Ivy Hill Post Acute Nursing & Rehabilitation LLC
1401 Ivy Hill Road, Philadelphia, PA 19150 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 145 certified beds · (215) 233-5605 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568, F0569)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.7% | 16.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.8% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.8% | 0.7% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.3% | 10.8% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.6% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.2% | 17.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.2% | 20.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.2% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 9.7% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 29.5% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.1% | 17.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.3% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 30.4% | 68.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.5% | 22.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.1% | 9.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.66 | 1.62 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.79 | 1.18 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 67 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 58.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 58 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.1%CMS range 36.1–62.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.0%CMS range 6.8–13.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 58.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 55.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 50.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 34.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.0%CMS range 4.0–11.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.80 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 145 beds and averages 139.8 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.84 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.58 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.95 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
45 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an antianxiety medication was available for administration for 1 of 8 residents reviewed (Resident R1).Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Medication Administration undated states, Licensed nursing professionals will administer medications according to times of administration determined by the facility. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnosis: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (a progressive, treatable lung disease that causes obstructed airflow, making breathing difficult), Depression (common, serious mood disorder characterized by persistent sadness, loss of interest in activities), Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance (a decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life, resulting from abnormal brain changes that damage cells and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-12 · tag F0577 — patternAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of the observations, and an interview with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the most recent Department of Health Survey results were readily accessible to residents and visitors in three of three nursing floors.Findings include: On 03/10/2026 at 10:42 a.m., a Resident Council meeting was conducted with five alert and oriented residents (R46, R174, R93, R119, and R131). During the meeting, residents reported that the facility does have a sign at the front desk stating, Survey results are available upon request, but the survey binder itself is not readily accessible and must be requested. On 05/13/2025 at 11:52 a.m., a facility tour was conducted with the Administrator, Employee E1, to observe the placement of the Department of Health Survey binder. Employee E1 reported that the survey binder is located only on the first floor and is available upon request. During observation, a sleeve displaying the sign Survey results are available upon request was noted; however, it was not positioned at a wheelchair-accessible level.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean linen, safe, comfortable, and homelike environment in two of the three nursing units observed (3th and 2nd floor Nursing Units).Findings include: On 03/09/2026 at 9:00 a.m., the front door was observed to stick to the floor, preventing it from opening and closing properly. The facility's receptionist, Employee E7, confirmed the door was broken and required force to operate. On 03/09/2026 at 10:08 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident R110. The resident reported that the facility does not have enough clean linens and towels available. During the observation, a brown spot was noted on the wall near the railing outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. The resident stated that housekeeping staff had been notified; however, according to the resident, the area had not been cleaned for several months. On 03/09/2026 at 1:00 PM, an interview was conducted with Resident R72 who reported that his dresser…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, review of facility policy, interview with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's advance directives were accurately documented in resident's clinical record for one of 28 residents reviewed. (Resident R110)Findings include: Review of facility policy ADVANCED MEDICAL DIRECTIVES revealed that section POLICY: Ivy Hill Post Acute and Rehabilitation Center conforms to all applicable laws and regulations. Although no resident will be compelled to designate a surrogate for purposes of establishing an advanced medical directive, all residents will be informed of these options and given the opportunity to make these arrangements at the time of admission to the facility. All professional staff at the facility will be instructed on the recording of advanced directives in resident records. This process will be incorporated into a system of ongoing psychosocial support for residents around issues of illnesses, incapacity, and death and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a discharge MDS assessment for 2 of 28 residents reviewed (Resident R65, R76).Findings include: Review for Resident R65 MDS (Minimum Data Set) quarterly assessments revealed that the MDS assessment was initiated on November 1, 2025, and completed on November 14, 2025. A clinical record review for Resident R76 revealed that the resident resident's MDS (Minimum Data Set) quarterly assessments revealed that a quarterly MDS assessment was initiated on, October 31, 2025, and completed on November 14, 2025. On March 11, 2026, at 10:25 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Registered Nurse in Extended Care (RNEC), Employee E6 who is responsible for initiating, reviewing, and validating MDS assessments. The RNEC confirmed that the quarterly MDS assessments for Resident R65 and Resident R76 was not completed within the required 7-day timeframe due to a high turnover rate of staff. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1) Nursing services
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to incorporate the recommendations from the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level II determination and the PASRR evaluation report into a resident's assessment, care planning, and transitions of care for one of 10 residents reviewed (Resident 27) Findings include:Review of Resident 27's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including schizophrenia, (mental health disorder that changes how you think, feel and act) legal blindness (severe vision loss meeting legal criteria, and atrophy (wasting or shrinkage of body tissue, organs or body parts). Review of the PASARR screening dated July 16, 2024, revealed that the resident required a Level II evaluation. Documentation indicated the resident and/or representative was to be notified of the need for further evaluation. Review of a determination letter dated July 18, 2023, revealed Resident 27…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a communication board was available or one of one resident reviewed who spoke a language other than English (Resident R3). Findings Include: A review of Resident R3's clinical record revealed an admission date of February 29, 2012. Review of the resident's comprehensive care plan, dated August 30, 2023, indicated: Communication device: [NAME] communication board at the bedside at all times. A review of Resident R3's clinical record did not indicate the language the resident spoke. Observation conducted on March 9, 2026, at 10:36 a.m., revealed that Resident R3 was unable to speak English. When asked what language the resident spoke, the resident stated Mandarin, Cambodian. When asked if (he/she) had any concerns, Resident R3 began speaking in another language. There was no evidence that an interpreter line or the communication board available in resident's room. Interview with Licensed Nurse, Employee E9, conducted on March 11, 2026, at 12:55 p.m. revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain treatment orders for one of four residents reviewed with skin impairment. (Resident R145)Findings include: Review of Resident R145's clinical record revealed that Resident R145 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis of but not limited to Cerebral Infarction and Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage (brain bleed). Review of Resident R145's Wound Evaluation and Management Summary dated March 4, 2026, revealed a Focused Wound Exam (Site 4), STAGE 3 PRESSURE WOUND OF THE LEFT, DORSAL FOOT PARTIAL THICKNESS Wound Size (L x W x D): 1.5 x 0.5 x 0.1 cm, Care goal(s) this month: Decrease Wound Area, Maintain Skin Integrity, Prevent Infection, DRESSING TREATMENT PLAN Primary Dressing(s): Skin prep apply once daily and as needed: if saturated, soiled, or dislodged. For 9 days. Review of resident R145's physician orders revealed no treatment order for Resident R145's wound on the dorsal area…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on direct observation, clinical record review, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure enteral feedings were administered and monitored according to professional standards of practice, specifically related to labeling, for one of one resident reviewed for tube feeding (Resident R135).Findings include: A review of the clinical record for Resident R135 indicated that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke), muscle wasting, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and hypertension (high blood pressure). A review of the physician's order for Resident R135, dated February 3, 2026, indicated an enteral feeding order as follows: Glucerna 1.5 at a rate of 60 mL/hour via PEG tube, up at 5:00 p.m., down at 3:00 p.m., for a total volume of 1300 mL, total calories 1980 kcal. On March 9, 2026, at 10:17 a.m., an observation was conducted with Licensed Nurse, Employee E9. revealed that Resident R135 was in bed receiving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of the manufacturer's recommendations, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the medications were properly dated when opened for one of two medication rooms (Unit 2). Findings include: Review of manufacturer's recommendations for Tubersol (medication used for tuberculosis testing) revealed when a vial of Tubersol is opened it should be discarded after 30 days. Observation of the refrigerator on Unit 2 medication room on March 09, 2026 at approximately 10:25 a.m. revealed an open vial of Tubersol that did not have an open date, therefore staff was unable to determine the discard date. During an interview at the time of the observation, Licensed Practical Nurse, Employee E12, confirmed that the Tubersol did not have an open date and that it should have been dated upon opening to ensure it could be properly discarded after 30 days. 28 Pa. Code 211.9(a)(1) Pharmacy services 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services
Show the remaining 35 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0801 — isolatedEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews and a review of employee credentials, it was determined that the facility failed to employ a qualified director of food and nutrition services.Findings include: An interview on March 9, 2026, at 9:20 a.m. with Employee E3, Food Service Director (FSD), revealed that her responsibilities included oversight of ordering, receiving, storing, preparation and service of food. Further interview with the FSD confirmed that she was not a certified dietary manager (CDM); or a certified food manager (CFM); or had a national certification for food service management and safety from a national certifying body; or had an associate's or higher degree in food service management or hospitality from an accredited institution; and that she had not received frequently scheduled consultations from a qualified dietitian. A review of Employee E12's credentials revealed that Employee E12 did not meet the statutory qualifications of a director of food and nutrition services. During an interview on March 10, 2026, at 12:15 p.m. with Employee E1, the Nursing Home Administrator,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolatedConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility assessment and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the direct care staff and input from residents, resident representatives, and/or family members was included when conducting the facility assessment. Findings include: Review of the facility's facility assessment, dated July 28, 2025, revealed there was no indication that the facility involved direct care staff, input from residents, resident representatives, and/or family members. Interview with Employee E2, Director of Nursing, on March 12, 2026, at 10:20 a.m., confirmed there was no direct care staff, resident representatives, and/ or family members included in the facility assessment. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management28 Pa. Code 211.12(c)(d)(1) Nursing services
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate housekeeping and maintenance services to ensure a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for three of three nursing units observed (first floor, second floor, third floor). Findings include: On March 24, 2025, at 12:57 p.m., Unit Manager Employee E19 confirmed that Resident R37 in room [ROOM NUMBER]-2 did not have access to a locked drawer at his bedside to store his personal belongings. Resident R37 had filed a grievance on January 3, 2025, regarding the missing $80, which was not reimbursed, and had been promised a locked drawer to secure his personal items. Observation on March 25, 2025 at 11:44 a.m. in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed Resident R15 lying in bed in a fetal position. Interview with Resident R15 on March 25, 2025 at 11:45 a.m. revealed room [ROOM NUMBER] did not have a working heating unit. Resident R16 further stated the middle part of her bed was broken and she is unable to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations of care and services, interviews with residents and staff and reviews of policies and procedures, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that three of 38 residents were protected from inappropriate sexual behaviors from one resident. (Residents R63, R44, R82) Findings include: A review of the undated facility policy titled resident rights, abuse, neglect, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property revealed that it was the responsibility of the facility to prevent abuse, neglect, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property. All staff were responsible for reporting and investigating abuse including resident to resident abuse. All employees would be screened for convictions of abuse. Residents would be screened by the social worker for personal or family history of abuse. All employees, including management staff and volunteers would receive training upon orientation and annually about recognizing, reporting and prevention of abuse. The training was to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-28 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on reviews of personnel files and the Department of State documents, staff interviews and reviews of policies and procedures, it was determined that the facility failed to perform criminal history background checks for two of two volunteer files (Employees E10, and E11) reviewed and the facility failed to ensure residents were protected from abuse by implementing the established abuse policy (Residents R63 and R44). Findings include: A review of the undated facility policy titled resident rights, abuse, neglect, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property revealed that it was the responsibility of the facility to prevent abuse, neglect, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property. The policy indicated that all staff were responsible for reporting and investigating abuse including resident to resident abuse. The policy indicated that all employees would be screened for convictions of abuse. The nurse aide registry, licensing authorities and references would be referenced for each employee prior to hire. Residents would be screened by the social worker for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-28 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and interview with staff, it was revealed that the facility did not ensure revisions were made to the PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) application to include mental health diagnoses for 3 out of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident R108, R10, R90). Findings include: Review of Resident R108's PASRR completed on January 31, 2024, indicated that Resident R108 had no mental health diagnosis. Review of R108's clinical record revealed on May 2, 2024, obtained a mental disorder and on April 4, 2024, obtained an anxiety disorder. A review of Resident R10's PASRR completed on February 24, 2023, indicated that Resident R10 had a mental health condition of Schizophrenia (serious mental health condition that affects how people think, feel, and behave) , altered mental status. A review of the resident diagnosis revealed that Resident R10 also had mood disorder due to known physiological condition as of July 24, 2023. Clinical record review revealed Resident R90 had a mental diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder (mental health condition that causes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-28 · tag F0943 — patternGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on personnel record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide abuse, neglect and exploitation training for two of two volunteer staff reviewed (Employee E10, and E11). Findings: A review of the Facility Policy titled Residents/Patient Right-Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment or Misappropriation of Resident/Patient's Property undated, revelated All employees, including management staff and volunteers, will receive training upon orientation and annually. In-services regarding abuse, neglect, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident's/patient's property. Training will include how staff should report their knowledge of allegations without fear of reprisal; How to recognize signs of burnout, frustration and stress that may lead to abuse On March 26, 2025, at 2:04 p.m. an interview with Volunteer Pastor, Employee 10 revealed that he and his wife, Employee E11 had been coming to the facility for 22 years to conduct religious activities. On March 28, 2025, at 1:15 p.m. an interview with the Human Services Director, Employee E12 revealed that she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews with residents and staff and reviews of policies and procedures, it was determined that for one of two residents reviewed that the interdiciplinary care planning team failed to assess each resident for self adminitration of medications and determine if the practice was clinically appropriate and safe in accordance with their residents rights. (Resident R94) Findings include: A review of the undated facility policy titled self-medication administration revealed that it was each resident's right to manage their medications independently within the nursing home. The policy indicated that the facility was responsible for assessing each resident to deem if the resident was capable of safely managing their own medications. Clinical record review for Resident R94 revealed a quarterly comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] that indicated this resident was cognitively intact, had no swallowing problems with foods or fluids. The assessment also indicated that the resident had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the review of clinical records, facility documentation, facility policies, and interviews with resident and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to demonstrate evidence that a grivance was promptly documented and resolved for one of 26 resident records reviewed. (Resident R95) Findings Include: The facility will fully investigate and respond to all concerns or complaints regarding patient/resident care and/or treatment. The patient/resident/ resident representative has the right to file a grievance orally, in writing, or anonymously. All grievances will be responded to within 48-72 hours, and in writing if requested. On March 24, 2025, at 12:55 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident R37, who reported that $80 had gone missing in January 2025. The facility investigated the concern but did not issue a refund, stating that the amount was not documented on the resident's inventory sheet. Resident R37 also mentioned that the facility had promised to provide a locked drawer for storing his personal belongings. At 12:57 p.m. on the same day, Unit Manager…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to identify the placement of beds against the wall as a restraint, the use of a seatbelt on a wheelchair as a restraint, and did not assess the functional status of an individual resident to determine the appropriateness of using a restraint for two of the 26 residents reviewed (Resident R108 and Resident R26) Findings Include: Review of Resident R108's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility February 1, 2024, with a diagnosis of difficulty in walking, and encephalopathy (disease that affects the brain's structure or function). On March 24, 2025, at 12:52 p.m., Resident R108 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in the dining room with a seatbelt fastened across his waist. The seatbelt was locked, preventing the resident from being able to release it. This observation was confirmed by the unit manager, Employee 19, who reported that Resident R108 does not have an order for the use of a seatbelt restraint and expressed uncertainty as to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, facility documentation, review of clinical records, and interview with staff; it was determined the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan and interventions to address Resident R30's recent overdose, Resident R36's lack of toiling program and Resident R69's past traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) abd self administration of medication (Resident R94) for 4 of 26 residents reviewed. (Resident R30, R36, R69, R94) Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Interdisciplinary Care Planning Protocol undated, revealed Nursing admission Assessment completed on day of admission but in no event later than 24 hours of admission. Nursing Initiates interim Care Plan-the interim care plan must address all immediate care needs. Review of Resident R30's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis of other low back pain, opioid dependency, and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident R30's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident and staff interview, review of facility policy and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly supervise residents during medication administration for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident R57). Findings include: Review of Facilities' policy titled Administering medications reviewed January 18, 2025 revealed under section Policy Interpretations and Implementation stated only persons licensed or permitted by this state to prepare, administer and document the administration of medications may do so. Never leave a medication unattended in a resident's room. Residents may self-administer their own medications only if the Attending Physician, in conjunction with the Interdisciplinary Care Planning Team, has determined that they have the decision-making capacity to do so safely. Review of Resident R57's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility August 9, 2019 with a diagnosis of Traumatic Brain Injury, Hypokalemia (low potassium), and Hypertension (high blood pressure), Depression and Anxiety. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, interview with staff and review of policies, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was provided with devices to optimize posture during dining and failed to collect additional nutritional biochemical data related to the resident's nutritional status for one of five residents reviewed. (Resident R63) Findings include: A review of the undated policy titled nutrition evaluation indicated that it was the facility's responsibility to ensure that each resident received proper nutrition and dietary support to promote their health and well being. The policy also indicated that each resident would undergo a nutritoinal assessment by a registered dietitian. The dietitian was responsible for assessing the resident's medical history, dietary preferences, allergies and and special dietary needs. The dietitian would also be responsible for assessing biochemical data collected related to a resident's nutritional status. The facility would collaborate the healthcare professionals (physician, nursing, dietitian occupational…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility policy and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for one of one resident reviewed (Resident R23). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Oxygen Therapy, no date, revealed Oxygen (02) is administered appropriately to residents to improve oxygenation and provide comfort to residents experiencing respiratory difficulties. Oxygen is administered by licensed staff with a physicians order. In an emergency oxygen can be administered and order should be received as soon as possible. Clinical record review revealed Resident R23 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of sepsis (serious condition in which the body has a severe response to an infection), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung condition caused by damage to the airways that limit airflow), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Observation on March 24, 2025 at 11:28 a.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of clinical records, facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that pain level assessments were accurate for one of the 2 residents reviewed (Resident R30) . Findings include: Review of Resident R30's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis of other low back pain and opioid dependency. Review of Resident R30 physician's orders dated, December 13, 2024, revealed an order for pain assessment every shift for pain assessment. Continued review of December 2024 physician order revealed and order dated December 15, 2024, through March 8, 2025, for Oxycodone tablet 10 milligrams (mg) give 1 tablet every 6 hours for pain. Review of Resident R30's March 2025 physician orders confirmed and order date March 8, 2025 through March 19, 2025, for Oxycodone oral tablet 10 mg give 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours for pain. Continued review of physican orders revealed and ordered dated March 19, 2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide culturally competent, trauma informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice, accounting for the resident's past experience and preferences in order to eliminate and /or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for one of four residents reviewed. (Resident R 69) Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Trama Informed Care,revealed the facility ensures that residents who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for resident's experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident. Upon admission the facility will assess each resident to ensure they receive appropriate treatment and services. A questionnaire will be utilized for each resident by the social services department in order to identify any trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical record review, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medication regimens were followed by the facility in a timely manner for two of the five residents reviewed related to medication regimen reviews (Residents R30 and R61). Findings include: Review of Resident R30's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis with atherosclerotic heart diseases of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, and cerebral infarction (stroke). Continued review revealed that the resident received Atorvastatin Calcium Oral Table 80 milligrams give 1 tablet by mouth prescribed by the physician on December 13, 2024. A Pharmaceutical review of the Medication Regimen was conducted on December 23, 2024, and February 26, 2025 revealed a recommendation for Lipids suggested with 80 mg (milligrams) Atorvastatin. Review of Resident R30's clinical record revealed no documented evidience that a laboratory study…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on the review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that as needed anti-anxiety medication was limited to 14 days unless a documented rationale was provided for one of eight residents reviewed for medication administration regimen. (Resident R69) Findings include: Review of physician orders for Resident R 69 dated March 25, 2025, revealed that there an order for Lorazepam (Ativan-this medication is used to treat anxiety) 1 mg, to give every twelve hours PRN (as needed) for agitation, end date is indefinite. Review of clinical record for Resident R 9 revealed no evidence that the attending prescribing practitioner documented the rationale for use as needed anti-anxiety medication in the resident's clinical record and indicated the duration for the prn order. 28 Pa. Code 211.12 (d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing Services
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the clinical records, review of facility policies and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free of significant medication error for one of four residents reviewed for medication administration relating to prescribed route of medication administration. (Resident R 116) Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Administering medications revised January 18, 2025, revealed that medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner and in accordance with the physician order. The individual administering the medication must check the label to verify the right resident, for right medication, right dosage, right time, and rate route of administration before giving the medication. Review of Resident R116's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federal mandated assessment tool for all residents) dated December 27, 2024 revealed that Resident R116 was admitted into the facility July 12, 2024 with diagnoses including renal failure (kidney failure) and traumatic brain injury. Resident R116 is on a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility documentation, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise comprehensive person-centered plan of care in a timely manner, for one of 28 resident records reviewed (Residents R384). Findings include: Review of Resident R384's clinical records revealed an admission date of December 22, 2023. Review of Resident R384's clinical record revealed medical diagnosis of Meniere's Disease, (a rare inner ear condition that affects both balance and hearing), Malignant Neoplasm of Endometrium, (a type of cancer that begins as a growth of cells in the uterus, Hypertension, (high blood pressure), Muscle Weakness, Atrial Fibrillation,( an irregular and often rapid heart rate), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, (obstructed airflow from the lungs), Myocardial Infraction, (heart attack), Protein Calorie Malnutrition, Osteoarthritis, (tissue and parts of joints gradually deteriorate), Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations of care and services and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to assess communication needs and ensure that appropriate treatment and services were provided to maintain the ability to speak and understand the preferred language for one of two residents reviewed. (Resident R10) Findings include: Observations of Resident R10 at 11:15 a.m., on June 10, 2024 revealed that this resident was in need of assistance with bathing, dressing and grooming. Resident R10 was unable to articulate his needs for assistance with activities of daily living. Interview with the licensed nursing staff, Employee E6, at 12:00 noon on June 10, 2024 revealed that Resident R10 was speaking his native language of Cambodian that the nurse could not understand. Clinical record review revealed a care plan for Resident R10 that indicated this resident has a language barrier and communication problem. There were no care plan measures to provide an interpreter for assessment purposes of cognitive ability and quality of life enrichment for Resident R10. There was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, reveiw of physician's orders and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility to ensure that physician's order related to tube feeding was followed for one of twenty-eight residents reveiwed (Resident R14). Findings include: Review of Resident R14's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated June 9, 2024, for every 4 hours Bolus Feeding: Jevity 1.5 via PEG (percutaneus Gastroscopic Gastrostomy tube- a tube conneced to the stomach used to introduce liquid food into the stomach) , 237 ml bolus 6x/day, total volume 1422 ml per 24 hours. Further, a physican's order dated June 9, 2024 for NPO (nothing by mouth) was also in place. Observation conducted during tour of the second floor unit on June 10, 2024 at 9:37 am revealed that licensed nurse Employee E13 was administering a cream-colored liquid into Resident R14's peg tube using a large syringe. Further observation revealed that there was one cup of cream-colored liquid left on the overhead table which the Employee E13 was observed throwing out in the resident's toilet. Interview with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations of care and services, clinical record review, interviews with staff and reviews of policies and procedures. it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision for one of two residents reviewed. (Resident R10) Findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled vision services revealed that it was the responsibility of the staff at the facility to assist each resident with obtaining vision services. The policy also indicated that it was the responsibility of the staff to notify the vision services provider for the necessary vision care services for the residents. The policy indicated that broken or damaged glasses was considered an emergent problem and that the vision service provider would be notified immediately for timely repair services for the resident. Clinical record review revealed a comprehensive quarterly assessment (MDS-an assessment of care needs) dated April 21, 2024 for Resident R10. The assessment indicated that Resident R10 required the use of corrective lenses for adequate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident who exhibited new onset of decrease in functional abilities receive appropriate treatment and services to improve and prevent further deterioration for one of 28 was observed (Resident R 14). Findings include Observation of Resident R14 conducted during tour of the second-floor unit on May 10, 2024, at 10:42 am revealed that Resident was on his bed. Further, observation revealed that resident was not able to open right hand fully. Further, Resident R14's fingers remain in a in a flexed position when hands were open. interview with Resident R14 conducted at the time of the observation revealed that he doesn't have a splint and that he was not receiving PT (physical Therapy or OT (Occupational therapy) services. Review of resident R14 clinical record revealed that Resident R14 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of Resident R14's medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical review it was determined that the facility failed to monitor labs for one resident on fluid restrictions (Resident R75). Findings include: Review of Resident R75's clinical records revealed the resident was admitted into the facility on January 23, 2024, from the hospital. Resident R75's medical diagnosis include Guillain-Barre Syndrome (rare disorder in which immune system attacks nerves causing weakness, tingling and paralysis, and Myoneural Disorder (a rare autoimmune disorder that affects communication between nerves and muscles), Ataxic Gait (uncoordinated walking), Bipolar Disorder (disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs), Disorder of Lung, Osteoarthritis (a type of arthritis that occurs when flexible tissue at the ends of bones wears down, Spondylosis (age-related wear and tear of the spinal disks), Scoliosis (sideways curvature of the spine), Kyphosis (a forward rounding of the back), Anxiety, Ulcerative Colitis (inflamed digestive tract), Hallucinations, and Neuromuscular Dysfunction (disorder that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview with residents and staff, observations, and review of clinical records it was determined that facility failed to address and/or obtain necessary services for behavioral health care needs for one of 28 residents reviewed (Resident R82) Findings include: Review of Resident R82's clinical record revealed resident was admitted to facility with history of paranoid personality disorder, psychophysiological insomnia and major depressive disorder. Resident has been 302'd [involuntary admission to psychiatric unit] prior to admission for suicidal attempt. Interview with R82 on June 10th, 2024 at 12:30 PM, revealed that the resident has been seeking grief group support due to past trauma of loosing family members/friends. Resident tearful during interview and stated that she does not wish to self-harm, is not interested in pharmacological interventions, and has been asking for non-pharmacological support; specifically, grief support group, which has been helpful in the past because she wants to interact with peers who are able to relate to what she is feeling and is going…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observation, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals are stored and labeled in accordance with professional standards for two of two medication rooms observed (second floor and third floor medication rooms). Findings include: Review of facility Policy on storage of medications revealed that under section Policy Statement, the facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. Under section Policy Interpretation and Implementation #2. The nursing staff shall be responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe and sanitary manner. Observation of the second -floor medication room conducted on June 11, 2024, at 11:46 am with licensed nurse Employee E13 revealed that a treatment cart was inside the medication room. Observation of the treatment cart revealed an opened tube of Santyl Collagenase inside the treatment cart. Further, the opened tube of Santyl did not have a label with resident's name attached to it.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations of care and services, clinical record reviews, interviews with staff and policy and procedure reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide routine dental services from an outside resource to meet the dental needs for one of three residents reviewed. (Resident R36) Findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled dental services revealed that it was the responsibility of the staff to assist each resident with obtaining routine and emergency dental care. The policy indicated that the facility was responsible for identifying dental needs through assessment and that the resident would receive dental services from an outside provider. Observations of Resident R36 during the noon meal on July 10, 2024 revealed that this resident was refusing to eat his meal. Resident R36 said that the foods did not taste good. It was observed at 12: 30 p.m., on June 10, 2024 on the third floor nursing unit while Resident R36 was speaking, that this resident had obvious or likely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that proper infection control practices were observed related to tube feeding and medication administration for one of one tube feeding observation and one of five residents observed (R14 and R79). Findings include Observation conducted during tour of the second-floor unit on June 10, 2024, at 9:37 am revealed that licensed nurse Employee E13 was providing Resident R14 with tube feeding via bolus (A way to send formula through the feeding tube using a catheter syringe. Bolus feedings give large doses of formulas several times a day), further observation revealed that Employee E13, licensed staff, was wearing gloves on her right hand but was not wearing gloves on her left hand. Further, Employee E13 was using both hands to handle the feeding equipment, (large syringe, cups) Further observation revealed that the over bed table where the tube feeding equipment and the two cups of cream-colored liquid were placed were dirty and did not have any clean covering. Observation during medication preparation by licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations of the operations within the food and nutrition department, reviews of policies and procedures, interviews with staff, and reviews of the the chemical manufacturers guidelines, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain all mechanical dietary equipment in safe operating condition. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled dish machine dated June 21, 2023 revealed that the dietary staff were responsible for washing, rinsing and sanitizing all dishes, bowls, cups, mugs, utencils, pots and pans after each meal. According to the policy the dietary staff were to test the chlorine using a test strip to ensure 50 ppm was being dispensed into the machine during the final rinse phase of dish washing. Observations of the dish machine on June 10, 2024 revealed that the low temperature dish machine was not registering (using a chlorine test strip) any chemical sanitizer (hypochlorite) during the final rinse cycle for proper cleaning and sanitizing of the dishes, bowls, cups, mugs, utencils, pots and pans. The chemical was unavailable for use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a resident fund quarterly statement for one of two residents reviewed for personal funds. (Resident R2). Findings include: Facility policy titled Personal Funds undated revealed A copy of the quarterly statement will be submitted to the resident or the resident's designated representative (if resident is unable to comprehend or has requested that the statement be send to the representative ) on a quarterly basis/and or the request of the resident or designated representative. Review of Resident R2's clinical record revealed that resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Resident R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS- a periodic assessment of a resident's needs) dated August 3, 2023, indicated that the resident's BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) is severely cognitively impaired. On April 10, 2023, Resident R2 obtained a Power of Attorney (POA) to represent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and resident fund accounts, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a final accounting of funds within 30 days of transfer for one of two residents (Resident CR1). Findings include: Resident CR1's clinical record indicated that the residnet was discharged on June 5, 2023, to another nursing home facility. The billing statement showed that facility received Resident CR1's pension payment on June 30, 2023, of the amount of $2,383.56 and Social Security for the amount of $1,398.00. Facility charged the resident for 4 days of stay for the month of June of total $1,978.00; which equaled the balance to be reimbursed to the resident of $1,758.56. Facility reported insurance denial claims which resulted in delaying the reimbursement. Facility issued a reimbursement check of $1,758.00 to Resident CL1 on October 27, 2023. Which resulted in 4 months delay. The amount and the address was incorrect on the check and facility re-issued a check of $1,758.56 on November 3, 2023. During an interview on November 1, 2023, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interview with resident, resident's representative, and staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that proper referral was initiated to transfer resident to another facility for one of the two residents reviewed. (Resident R2) Findings include: Review of Resident R2's clinical record revealed that resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Resident R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS- a periodic assessment of a resident's needs) dated August 3, 2023, indicated that the resident's BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) is severely cognitively impaired. On April 10, 2023, Resident R2 obtained a Power of Attorney (POA) to represent support the resident of making decisions. A review of the clinical record conducted during the onsite visit revealed the first social service note which was documented on October 18, 2023, in regards to Resident R2 transfer progress revealed that Resident R2 reported I really don't want to be nowhere But…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-17 · tag F0559 — patternHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide written notice, including reason for the change, prior to moving a resident to another room, for four of 32 residents reviewed (Residents R86, R36, R16 and R4). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Room Change/Roommate Assignment dated December 1, 2022, revealed, Prior to changing a room or roommate assignment all parties involved in the change/assignment (e.g., residents and their representatives) will be given advance notice of such change . and will include the reason(s) for such change. Interview on August 14, 2023, at 12:27 p.m. Resident R4 stated that her room had been changed recently, that she was not given a choice or proper notice of the room change and that she did not like her room. Review of Resident R4's census information revealed that on May 26, 2023, the resident was moved from room [ROOM NUMBER]-2 to room [ROOM NUMBER]-2. Continued…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review and interview with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility did not maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment for two of three nursing units (First floor and Second floor). Findings include: Observations conducted on the First floor nursing unit on August 14, 2023, at 9:55 a.m. revealed a strong odor of cigarette smoke in the hall way near the entrance to the resident lounge, through which residents access the smoking area outside. Licensed nurse, Employee E14, stated [it]smells like smoke in this hall all the time, I try to keep the door closed. The door was noted to be near to the door of Resident R48, who had a tracheostomy and noted respiratory care needs. Observations conducted on the Second floor nursing unit on August 14, 2023, at 10:55 a.m. revealed a wet floor near the bed of Resident R3, which appeared to be coming from under the heating/air conditioning unit in the room. A fitted bed sheet and a blanket were under the unit. Resident R3 stated it's been like that for a while. A second wet area was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE ROSENBERG FAMILY — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
The other 15 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IVY HILL 2 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/17/2022 |
| 1401 IVY HILL 2 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/17/2021 |
| 1401 IVY HILL LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/17/2021 |
| STERN, SAMUEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/17/2021 |
| BEWLEY, JOSEPH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/21/2025 |
| LEWIS, STEVEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/17/2021 |
| ROSENBERG, AVRAHAM | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/02/2025 |
| ROSENBERG, ZVI | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/02/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $597K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395525. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.