No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Adept Nursing & Rehab of Ashland

1700 Furnas Street, Ashland, NE 68003 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 97 certified beds · (402) 944-7031 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (402) 944-7031 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
3 actual-harm citations2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (19) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (65%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 28% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
11946 Standing Stone Dr · (402) 354-2273 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
21689 Northstar Dr Ste 202 · (402) 289-0431 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2301 Silver St · (402) 944-3353 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2500 Clay St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased21.9%19.0%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.6%5.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.8%1.4%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.1%2.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.1%4.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.3%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.4%4.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.1%18.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication29.2%19.3%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.9%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.2%4.0%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control34.8%25.9%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table39.7%20.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.0%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine14.8%75.9%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.2%20.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.3%11.4%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.141.811.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.191.921.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
37.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.32U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 37.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 6.2–14.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge37.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge25.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge15.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting93.1%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay4.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 3.9–13.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.581.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.52
RN hours/ resident / day
0.54
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.19
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.25
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.33
RN hoursweekends
64.7%
Total nursing turnover
84.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 97 beds and averages 75.2 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.25 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.19 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.42 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 65% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-22)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-17)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09(I) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent falls for 3 (Residents 1, 2, and 3) of 4 sampled residents. The facility census was 82. Findings are: A record review of the facility's Fall Risk Assessment dated 8/2023 revealed it was the policy of the facility to provide an environment that was free from accident hazards over which the facility had control and provide supervision and assistive devices to prevent avoidable accidents. The falls care plan would include interventions, to include supervision, in order to reduce the risk of an accident. A. A record review of Resident 1's Clinical Census dated 03/03/2025 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A record review of Resident 1's Medical Diagnosis dated 03/03/2025 revealed the resident had diagnoses of Unspecified Fracture Of Left Femur (left hip), Muscle Weakness, Other Abnormalities Of Gait and Mobility (walking and moving…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference: 175 NAC 12-006.09D7 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to protect 2 [Residents 1 and 2] of 3 sampled residents from potential burns. The facility had a total census of 88 residents. Findings are: A. A review of Resident 1's admission information in electronic medical record revealed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Quadriplegia, C5-C7 incomplete [a form of paralysis that affects all four limbs, plus the torso]. A review of Resident 1's quarterly MDS [Minimum Data Set, a comprehensive assessment used for care planning] with assessment reference date of 6/14/2023 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. According to the MDS [NAME] a score of 13 to 15 indicates a person is cognitively intact. Resident 1 was identified as requiring extensive assist of 2 plus persons for bed mobility and dressing, having total dependence with assist of 1 for toilet use and personal hygiene,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10(D) Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to administer medications according to practitioner's orders or manufacturer's recommendations by administering medications after a meal consumption for medication to be given 60 minutes prior to meals. This included observation of 25 medication administration opportunities with 3 errors resulting in an error rate of 12%. This failure affected 2 (Residents 21 and 65 ) of 3 sampled residents. The facility census was 77. Findings are: A. An observation on 7/21/25 at 7:50 AM with Medication aide (MA-A) administering medication to Resident 21 revealed the following: Omeprazole 40 mg with instructions written on medication card to be given 60 minutes