Holland Center For Rehabilitation And Nursing
280 Middle Holland Road, Holland, PA 18966 · For profit - Partnership · 66 certified beds · (215) 322-6100 Medicare only — no Medicaid
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $36,186 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-12)
- nursing-staff turnover (72%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 0.0% | 16.8% | 15.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 14.6% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 11.1% | 10.8% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 3.1% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.1% | 20.0% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.0% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.9% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.6% | 68.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 31.3% | 22.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.5% | 9.5% | 12.0% | typical |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
52.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 402 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 49.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 93 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.81 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 52.3%CMS range 46.2–56.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.7%CMS range 9.4–14.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 49.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 57.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 47.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.2% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.4%CMS range 5.4–10.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.12 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 66 beds and averages 51.7 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.01 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.92 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.73 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.12 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.02 to 0.66 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 72% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
40 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record, review of facility policies, review of documentation, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to timely assess a resident for respiratory distress and failed to ensure that emergency transportation services were provided in a timely manner for one of 13 residents reviewed (Resident R158). This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for Resident R158 who experienced a change in condition related to respiratory distress and did not receive a timely nursing assessment and was not transferred in a timely manner to emergency room and subsequently died. (Resident R158) Findings include: Review of facility policy Change in Condition, revised [DATE], revealed that The nurse will notify the resident's Attending Physician or physician on call when there has been a(an): significant change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental condition; need to transfer the resident to a hospital/treatment center. The nurse will confirm with the physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-01-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of information submitted by the facility, hospital records, clinical records, policy and procedures, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident received adequate assistance and supervision with assistive devices to prevent accidents for one of eight residents reviewed for falls and functional abilities. Resident CL1 fell during an attempted improper transfer with staff causing the resident actual harm. (Resident CL1).Findings include:Review of the facility's undated policy and procedure titled Comprehensive person-centered care plans revealed it was the responsibility of the interdisciplinary care team to develop and implement a care plan for each resident with measurable objectives and time frames to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs. The policy indicated that the care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment. The policy also said…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a complete and thorough investigation was completed for allegations of potential abuse and neglect for 1 out of 2 residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Abuse Prevention Program, with a review date of 11/30/22 indicated that all abuse neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source (abuse) shall be promptly reported . and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of abuse investigations will also be reported.Review of Resident R1's May 2026 physician orders included the following diagnoses: atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm which can cause fatigue, heart palpitations, shortness of breath, and dizziness), high blood pressure, osteoarthritis (aging and wear and tear on a joint); acute pulmonary edema (fluid accumulation in the lungs); chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a group…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately update the State Survey Agency on the outcome of an investigation for one of two residents reviewed (Resident R56). Findings include: Review of Resident R56's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of encephalopathy (condition that affects how the brain works, causing confusion, memory problems, or changes in behavior due to illness, injury, or toxins), asthma, and muscle weakness. Review of information submitted by the Department, dated February 16, 2026, revealed on February 16, 2026 Resident R56 asked to be taken to the bathroom. CNA took the resident into the bathroom. At the time resident was in her wheelchair. During the transfer, resident stated her legs were getting weak and resident was lowered to the floor by CNA. Review of facility investigation follow up submitted revealed an x-ray was completed and revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure safety interventions for falls were in place for one of three residents reviewed for falls (Resident R7).Findings include:Clinical record review revealed Resident R7 was admitted to the facility December 28, 2025 with a diagnosis of cerebral infarction (type of stroke that happens when blood flow to part of the brain is blocked, causing brain cells to be damaged or die), muscle weakness, and lack of coordination. Review of Resident R7's clinical record revealed an order, dated January 17, 2026, for floor mats to be down when the resident is in bed. Review of Resident R7's physician notes, dated April 10, 2026, revealed Resident R7 requires full assistance with ADLs. Maintain strict fall precautions and safety measures (e.g., fall mats).Observation on April 30, 2026 at approximately 09:30 a.m. revealed Resident R7 lying in bed and no floor mats in place Further observation on May 01, 2026 at approximately 8:40 a.m. revealed Resident R7 lying in bed with no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and interview with staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure pain medication was administered in accordance with the physician's order for two of two residents reviewed for pain management. (Resident R20 and Resident R27)Findings Include:Review of Resident R20's clinical record revealed Resident R20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of cirrhosis of liver (condition where the liver becomes scarred and damaged over time, making it harder for the liver to work properly), lack of coordination, and rheumatoid arthritis (long-term disease where the body's immune system attacks the joints, causing pain, swelling, stiffness, and sometimes joint damage). Review of Resident R20's clinical record revealed physician's order for Oxycodone 10 mg milligrams to be given every 6 hours as needed for severe pain for 14 days, pain scale 7-10. Review of Resident R20's April 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that the as needed pain medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility policy, and interview with staff , it was determined that the facility failed to provide culturally competent, trauma care in accordance with professional standards of practice, accounting for the resident's past experiences and preferences in order to eliminate and/or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for two of two residents sampled for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). (Resident R4 and R18).Findings include:Review of facility policy Trauma-Informed Care, no date, revealed the facility is committed to incorporating trauma-informed care practices into all aspects of its operations, recognizing the widespread impact of trauma and understanding pathways to recovery. Care will be provided in a manner that prevents re-traumatization and promotes healing and empowerment. Further review of facility policy revealed the facility will incorporate trauma screening into resident assessments to identify potential trauma histories and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of clinical records, review of facility documentation and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure skilled competencies were completed for three of six nursing personnel files reviewed (Employee E5, Employee E6 and Employee E7). Findings include:Review of facility contract with Nursing Agency, dated February 19, 2024, revealed under Supervision and Safety of Professionals: As between the parties, client (facility) and not Nurse Agency, shall be soley responsible for supervising and ensuring the safety of professionals while they are present at any of the Client's facilities. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing. Client shall: (i) provide all necessary and appropriate training and orientation materials to professionals, including, as applicable, client's policies and procedures regarding injury and illness prevention, fire safety, administering medications, charting and recordkeeping, and patient rights. During an interview with Employee E4 on April 30, 2026 at 8:52 a.m., revealed that Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews with staff, and clinical record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were accurately documented for 4 of four residents reviewed. (Resident R20, Resident R27, Resident R34, Resident R61) Findings include:Review of facility policy titled, Administering Medication, revised April 2020, revealed As required or indicated for a medication, the individual administering the medication records in the resident's medical record: a. the date and time the medication was administered; b. the dosage; c. the route of administration; d. the injection site(if applicable); e. any complaints or symptoms for which the drug is administered; F. Any results achieved and when those results were observed; and g. the signature and title of the person administering the drug.Review of Resident R20's clinical record revealed resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis of need for assistance with personal care, rheumatoid arthritis.Review of Resident R20's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations of the physical environment, interviews with staff and reviews of clinical records, hospital records and policies and procedures, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent an unauthorized leave from the nursing unit resulting in a resident elopement from one of five residents reviewed. (Resident Cl1)Findings include:A review of the policy and procedure titled elopement and wandering dated November 2023 revealed that it was the responsibility of the facility staff to identify residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and prevent harm from elopement and wandering. The policy said that the facility staff were responsible for clinically assessing each resident and identifying who was at risk for elopement and wandering. The policy said that for those residents identified at risk for wandering, elopement and other safety issues that strategies and interventions to maintain the safety of the resident would be implemented. The policy indicated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policies and procedures, employee personnel records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an abuse