No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Adept Nursing & Rehab of Gretna

700 Highway 6, Gretna, NE 68028 · For profit - Corporation · 63 certified beds · (402) 332-3446 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (402) 332-3446 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited Mar 20261 actual-harm citation1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (24) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (87%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
11946 Standing Stone Dr · (402) 815-4500 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
611 N Highway 6 · (402) 332-5990 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
604 S Highway 6 · (402) 332-4429 · Call to confirm hours
Park
201 Cherokee Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.9%19.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.2%5.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder3.3%1.4%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms13.2%4.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained1.8%0.3%0.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.2%4.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.5%18.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.1%19.3%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.8%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.0%4.0%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.2%25.9%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table21.9%20.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication6.2%2.0%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine75.0%75.9%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.4%20.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.5%11.4%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.861.811.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.471.921.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 56 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
42.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.54U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.20hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.24hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 42.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.54 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.1%CMS range 43.8–63.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 7.4–14.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge42.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge42.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge33.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened11.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.7%CMS range 4.9–15.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.171.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.44
RN hours/ resident / day
0.75
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.85
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.04
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.31
RN hoursweekends
87.1%
Total nursing turnover
83.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 63 beds and averages 41.8 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.04 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.85 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.22 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 87% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-05)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-16)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iii)(1) and 12-006.09(H)(iii)(2) Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to evaluate, monitor and implement interventions for pressure ulcer prevention and to promote wound healing for 2 (Resident 2 and 3) of 3 residents sampled. The facility census was 43. The findings are: A.Record review of Resident 2' Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 03-27-2025 revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident: -an admission date of 03-24-2025 -had a right hip fracture. -Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was scored as a 15. According to the MDS Manual a score of 13-15 indicates a person is cognitively intact. -Required extensive assistance with toileting, lower body dressing and bathing. -Required partial assistance with bed mobility, transfers, upper body dressing and personal hygiene. -Resident was at risk of developing pressure ulcers. -Required pressure relieving…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(vi)(3)(g). The facility failed to obtain settings and ensure tubing and mask was changed for the use of a noninvasive ventilator for 1 (Resident 3) of 1 residents sampled, failed to monitor oxygen saturations to ensure oxygen blood levels were maintained for 1 (Resident 1) of 4 residents sampled and failed to ensure oxygen tubing was dated for 2 (Residents 2 and 42) of 4 residents sampled. The facility census was 40. The findings are: A.Record review of the facility's undated policy titled Noninvasive Ventilation (CPAP, BiPAP, AVAPS, Trilogy) revealed it is the policy of this facility to provide noninvasive ventilation as per physician's orders and current standards of practice. The facility will obtain an order for the use of CPAP, BiPap, AVAPS, or Trilogy device and settings from the practitioner. The facility will replace equipment routinely in accordance with manufacturer recommendations. General guidelines for face mask and tubing changes was once every 3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10(D). Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of 5% or less as evidenced by 3 errors out of 25 opportunities for error resulting in a medication error rate of 12%. The facility census was 40. The findings are:Record review of the facility's undated policy titled Medication Errors revealed it is the policy of the facility to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by ensuring residents receive care and services safely in an environment free of significant medication errors.Medication error means the observed or identified preparation or administration of medications or biologicals which were not in accordance with the prescriber's order; manufacturer's specifications regarding preparation and administration of medication or biological; or accepted professional standards and principles which apply to professionals providing services. The facility shall ensure medications will be administered as follows:-according to physician's orders-per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to update advanced directives in the medical record for 1 (Resident 1) of 17 residents sampled. The facility census was 40. The findings are:Record review of the facility policy dated 10-01-2022 titled Communication of Code Status revealed it is the policy of the facility to adhere to residents' rights to formulate advance directives. In accordance to these rights, this facility will implement procedures to communicate a resident's code status to those individuals who need to know this information. The facility will follow facility policy regarding resident's right to request, refuse and/or discontinue medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an Advance Directive. When an order is written pertaining to a resident's presence or absence of an Advance Directive, the directions will be clearly documented in designated sections of the medical record. Examples of directions to be documented include: Full Code, Do Not Resuscitate, Do Not Intubate and Do Not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(G)Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to identify and monitor specific target behaviors and side effects for the use of psychotropic medications for Residents 42 and 43 and failed to ensure AIMS testing had been completed for Resident 6 and failed to monitor and evaluate sleep patterns for the continued use of hypnotic medications for 3. A total of 5 residents were reviewed for unnecessary medication use. The census was 40. Findings are:A. Record review of a facility policy (undated) entitled Use of Psychotropic medication revealed the following information: It is the intent of this policy to ensure that residents receive psychotropic medications when nonpharmacological interventions are clinically contraindicated. Additionally, these medications should only be used to treat the residents' medical symptoms. Definitions: Adverse Consequences is a broad term referring to unwanted, unintended, or dangerous effects that a drug may have, such a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(F0(iii) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to review and revise the Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP, a document that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet residents medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment) to ensure the correct advanced directive information was identified for 1(Resident 8) of 1 resident reviewed for Hospice. The facility census was 40. Findings are: Record review of Resident 8's admission Face Sheet revealed an original admission date of 06/08/2023 and the Clinical Census identified a re-admission to Medicaid Hospice Services on 2/19/26. Record review of Resident 8's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems) dated 2/27/26 revealed that Resident 8 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) score of 14…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement a fluid restriction for 1(Resident 28) of 2 residents sampled. The facility census was 40. The findings are:Record review of the facility's undated policy titled Fluid Restriction revealed fluid restrictions may be ordered by a qualified professional (Physician, Nurse Practitioner, or when delegated to the Registered Dietician) as a part of a fluid management program for residents with edema, heart failure or dialysis. The amount of fluid allowed per 24 hours is written as a Physician's order using the approved community process. The fluid restriction order is sent to dining services in writing via the designated diet order form. Responsibility for dividing and communicating the allowed milliliters (ml) of fluids between Dining Services and Nursing Services per 24 hours is facilitated by the Dining Manager. Record review of Resident 28's Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) revealed the facility staff assessed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iii)(2). Based on interview and record review the facility failed to obtain orders for treatment of a pressure ulcer for 1(Resident 51) of 2 residents sampled. The facility census was 40. The findings are:Record review of the facility policy dated 08-2025 titled Wound Treatment Management revealed the policy was to promote wound healing of various types of wounds, it is the policy of the facility to provide evidence-based treatments in accordance with the current standards of practice and physician orders. Wound treatments will be provided in accordance with physician orders, including the cleansing method, type of dressing, and frequency of dressing change. In the absence of treatment orders, the licensed nurse will notify the physician to obtain treatment orders. Record review of Resident 51's Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident:-admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.12(vi)Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a rationale was provided for the continued use of ibuprofen for Resident 43. The facility identified a census of 40.Findings are:A.A Record review of a Policy entitled Medication Regimen Review dated 8/3/25 and revised 8/3/25 revealedPolicy:The drug regimen of each resident is reviewed at least once a month by a licensed pharmacist and included a review of the resident's medical chart.4. The pharmacist shall document, either manually or electronically, that each medication review has been completed. a. The pharmacist