prior to meals. An interview on 7/21/25 at 7:50 AM with Resident 21 confirmed that Resident 21 had eaten (genders) breakfast that consisted of oatmeal, eggs, and bacon when the Omeprazole was given. An interview on 7/21/25 at 8:00 AM with MA-A confirmed that Resident 21 had already eaten breakfast and the Omeprazole should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-22 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(E) Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide the resident/resident representative education and receive informed consent for use of psychotropic medications (any medication that affects behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) as required for 1 (Resident 10) of 1 sampled resident. The facility census was 77.Findings are:Record review of undated facility policy titled Use of Psychotropic Medication(s) revealed that Prior to initiating or increasing a psychotropic medication (drugs that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior), the resident, family, and/or resident representative must be informed of the benefits, risks, and alternatives for the medication, including any black box warnings for antipsychotic medications, in advance of such initiation or increase.Record review of the Order Summary (a listing of all current physician orders for the resident) dated 7/16/2025 for Resident 10 revealed an order for Alprazolam (an antianxiety medication) 0.5 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10(C)Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prime a insulin pen prior to administer insulin for 1 (Resident 15) of 3 sampled residents and failed to ensure 1 (Residents 15) of 5 sampled resident's who received Jardiance (an oral diabetes medication) was provided per the provider's order. The facility census was 77.Findings are:A. A record review of the undated Medication Administration policy revealed medications administered by the facility's staff would be as ordered by the provider and in accordance with professional standards. A record review of Resident 15's Clinical Census dated 07/21/2025 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A record review of Resident 15's Medical Diagnosis dated 07/21/2025 revealed the resident had diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (uncontrolled blood sugar) with other circulatory (blood flow) complications. A record review of Resident 15's Minimum Data Set (MDS)(a comprehensive assessment used…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(vi)(3)(g) Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews the facility failed to provide staff training/competency testing for use of a Trilogy machine (a noninvasive machine that provides ventilation/breathing support) for 2 (Resident 10 and Resident 21) of 2 sampled residents. The facility census was 77. Findings are: Record review of facility assessment (is a comprehensive evaluation of the facility’s resident population and the resources needed to provide appropriate care and services), reviewed with the facility’s QAA Committee (Quality Assurance Committee) on 3/13/2025 revealed the facility did not identify it had the capability and/or capacity to provide specialized respiratory care or services. A Record review of an undated facility policy titled “Noninvasive Ventilation (CPAP, BiPAP, AVAP, Trilogy)” revealed the facility’s policy is to provide noninvasive ventilation as per physician’s order and current standards of practice. Further record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-22 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 and 12-006.09(E)Based on record review and interviews; the facility failed to evaluate and implement interventions to manage triggers (any stimuli that cause a person to re-experience the trauma or its associated emotions) for 1 (Resident 21) of 1 sampled resident with a self-reported diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) through evaluation and care planning of potential triggers or situations that could lead to re-traumatization. The facility census was 77. Findings are:Record Review of Resident 21's Minimum Data Set (MDS- Federally mandated comprehensive assessment used to develop resident care plan) dated 3/28/28 revealed Resident 21 with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of a 13, which indicated a person is cognitively intact. Further review of Resident 21's MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident 21 had active diagnoses of Stroke, Hypertension (high blood pressure), Diabetes Mellitus, Anxiety Disorder, and Bipolar Disorder (a mental illness that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(F)(iii) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to update the Comprehensive Care Plan - (CCP- written instructions needed to provide effective and person centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care) to accurately reflect interventions to minimize behaviors for 2 (Residents 1 and 2) of 3 sampled residents. The facility census was 81. Findings are: Record review of the facility provided incident report dated 1/10/2025 revealed Resident 1 and Resident 2 got into an altercation. Resident 1 stuck (gender) tongue out and then Resident 2 grabbed Resident 1. The residents were immediately separated by the staff. A. Record review of Resident 1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities used to develop a resident's plan of care) dated 2/14/2025 revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE], had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - a test used to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18(B) Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to prevent cross contamination related to: 1. staff not wearing masks, 2. staff not wearing masks correctly, 3. staff carrying dirty linens next to their uniforms, and 4. reusable items potentially contaminated were not handled in a way to prevent the spread of COVID. The sample size was 5 and the facility census was 80. Findings are: A record review of facility policy titled Infection Prevention and Control dated 