No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Adept Nursing & Rehab of Grand Island

800 Stoeger Drive, Grand Island, NE 68803 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 76 certified beds · (308) 382-5440 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0607, F0609) — most recent May 20251 immediate-jeopardy citation$16,801 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $16,801 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-01)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (76%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2116 W Faidley Ave Ste 400 · (308) 381-0162 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2620 Faidley Ave W · (308) 398-5694 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1602 2nd St W · (308) 382-6822 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2003 6th St W · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased25.5%19.0%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.3%5.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.2%1.4%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.5%2.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.0%4.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.3%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.3%4.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened26.5%18.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication29.4%19.3%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.0%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.6%4.0%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.7%25.9%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table35.9%20.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.5%2.0%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.3%75.9%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.6%20.7%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.2%11.4%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.911.811.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.221.921.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
48.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.16U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.05hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 48.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.0%CMS range 41.5–66.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 7.7–15.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge48.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge40.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge42.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified93.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened10.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.811.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.46
RN hours/ resident / day
0.39
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.00
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.86
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.46
RN hoursweekends
76.1%
Total nursing turnover
70.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 76 beds and averages 62.9 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.86 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.93 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 76% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

18
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-21)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-14)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to request emergency medical services promptly to provide emergency care services for 1 (Resident 1) of 1 sampled resident. This caused the resident to not receive timely emergency care services resulting in the death of the resident. The facility census was 45. Findings are: Record review of the undated facility policy titled Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) (a lifesaving attempt combination of rescue breathing and chest compressions when someone's heart has stopped) revealed that it is the policy of the facility to adhere to resident rights to formulate advanced directives. The facility will implement guidelines regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The facility will follow current American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines regarding CPR. If a resident experiences a cardiac arrest the facility staff will provide basic life support including CPR prior to the arrival of emergency medical services. Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-21 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(A)(iii)(2)(a) Based on observation, record review, and interview; the facility failed to ensure that Nurse Aide Registry Checks (a state required record of a successful completion of training and competency to be a nurse aide and any findings of abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of property) were completed prior to hire as required for 4 of 5 sampled staff. This had the potential for residents to be cared for by staff with adverse findings related to abuse or neglect. The facility census was 58. Findings are: Record review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation dated 1/14/25 revealed that it is the policy of the facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property. Potential employees will be screened for a history of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property. Background, reference, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-21 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure that the Daily Nurse Staff posting was posted as required. This had the potential to affect all residents residing within the facility. The facility census was 58. Findings are: Record review of the facility policy titled Nurse Staffing Posting Information dated 2/5/25 revealed that it is the facility policy to make nurse staffing information readily available in a readable format to residents, staff, and visitors at any given time. The Nurse Staffing Sheet will be posted on a daily basis and will contain the following information: Facility name; the current date; current resident census; the total number and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift-Registered Nurses, Licensed Practical Nurses, and Nurse Aides. The policy also revealed that the facility will post the Nurse Staffing Sheet at the beginning of each shift. The information posted will be in a prominent place readily accessible to residents,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.12(E)(1) Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure stock medication bottles were labeled with the date indicating when they bottle was opened or should be discarded for 2 (Residents 17 and 23) of 3 sampled residents and the facility failed to store medication in a sanitary manner which had the potential to affect all the residents receiving medications from the facility. The facility census was 58. Findings are: A. A record review of a facility policy titled Labeling of Medications and Biologicals dated 2025 revealed labels for stock medications must include the original manufacturer's or pharmacy applied label and the expiration date. In an observation of medication administration on 05/19/2025 from 8:15 AM to 9:15 AM by Medication Aide (MA)-B the following was observed: -MA-B removed a white bottle with purple lid from the medication cart. The MA emptied white powder into the purple lid then poured the white powder into a clear 8 ounce cup. The MA then placed the cap back on the bottle and placed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-21 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review; the facility failed to review and revise the Facility Assessment as needed to assure the facility had the resources to meet the needs of 1 (Resident 26) of 1 sampled resident. The facility census was 58. Findings are: Record review of the Facility Assessment received from the facility on 05/21/2025 revealed a revision date of 04/15/2025 and a review date with the Quality Assurance (QA) committee on 04/16/2025 revealed the following: -The Facility Assessment included all residents within their population, however, did not include ventilation services. Record review of Resident 26 physician orders dated May 2025 revealed an order: -Trilogy Non-invasive ventilator - Resident to wear at bedtime or napping; Not to be worn 24 hours per day, resident to be up in chair as needed for while napping; order date 11/27/2024 An interview on 05/18/2025 at 8:30 AM with Resident 26 reported use of the Trilogy Non-invasive ventilator 24 hours a day 7 days a week and only takes off when the hoses are cleaned and/or changed. An interview on 05/20/2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.04(A)(ii) Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.17 Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.17D Based on observations, record review, and inteviews; the facility failed to ensure that the pre-employment health history screening (a medical evaluation conducted on prospective employees before they start working to identify any infectious disease or health risks) was completed as required for 1 of 5 sampled staff; the facility failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions when providing high contact resident care for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 17 and 41); and failed to perform hand hygiene during wound care for 1 of 1 residents (Resident 41). The facility census was 58. Findings are: A. Record review of the facility policy titled Pre-Employment Health Assessment Policy dated 8/1/23 revealed that the purpose is to ensure that all new employees are medically fit to perform the duties of their role safely and without risk to themselves, residents, or colleagues. The policy supports a safe, healthy, and compliant work environment in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-21 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — widespread
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(B) Based on record reviews, and interviews; the facility failed to trained staff on Trilogy Non-invasice ventilator. This had the potential to affect 1 (Resident 26) of 1 sampled resident in the facility. The facility census was 58. Record review of the Facility Assessment received from the facility on 05/21/2025 revealed a revision date of 04/15/2025 and a review date with the Quality Assurance (QA) committee on 04/16/2025. Record review of the Facility Assessment included all residents within their population, however, did not include ventilation services. Record review of Resident 26 physician orders dated May 2025 revealed an order: -Trilogy Non-invasive ventilator - Resident to wear at bedtime or napping; Not to be worn 24 hours per day, resident to be up in chair as needed for while napping; order date 11/27/2024 An interview on 05/18/2025 at 8:30 AM with Resident 26 reported use of the Trilogy Non-invasive ventilator 24 hours a day 7 days a week and only takes off when the hoses are cleaned and/or changed. An interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-21 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.04(B)(ii)(1) Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure that nurse aides completed a minimum of 12 hours of continuing education annually as required for 2 of 5 sampled staff. This had the potential to prevent residents from receiving competent care. The facility census was 58. Findings are: A. Record review of the facility policy titled Nurse Aide Training Program dated 1/14/25 revealed that the facility maintains an appropriate and effective nurse aide in-service training program for the purpose of ensuring the continuing competence of nurse aides. Each nurse aide shall be provided at least 12 hours of in-service training annually based on his/her employment date, not calendar year. Minimum training will include dementia management and care of the cognitively impaired; abuse, neglect, and exploitation prevention; resident rights and facility responsibilities; facility infection prevention and control program; safety and emergency procedures; behavioral health; and identification of changes in condition. Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY C. Record review of the admission Record dated 5/20/25 for Resident 9 revealed that Resident 9 admitted into the facility on 4/1/25 with diagnoses of schizophrenia (a serious mental illness in which people interpret reality abnormally), anxiety, and major depression. Record review of the Order Summary Report (a concise listing of physician ordered treatments and medications) dated 5/19/25 for Resident 9 revealed an active order for Paliperidone (an antipsychotic medication used to treat schizophrenia ) with a start date of 4/2/25; Quetiapine (an atypical antipsychotic medication used to treat a range of mental health conditions) with a start date of 4/1/25; and Vraylar (an atypical antipsychotic medication used to treat several mental health conditions) with a start date of 4/2/25. Record review of the Care Plan dated 5/18/25 for Resident 9 revealed that Resident 9 uses psychotropic medications, antidepressants, and antipsychotics related to Schizophrenia. Record review of the MDS dated [DATE] for Resident 9…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.05(E) Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident wishes in regard to code status was accurately reflected in the resident's electronic medical health record for 1 resident, Resident 23 of 23 sampled residents. The facility census was 58. Findings are: A review of a facility policy titled 'Communication of Code Status and dated [DATE] revealed it is the facilities policy to adhere to the resident's rights to formulate advanced directives and to implement procedures to communicate a resident's code status. The designated sections of the medical record where a resident's code status will be documented include order entry, profile header, and care plan. A review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident 23 on [DATE] with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (a brain dysfunction caused by and underlying metabolic disorder or systemic illness, resulting in changes in mental status), obesity ( a chronic disease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(D) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications had approved indications for use for 2 (Residents 7 and 54) of 5 sampled residents. The facility census was 58. Findings are: A record review of the facility policy titled Use of Psychotropic Medications dated 02/05/2025 revealed that psychotropic medications are to be used only when a practitioner determines that the medication is appropriate to treat a resident's specific, diagnosed, and documented condition. A. A record review of a document titled Quetiapine (an antipsychotic/psychotropic medication medication) by the National Library of Medicine dated 08/28/2023 revealed Quetiapine is Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for use in indications of schizophrenia, acute manic episodes, and adjunctive treatment for major depressive disorder. A record review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 8 on 05/24/2021 with diagnoses of hemiplegia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 21 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(H) Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to report and submit an investigation for an injury of unknown origin to the State Agency and adult protective services within the required time frames for 1 (Resident 8) of 1 sampled resident. The facility census was 58. Findings are: A record review of a facility supplied policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation and dated 01/14/2025 revealed the facility will report all alleged violations to the administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies within specified time frames. Immediately, but not later then 2 hours after the allegation is made if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury. A record review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident 8 on 05/24/2021 with diagnoses of hemiplegia (total or partial paralysis on one side of the body…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(D) Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems), for 1 (Resident 41) of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 58. Findings are: A record review of a facility policy titled MDS 3.0 Completion revealed under the section Coding of Assessments, all disciplines shall follow the guidelines in Chapter 3 of the current Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual (RAI Manual, a document published by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to facilitate accurate and effective resident assessment practices in long-term care facilities) for coding of each assessment. A record review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident 41 on 12/07/2023 with diagnoses of absence of left leg below the knee,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(A)(i) Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Nebraska Level 1 Form (an initial pre-screening for mental illness and intellectual/developmental disabilities prior to admission) screening was completed prior to resident admission into the facility for 1 (Resident 9) of 1 sampled residents. The facility census was 58. Findings are: Record review of the facility policy titled Coordination with PASARR Program dated 1/14/25 revealed that the facility coordinates with the preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) program under Medicaid to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition receives care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs. All applicants to this facility will be screened for serious mental disorders or intellectual disabilities in accordance with the State's Medicaid rules for screening. PASARR Level 1 is an initial pre-screening that is completed prior to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure bowel care services were provided for 3 residents (Residents 8, 54, and 26) of 5 sampled residents. The facility census was 58. Findings are: A. A record review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident 8 on 05/24/2021 with diagnoses of hemiplegia (total or partial paralysis on one side of the body that results from disease or injury to the motor centers of the brain) of the left side, type 2 diabetes mellitus (a common form of diabetes mellitus that develops especially in adults and most often in obese individuals and that is characterized by hyperglycemia resulting from impaired insulin utilization coupled with the body's inability to compensate with increased insulin production), dementia (a usually progressive condition marked by the development of multiple cognitive deficits (such as memory impairment, aphasia, and the inability to plan and initiate complex behavior), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(v) Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident 41) of 1 sampled resident maintained their range of motion (full movement potential of a joint) to promote the resident's highest practicable level of independence. The facility census was 58. Findings are: A record review of a facility policy titled Prevention of Decline in Range of Motion dated 2024 revealed residents who enter the facility without limited range of motion will not experience a reduction in range of motion unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrated that a reduction in range of motion is unavoidable. A record review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident 41 on 12/07/2023 with diagnoses of absence of left leg below the knee, chronic pain, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a common form of diabetes mellitus that develops especially in adults and most often in obese individuals and that is characterized by hyperglycemia resulting from impaired insulin utilization coupled with the body's inability to compensate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.08(B)(i) Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure that the physician completed the initial post-admission visit (30 day visit) for 2 of 4 residents reviewed (Residents 38 and 25). The facility census was 58. Findings are: A. Record review of the facility policy titled Physician Visits and Physician Delegation dated 4/1/24 revealed that it is the policy of the facility to ensure that the physician takes an active role in supervising the care of residents. The physician should see the resident within 30 days of initial admission to the facility. The resident must be seen at least once every 30 calendar days for the first 90 calendar days after admission. Required visits after the initial visit may alternate between personal visits by the physician and visits by a physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist under the supervision of a physician. The section titled Authority for Non-Physician Practitioners to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.14 Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to promptly provide and obtain dental services for 1 (Resident 41) of 4 sampled residents. The facility census was 58. Findings are: In an interview completed on 05/18/2025 at 11:50 PM with Resident 41, Resident 41 stated they had multiple broken teeth. The resident denied seeing a dentist since being admitted to the facility in 2023. The resident voiced discomfort to mouth/teeth only when chewing tough or hard items and would like to see the dentist. Resident stated they had not been asked about needing or wanting to see the dentist. In an observation completed on 05/18/2025 at 11:55 PM of Resident 41's teeth, it was observed on the lower left side of the resident's mouth, their back teeth had holes present to the top of 2 of the teeth. A record review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident 41 on 12/07/2023 with diagnoses of absence of left leg below the knee, chronic pain, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a common form of diabetes mellitus that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.0911(A) Based on observation, record reviews, and interviews; the facility failed to ensure 1 resident, (Resident 52) of 1 sampled resident received diet and preferences as requested. The facility census was 58. Findings are: An observation on 05/20/2025 at 1:10 PM, Resident 52 sat in their room in front of a meal provided by the kitchen. During an interview on 05/20/2025 at 1:10 PM, Resident 52 reported wanting to go to the bank to get money to buy their own food. Resident 52 further revealed they cannot eat the food; the hot dog has pork in it. A record review of a meal ticket on 05/20/2025 for Resident 52 revealed: Diet: Renal (A renal diet is one that is low in sodium, phosphorous and protein; a diet that cuts down on the amount of waste in their blood) Texture: Regular Diet/Other: No Added Salt (NAS), No Pork or Pork by Products Fluid Restriction: 1500 Beverages: Fluid Restriction: 8 oz fruit drink Menu: Roasted Pork Loin Buttered Noodles Broccoli & Cauliflower Diced Peaches Dinner Roll/2 teaspoon (tsp) margarine Beverage Other Menu…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-0006.09(H)(iii)(1) Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.09(H)(iii)(2) Based on observation, record review, and interview; the facility failed to provide care and services to prevent pressure related skin conditions and promote the healing of pressure related skin conditions for 1 resident (Resident #1) of 3 sampled residents. The facility census was 50. Review of the facility policy titled Skin Assessment and not dated revealed that a full body, or head to toe, skin assessment will be conducted by a licensed or registered nurse upon admission/re-admission, daily for three days, and weekly there after. The section labeled documentation of skin assessment stated documentation should include date and time of assessment observations, type of wound, description of wound, and if the resident refused the assessment and why. Review of the facility policy titled Pressure Injury Prevention Guidelines and dated 01/05/2024 revealed that individualized interventions will address specific factors identified including nutritional deficit and impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.17B Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.17C Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.17D Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.04A2a Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that staff followed requirements for wearing and discarding of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) (specialized equipment worn by an employee for protection against infectious disease) in resident rooms for residents with Covid-19 infection and for residents requiring Enhanced Barrier Precautions (use of PPE to reduce transmission of multi-drug resistant germs that employs targeted gown and glove use during contact with a resident) to prevent the potential for Covid-19 and cross contamination. This had the potential to affect all facility residents; The facility failed to ensure a pre-employment health history screening was completed and reviewed to prevent the potential for transmissible disease for 5 of 5 sampled facility staff which had the potential…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.18B3 Based on observations and interview the facility staff failed to ensure 3 of 27 rooms were maintained in good repair and failed to maintain wallpaper and walls in good repair in 2 of 3 halls in good repair. The facility census was 37. Findings are: The following was observed during a facility environmental tour on 05/14/2025 from 2:00 PM till 2:44 PM with the Facility Administrator (FA). -room [ROOM NUMBER] square hole in ceiling