Resorts at Beaufort

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 73.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 170 beds and averages 126.8 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 43 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.03 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.49 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.25 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 65% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to provide one-to-one (1:1) supervision as needed in accordance with Resident (R)1's fall prevention care plan and failed to recognize and address all potential accident hazards in the resident's environment for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for falls. Specifically, on 01/25/2025, approximately five to ten minutes after the resident was assisted into bed by staff, who placed a reclined geriatric chair along the side of the resident's bed, R1 was seen coming down the hallway yelling that their eye hurt, and the resident's right eye was noted to be redder and more irritated than their left eye. While in the hallway, the resident became too weak to support their weight and was lowered to the floor by a nurse for an assisted fall. During the early morning hours of 01/26/2025, it was noted that the resident cried out in pain when trying to move their neck, and the resident was sent to the hospital for further evaluation. Hospital records reflected that the resident had a history…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and document review, the facility failed to maintain the facility in good repair for resident areas. Specifically, there were side rails loose, rusty toilet seats, towel bar that was separated off the wall, walls in disrepair, cove molding missing, and spacing around air conditioner (AC) units. The facility's failure to repair the residents' environment has the potential to cause injuries to residents in two of three halls (A and C halls).Findings include:1.Observation and interview with the Maintenance Director (MD) of the C hall on 05/01/26 at 3:06 PM through 3:16 PM revealed the following:Room C01-D, a two-to-three-inch movement in the right side of the side rail. Room C08-W, the wall had three large gouged areas near the bedroom door. The MD stated I don't go in every room. The wall will get fixed when the Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) tell him. Room A17-P, rusty toilet seat with rusty handles on the toilet riser. The towel bar was lying on the floor. The MD stated, Therapy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to issue the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) for one resident (Resident (R)13) of three residents reviewed for SNF ABNs. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents receiving Medicare Part A benefits and continued to reside in the facility to make an informed decision on continuing the services. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Advanced Beneficiary Notices dated 01/08/26 revealed, It is the policy of this facility to provide timely notices regarding Medicare eligibility and coverage. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines:1. Social Services is the contact person for information regarding Medicare eligibility, coverage, and applying for benefits. A notice alerting residents/representatives of this contact person shall be posted conspicuously in the facility.2. The Social Services will provide Medicare information to residents/representatives upon request. The current CMS-approved version of the forms shall be used at the time of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's fingernails were kept clean and trimmed for one of one resident (Resident (R) 9) reviewed for activities of daily living of 33 sample residents. This failure had the potential to affect resident care including personal hygiene in the facility.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Nail Care dated 01/08/26 indicated, The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for the provision of care to a resident's nails for good grooming and health .3. Routine cleaning and inspection of nails will be provided during ADL care on an ongoing basis. 4. Routine nail care, to include trimming and filing, will be provided on a regular schedule. Nail care will be provided between scheduled occasions as the need arises. 5. Principles of nail care: a. Nails should be kept smooth to avoid skin injury. b. Only licensed nurses shall trim or file fingernails of residents with diabetes . 6.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's gastrostomy tube (G-tube) was patent by checking for placement prior to administering medications for one of four residents (Resident (R) 33) observed during medication administration. This failure had the potential to result in the resident not receiving the medication. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration via Enteral Tube, reviewed 01/08/26, provided by the facility, revealed Policy: It is the policy of this facility to ensure the safe and effective administration of medications via enteral feeding tubes by utilizing best practice guidelines . 11. Procedure: . h. Enteral tube placement must be verified prior to administering any fluids or medication .Review of R33's undated admission Record in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included multiple…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented the care plan for 1 (Resident (R)5) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for falls. Specifically, on 07/19/2025, a staff member attempted a bed-to-chair transfer for R5 with a mechanical lift, with only one staff member present. The mechanical lift malfunctioned, and the resident fell to the floor. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated 03/2022, indicated, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted R5 on 09/26/24. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included, but was not limited to, diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, other specified disorders of bone, morbid (severe) obesity due to excess…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and review of the owner's manual for Model: F600B Bariatric Full Body Patient Lift, the facility failed to ensure staff safely transferred 1 (Resident (R)5) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for falls. Specifically, on 07/19/25, a staff member failed to follow the resident's care plan and ignored the noises emitted from the mechanical lift when she assisted the resident with a transfer from their bed to their wheelchair. During the transfer, the mechanical lift malfunctioned, and R5 fell to the floor. Findings include: Review of a document titled Competency Assessment Lifting Machine, Using a Mechanical, revised on 07/2017, revealed, The purpose of this procedure is to establish the general principles of safe lifting using a mechanical lifting device. It is not a substitute for manufacturer's training or instructions. The Steps in the Procedure section revealed, 8. Make sure that all necessary equipment (slings, hooks, chains, straps and supports) is on hand and in good condition.An Owner's Manual for the Model: F600B Bariatric Full Body Patient…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff did not utilize a geriatric chair without assessing whether the use of the geriatric chair was considered a restraint for 1 (Resident (R)1) of 3 residents reviewed for falls. Specifically, despite a known history of climbing out of the side of their geriatric chair and a history of climbing from their bed over their geriatric chair when staff positioned it by the resident's bed, staff placed R1 in a geriatric chair in a reclined position and also utilized the geriatric chair positioned along the side of the resident's bed while the resident was in bed to prevent the resident from getting up without staff's knowledge. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Use of Restraints, revised 04/2017, indicated, Restraints shall only be used for the safety and well-being of the resident(s) and only after other alternatives have been tried unsuccessfully. Restraints shall only be used to treat the resident's medical symptom(s) and never for discipline or staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected falls and resulting injuries for 1 (Resident (R)1) of 3 sampled residents. Findings included: A facility policy titled, MDS 3.0 Completion, reviewed/revised on 09/30/2024, revealed, According to federal regulations, the facility conducts initially a periodically a comprehensive, accurate and standardized assessment of each resident's functional capacity, using the RAI [Resident Assessment Instrument] specified by the State. The section of the policy titled, Care Plan Team Responsibility for Assessment Completion, 1. Interdisciplinary Responsibility for Completion of MDS Sections specified, c. Persons completing part of the assessment must attest to the accuracy of the section they completed. R1's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 03/29/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of cauda equina syndrome (a condition that occurs when the cauda equina,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff checked for incontinence and/or provided incontinence care during routine rounds for 1 (Resident (R)1) of 3 residents reviewed for falls. Specifically, on the evening 01/25/2025, after the resident experienced an assisted fall to the floor, staff placed the resident in a geriatric chair and did not check to see if the resident required incontinence care until sometime between 5:00 AM to 6:00 AM the following morning. Findings included: R1's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 03/29/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of cauda equina syndrome (a condition that occurs when the cauda equina, the bundle of nerves at the base of the spinal cord, become compressed); other mechanical complication of internal fixation device of vertebrae; history of falling; lack of coordination; muscle weakness; dementia; bipolar disorder, current episode manic severe with psychotic features; unspecified mood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-08 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to maintain the dignity for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity and infection control. Specifically, the facility did not provide a privacy bag for Resident (R)33's catheter bag. Furthermore, the catheter bag was found on the resident's floor during multiple observations. Cross-reference F880. Findings include: Review of the policy titled, Resident Rights, revised on 10/01/24, states: Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect and dignity. 3. Our facility will make every effort to assist each resident in exercising his/her rights to assure that the resident is always treated with respect, kindness, and dignity. Review of CDC Infection Control Summary of Recommendations with a revised date of 03/25/24 states, III.B.2. Keep the collecting bag below the bladder. Do not rest the bag on the floor. Review of R33's face sheet revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,868 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,868 — penalty dated 2025-05-16

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ROSENBERG FAMILY — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $300K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in SC