No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Adept Nursing & Rehab of South Sioux City

3501 Dakota Avenue, South Sioux City, NE 68776 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 72 certified beds · (402) 494-4273 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited May 2023Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$33,784 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2023
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $33,784 in federal fines (most recent 2023-11-01)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3250 Plaza Dr · (402) 412-4220 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Hy-Vee0.8 mi
2501 Cornhusker Dr · (402) 494-4675 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
605 W 29th St · (402) 404-2520 · Call to confirm hours
Park
E 37th St. · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
3601 Dakota Ave · (402) 494-5461

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased18.4%19.0%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.3%5.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.4%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.6%2.8%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.9%4.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.3%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury9.5%4.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened19.4%18.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.7%19.3%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.0%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.6%4.0%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.5%25.9%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table26.2%20.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%2.0%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine62.8%75.9%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.5%20.7%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.4%11.4%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.951.811.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.481.921.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 41 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

37.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
58.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy

Met the expected recovery: 58.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 51 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF37.0%CMS range 25.2–48.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.1%CMS range 8.2–13.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge58.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge35.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge41.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.3%CMS range 3.6–11.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.831.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.80
RN hours/ resident / day
1.02
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.82
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.63
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.66
RN hoursweekends
39.2%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 72 beds and averages 37.2 residents a day — about 52% occupied, or roughly 35 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.80 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.82 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.91 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.85 to 0.66 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-20)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-27)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-11-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.12 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that anti-seizure medications (medication to prevent seizures) was provided for Resident 1 to prevent potential seizures (a burst of uncontrolled electrical activity between brain cells stiffness, twitching, or limpness) and pain-relieving medication were provided for Resident 2. This affected 2 (Resident 1 and 2) of 3 sampled residents. The total facility census was 49. Findings are: A record review of the undated Pharmacy Services policy revealed the pharmacist along with the facility and medical director should have strived (tried) to assure that medications were requested, received, and administered in a timely manner as ordered by the prescriber (doctor, nurse practioner, physician assistant, etc.). A record review of the Form of Pharmaceutical Services Contract dated 09/01/2023 revealed the pharmacy would deliver medications to the facility 7 days per week, 365 days per year on a daily delivery…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    LICENSURE REFERENCE 175 NAC 12-006.04(F)(i)(5) Based on interview and record review; the facility failed to notify Resident 3's physician of a change in condition related to cellulitis to the resident's left stump and a significant weight gain. The sample size was 7 and the facility census was 40. Findings are: A.Review of the facility policy Notification of Changes with a revised date of 2/23/26, revealed the purpose of the policy was to ensure the facility promptly informed the resident, consulted the resident's physician, and notified the resident's representative when there was a change requiring notification. Circumstance which required notification included:-accidents resulting in an injury and which had the potential to require physician intervention.-significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial condition such as a deterioration in health, mental and psychosocial status.