Valley Manor Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 83 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 40.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 66 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 154.7 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.84 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, review of facility documentation, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary supervision to monitor a resident's whereabouts and prevent an elopement (unauthorized departure from the facility) by one of 16 sampled residents at risk for elopement. (Resident 1) This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation. The incident has been identified as past non-compliance. Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Elopement, last reviewed on September 28, 2023, revealed that staff was to monitor residents' whereabouts who were at risk for unsafe wandering and elopement. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included dementia (impaired cognition, or a disease that causes progressive cognitive impairment that includes memory loss and personality changes), depressed mood, anxiety, and difficulty walking. According to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable environment on three of six nursing units (300, 400, 500). In addition, the facility failed to maintain the rear exterior of the building in a safe condition for resident use. Findings include: Observation on May 19, 2026, from 12:20 p.m. to 1:50 p.m., revealed the following: In room [ROOM NUMBER], the walls were heavily marred with chipped paint. There were three holes on the wall behind bed A. In the toilet room of the 400-unit bathing suite, there was a towel that had a brown substance that was placed on top of a toilet plunger. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the flooring throughout the room was stained with a dark, black residue. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the bottom of the wall near the shared bathroom was cracked. The built-in dresser had cracks along the side. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the paper towel dispenser for the shared sink was broken. The rear exterior of the facility had holes and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain resident environment and equipment in a sanitary and homelike manner on four of six nursing units. (Nursing unit 200, 400, 500, and 600) Findings include: Observation on February 24, 2026, from 10:05 a.m. to 2:20 p.m., and February 25, 2026, from 9:15 a.m. to 12:15 p.m., revealed the following: There was a block of floor tiles missing at the entrance to the main kitchen. The refrigerator in the nourishment room behind the nursing station of the central 200 nursing unit revealed that the shelves in the refrigerator were splattered with juice stains. In resident room [ROOM NUMBER], the over the toilet handrails in the bathroom were very loose and not sturdy. The shared bathroom between room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER] had black spots on the floor. The privacy curtain between beds in room [ROOM NUMBER] had a large stain. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the screws holding the window curtain rod in the wall were coming out and the curtain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide treatment and services as ordered by the physician to promote healing and prevent new pressure sores for two of three sampled residents who had pressure sores. (Resident 4, 10) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 4 had diagnoses that included early onset of Alzheimer's disease. A review of a skin assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident had a pressure sore on her right buttock and a scar on her coccyx. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident required substantial assistance with overall care and that she had two pressure sores. A review of the care plan revealed that the resident had an actual wound on her right buttock and sacral slit. There was an intervention for staff to provide treatments as ordered by the physician. Review of a physician's order dated February 19, 2026, directed staff cleanse the sacral slit with soap and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physicians' orders were implemented for five of 33 sampled residents. (Residents 1, 66, 78, 86, and 118) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included hypotension (low blood pressure). A physician's order dated March 11, 2024, directed staff to administer a medication (midodrine) three times a day for hypotension. Staff were not to administer the medication if the resident's systolic blood pressure (SBP, the first measurement of blood pressure when the heart beats and the pressure is at its highest) was greater than 120 millimeters of mercury (mm/Hg). Review of Resident 1's January 2026 and February 2026 medication administration records (MARs) revealed that staff administered the medication 19 times in January and 10 times in February when the resident's SBP was greater than 120 mm/Hg. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 66 had diagnoses that included seizure disorder and traumatic subdural hemorrhage (a collection of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assess residents with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and develop and implement an individualized person-centered care plan to render trauma informed care for three of five sampled residents diagnosed with PTSD. (Residents 4,16 and 77) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), schizoaffective disorder and early onset of Alzheimer's disease. The Minimum Data (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident had some memory impairment and had a diagnosis of PTSD. There was no documentation to support that the resident was assessed for symptoms or triggers related to the diagnosis of PTSD. The care plan for Resident 4 did not include any measures to address the resident's history of trauma or identify triggers. There were no specific interventions to meet the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accurate reconciliation records for controlled substances on one of seven medication carts. (400 Unit medication cart)Findings include:Review of the facility policy entitled, Controlled Medication Storage, last reviewed January 22, 2026, revealed that at shift change, a physical inventory of all controlled medications was to be conducted by two licensed nurses and documented on the individual resident's controlled medication accountability record. In an interview on February 26, 2026, at 1:30 p.m., the Director of Nursing stated that the nurse coming on duty and nurse going off duty were to count all controlled substances and other medications with the risk of abuse or diversion at the change of each shift and document on a Shift Count sheet that the count on the resident accountability card was accurate. The nurse coming on duty was responsible for the cart. This shift-to-shift count was to be completed at the same time by both nurses. Following shift to shift…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review it was determined that the facility failed to develop and/or implement a comprehensive care plan that addressed individual resident needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment for one of three sampled residents. (Resident 1) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation (an irregular heart rhythm) and an infection in the skin. According to the Minimum Data Set assessment, dated April 18, 2025, the resident was dependent on staff for care, had multiple wounds, and had heart disease. On April 21, 2025, a nurse practioner noted that the resident has prior surgeries including the placement of an internal cardioverter/defibrillator (a device that administers a shock to correct certain abnormal rhythms). There was no documentation that the facility included interventions on the plan of care to monitor and care for this device. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were implemented for one of eight sampled residents. (Resident 1) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included dementia, diabetes, and end stage renal disease (kidney failure). Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed that Resident 1 was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance from staff for dressing. On April 30, 2025, the physician ordered for staff to apply geri sleeves (arm protectors) to both arms at all times except during hygiene. Multiple observations on May 15, 2025, between 10:00 a.m., and 12:40 p.m., revealed that Resident 1 was in bed without geri sleeves on his arms. CFR 483.25 Quality of Care Previously cited 3/6/25 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement safety interventions for two of eight sampled residents. (Residents 1 and 2) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included dementia, diabetes, and end stage renal disease (kidney failure). The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident 1 was cognitively impaired and required staff assistance for bed mobility and transfers. Review of the care plan revealed that the resident was at risk for falls and staff was to place mats on the floor on both sides of the bed while the resident was in bed. Review of facility documentation dated March 3, 2025, and April 5, 2025, revealed that the resident slid out of bed onto the floor. On March 9, 2025, documentation revealed that the resident was found on the floor at the foot of the bed. On April 2, 2025, documentation revealed that the resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to document the rationale for the continued use of as needed (PRN) anti-anxiety medications for three of five sampled residents who were on psychotropic medications. (Residents 47, 106, 128) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 47 had diagnoses that included anxiety, major depressive disorder and end stage renal disease. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident had minimal memory impairment, and had been administered an anti-anxiety medication within the seven-day assessment period. A review of the care plan revealed that the resident utilized psychotropic medications due to anxiety. On January 13, 2025, a physician ordered for staff to administer an anti-anxiety medication (Ativan) every 12 hours PRN for anxiety. Review of the Medication Administration Records (MARs) revealed that Resident 47 received the prn Ativan four times in January 2025, twice in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,021 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,021 — penalty dated 2024-08-28

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LME FAMILY HOLDINGS — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 91% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA