No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Daughters Of Miriam Center For Nursing & Rehabilit

One David N Myers Parkway, Beachwood, OH 44122 · For profit - Corporation · 233 certified beds · (216) 360-9080 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (216) 360-9080 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citation (F0567)5 actual-harm citations
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • it has 5 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
25101 Chagrin Blvd · (216) 359-1734 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
24200 Chagrin Blvd · (216) 831-6466 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
24601 Chagrin Blvd · (216) 831-3535 · Call to confirm hours
Park
21400 Chagrin Blvd · (216) 491-1400 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
23711 Chagrin Blvd · (216) 647-4884

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.3%5.3%15.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.1%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms38.0%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.0%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.4%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.9%25.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine63.6%94.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.4%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.8%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.6%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.7%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine35.4%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.3%24.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.0%12.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.271.731.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.151.801.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 147 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

44.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
71.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 71.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 49 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF44.2%CMS range 34.3–50.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.1%CMS range 8.6–16.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge71.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge65.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge71.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.8%CMS range 3.6–9.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.28
RN hours/ resident / day
1.50
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.82
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.60
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.65
RN hoursweekends
54.2%
Total nursing turnover
37.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 233 beds and averages 140.2 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 93 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.28 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.82 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.12 on weekdays — 29% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.54 to 0.65 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

18
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-11-08)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2023-10-24)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of witness statements, review of facility incident investigation, review of the medical examiner report, review of the police report, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure timely injury identification and physician notification and treatment following a fall with fracture for Resident #162. Actual Harm occurred on [DATE] 4:30 P.M. when the facility failed to obtain timely and appropriate imaging (x-ray) for Resident #162 following a fall with injury resulting in a delay in treatment. Following the fall, the resident complained of increased pain, had swelling, an abrasion to the knee and was unable to stand. On [DATE] at 3:15 P.M a new order was written for an x-ray of the area. X-ray results on [DATE] at 9:15 P.M. were positive for a right femur fracture. However, facility staff did not locate the x-ray results until [DATE] at 4:00 A.M. at which time they failed to seek medical intervention/treatment for the resident. Resident #162 expired on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to assess Resident #163's wound and obtain appropriate treatment orders upon re-admission from the hospital and failed to complete pressure ulcer treatments as ordered by the physician or nurse practitioner to prevent a decline in the wound resulting in suspected osteomyelitis (serious bone infection). Actual Harm occurred on 10/02/24 when Resident #163's pressure ulcer progressed from a Stage III pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss, subcutaneous fat may be visible but bone, tendon or muscle are not exposed, slough may be present but does not obscure the depth of tissue loss, may include undermining and tunneling) measuring 1.5 centimeters (cm) by 2.0 cm with a depth of 0.1 cm to an unstageable pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered by slough (yellow, tan, gray, green or brown) and/or eschar (tan, brown or black) in the wound bed) with suspected osteomyelitis measuring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized fall prevention program to prevent falls, ensure falls were thoroughly investigated and/or ensure residents were safely transferred. Actual harm occurred on 10/03/24 at approximately 11:40 P.M. when Resident #19, who was cognitively impaired, was at high risk for falls and had a history of fall and required substantial or maximal staff assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs), sustained an unwitnessed fall that resulted in displaced fractures of the right seventh through 12th ribs and a non-displaced sternal fracture. Prior to the fall on 10/03/24, Resident #19 had a care planned intervention for staff to check on her between the hours of 10:00 P.M. and 12:00 A.M., due to a previous fall in the facility. However, there was no evidence in the medical record this intervention was monitored and/or being completed. Resident #19 was transferred to the hospital on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2020-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review and policy review the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision to prevent a fall with subsequent head injury for Resident #46 and failed to ensure a new intervention was added to prevent further injury related to Resident #84 banging her left hand on a transfer bar. Actual harm occurred on 02/24/20 when Resident #46, was left unsupervised in the dining room, and was found on the floor with her head in a pool of blood. Resident #46 sustained bruising and a 0.1 centimeter (cm) x 0.1 cm open area to the forehead for which she was sent to the hospital for treatment. This affected two of five residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 222. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, anxiety disorder, history of a fracture of the right femur, osteoporosis and altered mental status. Review of the comprehensive assessment (MDS 3.0) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2020-03-05 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and medical record review the facility failed to ensure consistent adequate staffing to meet the care needs of residents residing on the secured dementia unit. Actual harm occurred on 02/24/20 when Resident #46, was left unsupervised in the dining room, and was found on the floor with her head in a pool of blood. Resident #46 sustained bruising and a 0.1 centimeter (cm) x 0.1 cm open area to the forehead for which she was sent to the hospital for treatment. This affected one (Resident #46) of five residents reviewed for accidents and had the potential to affect 13 additional residents (Residents #18, #22, #31, #36, #47, #60, #71, #78, #84, #131, #149, #167 and #208) currently residing on the secured dementia unit. The facility census was 222. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, anxiety disorder, history of a fracture of the right femur, osteoporosis and altered mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident received his medical records in a timely manner. This affected one resident (Resident #75) our of three residents reviewed for medical record access. The facility census was 152. Findings include: Interview on 03/03/25 at 3:32 P.M. with Resident #75 revealed he requested his medical records and it took a while to receive them. Interview on 03/04/25 at 10:08 A.M. with Designated Social Worker (DSW) #431, with administrator present per her request, revealed Resident #75 provided her with a medical records request form on 02/04/25 and she contacted the case manager and scheduler to see who takes care of the request. DSW #431 couldn't remember what they said. Interview on 03/04/25 at 11:02 A.M. with Administrator verified the medical request form submitted by Resident #75 on 02/04/25 was not submitted to attorneys for approval until 02/24/25. Administrator reported they hired a new medical record staff person, Medical Records #383, who started on 02/03/25 and started her vacation on 02/04/24 and didn't' return…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #129 received proper incontinence care. This affected one resident (Resident #129) of three residents reviewed for incontinence. The facility census was 152. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #129 revealed an admission date of 03/14/24. Diagnosis included but were not limited to COVID-19, dysphagia, cirrhosis of Iver, nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, hemiplegia affecting right dominant side, and sickle-cell disease. Review of the Care Plan dated 12/10/24 revealed Resident #129 had bladder and bowel incontinence. Interventions included offer to toilet resident upon waking, before and after meals, at bedtime and as needed (PRN) and provide peri-care after each episode of incontinence. Review of the quarterly Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #129 had severely impaired cognition. Review of the bladder and bowel section revealed Resident #129 was always incontinent of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to secure and store medications appropriately. This affected one resident (Resident #136) out of three residents reviewed for secured medications. The facility census was 152. Findings include: Review of Resident #136 medical record revealed the following medications were due for administration the morning of 03/04/25: Amiodarone Hydrochloric Acid (HCI) 200 milligram (mg) give one by mouth (po) once a day (qd) for heart rate, Jardiance 25 mg give 1 tablet po for diabetes mellitus, Metoprolol Succinate extended release (ER) 24 hour 25 mg, give ½ tablet 12.5 mg PO qd for blood pressure, Potassium Chloride ER 20 milliequivalent (MEQ) give 1 tablet po qd for hypokalemia, sodium chloride oral tablet give 1 gram qd po for supplement, Vitamin C 500 mg give 1 tablet qd for anemia, and Acyclovir 400 mg give 1 tablet twice a day (BID) for prevention. Observation and interview on 03/04/25 at 11:52 A.M. with Resident #136 revealed a medicine cup on the overbed tray with 6 ½ pills in the cup.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #201's medical record accurately reflected confirmation of the resident's death. This affected one resident (Resident #201) out of three resident reviewed for death in the facility. The facility census was 152. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #201 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnosis including but not limited to malignant neoplasm of nasopharynx, respiratory failure, severe protein-calorie nutrition, congestive heart failure, history of transient ischemic attack (TIA), adult failure to thrive, tracheostomy status, gastrostomy, and mood affective disorder. Resident #201 expired at the facility on [DATE]. Review of the progress note dated [DATE] at 12:00 A.M. authored by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #579 revealed LPN #579 checked on Resident #210 and was unable to obtain vital signs. Resident #201 did not respond to verbal and tactile stimuli. Nursing supervisor was made aware,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #146, who was dependent on staff assistance for activities of daily living (ADL), received adequate and proper assistance for dressing, personal hygiene, and incontinence care. This affected one resident (#146) of three residents reviewed for ADL. The facility census was 166. Findings include: Review of Resident #146's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/22/24 and a reentry date of 01/26/24. Resident #146's diagnoses included bradycardia, type two diabetes mellitus, vascular dementia, moderate, with psychotic disturbance, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of Resident #146's care plan dated 01/22/24 included Resident #146 had an activity of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to urinary tract infection, Alzheimer's disease, bradycardia and incontinence. The goal developed was for Resident #146 to maintain, improve current level of function through the review date.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to implement adequate and necessary interventions to address Resident #146's constipation through implementation of the facility bowel protocol. This affected one resident (#146) of three residents reviewed for constipation. Findings include: Review of Resident #146's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/22/24 and a reentry date of 01/26/24. Resident #146's diagnoses included bradycardia, type two diabetes mellitus, vascular dementia, moderate, with psychotic disturbance, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of Resident #146's care plan dated 01/22/24 included Resident #146 had an activities of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to urinary tract infection, Alzheimer's disease, bradycardia and incontinence. The goal developed was for Resident #146 to maintain, improve current level of function through the review date. Interventions included Resident #146 required the staff assistance of one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-08 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure all menu items were prepared in advance and menus and/or substitutions were followed for resident meal service. This had the potential to affect all 159 residents receiving meals from the kitchen excluding the seven residents (#44, #46, #97, #110, #111, #137, and #315) the facility identified as receiving nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 166. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility menu for 10/30/24 lunch revealed the meal was to consist of tomato soup, grilled cheese on Texas toast, potato chips, oven roasted vegetables and banana cake. Review of the resident's menu extension sheets for 10/30/24 revealed residents on a regular and mechanical soft texture diet were to receive four ounces of an oven roasted vegetable, and residents on a puree texture diet should receive the equivalent of one pureed grilled cheese sandwich. Review of the recipe Grilled Swiss Cheese Sandwich, Puree undated, revealed the grilled cheese sandwich would be served with a four-ounce scoop. Observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and food committee meeting minutes review, the facility failed to ensure palatable and appealing meals were served. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving meals from the kitchen. The facility identified seven Residents (#44, #46, #97, #110, #111, #137, and #315) as receiving nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 166. Findings include: 1. Interview on 10/30/24 at 1:26 P.M. with Dietary Director (DD) #813 revealed he had identified an issue with meal timeliness and keeping good temperatures. DD #813 indicated it would be easier and faster to serve from the pantry on each unit. DD #813 indicated the new facility ownership had changed the process from serving from the pantry to serving from the main kitchen. Observation on 10/30/24 at 1:37 P.M. of a test tray with DD #813 and Dietary Manager (DM) #836 revealed the tray was served to the last unit identified as [NAME] Two. All resident trays were passed prior to taking temperatures. The temperatures were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure meals were served in a timely manner. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving meals from the kitchen. The facility identified seven Residents (#44, #46, #97, #110, #111, #137, and #315) as receiving nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 166. Findings include: Review of the facility meal times revised on 04/10/24 revealed breakfast was served from 7:45 A.M. to 8:55 A.M., lunch was served from 11:45 A.M. to 12:50 P.M., and dinner was served from 5:00 P.M. to 6:00 P.M. The identified order of serving was first [NAME] One Unit, [NAME] Unit, [NAME] Three Unit, [NAME] Two Unit, and last [NAME] Two Unit. It was noted meal times were based on census and may deviate 15 minutes from scheduled time. Review of Food Committee Meeting Minutes dated 07/16/24 revealed meal times were reviewed and the committee discussed reasons for delays in meal delivery. Review of Food Committee Meeting Minutes dated 08/16/24 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff followed appropriate food safety and handling techniques including equipment cleaning and sanitation, glove use, handwashing, hairnet use. This had the potential to affect all 159 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. The facility identified seven residents (#44, #46, #97, #110, #111, #137, and #315) as receiving nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 166. Findings include: Observation on 10/30/24 at 8:51 A.M. revealed Mashgiach #837 (a person in the Judaism religion who supervises the kosher status of a food establishment) in the kitchen area. Mashgiach #837 was not wearing a hair net. Dietary Director (DD) #813 asked Mashgiach #837 to wear a hair net and Mashgiach refused and stated she was wearing a wig, so she does not need to. Observation on 10/30/24 at 10:19 A.M. to 10:55 A.M. of [NAME] #684 preparing pureed cake revealed [NAME] #684 adjusted his beard net with gloved hands and did not change gloves or wash hands. [NAME] #684 used the food processor and a rubber…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 33 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a dignified dining experience for Resident #62, Resident #13, Resident #52 and Resident #24. This affected four residents (#62, #13, #52 and #24) out of 12 residents observed eating their meals in the secured unit dining room. The facility census was 166. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #62 was admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including severe dementia with behaviors, hemiplegia (one sided paralysis) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side) following a cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting the left non-dominant side, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and osteoarthritis. Resident #62 had medical conditions including weakness with abnormal gait and mobility, used a wheelchair for mobility, and needed assistance with personal care. A review of the Resident #62's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] indicated she was rarely or never understood. A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-08 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and recipe review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate puree preparation techniques were followed. This had the potential to affect 17 Residents (#17, #37, #42, #53, #62, #63, #74, #79, #80, #86, #88, #98, #105, #106, #113, #132, and #326) the facility identified as requiring a puree textured diet. The facility census was 166. Findings include: Observation on 10/30/24 from 10:19 A.M. to 10:55 A.M. of puree preparation by [NAME] #684 revealed preparation of puree cake, Brussels sprouts, sweet potatoes, and tomato soup. Dietary Director (DD) #813 and Dietary Manager (DM) #836 were also present for observation. [NAME] #684 did not refer to any recipes or diet manual during the preparation. [NAME] #684 indicated he was looking for a pudding like consistency. [NAME] #684 was noted to add large amounts of water and thickener (a powdered substance used to alter the texture of foods and beverages to allow for safe swallowing) to the Brussels sprouts, sweet potatoes, and tomato soup. After completing the puree preparation [NAME] #684 was observed to add…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record reivew, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified in a timely manner for a change in condition for Resident #162 and for Resident #126. This affected two Residents (#126 and #162) of two reviewed for notification of change. The facility census was 166. Findings include: 1. Review of the closed medical record for Resident #162 revealed an admission date of [DATE] and discharge date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), malignant neoplasm of bronchus or lung, atherosclerotic heart disease, essential hypertension, generalized muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, repeated falls, and history of fractures including right femur, left tibia, T9-T10 (thoracic spine) vertebra, and right clavicle. Review of the plan of care initiated on [DATE] revealed Resident #162 was at risk for falls related to history of falls with fracture and weakness. Interventions included Dycem…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview with staff the facility failed to follow-up with grievances involving Resident #167 in a timely manner. This affected one resident (#167) of three residents reviewed for grievances. The census was 166. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #167 revealed an admission date of 12/16/19 and a discharge date of 01/19/24. Diagnoses included heart failure, dysphagia and dementia without behavioral disturbance. Review of the concern log revealed an entry on 01/04/24 from the family of Resident #167 regarding issues including missing dentures and request for medical records. The notes indicated the team met with the family regarding concerns and gave a consent to be seen by the dentist for replacement dentures. It stated the Administrator discussed replacement options. Review of the email dated 01/08/24 at 1:30 P.M. from the son to the Administrator revealed the son typed he had left five voicemails in the past ten days for Medical Records department. He was asking for a response by the next day. Review of the email dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #62, Resident #108 and Resident #79 were assisted with eating their meal. This affected three residents (#62, #108 and #79) out of seven residents reviewed for activity of daily living (ADL) assistance. The facility census was 166. Findings include: 1. Resident #62 was admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including severe dementia with behaviors, hemiplegia (one sided paralysis) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side) following a cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting the left non-dominant side, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), osteoarthritis, and hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol). Resident #62 had medical conditions including weakness with abnormal gait and mobility, used a wheelchair for mobility, and needed assistance with personal care. A review of the Resident #62's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] indicated she was rarely or never understood. Resident #62's physician order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the medical record, the facility failed to ensure residents received prescribed treatments or application of appliances as prescribed to maintain or prevent a decline in range of motion (ROM). This affected one resident (Resident #27) of one resident reviewed for ROM/mobility. The facility census was 166. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 01/07/24 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), depression, primary hypertension, osteoarthritis, muscle weakness, pain in left shoulder, and hemiplegia or hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed on 10/13/24 revealed Resident #27 had intact cognition and no behaviors or rejection of care. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #27 had impaired range of motion (ROM) on one side of her upper and lower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and services were in place for Resident #111's enteral feeding tube. This affected one resident (Resident #111) of one reviewed for tube feeding concerns. The facility identified eleven residents ( #46, #63, #66, #79, #97, #98, #110, #111, #128, #137, and #148) who received enteral tube feedings. The facility census was 166. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #111 revealed an initial admission date of 12/20/23 and a facility re-entry date of 01/31/24. Diagnoses included hypertensive urgency, hematuria, altered mental status, benign prostatic hyperplasia, oropharyngeal phase dysphagia, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, unspecified dementia, pure red cell aplasia, vesicointestinal fistula, flaccid neuropathic bladder, stage three chronic kidney disease, acquired absence of the right and left leg above the knee, and attention to gastrostomy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide appropriate assessments and monitoring to ensure residents were free from complications before and after dialysis treatments. This affected three residents (Resident #50, Resident #126, and Resident #314) of three residents reviewed for dialysis. The facility identified three residents (#50, #126 and #314) as receiving dialysis. The facility census was 166. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #126 revealed an admission date of 08/15/24. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus type one, and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed on 10/08/24 revealed Resident #126 had intact cognition and required substantial to maximal assistance with chair to bed, toilet, and shower transfers. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #126 was on dialysis. Review of the physician orders revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure staff administered Resident #107's insulin as ordered by the physician. This affected one resident (#107) out of four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 166. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #107 was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, and long term use of insulin. Resident #107's physician order dated 09/23/24 indicated to administer 21 units of Insulin Glargine Solution 100 units per milliliter (u/ml) subcutaneously (SQ) one time a day for diabetes mellitus. There were no parameters for holding the insulin medication in the order. An observation on 10/29/24 at 8:25 A.M. of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #763 administering medications to Resident #107 revealed a failure to administer the Insulin Glargine Solution medication as ordered by the physician. The following medications were administered during the observation: Aspirin 81…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the facility's fall investigations, and interview, the facility failed to ensure documentation was complete and accurate for Resident #15, #19 and #50. This affected three residents (#15, #19, and #50) of 43 records reviewed. The facility census was 166. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 04/29/18 with diagnoses including age-related osteoporosis, presence of left artificial shoulder joint, major depressive disorder, presence of right artificial hip joint, hypothyroidism, and a history of falling. Review of the facility's fall investigation dated 10/03/24 at 11:40 P.M. revealed Resident #19 had an unwitnessed fall while self-ambulating, complained of six out of ten pain to the right side, was administered acetaminophen and an ice pack, and was sent to the hospital around 1:40 A.M. on 10/04/24, two hours after the fall occurred. There was no witness statement for Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #791, who wrote a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy and interview the facility failed to maintain infection control standards during care for Resident #107 during medication administration and Resident #111 during gastronomy tube site care. This affected one resident (#107) out of four residents reviewed for medications administration and one resident (#111) out of one resident reviewed for tube feeding. The facility census was 166. Findings include: 1. Resident #107 was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure, iron deficiency anemia, diabetes mellitus, high white blood cell count, lung cancer, Alzheimer's dementia, aortic valve stenosis, fractured right femur, high blood pressure, leiomyoma of uterus (uterine fibroids), vascular dementia, cerebral vascular disease with transient ischemic attack (TIA) and stroke, high cholesterol, lymphoma, and long term use of insulin. An observation 10/29/24 at 8:25 A.M. of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #763 administering medications to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in a secure location at all times. This had the potential to affect 40 residents (#1, #6, #7, #10, #12, #13, #15, #16, #19, #22, #24, #27, #30, #36, #37, #46, #51, #60, #62, #65, #67, #69, #77, #79, #85, #88, #91, #99, #103, #105, #106, #107, #110, #118, #119, #123, #130, #132, #147, and #148) residing on [NAME] three unit. The facility census was 150. Findings include: On 09/09/24 at 10:05 A.M., an observation of the [NAME] three unit revealed a medication cart was unattended and unlocked in the hallway between Resident #7's room and Resident #107's room. At the time of observation, there was one resident ambulating in the hallway with a walker and one family member present in the hallway. On 09/09/24 at 10:10 A.M., upon returning to the medication cart, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #700 confirmed the medication cart was left unattended and unlocked in the hallway. LPN #700 further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations, and interview the facility failed to maintain standard infection control protocol when administrating medications. This affected one (Resident #137) of one resident reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #137 revealed an admission date of 07/17/24. Diagnoses included acute kidney failure, spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. The resident had impaired cognition. A random observation on 09/09/24 at 9:31 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 515 administering medications for Resident #137. LPN #515 placed three of 13 medications from medication cards into her bare hand. Interview during observations LPN#515 stated medications should be placed into the medication cup, not a bare hand. Review of the facility policy titled Administering Oral Medications, dated 2010 revealed staff were directed not to touch medications with their hands and to place all medications into a medication cup.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to provide wound treatment according to physician orders. This affected one (#67) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 161. Findings Include: Review of Resident #67's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/01/22. Diagnoses included hemiplegia, right heart failure, and unspecified malnutrition. Review of a wound physician assessment, dated 01/03/24, revealed Resident #67 had moisture associated skin damage (MASD) to the buttocks, which had improved since its development on 12/27/23, and measured 3 centimeters (cm) by 1.5 cm with a depth of 0.2 cm. The assessment called for a treatment of honey alginate (a mesh dressing mixed with honey gel) covered by a foam dressing to be changed daily. Review of a physician order dated 12/27/23 confirmed there was an active order in place for this treatment. Observation of wound care for Resident #67 by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #501 on 01/09/24 at 10:45 A.M. revealed she performed the dressing care by washing the wound with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, staff interview and review of a fall investigation, the facility failed to provide appropriate monitoring during personal care to prevent a fall. This affected one (#114) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 161. Findings Include: Review of Resident #114's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included encephalopathy, chronic kidney disease, and unspecified dementia. Resident #114 was admitted to hospice on [DATE] and expired in the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #114 was severely cognitively impaired, was dependent on staff for toileting assistance, and needed substantial assistance with turning in bed. Review of a plan of care focus area, revised [DATE], revealed Resident #114 had an activities of daily living (ADLs) self-performance deficit related to impaired mobility. Interventions included extensive one to two person staff assistance with bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, facility policy review and interview the facility failed to ensure all food items were properly stored and served in a manner to prevent contamination, spoilage and/or food borne illness. This had the potential to affect 141 of 141 residents who received meal trays from the kitchen. The facility identified one resident (#108) who received nothing by mouth (NPO status). The facility census was 142. Findings include: 1. On 10/16/23 at 9:30 A.M. an initial tour of kitchen was conducted with Dietary General Manager (DGM) #944. There were seven half-gallon containers of whole milk noted in the dairy refrigerator that had a sell by date of 10/09/23. There were four large dry storage bins containing potato flakes, sugar, flour and breadcrumbs. Each bin had a scoop inside of it. On 10/16/23 at 9:50 A.M. DGM #944 verified the sell by date on the seven half gallons of whole milk was 10/09/23. DGM #944 also verified the scoops inside of the storage bins containing potato flakes, sugar, flour and breadcrumbs. Review of the policy titled Food Storage dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility policy, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure all residents were treated with dignity and respect. This affected four residents (#49, #52, #255 and #268) of 142 residents observed for right to dignity and respect. The facility census was 142. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #255 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including encephalopathy, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and urinary tract infection. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #255 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9 indicating short-term and long-term cognition impairment. Resident #255 was dependent to maximal assistance by staff for activities of daily living (ADL). Review of the care plan dated 10/18/23 revealed Resident #255 had an ADL self-care performance deficit and had incontinence of bowel and bladder. Interventions included to maintain and/or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the failed to ensure meals were served at a palatable temperature. This had the potential to affect 39 residents (#8, #12, #19, #21, #23, #27, #28, #29, #31, #31, #34, #35, #36, #39, #45, #46, #53, #69, #72, #77, #81, #82, #84, #86, #88, #89, #90, #97, #98, #100, #102, #104, #109, #114, #117, #123, #125, #128, and #129) of 39 residents who resided on unit MY2 on the second floor. The facility census was 142. Findings include: Observation of a test tray on 10/18/23 at 6:12 P.M. of the dinner meal with Dietary Manager (DM) #969 revealed the temperature of the salisbury steak was 116.2 degrees Fahrenheit (F), mashed potatoes was 112.6 degrees F, mixed vegetables was 107.3 degrees F, and the chicken barley soup was 145.4 degrees F. The Salisbury steak, mashed potatoes, and mixed veggies tasted very good but was cold to taste. During the observation DM #969 declined to taste the meal but verified the temperatures. Interviews on 10/18/23 between 6:23 P.M. and 6:27 P.M. with Residents #39 and #82 stated the meal was cold when they received it. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-24 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure meals were served in a timely manner according to the designated meal times for the facility. This had the potential to affect 39 residents (#8, #12, #19, #21, #23, #27, #28, #29, #31, #31, #34, #35, #36, #39, #45, #46, #53, #69, #72, #77, #81, #82, #84, #86, #88, #89, #90, #97, #98, #100, #102, #104, #109, #114, #117, #123, #125, #128, and #129) of 39 residents who resided on unit MY2 on the second floor. The facility census was 142. Findings include: Review of the mealtimes revealed breakfast was at 8:30 A.M., lunch 12:30 P.M., and dinner 5:30 P.M. Observation on 10/16/23 at 1:06 P.M. revealed lunch trays were still being plated in a common kitchen for delivery to the resident rooms on the second floor MY2 unit. Observation on 10/17/23 at 9:47 A.M. of breakfast trays for the second floor MY2 unit resident rooms revealed trays were still being delivered and Resident #35, who was not interviewable, did not get her tray until 9:47 A.M. Interview on 10/18/23 at 10:46 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #944…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, facility policy review, review of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Considerations for Preventing Spread of COVID-19, and interview the facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices/procedures to prevent the spread of infection including COVID-19. This had the potential to affect eight residents (#17, #64, #80, #136, #259, #262, #263 and #265) who resided on the same unit as Resident #261 who was in isolation for COVID-19. The facility census was 142. Findings include: Review of Resident #261's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/13/23. Diagnoses included COVID-19 and lung cancer. Review of the current physician orders for October 2023 revealed Resident #261 was on isolation precautions for all care and services related to being positive for COVID-19. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/13/23, revealed the assessment was in progress. Review of the care plan dated 10/15/23 revealed no interventions related to COVID-19. Observation on 10/17/23 at 7:01 A.M. revealed State Tested Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-24 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to obtain signed authorization with a witness not connected to the facility to open resident accounts. This affected two residents (#36 and #121) of five residents reviewed for personal resident fund accounts. The facility census was 142. Findings include: On 10/23/23 at 1:30 PM a review of personal resident funds was conducted with Resident Banker (RB) #763 and the Administrator. Review of the personal resident fund account for Resident #36 revealed a balance of $1737.34. There was not an authorization for the facility to open and manage resident funds. This was verified by an interview with RB #763 and the Administrator at the time of the review. Review of the personal resident fund account for Resident #121 revealed a balance of negative $46.00. There was not an authorization for the facility to open and manage resident funds. This was verified by an interview with RB #763 and the Administrator at the time of the review.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate care plans had been established for Resident #11. This affected one resident (#11) of 29 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 142. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #11 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's Disease with late onset dementia, anemia, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, age-related osteoporosis, depression, hypothyroidism, osteogenesis, presence of urogenital implants, history of COVID-19, and retention of urine. Review of Resident #11's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 had intact cognition and had a foley catheter for bladder elimination. Review of Resident #11's care plan dated 09/12/23 did not include foley catheter care. Review of physician orders for October 2023 revealed no orders for foley catheter care. Interview on 10/24/23 at 10:26 A.M. with the Director of Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy review and interview the facility failed to administer insulin per physician order and complete blood sugar testing related to the administration of insulin for Resident #66. This affected one resident (#66) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. In addition, based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate care and treatment of a burn-related wound for Resident #90. This affected one resident (#90) of five residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 142. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #66 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis including type two diabetes mellitus (DM). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment date 10/02/23 revealed Resident #66 had intact cognition. Review of the physician orders dated October 2023 revealed an order for glargine subcutaneous (SQ) solution pen-injector 100 unit/Milliliter (U/ml) (Insulin Glargine) inject 12…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review and interview the facility failed to provide adequate care and services to identify, assess and/or provide treatments to promote healing of a pressure ulcer for Resident #19 and Resident #99. This affected two residents (#19 and #99) of five residents reviewed for wound care and/or pressure ulcers. The facility census was 142. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #19's medical records revealed an admission date of 03/11/22. Diagnoses included stage four pressure ulcer ( full thickness loss of tissue exposing bone, muscle or tendon) of the sacrum (tailbone), muscle weakness, and difficulty walking. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 had impaired cognition. Resident #19 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, toileting and personal hygiene and total dependence for transfers. Review of progress notes dated 08/26/23 to 08/27/23 revealed Resident #19 was identified as having an open area to the coccyx,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to utilize proper transfer technique for Resident #258 and Resident #19, and failed to ensure fall interventions were implemented to mitigate fall risks for Resident #126. This affected three residents (#258, #19 and #126) of four residents reviewed for accidents/hazards. The facility census was 142. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #258 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur, muscle weakness, and difficulty in walking. Review of the Five day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating she was alert ad oriented to person, place, and time. Resident #258 was maximal assist for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of the care plan dated 10/05/23 revealed Resident #258 had an ADL self-care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review and interview the facility failed to timely collect a urine specimen for suspicion of a urinary tract infection for Resident #19 and failed to ensure physician's orders were in place for Foley catheter care for Resident #11. This affected two residents (#11 and #19) of three residents reviewed for Foley catheter care. The facility census was 142. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #19's medical records revealed an admission date of 03/11/22. Diagnoses included neuromuscular bladder, difficulty walking and muscle weakness. Review of the care plan dated 09/28/23 revealed Resident #19 was on antibiotic therapy related to frequent urinary tract infections. Interventions included administer antibiotics as ordered. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 had impaired cognition. Resident #19 required extensive assistance with toileting and personal hygiene. Resident #19 was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure medications were not left unattended at the residents bedside. This affected three residents (#69, #84 and #129) of 142 residents observed for medication storage. The facility census was 142. Findings include: 1. Observation on 10/17/23 at 8:38 A.M. revealed Resident #129 was in bed in her room with a medication cup containing one white pill and one brownish colored pill, a medication cup with an orange colored liquid medication, a medication cup with a red colored liquid medication and a medication cup with a clear liquid medication. Resident #129 was not interviewable. 2. Observation on 10/17/23 at 8:40 A.M. revealed Resident #84 was in his room standing next to his bedside table and Resident #84 had a medication cup with several medications inside. Upon entering Resident #84's room Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #959 entered and stated Resident #84 knows to take his meds, I was just coming back to check if he did. 3. Observation on 10/17/23 at 8:43 A.M. revealed Resident #69 was sleeping in bed, he had a medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-24 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure adaptive equipment was provided with meals. This affected one resident (#40) of five residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 142. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 09/30/21. Diagnoses included dysphagia, muscle weakness, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a stroke affecting the left non-dominant side. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #40 had intact cognition. Review of the physician orders for October 2023 revealed the resident had a diet order for regular diet, pureed texture, and regular (thin) consistency diet. Review of the plan of care revised on 09/12/23 for nutrition revealed the resident received a mechanical altered diet due to dysphagia and received built-up utensils. Observation on 10/16/23 at 1:11 P.M. of Resident #40 in bed eating lunch revealed the resident's tray ticket read…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-03-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure food was served in a sanitary manner. This affected three residents (#39, #49, and #276) in the small dining room on the 100 unit and had the potential to affect 52 residents (Residents #1, #39, #40, #49, #50, #80, #81, #82, #114, #135, #136, #144, #145, #151, #164, #166, #178, #180, #182, #185, #190, #194,#195, #212, #214, #215, #216, #220, #274, #275, #276, #277, #278, #279, #280, #281, #282, #283, #284, #285, #286, #287, #288, #289, #290, #291, #292, #293, #294, #296, #297, and #298) currently residing on the first floor. The facility census was 244. Findings include: 1. Observation on 03/02/20 at 12:35 P.M. of the noon meal in the small dining room on the 100 unit revealed the tray line server, Dietary Aide (DA) #250, dropped an empty package from a sanitizer wipe he'd used to clean the thermometer onto the floor. With his gloved hands, he picked it up and put it the trash can. His hand made contact with the swinging trash lid. DA #250 then went back to the steam table and grabbed a dessert bowl. He was instructed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-03-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #92's call light was within reach. This affected one of 36 sampled residents. The facility census was 222. Findings include: Review of the record revealed Resident #92 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, anxiety disorder, and depressive disorder. The care plan for falls dated 03/09/17 indicated the resident had interventions including non-skid socks when up out of bed, restorative referral, lay resident down after meals, and be sure the resident's call light is within reach and encourage her to use it for assistance. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #92 had severe cognitive deficits with short and long-term memory impairments. The resident had no behaviors, no refusal of care, and required extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, toilet use, and locomotion on the unit. On 03/02/20 at 11:00 A.M., an observation revealed Resident #92 was lying in bed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-03-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure interventions were in place for Resident #219's pressure ulcers as ordered. This affected one of seven residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Residents #35, #41, #78, #170, #190, #200, and #219). The facility identified 16 residents as having pressure ulcers. Finding include: Review of the record revealed Resident #219 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, chronic peripheral venous insufficiency, and rheumatoid arthritis. The quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] indicated she had severe cognitive deficits and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and walking. Review of the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk dated 10/03/19 indicated she was at high risk for the development of pressure sores. Review of a progress note dated 11/15/19 indicated the nurse observed Resident #219 to have purplish-black colored area to both heels. The resident reported the areas were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy on hand hygiene the facility failed to ensure staff washed or cleansed their hands between the dirty and clean phases of dressing changes to prevent potential cross-contamination. This affected three (Residents #34, #170, and #219) of four residents observed for dressing changes (Residents #34, #42, #170, and #219). The facility census was 222. Findings include: 1. Review of the record revealed Resident #219 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, chronic peripheral venous insufficiency, and rheumatoid arthritis. Review of a progress note dated 11/15/19 indicated the nurse observed Resident #219 to have purplish-black colored area to both heels. The resident reported the areas were slightly painful. On 11/15/19, the nurse practitioner ordered to cleanse bilateral heels with normal saline, apply ABD pad, and wrap with Kerlix daily and prn (as needed). On 02/19/20, the wound care consultant changed the treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-09-11 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to have daily staffing information posted in a prominent place on 09/05/24. This had the potential to affect all 150 residents in the facility. Findings include: On 09/05/24 at 10:45 A.M., observation of the facility revealed there was no daily staffing information available for that day. On 09/05/24 at 10:53 A.M., interview with the Administrator stated the daily staffing information should be in a binder at the front desk. The Administrator verified the daily staffing information for 09/05/24 was not available at the front desk and was currently being printed.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ROSENBERG FAMILY — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 53.9+1.1 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.0+1.0 vs chain
The other 15 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ROSENBERG, AVRAHAMIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 12/19/2023
ROSENBERG, ZVIIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 12/19/2023
27080 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/19/2023
LESHER, ELIZABETHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/19/2023
TAMASKAR, RANJITIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/19/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-54.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 12%Medicare 4%Other / private 84%

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$417per resident / day
operating cost
$12,684per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$270per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365046. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-11-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next