Adept Nursing & Rehab of Blue Hill
414 North Wilson Street, Blue Hill, NE 68930 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 62 certified beds · (402) 756-2080 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $13,644 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-13)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (69%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | Not rated |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 18.5% | 19.0% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.2% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.4% | 1.4% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 4.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.6% | 4.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.2% | 18.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.0% | 19.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 96.1% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.7% | 4.0% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 32.4% | 25.9% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.9% | 20.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.0% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.0% | 75.9% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 15.7% | 20.7% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.8% | 11.4% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.65 | 1.81 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.98 | 1.92 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
37.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 37.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 37.4%CMS range 24.4–51.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.4%CMS range 7.8–19.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 37.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 25.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 44.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.9%CMS range 3.8–12.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.01 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.31 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.75 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 69% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-02-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D7 Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that staff were trained to check the function of individual resident elopement prevention equipment to prevent elopement (unsupervised wandering that leads to the resident leaving the facility without facility staff knowledge). This affected 4 (Residents 1, 2, 3, and 4) of 4 residents identified as at risk for elopement. The facility census was 33. Findings are: Record review of the facility policy titled Wandering and Elopement dated 7/1/20 revealed that the facility will provide a system to identify residents at risk for unsafe wandering and elopement. The facility will provide a program of supervision and interventions to minimize risk of resident elopements. The facility will provide staff education for effective wandering/elopement management. Staff members receive appropriate training on wandering and elopement management. This will occur at a minimum, during orientation and annually. A wandering/elopement risk evaluation is completed for each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11(E) Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to ensure that the facility dishwasher was operating, ensuring facility dishes and utensils were sanitized when washed with the facility dishwasher which had the potential to affect all residents utilizing dishware from the kitchen. The facility also failed to ensure that staff handled foods and assisted residents with meals in a sanitary manner to prevent the potential for cross contamination and foodborne illness. This affected 3 of 20 residents observed (Residents 1, 192, and 11). The facility census was 38. Findings are: A. A record review of an undated facility policy titled Dishwashing: Machine Operation Guideline and Procedure Manual revealed wash temperature must reach a minimum of 120 degrees. If temperatures are not accurate, stop using the dish machine immediately. In an observation on 04/13/2025 at 6:10 PM, it was observed that the facility dishwashing machine temperature during the wash cycle was 98 degrees. In an interview completed on 04/13/2025 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.07 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) processes for identified concerns with ongoing evaluation. This had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility. Facility census was 38. Findings are: A record review of a facility policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) dated 2024 revealed the facility is to develop, implement, and maintain an effective, comprehensive, QAPI program. The facility will draw data from multiple sources including grievance logs. The data is used to develop and monitor performance indicators. The QAPI process key components include tracking and measuring performance, establishing goals, identifying and prioritizing deficiencies, systematic analyzation of underlying causes, and developing and implementing corrective action or performance improvement activities. In an interview on 04/16/2025 at 1:30 PM with the Facility Administrator (FA), the FA stated that they were the QAPI Committee…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that the resident/resident representative was provided with the required Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) notifications of the ending of their Medicare Part A skilled services (a program that covers the cost of short-term skilled nursing facility (SNF) care for up to 100 days in a SNF). This prevented the resident/resident representative from making an informed decision regarding their choice for further care and financial options, and of the right to appeal the decision. This affected 3 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents 30, 91, and 90). The facility census was 38. Findings are: Record review of the undated facility admission Agreement revealed that under