Adept Nursing & Rehab of Waverly
11041 North 137th St, Waverly, NE 68462 · For profit - Corporation · 54 certified beds · (402) 786-2626 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $25,642 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-17)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (78%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 31% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 18.9% | 19.0% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.6% | 5.1% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.0% | 1.4% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.8% | 2.8% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 11.5% | 4.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 1.7% | 0.3% | 0.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.6% | 4.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 21.3% | 18.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 26.0% | 19.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.0% | 96.1% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.7% | 4.0% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.2% | 25.9% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.9% | 20.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.0% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 48.1% | 75.9% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.7% | 20.7% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 19.4% | 11.4% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 64.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.2%CMS range 6.0–12.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 64.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 57.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 64.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.4%CMS range 4.6–15.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.54 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 54 beds and averages 43.5 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.74 to 0.73 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 78% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
32 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 Based on record review and interview; facility staff failed to follow protocol related to incomplete assessments when determining the death of 2 of 3 sampled residents; Resident 1 was pronounced dead and later discovered breathing while at the funeral home and Resident 2 had no evidence vital signs were assessed and verified at the time of death. The facility was notified on [DATE] at 4:20 PM of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on [DATE]. The IJ was removed on [DATE], as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. The facility census was 48. Findings are: A review of the facility's undated checklist Death In Facility revealed the following related to procedures for a resident death: -Note the absence of vital signs, no BP (blood pressure), no Pulse, no Respirations. -Notify the responsible party. -Call the physician and obtain a telephone order for the Time of Death, permission to release body to mortuary, physician name and indicate whether an autopsy was to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-02-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 Based on record review and interview; the facility staff failed to evaluate, implement practitioner's orders, and initiate notification of emergency medical personnel for a change in condition for 1 (Resident 1) of 4 sampled residents. This caused the resident to not receive emergency care services resulting in the death of the resident. The facility census was 50. Findings are: A. A record review of Resident 1's Discharge Summary Sheet dated 2/12/2024 revealed the following diagnoses: - Pulmonary Hypertension (Higher pressures in the right side of the heart), - Congested Heart Failure (Failure of the heart), - Atrial fibrillation (An abnormal beat of the heart), - Venous insufficiency (Lack of sufficient blood flow through the veins), - Essential (primary) hypertension ( High blood pressure), - Altered mental status (Confusion or disorientation). Record review of Resident 1's Advanced Directive Information sheet dated October 2023, revealed Resident 1's wish was to receive CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation). Record review of a facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.19(A) Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the bathroom air vents were clean in three resident rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBER]) out of 12 resident rooms sampled. The facility census was 42 at the time of the survey. Findings are: An observation during the initial facility tour on 2.23.2026 at 10:00 AM revealed a thick, fuzzy, grey material on the bathroom air vents (removes moisture and odors to prevent mold, mildew, and damage to fixtures) in three resident rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBER]) out of 12 rooms observed. An observation on 2.24.2026 at 12:52 PM with the Administrator (ADM), revealed a thick, fuzzy, grey material on the bathroom air vents in rooms [ROOM NUMBER]. During an interview on 2.24.2026 at 12:52 PM with the ADM, it was confirmed the resident bathroom air vents in rooms [ROOM NUMBER] were dirty and needed cleaned. During an interview on 2.24.2026 at 1:21 PM with the Housekeeping District Manager (Hsk DM) confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have 1 resident (Resident 2) referred for a level 2 PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) evaluation based off of Resident 2 current medical diagnosis and failed to include a diagnosis to the level 2 PASARR for 1 resident (Resident 14) of 4 sampled residents. The facility census was 42.A.A record review of the admission Record with a printed date of 2/24/26 revealed that Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Diabetes (high blood sugar), cellulitis of left upper limbs (skin infection ), Hypertension (High blood pressure), Atrial Flutter (fast heart rate), and Pain in Shoulder. On 11/25/25 a diagnosis was added of irritability and anger, and disorientation, On 12/23/2025 a diagnosis was added of Visual Hallucinations. On 1/28/26 a diagnosis was added of Major Depressive disorder, recurrent, severe with psychotic symptoms (experiences intense, debilitating depression…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10(D)Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5%, which affected 2 residents (Residents 10 and Resident 12) of 3 sampled residents. The medication error rate was 8%. The facility census was 42. Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10(D) A.A record review of the admission Record dated 2/25/26 for Resident 10 revealed Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the current diagnosis of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction (Hemiplegia (total paralysis) and hemiparesis (weakness) are common, often severe, consequences of cerebral infarction (ischemic stroke) resulting from brain tissue damage), depression (persistent sadness, loss of interest, and physical symptoms like exhaustion), anxiety (excessive, persistent fear disrupts daily life), and Cognitive communication Deficit (an impairment in communication) .An observation of medication administration pass on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure reference number 175 NAC 12.006.18(D) Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene for 1 resident (Resident 7) of 1 sampled resident. Facility census was 42. Findings are: During an observation on 02/24/2026 at 1:20 PM Licensed Practical Nursing (LPN)-A gathered Personal Protective Equipment (PPE- specialized clothing or gear designed to protect workers from physical, chemical, biological or radiological hazards) to complete Resident 7's wound care. LPN-A placed PPE on an empty bed that had clean linens and then washed LPN-A hands for 20 seconds. LPN-A proceeded to tell Resident 7 that LPN-A was going to complete wound care to resident coccyx wound, Resident 7 then rolled to their left side on their own. LPN-A donned (put on) PPE in the following order: gown, mask, face shield then gloves, then began to wash Resident 7's wound with normal saline and gauze. LPN-A dried the wound, removed dirty gloves and placed them in the trash can, LPN-A then put a new pair of gloves on without performing hand hygiene. LPN-A completed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10(D) Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10(A)(ii) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 (Residents 4 and 5) of 2 sampled resident's insulin (a hormone produced in the pancreas which regulates the amount of glucose in the blood) was administered as ordered and to ensure staff followed the 5 rights for medication administration. The facility census was 44. Findings are: A record review of the facility's Timely Administration of Insulin policy dated 8/23 revealed: -All insulin will be administered in accordance with physician's orders. -Insulin administration will be coordinated with mealtimes and bedtime snacks unless otherwise specified in the physician orders. -Procedure includes reviewing the resident's name, medication name, medication dosage, time to be administered, and the route of the administration. A record review of the facility's Medication Administration policy dated 8/2023 revealed: - Ensure that the six…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-04-08 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.19(A) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the ceiling ventilation (vent) covers in the facility were cleaned and sanitized to prevent cross contamination. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Total census was 46 residents. Findings are: A record review of the facility's Routine Cleaning and Disinfection policy dated 08/2023 revealed that routine cleaning and disinfection of visible soiled surfaces would be performed in common areas. An observation on 04/07/2025 at 11:40 AM revealed the flat ceiling vent in the entrance foyer (sitting area), conference room, above the nurse's station, in the ceiling at the entrance to the dining room, at the end of the Havelock hall, and at the end of the [NAME] hall all had a brown fuzzy substance on them. An observation on 04/08/2025 at 6:47 AM revealed the flat ceiling vent in the entrance foyer (sitting area), conference room, above the nurse's station, in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09(h)(vi)(3)(g) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident 1) of 1 sampled resident's oxygen concentrator (a machine that purifies oxygen) was functioning properly and that the settings were per the provider's orders. Total facility census was 46 residents. Findings are: A record review of the facility's undated Oxygen Concentrator policy revealed the staff was responsible for the use and care of oxygen concentrators and receive training on oxygen safety and the functionality of the device. Oxygen is administered under orders of the attending physician, except in the case of an emergency. A record review of the Invacare Operator's Manual Platinum Series concentrator manual revealed if the yellow indicator light was on by the exclamation point (!) indicator, the machine was only producing 73 percent (%) - 75% oxygen purity and the supplier should be called IMMEDIATELY. A record review of Resident 1's Clinical Census dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-12-05 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure posting of the daily nursing staffing was current and contained all the required information. This had the potential to affect all the facility residents. The facility identified a census of 47. Findings are: Observation on 12/2/24 at 11:38 AM and 2:40 PM revealed missing posting for the daily census sheet. Observation on 12/3/24 at 8:20 AM and 3:15 PM revealed missing postings for the daily census sheet. Observation on 12/4/24 at 7:15 AM revealed missing postings for the daily census sheet. An interview on 12/4/24 at 8:09 AM with the Administrator (ADM) revealed the facility did not have a policy for daily nursing staffing posting. An interview on 12/4/24 at 8:15 AM with Human Resources (HR) confirmed the posting is missing for December 2nd, 3rd, and 4th of 2024. An interview on 12/4/2024 at 8:30 AM with the ADM, confirmed the posting of the daily nursing staffing was not posted for December 2nd, 3rd, and 4th of 2024.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.18(D) Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.18(B) Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.19(A) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dietary staff performed handwashing for greater than 20 seconds to prevent foodborne illness, that the kitchen ceiling ventilation covers (vents) and light fixtures were clean to prevent cross contamination, and that all walls and the ceiling were in safe condition. The had the ability to affect 45 residents that consumed food from the kitchen. Findings are: A. A record review of the facility's Handwashing Guidelines for Dietary Employees policy dated 8/2023 revealed handwashing was necessary to prevent the spread of bacteria that may cause foodborne illnesses. Turn on water and moisten hands, cover with soap and rub vigorously for at least 20 seconds. An observation on 12/04/2024 at 09:50 AM revealed the facility's [NAME] (Cook-A) performed handwashing 8 seconds and gloved prior to food preparation. Cook-A got a knife and cut onions in quarters on cutting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.19A Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the walls, floors, door frames, light fixtures, exhaust fans, urine smells and baseboards in 14 rooms (rooms: 104,107,109, 112, 114, 116, 118, 119, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126). The facility identified a census of 47. Findings are: Observations on 12/05/2024 between 9:05 AM and 9:45 AM with the facility Administrator (ADM) and the Corporate Nurse (CN) identifying the following environmental concerns during the environmental tour of the facility: -The ceiling fans in rooms: 104,107,109, 112, 114, 116, 118, 119, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126 did not pull tissue to the fan during the tissue test and were covered in a gray fuzzy substance. -Resident rooms: 104,107,109, 112, 114, 116, 118, 119, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126 had holes in drywall, walls with missing paint in. -There was a strong smell of urine present from resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. -In room [ROOM NUMBER] there was a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 20 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.10(D) Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Observation of 40 medications revealed 14 errors resulting in an error rate of 35%. The medication errors affected 3 (Resident 10, 21, and 199) of 5 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 47. Findings are: A. A record review of the facility's Timely Administration of Insulin policy dated 8/2023 revealed it was the policy of the facility to provide timely administration of insulin in order to meet the needs of each resident and to prevent adverse effects on a resident's condition. All insulin would be administered in accordance with physician's orders. A record review of the facility's Medication Administration policy dated 8/2023 revealed the staff should have obtained vital signs when applicable or per physician's orders. Ensure that the six rights of medication administration were followed: right resident, right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.10(D) Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.10(A)(ii) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 (Residents 10 and 21) of 5 sampled resident's Insulin was administered as ordered and ensure staff followed the 5 rights for medication administration for 1 (Resident 199) of 5 sampled residents. The facility census was 47. Findings are: A. A record review of the facility's Timely Administration of Insulin policy dated 8/2023 revealed it was the policy of the facility to provide timely administration of insulin in order to meet the needs of each resident and to prevent adverse effects on a resident's condition. All insulin would be administered in accordance with physician's orders. A record review of the facility's Medication Administration policy dated 8/2023 revealed the staff should have obtained vital signs when applicable or per physician's orders. Ensure that the six rights of medication administration were followed: right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.02(H) Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident 10) of 1 sampled resident's abuse investigation was sent to the State Agency within 5 working days. The facility census was 47. Findings are: A record review of the facility's undated Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy revealed the Administrator would follow up with government agencies, during business hours, to confirm the initial report was received and to report the results of the investigation when final within 5 working days of the incident, as required by state agencies. A record review of the facility's Possible Abuse investigation dated 10/22/2024 revealed an investigation of the potential abuse on 10/22/2024 for staff to resident abuse was completed and the event happened 10/22/2024 at 12:45 PM. A record review of the facility's Self Report - Act#1089191/ dated 10/29/2024 revealed Possible Abuse investigation dated 10/22/2024 was emailed to DHHS Health Facility Investigations on 10/29/24 at 3:38 PM. In an interview on 12/04/2024 at 2:06 PM, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09C(i) Based on the record review and interviews, the facility failed to complete an admission MDS (Minimum Data Set, a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities) for Resident 196 (1 of 4 sampled residents) in the required time frames. The facility census was 47. Findings are: Record review of admission Record dated 12/2/24 revealed Resident 196's admission was 10/21/24. Record review of MDS date 11/6/24 was started but not completed. The documentation indicated the MDS was in progress. An interview on 12/4/24 at 12:30 PM with the Minimum Data Set Cordinator confirmed that Resident 196's MDS dated [DATE] is late. An interview on 12/4/24 at 12:32 PM with the Director of Nursing confirmed that Resident 196's MDS dated [DATE] is late. Record review of CMS's RAI Version 3.0 Manual 2024 revealed: 5.2 Timeliness Criteria - For the admission assessment, the MDS Completion Date (Z0500B) must be no later than 13 days after the Entry Date (A1600).
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09(I) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure interventions were added to prevent falls for 1 (Resident 10) of 1 sampled resident. The facility census was 47. Findings are: A record review of the facilities Incident and Accidents policy dated 8/2023 revealed the purpose of incident reporting could include assuring that appropriate and immediate interventions are implemented and corrective actions are taken to prevent recurrences. A record review of Resident 10's Clinical Census dated 12/03/2024 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A record review of Resident 10's Medical Diagnosis dated 12/03/2024 revealed the resident had diagnoses of fall from bed, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following other cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side (a condition that is a result from damage to the right side of the brain), congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.18(B) Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was followed in an Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) room for 1 (Resident 1) of 1 sampled residents. This had the potential to affect all residents EBP. The facility failed to ensure the staff performed hand hygiene for 2 (Resident's 4 and 21) of 2 sampled residents during cares this had the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. The facility failed to ensure Resident 21's BiPAP filter was cleaned or replaced to prevent cross contamination. This had the potential to affect 1 (Resident 21) of 1 sampled resident. The facility identified a census of 47. Findings are: A. A review of the facility Policy: Enhanced Barrier Precautions dated 04/01/2024 revealed the following: It is the policy of this facility to implement enhanced barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO). Initiation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 4-006.09(H) Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure daily weights were completed physician's order on 4 (Residents 1,3,5 and 6) of 4 sampled residents. The total facility census was 47. Findings are: A record review of the facility's Weight Monitoring policy dated 02/23/2023 revealed the facility would develop a weight monitoring schedule upon admission and if clinically indicated, monitor weights daily. A. A record review of Resident 1's Clinical Census dated 08/28/2024 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged on 07/09/2024. A record review of Resident 1's Medical Diagnoses dated 08/28/2024 revealed the resident had diagnoses of Acute Systolic (Congestive) Heart Failure (CHF), Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), Need For Assistance With Personal Care, and Morbid Obesity (severely overweight). A record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS)(a comprehensive assessment used to develop a resident's care plan)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 4-006.04(G) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensuring nursing staff level were maintained to provided bathing for 4 (Resident 3,4,5 and 6) of 4 sampled residents. The total facility census was 47. Findings are: A record review of the facility's Resident Showers policy dated 08/2023 revealed the residents would be provided showers as per request or as per facility schedule protocols. A record review of the Bath QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement dated 08/15/2024 revealed an identified opportunity for improvement was that residents were not getting the minimum of 2 baths per week or based on bathing preferences and a bathing schedule would be made per resident request. No audits had been completed. A. A record review of Resident 3's Clinical Census dated 08/28/2024 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A record review of Resident 3's Medical Diagnoses dated 08/28/2024 revealed the resident had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H) Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to monitor wounds for 2 (Residents 5 and 8) of 2 sampled residents. The facility census was 46. Findings are: Review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities used to develop a resident's plan of care), dated 5/24/24, confirmed the following: -admission Date 3/20/24 and most recent reentry on 5/20/24 from the hospital -Diagnosis of septicemia (bacterial infection in blood), diabetes and osteomyelitis (infection in the bone) -Has an infection of the foot, surgical wound and received surgical wound care and application of dressings to feet Review of Resident 5's comprehensive care plan (CCP- written instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care.), dated 8/8/24, revealed the following: -Focus: Surgical Wound: Resident has a surgical wound and is at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iii)(2) Based on observations, record review and interview; the facility staff failed to monitor a pressure ulcer condition for 1 (Resident 10) of 1 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census 46. Findings are: Review of Resident 10's Minimum Data Set,( MDS, afederally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 6/21/24, revealed that following: -admitted to the facility on [DATE] and the most recent reentry was on 8/3/23 from the hospital -Functional limitation in Range of Motion to both lower extremities -Required total assist from staff with bed mobility and transfers -Has an indwelling catheter (tube inserted into the bladder for continuous drainage of urine) and colostomy (procedure that creates an opening for the large intestine in the abdomen to allow passage of stool) -Diagnoses of paraplegia (loss of muscle function in the lower half of the body) and spina bifida (a birth defect that causes the spinal cord not to develop properly)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-06.18E Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to safely transport a resident after sliding out of a wheelchair during transport. This affected 1 (Resident 1) of 1 sampled resident. The facility census was 50. Findings are: Record review of a hand written statement dated 1/31/24 revealed Van Driver-E transported Resident 1 to an appointment at the hospital on 1/31/2024 when the facility van was on the interstate 80 and another vehicle crossed over into the lane the facility van was in resulting in Van Driver-E slamming on their breaks. The statement revealed Van Driver E was notified by Resident 1 that [gender] was sliding out of the wheelchair and was sitting on the foot pedals of the wheelchair. Then, Van Driver E pulled off of the interstate to check on Resident 1 and observed a right restraint belt was pulled out of the floor mount latch. Then, Van Driver E proceeded to drive the van to the hospital to request assistance with lifting Resident 1. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11E Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods were dated upon opening and failed to ensure the facility staff food/drinks were not stored in the refrigerator used to store resident foods to prevent the potential for cross contamination. This had the potential to affect all 48 residents receiving food from the kitchen. The facility had a census of 48. Findings are: An observation on 1/03/24 at 7:05 AM of the freezer labeled #1 revealed the following: - a bag of tator-tots (potatoes) that was open and undated, - 2 bags of frozen onion chips/rings, both opened and undated. An observation of the fridge used for resident food storage on 1/03/24 at 7:05 AM revealed the following: - an opened bottle of soda belonging to the kitchen staff - a bottle of grape jelly was opened and undated An interview on 1/03/24 at 7:10 AM with Dietary Manager (DM)-H confirmed food was to be dated upon opening. During the interview, DM-H confirmed that the soda belonged to (gender) and confirmed that staff food and drink…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09D6(7) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a complete, valid prescription was completed for 3 (Residents 33, 35, and 153) of 5 sampled resident's non-invasive ventilators (NIV)(a machine used to assist with breathing with a mask), ensure 1 (Resident 35) of 5 sampled residents had an order for oxygen, and ensure 2 (Residents 26 and 33) of 5 sampled resident's oxygen order was followed. The total facility census was 48. Findings are: A. A record review of the facility's undated Noninvasive Ventilation policy revealed it was the policy of the facility to provide noninvasive ventilation as per physician's orders and current standards of practice. The facility would obtain an order for the use of NIV and settings from the practioner. A record review of Resident 33's Clinical Census dated 01/04/2024 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A record review of Resident 33's Medical Diagnosis dated 01/04/2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09D6(7) Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09D3(1) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 3 (Residents 33, 35, and 153) of 5 sampled resident's Non-Invasive Ventilator (NIV)(a machine used to assist with breathing with a mask) masks were cleaned daily and failed to ensure 1 (Resident 153) of 2 sampled resident's urinary catheter bag was off the floor to prevent the potential for cross contamination. The total facility census was 48. Findings are: A record review of the facility's undated Noninvasive Ventilation policy revealed it was the policy of the facility to provide noninvasive ventilation as per physician's orders and current standards of practice. The facility would follow the manufacturer instructions for the frequency of cleaning/replacing the supplies. A. A record review of Resident 33's Clinical Census dated 01/04/2024 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A record review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04C3a(6) Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the provider of blood sugar results outside of ordered parameters for 1 (Resident 6) of 1 sampled resident. The facility census was 48. Findings Are: A. A record review of the Demographic Information (undated) revealed, that the facility readmitted Resident 6 on 12/29/23 with diagnoses of: Sepsis (the body's extreme response to an infection) and secondary Diabetes Mellitus type 2 (DMII -- a long-term medical condition in which your body doesn't use insulin properly, resulting in unusual blood sugar levels) and Chronic Congestive Heart Failure (a long-term condition in which your heart can't pump blood well enough to meet your body's needs). A record review of the MDS (Minimum Data Set, a comprehensive assessment of each resident's physical and mental functional capabilities) dated 12/31/23 revealed, that Resident 6 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status, a test used to get a snapshot of a resident's cognitive function, scored from 0-15, the higher the score,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05 Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident or their representative of the facility's bed hold policy upon transfer to the hospital for 1 (Resident 42) of 1 sampled resident. The census was 48. Findings are: A record review of Resident 42's Medical Chart did not reveal a copy of the bed hold policy for the 11/16/2023 hospital visit. A record review of Resident 42's Progress Notes on 11/16/23 did not reveal any documentation regarding the bed hold policy when Resident 42 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. An interview on 1/04/2024 at 9:10 AM with Resident 42 revealed, that [gender] did not remember receiving a written bed hold policy prior to the transfer to the hospital on [DATE]. An interview on 1/04/2023 at 2:35 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed, [gender] was unable to locate the bed hold policy or a progress note stating that the bed hold policy had been given to Resident 42. The DON further revealed, that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow provider orders for daily weights for 1 (Resident 6) of 1 sampled resident. The facility identified a census of 48. Findings Are: The record review of the Order Summary ran on 1/4/24 revealed, Resident 6 had an order to obtain their daily weight in the morning related to Chronic Congestive Heart Failure. A record review of the daily weights for Resident 6 dated 11/27/23 thru 1/4/24 revealed: - 11/27/2023 at 9:30 AM the documented weight was 186.6 Lbs (pounds) - 11/28/2023 at 8:42 AM the documented weight was 187.2 Lbs - 11/29/2023 at 8:54 AM the documented weight was 188.0 Lbs - 11/30/2023 at 8:58 AM the documented weight was 189.0 Lbs - 12/1/2023 at 9:03 AM the documented weight was 188.0 Lbs - 12/2/2023 at 9:36 AM the documented weight was 185.8 Lbs - 12/3/2023 at 8:35 AM the documented weight was 185.0 Lbs - 12/4/2023 at 7:05 AM the documented weight was 186.8 Lbs - 12/5/2023 at 8:27 AM the documented weight was 187.4 Lbs - 12/6/2023 at 7:22 AM the documented weight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D4 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure interventions were followed to manage contractures for 1 (Resident 31) of 1 sampled residents. The facility census was 48. Findings are: A record review of Resident 31's demographic information revealed Resident 31 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of an Intracranial (brain) Injury with Loss of Consciousness. A record review of Resident 31's MDS (Minimum Data Set, a comprehensive assessment of each resident's physical and mental functional capabilities) dated 10/31/23 revealed Resident 31 had no BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status, a test used to get a quick snapshot of a resident's cognitive function, scored from 0-15, the higher the score, the higher the cognitive function) score due to being un-interviewable. A record review of Resident 31's Order Summary printed on 01/03/24 revealed Resident 31 had an order for their right hand to wash and dry with soap and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.17 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff donned (put on) and doffed (took off) the required PPE (personal protective equipement) when in a resident's room marked for transmission based precautions (TBP)(a resident that had or was exposed to COVID-19) to prevent the spread of COVID-19, ensure that the COVID-19 testing surface was sanitized (cleaned) to prevent the spread of COVID-19 and prevent cross contamination (spread of bacteria from one surface to another), ensure COVID-19 tests sat for 15 minutes before the result was read, ensure hand hygiene (cleaning) was completed between glove changes, and failed to ensure gloves, towels, and gauzes were changed between wound sites to prevent cross contamination. This had the potential to affect all 49 residents in the facility. The facility census was 49. Findings are: A. A record review of the facility's undated Transmission-Based (Isolation) Precautions policy revealed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-01-10 · tag F0582 — widespreadGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 (Residents 4 and 35) of 3 sampled resident's Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) had room and board listed and an estimated cost for the potential billed for services. The total facility census was 48. Findings are: A. A record review of the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Beneficiary Protection Notification Review sheet dated 02/2017 revealed Resident 4's start date for Medicare Part A skilled services was 06/13/2023, the last covered day of Part A services was 07/11/2023. The facility/provider initiated the discharge from Medicare Part A Services when benefit days were not exhausted. An ABN and Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) were completed. A record review of Resident 4's Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN) of Non-coverage dated 07/21/2023 revealed the care listed was: Skilled stay in a skilled nursing facility, The reason Medicare may not pay was: end of skilled therapy and skilled nursing monitoring, and the Estimated Cost was: share of cost. The SNF ABN did not reveal the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$25,642 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $9,805 — penalty dated 2024-06-17
- $15,837 — penalty dated 2023-12-12
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-05-25 for 16 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-02-19 for 26 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AVID HEALTHCARE GROUP — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 1.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 2.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOURO VALLEY INVESTMENT, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/02/2023 |
| NE 11 HOLDINGS OPCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/02/2023 |
| BRASS NE TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/02/2023 |
| BSD BEIS HEALTH TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/02/2023 |
| COPPER NE TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/02/2023 |
| GOLD NE TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/02/2023 |
| NE SNF HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/02/2023 |
| SF 4140 OLDE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD REAL PROPERTY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/01/2023 |
| SILVER NE TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/02/2023 |
| TULIP INVESTMENTS NE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/02/2023 |
| PIHLGREN, LINDSEY | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 08/02/2023 |
| SILBERSTEIN, ARI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 08/02/2023 |
10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $961K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 31% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NE
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nebraska Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 285143. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.