4/1/25 revealed: - reusable items potentially contaminated with infectious materials shall be placed in a plastic bag -soiled linen shall be collected at the bedside and placed in a linen bag. A record review of facility policy titled Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) dated 4/1/24 revealed that PPE refers to a variety of barriers used alone or in combination to protect skin and/or clothing from contact with infectious agents. It includes gloves, gowns, and face protection. A record review of Centers for Disease Control (CDC) sequence for putting on PPE…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-06-17 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04B(ii)(1) Based on interview and record review that facility failed to ensure 2 staff members (Nurse Aide (NA)-O and NA-P) that had been employed longer than one year had completed the 12 hours of continuing education required to maintain a Nurse Aide (NA) license. The sample size was 5. The facility identified a census of 83. Findings Are: A record review of education hours for 5 staff members that had been employed at the facility for more than one year revealed that 2 staff members (NA-O and NA-P) had not received 12 hours of continuing education in the last one year as required to maintain their Nurse Aide (NA) certification. A record review of the untitled document provided by the facility educator, listing the in-services provided and the education hours covering July 2023 through June 2024 revealed NA-O, who had a hire date of 2/2/2020, had received 5.5 hours of continuing education for the year. The record review of the untitled document provided by the facility educator, listing the education hours covering July 2023 through June…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 1-009.04(i) Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews; the facility failed to ensure a safe water temperatures on the Memory Care Unit (MCU). This had the potential to affect 9 of 9 sampled resident rooms on the MCU. The facility census was 83 at the time of survey. Findings are: A. In an observation performed on 6/10/24 at 10:21 AM of the facility's MCU in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] it was revealed the water temperature from the bathroom sink was 122 degrees fahrenheit (F). Further observation revealed the following water temperatures from resident's bathroom sinks: -room [ROOM NUMBER] at 10:29 AM water temperature of 127 degrees F. -room [ROOM NUMBER] at 10:34 AM water temperature of 136 degrees F. -room [ROOM NUMBER] at 10:39 AM water temperature of 131 degrees F. -room [ROOM NUMBER] at 10:42 AM water temperature of 122 degrees F. -room [ROOM NUMBER] at 10:45 AM water temperature of 122 degrees F. -room [ROOM NUMBER] at 10:48 AM water temperature of 130 degrees…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-17 · tag F0923 — pattern
    Have enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.19B Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to ensure the facility's mechanical ventilation was functioning in resident's bathroom for rooms on the Memory Care Unit (MCU). This had to affected all 9 of 9 resident rooms on MCU. The facility census was 83 at the time of survey. Findings are: In an observation on 6/10/24 at 9:44 AM of the facility's Memory Care Unit a strong and stale urine odor was noted upon entering the unit. In an observation on 6/10/24 from 10:21 AM through11:02 AM revealed the following bathroom vents were unable to pull up one square of single ply toilet paper: -10:21 AM resident room [ROOM NUMBER], -10:24 AM resident room [ROOM NUMBER], -10:29 AM resident room [ROOM NUMBER], -10:33 AM resident room [ROOM NUMBER], -10:35 AM resident room [ROOM NUMBER], -10:39 AM resident room [ROOM NUMBER], -10:42 AM resident room [ROOM NUMBER], -10:45 AM resident room [ROOM NUMBER], -10:48 AM resident room [ROOM NUMBER], -11:02 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 6 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-17 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review; the facility failed to ensure baths were provided at least once weekly for 3 (Residents 7, 36 and 87) of 5 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 83. Findings Are: A record review of the undated facility policy titled Resident Showers read as follows: Residents will be provided showers as per request or as per facility schedule protocols and based upon resident safety. A. A record review of the document titled admission Record dated 6/11/24 revealed Resident 87 had been accepted into the facility on 5/28/24 with a primary diagnoses of Muscle Wasting (when muscles waste away) and Atrophy (decrease in size of a body part, cell, organ, or other tissue, wasting) of multiple sites. A record review of the MDS (Minimum Data Set, a comprehensive assessment of each resident's physical and mental functional capabilities) dated 6/3/24, revealed Resident 87 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status, a test used to get a quick snapshot of a resident's cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09B Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities used to develop a resident's plan of care) was coded correctly for 2 residents (Residents 53 and 75) of 4 samples residents The facility census was 83 at the time of survey. Findings are: A record review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Long Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual dated October 2023 revealed that the assessments must accurately reflect the resident's status. A. A record review of Resident 53's undated admission Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A record review of Resident 53's undated Medical Diagnosis revealed a primary diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease dated 3/3/23. A review of Resident 53's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status - a test used to get a quick snapshot of a resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09H(iv) Based on interview and record review; the facility failed to ensure routine bowel movements for 2 (Residents 53 and 75) of 4 sampled residents. The facility census was 83 at the time of survey. Findings are: A review of facility policy titled Constipation Prevention dated 8/1/23, revealed laxatives will be offered if no bowel movement (BM) in 3 days. If the resident does not have a BM after a laxative has been given an assessment of the abdomen, bowel sounds, pain and appetite will be completed, and the primary physician will be notified. A. A review of Resident 53's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities used to develop a resident's plan of care) dated 5/25/24 revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status - a test used to get a quick snapshot of a resident's cognitive function, scored from 0-15, the higher the score, the higher the cognitive function) of 3, which indicates severe cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-13 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a hospice provider regarding the death for 1 (Resident 2) out of 3 sampled residents for hospice care. The facility census was 83. Findings are: Record review of Resident 2's facility's undated document titled admission Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities used to develop a resident's plan of care) revealed a readmission to the facility on 1/27/24 and a death in the facility on 3/4/24. Record review of Resident 2's Initial Plan of Care from hospice revealed an admission date to hospice of 2/22/24. Record review of Resident 2's Comprehensive Care Plan Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP- written instructions needed to provide effective and person centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care) dated initiated 2/22/2024 revealed: - The focus was for Hospice Services due…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-23 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to respect a resident's right to personal privacy during medication administration for 1 (Resident #60) of 4 residents observed for medication administration. Findings are: Record review of the facility policy titled, [Facility name] Administering Medications, revised April 2019, indicated 5. Medication administration times are determined by resident need and benefit, not staff convenience. Factors that are considered include: a. enhancing optimal therapeutic effect of the medication; b. preventing potential medication or food interactions; and c. honoring resident choices and preferences, consistent with his or her care plan. Record review of Resident #60's significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/02/2023, indicated the facility admitted the resident on 07/17/2021. Per the MDS, the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. According to the MDS, during this assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow safe medication administration infection control practices during medication administration for 1 (Resident #60) of 4 residents observed for medication administration. Findings included: Record review of a facility policy titled, [Facility name] Administering Medications, revised in April 2019, revealed, Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. The policy specified, 24. Staff follows established facility infection control procedures (e.g. [exempli gratia, for example], handwashing, antiseptic technique, gloves, isolation precautions, etc. [et cetera, and other similar things]) for the administration of medications, as applicable. Record review of Resident #60's significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/02/2023, indicated the facility admitted the resident on 07/17/2021. Per the MDS, the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-03-28 for 64 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-10-03 for 3 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVID HEALTHCARE GROUP — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 51.7+0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 51.9+1.1 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
NE 11 HOLDINGS OPCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 08/02/2023
BRASS NE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
BSD BEIS HEALTH TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
COPPER NE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
DOURO VALLEY INVESTMENT, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
GOLD NE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
NE SNF HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
SF 4140 OLDE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD REAL PROPERTY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/01/2023
SILVER NE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
TULIP INVESTMENTS NE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
SILBERSTEIN, ARIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/02/2023
BAKER, JEFFREYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/26/2026
DARNELL, PATTIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
HOLLEY, VICKIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
KIRSCHNER, DEVORAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2025
MAZZOCHI, ANABELLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2025
EHRENFELD, EUGENEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
MORNER, ASHLEYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+13.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense28% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 74%Medicare 5%Other / private 22%

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 28% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$280per resident / day
operating cost
$8,523per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$323per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NE

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nebraska Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Nebraska
$8,377/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,350/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 285140. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next