-circumstances which could require a need to alter treatment which could include a new treatment or discontinuation of a current treatment based on adverse consequences, an acute…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to follow physician's orders for Resident 1's daily weights. The sample size was 4 and the facility census was 41. Findings are: A record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-federally mandated comprehensive assessment used to create resident care plans) dated 8/21/25 revealed the resident had debility with cardiorespiratory (heart and lung) conditions including atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm), Congestive Heart Failure (CHF-failure of the heart to beat effective and having the potential for buildup of excess fluid lungs, legs, and other parts of the body), Hypertension (high blood pressure) and Renal insufficiency (declined in or non-optimal kidney function), and was taking insulin, antipsychotic, antibiotic, and diuretic (reduces fluid volume by increasing urine output) medications. The resident's weight was 216 pounds with no significant loss or gain.A record review of Resident 1's Care Plan dated 8/15/25 revealed the resident took a diuretic medication for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.04(D) Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(G)Based on observation, record review, and interview; the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing related to call light response times. This had the potential to affect all residents who were able to activate use of their call light. Findings are:A. Review of the Facility Assessment for The Palms at Regency Square with a revised date of 6/6/25 revealed:-The facility assessment was used to make staffing decisions to ensure that there were sufficient number of staff to care for the residents as identified through resident assessments and plans of care. B. An observation on 8/17/25 revealed Resident 53's call light was turned on at 9:04 AM. The resident was hollering out for help at 9:20 AM and the call light was answered at 9:31 AM, (the call light was on for 26 minutes).An interview with Resident 53 on 8/17/25 at 10:25 AM revealed Resident 53 reported staff take over 15 minutes to answer the call light many times. Review of the facility Device Activity Report (record of call light…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-20 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure gradual dose reductions were attempted or documented clinical contraindications were completed for Resident 1's antipsychotic and antianxiety medications, and Resident 2 and 23's antidepressant medications. The sample size was 5 and the facility census was 44. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Use of Psychotropic Medication with a revision date of 8/25 revealed the following;-It was the intent of the policy to ensure residents only received psychotropic medications when other nonpharmacological interventions were clinically contraindicated. Additionally, those medications were only used to treat resident's medical symptoms and not used for discipline or staff convenience. -adequate indications for use referred to the identified, documented clinical rationale for administering a medication based on assessment of the resident's condition and therapeutic goals and after other treatments were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.12Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to obtain signed consent for the use of psychotropic (affects the brain and nervous system, altering mood, perception, cognition, and behavior) medications prior to use to ensure the resident's responsible party was educated on the benefits and risks prior to the medication being used for Resident 1. The sample size was 5 and the facility census was 44. Findings are: Review of the facility policy Use of Psychotropic Medication with a revision date of 8/25 revealed the following;-It was the intent of the policy to ensure residents only received psychotropic medications when other nonpharmacological interventions were clinically contraindicated. Additionally, those medications were only used to treat resident's medical symptoms and not used for discipline or staff convenience. -adequate indications for use referred to the identified, documented clinical rationale for administering a medication based on assessment of the resident's condition and therapeutic goals and after other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure Resident 16 had a documented duration of use for an antibiotic. The sample size was 23 and the facility census was 44. Findings are: Review of the facility policy Antibiotic Stewardship Program last revised 6/1/25 revealed the purpose of the program was to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use. The program included antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use. Antibiotic use protocols included:-nursing staff were to assess residents who were suspected to have an infection and notify the physician, -laboratory testing would be in accordance with current standards of practice, and -all prescriptions for antibiotics would specify the dose, duration, and indication for use. Monitoring antibiotic use included:-staff would monitor responses to antibiotics to determine if the antibiotic was still indicated, -antibiotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18Based on observation, record review, and interview; the facility failed to utilize the required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE-gowns and gloves) during the provision of cares for Resident 23 who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). The sample size was 3 and the facility census was 44. Findings are: Review of the facility policy Enhanced Barrier Precautions last revised on 5/30/25 revealed the facility was to implement EBP for the prevention of transmission-based Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDRO's). EBP referred to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of MDRO's that employed targeted gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities. An order for EBP would be obtained for residents with wounds (chronic wounds, diabetic foot ulcers, unhealed surgical wounds) or indwelling medical devices (such as catheters).Implementation of EBP: gowns and gloves available immediately near or outside of the resident's room and PPE for EBP was necessary when performing high-contact care activities.