written order from a physician, and as required in the comprehensive plan of care, the Facility will provide specialized rehabilitative services such as physical, occupational, and speech therapy by qualified personnel. The facility participates in the Medicare Program and is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.19(A) Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.19(B) Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that rooms were clean and maintained for 5 of 16 residents observed (Residents 33, 10, 15, 2, and 29). The facility census was 38. Findings are: Record review of the facility's undated admission Agreement Attachment 3 titled Resident Rights revealed that the resident has the right to a dignified existence. A facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life. The resident has the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The facility must provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The facility must provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior including adequate and comfortable lighting levels…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10(D) Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Observations of 27 medications administered revealed 13 errors for 3 (Residents 194, 13, and 17) of 3 sampled residents, resulting in an error rate of 48.15%. The facility census was 38. Findings are: Record review of the policy Medication Errors dated 08/01/2023 revealed the purpose of the policy is to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident ensuring residents receive care and services safely in an environment free of significant medications errors. Under the subheading Policy Explanation and Compliance stated the facility must ensure that it is free of medication error rates of 5% or greater as well as significant medication error events. Paragraph 4 states that medication errors include errors in administration times. Paragraph 7 stated to prevent medication errors and ensure safe medication administration, nurses should verify the following; (a) right medication, dose route, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and observation; the facility failed to ensure that hand hygiene was performed between residents during medication administration to 3 (Residents 17, 31, and 26) of 3 sampled residents and during wound care for 1 (Resident 29) of 1 sampled resident to prevent the potential for cross contamination and infection. The facility census was 38. Findings are: Record review of CDC Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Health Care Settings dated 2007 revealed the use of alcohol-based hand rub or washing with soap and water should be done between patients when performing cares. A. Observation on 4/14/2025 at 9:00 AM of Medication Aide (MA) C while passing medications in the dining room. MA-C did not perform hand hygiene as required between Residents 17, 31, and 26 while preparing and administering medications. Interview on 4/14/2025 at 9:20 AM with MA-C confirmed the MA did not perform hand hygiene as required during medication preparation and administration between Residents 17, 31, and 26. B. A review of a facility policy titled Wound Treatment Management dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(H) Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that interventions were put into place to prevent further potential abuse or self-harm for 1 (Resident 190) of 1 sampled residents. The facility census was 38. Findings are: Record review of the policy Compliance with Reporting Allegations/Neglect Exploitation dated 10/2023 state the policy of this facility is to report all allegations of abuse/neglect/exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown sources and misappropriation of resident property are reported immediately to the Administrator of the facility and to other appropriate agencies in accordance with current state and federal regulations within prescribed time frames. The procedure states the following procedures will be initiated: 1. The licensed nurse will; -Respond to the needs of the resident and protect him/her from further incident, -Notify the Administrator or designee, -Notify the attending physician, family or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(G) Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow a resident's identified desired plans for discharge for 1 (Resident 30) of 5 sampled residents. The facility census was 38. Findings are: A record review of a facility policy titled Discharge Planning Process dated 09/13/2023 revealed it is the policy of the facility to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process that focuses on the resident's discharge goal. If discharge to the community is a goal, an active discharge care plan will be implemented. A record review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident 30 on 11/01/2024 with diagnoses that included Osteomyelitis (an infection in the bone) of the left foot, Type 2 Diabetes (a common form of diabetes mellitus that develops especially in adults and most often in obese individuals and that is characterized by hyperglycemia resulting from impaired insulin utilization coupled with the body's inability to compensate with increased insulin production), and Peripheral Vascular Disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(vi)(2) Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide individualized 1 on 1 activities and engage residents in facility activities for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident 10). The facility census was 38. Findings are: Record review of the facility policy titled Activities dated 2/4/25 revealed that it is the facility policy to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities based on their comprehensive assessment, care plan, and preferences. Facility sponsored group, individual, and independent activities will be designed to meet the interests of each resident. Activities will encourage both independence and interaction within the community. Activities refers to any endeavor, other than routine ADLs (Activities of Daily Living- basic everyday tasks including bathing, eating, dressing, getting in and out of bed, and toileting), in which a resident participates that is intended to enhance her/his sense…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iii)(2) Based on observation record review and interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders to promote healing of a pressure related skin injury for 1 (Resident 29) of 1 sampled resident. The facility census was 38. Findings Are: A record review of a facility policy titled Wound Treatment Management dated 11/28/2023 revealed to promote wound healing it is the policy of the facility to provide treatments in accordance with physician orders and current standards of practice. A record review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident 29 on 04/19/2024 with diagnoses of dementia (a usually progressive condition marked by the development of multiple cognitive deficits such as memory impairment, aphasia, and the inability to plan and initiate complex behavior) and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a common form of diabetes mellitus that develops especially in adults and most often in obese individuals and that is characterized by hyperglycemia resulting from impaired insulin utilization coupled with the body's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0923 — isolatedHave enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-007.04(D) Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure that bathroom exhaust vent fans were functioning for 2 of 16 residents observed (Residents 34 and 10). The facility census was 38. Findings are: Record review of the facility's undated admission Agreement Attachment 3 titled Resident Rights revealed that the facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life. The resident has the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The facility must provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The facility must provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. A. Observation on 4/14/25 at 8:00 AM in the bathroom of Resident 10 revealed that the bathroom exhaust vent would not pull up a 1-ply square of toilet paper. Observation on 4/16/25 at 12:48 PM in the room of Resident 10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11E Based on observation, record review, and interview; the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment for food storage and preparation. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving food from the facility kitchen. The facility stated census was 34. Findings Are: Review of a facility policy titled Kitchen Sanitization dated 10/2008 revealed Kitchen and dining room surfaces not in contact with food shall be cleaned on a regular schedule and frequently enough to prevent accumulation of grime. The food services manager will be responsible for scheduling staff for regular cleaning of kitchen and dining areas. During an observation completed on 05/19/2024 at 8:50 AM the following was observed: -Three cupboards missing doors in the kitchen storage meal prep area of the kitchen exposing dishes stored in these cupboards to be exposed. -Black, brown sticky substance to the handle area of all cupboard doors along the back wall of the main kitchen area. -Cloudy yellow white adhered substance to the stainless steel hood above the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.09D8b1 Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.09D8b Based on record review and interviews; the facility failed to evaluate, revise, and implement interventions for weight loss and the nutritional needs for 3 (Resident 1, 4, and 28) of 8 sampled residents. The facility census was 34. Findings are: Review of a facility policy titled Weight Monitoring dated 08/01/2023 revealed based on the resident's comprehensive assessment the facility will ensure that all residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that this is not possible or resident preferences indicate otherwise. Weight can be a useful indicator of nutritional status. Significant unintended changes in weight (loss or gain) or insidious weight loss (gradual unintended loss over a period of time) may indicate a nutritional problem. The facility will utilize a systemic approach to optimize a resident's nutritional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.10D Based on observation, record review, and interviews; the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Observations of 32 medications administered revealed 4 errors resulting in an observed medication error rate of 12.5%. The errors affected 3 residents (Residents 19, 5, and 16) of 6 residents observed during medication administration. The facility census was 34. Findings are: A. Record review of the facility policy titled Insulin Pen dated 4/24/24 revealed it is the facility policy to use insulin pens in order to improve the accuracy of insulin dosing. Insulin pens will be primed prior to each use to avoid collection of air in the insulin reservoir. The section titled Procedure revealed instructions to attach the pen needle: Remove the pen cap from the insulin pen; wipe the rubber seal with an alcohol pad; screw the pen needle onto the insulin pen; twist open and remove the outer cover from the pen needle. The instructions for priming the insulin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.10D Based on observations, record review, and interviews; the facility failed to ensure that staff followed procedure for blood glucose (blood sugar) monitoring which had the potential for inaccurate blood glucose results, and failed to ensure that staff followed procedure for priming of insulin pens to ensure residents received the physician ordered dose of insulin to prevent significant medication errors. This affected 3 of 3 residents observed (Residents 19, 5, and 16). The facility census was 34. Findings are: A. Record review of the facility policy titled Blood Glucose Monitoring dated 11/28/23 revealed that the nurse will perform the blood glucose test utilizing the facility's glucometer (a medical device used to measure and display the amount of sugar in the blood for residents with diabetes) as per manufacturer's instructions. The section Procedure revealed perform hand hygiene and put on gloves. Select the puncture site. Clean the intended site with an alcohol…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview; the facility staff failed to ensure the resident choice for advance directive (a written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment, made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate), and code status (an instruction from you to your medical team about what the medical team should do if you have a cardiac or respiratory arrest) was documented accurately throughout the resident medical record for 2 (Resident 27 and 23) of 16 residents reviewed. The facility staff identified a census of 34. Findings are: The undated facility policy titled, Medical Emergency Response revealed under policy explanation and compliance guidelines: -The employee who first witnesses or is first on the site of a medical emergency, that are trained, will initiate immediate action, including CPR as appropriate, basic first aid and summon for assistance. -CPR will continue unless: a. there is a DNR order in place. b. there are obvious signs of clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(1) Based on record review and interviews; the facility failed to provide 2 (Resident 88 and Resident 91) of 3 sampled residents with the cost of continuing to receive skilled Medicare Services, a choice of whether to appeal the facilities Medicare determination to discontinue services, or the reason for the discharge from skilled Medicare services. The facility census was 34. Findings are: A review of the policy Advance Beneficiary Notices dated 08/02/2023 revised on 08/29/2023 state: -It is the policy of this facility to provide timely notices regarding Medicare eligibility and coverage. -The Business Office Manager is the contact person for information regarding Medicare eligibility, coverage, and applying for benefits. -The facility shall inform Medicare beneficiaries of his or her potential liability for payment. -Additional notices shall be issued to Medicare beneficiaries when appropriate. a. If a reduction in care occurs and the beneficiary wants to continue to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.05(5)a Based on record review and interviews; the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative of the facility decision to discharge the resident from the facility for 1 (Resident 89) of 3 sampled residents. This prevented the resident from returning to the facility. The facility census was 34. Findings are: Record review of the facility policy titled Transfer and Discharge (including AMA- against medical advice) dated 8/1/23 revealed it is the policy of the facility to permit each resident to remain in the facility and not initiate transfer or discharge for the resident from the facility except in limited circumstances. The facility will evaluate and determine the level of care needed for the resident prior to admission to ensure the facility's ability to meet the resident's needs. Once admitted , the resident has the right to remain at the facility unless the transfer or discharge is necessary for the resident's welfare and the resident's needs cannot be met in the facility, or the health of individuals in the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.05(5) Based on record review and interviews; the facility failed to provide the resident/resident representative with written notice of transfer and discharge from the facility. This affected 1 (Resident 89) of 3 sampled residents. The facility census was 34. Findings are: Record review of the facility policy titled Transfer and Discharge (including AMA- against medical advice) dated 8/1/23 revealed it is the policy of the facility to permit each resident to remain in the facility and not initiate transfer or discharge for the resident from the facility except in limited circumstances. The facility's transfer/discharge notice will be provided to the resident and the resident's representative. Generally, the notice must be provided at least 30 days prior to a facility-initiated transfer or discharge of the resident. Exceptions to the 30-day requirement include when an immediate transfer or discharge is required by the resident's urgent medical needs; or the resident has not resided in the facility for 30 days. In these exceptional cases, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-00-09B Based on record review and interviews; the facility failed to accurately complete resident assessments for 2 (Resident 23 and Resident 1) of 4 sampled residents. The facility stated census was 34. Findings are: Review of a facility policy labeled Minimum Data Set (MDS, which is a mandatory comprehensive assessment tool that measures the health status of nursing home residents and is used for care planning) 3.0 Completion dated 08/01/2023 revealed persons completing part of the assessment must attest to the accuracy of the section they completed by signature and indication of the relevant sections. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument manual dated 10/2023 revealed Parenteral Feeding, (which is an introduction of a nutritive substance into the body by means other than the intestinal tract) and Feeding Tube (which is the presence of any type of tube that can deliver nutritional substances directly into the gastrointestinal system). A. Review of an admission Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening Resident Review (PASARR- federally mandated screening program to ensure Nursing Home residents with mental illness and/or developmental disabilities receive the care and services they need in the most appropriate settings) screen was accurately completed or a new PASSAR initiated to determine if a Level II PASARR review was warranted for 1 (Resident 42) of 2 sampled residents. The facility census was 34. Findings are: Review of Resident 3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-a mandatory assessment tool used for care planning) dated 05/03/2024 revealed the resident was admitted [DATE] with the diagnoses of psychotic disorder (a severe mental disorder that causes abnormal thinking and perceptions) and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest and can interfere with one's daily activities). In addition, the assessment indicated the resident received an antipsychotic (a type of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.09D2b Based on observation, record review, and interviews; the facility failed to perform wound care consistent with professional standards of practice to promote wound healing for 1 (Resident 1) of 4 sampled residents. The facility stated census was 34. Findings are: Review of a facility policy titled Negative Pressure Wound Therapy dated 08/01/2024 revealed Negative pressure wound therapy will be provided in accordance with physician orders. Clean technique shall be utilized unless otherwise specified by the physician. Use and application of the therapy shall be in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations. Review of 3M Vacuum Assisted Closure (VAC) Therapy Clinical Guidelines dated 2021 revealed under foot wound application technique item #2 to protect intact skin, apply drape or vapor-permeable adhesive film dressing from the wound edge to the anterior aspect of the wound. Item #4 ensure the foam does not come in contact with intact skin. Review of facility policy titled Clean Dressing Change dated 08/01/2024 revealed it is the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.09 Based on observation, record review, and interviews; the facility failed to assess and manage pain during wound care for 1 (Resident 1) of 4 sampled residents. The facility census was 34. Findings are: A review of a admission Record dated 05/23/2024 indicated Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of: osteomyelitis (which is an infection in the bone), of the right ankle and foot, peripheral vascular disease (which is a condition where blood vessels narrow and reduce blood flow to the limbs of the body), and pressure ulcers (which are skin and tissue injury due to pressure over a bony prominence), of the right and left heels. Resident 1's 5 Day Minimum Data Set (MDS, which is a mandatory comprehensive assessment tool that measures the health status of nursing home residents and is used for care planning), dated 04/14/2024 revealed Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 indicating the resident was moderately cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.017D Based on observation, record review, and interviewa; the facility failed to adhere to infection control practices to prevent the potential for cross contamination and infection prevention during wound care for 1 (Resident 1) of 4 sampled residents. The facility stated census was 34. Findings are: Record review of a facility policy titled Clean Dressing Change dated 08/01/2023 revealed to loosen the tape and remove existing dressing, remove gloves, wash hands, and put on clean gloves, cleanse the wound as ordered, remove gloves, wash hands, and put on clean gloves, apply and secure new dressing, remove gloves and wash hands. Record review of document labeled CDC Clinical Safety: Hand Hygiene for Healthcare Workers dated 02/27/2024 revealed hands should be sanitized with soap and water or alcohol-based hand sanitizer (ABHS), immediately after glove removal. Gloves should be used when needed for when you anticipate that you will encounter blood or other infections materials, mucous membranes, non-intact skin, potentially contaminated skin,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-13 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.07c Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a Quality Assurance Process Improvement Plan of action (a systematic data driven approach to improving the quality of care and services provided to residents, to correct a facility identified problem) related to elopements (unsupervised wandering that leads to the resident leaving the facility without notice). This has the potential to affect 4 (Residents 1, 2, 3, and 4) residents within the facility who were identified as elopement risks. The facility census was 33. Findings are: A record review of the facility supplied document labeled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan dated April 2014 revealed the facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility wide QAPI Plan designed to monitor and evaluate the quality and safety of resident care, pursue methods to improve care quality, and resolve identified problems. Under objectives of the QAPI Plan are the following: - Provide a means to identify and resolve present and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident to resident (Residents 2 and 3) sexual abuse investigation report was submitted to the state agency within the required 5 working days. The facility census was 30. Findings are: Record review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program dated April 2021 revealed that the facility will identify and investigate all possible incidents of abuse. The facility will investigate and report any allegations within timeframes required by federal requirements. Record review of the progress note for Resident 2 dated 12/1/23 at 7:30 PM revealed that Resident 2 was sitting next to Resident 3 in the facility television room. Resident 2 had their hands touching Resident 3 in their private areas underneath Resident 3's clothing. Resident 3 told Resident 2 to stop. Record review of the progress note for Resident 2 dated 12/1/23 at 8:12 PM revealed that the Facility Administrator (FA) reported the incident to Adult Protective Services. Record review of the email…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-28 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolatedHonor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D3 Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to evaluate a residents need for continued laxative use when having diarrhea for 1 resident (Resident #5) of 4 sampled residents. The facility census was 30. Findings are: A review of an admission Record dated 12/28/2023 revealed the facility admitted Resident #5 on 12/11/2023 with a diagnosis of: displaced fracture of left humerus with surgical intervention (left shoulder fracture with surgery to repair). Record review of Resident #5's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a comprehensive assessment used to develop a resident's care plan) dated 12/17/2023 revealed Resident #5 was cognitively intact. The MDS further revealed Resident #5 was dependent on staff assistance with transfers, bed mobility, and toileting hygiene. The MDS revealed Resident #5 was always continent of bowel and occasionally incontinent of urine. Record review of Resident #5 Care Plan dated 12/28/2023 revealed no goals or interventions related to Resident 5's toilet use or bowel and bladder continence.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-05-03 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — widespreadPerform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.17 Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that Covid-19 testing was completed as required to prevent the potential for Covid-19 infection. This had the potential to affect all facility residents. The facility census was 40. Findings are: Record review of the facility policy titled Coronavirus Disease (Covid-19) Vaccination of Staff dated October 2022 revealed that staff not yet fully vaccinated or that have a pending or granted exemption (a request, or approved request, to not receive the Covid-19 vaccination due to a medical or non-medical circumstance) will adhere to additional precautions intended to mitigate (prevent) the spread of Covid-19. The list is not explicit and does not specify which actions to take. Actions included weekly Covid-19 testing. Staff who refuse to comply may be subject to disciplinary action. Interview on 5/1/23 at 12:50 PM with the Facility Administrator (FA) confirmed that the facility Covid-19 mitigation for unvaccinated staff and staff with exemption from Covid-19 vaccination was that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-03 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a required written bed hold notification (written information outlining options for holding or reserving a resident's bed while the resident is absent from the facility for hospitalization) was provided to the resident/resident representative for 2 residents (Residents 27 and 10). This prevented the resident/resident representative from making an informed decision to either request a bed hold (a reservation that allows a resident to return to the facility) or release the resident bed. The facility census was 40. Findings are: A. Record review of the facility policy titled Bed-Holds and Returns dated March 2022 revealed that Residents and/or representatives are informed (in writing) of the facility bed-hold policies. All residents /representatives are provided written information regarding the facility bed-hold policies well in advance of any transfer (in the admission packet), and at the time of transfer (or, if the transfer was an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-03 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.09C1a Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a review of the baseline care plan (a written plan required to be developed within 48 hours of admission detailing the instructions needed to provide initial effective and person-centered quality care for a resident) was completed with the resident/resident representative and failed to ensure that the resident/resident representative was provided a written summary of the baseline care plan as required for 6 residents (Residents 27, 10, 37, 14, 141, and 142) of 7 residents reviewed. This prevented the resident/resident representative from identifying additional care concerns for inclusion in the care plan. The facility census was 40. Findings are: A. Record review of the facility policy titled Care Plans-Baseline dated December 2016 revealed that a baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate needs shall be developed for each resident within twenty-four hours of admission. The facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.11E Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that facility staff did not reuse trays during meal service to prevent the potential for cross-contamination and foodborne illness for 14 residents observed (Residents 7, 10, 20, 141, 143, 29, 5, 3, 33, 9, 32, 12, 6, and 24); and the facility failed to ensure that staff handled foods in a manner to prevent the potential for cross-contamination and foodborne illness. The facility census was 40. Findings are: A. Record review of the Nebraska Food Code, Effective date 7/21/16, 4-602.11 revealed that food contact surfaces and utensils shall be cleaned at any time during the operation when contamination may have occurred. Observation on 4/30/23 at 12:17 PM in the facility dining room revealed Dietary Aide-A (DA-A) carried a tray with meals from the kitchen service window to the table of Residents 5 and 29. DA-A sat the tray on the table between the unmasked residents and delivered the meal plates and bowls to the residents. DA-A picked up the tray and carried it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
D. Observation of Resident 14 on 5/02/23 at 11:22 AM revealed Resident 14 was sitting in their recliner in their room talking on the phone. Resident 14 had an indwelling urinary catheter (a tube inserted into and left in the bladder to drain urine) and the catheter urine collection bag was not in a cover and was hanging on the trash can that had visible garbage in it. E. Observation of Resident 18 on 5/1/23 at 10:11 AM revealed Resident 18 was sitting in their wheelchair in the hall. Resident 18 had an indwelling urinary catheter and the tubing connecting the catheter bag to the catheter was dragging on the floor. F. Observation of Resident 141 on 4/30/23 at 2:25 PM revealed Resident 141was sitting in the recliner in the living room. Resident 141 had an indwelling urinary catheter and the catheter urine collection bag was uncovered and laying on the floor. Interview with the VPCS (Vice President of Clinical Services) on 5/02/23 at 4:45 PM revealed the facility did not have a policy for the storage of catheter tubing and catheter bags. Interview