prohibition policy that required a thorough investigation of prospective employees' employment history for three of five newly hired employees reviewed. (Employees E8, E9, E10) Findings include: A review of the Facility Policy titled Abuse Prevention Program revised November 30, 2022, revealed our residents but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal mental and sexual or physical abuse, physical or chemical restrains to required to treat resident's symptoms. Under Policy Implementation bullet #2 it further states Conduct employee background checks and will not knowingly employ or otherwise engage any individual who has been found guilty of abuse, neglect exploitation, misappropriation of property, or exploitations mistreatment of residents or misappropriation of their property. A review of the Activity aide, Employee E8's personnel file revealed that Employee E8…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that allegations of abuse and neglect was reported immediately to the Pennsylvania Department of Health for one of four residents reviewed. (Resident R143) Findings Include: A review of the Facility Policy titled Abuse Prevention Program revised November 30, 2022, revealed our residents but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal mental and sexual or physical abuse, physical or chemical restrains to required to treat resident's symptoms. Under Policy Implementation bullet #2 it further states Conduct employee background checks and will not knowingly employ or otherwise engage any individual who has been found guilty of abuse, neglect exploitation, misappropriation of property, or exploitations mistreatment of residents or misappropriation of their property. Review of Resident R143's clinical record revealed that the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for one of two clinical records reviewed (Resident R140). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, Care Plan, Comprehensive Person-Centered revised March 2022, revealed, A comprehensive, personal -centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Review of Resident 140's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had a diagnosis of severe protein-calorie malnutrition, anorexia (eating disorder that involves severe calorie restriction), depression (loss of interest in pleasurable activities), muscle weakness. On May 13, 2025, at 12:13 p.m. an interview was held with Resident 140 who reported I lost a lot of weight. Review of Resident R140's clinical record revealed no documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for three of twelve residents reviewed (Residents R29, R4 and R188 ). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Care Plan, Comprehensive Person-Centered revised March 2022, revealed, a comprehensive, personal -centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to [NAME] the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident and services not provided due to the resident exercising their right to refuse treatment. A review of the clinical record for Resident R4 revealed an admission date of November 02, 2023, with diagnoses including chronic pulmonary disease (disease process that causes decreased ability of the lungs toperform), respiratory failure with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen). Review of Resident R4's physician orders dated May 11, 2025, for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, review of facility policy and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care and services for two of 12 residents reviewed (Residents R4, R29). Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy and Guidelines for implementation of Oxygen administration indicated that the nurse should review and follow the physician's orders while administering Oxygen via nasal canula. Review of Resident R29's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Parkinson's Disease (Parkinson's disease is a progressive neurological disorder characterized by the degeneration of brain cells that produce dopamine, a neurotransmitter essential for motor control. This leads to a variety of motor symptoms, including tremors, stiffness, slowness of movement, and balance problems. Additionally, non-motor symptoms like depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbances can also occur), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on a review of employee personnel records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete performance reviews for nurse aides in one out of the two employee personnel records reviewed. (Employee E12) Findings include: Record review of personnel file for Employee E12 revealed that employee was hired by the facility on March 23, 2024 as a nurse aide. There was no further documentation available in the record to demonstrate that a skills evaluation or post orientation performance evaluation had been completed. Interview on May 16, 2025 at 10:44 a.m. with the Director of Nursing revealed that the facility does not complete competencies or performance reviews on staff and confirmed that Employee E12 does not have a completed performance review on file. Continued interview with the Director of Nursing revealed that the facility does not have a policy or procedure related to staff competencies or performance reviews and stated that none of the nurse aides have annual performance reviews completed. 28 Pa. Code 201.19 Personnel policies and procedures
