No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Smoky Mountain Health and Rehabilitation Center

1349 Crabtree Road, Waynesville, NC 28785 · For profit - Corporation · 50 certified beds · (828) 454-9260 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (828) 454-9260 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited Mar 2026
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • nursing-staff turnover (61%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 24% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
360 Hospital Dr Ste 102 · (828) 456-9006 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Grocery
Food Lion1.0 mi
179 Paragon Pkwy · (828) 456-4661 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1630 County Rd · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased28.6%15.6%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.7%7.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.9%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.3%5.9%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.7%3.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened30.3%18.3%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication30.8%21.3%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.0%5.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.1%20.7%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.9%14.0%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.7%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.7%78.1%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.3%22.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.7%12.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.421.781.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.991.801.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 93 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
69.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.66U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.26hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.24hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 69.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 66 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.66 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.6%CMS range 37.9–56.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 7.2–14.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge69.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge69.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge72.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay5.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.3%CMS range 4.8–12.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.211.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.04
RN hours/ resident / day
0.68
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.21
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.93
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.60
RN hoursweekends
60.8%
Total nursing turnover
61.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 40.1 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.93 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.04 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.04 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.21 to 0.60 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-19)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-05)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

10 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to dispose of food stored past the use by date in 1 of 1 dry food storage area, failed to keep beverages off the floor and failed to clean 1 of 1 walk-in refrigerator for food storage. The deficient practice had the potential to affect food served to residents.Findings Included a. On 3/16/26 at 10:40 AM, an observation of the walk-in refrigerator was conducted with the Dietary Manager. The floor under the food storage racks contained a buildup of grey white debris that crumbled when touched. Several areas of the floor were raised, white, and fuzzy in appearance. The food storage racks also had a thick, grey, sticky substance on the metal shelving.During the observation, the Dietary Manager stated that the food storage racks were last cleaned in January of the current year. She reported that the walk-in refrigerator floor was scheduled to be replaced and, for that reason, had not been cleaned. She did not know when the replacement would occur but stated she would clean the floor.b. At 10:48 AM on 3/16/26, the dry food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews with resident, staff and the Medical Director, the facility failed to ensure an as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication, Clonazepam (a medication primarily used for panic disorder), had a stop date of 14 days for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #44).Findings included:Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder.The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #44 was cognitively intact and that she received antianxiety medications during the assessment period.Resident #44's care plan last reviewed on 2/11/26 indicated the use of psychotropic medications with the potential for adverse effects. The goal was to show improvement in mood/decreased behaviors with minimal side effects of the medications taken through next review. Interventions included administering medications per physician's orders.A review of the physician's orders in Resident #44's medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with residents, Responsible Party and staff the facility failed to explain the arbitration agreement document in a manner understood by residents and their Responsible Parties. This was for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for arbitration agreement (Resident #1, Resident #3, Resident #4).Findings includedThe facility's arbitration agreement was reviewed. The arbitration agreement wrote Agreement is not a precondition to admission or the furnishing of services to the resident by the Facility, and (3) this agreement may be rescinded by written notice to the facility within thirty (30) days of signature. If not rescinded within thirty (30) days, this agreement shall remain in effect for all care and services subsequently rendered at the facility, even if such care and services are rendered following the resident's discharge and readmission to the facility. The document included a signature line below verbiage for the resident or responsible party with no further indication of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete the Care Area Assessment (CAA) comprehensively to address the underlying causes and contributing factors of the triggered areas for 2 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents #10 and Resident #11). The findings included: a. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety disorder, and osteoarthritis. A review of Section V (CAA Summary) of the significant change in status MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed 10 care areas were triggered for Resident #10. The MDS Coordinator did not provide any information in the analysis of findings for 9 of the 10 triggered areas to describe the nature of Resident 10's problems, possible causes, contributing factors, risk factors related to the care area, and reasons to proceed with care planning for the following triggered care areas: 1. Delirium 2. Cognitive loss/dementia 3. Visual functions 4. Communication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) application was completed for a resident who had a new psychiatric diagnosis for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #10) reviewed for PASRR. The findings included: Resident #10 was admitted to the facility 9/2/23 with diagnoses that included polyosteoarthritis, and generalized anxiety disorder. Resident #10's care plan initiated on 4/8/24 indicated Resident #10 had actual acute confusional state characterized by behaviors, altered thought process, delusions and hallucinations related to legal blindness and hearing deficit. A review of Resident #10's medical record indicated hallucinations was added to her diagnoses list effective 8/1/24. There was no information in Resident #10's medical record regarding the PASRR number or if a new application for PASRR was completed by facility staff after Resident #10 was diagnosed with hallucinations. The most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to post cautionary and safety signage outside a resident's room that indicated the use of oxygen for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #239). The findings included: Resident #239 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition in which there is an inadequate supply of oxygen to the body's tissues). A review of Resident #239's physician orders revealed an order dated 01/17/25 for oxygen to be administered continuously via nasal cannula at 2 liters per minute, may titrate to keep oxygen (O2) saturation greater than 90%. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #239 was cognitively intact and coded for oxygen use. An observation on 02/02/25 at 11:54 AM revealed Resident #239 sitting in his wheelchair by his bed with oxygen being administered by an oxygen concentrator. He was holding the nasal cannula in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to remove expired medication in accordance with manufacturer's expiration date and failed to date a time sensitive eye drops after it was opened and stored at room temperature for 1 or 2 medications carts observed during medication storage checks (Medication Cart #1). The findings included: Review of the manufacturer's package insert for Latanoprost eye drops revealed an unopened bottle should be stored under refrigeration between 36° to 46° Fahrenheit (F) and protected from light. Once opened, Latanoprost may be stored at room temperature up to 77° F for up to six weeks. An observation was conducted on 02/03/25 at 3:49 PM for Medication Cart #1 in the presence of Nurse #2. The observation revealed the following: - One opened bottle of Latanoprost 0.005% eye drop (medication used to treat glaucoma) for Resident #14 was stored at room temperature without an opening date and ready to be used. A sticker for the nurse to record the opening date remained blank. - One opened bottle of docusate sodium liquid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-28 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a lunch meal tray line observation, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to serve cod in a three-ounce portion per the menu. This failure had the potential to affect 15 residents with orders for mechanical soft diet texture. Findings included: The menu for the lunch meal on 09/26/23 for residents receiving a mechanical soft diet was 3 ounces of baked cod, a half cup of au gratin potatoes, a half cup of green peas, and a dinner roll. A continuous observation of the lunch meal tray line on 09/26/23 from 12:00 PM through 12:15 PM revealed [NAME] #1 began plating food and used a number 16 scoop (contained 2-2.25 ounces) to plate cod for residents receiving a mechanical soft diet. [NAME] #1 was observed giving a level scoop of cod using the number 16 scoop. During the observation [NAME] #1 dropped the number 16 scoop into an open area on the steam table and retrieved a number 8 scoop (contained 4-5 ounces) from a drawer close to the steam table and continued plating the cod for residents receiving a mechanical soft diet texture. [NAME] #1 did not use a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to maintain a resident's privacy by checking her fingerstick blood glucose in the dining room in the presence of other residents and a visitor for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #17). The reasonable person concept was applied to this deficiency and a reasonable person would expect privacy when their fingerstick blood sugar was checked. Findings included: Resident #17 was admitted to the facility 03/06/18 with diagnoses including diabetes and non-Alzheimer's dementia. Review of Resident #17's Physician orders revealed an order dated 07/06/23 to check her blood sugar three times a day and as needed. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #17 was severely cognitively impaired. An observation of Resident #17 on 09/26/23 at 12:26 PM revealed she was sitting in the dining room eating lunch. Three other residents were observed sitting at the table with Resident #17 and were also eating lunch. Nurse #1 approached…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews with staff, the facility failed to ensure personal and oral hygiene was provided for a resident dependent on staff to trim and clean visibly dirty fingernails and brush and clean visibly dirty dentures for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (Resident #35). Findings included: Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and cerebrovascular accident (stroke). The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #35 cognition was significantly impaired and extensive assistance was needed for personal hygiene. The MDS assessment did not identify Resident #35 had rejection of care behaviors during the lookback period. Resident #35's care plan for activities of daily living (ADL) and personal care revised on 09/25/23 read in part, Care would be completed with staff support as appropriate to maintain or achieve the highest practical level of functioning.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRINCIPLE LONG TERM CARE — 40 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
Health inspection 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.0+1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 39 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Ayden Court Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterAyden, NC 1 of 5Greendale Forest Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterSnow Hill, NC 1 of 5River Trace Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterWashington, NC 1 of 5Somerwoods Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSomerset, KY 1 of 5University Place Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterCharlotte, NC 2 of 5Cherry Point Bay Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterHavelock, NC 2 of 5Clear Creek Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterMint Hill, NC 2 of 5Graham Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterRobbinsville, NC 2 of 5Greenwood Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterBowling Green, KY 2 of 5Macon Valley Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterFranklin, NC 2 of 5Magnolia Lane Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterMorganton, NC 2 of 5Northchase Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterWilmington, NC 2 of 5Tower Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterRaleigh, NC 2 of 5Westwood Hills Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterWilkesboro, NC 2 of 5Willow Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterGoldsboro, NC 3 of 5Bethany Woods Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterAlbemarle, NC 3 of 5Franklin Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterLouisburg, NC 3 of 5Greenhaven Health and Rehabilitation CenterGreensboro, NC 3 of 5Harmony Hall Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterKinston, NC 3 of 5Pine Ridge Health and Rehabilitation CenterThomasville, NC 3 of 5Piney Grove Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterKernersville, NC 3 of 5Premier Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterJacksonville, NC 3 of 5Richmond Pines Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenteHamlet, NC 3 of 5Riverpoint Crest Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterNew Bern, NC 3 of 5Springbrook Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterClayton, NC 4 of 5Barbour Court Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterSmithfield, NC 4 of 5Carolina Rivers Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterJacksonville, NC 4 of 5Chowan River Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterEdenton, NC 4 of 5Croatan Ridge Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterNewport, NC 4 of 5Kerr Lake Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterHenderson, NC 4 of 5Lake Park Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterIndian Trail, NC 4 of 5Lake Way Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterBenton, KY 4 of 5Northampton Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterJackson, NC 4 of 5Wayland Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterKeysville, VA 4 of 5Wilson Pines Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterWilson, NC 5 of 5Grantsbrook Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterGrantsboro, NC 5 of 5Harnett Woods Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterDunn, NC 5 of 5Jacob's Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterMadison, NC 5 of 5Maple Grove Health and Rehabilitation CenterGreensboro, NC

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
HILL, ROBERTIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2011
DETAR, DEWEYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/05/2023
WALTERS, SHAYNAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/13/2025
BOICE, GALEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/05/2018
JOHNSON, DIANNEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2011
PRINCIPLE LONG TERM CARE, INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2011
HILL, RAYMONDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2011
HILL, STEPHENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2011

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+7.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.1M
Related-party expense24% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 50%Medicare 20%Other / private 30%

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$349per resident / day
operating cost
$10,622per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$378per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the North Carolina Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in North Carolina
$9,733/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,798/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,496/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 345396. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next