with the DON (Director of Nursing) on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.05 (21) Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident dignity was maintained for Resident 14 by failing to place a visual barrier between the bathroom and the room door which placed Resident 14 at risk for exposure if a staff person or another resident opened the door while Resident 14 was using the bathroom. This affected 1 of 3 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 40 at the time of survey. Findings are: Observation of Resident 14's room on 4/30/2023 at 5:40 PM and 5/1/23 at 10:16 AM revealed the room did not have a bathroom door or a curtain and the bathroom, including the toilet, was visible from the hall/open door placing Resident 14 at risk for exposure if a staff person or another resident inadvertently opened the room door. Interview with the DON (Director of Nursing) on 5/02/23 at 4:20 PM revealed the bathroom door had been removed because Resident 14's arms were getting bumped on the door as Resident 14 had to be transferred onto the toilet with a mechanical sit-to-stand lift. The DON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-03 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.05 (4) Based on interview and record review; the facility failed to honor bathing preference for 1 of 1 sampled residents, Resident 19. The facility identified a census of 40 at the time of survey. Findings are: Review of Resident 19's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set-a comprehensive assessment used to develop a resident's care plan) dated 4/4/23 revealed an admission date of 12/24/2019. Resident 19 was dependent upon facility staff for bathing. Interview with Resident 19's family member on 4/30/23 at 3:31 PM revealed they had requested Resident 19 receive 2 baths a week but maybe only gets one or the bath gets skipped. Resident 19's family member revealed that sometimes it looked like Resident 19 had gone a while without a bath due to Resident 19's unclean appearance. Observation of Resident 19 on 5/01/23 at 10:18 AM revealed Resident 19 was sitting in a wheeled recliner in the living room. The skin on Resident 19's face was flaking and their hair was greasy. Review of Resident 19's Care Plan dated 12/5/2020 revealed Resident 19 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09D1c Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to assist residents with activities of daily living (ADLs) for 2 residents (Residents 19 and 25). This affected 2 of 3 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 40 at the time of survey. Findings are: A. Review of Resident 19's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set-a comprehensive assessment used to develop a resident's care plan) dated 4/4/23 revealed an admission date of 12/24/2019. Resident 19 was dependent upon facility staff for bathing. Interview with Resident 19's family member on 4/30/23 at 3:31 PM revealed they had requested Resident 19 receive 2 baths a week but maybe only gets one or the bath got skipped. Resident 19's family member revealed that sometimes it looked like Resident 19 had gone a while without a bath due to Resident 19's unclean appearance. Observation of Resident 19 on 5/01/23 at 10:18 AM revealed Resident 19 was sitting in a wheeled recliner in the living room. The skin on Resident 19's face was flaking and their hair was greasy.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.18B Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain toilet risers to prevent a potential accident hazard for Resident 141. This affected 1 of 3 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 40 at the time of survey. Findings are: Review of Resident 141's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set-a comprehensive assessment used to develop a resident's care plan) dated 4/23/2023 revealed Resident 141 required limited assistance of one staff person for toilet use. Observation of Resident 141's bathroom on 4/30/23 at 3:43 PM revealed the toilet riser was not secured to the toilet. The toilet riser style had handles on the side with the screw type lock on the front. Observation of the toilet riser in Resident 141's bathroom with the DON (Director of Nursing) on 5/01/23 at 2:00 PM revealed it was not secured to the toilet. Interview with the DON at that time revealed the toilet riser should have been secured to the toilet and that staff should have been monitoring the toilet risers. Interview with the FA (Facility Administrator)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$13,644 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $13,644 — penalty dated 2024-02-13
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AVID HEALTHCARE GROUP — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 2.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOURO VALLEY INVESTMENT, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/02/2023 |
| NE 11 HOLDINGS OPCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/02/2023 |
| BRASS NE TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/02/2023 |
| BSD BEIS HEALTH TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/02/2023 |
| COPPER NE TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/02/2023 |
| GOLD NE TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/02/2023 |
| NE SNF HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/02/2023 |
| SF 4140 OLDE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD REAL PROPERTY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/01/2023 |
| SILVER NE TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/02/2023 |
| TULIP INVESTMENTS NE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/02/2023 |
| JACKSON, DIXIE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 08/02/2023 |
| SILBERSTEIN, ARI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 08/02/2023 |
10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $123K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NE
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nebraska Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 285144. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.