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 12.006.04(F)(i)(5) Based on record review and interview the facility failed to notify the physician of a change in condition for 1 (Resident 3) of 3 residents sampled. The facility census was 56. The findings are: Record review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 09-12-2024 revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident: -Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was scored as a 4. According to the MDS Manual a score of 0-7 indicate a person has severe cognitive impairment. -Required extensive assistance with hygiene, bathing, toileting, dressing and transfers. Record review of the facility's undated list of residents with infections in the last 3 months revealed Resident 3 had an ear infection on 10-10-2024. Record review of Resident 3's progress notes dated 10-07-2024 revealed Resident 3 had a fever of 101.5 with tenderness and drainage from the left ear. Furthermore, the progress note dated 10-07-2024 indicated the medical practitioner was called and the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-09-24 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespread
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure reference: 175 NAC 12-007.04(G) Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff were notified to residents calls for assistance within facility. This has the potential to affect all 52 residents of the facility. Findings are: A. A review of Resident 3's admission Record revealed Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Cerebral Infarction [stroke] and fracture of the shaft of the left fibula [a break in the outside bone of the lower leg]. A review of Resident 3 MDS [Minimum Data Set; a comprehensive assessment used for care planning] dated 9/2/24 identified Resident 3 as having a score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status indicating Resident 3 is cognitively intact. In an interview on 9/24/24 at 9:41 AM, Resident 3 reported that Resident 3 had woke up at 6:00 AM and noted blood on the bed from the scratch on Resident 3's arm. Resident 3 reported they put on the call light and waited for 2 hours, no one answered and then…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure reference: 175 NAC 12-006.09 Based on record review and interview, the facility staff failed to ensure care was provided without delay for a changes in condition of a wound for 1 [Resident 3] of 3 sampled residents. The facility had a total census of 52 residents. Findings are: A review of Resident 3's admission Record revealed Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Cerebral Infarction [stroke] and fracture of the shaft of the left fibula [a break in the outside bone of the lower leg]. A review of Resident 3 MDS [Minimum Data Set; a comprehensive assessment used for care planning] dated 9/2/24 identified Resident 3 as having a score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status indicating Resident 3 is cognitively intact. A review of Resident 3's Care Plan with a focus area dated 9/10/24 revealed Resident 3 had a cat scratch on right forearm with the following interventions identified: -Encourage good nutrition and hydration in order to promote healthier skin dated 9/11/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2024-06-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.11(E) Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to a) ensure food products were disposed of prior to expiration dates, b) failed to implement and maintain the cleaning of food preparation equipment and surfaces to prevent the potential for food borne illness. This had the potential to affect 48 of 49 residents who eat from the kitchen. The facility census was 49. Finding are: During the initial kitchen tour on 06/24/24 from 9:05AM to 9:30 AM revealed the following: The walk-in refrigerator: -Gallon of 2% milk found in the walk-in refrigerator was open and only had ½ contents left was undated. In the walk-freezer: -Walk-in freezer had visible frost/ice buildup on the outside of the freezer door on the lower portion near the floor. The ice build-up covered the full length of the freezer door and approximately 8 inches high. -Unlabeled, undated bag of what appeared to be frozen egg patties or waffles observed inside walk-in freezer. In the reach-in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.19 Based on observations and interviews: the facility staff failed to maintain hallyway carpets in the center hallway, south hallway and the common area between 400 north and south hallways with the potential to effect 35 residents, failed to ensure2 (room [ROOM NUMBER], 402 and 405) ventilation covers were clean and failed to ensure a privacy curtain was in 1 residents room, room [ROOM NUMBER]. The facility staff identified a census of 49. Findings are: Observations on 6/24.2024 between 8:40 AM and 9:30 AM of the environmental tore revealed the following: - A shared toilet between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] that lacked doors on both sides of the toilet. -Lingering strong urine smell in room [ROOM NUMBER]. -Bathroom ventilation's covers in rooms 310, 402, 405 covered with a gray fuzzy substance, resembling dust. -Stains (irregular shaped discolored blotches significantly darker than the surrounding carpet) down the Center, and South Hallways, and in the common area between 400…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.18 Based on observation, interview and record review: the facility staff failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed after glove changes during peri care, catheter care, and wound care and failed to prevent potential cross contamination during these cares by placing the washcloths in the sink basins and on the bed covers without a barrier for 2 of 2 residents surveyed (Residents 1 and 21). The facility claimed a census of 49. Findings are: A. Record Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 05-25-2024 revealed Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Heart Failure, Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, Schizophrenia, and Morbid Obesity. The MDS indicated Resident 1 had an indwelling catheter and required maximal assistance from staff to roll in bed, perform upper body dressing and personal hygiene and was dependent on staff to perform transfers, bathing, lower body dressing, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer for 1 (Resident 252) and/or their representative upon transfer to the hospital and failed to notify a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 2 of 2 (Resident 1 and 252) residents sampled for hospitalizations. The facility census was 49. Findings are: A. Review of a Electronic Health Record (EHR,, is a digital version of a patient's paper chart)) for Resident 252 revealed Resident 252 had a fall on 05/25/24 and was transferred by ambulance to the hospital at 11:45 PM and returned to the facility on [DATE] at 2:31 AM. No bed hold notice was given to the resident or responsible party at time of transfer. On 05/26/24 at 12:30 PM Resident 252 was transferred by ambulance to the hospital. No bed hold notice was given to the resident or responsible party at time of transfer. An interview with the Social Services Director (SSD) on 06/26/24 at 10:50 AM confirmed that the facility did not give…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a written notice of a bed hold for 2 (Resident 252 and 1) of 2 sampled residents. The facility census was 49. Findings are: A. A review of medical record for Resident 252 revealed Resident 252 had a fall on 05/25/24 and was transferred by ambulance to the hospital at 11:45 PM and returned to the facility on [DATE] at 02:31 AM. No bed hold notice was given to the resident or responsible party at time of transfer. On 05/26/24 at 12:30 PM Resident 252 was transferred by ambulance to the hospital. No bed hold notice was given to the resident or responsible party at time of transfer. Facility's Bed Hold Notice Upon Transfer Policy dated 8/1/23 revealed the following: At time of emergency transfer the resident and/or resident representative will be informed of bed hold option. The details of the bed hold will be provided in writing to the resident and/or resident representative soon as possible. An interview with Social Services Director (SSD) on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening Resident Review (PASARR, a federally mandated screening process to ensure Nursing Home residents with mental illness and/or developmental disabilities receive the care and services they need in the most appropriate setting) was accurately completed for 1 (Resident 34) of 2 sampled residents. The facility sample was 49. Finding are: Record review of Resident 34's admission Minimum Date Set ( MDS, a federally mandatory assessment tool used for care planning) dated 07/14/2023 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Unspecified Dementia, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, and Delusional Disorder. Record review of PASARR Level 1 screening form dated 07-12-2023 revealed Resident 34 was assessed as having no diagnosis or suspicion of Serious Mental Illness (SMI) or Intellectual Disability or Related Condition (ID/RC). Interview with the Social Services Director on 06/26/24 at 10:00 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09(H)(iii)(3) Based on observation, interview and record review;the facility staff failed to conduct skin evaluations and failed to provide wound treatments in the order time frames for 1( Resident 21) of 1 Residents. The facility census was 49. Findings are: A. Record review of Resident 21's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 05-21-2024 revealed Resident 21 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of morbid obesity, alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver, left above the knee amputation and was a carrier of Methicillin Resistant Staph Aureas (MRSA, is a staph bacteria that does not get better with the type of antibiotics that usually cure staph infections). The MDS also revealed Resident 21 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment that aids in detecting cognitive impairment. A score of 0-7 equals severe impairment, 8-12 indicates moderate impairment and 13-15 indicates cognitively intact) score…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number NAC 175 12-06.09(H)(iii)(2) Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a ordered treatment for 1 (Resident 37) of 3 sampled residents for wound care. The facility identified a census of 49. Findings are: Record review of Resident 37's (Treatment Administered Record) TAR for June 2024 revealed a treatment order for Resident 37's left heel ,was Skin Prep daily with an order date of 6/5/2024. An observation on 6/26/24 at 6:56 AM revealed (Registered Nurse) RN-A came into Resident 37's room to complete the residents wound care. RN-A had poured Betadine in a medication cup outside of the room and brought this medication cup into the room and reported the Betadine was for Resident 37's left heel ulcer. Further observation revealed RN-A using a cotton ball applied the Betidine to Resident 37's left heel. On 06/26/24 at 10:56 AM a interview was conducted with the (Director of Nursing) DON. During the interview the DON reported the treatment should have been performed as ordered. The DON confirmed the treatment order to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09(l) Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent reoccurring falls for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 40). The facility census was 49. Findings are: Record Review of Resident 40's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 05-14-2024 revealed Resident 40 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment that aids in detecting cognitive impairment. A score of 0-7 equals severe impairment, 8-12 indicates moderate impairment and 13-15 indicates cognitively intact) score of 7 indicating severe impairment. The MDS also revealed Resident 40 had the diagnosis' of End Stage Renal Disease, Heart Failure, Diabetes Mellitus and Depression. According to the MDS Resident 40 needed partial assistance from staff for bed mobility, transfers, oral hygiene and upper body dressing and maximal assistance from staff for lower body dressing, bathing and personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09(J) Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physicians' orders for the administration of tube feeding for 1 (Resident 42) of 1. The facility identified a census of 49. Findings are: Record review of Resident 42's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool for Medicare and Medicaid residents) dated 2/22/2024 revealed Resident 42 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of a 8. According to the MDS [NAME] a score of 8 to 12 indicates a persons cognition is moderately impaired. Record review of Resident 42's MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident 42 was receiving tube feeding. Record review of a practitioners order dated 6-21-2024 revealed Resident 42's practitioner order Novasource renal ( a feeding formula) to be given at 65 milliliters (ml) per hour for 12 hours. An observation on 06/26/2024 at 7:1 5 AM of Resident 42 revealed Resident 42's tube feeding was being administered via gravity (a method to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure targeted behaviors were identified, and that behavior monitoring for psychotropic medication was initiated for one resident (Resident 4) of 2 residents surveyed. The facility had a census of 49. Findings are: Record review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Sets (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool for residents on Medicare and/or Medicaid) dated 5/28/2024 revealed Resident 4 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS - a federally mandated tool to assess residents' cognitive function) of 15, indicating Resident 4 was cognitively intact. According to Resident 4's MDS dated [DATE] Resident 4 had the following diagnoses: Non-infective gastroenteritis and colitis, Type 2 Diabetes, Bipolar disorder, Malignant primary neoplasm, insomnia, Obesity, Muscle wasting and atrophy, anemia, Hypertension, cognitive communication deficit, repeated falls. Record review of a Order Summary Report (OSR) dated 6/25/2024 for Resident 4 revealed the practitioner…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D3(2) Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D1c Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to provide toileting for 1 (Resident 4) and failed to answer call lights for 4 (Resident 1,7,11, and 12) of 5 total sampled residents. The facility census was 53. Findings; A. Record Review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool use for care planning) dated 11/21/2023 revealed under section GG, Resident 4 was dependent on staff to perform toileting, bathing, grooming and wheelchair mobility. Under section H of the MDS, Resident 4 was identified as totally incontinent of bowel and bladder. Record Review of Resident 4's Care Plan revealed Resident 4 needed extensive to total assistance from staff with activities of daily living due to dementia. Resident 4 is incontinent of bowel and bladder and wears adult briefs. Staff are to assist Resident 4 by checking and changing the adult briefs every 2-3 hours.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.04C3a(6) Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify 1 (Resident 1) of 1 sampled residents the provider and the resident's representative of a medication that was unavailable. The facility census was 49. Findings are: A record review of the facility's undated Notification of Changes policy revealed the facility must inform or notify the resident's family member or legal representative when there is a change requiring such notification. Circumstances (situations) that required notification included a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial condition. A. A record review of Resident 1's Clinical Census dated 10/31/2023 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A record review of Resident 1's Medical Diagnosis dated 10/31/2023 revealed the resident had diagnoses of: Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia (sudden and long-term respiratory failure with low oxygen), Epilepsy (a neurological…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(8) Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an alleged incident of abuse for 1 (Resident 3) of 3 sampled residents to Adult Protective Services (APS) and to The State of Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). The total facility census was 49. Findings are: A record review of the Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation (taking advantage of a resident) Prohibition (forbidding) and Prevention Program Policy dated 09/01/2018 revealed all covered individuals, including mandated reporters, employees and long-term care communities have an obligation to report all allegations of abuse, neglect, or exploitation to the appropriate state agencies immediately, but no later than 24 hours after the allegation or occurrence. A report of the investigation was to be provided to the state agency within 5 working days of the incident. A record review of Resident 3's Progress Notes revealed on 10/18/2023 at 2:54 AM another resident was found standing over Resident 3 and attempted to undress them. Resident 3 attempted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.05(9) Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to protect Residents 35 and 95's right to be free from resident-to-resident physical abuse and to protect Resident 7's right to be free from neglect related to a fall with injury. The sample size was 4 and the facility census was 42. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Prohibition and Prevention Program with a revision date of 9/1/18 revealed the policy was a mechanism for the prompt identification, investigation and reporting of any allegation or complaint of abuse, neglect or exploitation. The policy indicated allegations of potential abuse were to be immediately reported to a supervisor, the facility Administrator or designee and in accordance with the state and federal laws. If there was reasonable suspicion of a crime or if serious bodily injury occurred then the report was to be made immediately but no later than 2 hours. Allegations were to promptly be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(8) Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to complete investigations of potential resident-to-resident abuse for Residents 95 and 35 and a fall with injury for Resident 7 and to assure completed investigations were sent to the State Agency within 5 working days. In addition, the facility failed to submit the results of an investigation of potential staff-to-resident abuse involving Resident 6 within the required time frame. The sample size was 4 and the facility census was 42. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Prohibition and Prevention Program with a revision date of 9/1/18 revealed the policy was a mechanism for the prompt identification, investigation and reporting of any allegation or complaint of abuse, neglect or exploitation. The policy indicated allegations of potential abuse were to be immediately reported to a supervisor, the facility Administrator or designee and in accordance with the state…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.04 Based on interview and record review; the facility failed to have staff who were trained and certified in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR-emergency procedures performed if a person stops breathing or their heart stops) for transportation of residents identified as having a full code (if a person's heart stopped beating and/or they stopped breathing, all resuscitation procedures would be provided to keep them alive) status. This had the potential to affect all 13 (Residents 195, 16, 145, 38, 37, 45, 96, 25, 26, 32, 2, 1 and 97) residents identified as having as a full code. The facility census was 42. Findings are: Review of the facility list of residents with a full code status revealed the following residents were designated as a full code; Residents 195, 16, 145, 38, 37, 45, 96, 25, 26, 32, 2, 1 and 97. During an interview on [DATE] at 12:39 PM, the Consultant Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the following: -any residents who had an appointment were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY C. Review of the facility policy titled Obtaining a Fingerstick Glucose, with a revision date of 10/2011 revealed staff should do the following: -review the resident's care plan and provide for any special needs, -assemble equipment and supplies, -use individual devices for individual residents, -place the equipment on the bedside stand or overbed table, -ensure blood glucose meters are cleaned and disinfected between resident uses, and, -clean and disinfect reusable equipment according to the manufacturer's instructions and current infection control standards of practice. On 5/11/23 at 8:50 AM observation of RN-T knocked and entered Resident 97's room. Resident 97 was in isolation. RN-T performed hand hygiene, obtained supplies from the mediation cart which included the resident's glucometer supply container and the resident's scheduled insulin. RN-T stopped outside of the resident's room, performed hand hygiene and applied a mask. RN-T knocked and entered the resident room and placed the resident's glucometer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.051 Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide the required Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) to Resident 22 prior to discharge from Medicare services. The sample size was 3 and the facility census was 42. Findings are: Review of Resident 22's Skilled Nursing Facility Protection Notification Review revealed the resident's Skilled Services Episode began on 11/14/22 and the Last Covered Medicare Day was 12/14/22. The Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage was provided to the resident on 12/12/22, however the facility did not provide the resident/resident representative with the required information related to the reasons and costs of the non-covered Medicare benefits. During an interview on 5/10/23 at 2:00 PM the facility Consulting Administrator confirmed the facility had not completed the required ABN's for Resident 22.