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to to ensure that nursing staff was informed of a resident with a diagnosis of PTSD (Post traumatic Stress Disorder) to ensure treatment and services for one of one resident review with PTSD. (Resident R4) Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled, Trauma-Informed Care undated, reveals This policy establishes guidelines for implementing trauma-informed care (TIC) in the long-term care facility to support residents and staff who may have experienced trauma. The goal is to provide care that is safe, respectful, and responsive to the effects of trauma while fostering a supportive environment. Rreview of Resident R4's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Continued review of the resident's clinical record revealed a psychological notes completed by Nurse Practitioner , Employee E7 on March 27, 2025, and May 1, 2025, which documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and interviews with staff, it was determined the facility failed to acquire, receive and administer medications to a newly admitted resident for one of 12 resident records reviewed (Resident 190). Findings include: Review of Resident R190's nursing note revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], at 11:52 a.m. from the hospital, with a diagnosis of traumatic subdural hematoma due to a fall prior to admission. Resident R190 was alert and oriented, capable of making their own decisions. Continued review of nursing notes indicated Writer reviewed and provided a copy of all of physician orders including medication administration and treatment administration records to resident. Resident reviewed and is agreeable with and received a copy of baseline and discharge plan of care. On March 1, 2025 the electronic medication administration record (EMAR) noted Heparin Sodium (Porcine) Injection Solution 5000 UNIT/ML instructed to inject 50000 unit subcutaneously two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of clinical records, and interviews with facility staff, and facility policy it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that it was free of medication error rate of five percent or greater for one of four residents observed during medication administration (Residents R29), and failed to administer medications in a timely manner, and as ordered by the physician for one of 12 resident records reviewed (Resident R188). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications revised on April 2020 states medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. Medication administration times are determined by resident need and benefit not staff convenience. Medications are administered within one hour of prescribed time, if a dosage is believed to be inappropriate or excessive for a resident the person preparing or administering the medication will contact the prescriber. Resident R188 was initially…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not maintain complete and accurate medical records for four of four records reviewed related to catheter care and urinary continence. (Residents R1, R2, R4, and R5). Findings include: Review of clinical documentation revealed that Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses of fracture of right tibia, fracture of left tibia, fracture of left fibula, and morbid obesity. Review of the resident's clinical record revealed that she utilized an indwelling urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder through the urethra in order to assist in emptying it of urine, and which stays in place for an extended period of time). Review of Nurse Aide documentation of bladder function for the time period of September 13, 2024, through September 24, 2024, revealed that available options for documenting the resident's urinary continence included Continent (having sufficient voluntary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews, interviews with staff and review of policies and procedures and review of emergency medications and review of Pennsylvania Professional Nurse Practice Act., it was determined that the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice related to providing routine and emergency pain medication to meet the needs of one of seven residents reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings include: According to the Pennsylvania Code Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards Department of State, Chapter 21 State Board of Nursing, Chapter 21.145 Functions of the LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) requires the following: (a) The LPN is prepared to function as a member of the health care team by exercising sound nursing judgement based on preparations, knowledge, skills, understandings, and past experiences in nursing situations. The LPN participates in the planning, implementation, and evaluation of nursing care in settings where nursing takes place. (b) The LPN administers medication and carries out the therapeutic treatment ordered for the patient in accordance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the review of clinical records and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided consistent with physician orders for one of one resident reviewed for pain management. (Resident R98) Findings include: Interview with Resident R98 on July 10, 2024, at 9:53 a.m. revealed that she was not receiving pain medication as ordered. She stated when she was not receiving pain medication when her pain level was 10 of a scale of 10. It also affected her activities and sleep. She stated did not receive her morphine sulfate pain medication for over 48 hours. Resident stated she has pain to lower back, right leg, and left leg pain radiates down to the foot. Review of physician orders for Resident R98 for July 2024, revealed orders for the following pain medications: Lyrica 150 milligrams (mg) every 12 hour for chronic pain; Morphine sulfate 15 mg every 8 hour for chronic pain; and Oxycodone 10 mg every 6 hour for chronic pain. Review of Medication Administration Record for the month of July 2024 revealed that on July 8, 2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, review of facility's policy and staff interview, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that a drug regimen review was conducted at least monthly and did not ensure the attending physician's reviewed/responded to pharmacist's recommendations for one of five residents reviewed. (Resident R13) Findings include: Review of facility's policy medication regimen reviews, revealed that the consultant pharmacist performs a medication regimen review (MMR) for every resident in the facility receiving medication, and MRR's are done upon admission and at least monthly thereafter, or more frequently if indicated. Reviews for short-stay individuals are done upon admission and as needed to identify individuals with potential medication-related issues and for those who may be experiencing adverse consequences from their medications. Review of Resident R13's clinical records revealed no evidence of medication regimen review completed upon admission since June 8, 2024. Facility unable to provide evidence of MRR completion upon request. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-12 · tag F0836 — patternEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Review of facility documentation, state legislation, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a review of reportable infection to PA-PASR and report as indicated for two of six months reviewed. (May 2024 and June 2024) Findings Include: Review of act 52 of 2007 Medical Care Availability and Reduction of Error (MCARE) act chapter 4. Health care-associated infections 40 p.s. § 1303.401 - 1303.411 (2007) revealed that § 1303.404. Health care facility reporting (a) NURSING HOME REPORTING. - In addition to reporting pursuant to The Health Care Facilities Act, a nursing home shall also electronically report health care-associated infection data to the department and the authority using nationally recognized standards based on CDC definitions, provided that the data is reported on a patient-specific basis in the form, with the time for reporting and format as determined by the department and the authority The Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority developed the Pennsylvania Patient Safety Reporting System, known as PA-PSRS (pronounced PAY-sirs), a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-12 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility documentation, facility policies and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective antibiotic stewardship program that includes a system that includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to effectively monitor antibiotic usage for five of five months of antibiotic stewardship program data reviewed. (February 2024, March 2024, April 2024, May 2024 and June 2024). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Antibiotic Stewardship dated December 2016 , revealed that Antibiotics will be prescribed and administered to residents under the guidance of the facility's antibiotic stewardship program. Further review of facility policy and protocol revealed that the facility policy did not include a system that includes antibiotic use protocols. A review of CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) guidelines, The core element of Antibiotic Stewardship for Nursing Homes, revealed that Improving the use of antibiotics in healthcare to protect patients and reduce the threat of antibiotic resistance is a national…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to offer and/or provide the pneumococcal immunization to five of five residents reviewed (Resident R11, R3, R96, R23 and R20). Findings include: Review of facility policy Pneumococcal vaccine dated October 2019 revealed that Prior to or upon admission, residents will be assessed for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine series, and when indicated, will be offered the vaccine series within thirty (30) days of admission to the facility unless medically contraindicated or the resident has already been vaccinated. Assessments of pneumococcal vaccination status will be conducted within five (5) working days of the resident's admission if not conducted prior to admission. Pneumococcal vaccines will be administered to residents (unless medically contraindicated, already given, or refused) per our facility's physician-approved pneumococcal vaccination protocol. For residents who receive the vaccines, the date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of policy and procedures and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were offered an opportunity to develop an advance directive for one of 13 residents reviewed. (Residents R94). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Advance Directive (revised [DATE]) reviewed in part the following: 1. Upon admission, the resident will be provided with written infom1ation concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to fonnulate an advance directive if he or she chooses to do so. 2. Written infom1ation will include a description of the facility's policies to implement advance directives and applicable state law. 3. If the resident is incapacitated and unable to receive infomrntion about his or her right to formulate an advance directive, the infomrntion may be provided to the resident's legal representative. 4. If the resident becomes able to receive and understand this information later, he or she will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a baseline care plan was developed and implemented, and that a written summary of the baseline care plan was provided to the resident and/or the resident's representative for 7 of 13 residents reviewed (Residents R148, R147, R153, R97 and R94). Findings include: Review of facility policy Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised March 2022, reveals that assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents conditions change. Review of Resident R148's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to facility on June 23, 2024. Review of Wound- weekly observation tool, completed on June 25, 2024 by facility's nurse practitioner, Employee E15, revealed resident was assessed to have suspected deep tissue injury (SDTI) on sacrum, 7 cm in length and 4 cm width, 0.1 cm depth, with treatment plan to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to developed a personal center care plan related to elopment for one of 13 residents reviewed. (Resident R97) Findings include: A review of Resident R97's clinical record revealed that resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis, including altered mental status dementia (progressive degenerative disease of the brain resulting in loss of reality function) and dehydration (lack of sufficient body fluid). Review of care plan for Resident R97 dated July 21, 2024, revealed that the resident had impaired cognitive function/ dementia or impaired thought process. Review of Resident R97's admission assessment revealed an instruction section which indicated Response of Ambulatory and Disoriented/intermittent confusion will score resident at risk for elopement. Review of progress note for Resident R97 dated July 5, 2024, revealed that resident was noted with wandering behavior and exit seeking behavior.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct accurate assessments to ensure that bedrails were used to meet residents' needs and the risks associated with bedrail usage, failed to review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative and obtain informed consent prior to installation for one of two residents (Residents R97). Findings include: A review of Resident R97's clinical record revealed that resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis, including altered mental status dementia and dehydration. Review of care plan for Resident R97 dated July 21, 2024, revealed that the resident had impaired cognitive function/ dementia or impaired thought process. During an observation on 7/10/24, at 11:26 a.m. there were bilateral upper side rails on Resident R97's bed. Review of a side rail/entrapment risk evaluation for Resident R97 dated June 21, 2024 revealed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that laboratory study results were promptly obtained as ordered by the physician for one of 13 clinical records reviewed (Resident R94). Findings include: Interview with Resident R94's daughter on June 9, 2024 at 1:07 p.m. stated resident was more confused and fell 2 days ago. Daughter stated she was concerned that the resident might be anemic, and she requested blood work on Sunday. Daughter stated the blood was collected on Monday morning and still don't have the result. Review of Resident R94's physician progress note dated July 8, 2024 revealed that resident was anemic and monitor H&H (also known as a hemoglobin and hematocrit test, provides information about the blood's oxygen-carrying capacity) Review of physician order dated July 5, 2024 revealed an order to complete blood work CBC (complete blood count), CMP (complete metabolic panel) and Magnesium on July 8, 2024. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse, Employee E18 on June 9, 2024 at 1:25 p.m. stated facility did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observations, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that food was stored and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: Review of undated facility policy titled, Food Storage indicated that Food is stored, prepared and transported at an appropriate temperature and by methods designed to prevent contamination. Freezer temperature: temperature of for freezer should be 0 degrees or below and must be recorded daily An initial tour of the Food Service Department conducted on July 9, 2024, at 9:52 a.m. with Employee E19, Food Service Manager, revealed the following: Observations of the refrigerator inside the kitchen contained hot dogs buns with use by date of June 29, 2024, Inside the refrigerator there was a vegetable tray with no date A tray of cake with no date. A tray of Fresh fruit cup with use by date of July 8, 2024. Lettuce with use by date of July 8, 2024. Observation of the walk-in refrigerator revealed that the door was not completely closed. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that garbage was dispose of properly. Findings include: Observation in the receiving area and the garbage disposal area on July 9, 2024, at 10:30 a.m. with Employee E19, Food Service Manager, revealed one dumpster with the lid open revealing contents. There was brown colored liquid leaking from one dumpster, the leak created a stagnant brown colored liquid outside the dumpster on the floor. There were flies observed around the liquid. A follow up observation with regional dietary staff, Employee E19, on June 10, 2024, at 1:55 p.m. revealed the brown colored liquid was still present next to the dumpster and there were trash from the kitchen on the floor next to the dumpster. 29 Pa. Code 201.18 (b)(1) Management
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, it was determined that the faciltiy failed to ensure that elopment assessments was accurately completed for one of 13 residents reviewed (Resident R97) Findings include: A review of Resident R97's clinical record revealed that resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis, including altered mental status dementia (progressive degenerative disease of the brain resulting in loss of reality function) and dehydration (lack of sufficient body fluid). Review of care plan for Resident R97 dated July 21, 2024, revealed that the resident had impaired cognitive function/ dementia or impaired thought process. Review of Resident R97's admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed an elopement assessment which was not completed accurately. For a question Predisposing Disease it was documented as none present. However, an instruction for predisposing condition included Dementia, Organic Brain Syndrome, Alzheimer's disease, Mental Illness and Traumatic Brain Injury.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policy and interview with staff, it was determined that facility did not ensure to maintain infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for three of 13 residents reviewed. (Resident R148, R147 and Resident R96) Findings include: Review of facility policy Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) , revealed that EBP's are indicated for residents with any of the following: wounds or indwelling medical devices, regardless of : multidrug resistant organisms (MDRO's) colonization status; infection or colonization with an MDRO when contact precautions do not otherwise apply Effective implementation of EBP requires staff training on the proper use of personal protective equipment and the availability of PPE and hand hygiene supplies at the point of care. Review of facility policy Laundry, Bedding, Soiled, dated July 2009 revealed that Place…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0944 — isolatedConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of clinical records, review of facility provided documentation and interview with staff and residents, it was determined that facility did not ensure to include as part of its Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program mandatory training that outlines and informs staff of the elements and goals of the facility's QAPI program for five of five employees reviewed (Employees E6, E7, E8, E9, and E10) Findings include: Review of Employee E7 and Employee E8's nurse aide personnel files revealed no evidence of training related to facility's QAPI program. Review of licensed nurse personnel files of Employee E6, Employee E9 and Employee E10 revealed no evidence of training provided regarding facility's QAPI program. Findings confirmed with facility's administrator on July 12, 2024. 28 Pa Code 201.14(a)Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa Code 201.18(b)(1) Management 28 Pa Code 201.20(a)(c)Staff development
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan that included instructions related to a diagnosis of heart failure for one of two residents reviewed. (Resident R1). Findings include: Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], diagnosed with encephalopathy ( a disease in which the functioning of the brain is affected), chronic kidney disease, unspecified heart failure (heart does not pump sufficiently) and high blood pressure. Physicians note dated December 19, 2023, stated, Elevated legs at rest. Compression stocking (used to improve blood flow from legs to the heart and to decrease swelling (edema) in legs) on in AM off before bed. Vitals daily and weigh weekly. Alert provider of weight gain of more than 2-3 pounds in a 24-hour period or more than 5 pounds in a week (weight gain is a marker for heart failure). Review of Resident R1's care plan failed to develop a plan of care related to Resident R1's diagnosis of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident records and interviews with staff, it was determined the facility did not follow/obtain nor clarify physician orders for medication and treatments for one of two residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], diagnosed with encephalopathy, chronic kidney disease, unspecified heart failure and high blood pressure. Review of Resident R1's December 2023 electronic medication administration record (EMAR) physician orders instructed: Ticagrelor Oral Tablet 90 milligrams (mg) instructed to give one tablet by mouth every 12 hours at 9:00 a.m. and 9 p.m. for Post Carotid Surgery was not given during the 9 p.m. dose on December 17, and 20, 2024. Nursing note specified the medication was not available. Clonidine HCl Oral Tablet 0.3 mg instructed to give 0.3 mg by mouth two times a day for high blood pressure was not given on December 20, 2023. Nursing note specified the medication was not available. To weigh resident on admission and 24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility policy, and review of facility documentation it was determined that the facility did not ensure an effective infection prevention program was maintained related to hand hygiene observed for one of six residents observed. (Resident R6) Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene dated July 2023, reads, Policy Statement: This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections. 1. All personnel shall be trained and regularly in-serviced on the importance of hand hygiene in preventing the transmission of healthcare-associated infections. 2. All personnel shall follow the handwashing/hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of infections to other personnel, residents, and visitors. 3. Hand hygiene products and supplies (sinks, soap, towels, alcohol-based hand rub, etc.) shall be readily accessible and convenient for staff use to encourage compliance with hand hygiene policies. 4. Triclosan-containing soaps will not be used. 5. Wash hands with soap (antimicrobial or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-05-16 · tag F0577 — patternAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of the observations, and an interview with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the most recent Department of Health Survey results were readily accessible to residents and visitors in two of two nursing floors. (First Floor and Second Floor. Findings include: On May 13, 2025, at 11:52 a.m., a facility tour was conducted with the Director of Social Services, Employee E4 to observe the placement of the Department of Health Survey binder within the facility. During the tour of the first and second-floor nursing units, it was noted that the Department of Health Survey results binder was not readily accessible to residents or visitors, as it was placed behind the nursing station, requiring individuals to request access. Additionally, the binder on the second floor was outdated, with the most recent survey results dated January 22, 2019. During a resident council meeting held on March 14, 2025, at 10:30 a.m., with 4 residents (R27, R9, R140, R14), who were identified as alert and oriented, it was revealed that the residents were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$36,186 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $36,186 — penalty dated 2024-07-12
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LME FAMILY HOLDINGS — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 2.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TWINING VILLAGE OPERATING HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 08/03/2020 |
| BE SMARTS TR | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/03/2020 |
| EL TWINING LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/03/2020 |
| LAHASKY FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/03/2020 |
| TWINING MANAGING MEMBER LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/03/2020 |
| TWINING MEMBER LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/03/2020 |
| KASORO, TAI | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 08/03/2020 |
| BRAUNSTEIN, BARRY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 08/03/2020 |
| FEUER, SAMUEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 08/03/2020 |
| LAHASKY, EPHRAM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 08/03/2020 |
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page for homes that do.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395432. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.