exposing under layment, warped rippling paint on the wall near the hole in the ceiling and above the window in the room, yellow brown staining around the hole in the ceiling, gray black fuzzy material along the wall to ceiling trim in this area, ceiling material cracked and protruding down. Gray black fuzzy material on the inside white portion of the curtain hanging in the room over the window. Outside of room above the window a large hole in the roof soffit. -room [ROOM NUMBER] paint on wall is pealing and warped, yellow brown staining to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.09C(2) Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.09C(5) Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.09C2 Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan (a written plan detailing how staff are to meet the resident's needs) included interventions to meet resident needs related to urinary elimination for 1 resident (Resident 39 and failed to include a discharge plan for 1 resident (Resident 1) of 12 total sampled residents. The facility census was 37. Findings are: A. Record review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans dated 8/1/23 revealed that it is the facility policy to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment (a required resident assessment tool used for care planning that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.09C1c Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure care plan meetings were completed to allow residents/resident representatives to participate in development and revision of the resident's plan of care (a written interdisciplinary comprehensive plan detailing how to provide quality care for a resident) for 5 of 12 sampled residents (Residents 11, 18, 14, 1, and 25). The facility census was 37. Findings are: A. Record review of the facility policy titled Care Planning-Resident Participation dated 8/1/24 revealed the facility supports the resident's right to be informed of, and participate in, his or her care planning and treatment (implementation of care). The care planning process will include an assessment of the resident's strengths and needs, and will incorporate the resident's personal and cultural preferences in developing goals of care. The facility will honor the resident's choice in individuals to be included in the care planning process.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.10D Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure 4 (Residents #19, #11, #193, and #21) of 13 residents were free of significant medication errors for. The facility census was 37. Findings are: A. Review of a facility policy titled, Insulin, which is a medication administered by injection to help regulate blood sugar levels, Pen, dated 08/01/2024 revealed item #6, Insulin pens will be primed prior to each use to avoid collection of air in the insulin reservoir. Item #11 section H titled Prime the insulin pen: dial 2 units by turning the dose selector clockwise. With the needle pointing up, push the plunger, and watch to see that at least one drop of insulin appears on the tip of the needle. Section I set the insulin dose. Review of a document labeled Instructions for Use dated 07/2023 revealed, step #6 to prime your pen, turn the dose knob to select 2 units. Hold your pen with the needle pointing up tap the cartridge holder gently to collect air bubbles at the top, continue holding your pen with needle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.09D3(5) Based on record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure routine bowel movements for 1, (Resident #19) of 4 sampled residents. The facility census was 37. Findings are: Review of a facility document labeled Constipation Prevention dated 08/01/2023 revealed an as needed laxative, which is a medication administered to promote bowel movements, will be offered during the third day without a bowel movement. A suppository will be offered the morning of the fourth day without a bowel movement. If a resident does not have a bowel movement after an as needed laxative and a suppository is provided, and assessment of the abdomen, bowel sounds, pain and appetite will be completed. The primary physician will be notified. A review of an admission Record dated 5/14/24 indicated the facility admitted Resident #19 on 04/20/2024 with diagnoses of Schizophrenia which is severe mental health disorder that can result in hallucinations, delusions, and extremely disorder thinking and behavior that interfere with daily life, compression fracture…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D Based on record review and interviews; the facility staff failed to manage complaints of pain for 1 (Resident 192) of 2 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 37. Findings are: Record review of the admission Record dated 5/14/24 for Resident 192 revealed that Resident 192 admitted into the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of the following: -Closed left subtrochanteric femur fracture (break in thigh bone) -Pelvic fracture (to the hip bones, sacrum, or coccyx) -Diabetes mellitus (a disease in which the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired) -Obesity (abnormal or excessive fat accumulation that presents a risk to health) -Hyperlipidemia (abnormally high concentration of fats in the blood) -Hypertension (pressure in the blood vessels are too high) -COPD (condition involving constriction of the airways in breathing) -Chief Complaint: PAIN Record review of Resident 192's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-16 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY G. Record Review of the Administrative admission Packet, dated 3/2/23, revealed Resident 27 was admitted to facility on 3/2/23. Record review of nursing notes dated 3/16/23 at 5:20 PM revealed Resident 27 was sent to ER. Record review of a nursing note dated 3/17/23 at 1:03 PM revealed that Resident 27 returned to the facility. Record review of Resident 27's medical record revealed no documentation that the Ombudsman was notified of Resident 27's transfer to the hospital. Record Review of MDS (Minimum Data Set- an assessment that gives a summary of resident's health and condition) dated 3/16/23 revealed that resident discharged with return anticipated H. Record review of Resident 27's Nursing note dated 3/28/23 revealed that the resident was sent to the hospital on 3/27/23 following a follow up appointment with the Primary Care Provider for Resident 27. Record review of Nursing note for Resident 27 dated 3/31/23 revealed that resident was assessed in facility. Record review of MDS dated [DATE] revealed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-16 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that a required written bed hold notification (written information outlining options for holding or reserving a resident's bed while the resident is absent from the facility for hospitalization) was provided to the resident/resident representative at the time of transfer for 5 residents (Residents 16, 28, 36, 18, and 27). This prevented the resident/resident representative from making an informed decision to either request a bed hold (a reservation that allows a resident to return to the facility) or release the resident bed. The facility census was 37. Findings are: A. Record review of Resident 16's Discharge Return Anticipated MDS (Minimum Data Set-a comprehensive assessment used to develop a resident's care plan) revealed Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged to the hospital on 4/16/2023. Review of Resident 16's Progress Notes dated 4/11/2023 to 5/11/2023 revealed documentation Resident 16 was transferred to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.11E Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to maintain the ice and water dispenser machine to prevent the potential for foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect 33 residents who received thin liquids; and the facility failed to ensure that dietary staff handled dishware to prevent the potential for cross contamination and foodborne illness for 4 residents (Residents 140, 1, 21, and 36). The facility census was 37. Findings are: A. Observation of the facility dining room on 5/10/23 at 8:19 AM revealed an ice and water dispenser machine was sitting on the counter in the dining room. There was white, gray, and brown material on the outside of the machine, on the ice dispenser nozzle, and on the grate over the drain. At 12:10 PM an unidentified staff member filled a glass of ice water out of the machine in the dining room then gave it to Resident 23 who then proceeded to drink it. Observation of the ice and water dispenser machine in the dining room on 5/11/23 at 3:30 PM with the VPCS (Vice President of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09D7a Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain equipment to prevent a potential accident hazard for 1 of 6 sampled residents, Resident 5. The facility identified a census of 37 at the time of survey. Findings are: Review of Resident 5's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set-a comprehensive assessment used to develop a resident's care plan) dated 4/9/2023 revealed an admission date of 7/7/2021. Resident 5 was independent with bed mobility, transfers, and walking in the room and required limited assistance from 1 staff person for toilet use. Observation of Resident 5's bathroom on 05/10/23 at 10:47 AM revealed the toilet riser was not secured to the toilet. The toilet riser sat down in the toilet bowl and was loose and could easily be moved with light pressure of the hand which created a potential accident hazard in the event the toilet riser would become ajar while the resident was sitting on it causing the resident to fall off the toilet. Observation of Resident 5's bathroom on 5/10/2023 at 4:01 PM with the facility DON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.11D Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to maintain food temperatures to preserve palatability and prevent the potential for foodborne illness. This affected 1 of 1 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 37 at the time of survey. Findings are: Interview with Resident 36 on 05/10/23 at 10:08 AM revealed they ate their meals in their room. Resident 36 revealed the hot food was often cold when they received it and they were at the end of the hall and were the last one served. Observation on 5/15/23 at 12:28 PM revealed that the noon meal test tray was provided by DC-D (Dietary Cook). The diced carrots on the plate had a temperature of 149.7 F (Fahrenheit). The fried potatoes (potatoes that were cut in thick slices with some end pieces of potatoes that were in chunks) had a temperature of 119.1 F. The smothered chicken (a flat piece of whole meat chicken breast with a clear sauce on it) had a temperature of 129.2 F. Taste test of the chicken revealed it had a grainy consistency and tasted luke…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$16,801 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-02-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVID HEALTHCARE GROUP — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
NE 11 HOLDINGS OPCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 08/02/2023
BRASS NE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
BSD BEIS HEALTH TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
COPPER NE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
DOURO VALLEY INVESTMENT, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
GOLD NE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
NE SNF HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
SF 4140 OLDE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD REAL PROPERTY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/01/2023
SILVER NE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
TULIP INVESTMENTS NE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
MUIR, DANIELLEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 08/02/2023
SILBERSTEIN, ARIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/02/2023

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$2.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-13.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$207K
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 72%Medicare 12%Other / private 16%

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $207K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$376per resident / day
operating cost
$11,438per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$331per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NE

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nebraska Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Nebraska
$8,377/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,350/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 285221. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next