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D5b Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide an individualized activity program to meet the needs of Resident 13. The sample size was 14 and the facility census was 42. Findings are: Review of the facility policy Azria Activity Programs dated June 2018 revealed the activity program was provided to support the well-being of residents and to encourage both independence and community interaction. The Activities were offered based on resident-centered assessments and designed to encourage maximum individual participation and geared to the individual resident's needs. Review of Resident 13's Minimum Data Set (MDS-federally mandated assessment used to develop resident Care Plans) dated 2/15/23 revealed the resident was severely impaired cognitively, and displayed inattention and disorganized thinking. Resident 13 had dementia and depression and received extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, toileting and dressing. Review of Resident 13's Care Plan with a revision date of 5/8/23 revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09Da Based on record review and interview the facility failed to identify a potential safety risk related to the use of an electric lift chair resulting in a fall with injury for Resident 7. The sample size was 5 and the facility census was 42. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Azria Falls dated 3/2018 revealed the following; -the facility identified individuals with a history of falls and risk factors for falling, -residents with repetitive falls often had identifiable underlying cause/s, -staff evaluated and documented falls that occurred while the individual was in the facility; for example, when and where they happen, and any observations of the event, -identified falls as witnessed or unwitnessed, -identified possible fall causes within 24 hours, -collected and evaluated information until a cause was determined, or it was determined a cause could not be found, -identified pertinent interventions to prevent subsequent falls and to address potentially significant consequences, -monitored and documented the individual's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D8b Based on observation, record review, and interview; the facility failed to implement recommendations for ongoing weight loss for Resident 97. The sample size was 5 and the facility census was 42. Findings are: Review of the facility policy Weight Assessment and Intervention, last revised 9/2008 revealed the following: -the multidisciplinary team would strive to prevent, monitor, and intervene for undesirable weight loss, -nursing staff would measure resident weights on admission, the next day and weekly for 2 weeks, if no weight concerns, weight would be measured monthly thereafter, -weights were to be recorded for each resident, -any weight change of 5 pounds or more or 3 pounds or more if the resident was under 100 pounds would be retaken, if verified, nursing would notify the dietary manager or dietician, -the dietician would review records and follow trends, negative trends would be evaluated by the interdisciplinary team (IDT), -significant unplanned and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09D Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address Resident 16's behavioral needs. The sample size was 18 and the facility census was 24. Findings are: Review of Resident 35's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used for care planning) dated 3/22/23 revealed the resident was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses of non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety, depression and mood disturbance. The assessment indicated the resident's cognition was moderately impaired. The assessment revealed no evidence of behaviors, and the resident mood interview was conducted with no mood indicators identified. Review of Resident 35's Nursing Progress Notes revealed the following: -8/30/22 at 5:10 PM resident self-propelled wheelchair to the dining room, next to another resident who was also propelling a wheelchair. Resident 35 asked the other resident if they wanted a kiss. Resident 35 was redirected this was inappropriate; and -8/31/22 at 5:13…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$33,784 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $33,784 — penalty dated 2023-11-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVID HEALTHCARE GROUP — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.9+0.1 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.4+1.6 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
NE 11 HOLDINGS OPCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 08/02/2023
BRASS NE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
BSD BEIS HEALTH TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
COPPER NE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
DOURO VALLEY INVESTMENT, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
GOLD NE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
NE SNF HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
SF 4140 OLDE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD REAL PROPERTY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/01/2023
SILVER NE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
TULIP INVESTMENTS NE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
JACOBSON, HOLLIEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 08/02/2023
SILBERSTEIN, ARIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/02/2023

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$460K
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 56%Medicare 7%Other / private 37%

This home reported $460K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$379per resident / day
operating cost
$11,534per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$381per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NE

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nebraska Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Nebraska
$8,377/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,350/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 285076. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next