Runnells Center For Rehabilitation & Healthcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 75 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 63 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 300 beds and averages 252.6 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 47 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.24 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.89 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.39 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #: 2728562, 2728912 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of pertinent facility documents on 1/27/26, 2/2/26 and 2/4/26, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from significant medication error. This occurred on 1/23/26, when a Licensed Practical Nurse Unit Manager (LPN/UM) incorrectly used a medication list belonging to another resident (Resident #6) to reconcile Resident #5's medications. Review of Resident #5's January 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed incorrect medications were listed and the staff administered the wrong medications to Resident #5 on these dates as follows: -Furosemide (medication used to treat excess fluid in the body) 20 mg tablet daily (Administered on 1/24/26, 1/25/26, and 1/26/26).-Lithium Carbonate Extended Release (a mood stabilizer used to treat bipolar disorder) 450 mg tablet daily (Administered on 1/24/26, 1/25/26, and 1/26/26).-Trazodone (an antidepressant/anxiety) 100 mg tablet at bedtime (Administered on 1/23/26, 1/24/26, and 1/25/26).-Clonazepam (treats seizure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
  Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and review of pertinent facility documentations on 4/13/26, 4/16/26, and 4/17/26, it was determined that the facility Social Worker (SW) failed to review an electronic mail (email) message dated 4/10/26 about an alleged verbal abuse. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse and neglect and was evidenced by the following: A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 2/25/26, revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15, indicating the resident's cognition was moderately impaired. The MDS further revealed that the resident required assistance from staff for completion of their activities of daily living (ADLs). On 4/16/26 at 12:18 PM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #1 concerning the 4/9/26 incident. Resident #1 stated that it was nighttime and 2 female nurses, described as one with black hair and the other with reddish dark hair, pointed their fingers and swore at me. The resident denied staff being rough with their PEG tube cleaning or causing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-04 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint # 2723777 Based on interviews and record review it was determined that the facility failed to allow a resident with an infectious diagnosis that required Enhanced Barrier Precautions to return after being hospitalized despite the facility's ability to provide that care. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for discharges.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:According to Resident #2's admission Record (AR), the resident was admitted with diagnoses including but not limited to: compartment syndrome (increased pressure in an area of the body that compromises blood flow and tissue function), unspecified, subsequent encounter; paraplegia (impairment or loss of motor and sensory function in the lower half of the body), unspecified; muscle weakness (generalized); and need for assistance with personal care. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 12/27/2025, Resident #2 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-31 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint # 2638227 Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed ensure staff consistently documented care/services provided to residents in accordance with professional standard. This deficient practice was identified for 2 (two) of 3 (three) residents (Resident #1 and #3) reviewed for reviewed for accident/incident, and was evidenced as follows:This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as casefinding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist.Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #2585508 Based on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to report to the New Jersey State Department of Health (NJDOH) an injury of unknown origin and implement facility's policy for accidents and incidents by not thoroughly updating the care plan after an assessment. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for accident/incident, and was evidenced as follows: On 10/31/25 at 9:00 AM, during an interview with the surveyor, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) informed the surveyor that there were no reportable events (report filed with the NJDOH) found on file for Resident #3.The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #3. A review of the admission Record, (an admission summary) reflected the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia (memory loss with cognitive decline) with other behavioral disturbances.A review of the most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 6/8/25, reflected…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint # 2638227 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of a resident's weight and monitor the resident's food intake in accordance with the resident's care plan. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 closed records reviewed (Resident #1) and was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #1. A review of the admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease, dementia (memory loss with cognitive decline) with psychotic disturbances, and type 2 diabetes (high blood sugar).A review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 9/24/25, reflected a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 2 out 15, which indicated a severely impaired cognition. Section E - Behavior reflected the resident had behavioral symptoms (such as hitting or scratching self, pacing,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure three of three residents (Resident (R) 172, R204, and R218) rights to a dignified dining experience. The residents were unable to protect their right to dignity due to their impaired cognitive status creating the potential for feeling of embarrassment or frustration.Findings include:Review of R172's electronic medical record (EMR) annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), located under the MDS tab, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/10/25 revealed her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was nine out of 15, this score revealed she had moderate cognitive impairment.Review of R204's EMR revealed an annual MDS, located under the MDS tab, with an ARD date of 06/04/25 revealed his BIMS score was four out of 15, this indicated he had severe cognitive impairment.Review of R218's EMR quarterly MDS with a ARD of 08/05/25, located under the MDS tab, revealed her BIMS score was zero which indicated she had severe cognitive impairment.Observation on 08/12/25 at 9:20 AM in the 3W unit dining room,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of one residents (Resident (R) 16) reviewed with contractures out of 35 sample residents received a splint on her hands per the care plan. Failure to use the hand splints has the potential for the resident to develop skin breakdown in the palms of her hands.Findings include:Review of R16's Face Sheet located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the admission tab documented that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and contracture of muscle of right and left hands.Review of R16's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/11/25 located in the resident's EMR under the MDS tab revealed the resident had persistent vegetative state (a severe brain disorder where a person is awake but unaware of themselves or their surroundings), functional limitation in range of motion bilaterally in upper and lower extremities, and was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper glove use and hand washing was used during one of one meal services observed. One of one cook (Cook (C) 1) and two of three dietary aides (DA) (DA2 and DA4) touched ready-to-eat foods and the inside of coffee cups without performing hand hygiene when moving between tasks. The failure to ensure proper hand washing and glove use could contaminate the food served to the residents.Findings include:Observation on 08/13/25 at 10:30 AM in the kitchen revealed DA4 placing Styrofoam coffee cups with his gloved hands onto a tray. He put his fingers inside of each cup as he placed the cup on the tray. DA4 then filled a large pitcher with coffee and filled each coffee cup. When DA4 had filled the tray of coffee cups with coffee he carried it to a heated cart. DA4 opened the cart with the same gloves and then returned to fill another tray, again touching the inside of each cup. DA4 never changed his gloves during this process.Observation on 08/13/25 at 10:45 AM in the kitchen revealed C1 had gloves on and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of one Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) (LPN 4) and one of one Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) (CNA 13) used proper glove technique when providing wound care and personal care for one of one residents (Resident (R) 18) observed for wound care of 35 sample residents. This practice placed the resident at an increased risk for infections.Findings include:Observation on 08/12/25 at 10:34 AM of CNA13 as she provided personal care to R18. CNA13 entered R18's room and washed her hands and then put on a protective gown and two pairs of gloves. CNA13 retrieved her cell phone from the supply cart outside of the door and looked at her phone while a basin was filled with soapy water. R18 was handed a soapy washcloth, and he washed his own face. CNA13 took another cloth and washed his chest, abdomen, underarms, hands, and back. CNA13 then dried those areas with a towel, applied lotion and deodorant. CNA13 then provided perineal care to the front and used a towel to wash his legs. CNA13 removed the first layer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY NJ #165993 Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, in accordance with federal guidelines for 2 of 35 residents, Resident #200 and #655 reviewed for accuracy for MDS coding. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 4/02/24 at 09:33 AM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #200 in their room. Resident #200 stated they take an antidepressant medication and have for a few years. On 4/4/24 at 9:10 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #200's hybrid (paper and electronic) medical records. The admission Record (AR) documented the resident had diagnoses that included but were not limited to, adjustment disorder with depressed mood, schizoaffective disorder depressive type, bipolar disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. A review of a Annual MDS assessment, dated 1/22/24, indicated in Section N-Medications, under N0415. High-risk Drug…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,901 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,901 — penalty dated 2026-02-04

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ROSENBERG FAMILY — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 92% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