shall document either that no irregularity was identified or the nature of any identified irregularities. b. The pharmacist does not need to document continuing irregularity in the report each month if the attending physician has documented a valid clinical rationale for rejecting the pharmacist's recommendations. B.A record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS , a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-08-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.11(E) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the chemical low-temperature (temp) dish machine reached a minimum temp of 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F)(a temperature scale) during all wash and rinse cycles. This had the potential to affect 43 residents that consumed food from the kitchen. The total facility census was 44. Findings are:A record review of the facility's Dishwasher Temperature policy dated 8/2023 revealed all items cleaned in the dishwasher would be washed in water that is sufficient to sanitize any and all items. Manufacturer's instructions shall be followed for washing and sanitizing. The wash temp shall be 120 degrees F. Water temperatures shall be measured and recorded prior to each meal.A record review of the facility's undated Dishwashing: Machine Operation Guideline and (&) Procedure Manual revealed all dishwashing machines should be operated according to the manufacturer's recommendation. The staff should check the dishwashing machine first and if the unit has not been used for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(I)Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 1-009.04(D)(i)(1)Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure bathing and showering water temperatures (temps) did not exceed 110 degrees Fahrenheit (F)(a temperature unite of measure) to prevent potential accidents. The facility census was 44.Findings are:A record review of the facility's Resident Showers policy with a date reviewed/revised of 7/2025 revealed the staff should help the resident sit on the shower chair, turn the shower on, the water temperature should be 98.6 degrees F to 120 degrees F. They could use a thermometer if one was available or test the water on the inside of the staff's wrist. A record review of the facility's Safe Water Temperatures policy with a date reviewed/revised of 7/2025 revealed water temperature should be set at no 98.6 degrees F to 120 degrees F or the state's allowable maximum water temperature. The Maintenance staff would check water heater temperature controls and the temps of tap water in all hot water circuits weekly and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 13 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iii)(1 & 2)Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to evaluate causal factors and failed to implement interventions to prevent pressure wounds for 1 (Resident 3) of 4 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 44.The findings are:Record review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and help nursing home staff identify health problems) dated 7/1/2025 revealed the facility staff identified the following about the resident: -Resident 3 was rarely or never understood and had short and long-term memory problems. -Resident 3 did not exhibit behaviors. -Resident 3 was dependent upon staff for all cares including bed mobility, transfers, hygiene, and toileting. -Resident 3 had a gastrostomy tube (g-tube, a flexible tube passed into the stomach for introducing fluids and liquid food into the stomach) and that Resident 3 received 51% or more of calories through and 501 milliliters (mL) per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER175 NAC 1-005.06 (D & E)LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER175 NAC 12-006.18 (B & D)Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to utilize a gown during personal cares for a resident who was identified as being in Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in nursing homes. EBP involve gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities for residents known to be colonized or infected with a MDRO as well as those at increased risk of MDRO acquisition [e.g., residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices]) for 1 (Resident 4) of 3 sampled residents; and the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene between glove changes to prevent cross contamination for 1 (Resident 4) of 5 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 44.The findings are: A. Record review of a facility policy entitled Enhanced Barrier Precautions dated revised 5/31/2025 revealed: -EBP refers to an infection control intervention…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(F)(i)(5) Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide bathing services in accordance with the resident's preferences for 4 (Resident 1, 2, 3 and 5) of 4 residents sampled. The facility census was 43. The findings are: A.Record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 01-30-2025 revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident: -Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was scored as a 6. According to the MDS Manual a score of 0-7 indicates severe cognitive impairment. -Required moderate assistance with upper body dressing, bed mobility, and personal hygiene. -Required total assistance with lower body dressing, toileting, bathing, and transfers. Record review of a form titled Bath Preferences dated 01-28-2025 revealed Resident 1 wanted a bath twice a week. Record review of the facility documentation for baths in March and April of 2025 revealed Resident 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(E). Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to notify the medical practitioner of new pressure ulcers for 2 (Resident 2 and 3) of 3 residents sampled. The facility census was 43. The findings are: A.Record review of Resident 2' Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 03-27-2025 revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident: -Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was scored as a 15. According to the MDS Manual a score of 13-15 indicates a person is cognitively intact. -Required extensive assistance with toileting, lower body dressing and bathing. -Required partial assistance with bed mobility, transfers, upper body dressing and personal hygiene. Record review of Resident 2's progress notes dated 04-02-2025 revealed an unmeasured skin issue was identified to the left heel and the staff called the practitioner and obtained a one-time order to wash the left heel with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-16 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing information was posted daily at the beginning of the shift and included the facility name, date, census, and the total number and actual hours worked per shift for Registered Nurses, Licensed Practical Nurses, and Nurses Aides who were responsible for resident care. This had the potential to affect all residents that resided in the facility. The facility census was 44. Findings are: Record review of a policy entitled Nurse Staffing Posting Information, dated 8-2023, revealed the following information: It is the policy of this facility to make nurse staffing information readily available in a readable format to residents and visitors at any given time policy explanation and compliance guidelines: 1. The nurse staffing sheet will be posted on a daily basis and will contain the following information: a: Facility name b: The current date c: Facilities current resident census d: The total number and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the cleanliness and condition of walls, floors, fixtures, closet doors, lights, bathroom ceiling ventilation covers in 9 resident rooms (rooms 104, 106, 112, 116, 203, 204, 206, 210 and 212) of 33 occupied resident rooms in the facility. The facility census was 44. Findings are: Observation on 10/9/24 between 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM, during the initial pool observations of resident rooms, revealed the following environmental concerns: - Scrapes on walls behind the beds and on the walls in bathrooms in rooms 104, 106, 112, and 204. - [NAME] stained areas of the floor around the toilet base in rooms 106, 112, 203, and 206. - Scrapes on the closet doors in room [ROOM NUMBER]. - Cracked bathroom sink in rooms 104. - Closet door was pulled off of the track in room [ROOM NUMBER]. - Cracks in the linoleum in bathroom in room [ROOM NUMBER]. - Missing / loose transition strip between the bathroom and room [ROOM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.12E Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to secure residents medications and treatments in medication carts. The facility identified a census of 43. Findings are: Record review of the facility's undated policy titled Medication Storage revealed the following: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to ensure all medications housed on our premises will be stored in the pharmacy and/or medication rooms according to the manufacturer's recommendations and sufficient to ensure proper sanitation, temperature, light, ventilation, moisture control, segregation, and security. Policy explanation and compliance guidelines: General Guidelines: All drugs and biologicals will be stored in locked compartments (i.e., medication carts, cabinets, drawers, refrigerators, medication rooms) under proper temperatures. Observation on 5/1/24 at 6:52 AM revealed a medication cart next to an office that was unlocked and unattended. Continued observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D2a Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to obtain treatment orders for pressure ulcers for 2 (Resident 1 and Resident 3) of 3 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 43. Findings are: A. Record review of Resident 1's Clinical Census sheet dated 5/1/24 revealed Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility 2/7/24, was hospitalized and readmitted to the facility 4/26/24. Record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated March 28th, 2024, revealed Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was 2 of 15. According to the MDS Manual a score of 0-7 indicates a person is severely cognitively impaired. Record review of Resident 1's After Visit Summary sheet dated 4/26/24 revealed Resident 1 had returned to the facility on 4/26/24 with a pressure ulcer on the left lateral foot. Record review on 5/1/24 of Resident 1's medical record that includes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure reference: 175 NAC 12-006.09D8a Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered therapeutic diet was provided for 1 [Resident 1] of 4 sampled residents. The facility had a total census of 44 residents. Findings are: A review of Resident 1's admission Record revealed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy [a type of nerve damage that can occur with diabetes]. A review of Resident 1's Order Summary with active orders as of 1/29/24 revealed an order dated 1/8/24 for a Modified Renal CCHO [Consistent Carbohydrate] with regular texture and thin consistency liquids. Observations on 1/29/24 at 8:16 AM revealed a breakfast tray being delivered to Resident 1 with the following breakfast items, scrambled eggs, tater tots, toast, milk, coffee, and a bowl of frosted flakes. Further observation on 1/29/24 at 8:37 AM revealed Resident 1 ate eggs bites of toast and some of the tater…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-15 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(1) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a notice of Medicare non-coverage (NOMNC-a form that gives the last day that Medicare will cover costs and provides instructions for appealing that decision) at least 48 hours prior to discharge from Medicare services for 2 (Residents 16 and 18) of 3 sampled residents and failed provide the required Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN-a form that lists the items or services that the facility expects Medicare will not pay for, along with an estimate of the costs for the items and services and the reasons why Medicare may not pay) for 3 of 3 (Residents 16, 18 and 140) sampled residents. The facility census was 31. Findings are: Record review of Resident 16's Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Protection Notification Review revealed that Resident 16's Skilled Services Episode began on 3/24/23 and the Last Covered Medicare Day was 6/28/23. The NOMNC was provided to Resident 16's representative on 6/28/23 and signed by Resident 16's representative on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure reference number 175 NAC 12-006.09D3 Based on record review and interviews, the staff failed to provide care and services for bowel elimination by failing to provide as needed medications to promote regular bowel movements for 2 (Resident 8 and 3) of 5 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 31. The findings are: A. Record review of an undated facility Bowel Protocol reveled that the night nurse will run the bowel movement (BM) report for each hall (to give to the medication aides) and write down on the sheet what day each resident is on (starting at day 1 of lack of bowel movements). The policy indicated to provide the interventions below depending on which day (without bowel movement) the resident was on: - Day 1 of no BM give prune juice, - Day 2 of no BM give whatever as needed laxative medication the resident has ordered (i.e., Senna, Dulcolax, MiraLAX, Milk of Magnesia, etc.), - Day 3 of no BM the night shift nurse is to give a suppository, and the day shift nurse will assess…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10D Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility staff failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Observations of 25 medications administered revealed there were 2 errors resulting in an error rate of 8%. The error affected 2 (Resident 134 and 139) of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility identified a census of 31. Findings are: Review of the facility's Administering Medications policy, dated April 2019, revealed the following: -medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders -the individual administering the medication checks the label to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time, and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication -the following information is checked/verified for each resident prior to administering medications: a. allergies to medications; and b. Vitals signs, if necessary A. Observation on 8/9/23 at 3:15 PM revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-D prepared Resident 134's medications for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.17B Based on observation, interview and record review; the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident 4) of 1 sampled resident's Trilogy Ventilator Non-Invasive (a machine used to deliver positive pressure to the lungs to prevent the airway from restricting) mask was cleaned and stored in a manner to prevent the potential for cross contamination and failed to provide suprapubic catheter (a tube inserted directly into the bladder to drain urine) care to for 1 (Resident 9) of 1 sampled residents . The facility census was 31. Findings are: A. Observation on 8/9/23 at 1:19 PM revealed Resident 4's Trilogy mask and tubing connected and draped across the bedside drawers with oily residue noted on the mask and residual liquid in the tubing. Further observation of Resident 4's cleaning device for the Trilogy mask revealed the device placed behind Resident 4's tv on top of the dresser with multiple personal items around the device. An interview on 8/9/23 at 1:19 PM, Resident 4 revealed that the Trilogy mask is used nightly by Resident 4 and that the mask…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-05-23 for 21 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVID HEALTHCARE GROUP — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 51.7+0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.9+0.1 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BRASS NE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
BSD BEIS HEALTH TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
COPPER NE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
DOURO VALLEY INVESTMENT, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
GOLD NE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
NE 11 HOLDINGS OPCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
NE SNF HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
SF 4140 OLDE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD REAL PROPERTY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/01/2023
SILVER NE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
TULIP INVESTMENTS NE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
HOHENSEE, KENTIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 08/02/2023
SILBERSTEIN, ARIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/02/2023

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-12.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$521K
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 60%Medicare 13%Other / private 27%

This home reported $521K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$442per resident / day
operating cost
$13,443per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$393per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NE

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nebraska Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Nebraska
$8,377/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,350/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 285146. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next