No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Adept Nursing & Rehab of Sutherland

333 Maple Street, Sutherland, NE 69165 · For profit - Corporation · 60 certified beds · (308) 386-4393 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0610) — most recent Mar 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$51,637 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $51,637 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-05)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (70%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 30% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1001 Deerwood Dr · (308) 532-8783 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1845 W A St · (308) 532-5539 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
100 N West County Rd · (308) 386-4757 · Call to confirm hours
Park
West South River Road · (308) 532-4729 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased25.7%19.0%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.7%5.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder6.1%1.4%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.7%2.8%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.9%4.3%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.3%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury12.3%4.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.1%18.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.3%19.3%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.6%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.7%4.0%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control31.0%25.9%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table40.4%20.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.0%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine71.0%75.9%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.7%20.7%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit24.7%11.4%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.011.811.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.431.921.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

29.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 91 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

29.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
69.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.11U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.01hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 69.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 46 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF29.4%CMS range 23.3–38.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 7.5–15.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge69.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge71.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge67.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.5%CMS range 4.5–12.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.121.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.35
RN hours/ resident / day
0.84
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.27
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.46
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.27
RN hoursweekends
69.5%
Total nursing turnover
62.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 43.3 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.46 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.27 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-05)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-19)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

39 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(I) Based on observations, interviews, and record review; the facility failed to ensure water temperatures in resident restroom sinks and a resident accessible dining room sink were 120 degrees or below, placing 6 (Residents 9, 15, 26, 29, 38, and 40) of 6 sampled residents at risk for burns. The facility census was 42. Findings Are: The facility was notified on 3/2/2026 at 2:30 PM of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 4/15/2025. The IJ was removed on 3/2/2026, as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. A record review of facility policy Safe Water Temperatures with a revision date of 4/2/2025 revealed water temperatures will be set to a temperature of no more than 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Maintenance staff will check water heater temperature controls and the temperatures of tap water in all hot water circuits weekly and as needed. A record review of a Burn Exposure Chart on the antiscald.com website dated 2026, revealed a 2nd degree burn can occur within…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited beforedisputed · IDR2025-09-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(I)Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to accurately assess a resident for elopement, failed to provide interventions to prevent elopements, and failed to implement interventions to prevent further elopement for 1 resident (Resident 1) of 3 sampled residents. The facility census was 41.Findings are:The facility was notified on [DATE] at 3:45 PM of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on [DATE]. The IJ was removed on [DATE] as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification.Review of a facility policy titled Elopement and Wandering Residents dated 2025 revealed the facility would ensure that residents who are at risk for elopement receive adequate supervision to prevent accidents. An Elopement occurs when a resident leaves the premises or a safe area without authorization and or any necessary supervision to do so. The facility would establish and utilize a systematic approach in monitoring and managing residents at risk for elopement including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H) Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to assess non-verbal indications of pain, and implement, monitor and revise interventions to manage pain for 1 (Resident 3) of 3 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 45. Findings are: A record review of a facility policy, Pain Management with a date of 4/1/2024, revealed the following: -To help a resident attain or maintain their highest practicable level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being and to prevent or manage pain, the facility will. -Recognize when the resident is experiencing pain or activities where the resident may experience pain. -Assess resident for pain upon admission, during ongoing scheduled assessments, and when a significant change in condition or status occurs (e.g. change in behavior, new pain, or an exacerbation of pain). -Manage or prevent pain, consistent with the resident's comprehensive assessment (Minimum Data Set) and care plan (a document outlining a person's healthcare or personal care needs, their medical history,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility failed to prepare foods according to the recipe, including pureed foods, to ensure the nutritive value was maintained. This had the potential to affect all 42 residents.Pureed residents were 1, 5, 22Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(J)(i) Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to prepare foods according to the recipe, including pureed foods for Residents 1, 5, and 22, to ensure nutritive value was maintained. This had the potential to affect all residents.Findings are: A continuous observation in the kitchen on 3/4/26 from 9:05 AM through 10:45 AM revealed Cook-B performed the following:At 9:15 AM, Cook-B removed 1.5 pounds (lbs) of sliced raw bacon from a package, then chopped the bacon into small pieces. The bacon was added to a skillet and cooked on the stove until 9:23 AM.At 9:25 AM, Cook-B measured 32 ounces (oz) of sour cream into a measuring cup.At 9:28 AM Cook-B cracked 30 uncooked eggs into a bowl, then whisked them.At 9:46 AM, Cook-B removed 12 pounds of spinach from a colander which had been draining over the sink,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the freezers were maintained at 0 degrees or below, failed to prevent the potential for cross contamination when handling raw meat, and failed to use or dispose of foods prior to expiration date, This had the potential to affect all 42 residents.Findings are:A.Record review of facility-provided documents of temperature records/documents from the walk-in freezer, the upright deep-freeze, and the refrigerator/freezer combination (records did not identify which freezer the temperature logs were related to) revealed the following measurements documented above 0 degrees Fahrenheit:September 2025, AM shift measurements -30 days with data listed, and 11 of 30 days (September 19th-30th) ranged from 6-20 degrees. (The PM shift had 25 of 30 days with documented temperatures, all below zero).September 2025, AM measurements listed 30 days of data that ranged from 2-11 degrees. PM measurements 24 days had data recorded, and all 24 ranged from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure informed consent was obtained for 1 (Resident 1) of 5 sampled residents' psychotropic medications. The facility identified a census of 42.Findings:Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a progressive lung disease that restricts breathing, often caused by smoking), Type 2 diabetes mellitus (a metabolic disorder when the body cannot regulate levels of sugar in the blood), schizophrenia (a mental disorder that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves), bipolar disorder (a mental illness with episodes of extreme mood changes), depression, and anxiety.A record review of Resident 1's medication orders in Point Click Care (PCC, an electronic medical record system), revealed that Resident 1 had physician orders for clonazepam (an antianxiety medication) 0.5 mg by mouth every 12 hours as needed for symptoms of anxiety with a order date of 01/28/2026,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05 (G)Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was a duration for psychotropic medication for 1 (Resident 1) of 5 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 42.Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a progressive lung disease that restricts breathing, often caused by smoking), Type 2 diabetes mellitus (a metabolic disorder when the body cannot regulate levels of sugar in the blood), schizophrenia (a mental disorder that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves), bipolar disorder (a mental illness with episodes of extreme mood changes), depression, and anxiety.A record review of Resident 1's medication orders in Point Click Care (PCC, an electronic medical record system), revealed that Resident 1 had physician orders for clonazepam (an antianxiety medication) 0.5 mg by mouth every 12 hours as needed for symptoms of anxiety with an order date of 01/28/2026 and no end…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iv) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow their bowel protocol to prevent constipation for 1 (Resident 29) of 5 sampled residents. The facility census was 42.Findings Are: A record review of a facility document BM (bowel movement) List revealed Bowel Routine as per facility protocol with the following guidance:-Give Prune Juice if no BM in 2 days.-Give MOM (milk of magnesia) if no BM in 3 days -Must document bowel sounds daily starting day 3 until BM occurs.-Give suppository if no BM in 4 days.-Notify MD (physician) if refused or no results from suppository on day 4. A record review of Resident 29's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a diagnosis of chronic idiopathic constipation. A record review of Resident 29's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure the attending physician reviewed and acted upon, or provided rationale for not acting upon, recommendations made by the pharmacist during their monthly medication regimen reviews for 1 (Resident 33) out of 5 sampled residents. The facility census was 42.Findings are:A.Record review of Resident 33's admission record dated 3/5/2026 revealed an admission date of 8/3/2023 with listed diagnoses:-Major Depressive Disorder, Recurrent-Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder-Alzheimer's Disease with Late Onset -Cerebral Infarction (Stroke) -Paranoid Schizophrenia (a chronic mental disorder with intense, irrational delusions and/or hallucinations, such as believing they are being plotted against or monitored) -Conversion Disorder with Seizures or ConvulsionsRecord Review of Resident 33's order summary dated 3/4/2026 revealed the following medication orders:Desvenlafaxine (a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) used to treat major depressive disorder in adults) ER (extended release) oral tablet extended release 24-hour 50…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-09-24 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete competencies to ensure proficiency for 8 of 9 sampled staff which had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 41.Findings are:In an interview completed on 09/23/2024 at 12:50 PM with Medication Aide A(MA-A), MA-A stated that a competency had not been completed on the services they provide to residents in the last year.Record review of MA-A facility supplied documents revealed a date of hire of 10/20/2023. There were no competencies for MA-A supplied in the documents.Record review of Medication Aide B (MA-B) facility supplied documents revealed a date of hire of 06/09/2025. There were no competencies for MA-B supplied in the documents.Record review of Nurse Aide D (NA-D) facility supplied documents revealed a date of hire of 06/24/2025. There were no competencies for NA-D supplied in the documents.Record review of Nurse Aide E (NA-E) facility supplied documents revealed a date of hire of 01/05/2025. There were no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2025-09-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(H)Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to investigate and report to the regulatory agencies possible incident of abuse and or neglect for 1 residents (Resident 1) of 3 sampled residents. The facility census was 41.Findings are:Review of a facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation and dated 2025 revealed the definition of an Alleged Violation is a situation or occurrence that is observed or reported by staff, resident, relative, visitor or other but has not been investigated and if verified could be indication of noncompliance with the Federal requirements related to mistreatment, neglect, or abuse, including injuries of unknown source. An immediate investigation is warranted of alleged abuse and or neglect. Reporting of all alleged violations to the administrator, state agency, adult protective services and all other required agencies immediately but not later then 2 hours after allegation is made if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury or not later then…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12--006.04(F)(i)(5) Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of ongoing pain for 1 (Resident 3) of 3 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 45. Findings are: A record review of an undated facility policy, Notification of Changes, revealed the facility must inform the resident's physician when there are circumstances that require a need to alter treatment or require a new treatment. A record review of a facility policy, Pain Management with a date of 4/1/2024, revealed if assessment findings of a resident's pain indicate the resident's pain is not adequately controlled, staff will notify the physician to consider a revision of the resident's pain regimen. A record review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 3 on 1/22/2021. Resident 3 had diagnoses of cognitive communication deficit (difficulties in communication skills), dementia (a usually progressive condition marked by the development of multiple cognitive deficits such as memory impairment, aphasia, and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.09(E) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan (CCP, a document that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment) regarding pain for 1 (Resident 1) of 3 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 45. Findings are: A record review of a facility policy, Comprehensive Care Plans with a date of 4/1/2024, revealed the facility would develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified on the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used to determine a resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems). Additionally, the policy revealed all Care Assessment Areas (CAAs) triggered by the MDS will be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to assess and evaluate underlying causes of behavior to prevent the unnecessary use of a psychotropic (medications that affect the mind, emotions, or behavior, often used to treat mental health disorders) medication for 1 (Resident 3) of 1 sampled resident. The facility identified a census of 45. Findings are: A record review of an undated facility policy Use of Psychotropic Medications revealed the following: -Psychotropic medication should only be used to treat the resident's medical symptoms -Underlying medical conditions should be identified and ruled out prior to initiating a psychotropic medication -Non-pharmacological interventions must be attempted to minimize the need for psychotropic medications. A record review of a facility policy, Pain Management with a date of 4/1/2024, revealed staff will observe nonverbal indicators of pain which may indicate the presence of pain, such as increased or recurring restlessness, facial expressions, behaviors (such as resisting care,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.11(E) Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, label, cover, and use or discard food and drink items to prevent the potential for foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect all 39 residents that resided at the facility and consumed foods from the kitchen. Findings are: A record review of 2017 Nebraska Food Code, under section 3-501.17 revealed food held for more than 24 hours should be clearly marked to indicate the date by which food should be consumed or discarded. An observation on 12/16/24 at 10:57 AM during the initial kitchen tour revealed the following refrigerated items: -2 unlabeled, undated bulk bags of salad mix of lettuce, purple cabbage, carrots, and one of the bags contained lettuce which had turned brown. -One 1-gallon ziploc bag with lettuce, unlabeled. -1 unlabeled gallon-sized bag of bulk shredded carrots, mushy with liquid in bag. -1 opened 1-gallon size bottle of [NAME] Lynch salad dressing, labeled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(B) Based on record review and interview, the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment used for Care Planning purpose) was not coded correctly for pressure ulcer of 1 (Resident 34) out of 10 sampled residents' pressure sores. The facility census was 39. Findings are: A record review of the admission Record with the printed date of December 18th, 2024 revealed that Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Hyperglycemia (a condition where someone with type 2 diabetes has elevated blood sugar levels, also known as high blood sugar or hyperglycemia), Pressure Ulcer to Left Heel, unstageable (Unstageable pressure ulcers are a type of bed sore that occurs when prolonged pressure on an area of the skin cuts off blood flow and oxygen to the tissue). A record review of Resident 24's Care Plan dated 12/12/24 revealed a focus, goal and intervention for Pressure Ulcers. A record review of Resident 24's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.09(F)(i) Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to develop baseline care plans (a document that outlines a resident's healthcare needs and safety concerns when they are first admitted to a nursing home) within 48 hours of admission as required for 2 (Residents 9 and 96) of 2 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 39. Findings are: A record review of an undated facility policy, Baseline Care Plan revealed baseline care plans will be developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission. A. A record review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident 9 on 6/14/2024 with diagnoses of: depression, repeated falls, difficulty swallowing, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (a common lung disease that causes breathing problems and restricted airflow). A record review of Resident 9's AS - Baseline Careplan - V 1 revealed a signed date of 6/17/2024, which was more than 48 hours after Resident 9's admission. B. A record review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident 96 on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.09(E)(iii) Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan (CCP, a document that outlines a resident's needs and the services that are to be provided to meet these needs) regarding activities of daily living (ADLs) for 1 (Resident 97) of 12 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 39. Findings are: A record review of a facility policy, Comprehensive Care Plans with a date of 4/1/2024 indicated the CCP would, at a minimum, include the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psycho-social well-being and resident specific interventions that reflect the resident's needs and preferences. A record review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident 97 on 11/13/2024 with diagnoses of Chronic Respiratory Failure (a long-term condition that prevents the body from exchanging oxygen and carbon dioxide properly,) Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (a common lung disease that causes breathing problems and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(F)(iii) Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to identify and update the comprehensive care plan with interventions after a fall for one (Resident 39) of one sampled resident. The facility identified a census of 39. Findings Are: A record review on 12/16/24 of Resident 39's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated process that helps to standardize assessments, improve the accuracy of care, and facilitate care management) dated 11/18/24 reveals in Section GG: Resident 39 was independent with eating. They required set up assistance with oral hygiene. They were total dependence with transfers and toileting. They required moderate assistance with upper body dressing and maximum assistance with lower body dressing. A record review on 12/16/24 of Resident 39's diagnosis revealed diagnoses of: -Amyotrophic lateral Sclerosis (a terminal, progressive, and fatal neurological disorder that affects the nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord) -Unspecified Osteoarthritis (a condition that causes the breakdown of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-00609(H)(iv)(5) Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide interventions for constipation for 1 (Resident 15) of 1 sampled resident. The facility identified a census of 39. Findings are: A record review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 15 on 8/3/2023 with diagnoses of dementia and constipation. A record review of Resident 15's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used for care planning) with a date of 10/15/2024 indicated Resident 15 had severe cognitive impairment, required moderate assistance with toileting and was occasionally incontinent of bowel. A record review of Resident 15's undated Care Plan revealed a focus area of risk for constipation due to medication side effects. Interventions implemented on 12/29/2023 included to administer medication as ordered, monitor to response to medication, dietary consult as needed, record bowel movement pattern each day, and report irregularities of bowel patterns to the physician. A record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(vi)(3)(g) Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews; the facility failed to administer oxygen following the prescriber's orders for 1 (Resident 9) of 4 sampled residents. The facility identified a census of 39. Findings are: A record review of a facility policy, Oxygen Concentrator, with a last reviewed/revised date of 12/3/2024, under the use of the concentrator indicated the nurse shall verify physician's orders for the rate of flow. A record review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident 9 on 6/14/2024 with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD, a common lung disease that causes breathing problems and restricted airflow.) A record review of Resident 9's undated Care Plan revealed a focus area for impaired respiratory status with risks for shortness of breath, respiratory distress, increased anxiety, and hypoxia (low oxygen levels.) The area included an intervention, initiated on 12/16/2024, to provide oxygen therapy as ordered by the physician. A record review of Resident 9's Order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10D Based on observations, record review and interviews; the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Observations of 26 medications opportunities revealed 4 errors resulting in a medication error rate 16%. The errors affected 1 (Residents 2) of 3 sampled residents. The facility census was 39. Findings: A record review of the undated Medication Administration policy revealed the following: -Administer within 60 minutes prior to or after scheduled time unless otherwise ordered by physician. -Administer medication as ordered in accordance with manufacturer specifications. A record review of the Medication list for Resident 2 revealed: -A start date of 5/24/24 for Advair Diskus 100/50 MCG/dose 1 puff inhale orally two times a day for Asthma. Rinse mouth after use. -A start date of 5/24/24 for Azelastine HCL Solution (treats allergy symptoms like a stuffy or runny nose, sneezing, and itching) 137 micrograms (MCG)/Spray 1 spray in both nostrils two times a day. -A start date of 5/25/24 Blood glucose( amount of sugar in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18(D) Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene and change gloves while performing catheter care for one (Resident 39) of one sampled resident. The facility identified a census of 39. Findings Are: A record review of a policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions dated 3/20/24 stated on page 1, number 3b: PPE (personal protection equipment) for enhanced barrier precautions is only necessary when performing high-contact care activities. Page 2 number 4 stated high-contact care activities include: d) providing hygiene, f) changing briefs, g) device care including urinary catheters. An observation on 12/18/24 at 7:19 PM of Nurse Aide (NA)-C and NA-D performing foley catheter care on Resident 39. An Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP, an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in nursing homes. Enhanced Barrier Precautions involve gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities for residents known to be colonized or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement safety checks, education, or hazard assessments to ensure resident saftey for use of a bath chair, this affected 1 (Resident 4) of 1 resident sampled. Facility identified a census of 47. Findings are: An interview on 09/26/2024 at 1:31 PM with Bath Aide (BA)-D revealed that all residents are brought down to the bath house in their wheelchair or walked down to the bath house for their bathing needs. BA-D continued to reveal however there was once exception and that was Resident 4, who prefers being transported on a shower chair from their room to the bath house and back. An interview on 09/26/2024 at 2:19 PM with BA-C revealed, BA-C provides Resident 4 a shower during evening shifts. BA-C states that Resident 4's preference is to take a shower in the evening and that Resident 4 will be provided a shower in the shower chair provided from the facility and transported back and forth from their room to the bath house. BA-C explains that they are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D1c Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with grooming to 3 (Residents 1, 12, and 15) of 3 sampled residents. The facility census was 48. A. A record review of Resident 1's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool utilized to develop resident care plans, dated 1/23/24 revealed in Section C a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4/15, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Section GG revealed the resident required partial or moderate assistance for toileting, personal hygiene, and transfers. The resident required substantial or maximum assistance with upper body dressing and was dependent on staff assistance for lower body dressing. A record review of Resident 1's undated Care Plan revealed the resident required extensive, one-person physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09B Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to code dialysis on the Minimum Data Set (MDS a federally mandated assessment tool utilized to develop resident care plans) assessment for 1 (Resident 1) of 1 sampled resident. The facility census was 48. The Findings Are: A record review of facility policy MDS 3.0 Completion dated 8/1/2023, revealed Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. According to federal regulations, the facility conducts initially and periodically a comprehensive, accurate and standardized assessment of each resident's functional capacity, using the RAI specified by the State. A record review of Resident 1's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of End Stage Renal Disease and Dependence on Renal Dialysis. A record review of Resident 1's End of PPS Part A Stay MDS dated [DATE], Section O revealed dialysis was not indicated as a special treatment that resident had received. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09C1c Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise a Care Plan for a provider order 1 (Resident 1) of 1 sampled resident. The facility census was 48. The Findings Are: A record review of Resident 1's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) and Dependence on Renal Dialysis. A record review conducted on 2/14/24 of Resident 1's undated Care Plan revealed The resident needs hemodialysis related to (r/t) ESRD. Presence of right subclavian catheter (removed on 12/20/2023). Stitches in place: Daily Dressing Change. A record review conducted on 2/14/2024 of Resident 1's current Physician's Orders revealed the resident did not have an order for a daily dressing change related to stitches being in place post-removal of a right subclavian catheter. A record review of Resident 1's January 2024 Medication Administration Record revealed the order Clean area to right clavicle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to remove a dressing per the physician's order and failed to document in the Treatment Administration Record that the AV fistula dressing was being removed and the site was being monitored as required. This affected 1 (Resident 1) of 1 sampled resident. The facility census was 48. The Findings Are: A. A record review of Resident 1's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of End Stage Renal Disease and Dependence on Renal Dialysis. A record review of Resident 1's progress note dated 1/15/2024 at 9:08 AM by the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the DON, Administrator, resident's child, and a social worker from the dialysis center had a meeting to discuss how the resident was tolerating dialysis and concerns from the dialysis center. The social worker voiced a concern that the dressing on the resident's arteriovenous (AV) fistula site was not always being removed between dialysis treatments.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.17 Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews; the facility staff failed to perform wound care to prevent the potential for cross-contamination and infection. This failure had the potential to affect 2 (Resident 2 and 9) of 2 sampled residents. The facility census was 48. Findings are: A. A record review of Resident 2's admission Record revealed the resident had an Original admission date of 4/20/2021. Resident 2 had a diagnosis of a pressure ulcer of the sacral region, stage III. A record review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a comprehensive assessment tool used to develop a resident's Care Plan) with a date of 12/23/2023 under Section-M- Skin Conditions revealed the resident was at risk for developing pressure ulcers/injuries and had a pressure ulcer/injury, a scar over a boney prominence. Resident 2 had one stage 2 pressure ulcer. A record review of Resident 2's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) from 2/1/2024 to 2/29/2024 revealed an order with a start date of 2/9/2024 to cleanse the left sacrum wound with normal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-11-16 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC12-006.04D2 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a qualified Dietary Manager. This had the potential to affect all of the residents who consumed food from the kitchen. The facility staff identified a census of 42. An interview with the Food Service Supervisor (FSS) on 11/14/23 from 11:00 AM to 11:12 AM revealed that the FSS was enrolled in dietary manager classes and will graduate in the Spring of 2024 and was currently not certified as a dietary manager. The interview also revealed the FSS splits their time with this facility and a second facility. The FSS verbalized there is a Consultant Registered Dietician who comes to the facility monthly. Record review of a list of key personnel received from the facility for this location revealed that the FSS was listed as the Food Service Supervisor, and there was no Certified Dietary Manager on the list.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11E Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain cleanliness of equipment, floors, walls, stove, oven and storage areas, failed to ensure puree foods were temped prior to serving, failed to perform hand hygiene and gloving during meal prep and service, failed to prepare food in a sanitary condition to prevent cross contamination and food borne illness. This had the potential to affect all residents that ate foods prepared in the facility kitchen. The facility census was 42. The findings are: A. An initial kitchen tour observation on 11/13/23 from 9:50 AM to 10:47 AM revealed the following concerns: - The floor around the dishwasher and below the juice machine had debris such as old food particles and a buildup of dirt and grime. - The shelf below the kitchen work shelf and the shelf above the stove had a buildup of debris such as old food particles and dust. - There were lids and cups directly on the kitchen floor, including a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number NAC 175 12-006.17 AND 12-006.17D The facility staff failed to perform hand hygiene and gloving during personal hygiene cares and failed to complete personal hygiene cares in a manner to prevent the potential for cross contamination for 2 (Residents 13 and 19) of 2 sampled residents and failed to perform hand hygiene correctly after leaving a Enhanced Barrier Precaution room. The facility identified a census of 42. Findings are: A. Record review of Resident 13's Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used for resident care planning) dated 9/22/2023 revealed under Section C that the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (an assessment that determines a resident's cognitive status) a score of 7. This indicated the resident was moderately to severely impaired cognitively. Section G revealed the resident needed full assistance with personal hygiene, toileting and transfers. Record review of Resident 13's active diagnosis list last revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-11-16 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure their Infection Control Nurse completed specialized training in infection prevention and control prior to assuming the role of the Infection Preventionist. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 42. The Findings Are: An interview on 11/15/23 at 11:10 AM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-C confirmed LPN-C was the facility's Infection Control Nurse. LPN-C revealed they have not completed all of the CDC Nursing Home Infection Preventionist Training Course but has Modules 1-12A done. An interview on 11/15/23 at 6:50 AM with the facility Administrator revealed LPN-C was currently enrolled in the CDC Nursing Home Infection Preventionist Training Course. A record review of the CDC Nursing Home Infection Preventionist Training Course for LPN-C verified the completion of only Modules 1 through 12A. A record review of the facility's Infection Preventionist Job Description, undated, revealed a Required Qualification of Completed specialized training in infection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05 (21) Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain 1 (Resident 3) of 3 sampled resident's dignity as evidenced by placing Resident 3 to face the wall during dining and in their room. The facility census was 42. The findings are: A record review of Resident 3's Face Sheet dated 11/16/2023 revealed Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of Other Encephalopathy (a disease in which the functioning of the brain is affected by some agent or condition). A record review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Section C revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not completed as the resident is rarely/never understood. Section G revealed the resident required extensive assistance with bed mobility and eating, and total assistance with transferring and toileting. An observation on 11/13/23 at 1:01 PM revealed Resident 3 was brought to the dining room in their wheelchair and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number NAC 17512-006.09D4 Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement interventions to maintain range of motion for 1 (Resident 13) of 2 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 42. Findings are: Record review of Resident 13's Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used for resident care planning) dated 9/22/2023 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (an assessment used to determine a resident's cognitive condition) score of 7. A score of 7 indicated severely to moderately impaired cognition. Section G indicated the resident needed full assistance with personal hygiene, toileting and transfers. Record review of Resident 13's active diagnosis list revealed diagnoses as follows: peripheral vascular disease, unspecified, contracture, left and right hand, and chronic pain. Record review of Resident 13's Care Plan with a revision date of 6/28/2022 revealed a problem for the resident being at risk for decline in functional status related to limited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement interventions for pain management, failed to evaluate the effectiveness and failed to re-evaluate interventions to manage 1 (Resident 13) of 2 sampled resident's pain. The facility identified a census of 42. Findings are: Record review of Resident 13's Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used for care planning) dated 9/22/23 revealed in Section C, a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) (an assessment that determines a resident's cognitive function) score of 7, which indicated the resident is severely to moderately cognitively impaired. Section G revealed the resident was full assistance with personal cares, toileting, and transfers. The MDS in Section J revealed Resident 13 was in frequent pain and recieved scheduled pain medications. Record review of Resident 13's active diagnoses listed included: Chronic pain and contractures to left and right hands. An interview with Resident 13 on 11/14/23 at 7:59 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.09D1 Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to follow resident preferences for bathing for 2 residents (Residents 1 and 2) of 3 residents reviewed. The facility census was 39. Findings are: A. Record review of the undated facility Administrative Admissions Packet revealed the section titled Resident Rights. The section revealed that the resident has a right to a dignified existence. The section revealed the resident has the right to choose health care consistent with his or her plan of care. The resident has a right to reasonable accommodation of individual needs and preferences. Record review of the Facility Assessment Tool dated 8/9/23 revealed the paragraph in Part 1 titled Other. The paragraph revealed that Resident Preferences and staffing: during the admission process the resident/family are asked about their normal daily schedule and what they were used to at home. The facility staffs to accommodate residents who prefer to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.09D1b Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to follow the plan of care for resident transfers (movement from one surface to another such as from the bed to a chair) to prevent the potential for decline in physical ability for 1 resident (Resident 1) of 3 residents reviewed; and the facility failed to provide physical therapy as ordered for 1 resident (Resident 1) of 3 residents reviewed to improve the resident's physical abilities. The facility census was 39. Findings are: A. Record review of the undated facility Administrative Admissions Packet revealed the section titled Resident Rights. The section revealed that the resident has a right to be fully informed in advance about care, treatment, and any changes in that care or treatment which may affect the resident's well-being. The resident has the right to choose health care consistent with his or her plan of care. The resident has a right to reasonable accommodation of individual needs and preferences. Record review of the Facility Assessment Tool dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-03-05 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — pattern
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to evaluate resources related to decision-making for 1 sampled resident (Resident 1) with cognitive impairment. The facility identified a census of 42. A record review of Resident 1's face sheet revealed that Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a progressive lung disease that restricts breathing, often caused by smoking), Type 2 diabetes mellitus (a metabolic disorder when the body cannot regulate levels of sugar in the blood), schizophrenia (a mental disorder that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves), bipolar disorder (a mental illness with episodes of extreme mood changes), depression, and anxiety. The record also revealed that Resident 1 made decisions on their own behalf and that there was not a power of attorney (a legal document that allows one person to act on behalf of another) or guardian (a court-appointed person who has legal authority over someone who can no longer make…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$51,637 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $19,120 — penalty dated 2026-03-05
  • $32,517 — penalty dated 2025-09-24
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-05-02 for 45 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVID HEALTHCARE GROUP — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
NE 11 HOLDINGS OPCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 08/02/2023
BRASS NE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
BSD BEIS HEALTH TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
COPPER NE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
DOURO VALLEY INVESTMENT, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
GOLD NE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
NE SNF HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
SF 4140 OLDE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD REAL PROPERTY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/01/2023
SILVER NE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
TULIP INVESTMENTS NE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
PUCYLOWSKI, TEDIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 08/02/2023
SILBERSTEIN, ARIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/02/2023

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$2.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$757K
Related-party expense30% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 71%Medicare 13%Other / private 15%

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $757K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 30% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$328per resident / day
operating cost
$9,977per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$325per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NE

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nebraska Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Nebraska
$8,377/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,350/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 285141. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next