Magnolia Lane Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 54.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 41% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 121 beds and averages 69.0 residents a day — about 57% occupied, or roughly 52 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.31 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.42 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-08-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff, resident, and Medical Director interviews the facility failed to assist a resident with a transfer from the wheelchair to bed when Nurse Aide (NA) #1 stood behind Resident #4 and allowed the resident to transfer independently. Resident #4's leg slipped, the resident fell onto the bed and experienced shoulder pain. Resident #4 sustained a left humeral head fracture of the shoulder as was noted on the CT (computed tomography) scan on 7/20/2023. This was for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for supervision to prevent accidents. The findings included: Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), primary osteoarthritis of the left shoulder, stroke, atrial fibrillation, and left hemiplegia. Review of the physician orders for Resident #4 included Apixaban (blood thinner) 5mg (milligrams) by mouth twice a day for Atrial Fibrillation. Ordered 6/19/2023. A review of the physical therapy evaluation conducted on 6/21/2023…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-19 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to communicate the facility's efforts to address concerns and document in writing the facility's response and rationale to concerns voiced during Resident Council meetings for 5 of 10 Resident Council meetings reviewed (January 2025, March 2025, June 2025, July 2025, and August 2025).Findings included:The Resident Council minutes for December 2024 (no day listed) noted that residents voiced a concern regarding the daily menus were not being posted again. The Resident Council minutes for January 2025 (no day listed) revealed residents voiced they had noticed the daily menus were being posted but they would like more variety. There was no further details documented of the facility's response, actions and rationale taken to address of the facility concern.The Resident Council minutes for February 2025 (no day listed) revealed no documentation of the facility's response, actions and rationale taken to address the food concerns voiced during the previous meeting or if the concern was still ongoing.The Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-19 · tag F0645 — pattern
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to submit a request for an evaluation for a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) determination for residents who were admitted to the facility with serious mental health disorders for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for PASRR (Resident #37, Resident #7, Resident #52 and Resident #50).Findings included: 1. A PASRR Determination Notification letter dated 07/15/25 revealed Resident #37 had a Level I PASRR with no expiration date. Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and bipolar disorder. A staff progress note dated 10/01/25 at 1:44 PM written by the Social Worker (SW) revealed a baseline care plan meeting was held with Resident #37. The SW noted Resident #37 shared a history of significant trauma, including experiences related to war, and had diagnoses of PTSD and bipolar disorder. A physician's progress note dated 10/03/25 revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to discard food past its use-by date in 1 of 1 walk-in cooler and store food off the floor in 1 of 1 walk-in freezer. These practices had the potential to affect food served to residents. The findings included:a. During an initial observation of the facility's kitchen with the Dietary Manager on 12/15/25 at 9:59 AM, the walk-in cooler had two (2) one-quart sized containers of lemon-flavored thickener with a use-by date of 10/28/25.b. During an initial observation of the facility's kitchen with the Dietary Manager on 12/15/25 at 10:12 AM the walk-in freezer was noted to have the following concerns:-Three (3) boxes of frozen turkeys, four turkeys per box, placed on the floor in the center of the walk-in freezer.-One (1) box of french toast sticks placed on the floor in the center of the walk-in freezer.An interview with the Dietary Manager on 12/16/25 3:14PM revealed that food items should not be available to be served to residents past the use-by date and the turkeys and french toast sticks were not stored correctly in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) form was signed by the physician and part of the medical record after the physician ordered for the resident to be Do Not Resuscitate for 1 of 21 residents reviewed for advanced directives (Resident #2). The findings included:Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the physician's signed orders dated [DATE] revealed admission to Hospice with diagnosis of malignant neoplasm (a cancerous tumor) of the gallbladder. Review of the physician's signed orders dated [DATE] revealed an order for Resident #2 to be a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR).An interview with the former Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) who entered the DNR order was attempted but unsuccessful. Review of Resident #2's electronic medical record revealed no evidence a DNR form was completed and signed by the physician.An attempt to contact Resident #2's Responsible Party (RP) was made but unsuccessful.Review of the quarterly Minimum…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN, a form used by skilled nursing facilities to inform residents about potential costs and coverage limitations for services that may not be covered by Medicare) to beneficiaries who intended to continue services and the SNF believed the services may not be covered under Medicare prior to discharge from Medicare Part A skilled services for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for beneficiary notification review (Residents #6, #16, and #76).Findings included:1. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].A Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) revealed the notice was discussed with and signed by Resident #6 on 09/19/25 which indicated his Medicare Part A coverage for skilled services would end on 09/23/25. Resident #6 remained in the facility. Resident #6's medical record revealed no evidence a SNF ABN was reviewed with or provided to Resident #6. During an interview on 12/16/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0659 — isolated
  Provide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a qualified staff member with the necessary skills and licensure inserted a peripheral intravenous (IV) catheter when a Medication Aide used the needle from an IV catheter kit and inserted it into a resident's arm (Resident #78). The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 nursing staff reviewed for sufficient and competent nurse staffing (Medication Aide #1). Findings included: Resident #78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included arthritis, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and diabetes mellitus. Resident #78 was discharged from the facility on 11/16/25. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #78 was severely impaired cognitively, was dependent or required substantial to maximum assistance with activities of daily living, and had taken antianxiety, antibiotic, antiplatelet medications during the lookback period of the assessment.Review of Resident #78's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain oral hygiene for a dependent resident unable to brush their teeth for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (Resident #31). The findings included: Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including autoimmune disease affecting the central nervous system, paralysis or severe weakness affecting the ability to move, and visual impairment. A review of the dental visit note dated 10/13/25 revealed Resident #31's periodontal health was documented as red tissue with a heavy buildup, plaque and calculus as heavy and oral hygiene as poor. The recommendations were for routine oral hygiene and follow up as needed.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 was severely impaired cognitively, had upper extremity range of motion impairment on both sides, and was dependent on staff for oral hygiene. The care plan revised on 10/23/25 revealed Resident #31…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews with the Pharmacy Operation Manager and staff, the facility failed to have effective systems in place for the return of controlled medications to the pharmacy for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #15, Resident #25 and Resident #79).The findings included:a. The physician's order dated 03/19/25 revealed Resident #15 was to receive hydrocodone-acetaminophen (a combination of a narcotic opioid analgesic and a non-narcotic medication to relieve pain) 5-325 milligrams (mg) every 4 hours as needed (PRN) for left leg pain.The controlled substance count record dated 03/20/25 revealed Resident #15 had 30 tablets of hydrocodone-acetaminophen 5-325 mg with the RX# (prescription number) 17427852. Starting on 03/20/25, nurses signed the form indicating the medication was removed and administered to Resident #15 as follows: one dose on 3/20/25, one dose on 3/21/25, one dose on 3/24/25, one dose on 3/26/25, one dose on 3/31/25, one dose on 4/1/25, one dose on 4/8/25, one dose on 4/11/25, one dose on 4/12/25, one dose on 4/13/25, two doses on 4/14/25, one dose on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
  Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews with the Registered Dietitian (RD) and staff, the facility failed to follow the physician's diet order for double portions at breakfast and the enriched meal program for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #52). Findings included: Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including adult failure to thrive and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #52 was severely impaired cognitively, required partial to moderate assistance with eating, had no swallowing disorders, weighed 101 pounds with no documented weight changes, and had a stage two (partial-thickness loss of skin with exposed dermis) pressure ulcer that was present on admission. Review of the RD progress note dated 10/27/25 included recommendations Resident #52 participated in the enriched meal program and received double portions at breakfast. Review of the physician's orders revealed a diet…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement their infection control policy and procedures for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) when Nurse #2 did not put on a protective gown prior to a high contact care activity that involved administering a nutritional supplement and water flushes through a resident's (Resident #45) feeding tube (a medical device inserted into the stomach). This occurred for 1 of 5 staff members reviewed for infection control practices (Nurse #2). Findings included: The facility's Infection Control Policy and Procedures guideline for initiation of precautions last revised on 6/13/24 read in part, isolation precautions for EBP was utilized by staff for residents who had an implanted medical device when providing care and precautions included to wear a gown. A continuous observation on 12/15/25 at 12:04 PM through 12:27 PM revealed an EBP sign was posted on the door of Resident #45's room with instructions staff must wear a gown for high contact resident care activities. High contact care activities listed included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRINCIPLE LONG TERM CARE — 40 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC