Maple Grove Health and Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 210 beds and averages 111.9 residents a day — about 53% occupied, or roughly 98 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.61 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.83 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.33 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.76 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.93 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-03-06 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews with the resident and staff, the facility failed to provide a cognitively dependent resident with access to a hearing amplifier to accommodate a hearing deficit. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for accommodation of needs (Resident #96). The reasonable person concept was applied for Resident #96 due to his inability to hear what was happening around him. A reasonable person would feel social isolation, loneliness, and frustration. Findings included: Resident #96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. A review of the most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #96 had moderately impaired cognition and moderately impaired hearing with the use of a hearing device. Resident #96's care plan revised on 12/14/23 revealed a focus area for inability to express emotion, listen and share information; auditory alteration/deficit characterized by decreased lack of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews with the resident's Responsible Party, staff, Nurse Practitioner (NP), Medical Director, law enforcement, and the hospital physician, the facility failed to protect Resident #1's right to be free from injury of an unknown origin. Resident # 1 sustained facial swelling, hematoma and contusion extending from the right eye to the corner of his right lip. The source of the injury to Resident #1 was not observed by anyone, the source of injury could not be explained by the resident, and the injury was suspicious. On 10/09/25, Resident #1's was observed by Nurse Aide (NA) #2 to have swelling to the residents' right side of face. The resident was transferred to the hospital via Emergency Medical Services (EMS) who noted the resident had been assaulted by a facility staff member. Observations of Resident #1 during the investigation showed swelling to the residents' right side of the face and soreness was reported by the resident. This deficient practice affected 1 of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and Responsible Party, dental provider Chief Operating Officer, Medical Director, staff and hospital physician interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary assistance to obtain dental services for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for routine and emergency dental services (Resident #1). The findings included:Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included seizures, osteoarthritis, and cognitive communication deficit.Review of physician order dated 10/31/23 revealed Resident #1 was ordered Eliquis (anticoagulant medication) 5mg (milligrams) twice a day.Review of the in-house dental list provided by the facility revealed 07/09/25 was the last time the dentist was in the facility. Resident #1 was not seen by the dentist on 07/09/25. Review of a notice sent by the in-house dentist office on 08/22/25 revealed the notice had been emailed to Social Worker (SW) #1 and SW #2 and indicated Resident #1 required a medical consultation for medication adjustment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-06 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interviews the facility failed to complete a significant change in status assessment for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for significant change (Resident #70). Findings included: Resident #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #70 required supervision with eating, upper body dressing, lower body dressing partial /moderate staff assistance for oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, putting on/taking off footwear, and personal hygiene. Resident #70 was independent in the mobility areas of roll left and right, sit to lying, lying to sit, sit to stand, chair and bed transfer. Resident #70 had no weight loss. Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #70 was dependent on staff in the following areas of mobility: eating, oral hygiene, toileting, shower/bathing, upper body dressing, lower body dressing, putting on and taking off footwear, and personally hygiene. In…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews with resident and staff, the facility failed to provide nail care to a resident who needed extensive assistance from staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). This deficient practice affected 1 of 7 residents (Resident # 90) reviewed for ADLs. Findings included: Resident #90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body). Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #90 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with personal hygiene. Review of Resident #90's care plan revised 01/25/24 revealed a need for Activities of Daily Living (ADL)/Personal Care with the following intervention including the resident required assistance for personal hygiene, and grooming. During observation and interview on 02/26/24 at 12:03 pm, Resident #90 was observed lying in bed with fingernails on both hands that were about ½ inch long. Resident #90 stated he wanted his nails…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, resident and staff interviews and record review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement committee (QAPI) failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor interventions the committee put into place following the annual recertification and complaint surveys dated 1/18/22 and current survey 3/06/24 in the area of accurately coding Minimum Date Set (MDS). The facility also failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor interventions the committee put in place following the annual recertification and complaint surveys conducted on 1/18/22, 1/27/23 and the current survey 03/06/24, in the area of Activity of Daily Living (ADL) care provided for dependent residents. The continued failure during three federal surveys of record showed a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective QAPI program. Findings included: This citation is cross referenced to: 1 F 641 Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment in the area hearing, speech, and vision for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to implement their policy for immediately notifying the Administrator of an allegation of abuse for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #4). Findings included: The facility abuse policy, last revised 10/15/22, read in part, Any employee who witnesses or suspects that abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriate of property has occurred will immediately report the alleged incident to their supervisor, who will immediately report the incident to the Administrator. The Administrator will ensure for all allegation that involves abuse or results in serious bodily injury, the Division of Health Service Regulation, Health Care Personnel Section, and Adult Protective Services are notified immediately but no later than 2 hours after the allegation is received, and determination of alleged abuse is made. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, mild with other behavioral disturbances.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews with the consultant pharmacist, Nurse Practitioner, Medical Director, and a representative of the facility's contracted pharmacy, the facility failed to ensure there was an appropriate indication for prescribing an oral antibiotic shown to be ineffective against systemic infections for a resident with a surgical wound infection. This occurred for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for the provision of care according to professional standards. The findings included: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from another skilled nursing facility. His cumulative diagnoses included a history of a myocardial infarction (heart attack) and status post coronary artery bypass graft (a surgical procedure used to treat coronary artery disease). The resident's electronic medical record (EMR) included a Nursing Progress Note dated 4/28/23 which reported Resident #2 was being seen by a wound clinic for treatment of a surgical wound to his sternum (breastbone). A culture of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-01-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure dishware was stored and stacked clean and dry; The facility also failed to ensure the food items not provided by the facility were dated and labeled with the residents' names, dates and room numbers when stored in the snack/nourishment refrigerators; and food items served to but refused by residents were not stored in 1 of 3 residents' nourishment rooms. These practices had the potential to affect food served to residents. Findings included: 1. On 1/25/23 at 11:40 a.m., during an observation of the meal service tray line preparation, 44-food stained and/or greasy plates were stacked in the plate warmer located ready for use next to steamtable. There were also 3-sectioned/divided plates with dried food stains, one of which was also chipped stacked on the meal service trayline. There were 4-large muffin tins with dried food debris and greasy stains and 1-large (6deep) steamtable pan with dried food stains stacked on the storage rack next to clean and dry pots and pans. The Dietary Consultant removed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-01-27 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on an observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the area surrounding 1 of 1 trash compactor remained free from standing water and refuse. These unsanitary practices had the potential to affect the environment of the residents. Findings included: During an observation, accompanied by the Dietary Manager (DM) on 1/23/23 at 10:05 a.m., there was a mattress with puddles of water floating on top, lying on the ground next to the trash compactor. Also, there was a large pool of standing water and leaves beneath and surrounding the trash compactor. On 1/23/23 at 10:06 a.m., the DM stated the leaves should have been raked from beneath the trash compactor so the rainwater could drain. The DM indicated she had no knowledge why a mattress was placed on the ground next to the compactor. During an interview on 1/27/23 at 11:10 a.m., the Administrator stated that his expectation was for the facility's environmental and dietary staff to check and ensure the trash compactor and the surrounding area were free from debris when they disposed of trash from the facility.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-01-27 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of the Resident Council Minutes, the facility failed to record and respond to concerns voiced by residents during Resident Council meetings for 8 of 12 months (April, May, July, August, September, October, November and December 2022). Findings included: The Resident Council minutes were reviewed for April, May, July, August, September, October, November and December 2022 and revealed no concerns or grievances were documented from residents. The minutes indicated Resident #18, Resident #32, Resident #47, Resident # 48, Resident#52, Resident #67, Resident #73, Resident #87 and Resident # 392 attended these meetings. The identified Residents were interviewable with a BIMS (brief interview mental status) greater than 11. On 01/24/23 at 10:30 am a Resident Council meeting was held and attended by Resident #67, Resident #48, Resident # 86, Resident #392, Resident #18, Resident #47, Resident #52, Resident #50, Resident #65 and Resident #73. During the meeting the residents were notified that based on review of the Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$50,310 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $50,310 — penalty dated 2024-03-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRINCIPLE LONG TERM CARE — 40 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC