Bethany Woods Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 72 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 67.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 112.0 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 68 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.78 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-04-02 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews, and interviews with the police detective, pharmacy consultant, physician and staff, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from misappropriation of multiple non-narcotic medications when Nurse #1 was found with a bag of prescribed medications during a traffic stop. This deficient practice affected 16 of 16 residents reviewed for misappropriation (Residents #2, #10, #31, #37, #60, #68, #78, #86, #88, #121, #122, #123, #124, #125, #126, and #127).The findings included: A review of the facility's policy entitled Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation and Exploitation dated August 2019 read in part . The resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation.Misappropriation of resident property is defined as the deliberate misplacement, exploitation or wrongful, temporary, or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without consent. A review of sheriff's office incident sheet dated 9/4/25 read that on 9/4/25 at 3:08 PM, a traffic stop was conducted with Nurse #1 due to a vehicle…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to secure medications left on top of and in an unattended unlocked medication cart (400 hall medication cart) and failed to remove one (1) bottle of expired eye drops, label an Ozempic insulin pen with the name of the specific resident for whom it was prescribed and the date it was opened, and stored an unopened insulin pen in the medication cart (800 hall medication cart). This was for 2 of 3 medication carts observed for medication storage (400 hall and 800 hall medication cart). The findings included: 1. A continuous observation of an unattended medication cart on the 400 hall was made on 4/2/26 from 12:35 PM until 12:38 PM. The medication cart was observed to be unlocked (a red dot is visible on the lock mechanism when in the unlocked position), the narcotic medication drawer was pulled out and open, allowing the medications in the narcotic drawer to be exposed. In addition, a cup of crushed white pills and a small white bottle of medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents were treated in a dignified and respectful manner. This was evidenced by staff arguing with a resident and using profanity in the resident's presence for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for dignity (Resident #7).Findings included:Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified mood affective disorder and anxiety disorder.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed that Resident #7 was cognitively intact.Resident #7's active care plan, last reviewed on 3/2/26, indicated that he exhibits problematic behaviors related to ineffective coping, including verbal aggression and expressions of anger. These behaviors include use of profanity towards others, making threats toward staff, and making false accusations regarding his care. Interventions included avoid arguments with the resident.A review of the investigation report dated 3/23/26, completed by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light system was placed within reach and accessible for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs (Resident #7).The findings included:Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including quadriplegia, diabetes mellitus, stage 3 chronic kidney disease.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed Resident #7 was cognitively intact, had impaired function in both upper and lower extremities, and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADL).Review of the active care plan, last reviewed 3/2/26, identified the resident required staff assistance for all ADL due to quadriplegia and utilized a mouth blowing call system device to summon assistance. The care plan also indicated the resident exhibited problematic manner behaviors, including calling 911 when not receiving timely attention. Interventions included responding promptly to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide personal privacy during incontinence care when Nurse Aide (NA) #1 captured a picture of Resident #42 with her cellphone while in the room during care. Resident #42 was partially clothed and uncovered in the photo. This deficient practice affected 1 of 1 resident reviewed for privacy (Resident # 42).The findings included:Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes type II, congestive heart failure, and peripheral vascular disease with a right below the knee amputation (BKA). The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #42 was cognitively intact, frequently incontinent, and dependent on assistance for activities of daily living (ADL).The Director of Nursing (DON) interview was conducted on 04/02/26 at 9:11 AM. The DON stated they received a call from an anonymous caller on 1/16/26 stating he had a screenshot of a resident from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and resident, staff, and Medical Director interviews, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was delivered at the prescribed rate. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #11).Findings included:Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic respiratory failure and COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease).The care plan dated 12/31/25 revealed Resident #11 had an intervention for oxygen therapy as ordered related to COPD.A review of the electronic medical record for Resident #11 revealed a physician order dated 1/22/26 for oxygen therapy at 3 liters per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula continuously to keep oxygen saturation levels above 90%.The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #11 was cognitively intact and was receiving oxygen therapy.An observation of Resident #11 was conducted on 3/30/26 at 2:20 PM. It was noted the oxygen concentrator…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to have a medication error rate of less than 5% as evidenced by 2 medication errors out of 27 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 7.41% for 2 of 3 residents observed for medication administration (Resident #129 and Resident #110).The findings includeda. Resident #129 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of atrial fibrillation and cardiomyopathy.A review of Resident #129's active physician's orders included a current order for March 2026 of metoprolol succinate 25 milligrams (mg) by mouth once daily. Hold for systolic blood pressure less than 110 or heart rate less than 60.On 4/1/26 at 9:00 AM Nurse #3 was observed as she obtained Resident #129's blood pressure and heart rate. Resident #129's blood pressure was noted as 110/64 and heart rate was 79. Nurse #3 stated she was going to hold Resident #129's metoprolol succinate since her systolic (top number) blood pressure was so close to the hold…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations and interviews with residents and staff, the facility failed to provide routine hair trimming. This was for 4 of 6 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) (Residents #36, # 50, #53, and #77). The findings included: 1. Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #36 was cognitively intact. During an interview and observation with Resident #36 on 12/18/24 at 10:00 AM, he expressed that he would like to have his hair cut as it was longer than he liked to wear it. He explained he had not been able to get his hair cut in four months since the facility no longer had anyone available to provide this service. Resident #36 was unable to recall the staff that he talked to about getting his hair cut. Resident #36's hair was long on the sides and was long around the ears. On 12/18/24 at 10:41 AM, the Social Services Director was interviewed and stated that she was not aware that Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, and Nurse Practitioner, Medical Director, family member, and staff interviews, the facility failed to prevent significant medication errors when Nurse #1 administered medications to Resident #23 prescribed for Resident #240 which included Eliquis (used to prevent blood from clotting), buspirone (used to treat anxiety disorders), gabapentin (used to treat epilepsy), isosorbide (used to treat high blood pressure), metoprolol (used to treat high blood pressure), spironolactone (used to treat high blood pressure), citalopram (used to treat depression). In addtion Resident #4 was administered medications prescribed to Resident #191 which included Aricept (used to treat dementia), Lexapro (used to treat depression) and Tramadol (used to treat pain). This deficient practice affected 2 of 8 residents whose medications were reviewed (Residents #23 and #4). The findings included: 1. Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the physician orders dated July 2024, scheduled for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, and Nurse Practitioner (NP), Medical Director, family member, and staff interviews, the facility failed to prevent medication errors when Nurse #1 administered medications to Resident #23 prescribed for Resident #240 which included fish oil (used to promote health by reducing triglycerides) and famotidine (decreases stomach acid and used to treat heart burn and gastroesophageal reflux disease). The facility also failed to prevent medication errors when medications were not administered as ordered by the physician (Resident #55). This deficient practice affected 2 of 8 residents whose medications were reviewed (Residents #23 and #55). The findings included: 1. Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #240 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the physician orders dated July 2024, scheduled for 9:00 AM, revealed Resident #240 had orders for: - Famotidine 20 milligrams (mg) by mouth one time a day related to gastroesophageal reflux disease. -Fish Oil…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRINCIPLE LONG TERM CARE — 40 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC