proper storage of controlled substance medications for 1 of 2 medication rooms. (1st Floor)Findings Include: Observation on May 13, 2026 at 10:15 AM of the 1st floor medication room revealed only medication cart nurses and the Director of Nursing (DON), Employee E2, have keys to the medication room and to the medication room's refrigerator, with controlled substances stored inside a separate box within the refrigerator. Further observation revealed drawer containing controlled substances inside the refrigerator lacked permanent affixing to the refrigerator and was able to be removed from the refrigerator. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), Employee E2, at the time of observation revealed her statement that only the nurses and I (DON) have access to the controlled substances and it was due to the fact that the inside shelf was made of glass. Further interview with the DON, Employee E2, at this time revealed her confirmation that this would not prevent staff diversion. 28 Pa. Code 211.9 Pharmaceutical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolated
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the facility assessment and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility did not ensure active involvement of direct care staff and input from residents, resident representatives, and family members in the development and revision of the facility assessment. Additionally, the facility failed to identify within the facility assessment an accurate resident population with mental health and substance abuse diagnosis. Findings include:Review of facility policy 'Facility Assessment,' updated July 14, 2025, states that the purpose of the assessment is to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. The assessment is used to make decisions about direct care of staff needs, as well as capabilities to provide services to the residents in facility. The facility assessment is used to ensure that each resident is provided with care that allows the resident to maintain or attain their highest practicable physical,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean and homelike environment for three of four nursing units observed (B, C and D units).Findings include: Interview on April 28, 2026, at 9:29 a.m. Resident R1 stated that the room was in disrepair, including broken furniture, soiled and broken privacy curtains, soiled walls and broken baseboards. Observation, at the time of the interview, of room B16, revealed the following: The dresser for bed 1 was tattered and worn; the dresser for bed 3 was also tattered and had broken drawer handles; the air conditioning unit in the room had insulation that was falling out, creating an opening that would allow pests and debris to enter the room; the air conditioning unit's filter was caked with dirt and debris; the baseboard behind bed 1 was peeling away from the wall and exposing a hole that would allow pests and debris to enter the room; the wall behind bed 3 was soiled with a brown substance; the privacy curtain for bed 3 was soiled, torn and unable to close…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, observations, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared in accordance with standards for food service safety. Findings Include: Review of facility policy Food Storage revealed temperatures for the freezer should be 0 degrees or below and must be recorded daily. A tour of the main kitchen was conducted on June 2, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. with the Food Service Director, Employee E27, which revealed the following: Observations in the outbuilding containing the walk-in freezer revealed a steel entry door that was not closed properly, and the bottom of the door was rusted through and did not seal. There was significant dirt and debris built-up within the outbuilding containing the walk-in freezer. Observations inside the walk-in freezer revealed it had a significant build up of ice on the outside of the fan and ceiling. The hot dogs and bread were not frozen solid to touch which indicated that these food items had began to defrost. The thermometer on the outside of the freezer was reading 32…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview with staff and residents, it was determined facility did not ensure the facility was maintained in a clean, safe, and homelike environment on two out of four nursing units observed (A-wing, C-Wing, D-Wing, and Dining Room). Findings include: Review of facility policy 'Quality of Life - Homelike Environment,' revised May 2017, indicates that the facility staff and management shall maximize, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, home-like setting. The characteristics include: a.Clean, sanitary and orderly environment; e. clean bed and bath linens that are in good condition Observations on Monday, June 2, 2025 at 10:00 am, on wing C, revealed gnats in room C-12, as well as used cups, excess food crumbs on floor, dirty bedside tables, used utensils and used apple sauce cups on bed side tables. Room C-12 was noted to have foul urine odor. Further observations on wing-D, near room D-19, revealed a large bin with used breakfast cups/plates, gnats. Further observations in room D-21 revealed used portable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-05 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, observations, and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to serve meals timely for one of three dining observations (June 3, 2025, breakfast meal). Findings Include: Review of facility documentation Mealtimes revealed breakfast is scheduled to be served at 8:00 a.m. Observations on June 3, 2025, at 9:26 a.m. revealed seven residents were still waiting for breakfast to be served. Resident R20 and R36 complained of being hungry. Observations on June 3, 2025, at 9:30 a.m. revealed dietary staff just began to plate meal trays from the steam table in the 1st floor dining room. Interview with the Registered Dietitian, Employee E8, confirmed breakfast was late due to dietary employees not showing up for work. Interview on June 3, 2025, at 11:30 a.m. during the group meeting with alert and oriented Resident R20, R29, R40, and R22 revealed meals are not served in accordance with posted meal times which reportedly interferes with being able to develop a consistent routine for residents. 28 Pa. Code 201.14 (a) Responsibility of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-05 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview with staff and residents as well as review of facility provided documentation, it was determined facility did not ensure to maintain effective pest control program on two out of four units observed (Units, A, C, and D). Findings include: Review of facility policy 'Pest control,' revised May 2008, indicates that facility shall maintain an effective pest control program, and garbage and trash are not permitted to accumulate and are removed from facility daily. Maintenance services assist, when appropriate and necessary, in providing pest control services. Observations on Monday, June 2nd,2025, at 10:00 am, C-unit, revealed excess trash, gnats, food crumbs in room C-12; used cups, used apple sauce cups, dirty bed side tables, used utensils. Further observations on C-unit revealed a large bin near room D-19, with used breakfast utensils, cups and plates with gnats flying around. Further observations revealed excess trash on floor in room D-26. Further observations on D-unit,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical record, observations, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain dignity for one of eight residents during dining (Resident R70). Findings Include: Review of Resident R70's physician order summary revealed a diet order dated April 7, 2025, that the resident was NPO (nothing by mouth for food or drinks). Review of Resident R70's comprehensive care plan dated April 16, 2025, revealed the resident was allowed pudding or applesauce at lunch time only with specific feeding instructions. Continued review of Resident R70's comprehensive care plan dated December 16, 2024, revealed the resident was dependent on staff for eating, dressing, and mobility. Observations on June 4, 2025, at 12:45 p.m. revealed Resident R70 was in the 1st floor activity room sitting in a geri chair (specialized medical recliner) surrounded by about 5 other residents who were consuming lunch. Resident R70 did not have any pudding or applesauce provided during dining. Interview on June 4, 2025, at 12:45 p.m. with Nurse Aide, Employee E20, confirmed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, observation, and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from neglect for one of 8 residents reviewed relating to one employee not providing supervision and care for one resident over a period of two scheduled shifts.(resident R16) Findings include: Review of policy titled Abuse Prevention program dated January 1st, 2022, revealed residents have the right to be free from abuse common neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes neglect which is defined as a failure to provide goods and services as necessary to avoid physical harm, mental anguish, or mental illness. The following are some examples of neglect and signs and symptoms of neglect that should be promptly recorded reported some signs of neglect are dehydration, poor hygiene, inappropriate clothing, inadequate provision of care, caregiver indifference to resident's personal care and needs, leaving someone unattended who needs supervision. Review of facility documentation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview with residents and staff as well as review of clinical records, it was determined facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive resident centered care plan related to maintaining resident's hearing and nutrition for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident R25) Findings include: Review of facility's policy Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised March 2022, indicates that the comprehensive, person-centered care plan: b. describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being and c. reflects currently recognized standards of practice for problem areas and conditions. Review of resident R25's clinical record revealed an [AGE] year old male resident, awake, alert and oriented to self only, with medical diagnosis of psychomotor deficit (impaired motor function accompanied by cognitive or mental slowing), and cognitive communication deficit (difficulty with communication due to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and review of clinical records, it was determined facility did not maintain proper grooming and personal hygiene for two of 19 residents reviewed (Resident R26, R52) Findings include: Review of facility's policy 'Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) , Supporting,' revised March 2018, indicates that residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Further review of policy indicates that if residents with cognitive impairment or dementia resist care, staff will attempt to identify the underlying cause of the problem and not just assume the resident is refusing or declining care. Approaching the resident in a different way or at a different time, or having another staff member speak with the resident may be appropriate. Review of R26's clinical record revealed an [AGE] year old male resident with medical diagnosis of need for assistance with personal care,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview with staff and resident, as well as review of clinical records, it was determined facility did not ensure that resident received proper treatment and assistive device to maintain hearing abilities for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident R25) Findings include: According to §483.25(a)(2) - Assistive devices to maintain hearing include, but are not limited to, hearing aids, and amplifiers. The facility's responsibility is to assist residents and their representatives in locating and utilizing any available resources (e.g., Medicare or Medicaid program payment, local health organizations offering items and services which are available free to the community) for the provision of the services the resident needs. This includes making appointments and arranging transportation to obtain needed services. In situations where the resident has lost their device, facilities must assist residents and their representative in locating resources, as well as in making appointments, and arranging for transportation to replace the lost devices. Review of R25's clinical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility policies and interviews with staff it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe environment free from accident hazards for one resident related to hazardous material endangering the environment and welfare for two of two residents reviewed. (Resident R44 and R68) Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Quality of Life - Home like Environment revised May 2017, revealed residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable in home like environment and encourage to use their personal belongings to the extent possible. Review of residents R 44's quarterly minimum data set (MDS - a federal mandated assessment tool for all residents) dated February 21st, 2025, revealed that the resident entered the facility June 11, 2024, with diagnosis including cerebrovascular Accident (CVA_ stroke) and dementia (loss of cognitive function) with a brief interview of mental status (BIMS) score of three indicating significant cognitive decline. This resident requires substantial assistance for hygiene, toileting, dressing, sit to stand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide culturally competent, trauma care in accordance with professional standards of practice, accounting for residents past experiences and preferences in order to eliminate and or mitigate triggers that may cause re- traumatization of the resident for two of two residents sampled. (Residents R28 and R30) Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Trauma Informed Care revealed guidelines for implementing trauma informed care in long term care facilities to support residents and staff who may have experience trauma. The goal is to provide care that is safe, respectful, and responsive to the effects of trauma while fostering a supportive environment. Care will be provided in a manner that prevents retraumatization and promotes healing and empowerment . This will be done through staff training, resident assessment and care planning, to develop individual care plans that account for trauma related needs, preferences and triggers , implement measures to minimize…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, observations, and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to serve the posted menu for one of three dining observations (June 2, 2025, lunch meal). Findings Include: Observations on June 2, 2025, at 1:00 p.m. revealed the posted lunch menu was a pork chop topped with apple marinade. Furter observations on June 2, 2025, at 1:00 p.m. revealed Resident R20 was served a plain pork chop without any gravy or marinade. Resident R20 subsequently requested gravy for the pork chop. Interview on June 2, 2025, at 1:05 p.m. with Activity Aide, Employee E23, confirmed what was on the posted menu and further confirmed Resident R20 did not get gravy on the pork chop. Activity Aide, Employee E23, went to kitchen for gravy but reported that the kitchen did not have any. Interview on June 2, 2025, at 1:35 p.m. with the Cook, Employee E24, confirmed the apple marinade was not served with the pork for lunch per the posted menu, Further interview revealed there was no applesauce left to use for medication pass and therefore…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility provided documentation, observations , and interview with staff, it was determined facility did not use its hoursekeeping resources effectively and effeciently to provide services in compliance with accepted professional standards and principles that apply to professionals providing services in the facility related to housekeeping services. Findings include: Review of facility's assessment indicates that the purpose of the assessment is to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. Facility assessment is to be used to make decisions about facility's direct care staff needs, as well as capabilities required to provide services to the residents in facility. Further review of facility's assessment indicates that using a competency-based approach focuses on ensuring that each resident is provided care that allows the resident to maintain or attain their highest practicable, physical, mental, and psychosocial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interview with staff and residents, it was determined facility did not implement and maintain an effective infection prevention control program related to water management, meal service and hygiene care for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident R25) Findings include: Review of facility policy 'Infection Prevention and Control Program,' revised October 2018, indicates that important facets of infection prevention include instituting measures to avoid complications or dissemination. Further review of policy indicates that the infection preventionist or designee shall monitor the effectiveness of our infection prevention and control work practices and protective equipment. This includes but is not necessarily limited to: a. surveillance of workplace to ensure that established infection prevention and control practices are observed and protective clothing and equipment are provided and properly used. Interview with resident R25 on Monday, June 2nd, 2025, at 10:30 am, revealed his concern of clogged sink in his restroom, stated that it has been clogged for a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility failed to maintain essential kitchen equipment in safe, operating condition. Findings Include: Review of facility policy Food Storage revealed temperatures for the freezer should be 0 degrees or below and must be recorded daily. A tour of the main kitchen was conducted on June 2, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. with the Food Service Director, Employee E27, which revealed the following: Observations inside the walk-in freezer revealed it had a significant build-up of ice on the outside of the fan and ceiling. The hot dogs and bread were not frozen solid to touch which indicated that these food items had begun to defrost. The thermometer on the outside of the freezer was reading 32 degrees Fahrenheit (F), and the thermometer on the inside of the freezer was reading 28 degrees F. Per an interview with the Food Service Director, Employee E27, the morning cook had reported that the freezer temporarily turned off. The facility had no log or documentation to show the ongoing monitoring of the freezer temperature and its components. Observations of the dish machine revealed when in use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a Level ll PASARR was conducted for residents with mental disorders as required for four of four residents reviewed. (Residents R1, R3, R20 and R36). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Patient Access to Service and Record (PASR) Policy, not dated, revealed that the purpose of The PASARR screening is to ensure that individuals with mental illness and or intellectual disabilities are appropriately evaluated and placed in skilled nursing facilities with access to necessary services in compliance with federal and state regulations. Further review of the facility policy revealed the process of the PASARR evaluation begins with a preadmission screening, all prospective residents will undergo a PASARR screening prior to admission, if an individual level 1 screening indicates a potential mental illness, a level ll evaluation will be completed. admission to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Review of clinical record, review of facility policy and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided with education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of influenza immunization for three of three residents (Residents R85, R8 and R17). Findings: Review facility policy on Influenza Vaccine revealed that under Section Policy Statement, all residents and employees who have no medical contraindications to the vaccine will be offered the influenza vaccine annually to encourage and promote the benefits associated with vaccination against influenza. The facility shall provide pertinent information about the significant risks and benefits of vaccines to staff and residents or residents legal representatives. For example, risk factors that have been identified for specific age groups or individuals with risk factors such as such as allergies and pregnancy. Under section Policy Interpretation and Implementation. #1 Between October 1st and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-01 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a safe, functional, and sanitary environment for residents, staff, and the public on four out of four nursing units. (A, B, C, D nursing units) Findings include: On July 29, 2024, from 10:33 a.m. to 11:06 a.m. observations were conducted on the D unit revealed the following: Room D15 had no baseboard from the door to the bedside dresser, the room had a strong urine smell and sticky floors. Room D25 bed by the window had a missing shelf from the dresser, large, ripped cardboard box was on the floor with the box being overloaded with random resident's items in the box. Room D14 window bed had boxes and random bags on the floor which cluttered the pathway to get around the resident's rooms. Room D17 there was stool in the bathroom floor and all around the toilet, the bed next to the door had no baseboard from the door to the bed dresser. The room had sticky floors, strong stool smell in the room. Resident's closet did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, reviewof clinical records, facility documentation, staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from abuse for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident R137). Findings include: A review of the clinical record indicated Resident's R137 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of severe intellectual disability (previously known as mental retardation characterized by limitation in intellectual functioning and adoptive behavior), restlessness and agitation, psychotic disorder with delusion, autism (autism spectrum disorder known as developmental disorder and effects communication, behaviors and social interaction), mood disorder. Review of Resident R137's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated May 22, 2024, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 10 which indicated that the resident was moderate impairment. A facility investigation dated June 5, 2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, resident and staff interviews and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a complete and though investigation to rule out abuse related to one of one allegation of potential sexual abuse. (Resident R11) Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Program dated January 1, 2022, revealed the primary purpose of the policy is for the residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. The following implementations are indicated in the prevention program; Separate the residents, identify what happened, notify each resident's representative of the incident ;review the events with the Nursing Supervisor and Director of Nursing, consult with the Attending Physician to identify treatable conditions such as acute psychosis that may have caused or contributed to the problem; make any necessary changes in the care plan approaches to any or all of the involved…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the environment remained free of accident hazards for one out of the 37 residents reviewed and had residents would have appropriate supervision. (Resident R30) Findings include: A review of the clinical record indicated Resident R30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnosis schizophrenia ( chronic and severe mental disorder which includes hallucination, delusion, disorganized thinking, agitation or erratic behaviors) and major depressive disorder (feeling sadness, loss of interest, significant change in weight or appetite, feeling of worthlessness, difficult concentrating or making decisions). Review of Resident R30's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated May 3, 2024, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 which indicated that the resident was cognitively intact. A comprehensive care plan was developed on June 9, 2022 which revealed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's medication regime was free from potentially unnecessary medications for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 68). Findings include: Facility policy titled Policy for Psychotropic Use in Long-Term Care (LTC), indicated that The facility will adhere to all relevant federal, state, and local regulations regarding the use of psychotropic medications in LTC settings. Clinical record review revealed Resident R68 was admitted to the facility February 09, 2022, with a diagnosis that included but not limited to Cerebral Infarction (disruption of blood supply to the brain that causes brain tissue death), Schizophrenia (mental health condition that affects how people think, feel, and behave), and Altered Mental Status. Review of Resident R68's medication orders revealed a physician order initiated June 28, 2024 to administer Ativan 0.5 mg (anti-anxiety medication) orally (by mouth) every four hours as needed for anxiety. The medication order indicated a stop date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, review of facility policy, observation, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals are stored and labeled in accordance with professional standards. For one of eighteen residents reviewed. (Resident R40). Findings include: Review of the facility policy and storage of medication revealed that under section policy statement, the facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure and orderly manner under section Policy Interpretation and Implementation #1. Drugs and biologicals used in the facility are stored in locked compartments under proper temperature, light and humidity controls. #3 The nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. #4. Drug containers that have missing, incomplete, improper, or incorrect labels are returned to the pharmacy for proper labeling before storing. #8 compartments, including but not limited to drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to assess the need for specialized occupational therapy services according to the professional standards of practice for one out of one resident reviewed for rehabilitation services (Resident R18). Findings include: Review of facility policy Standards and Guidelines: Restorative Nursing Services dated August, 2022, revealed that To promote the resident's optimum function, a restorative nursing program may be developed by proactively identifying, care planning, and monitoring of a resident's assessments and indicators, Restorative nursing program refers to interventions that promote the resident's ability to adopt and adjust to living as independently and safely as possible. This concept actively focuses on achieving and maintaining optimal physical, mental and psychosocial functioning. Restorative programs may be initiated by nursing and/or therapy. A review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0882 — isolated
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a designated infection prevention (IP) works at the facility focusing only on infection control at least part time as required one or more individuals servicing as infection Preventionist responsible for the facility's infection prevention plan. Finding include: Review of facility documentation identified the Director of Nursing (DON) fulfilled the job of Infection Preventionist. The DON works full time and was unable to provide valid proof that additional part time hours focusing only on infection control were completed in addition to his/her full time DON duties. Review of the Infection preventionist (IP) job description revealed that the IP is responsible for the activities aimed at healthcare associated infections. The responsibilities include collecting, analyzing health data, and interpreting, implementing, and evaluating public health practices. The IP will conduct education and training on healthcare associated infections for staff and management. Interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations of the food and nutrition department, and interview with staff, it had been determined that the facility failed to maintain essential food service equipment in a safe operating condition relating to a gas stove control knobs and kitchen exhaust fan. Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Supplies and Equipment, Environmental Services revised February 2009, revealed equipment must be always ready for use at all times. An initial tour of the main kitchen conducted on July 29, 2024, at 09:35 AM with employee E 25 with Dietary director, revealed the facility had five refrigerators, four are functioning and one is out of order, and a gas oven/ grill with no knobs to be used for igniting the flame and controlling the amount gas to the range for temperature adjustment. Interview with Employee E17 on July 30, 2024, at 8:10 a.m. during breakfast preparation revealed that for an individual to use the stove without any knobs, in the kitchen there is a plastic knob on the shelf to be placed over the valve and turn. Employee E17 then demonstrated the knob, which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature (second floor nursing unit). Findings Include: Interview with Resident R2, on April 30, 2024, at 11:30 a.m. revealed that the meat consistency is too chewy. I cannot swallow any of the meat because it is a weird texture. Interview with Resident R1, on April 30, 2024, at 12:00 p.m. revealed that the protein source (meat) served at the facility is very tough to chew. Interview with Resident R3, on April 30, 2024, at 12:30 p.m. revealed that the meat served for lunch is tough. Observations of dining conducted on the second-floor dining room, on April 30, 2024, at 1:00 p.m. revealed that the burger patty melts (beef patty covered with melted cheese) were pink in color and appeared undercooked. Interview with the Director of Nursing at time of observation confirmed this observation. Interview with the server, Employee E5, at the time of observation confirmed that the beef patties were pink in color…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, reviews of clinical records and review of facility policies and procedures, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate treatment, assessment and monitoring for the care and maintenance of an intravenous catheter in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of 7 residents reviewed (Resident CL1). Findings include: According to the standards of nursing practice guidelines in the Journal of the American Nurse's Association, dated November 2013, complications of a PICC line includes, but is not limited to catheter-tip migration (assessed by external length of the catheter-amount of catheter tubing that is visible outside of the vein moves from original insertion and may cause medical complications). Review of facility policy, Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters, revised May 18, 2020, indicated that the medical doctor must be notified immediately if changes in the length of the catheter exiting from the insertion site occurs. Review of Resident CL1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, reviews of policies and procedures and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for skin alterations and skin disorders for one of three residents reviewed. (Resident Cl1) Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled comprehensive person-centered care plans, dated March 2022 revealed that the interdisciplinary care team was responsible for development of a care plan for each resident with measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs. The resident and his/her family or legal representative was to participate in the care planning process. The care plan was to describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Care plan interventions were required to address the underlying source of the problem areas not just the symptoms or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$8,827 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $8,827 — penalty dated 2024-01-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LME FAMILY HOLDINGS — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 52.9+2.1 vs chain
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BLES HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 05/14/2018
BE SMARTS TROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/14/2018
BFSNMC LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/14/2018
HAMILTON 3P LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/14/2018
HMSNMC LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/14/2018
LAHASKY FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/14/2018
BORENSTEIN, PHILLIPIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 05/14/2018
LEWIS, STEVENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/14/2018
FEUER, SAMUELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/14/2018
KATZ, LARRYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/14/2018
LESHKOWITZ, ELIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/14/2018
BRAUNSTEIN, BARRYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/14/2018
KNOBEL, ABRAHAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/10/2024
GEARY PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/14/2018
GPH PHILADELPHIA LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/14/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+12.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$526K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 85%Medicare 8%Other / private 8%

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $526K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$302per resident / day
operating cost
$9,187per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$347per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395764. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next